VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 6 ADDRESSING SOLAR IRRADIANCE INTERMITTENCY IN PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEMS WITH INTEGRATED ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING
CAPABILITY
Ms. Shiwangi Saini Asst. Prof., GGITS Jabalpur
Ms. Ritu Sharma Asst. Prof., GGITS Jabalpur
Surbhi Shrivastava UG Student, GGITS Jabalpur
Sourav Katarya
UG Student, GGITS Jabalpur
Abstract- Relief of the changeability in yield force of sustainable generators, for example, sun powered photovoltaic (PV) frameworks is a developing worry as these generators arrive at higher entrances on electric networks. Moreover, expanded infiltration of electric vehicle (EV) loads presents a test for circulation feeders. The high-voltage dc bus of a PV inverter is connected to the EV battery by a bidirectional, highly efficient dc–dc EV charger, as shown in this paper. By providing the EV battery with quick charging from the PV system, the system reduces feeder overloading in part. Moreover, the charger is fit for redirecting quick changes in PV power result to the battery, subsequently decreasing the pace of progress of inverter yield capacity to a level beneath the slope pace of existing network assets. The paper tends to estimating of the charger and energy stockpiling in view of the PV framework rating, the ideal greatest slope rate, and site sun powered light qualities, including geographic scattering of PV exhibits.
Examination proposes that modest quantities of energy stockpiling can achieve enormous decreases in yield power slope rate. Trial results are displayed for a 10 kW, 98% productive dc charger in light of bidirectional four-stage zero-voltage- exchanging converter.
Keyword: Battery charger, electric vehicle, energy capacity, framework mix, photovoltaic framework.
1. INTRODUCTION
Worries over environment, energy security, and rising fuel costs have prodded developing interest in transportation charge and in age of electric power from sustainable assets. Nonetheless, sustainable assets, for example, photovoltaic (PV) power frameworks, display extremely high fluctuation in yield power,
particularly in areas with continuous passing mists. Utility and power transformation enterprises are getting ready for the network joining difficulties of expanding sustainable sources, for example, the impacts of unexpected, huge vacillations in a PV framework's result power. The efficiency of the response time and
VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 7 Fig. 1. Grid-interactive inverter architecture with constant dc-link voltage,
and battery charger banks. Note that the LC filter at the output of the subcombiner is designed to attenuate switching frequency harmonics and does not affect the stability of the inverter voltage control or charger current
control, both of which have significantly lower bandwidth.
assistant diesel power generators can be on the request for several seconds or longer, which may not be quickly enough to make up for the fluctuation of these inexhaustible sources.
Previous research looked at the negative effects that PV variability can have on localized power quality. These effects can include flicker, frequency instability in small grids, increased wear on conventional voltage regulator equipment (like autotap transformers), and, in extreme cases, deviations from ANSI voltage and frequency limits. These impacts present a significant test to higher infiltration of PV, especially at the dissemination level.
The incorporation of energy storage into PV systems as a means of mitigating solar irradiance interference on short time scales of tens of seconds is the primary focus of this paper. In the framework un-der thought, which is displayed in Fig. 1, the energy stockpiling capability is
given by module cross breed electric vehicle (PHEV or EV) batteries through bidirectional dc chargers coordinated inside a customary PV framework that incorporates a high- voltage dc transport between the subcombiner and the inverter. The DC transport gives a helpful highlight reconciliation of dc ve-hicle chargers, exploiting the generally present inverter foundation for association with the lattice. The dc transport can likewise be utilized as a flagging medium to switch between framework associated and islanding modes. The consolidated PV/charger ar-chitecture offers various expected benefits, including capacities for quick and
productive dc charging
straightforwardly from a sustainable source or from the framework and possibilities for cost re-duction as a similar bidirectional inverter equipment is divided among PV and charger capabilities. The essential capability of network tied PV inverters
VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 8 is to convey genuine capacity to the
framework as ef-ficiently as conceivable at solidarity power factor.
It is important to research how the abilities of PV frameworks with energy capacity can be utilized to offer extra network support capabilities. For instance, PV framework with energy capacity is utilized to re-duce the slope pace of the power conveyed by the PV framework to the matrix within the sight of quick varieties in sun based irradiance. The targets of this paper are to broaden this earlier concentrate by analyzing the power rating of the power hardware and the en-ergy capacity expected to achieve successful incline rate control. In addition, the paper demonstrates how basic PV/charger functions and the mitigation of intermittent solar irradiance can be achieved in the system depicted in Figure by presenting related control and dc charger implementation techniques.
1.
