• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Supplemental Digital Table 1 - http;//links.lww.com

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Supplemental Digital Table 1 - http;//links.lww.com"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Supplemental Digital Table 1

Quality Reporting of the 42 Quantitative Studies According to the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI)ᵃ

Study authors and

date

Study design

Sampling:

No. of institutions

Sampling:

Response rate

Type of data

Validity:

Internal structure

Validity:

Content

Validity:

Relationshi p to variables

Data analysis:

Appropriate ness

Data analysis:

Complexity Outcomes Score Adilman et

al., 2016

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Barker et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10.5

Bensalem- Owen et al., 2011

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

100%

(1.5)

objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

knowledge, skills (1.5)

14

Ben-Yakov et al., 2015

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

behaviors (2) 11

Bergl et al., 2015

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

64.2% (1) assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 9.5

Bogoch et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

2

institutions (1)

58% (1) assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 10

Calderon et al., 2011

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

6

(2)

Colvin et al., 2018

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

>75%

(1.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

behaviors (2) 11.5

Chandawark ar et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 12

Cook et al., 2013

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10.5

Dawkins et al., 2017

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 12

Deloney et al., 2014

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

8

Desai et al., 2014

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

>75%

(1.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 10.5

Desai et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

12.5

Diller et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

2

institutions (1)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

behaviors (2) 11

Farber et al., 2017

single group crosssectional or single group

> 2 institutions (1.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

behaviors (2) 13.6

(3)

posttest only (1)

Galiatsatos et al., 2016

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

50-74%

(1)

objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

behaviors (2) 13

George et al., 2014

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Ginory et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Go et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Go et al., 2012 (PDs)

nonrandomized 2 group (2)

2

institutions (1)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

inappropriat e (0)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

8.5

Golden et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9.5

Irfan et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

>75%

(1.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Jain et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

>75%

(1.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

11

(4)

Jent et al., 2011

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

>75%

(1.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Khandelwal et al., 2015

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

50-74%

(1)

objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

Knowledge/

skills (1.5)

12.5

Klee et al., 2015

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Koontz et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10.5

Langenfeld et al., 2016

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Lefebvre et al., 2016

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9.5

Liu et al., 2017

single group, pre/post (1.5)

2

institutions (1)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

Knowledge/

skills (1.5)

12.5

Matava et al., 2013

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Loeb et al., 2013

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

(5)

Moubarak et al., 2011

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

1

institution (0.5)

50-74%

(1)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9.5

Nikolian et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

11.5

Oyewumi et al., 2017

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Ranschaert et al., 2016

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

descriptive analysis only (1)

attitude/

perception s (1)

9

Rivas et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

10

Salem et al., 2017

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institutions (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

11

Schweitzer et al., 2012

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institution (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

objective (3)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

not reported (0)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

behaviors (2) 11

Vasilopoul os et al., 2015

single group, pre/post (1.5)

1

institution (0.5)

N/A objective (3)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

beyond descriptive analysis (2)

Knowledge/

skills (1.5)

13.6

(6)

Wagner et al., 2018

single group crosssectional or single group posttest only (1)

> 2 institution (1.5)

<50% or not reported (0.5)

assessment by study participant (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

reported (1)

appropriate (1)

Beyond descriptive analysis (2)

attitude/

perception s (1)

11

ᵃ Numbers in each cell in parentheses equate to the points acquired per criteria. The mean MERSQI score for the 42 quantitative studies was 10.48.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

3 Supplemental Digital Table 2 Patterns of Interaction Between Guiding Principles and Modifiers That Emerged from Five Focus Groups of 40 Practicing Internists Discussing

Supplemental Table 1: Extended Patient Characteristics and Repurposed Medication Practice Stratified by Pandemic Stage Characteristics Overall Pandemic Stage Early: February

1 Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 Focus Group Scripts from a Qualitative Study of Trainees and Their Mentors Regarding the Development of Scientific Communication Skills, 2010

3 Supplemental Digital Table 2 Comparison of Actual Resident Complement with Model Prediction of Candidate Hospitals that Could Support a General Surgery Residency Program Actual

3 Supplemental Digital Table 3 Sponsoring Institutions Training the Most Residents in Federally Qualified Health Centers, by Number of Residents 2001-2005, 2009 Sponsoring

Supplemental Table 3 a Comparison of probability of failure for all types of glaucoma for 1st Baerveldt surgery, p=0.41 b Comparison of probability of failure for all types of

2 Supplemental Digital Appendix 2 Questionnaire for Recipients of a Prefecture Scholarship, From a Study of Rural Physician Placement Programs in Japan, 2014–2016 Please answer

10 Supplemental Digital Appendix 8 Atrial Fibrillation Quality Measures Preliminary Analyses Preliminary analyses involved patients with diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in any