• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

supplemental digital content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "supplemental digital content"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT METHODS

In Vitro Metformin Transport Studies

Effect of Dolutegravir on Metformin Transport by MATE1 and MATE2-K

HEK293 cells transfected with human MATE1, MATE2-K, or vector control were established by Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd. (Naka-gun, Ibaraki, Japan). Cells were cultured in 75-cm2 bottom flasks and subjected to passage every 3 to 4 days. The culture medium was exchanged every 4 days. MATE1 cells were seeded in collagen I-coated 24-well plates at a density of 2.5×105 cells/well and incubated (37°C, 5% CO2) for 2 days. For MATE2-K, HEK293 cells were seeded in collagen I-coated 12-well plates at a density of 3.5×105 cells/well and incubated (37°C, 5% CO2) for 1 day; cells were then transfected with MATE2-K cDNA and incubated for an additional 2 days.

Uptake experiments were initiated by pre-incubation (15 minutes, 37°C) with Gibco® Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; pH 8.5 to invert MATE transport directionality inward) containing dolutegravir or cimetidine (0-100 µM). After pre-incubation, cells were incubated (5 minutes, 37°C) with HBSS (pH 8.5) solutions containing 10 µM [14C]metformin, dolutegravir, or cimetidine (0-100 µM).

Cellular uptake of [14C]metformin was quantified by radiometric detection; protein content was determined by Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Effect of Dolutegravir on Metformin Transport by PMAT and OCT3

MDCK-II cells transfected with human PMAT, OCT3, or vector control were established by Optivia Biotechnology, Inc (Menlo Park, CA). MDCK-II cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with low glucose, low sodium bicarbonate, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).

Cells between passage 7 and 30 were seeded at a density of 6±1×104 cells/well on 96-well transwell membrane plates 1 day before transfection; transport assays were carried out following 2-day incubation (37°C, 5% CO2) after transfection.

(2)

Uptake experiments were initiated by pre-incubation in both apical and basolateral chambers (15 minutes, 37°C, orbital shaking at 60 rpm) with HBSS containing inhibitors dolutegravir (0-100 µM), quinidine (1 mM), decynium-22 (100 µM), or verapamil (0-100 µM). After pre-incubation, cells were incubated in the basolateral chambers (5 minutes, 37°C, 60 rpm) with HBSS solutions containing

inhibitors and probe substrates: 10 µM [14C]metformin for both PMAT and OCT3; 10 µM [14C]1-methyl- 4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) for PMAT, 2 µM [14C]MPP+ for OCT3, and 100 µM

[14C]tetraethylammonium for OCT3. Cellular uptake of probe substrate was determined by radiometric detection.

Effect of Dolutegravir on Paracellular Permeability and Cellular Uptake of Metformin

Caco-2 cells (wild type C2BBe1, ATCC catalog # CRL-2102) were received from Sigma- Aldrich, Inc (St. Louis, MO) as a high throughput assay ready plate on day 16 or 17 of culture. Plates were Millicell® 24-cell culture multi-well inserts with polycarbonate membranes, 0.4 µm pore size, and 0.7 cm2 surface area. Pre-seeded plates were unpacked and processed according to the vendor’s

instructions. Briefly, plates were left at room temperature for 24 to 48 hours then elevated to 37°C, 5%

CO2 in a cell culture incubator for 4 hours to liquefy the shipping medium and to allow a culture medium change (DMEM, 20% FBS, supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine). Following the initial media change, plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 and culture medium was replaced every 2 to 3 days. Plates were used prior to day 25 of culture as recommended by the vendor.

Effect of dolutegravir on Lucifer yellow paracellular flux: basolateral and apical chamber incubation solutions were transport medium (DMEM supplemented with L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, pyridoxine HCl, but without sodium pyruvate and phenol red, pH 7.4) containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) for the first 15 minutes. For the subsequent 90 minutes, the apical incubation solutions were transport medium containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) and 100 µM Lucifer yellow. In a separate set of experiments, basolateral-to-apical flux of Lucifer yellow was determined in confluent MDCKII cell monolayers in the absence or presence of dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM).

(3)

Effect of dolutegravir absorptive (apical-to-basolateral) flux of [14C]metformin: basolateral and apical chamber incubation solutions were transport medium containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) for the first 15 minutes. For the subsequent 90 minutes, the apical incubation solutions were transport medium containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) and [14C]metformin (0.05-5 mM).