Figure depicts the system's typical operation. 1 is as per the following. The inverter controls the dc transport voltage by sending out capacity to the framework and instructing the charger to sink or source capacity to or from the vehicle battery. During radiant circumstances the charger redirects a portion of the PV current to charge the vehicle battery, in this way putting no extra burden on framework foundation.
Assuming a cloud ignores the exhibit, the inverter orders the charger to diminish the current to the battery or even source current from the battery to restrict the fluctuation of the inverter out-put power, like mode III.
After the short transient, the charger gets back to an ordinary charging
calculation, in this manner en-suring that the vehicle battery is charged in roughly a similar measure of time as it would utilizing a framework associated charger. Moreover, the adjustment of battery condition of charge (SoC) during the transient can be kept to a base to stay away from critical im-settlement on battery duration. From a vehicle proprietor's viewpoint, the vehicle is being charged from spotless, sustainable power.
From a lattice administrator's point of view, diminished changeability of PV yield power means decreased turning save prerequisites and more prominent matrix soundness, particularly on networks with high infiltrations of environmentally friendly power.
2. ANALYSIS OF A PV SYSTEM WITH ENERGY STORAGE
The PV framework engineering displayed in Fig. 1 purposes a controlled dc-connect voltage with dc converters to interact various PV
Fig. 2. PV/EV charger system configured to limit the rate of change of inverter output power
using a high-pass filter H(s) to generate an ac reference current for
the charger.
strings to the dc bus, enabling each string to operate at its own MPP. The consistent dc-connect voltage PV framework is normally reached out to
VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 9 incorporate bidirectional dc converters
that point of interaction with PHEV batteries. An improved on block outline of the framework with a solitary dc charger is displayed in Fig.
2. The dc charger associated with the framework dc transport and the PHEV battery are designed to restrict the pace of progress of inverter yield power, as a lattice support capability.
To achieve this capability, the PV yield current ipv is detected and high-pass sifted by H(s) to create an air conditioner reference for the charger current charge. This matrix support capability can be joined with a quick battery charging capability, by setting the battery dc charging current to an ideal worth, as examined further in Segments III and IV.
3 CONCLUSION
This paper tends to mix of an EV dc charger inside a PV power framework.
A dc–dc charger inserted between an EV and a dc bus voltage of a PV system can improve grid integration by reducing the ramp rate of the PV inverter's output power and simultaneously offer fast, high- efficiency EV battery charging directly from the PV system, according to system analysis and experimental results. The network support incline rate decrease is achieved by a first-or second-request high-pass channel applied to the PV cluster/MPPT yield current to redirect quick drifters from the inverter and into the vehicle battery. A procedure is introduced for estimating the dc charger and the battery in view of the size of the PV cluster, the ideal greatest slope rate, and site insolation burn acteristics.
According to the analysis, even a modest amount of energy storage can
result in significant decreases in the output power slew rate. For instance, having 0.05 kWh of energy stockpiling per kW of evaluated PV power can diminish the most extreme pace of progress of inverter yield capacity to under 10% per min, even at a site with profoundly factor PV yield.
Because SoC swings are small, impacts on battery life are limited even assuming a significantly larger EV battery.
Aproto type 10-kW 575-to-250- V bidirectional dc charger has been built to tentatively approve the PV/EV charger idea in blend with a 10-kWh LiFePO4 EV battery introduced in a Toyota Prius and the 100-kW Satcon Solstice inverter. A 30 kHz, four- phase, zero-voltage-switching quasi- square-wave synchronous buck converter serves as the foundation for the dc–dc charger. Lab tests show that the dc charger with PI repaid normal current control is fit for executing the separating procedure with high proficiency (up to 98%) across many working focuses.
REFERENCES
1. S. A. Zabalawi, G. Mandic, and A. Nasiri,
“Utilizing energy storage with PV for residential and commercial use,” in Proc. IEEE 34th Annu. Conf. Ind.
Electron., Nov. 10–13, 2008, pp. 1045–
1050.
2. E. C. Kern, Jr., E. M. Gulachenski, and G. A. Kern, “Cloud effects on distributed photovoltaic generation: Slow transients at the Gardner, Mas- sachusetts photovoltaic experiment,” IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 184–
190, Jun. 1989.
3. L. F. Casey, C. Schauder, J. Cleary, andM. Ropp, “Advanced inverters fa- cilitate high penetration of renewable generation on medium voltage feed- ers - impact and benefits for the utility,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Innovative Technol.
VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 10
Efficient Reliable Electr. Supply, Sep.
27–29, 2010, pp. 86–93.
4. G. Ari and Y. Baghzouz, “Impact of high PV penetration on voltage regulation in electrical distribution systems,” in Proc.
