• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Undergraduate Industrial and Product Design Pedagogy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Undergraduate Industrial and Product Design Pedagogy"

Copied!
107
0
0

Teks penuh

This thesis aims to provide the historical context of design education curricula, debates in design history surrounding the content, and contemporary practices of curriculum design and classroom pedagogy in order to assess best practices in successfully integrating critical studies into design education. Some approaches to teaching history have included presenting a canon of "great works" (providing a deep knowledge base for their field of study), revealing the complexities in the social and political contexts in which design is produced, and offering a chronological understanding of design evolution in order to evoke in the design student critical point of view.2 Despite the importance of history to the design student, the courses are perceived as a chore, often prompting students to answer, "What is the value of this?" 3. Williams and Janice Rieger, "A Design History of Design: Complexity, Criticality, And Cultural Competence," RACAR : Revue D'art Canadienne 40, no.

The thesis will deal with the pedagogy of the history of art and design for students of industrial and product design. Both of these factors have contributed greatly to the general philosophy of design education and influenced why, how, and what design students should or should not be exposed to in history courses in their education. I assess three aspects of the content of design history: design as a verb, the abandonment of technology and economic history, and debates about what constitutes "good" design.

The first-person interviews consist of design history professors from a variety of backgrounds (including art history, design history, and design practice) who all teach at different institutions and therefore within different curricula. If the aim is to expand the practitioner's critical considerations of design in a wider context, social, economic and cultural, to train a more critical designer, how can all these variables be assessed to determine the most effective way lead to achieve these goals.

Content, Pedagogy, and Curriculum in Historical Case Studies: Influential Frameworks of Design Education

Before the emergence of design education, a highly developed system of guilds laid the foundation for a designer's training in the early days of the Industrial Revolution. In the mid-19th century, Great Britain emerged as a leading power among industrializing nations. 20 Gordon Sutton, Artisan or Artist?: A History of the Teaching of Art and Crafts in English Schools (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967), 57.

The School of Architecture of the École des Beaux-Arts was founded in 1671 and was the first national government-sponsored design school in France. Cret, “The École des Beaux-Arts and Architectural Education,” The Journal of the American Society of Architectural Historians 1, no Found in the final presentations by the students, history was used as a vehicle for the students'.

It is the idea of ​​"formal copying" that came under scrutiny in the 20th century and was eliminated in the schools of the modernist. From the latter half of the 19th century, Chicago was a leading city in the United States, both economically and culturally. He integrated the art disciplines and emphasized the connection between art of the past and the present.

In an essay by Leonard Calder, chair of the history department at Augustana College, titled

Figure 1. Walter Gropius, Bauhaus Curriculum Wheel, 1923. Bauhaus Archive
Figure 1. Walter Gropius, Bauhaus Curriculum Wheel, 1923. Bauhaus Archive

Content in Design History: The Field of Design History’s Impact on Design Education

We Demand sweeping curriculum reform, departing from the westernized and outdated form of art and design education that are inclusive only to some

Many of the canons required in design history curricula, as well as the histories available in course catalogs, highlight these issues that BAAD students illustrated. This has resulted in a call for more comprehensive historical scholarship in the field of design history and in design education there. Second, it means the deliberate evaluation of works presented in the design history course and the active engagement of new scholarship on underrepresented identities in the canons of design history.

This is especially important for introductory design history courses, as these sometimes serve as the only “formal exposure” to the field of design history, echoing what the BAAD students requested above.156 Attempts to correct such an underrepresented canon can do that. 154 Hazel Clark & ​​David Brody, “The Current State of Design History,” 306; Lichtman, “Reconsidering the History of Design Survey,” 347. Related to the development of a canon that includes predominantly Western, male histories is the idea of ​​the “history of celebration,” or history of economic successes related to design as sales. 158 This is not only due to the underlying objectives of design education as it developed in the US.

Much design history scholarship has come from auction houses, leaving us with a canon that reflects expensive products and economic success in the design market. Riccini notes that this view seems to be persistent in the formation of design histories, that established histories reinforce the notion that "industrial design is seen as a 'cosmetic' function" and the view that "design as a styling of the appearance of products is a serious misunderstanding of the actual work of the designer.”163 The points raised by Forty are important in the context of a history of design developed for design students.