Effect of dolutegravir on the cellular uptake of [14C]metformin: basolateral and apical chamber incubation solutions were transport medium containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) for the first 15 minutes. Subsequently, the apical incubation solutions were transport medium containing dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) and [14C]metformin (0.05-5 mM). Cell monolayers were incubated at 37°C with shaking in the time-linear range for metformin uptake (10 minutes at 0.05 mM, 2.5 minutes at 0.5 and 5 mM).

Lucifer yellow concentrations were measured by fluorescence spectrophotometry. [14C]metformin was quantified by radiometric detection; protein content was determined by Thermo Scientific™ Pierce™

BCA Protein Assay Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions.

(4)

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT RESULTS

In Vitro Metformin Transport Studies

Effect of Dolutegravir on Metformin Transport by MATE1 and MATE2-K

Dolutegravir (GSK1349572) was not a clinically relevant inhibitor of [14C]metformin transport by MATE1 (IC50 = 6.3±1.1 μM) and MATE2-K (IC50 = 24.8±4.7 μM) (Supplemental Figure 1). The positive control MATE inhibitor, cimetidine, inhibited MATE1- and MATE2-K-mediated [14C]metformin

transport with IC50 values of 2.8±0.5 and 3.6±0.6 μM, respectively (Supplemental Figure 2). Cell viability in control, MATE1, and MATE2-K-expressing HEK293 cells in the presence of dolutegravir ranged from 99% to 111% of vehicle control for up to 100 μM dolutegravir (data not shown).

Effect of Dolutegravir on Metformin Transport by PMAT and OCT3

Dolutegravir (≤100 μM) did not inhibit [14C]MPP+ uptake by PMAT or OCT3 (Supplemental Figure 3). Likewise, dolutegravir (≤100 μM) did not inhibit [14C]metformin uptake by PMAT, and it did not inhibit OCT3 at concentrations ≤10 μM, while 10% to 25% inhibition of [14C]metformin transport by OCT3 was noted at 30 to 100 μM dolutegravir concentrations (Supplemental Figure 4). Positive control inhibitors, 100 μM decynium-22 for PMAT and 1 mM quinidine for OCT3, inhibited PMAT and OCT3 transport activities by 78% to 88% and 92% to 95%, respectively. In addition, the positive control OCT3 inhibitor, verapamil, inhibited transport of 100 μM [14C]tetraethylammonium via OCT3, with an IC50 of 2.94 µM, and 95.8% inhibition at 100 µM verapamil (data not shown).

Effect of Dolutegravir on Paracellular Permeability and Cellular Uptake of Metformin

Dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) did not increase the paracellular permeability of Lucifer yellow in a concentration-dependent manner in Caco-2 cell monolayers, with mean absorptive (apical-to-basolateral) permeability of 7.5 nm/sec and 14.2 nm/sec at 0.3 µM and 1 to 100 µM dolutegravir, respectively.

Likewise, in MDCKII cell monolayers Lucifer yellow basolateral-to-apical Lucifer yellow permeability was comparable in the absence and presence of (0.3-100 µM) dolutegravir (11.1±5.0 vs 9.4±4.2 nm/sec, respectively). Finally, dolutegravir (≤100 µM) did not increase the absorptive (apical-to-basolateral) flux

(5)

of metformin in Caco-2 cell monolayers (Supplemental Table 1). Dolutegravir (0.3-100 µM) did not affect the cellular uptake of metformin (0.05, 0.5, 5 mM) into Caco-2 monolayers (Supplemental Table 2).

(6)

Supplemental Table 1. Effect of Dolutegravir (GSK1349572) on [

14

C]Metformin Flux in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers

Metformin Concentration

GSK1349572 Concentration (μM)

Rate A→B (pmoles/min/cm2)

A→B Mass Balance (%)

0.05 mM [14C]metformin 0 1.3±0.21 98±0.041

0.3 35±27 105±0.060

1 2.1±0.87 98±0.010

3 5.9±5.8 99±0.027

10 34±30 103±0.059

30 16±15 101±0.036

100 13±9.6 97±0.015

0.5 mM [14C]metformin 0 17±3.6 102±0.036

0.3 15±0.34 101±0.0060

1 20±2.2 101±0.022

3 353±365 107±0.042

10 18±0.83 102±0.028

30 17.6±2.96 99.3±0.024

100 27.9±19.8 96.2±0.025

5 mM [14C]metformin 0 136±11.3 99.7±0.018

0.3 150±42.0 98.3±0.015

1 142±16.1 98.4±0.019

3 211±120 99.1±0.017

10 150±24.2 99.2±0.032

30 469±504 97.8±0.050

100 1709±1265 99.6±0.025

 

(7)

Supplemental Table 2. Effect of Dolutegravir (GSK1349572) on [

14

C]Metformin Cellular Uptake in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers.

