Page 11 Anthro Notes
WANTED: CULTURE-DEAD OR ALIVE?
The Smithsonian's
Festivalon
theMall by Richard Kurin
If
you
visitWashington, D.C. around
July4th,you
can't misstheFestival
of American
Folklife.Held
in cooperationwith theNationalPark
Service, spread outin aseaof
largewhitetents acrossthe National Mall, the Festival isan
annual living exhibitionof
culturalheritage
from around
theUnited
Statesand
theworld.Visitors
going
inand
outof
the Smithsonian'smuseums
can enjoythe exhibits dealingwith natural history, anthropology,American
history, airand
space history,and
art, but the festival's nearbytents offer a different kindof
exhibition—craftspeoplemaking and
displaying their wares; native peoples preparing indigenousfoods
tobuy and
enjoy;and
cultural specialists presenting their traditions alongside folklife specialists offering furthercommentary.
Each
festivalprogram
is akin to amuseum
exhibition,withits
own
boundariesand
space (abouttwo
football fields), labelsand
signs, stagesand
performances,and food and
craft sales.A program
usually consists
of
about100
musicians, craftspeople, cooks,and
storytellersand about
10 layand academic
presenterswho
providebackground
information, introductions, translations,and answers
to visitors' questions.In past years the Festival has featured particular nations such as India, Japan, Indonesia,
Mexico,
regions, such as theCaribbean
or theAndes;
American
ethnic cultures such asLao Americans,
RussianAmericans,
or variousAmerican
Indiantribal groups; occupational
programs
such ascowboys,
taxi drivers, Senators (as in baseball players)and
senators (as inmembers of
congress), trial lawyers,even
scientists atthe Smithsonian.If
you came
to the festival during thesummer of
1996,you would have
visited with folksfrom The American
South, Iowa,and The Smithsonian
Institution, ifyou come
thesummer of
1997,you
willfind
programs on
theMississippiDelta, AfricanImmigrants
to the U.S.,and Sacred Sounds from Around
the World.The
festival attemptsto create a physical context for the traditions represented. In the past, the Festival has included,among
other things, a race coursefrom Kentucky, an
oil rigfrom Oklahoma,
aNew
Mexican adobe
plaza, aJapanese
rice paddy, a Senegalesehome compound, and
an Indian festival village. Animals,from working
horses to llamas,from
steers to sheared sheep,have been
partof
Festivalpresentations.
A
buffalo calfwas even born on
theMall one
Festivalmorning, and an escaped
steerfinally
was roped
to theground
in theKennedy
Center parkinglot after a chasedown
ConstitutionAvenue.
Sinceitsinception, theFestival
of American
Folklife hasfeaturedmore
than sixteenthousand
musicians, artists, performers, craftspeople, workers, cooks, story tellers, ritual specialists,and
otherexemplars
from numerous
ethnic, tribal, regional,and
occupational cultures.The
Festival hashad
strongimpacts on
policies, scholarshipand
folks "backhome." Many
U.S. statesand
several nationshave
remounted
a Festivalprogram and used
it to generate laws, institutions, educationalprograms,
Page 12 Anthro Notes
documentary
films, recordings,museum and
traveling exhibits,monographs, and
cultural activities. Inmany
cases, the Festival has energized localand
regional tradition bearersand
their communities,and
thus helped conserveand
create culturalresources.The
Festival as aMuseum Display
The
Folklife Festival isone way
inwhich
theSmithsonian
hasattempted
to turnmuseology outward,
toconnect
with the publicand
itsconstituencies,
and
to include the voicesof
the represented.The
strongest featureof
the Festival is its attempt toforeground
the voicesof
tradition bearers as they demonstrate, discussand
present their cultures.For
the Smithsonian, the Festival constitutes the people'smuseum, wherein
the celebrated national treasures are the people themselves,and
their traditionalwisdom, knowledge,
skills,and
artistry.The
Festivalencourages
visitors to participate— to learn to sing, dance, eat the foodsand speak
to the folks represented in the Festivalprogram The
Festival, while celebrating
American and worldwide
diversity,
encourages
the bridgingof
differencesin a larger celebrationof freedom and human
creativity.
Beloved by
visitorsand
the general public, well-receivedby
the pressand
politicians, heartilyendorsed by
tradition-bearers, the Festivalof American
Folklifenonetheless hasits problems. Incombining and
crossing such categories as educationand
entertainment, scholarshipand
service, the authentic
and
the artificial,and
celebrationand
examination, the festival is an unfamiliargenre and can be
misconstrued.Despite the fact that
more
thanone thousand
cultural scholars
have
participated in theFestival's researchand
presentation, afew
find the Festival athrowback
to the 19th century's world's fairsand
other discreditedforms of
cultural displayand voyeurism. And
while the Festival receiveskudos
forplacingordinary people's culture
on
theNational Mall, othershave
expressed resentment at the festival'splacement on
the Mall, its implied denigrationof
traditionalmuseum
functions,and
itsalleged effect
on
the natural landscape.Living Culture on
theNation's Front Lawn
The
Festival tells the storyof
the diverse peopleswho
populate the nation, butwhose
culturalachievements
are not well represented in the Smithsonian's exhibitionsor collections.As method,
Page 13 Anthro Notes
the Festival pioneered the research-based use
of
living
performances and
demonstrations. Thiswas
consistentwith a largertrend in the
museum world
at the
time—the
useof
"living history" as a presentational or interpretive technique.Whereas
living history
performances were
acted, the Festivalemphasized
authenticity—the presenceand
participationof
the living peoplewho were
activeand exemplary
practitionersof
the representedcommunities and
traditions.In
Search
of aGenre
Why
call thisphenomenon
a festival? In theWashingtonian scheme of
things, the Festivalof American
Folklifedoes
operate like a festival. Itcreates its
own
spaceon
the Mall, asometimes
jarring presence inthe midst
of
official, neat space.Itcreates a face-to-face
community
intheshadows
ofinanimateofficial buildingsand
the institutionsof
state.
