Supplemental Material
Corresponding to
Diabetic neuropathy is independently associated with worse graft outcomes and incident cardiovascular disease after pancreas transplantation: a
retrospective cohort study in type 1 diabetes
Laura Boswell, MD,1,2 Pedro Ventura-Aguiar, MD, PhD,3,4 Aida Alejaldre, MD, PhD,5 Judith Navarro-Otano, MD, PhD,5 Frederic Cofan, MD, PhD,3,4 Tonet Serés-Noriega, MD,1 Adriana Pané, MD,1 Enrique Montagud-Marrahi, MD,3 Alicia Molina-Andújar, MD,3 Montserrat Ruiz, RN,1 David Cucchiari, MD, PhD,3 Mireia Musquera, MD, PhD,6 Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega, MD, PhD,7 Fritz Diekmann, MD,
PhD,3,4,8 Enric Esmatjes, MD, PhD,9,10and Antonio J. Amor, MD, PhD1
1 Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
2 Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Althaia University Health Network, Manres a, Spain
3 Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
4 Laboratori Experimental
de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Augus t Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
5 Neurology Department, Hospital Clínic de
Barcelona and Institut d´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
6 Urology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
7 Hepatobiliopancreatic and Liver Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
8 Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain.
9 Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August
Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
10 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Supplemental Material and Methods Surgical technique
The surgical technique has previously described.1-3 All pancreas transplants
procedures were performed with enteric anastomosis. Duodeno-jejunal anastomosis with intraperitoneal position was used until 2016, and from June 2016 onward a retroperitoneal position with duodeno-duodenal anastomosis. Systemic venous drainage was performed through anastomosis between graft’s portal vein to the recipient’s inferior vena cava. For the arterial anastomosis, superior mesenteric artery was end-to-end anastomosed to splenic artery. In the current era, a Y graft is used. Arterial anastomosis is performed to the recipient common iliac artery or directly to the aorta.
Anticoagulation and Immunosuppression
Anticoagulation and immunosuppression have been previously specified.4 Briefly, subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg bid was started 8h postsurgery and was
maintained until patient discharge (in the absence of thrombotic/haemorrhagic complications), and acetylsalicylic acid 50 mg/day was started at 12h postsurgery until discharge, when it is increased up to 100 mg/day. Regarding
immunosuppression, induction therapy consisted in 2 doses of anti-IL2 monoclonal antibody (basiliximab; 20 mg at day 0 and at day +4 after surgery) until July 2013, and thereafter replaced by rabbit anti-human lymphocytes polyclonal antibodies (either Thymoglobulin 1.25mg/Kg/day or ATG 2.5mg/Kg/day) for 4 consecutive days.
Maintenance immunosuppression protocol was based on triple therapy with calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A until 2005, and thereafter tacrolimus),
mycophenolate, and steroids (methylprednisolone in the immediate posttransplant period, followed by oral prednisone).
References
1. Gilabert R, Fernández-Cruz L, Real MI, et al.Treatment and outcome of pancreatic venous graft thrombosis after kidney-pancreas transplantation. Br J Surg. 2002;89(3):355–360.
2. Barrufet M, Burrel M, Angeles García-Criado M, et al. Pancreas transplants venous graft thrombosis: endovascular thrombolysis for graft rescue.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(5):1226–1234.
3. Ferrer J, Molina V, Rull R, et al. Trasplante de páncreas: ventajas de la posición retroperitoneal del injerto. Cir Esp. 2017;95(9):513–520.
4. Montagud-Marrahi E, Molina-Andújar A, Pané A, et al. Outcomes of pancreas transplantation in older diabetic patients. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care.
2020;8(1):e000916.
Table S1. Pretransplant characteristics of the participants according to transplantation modality (SPK vs PAK).
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).
aMissing value n=42
b Missing value n=4
c Missing value n=36
§ Missing value n=23
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; PAK, pancreas after kidney; SPK, simultaneous pancreas-kidney.
