AN ANALYTICAL RESEARCH BASED ON WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUE FOR ENVIRONMENT SAFETY: A REVIEW
Shivbhan Patel
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Prof. Rajesh Joshi
Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) 1 INTRODUCTION
Water is the excellent part of the climate and is the spirit of the Earth. It is additionally named as the solution of life.
Water exists on planet earth as vaporous, fluid and strong and is flowed via planetary and sun oriented powers.
Sacred texts uncover that all living life forms have started from the hydrosphere.
Individuals are the particular inventive of God. Human body contains around 75%
of water in the mass of the body and generally every one of the human organs have water content from 22% to 96%. A grown-up, weighing around 75 kg, expects 2 to 3 kg of water consistently for typical physiological exercises.
Of the worldwide water capability of 1.37 108 million ha-m, around 97.20%
have been appropriated in the sea as pungent water, and 2.80% as new water.
Out of the 2.8% new water around 2.20%
is viewed as surface water and 0.60%
shows up as ground water. Indeed, even out of this 2.20% of surface water, 2.15%
is as icy masses and ice covers and just in the request for 0.01% is accessible in lakes and supplies. Streams represent just 0.001% and the excess amount is available as water fume in air (0.001%) and as soil dampness in the top soil up to 0.6m (0.002%).
It is assessed that the water interest in India will increment from the momentum necessity of 710 BCM to 1180 BCM constantly 2050, at the current populace development of 1.91% each year. The modern and homegrown water utilization is likewise expected to increment practically 2.50 times sooner rather than later.
1.1 Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Contingent on the kind of contaminations and impurities evacuation, the water treatment technique will be chosen as ordinary water treatment strategy and Advanced water treatment technique.
1.1.1 Conventional Water Treatment Method
Traditional water treatment plant can eliminate smell, Algal development, variety somewhat, iron, manganese, suspended molecule and colloidal particles. A common water treatment plant involves Pre chlorination, plain sedimentation, Aeration, Coagulation and Flocculation, Sedimentation and Clarification, Filtration and sterilization courses of action.
The unit situation in the water treatment strategies and pollutants expulsion is recorded in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Water Treatment Methods Sl. No. Operation Impurities Removed
1. Plain sedimentation Larger and heavier solids 2. Pre chlorination Ammonia, Algal growth 3. Aeration Dissolved gases CO2, H2S etc.
Dissolved minerals like iron, manganese and magnesium
Dissolved organic matter causing bad tastes and odour.
4. Coagulation, Flocculation
and Sedimentation Smaller and lighter suspended solids
5. Filtration Fine suspended and colloidal matter and some living organism including bacteria
6. Disinfection Killing of living pathogenic organisms (protozoa, virus, bacteria etc).
7. Chemicals Dissolved minerals, other organic materials, salts causing hardness, precipitation of iron, manganese, fluorides, pH balancing etc.
1.2 Objective of this Study
Water treatment ooze and the buildups is a known natural concern and dealing with the removal plan is serious issue everywhere. In India, for the most part all the water supply frameworks are being kept up with by government organizations. Giving safe drinking water to people in general isn't just the obligation of the water delivering organizations. However, it is likewise the obligation of the specialists to a protected, monetary and natural cordial discard the oozes and deposits created by the WTPS.
In India, the expert and naturally safe removal choices are not polished. Since the coagulant 'Alum' is utilized to treat the turbidity of the crude water, enormous amount of WTP ooze is created alongside water and taking care of these muck is a significant issue. This colossal volume of WTP slime is unloaded into water courses, as it is the least expensive method of removal. Accordingly gigantic volume of water is squandered alongside ooze. It is unreasonable to proceed with this training, since the qualities of the crude water will corrupt at the downstream of the water course. Because of absence of consciousness of guidelines, the activity and support organizations are arranging the enormous volume of ooze produced in the WTP and without realizing the potential risks caused because of their release into the water bodies. There are additionally many drilled imperatives for arranging the WTP muck through different strategies like land accessibility, method of transportation and their expense, trouble in taking care of ooze in the fluid structure, long haul impact of weighty metal fixation on soil and other natural and biological variables.
In this proposition, these issues are tended to by investigating the chance of (I) using the WTP slime on squander water treatment and thus financial worth of the ooze is reused. (ii) strategies to diminish the expense of treatment of the wastewater produced as sewage from a local area.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction
Water treatment is the logical mediation by which inordinate foreign substances can be taken out and the treated water will meet the drinking water quality norms. Water refinement process produces squanders which are dangerous to general wellbeing and the climate. The sythesis of the WTP slime is relying upon different factors like hydrology, hydrogeology, geography of the stream bowl, toxins blended in with the streaming water, human and modern exercises in the catchment region, development of phytoplankton's and zooplanktons in the water body and the synthetic substances utilized in the water decontamination process and so forth.
