Dear Sir,
With regard to the paper, which entitled “STUDY ON PARAMETERS IN COUNTER CURRENT DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER APPLYING CIRCULAR TURBULATOR”, below is the table listed the revised items.
Revision Correction
1 The abstract is incomplete and poorly organized. A good abstract should reflect background, objectives, methodology and results to give readers a complete view of the work presented.
1. A partial correction of the abstract has already been done in the paper to give readers more systematical and complete insight signed in RED PRINT.
2 The objective of this study is not clearly defined.
2. This suggestion has already included in the last paragraph of the Introduction part attributed in RED PRINT.
3 Please use standard font in the paragraph after figure 1.
3. This revision is already corrected in RED PRINT.
4 The analysis is not sufficient. An in- depth and analytical examination of experimental results using related theory and formulas is expected.
4. Analytical examinations with regard to classical thermal rules encountered with the explanation of the graphs have already included in the Result and Discussion section signed in RED PRINT
5 The conclusion should answer the research question and explain your interpretation of the findings.
5. The update conclusion is absolutely revised with regard to results of research question and interpretation of the findings signed in RED PRINT.
Regards,
Sudiono