The
Festival is messy, its boundariesof
participation, time
and
event unclear.The
Festival createsan experienceand eventthat areintense, but short-lived, inwhich
representations are magnified,pushed
together,and
then, just as quickly, dispersed.And
itbringspeopletogether—
tradition-bearers, the public, scholars, officials, administrators, builders, designers, volunteers,
and
others
who would
not normally interact.As Margaret Mead once
wrote, the Festival is "a people-to-people celebration inwhich
allof
us are participants—now
as organizers,now
as celebrators,now
as audience, as hostsand
as guests, asfriendsand
neighbors or as strangers finding thatwe can speak
thesame language of mutual enjoyment" (Redbook,
July 1975).The
Festival hasalways
navigatedbetween
the variousaxesof
art (asentertainment), cultural rights (as advocacy), education (as public service),and knowledge
(as scholarshipand
experience). It hasfrom
the beginningsought
tobroaden knowledge, deepen
appreciation,and
increase support for artforms and
practitionersoverlooked
in a societywhose
senseof beauty and
value isgenerally drivenby
the exerciseof power and
the influenceof
the marketplace.At
times duringits history,and even
within thesame
yearamong
itsprograms,
presentationsand
framinghave
gravitatedtoward one
oranotheraxis.But by and
large, the Festival's form, contexts, purposes,and
placehave remained
the same.Cultural Representation
While
the Festival, insome
literalway, may
recall 19th centuryforms of
cultural exhibitionism, it has benefitedfrom decades of
cultural researchand
discussionsabout
representation to evolve intosomething
quite different. Shifts in authoritative voice, collaborationin self-representation, treatmentof contemporary
contexts, as well as theforms of
discourse,have
significantly changed, thanks in largepartto theeffortsof
peoplelikeRalph
Rinzler,Bess Lomax Hawes,
BerniceReagon, and
a generationof
culturalworkers who have
labored at the intersectionof
scholarship, culturalcommunity advocacy, and
public education. Large-scale cultural displays are situated in a publicworld
inwhich
various partieshave
a stake. Politicians,advocacy
groups, rebels,and
scholarsmay
usetheseforms
toforward
theirown
agendas,and have
become
very sophisticated indoing
so, as readily apparent in various case studiesof
Festival programs.Page 14 Anthro Notes
As
a representational genre, living cultural exhibitions likethe Festival share featureswiththe zoo, the local fair, atown
meeting,an
object-basedmuseum
exhibit, an ethnographicmonograph,
atalk show,and
adocumentary
film.The
Festival differsfrom
abook, film,exhibitand
concert inthatit lacks linearity.While
the Festival hassome
highlighted special events, a daily scheduleand
structuredforms of
presentation,many
eventshappen
simultaneously.Not everyone
experiences thesame
thing.The
Festival offers the opportunity, indeed the desirability, for
people —visitors, staff, participants
—
to charttheirown
experiential routesthrough
it.The
densityof
thecrowd,
the symbolicweight of
the locationand
the significanceof
the JulyFourth
holiday helpmake
thisexperiencememorable. Most
distinctively, the Festival offers the
immediacy and
sentient presence
of
people possessedof knowledge,
skill
and wisdom, who
canand do speak
for themselves.At
the Festival,many
different people speakinavarietyof
voicesand styles.For
themost
part, the authority to
speak and
the contentof
thatspeech
is diffuseand
sharedamong
participant, scholar/curator,and
visitor.anniversary celebrationina mile-longBirthday Party held for
some 600,000 people on
theNationalMall on August
10-11, 1996.Some of
the Smithsonian ancestorsmight have been
quite surprised, but Ithink ultimately heartened, to learn that the Festival genre, historically
used
to represent others,had become
a successfulmeans of
representing ourselves.For Further Reading
Kurin, Richard,
Brokering
Culture.Washington:
SmithsonianInstitutionPress, 1997.
(An expanded
versionof
this article constitutes the chapter titled"The
Festivalon
theMall.")Festival
of American
FolklifeProgram Book.
Washington. Smithsonian Institution.
Essays
inthe annualProgram Book
discuss complexitiesand dimensions of
the Folklife Festival.See
especially essaysby Richard Kurin from 1990-1996.
Richard Kurin
is Directorof
the Smithsonian'sCenter for
Folklifeand
CulturalPrograms
Despite thechallenges to
and
questions about it, the Festivalof American
Folklife continues to representour American and human
cultural heritage, presenting it to a large audience in an educationalway,
connecting it to real peopleand communities
in
ways
thatenhance
the national civic cultureof
our democratic society. In addition, the Festivalon
the Mallcontinues to provideamodel
for localities, states,and
other nations to present grassroots cultural expressionsto theirown
citizenry.It is
no
surprise thatmany
othereventshave drawn
inspiration
and
lessonsfrom
the Smithsonian's FolklifeFestival—from
theBlack Family Reunion
to the L.A. Festival,from
a Festivalof Hawaiian
Culture to an Indigenous Cultureand Development
Festival inEcuador,