SPK (n=176)
PAK
(n=11) p-value
Clinical characteristics
Age at pancreas transplant (years) 39.8±7.0 40.8±8.5 0.656
Gender (Male) 124 (70.5) 7 (63.6) 0.736
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.4±3.3 22.7±3.3 0.529
<25 127 (72.2) 8 (72.7)
0.784
25-29.9 42 (23.8) 3 (27.3)
³30 7 (4.0) 0 (0)
Active smokersa 46 (34.1) 3 (30.0) 0.793
Systolic BP (mmHg) 138±23 129±24 0.289
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 81±14 71±11 0.021
Diabetic retinopathy 171 (97.2) 11 (100) 0.736
Cardiovascular disease 44 (25.0) 3 (27.3) 0.866
Diabetes duration (years) 27.0±6.7 29.3±9.7 0.465 Patients receiving dialysis 138 (78.4) 5 (45.5) 0.022
Laboratory characteristics
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 187±52 154±19 <0.001 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 119 (85-161) 111 (84-163) 0.969
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 106±36 82±14 <0.001
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 54±18 47±11 0.259
HbA1c (%) 7.8±1.7 7.7±1.9 0.813
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 62±18 61±21 0.813
Treatment characteristics
Intensive insulin therapyb 111 (64.5) 9 (81.8) 0.335
Insulin dose (U/Kg) 0.58±0.20 0.70±0.20 0.079
Lipid-lowering drugsc 77 (54.2) 4 (44.4) 0.734
ACEi or ARB used 106 (68.4) 6 (66.7) 0.914
Use of 3 or more antihypertensive
drugsd 68 (43.9) 4 (44.9) 0.973
Table S2. Clinical characteristics of the participants according to orthostatic hypotension at baseline.
Whole cohort (n=187)
Orthostatic hypotension
p-value No
(n=152) Yes (n=28)
Clinical characteristics
Age at transplant (years) 39.9±7.1 39.5±7.2 40.3±6.3 0.611 Gender (Male) 131 (70.1) 105 (69.1) 19 (67.9) 0.898
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.3±3.3 23.2±3.1 23.8±4.1 0.443
<25 135 (72.2) 111 (73.0) 19 (67.9)
0.126
25-29.9 45 (24.1) 37 (24.3) 6 (21.4)
³30 7 (3.7) 4 (2.6) 3 (10.7)
Active smokersa 49 (33.8) 40 (33.9) 7 (33.3) 0.960
Systolic BP (mmHg) 137±23 136±22 142±22 0.173
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 81±14 79±13 87±18 0.026
Diabetic retinopathy 182 (97.3) 147 (96.7) 28 (100) 0.330 Cardiovascular disease 47 (25.1) 34 (22.4) 8 (28.6) 0.476 Diabetes duration (years) 27.1±6.9 27.1±6.9 26.1±6.2 0.460 Patients receiving dialysis 143 (76.5) 114 (75.0) 23 (82.1) 0.415
Laboratory characteristics
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 185±51 183±45 195±76 0.293 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 118 (85-161) 120 (88-168) 104 (85-151) 0.345 LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 104±35 104±35 104±39 0.950
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 53±17 53±17 51±17 0.611
HbA1c (%) 7.8±1.7 7.7±1.5 8.6±2.1 0.065
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 62±18 61±17 70±24 0.065
Treatment characteristics
Intensive insulin therapyb 120 (65.6) 100 (67.6) 17 (60.7) 0.481 Insulin dose (U/Kg) 0.59±0.20 0.60±0.22 0.55±0.16 0.269 Lipid-lowering drugsc 81 (53.6) 68 (55.7) 9 (40.9) 0.199 ACEi or ARB used 112 (68.3) 94 (70.1) 14 (58.3) 0.252 Use of 3 or more
antihypertensive drugsd 72 (43.9) 62 (46.6) 8 (33.3) 0.228
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).
aMissing value n=42
b Missing value n=4
c Missing value n=36
c Missing value n=23
BMI, body mass index; BP; blood pressure; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.