While Margolin countered that he thinks "Forty overestimates the value of design history in contributing to this process," the pedagogical connection cannot be ignored. There are many issues in the field of design history, including methods, content, and established historiographical techniques. Design education has similar problems and the intersection between the two is attempted to play out in the content covered in design history courses.

While there have been calls for design history to be understood as broadly as possible, not only for the purpose of inclusivity, but also to accommodate the ever-evolving definitions of design, this is not necessarily the case. As the definition of design changes as quickly as people develop their built environment, this further complicates whether historic classrooms are sufficiently reflective of contemporary professional practice (even to match different studio themes) to cover relevant content outside the typical canon, such as “history of military hardware; street lamps, mailboxes, control technology and interface design.” 169 Or even the topics of consumer electronics, sustainability or smart objects. We should value precisely that work that seeks to expand our understanding of design activity." See Maffei, "The Production-Consumption-Mediation Paradigm Margolin, "Design History or Design Studies," 10-13;.

Pedagogy and Curricula Today: A Survey of Methods Used in the Deployment of Design History courses

As Lichtman provoked, "As design historians we need to rethink our own assumptions and expectations of the history of design survey and find ways to instrumentalize the. One of the ways he illustrates this is how he conveys the content to the design students, leaning on a narrative around the process: Not only does he believe it should be part of the canon, but as a professional in the design field he identifies this aspect of Design History as one of the most important lessons from history for a student of design because it makes the course "usable".

One of the most obvious symptoms of historical precedent in design education is the emphasis on art history courses, especially at private universities. Again, while it is like the existing structures, this positioning of the survey under The Design Profession allows for a nuanced introduction to the content and historical position, potentially prompting deeper learning and critique in the surveys during their new year, History of Design I and II. . While there is much work to be done in the selection of history course content, issues in content should, at least in part, be informed by the curricular marriage and deliberate fusion of history courses and design studios.

Raizman and Bird, historians and practitioners, agree that open-ended inquiries or qualitative assignments produce much better student results at the end of the semester. By redesigning curricula, reviewing our methods and content in teaching history to design students, and evaluating the outcomes of students conducting such experiments, we can continue the evolution of design education that has been. discontinued in the middle of the 20th century. Departments | Cooper Hewitt Collection, Smithsonian Design Museum. https://www.collegevaluesonline.com/rankings/industrial-design-degrees-top-undergraduate/. 34; School of Design, Carnegie Mellon University.” Undergraduate Diplomas.

34; Design and the New Rhetoric: Productive Arts in Cultural Philosophy. "Philosophy and Rhetoric 34, no. 34; The École Des Beaux-Arts and architectural education." Journal of the USn Society of Architectural Historians 1, no. 34; Design education and industry: the troubled beginnings of the Institute of Design in Chicago in Journal of Design History 4, no.

34;The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Great Britain, France and India." The Journal of Economic History 69, No. 34;Schools for Industrial Democrats: The Social Origins of John Dewey's Philosophy of Education." U.S.n Journal of Education 100, No. Each section provides a snapshot of the institution's required liberal arts courses, with the required history courses listed first and the supporting required liberal arts courses below.

Figure 4. David Raizman, Slides for History of Modern Design Course, sets of questions are  different for each course
Figure 4. David Raizman, Slides for History of Modern Design Course, sets of questions are different for each course

Gambar

Figure 1. Walter Gropius, Bauhaus Curriculum Wheel, 1923. Bauhaus Archive
Figure 2. William G. Whitford, Illustration of arts and practical training education merger in the  early 20th century, in "An Introduction to Art Education"
Figure 3. Moholy Nagy, Curriculum Wheel, 1937. Bauhaus Archive.
Figure 4. David Raizman, Slides for History of Modern Design Course, sets of questions are  different for each course
+2

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

CONTENTS Page number Compulsory declaration ii Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Contents vi List of tables and figures xi CHAPTER 1 – Introduction 1 1.1 Research

TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Abstract iv Table of Contents v List of Figures vi List of Tables xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Description of the Reactor System