GSK1349572 (μM)

0.05 mM [14C]Metformin

0.5 mM [14C]Metformin

5 mM [14C]Metformin (pmol/μg

protein) SD

(pmol/μg

protein) SD

(pmol/μg

protein) SD

0 17 5.2 14 11 11 4.3

0.3 11 5.1 10 2.3 6.9 1.4

1 9.6 4.9 9.9 3.1 8.5 3.4

3 11 3.2 6.7 1.9 8.7 0.27

10 21 0.94 14 1.1 6.7 1.7

30 17 8.2 25 15 6.7 1.7

100 16 7.8 22 19 8.2 1.3

SD, standard deviation.

Data are average of samples from triplicate wells.

 

(8)

Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 50 100

Concentration of GSK1349572 (µM) Control cells

MATE1-expressing cells

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

Inhibitory effect of GSK1349572 on MATE1-mediated transport of metformin IC50value for the inhibition by GSK1349572 on MATE1-mediated transport of metformin

Concentration of GSK1349572 (µM) Slope factor: 0.830

[14C]Metformin GSK1349572 0 1.98 ± 0.24 24.6 ± 1.4 100.0 6.34 ± 1.11

(10 µM) 0.1 1.85 ± 0.15 24.4 ± 0.9 99.7

0.3 2.12 ± 0.48 24.4 ± 1.4 98.5

1 1.73 ± 0.16 20.5 ± 0.1 83.0

3 1.70 ± 0.30 17.8 ± 0.8 71.2

10 1.35 ± 0.15 8.91 ± 0.53 33.4

30 1.10 ± 0.08 6.67 ± 0.41 24.6

50 0.874 ± 0.049 5.21 ± 0.38 19.2

100 0.981 ± 0.084 3.50 ± 0.18 11.1

Each value represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

The IC50 value represents the mean ± SE.

Substrate

(concentration) Test compound Concentration (µM)

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

% of control IC50

Control cells MATE1-expressing cells

Supplemental Figure 1. Effect of dolutegravir (GSK1349572) on metformin transport by MATE1 and MATE2-K.

(9)

Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

0 5 10 15

0 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 50 100

Concentration of GSK1349572 (µM) Control cells

MATE2-K-expressing cells

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

Inhibitory effect of GSK1349572 on MATE2-K-mediated transport of metformin IC50value for the inhibition by GSK1349572 on MATE2-K-mediated transport of metformin

Concentration of GSK1349572 (µM) Slope factor: 0.917

[14C]Metformin GSK1349572 0 1.30 ± 0.11 9.82 ± 0.94 100.0 24.8 ± 4.7

(10 µM) 0.1 1.19 ± 0.11 10.2 ± 0.2 105.8

0.3 1.05 ± 0.06 10.0 ± 0.5 105.0

1 0.952 ± 0.083 10.2 ± 0.7 108.5

3 1.15 ± 0.06 8.89 ± 0.44 90.8

10 0.941 ± 0.030 7.00 ± 1.00 71.1

30 0.862 ± 0.055 5.46 ± 0.19 54.0

50 0.683 ± 0.009 3.03 ± 0.08 27.5

100 0.683 ± 0.006 3.19 ± 0.36 29.4

Each value represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

The IC50 value represents the mean ± SE.

Substrate

(concentration) Test compound Concentration (µM)

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

% of control IC50

Control cells MATE2-K-expressing cells

(10)

Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 50 100

Concentration of cimetidine (µM) Control cells

MATE1-expressing cells

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

Inhibitory effect of cimetidine on MATE1-mediated transport of metformin IC50value for the inhibition by cimetidine on MATE1-mediated transport of metformin

Concentration of cimetidine (µM) Slope factor: 1.08

[14C]Metformin Cimetidine 0 1.98 ± 0.24 24.6 ± 1.4 100.0 2.82 ± 0.46

(10 µM) 0.1 1.99 ± 0.28 25.6 ± 3.3 104.4

0.3 1.70 ± 0.19 25.8 ± 1.1 106.5

1 1.67 ± 0.03 18.4 ± 2.3 74.0

3 1.19 ± 0.09 12.9 ± 0.3 51.8

10 1.09 ± 0.06 5.81 ± 0.27 20.9

30 0.953 ± 0.038 3.33 ± 1.01 10.5

50 0.975 ± 0.150 2.15 ± 0.06 5.2

100 1.10 ± 0.07 2.25 ± 0.09 5.1

Each value represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

The IC50 value represents the mean ± SE.