Table S3. Participants’ characteristics according to normalization of vibration perception thresholds at 6 months.
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). Only participants with abnormal VPTs at baseline and with information at 6 months were included (n=86).
aMissing value n=16
b Missing value n=3
c Missing value n=19
d Missing value n=13
Normalization of VPTs at 6 months p-value No
(n=56)
Yes (n=30)
Baseline clinical characteristics
Age at transplant (years) 42.4±6.5 38.8±5.8 0.013
Gender (Male) 45 (80.4) 23 (76.7) 0.688
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.8±3.1 23.7±2.8 0.838
<25 38 (67.9) 22 (73.3) 0.730
25-29.9 17 (30.4) 7 (23.3)
³30 1 (1.8) 1 (3.3)
Active smokersa 12 (26.1) 6 (25.0) 0.921
Systolic BP (mmHg) 142±21 143±18 0.804
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 83±14 82±11 0.666
Diabetic retinopathy 55 (98.2) 30 (100) 0.462
Cardiovascular disease 16 (28.6) 9 (30.0) 0.889
Diabetes duration (years) 27.6±6.3 27.6±7.1 0.996
Patients receiving dialysis 39 (69.6) 23 (76.7) 0.489
VPTs (V) 29.6±7.3 24.4±4.8 0.001
Baseline laboratory characteristics
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 184±57 167±48 0.188
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 109 (84-167) 88 (80-147) 0.096
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 107±33 88±35 0.039
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 48±13 53±17 0.252
HbA1c (%) 7.7±1.7 7.2±1.1 0.178
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 61±19 55±12 0.178
Baseline treatment characteristics
Intensive insulin therapyb 34 (63.0) 22 (75.9) 0.232
Insulin dose (U/Kg) 0.63±0.22 0.59±0.24 0.522
Lipid-lowering drugsc 25 (56.8) 11 (47.8) 0.483
ACEi or ARB used 31 (67.4) 16 (59.3) 0.484
Use of 3 or more
antihypertensive drugsd 22 (47.8) 9 (34.6) 0.277
Transplantation-related variables
Induction immunosuppression Thymoglobulin
Basiliximab OKT3
19 (34.5) 32(58.2) 4 (7.3)
12 (40.0) 15 (50.0) 3 (10.0)
0.753
Maintenance immunosupression PDN+TAC+MMF
PDN+CsA+MMF 53 (94.6)
3 (5.4) 28 (93.3)
2 (6.7) 0.805
ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker;
BMI, body mass index; BP; blood pressure; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; PDN, prednisone; SRL, sirolimus; TAC, tacrolimus; VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Table S4. Participants’ characteristics according to normalization of vibration perception thresholds at 2-3 years.
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). Only participants with abnormal VPTs at baseline and with information at 2-3 years were included (n=68).