Int. Conf. Clean Electr. Power, Jun. 14–
16, 2011, pp. 744–748.
5. L. Liu, H. Li, Z. Wu, and Y. Zhao, “A cascaded photovoltaic system inte- grating segmented energy storages with self-regulating power allocation control and wide range reactive power compensation,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3545–
3559, Dec. 2011.
6. J. Traube, F. Lu, and D. Maksimovic,
“Electric vehicle DC charger inte- grated within a photovoltaic power system,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf.
Expo., Feb. 5–9, 2012, pp. 352–358.
7. J.Mossoba,M. Kromer, P. Faill, S. Katz, B. Borowy, S. Nichols, L. Casey, D.
Maksimovic, J. Traube, and F. Lu,
“Analysis of solar irradiance inter- mittency mitigation using constant DC voltage PV and EV battery stor- age,” in Proc. IEEE Transp. Electrification Conf.
Expo., 2012.
8. K. Sun, L. Zhang, Y. Xing, and J. M.
Guerrero, “A distributed control strategy based on DC bus signaling for modular photovoltaic genera- tion systems with battery energy storage,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 10, pp.
3032–3045, Oct. 2011.
9. S. K. Kim, J. H. Jeon, C. H. Cho, J. B.
Ahn, and S. H. Kwon, “Dynamic modeling and control of a grid-connected hybrid generation system with versatile power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1677–1688, Apr. 2008.
10. C. A. Hill, M. C. Such, D. Chen, J.
Gonzalez, and W. M. Grady, “Bat- tery energy storage for enabling integration of distributed solar power generation,”
IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 850–857, Jun. 2012.
11. Univ. of Hawaii, Hawaii Natural Energy Inst., School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technol., Oahu Wind Integration Study: Final Rep. Award # DE-FC26- 06NT42847, Subtask 10.1. Feb. 2011 2013.
12. Natl. Renewable Energy Lab.
Measurement and Inform. Data Center.
(2011, Jun.). Solar Resource and Meteorological Assessment Project (SOLRMAP). Data from Kalaeloa Oahu, Hawaii. [Online]. Available:
http://www.nrel.gov/midc
13. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2012, Jul. 4). “NREL:
MIDC/Oahu Irradiance Grid,” [Online].
Available:
http://www.nrel.gov/midc/oahu_archiv e/
14. K. Rosenkranz, “Deep-cycle batteries for plug-in hybrid application,” presented at the Plug-In Hybrid Veh. Workshop, Long Beach, CA, 2003.
15. C.-S. N. Shiau, S. B. Peterson, and J. J.
Michalek, “Optimal plug-in hy- brid electric vehicle design and allocation for minimum life cycle cost, petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 132, pp.
1–11, 2010.
16. S. B. Peterson, J. Apt, and J.
F.Whitacre, “Lithium-ion battery cell degra- dation resulting from realistic vehicle and vehicle-to-grid utilization,” J.
Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 8, pp.
2385–2392, Apr. 2010.
17. K. Smith, T. Markel, G.-H. Kim, and A.
Pesaran, “Design of electric drive vehicles for long life and low cost,”
presented at the IEEE Workshop Accelerated Stress Testing Rel.,, Denver, CO, Oct. 2010, PaperNREL/PR- 540- 48933.
18. A. Hoke, A. Brissette, D. Maksimovic, A.
Pratt, and K. Smith, “Electric vehicle charge optimization including effects of lithium-ion battery degra- dation,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicle Power Propulsion Conf., Sep. 6–9, 2011, pp. 1–8.
19. A. Millner, “Modeling Lithium Ion battery degradation in electric vehi- cles,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Innovative Technol.
Efficient Reliable Elect. Supply, Sep. 27–
29, 2010, pp. 349–356.
20. A. Millner, N. Judson, B. Ren, E.
Johnson, and W. Ross, “Enhanced plug- in hybrid electric vehicles,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Innovative Technol. Efficient Reliable Elect. Supply, Sep. 27–29, 2010, pp. 333–340.
21. W. Yu and J. S. Lai, “Ultra high efficiency bidirectional DC-DC converter with multi-frequency pulse width modulation,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power
VOLUME: 09, Special Issue 07, Paper id-IJIERM-IX-VII, October 2022 11
Electron. Conf. Expo., Feb. 24–28, 2008, pp. 1079–1084.
22. D. Maksimovic, “Design of the zero- voltage-switching quasi-square-wave resonant switch,” in Proc. IEEE Power
Electron. Spec. Conf., Jun. 20–24, 1993, pp. 323–329.
23. R. W. Erickson and D. Maksimovic, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2001.