• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Supplemental Table 1. Comparison of indications, management and outcomes between ‘EEG’ and ‘no-EEG’ groups.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Supplemental Table 1. Comparison of indications, management and outcomes between ‘EEG’ and ‘no-EEG’ groups."

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Supplemental Table 1. Comparison of indications, management and outcomes between ‘EEG’

and ‘no-EEG’ groups.

EEG (n=19)

no-EEG (n=30)

P value

Age, months. Median (IQR) Gender

Male Female

Indications for ECLS, n(%) Cardiac failure Respiratory failure ECPR

CPR

Vasopressors/Inotropes Vasodilators

Narcotics

Neuromuscular blockers Bicarbonate

Veno-arterial ECLS

Duration of ECLS, days, mean (SD) Survival

Discharge to rehab.

n (%) 33 (7-82)

10 (53) 9 (47)

9 (47) 5 (26) 4 (21) 10 (53) 18 (95) 9 (47) 17 (89) 16 (84) 9 (47) 17 (89) 9.7 (9.4)

13 (68) 6 (31)

n (%) 0 (0-5)

19 (63) 11 (37)

10 (33) 16 (53) 4 (13) 10 (33) 30 (100)

7 (23) 28 (93) 29 (97) 14 (47) 26 (87) 6.1 (0.21)

20 (67) 1 (3)

0.01*

1

0.11 0.44 0.29 0.29 n/a 0.15

0.7 0.31

1 1 0.21

1 0.024*

* p<0.05

(2)

Supplemental Table 2. Comparison of blood gas data between the ‘EEG’ and the ‘no-EEG’

groups, stratified by age.

EEG (n=19)

no-EEG (n=30)

p value

0 – 30 days pH

PaCO2 (mm Hg) PaO2 (mm Hg) HCO2 (mm Hg) SaO2 (%) 1 – 12 months pH

PaCO2 (mm Hg) PaO2 (mm Hg) HCO2 (mm Hg) SaO2 (%) 1 – 16 years pH

PaCO2 (mm Hg) PaO2 (mm Hg) HCO2 (mm Hg) SaO2 (%)

n=2 7.44 (0.12)

42 (8.4) 74 (15.5) 27.8 (2.4) 94.5 (0.7)

n=3 7.35 (0.11)

39.6 (13) 161 (171.4)

22.6 (10.2) 82.3 (28.8)

n=10 7.3 (0.15) 50.8 (19.9) 130.1 (132.6)

23.9 (6.9) 89 (9.6)

n=18 7.17 (0.22)

56 (17.6) 30.6 (13) 19.6 (5) 56.6 (21.8)

n=5 7.14 (0.24) 42.6 (19.6) 105 (54.7) 16.14 (8.2) 85.2 (19.9)

n=7 7.32 (0.11) 49.1 (19.6) 184.1 (173.1)

25.1 (9) 91.5 (10.9)

0.11 0.28

<0.01*

0.036*

0.027*

0.22 0.82 0.5 0.35 0.87

0.73 0.86 0.47 0.75 0.62

Data represents median (SD)

*p<0.05

(3)

Supplemental Table 3. Comparison of hemodynamic data between the ‘EEG’ and the ‘no-EEG’

groups, stratified by age.

EEG (n=19)

no-EEG (n=30)

p value

0 – 30 days SBP DBP MAP

1 – 12 months SBP

DBP MAP

1 – 16 years SBP

DBP MAP

n=2 43 (7) 34 (0) 38 (3) n=2 63 (33)

35 (2) 42 (10)

n=12 63 (33)

35 (2) 42 (10)

n=18 47 (11)

29 (9) 35 (9) n=5 58 (8) 35 (11) 43 (10) n=7 58 (8) 35 (11) 43 (10)

0.66 0.47 0.67

0.71 0.99 0.91

0.71 0.99 0.91

Data represents median (SD)

(4)

Supplemental Table 4. Comparison of complications between EEG and no-EEG groups.

EEG (n=19)

no-EEG (n=30)

P value

Complication Mechanical Hemorrhagic Renal

Cardiovascular Pulmonary Infectious Metabolic

n (%) 4 (21) 5 (26) 8 (42) 16 (84)

1 (5) 3 (16) 3 (16)

n (%) 8 (27) 9 (30) 6 (20) 25 (83)

1 (3) 2 (7) 2 (7)

0.92 1 0.18

1 0.96 0.57 0.57

The data was classified using published criteria1 as mechanical (oxygenator failure, oxygenator clots, cannula problems, heat exchanger malfunction); hemorrhagic (cannulation site bleeding, surgical site bleeding, hemolysis, GI bleed, DIC requiring transfusion); renal (creatinine between 1.5 and 3, creatinine >3 regardless of intervention, dialysis requirement, hemofiltration

requirement, continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis [CAVHD] requirement); cardiovascular (requirement for inotropes, CPR after the initiation of ECLS, myocardial stun or cardiac tamponade diagnosed by echocardiography, cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention, hypertension requiring vasodilators); pulmonary (pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage);

infectious (culture proven infections, or WBC <1500); metabolic (glucose <40 or >240; pH <7.20 or >7.60)

 

Referensi

Dokumen terkait