aMissing value n=17
b Missing value n=2
c Missing value n=16
d Missing value n=12
Normalization VPTs at 2-3 years p-value No
(n=34)
Yes (n=34)
Baseline clinical characteristics
Age at transplant (years) 41.2±6.9 38.9±5.3 0.137
Gender (Male) 27 (79.4) 25 (73.5) 0.567
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.1±2.7 23.5±2.8 0.546
<25 28 (82.4) 25 (73.5) 0.483
25-29.9 6 (17.6) 8 (23.5)
³30 0 (0) 1 (2.9)
Active smokersa 8 (29.6) 8 (33.3) 0.776
Systolic BP (mmHg) 143±20 142±19 0.712
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 84±15 84±13 0.834
Diabetic retinopathy 34 (100) 34 (100) 1.000
Cardiovascular disease 12 (35.3) 7 (20.6) 0.177
Diabetes duration (years) 25.9±6.9 27.1±6.0 0.434
Patients receiving dialysis 24 (70.6) 23 (67.6) 0.793
VPTs (V) 32.0±8.6 25.1±4.1 <0.001
Baseline laboratory characteristics
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 198±66 176±32 0.133
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 128 (84-181) 112 (88-156) 0.474
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 114±37 104±26 0.253
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 49±13 52±16 0.542
HbA1c (%) 7.9±1.9 7.6±1.3 0.421
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 63±21 59±14 0.421
Baseline treatment characteristics
Intensive insulin therapyb 15 (45.5) 24 (72.7) 0.024
Insulin dose (U/Kg) 0.60±0.21 0.66±0.25 0.272
Lipid-lowering drugsc 12 (46.2) 12 (46.2) 1.000
ACEi or ARB used 17 (65.4) 20 (64.5) 0.945
Use of 3 or more
antihypertensive drugsd 14 (53.8) 11 (36.7) 0.197
Transplantation-related variables
Induction immunosuppression Thymoglobulin
Basiliximab OKT3
14 (41.2) 17 (50)
3 (8.8)
11 (34.4) 17 (53.1) 4 (12.5)
0.801
Maintenance immunosupression PDN+TAC+MMF
PDN+CsA+MMF 31 (91.2)
3 (8.8) 32 (94.1)
2 (5.9) 0.642
ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker;
BMI, body mass index; BP; blood pressure; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; PDN, prednisone; SRL, sirolimus; TAC, tacrolimus; VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Figure S1. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension during follow-up.
p-values between several points of follow-up are shown.
Figure S2. VPTs trajectories during 10 years of follow-up according to transplantation modality (SPK vs. PAK).
A: Mean values pretransplant, at 6 months, and 2-3, 5-6, and 8-10 years posttransplantation in SPK participants.
B: Mean values pretransplant, at 6 months, and 2-3, 5-6, and 8-10 years posttransplantation in PAK participants.
Mean with 95% confidence interval are shown.
p-values between several points of follow-up are shown.
PAK, pancreas after kidney; SPK, simultaneous pancreas-kidney; V, volts; VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Figure S3. Pancreas graft survival according to VPTs status only in SPK recipients.
Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration at transplantation, previous cardiovascular disease, pretransplant body mass index and systolic blood pressure. HR for abnormal VPTs, 2.19 (1.06-4.54); p=0.035.
VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Figure S4. Pancreas graft survival according to VPTs status at 6 months (A) and 2-3 years (B) only in SPK recipients.
Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration before
transplantation, previous cardiovascular disease, pretransplant body mass index, and systolic blood pressure.
A: HR for baseline abnormal – 6 months normal, 1.20 (0.36-4.01); p=0.765. HR for abnormal VPTs at 6 months, 3.30 (1.41-7.74); p=0.006.
B: HR for baseline abnormal – 2-3 years normal, 1.96 (0.72-4.88); p=0.196. HR for abnormal VPTs at 2-3 years, 2.11 (0.83-5.38); p=0.116.
VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Figure S5: CVD events during the follow-up according to baseline diabetic neuropathy.
In those without baseline DN, peripheral vascular events (n=3) consisted of n=2 minor amputations (toe) and n=1 major amputation.
In those with baseline DN, peripheral vascular events (n=13) consisted of n=6 minor amputations, n=6 major amputations and n=1 revascularization.
Figure S6. CVD-free survival according to pretransplant VPTs status only in SPK recipients.
Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration at transplantation, previous cardiovascular disease, pretransplant body mass index and systolic blood pressure. HR for abnormal VPTs, 2.57 [1.17-5.64]; p=0.018.
CVD, cardiovascular disease; VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.
Figure S7. CVD-free survival according to VPTs status at 6 months only in SPK recipients.
Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration before
transplantation, previous cardiovascular disease, pre-transplant body mass index, type of transplant (simultaneous pancreas-kidney or pancreas after kidney) and systolic blood pressure. HR for baseline abnormal – 6 months normal, 0.83 (0.21- 3.26); p=0.784. HR for abnormal VPTs at 6 months, 3.16 (1.26-7.90); p=0.014.
CVD, cardiovascular disease; VPTs, vibration perception thresholds.