Substrate

(concentration) Test compound Concentration (µM)

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

% of control IC50

Control cells MATE1-expressing cells

Supplemental Figure 2. Effect of cimetidine on metformin transport by MATE1 and MATE2-K.

(11)

Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

0 5 10 15

0 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 50 100

Concentration of cimetidine (µM) Control cells

MATE2-K-expressing cells

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

Inhibitory effect of cimetidine on MATE2-K-mediated transport of metformin IC50value for the inhibition by cimetidine on MATE2-K-mediated transport of metformin

Concentration of cimetidine (µM) Slope factor: 0.689

[14C]Metformin Cimetidine 0 1.30 ± 0.11 9.82 ± 0.94 100.0 3.65 ± 0.59

(10 µM) 0.1 1.08 ± 0.05 8.77 ± 0.86 90.3

0.3 1.13 ± 0.06 8.15 ± 0.38 82.4

1 0.866 ± 0.039 7.31 ± 0.41 75.6

3 0.818 ± 0.078 5.29 ± 0.54 52.5

10 0.921 ± 0.083 3.35 ± 0.22 28.5

30 0.714 ± 0.117 2.33 ± 0.57 19.0

50 0.681 ± 0.036 1.96 ± 0.16 15.0

100 0.653 ± 0.071 1.77 ± 0.15 13.1

Each value represents the mean ± SD of three samples.

The IC50 value represents the mean ± SE.

Substrate

(concentration) Test compound Concentration (µM)

Cleared volume (µL/mg protein)

% of control IC50

Control cells MATE2-K-expressing cells

(12)

GSK1349572 (µM)

Percent of Control (%)

0.1 1 10 100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Inhibition of 2M MPP+ uptake mediated by OCT3

 

2 µM MPP+ uptake by OCT3: 

GSK 1349572 (µM)

Cellular Accumulation

(transporter) (pmol/min/cm2)

Cellular Accumulation (control) (pmol/min/cm2)

Net Transporter Mediated Cellular

Accumulation (pmol/min/cm2)

Inhibition (%)

0 8.50 ± 1.20 0.375  0.0590 8.13  1.20 0.00  14.8 0.1 uM 8.14  0.950 0.343  0.0804 7.79  0.950 4.14  11.7 0.3 uM 7.86  0.986 0.311  0.0335 7.55  0.986 7.13  12.1 0.5 uM 7.47  0.918 0.288  0.0255 7.19  0.918 11.6  11.3 1 uM 7.39  0.211 0.281  0.0442 7.11  0.211 12.5  2.60 3 uM 7.37  0.782 0.347  0.0585 7.03  0.782 13.6  9.62 5 uM 8.19  0.857 0.384  0.0274 7.81  0.857 3.96  10.5 10 uM 8.46  0.781 0.396  0.0374 8.06  0.781 0.849  9.61 30 uM 8.56  0.620 0.330  0.0274 8.23  0.620 -1.20  7.63 50 uM 7.95  0.783 0.349  0.0601 7.60  0.783 6.56  9.63 100 uM 7.87  0.276 0.329  0.0731 7.54  0.276 7.27  3.40 1mM Quinidine 0.745  0.0304 0.342  0.0551 0.403  0.0304 95.0  0.374  

10 µM MPP+ uptake by PMAT: 

GSK 1349572 (µM)

Cellular Accumulation

(transporter) (pmol/min/cm2)

Cellular Accumulation (control) (pmol/min/cm2)

Net Transporter Mediated Cellular

Accumulation (pmol/min/cm2)

Inhibition (%)

0 12.9 ± 0.173 0.789  0.0972 12.2  0.173 0.00  1.42 0.1 13.3  0.402 0.712  0.0590 12.6  0.402 -3.65  3.30 0.3 12.5  1.49 0.763  0.0972 11.8  1.49 3.12  12.2 0.5 13.8  1.01 0.680  0.102 13.2  1.01 -8.24  8.27 1 14.0  0.381 0.974  0.0675 13.0  0.381 -7.12  3.14 3 14.2  0.492 0.842  0.111 13.4  0.492 -10.0  4.04 5 13.2  1.25 0.923  0.0359 12.3  1.25 -1.18  10.3 10 13.6  0.946 0.876  0.0903 12.7  0.946 -4.75  7.78 30 13.7  0.332 0.756  0.104 13.0  0.332 -6.78  2.73 50 12.9  0.488 0.685  0.110 12.2  0.488 -0.475  4.01 100 13.2  0.686 0.712  0.0866 12.5  0.686 -2.91  5.65 100 µM Decynium-22 3.06  0.310 0.449  0.105 2.61  0.310 78.5  2.55  

Supplemental Figure 3. Effect of dolutegravir (GSK1349572) on MPP+ transport by PMAT and OCT3.

(13)

 

GSK1349572 (µM)

Percent of Control (%)

0.1 1 10 100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Inhibition of 10 µM Metformin uptake mediated by OCT3

10 µM Metformin uptake by PMAT: 

GSK 1349572 (µM)

Cellular Accumulation

(transporter) (pmol/min/cm2)

Cellular Accumulation (control) (pmol/min/cm2)

Net Transporter Mediated Cellular

Accumulation (pmol/min/cm2)

Inhibition (%)

0 2.87 ± 0.0976 0.265  0.0357 2.61  0.0976 0.00  3.74 0.1 2.73  0.00689 0.293  0.0655 2.44  0.00689 6.45  0.264 0.3 3.04  0.183 0.317  0.0855 2.72  0.183 -4.35  7.03 0.5 3.20  0.107 0.234  0.0371 2.97  0.107 -13.9  4.12 1 3.25  0.225 0.199  0.0371 3.05  0.225 -17.1  8.61 3 3.27  0.225 0.214  0.00852 3.05  0.225 -17.1  8.62 5 2.75  0.286 0.374  0.158 2.38  0.286 8.87  11.0 10 2.68  0.231 0.402  0.101 2.28  0.231 12.6  8.85 30 2.75  0.195 0.376  0.0100 2.37  0.195 8.93  7.47 50 2.72  0.281 0.239  0.0746 2.49  0.281 4.67  10.8 100 2.57  0.321 0.220  0.0385 2.35  0.321 9.81  12.3 100 µM Decynium-22 0.529  0.0264 0.229  0.0588 0.299  0.0264 88.5  1.01  10 µM Metformin uptake by OCT3: 

GSK 1349572 (µM)

Cellular Accumulation (transporter) (pmol/min/cm2)

Cellular Accumulation (control) (pmol/min/cm2)

Net Transporter Mediated Cellular

Accumulation (pmol/min/cm2)

Inhibition (%)

0 1.17 ± 0.0591 0.250  0.0295 0.923  0.0591 0.00  6.41 0.1 1.10  0.166 0.241  0.0142 0.858  0.166 7.03  18.0 0.3 1.20  0.0810 0.269  0.0246 0.932  0.0810 -1.00  8.78 0.5 1.10  0.0148 0.283  0.0590 0.822  0.0148 11.0  1.60

1 1.09  0.262 0.283  0.0147 0.805  0.262 12.8  28.4 3 1.01  0.0718 0.273  0.0614 0.740  0.0718 19.8  7.78 5 1.11  0.0466 0.198  0.0142 0.914  0.0466 1.01  5.05 10 1.16  0.0931 0.303  0.0456 0.861  0.0931 6.72  10.1 30 1.12  0.0536 0.284  0.0375 0.833  0.0536 9.73  5.80 50 1.04  0.0317 0.336  0.0666 0.705  0.0317 23.6  3.43 100 1.05  0.0997 0.360  0.0420 0.690  0.0997 25.2  10.8 1mM Quinidine 1.70  0.0760 1.63  0.0436 0.0733  0.0760 92.1  8.24  

Supplemental Figure 4. Effect of dolutegravir (GSK1349572) on metformin transport by PMAT and OCT3.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Is there a significant effect for leadership self-efficacy and trust in team members simultaneously in leadership agility during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis?” The benefits of this

ISI EDARAN KEWAJIBAN 1 2 3 Perusahaan Industri dan Perusahaan Kawasan Industri di wilayah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Jakarta, Provinsi Jawa Barat, dan Provinsi Banten yang dalam