The water treatment plant slime is an inescapable result of the water treatment process. It is a central issue to arrange the WTP muck in a safe and ecologically maintainable way. The expanded popular for drinking water accordingly expansion in WTP ooze creation. The deposits of WTP slime and its hazardness could have been produced by soil disintegration in the upstream sides, normal developments of water streaming bed, synthetic compounds engaged with the expulsion cycle urges a protected and right removal, to stay away from adverse consequence on the climate.
2.2 Chemicals Used for Coagulation For water treatment process, metal coagulant, for example, Alum and Ferric alum are ordinarily utilized as coagulants and flocculants. These coagulants are anyway delicate to pH and alkalinity of the crude water and may cause inversion of turbidity at gluts. The streamlined measurement of compound coagulants from the flocs and settling happens in four structures like discrete particles, woolly, ruined and pressure. The primary power liable for settling is the gravitational power and is conceivable in earth planet as it were. Natural polyelectrolyte was utilized as coagulant supports mix with aluminum salts which upgrade the viability of the customary coagulants. Utilization of these poly electrolytes was confined in view of their greater expense. Polyamine, tannins, poly DADMAC, melamine formaldehydes are
instances of the natural coagulants. In Europe, an inorganic poly electrolic was created called Poly Aluminum Chloride (PAC). This has been acknowledged in numerous nations since it is major areas of strength for a with decent response speed brought about a huge improvement in the nature of the treated water.
Alum is considered as the primary coagulant of decision in light of its lower cost and its far and wide accessibility. The expense of PAC is around 5 to multiple times higher than Alum and thus despite the fact that PAC has a higher productivity of turbidity expulsion, it isn't generally utilized. Further, Aluminum based coagulants are crypto oocyst (hard shell covering parasite) expulsion as opposed to ferric based synthetics. The main limit of iron based coagulants is that they consume greater alkalinity compacted to alum.
2.3 Chemistry of Coagulation
The crude water contains suspended matter which incorporates settle able solids and scattered solids. Evacuation of the suspended matter is one of the means engaged with the water filtration process.
An extensive piece of non-settle able solids might be colloidal since the colloidal particles are of adversely charged particles, they repeal the adjoining particles and keeps the particles from full scale size huge masses. Accordingly, these particles don't settle. Coagulation is a cycle by which the impact created by the expansion of a synthetic to a colloidal scattering, bringing about molecule destabilization, by killing the powers that keep them separated. This is accomplished by the expansion of proper synthetic and quick serious blending for getting uniform scattering of the compound. Flocculation is the second phase of the development of settle able particles from weakened colloidal measured particles and is accomplished by delicate and delayed blending. The coagulation and flocculation cycle and muck arrangement are shown in Figure 2.1.
Aluminum sulfate is regularly known as alum. Its synthetic structure is Al2(SO4)3.18H2O. This coagulants when blended in with turbid water, structure charged types of metal particle mostly
monomeric, oligomeric, polymeric and insoluble hydroxide accelerates like Al(OH)3. Alum basically contains generally in oligomeric structures
Figure 2.1 Mechanism of WTP Sludge Formation
Aluminum hydroxide (Eqn. 2.1 and Eqn.
2.2) and ferrous hydroxide (Equation 2.5), so shaped is a thick encourage and colloids with the colloidal adversely charged matter present in water. The decidedly charged alum kill the adversely charged colloidal matter there by empowering particles to contact and fill in to large scale size, and this at last prompt
settling of particles because of gravitational power.
The approximated amount of slop produced in WTPs situated in various
nations as announced by different specialists which is given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Quantity of Sludge Reported in Prior Works
2.4 Practices in Sludge Disposal
In numerous nations the momentum practice of arranging the WTP ooze is straightforwardly arranging into the close by water course. They comprehensively examined under the classifications of helpful reuse in assembling of development materials, land removal, further develop particulate contamination expulsion from sewage. As of now the muck is being arranged either in a water body or in land application or for some gainful use. The act of arranging the ooze in to the normal water bodies or into the sewage network passing close by the WTP site. Concerning removal the muck is
being arranged into the horticultural land or utilized as waste land filling. In the helpful reuse technique, from the WTP slime could be utilized as an unrefined substance for oven block fabricating and utilized for squander land filling. It can likewise be utilized for building wet land and utilized for primary soil. Further the coagulants from the muck could be recuperated and reused. It can likewise be utilized as an adsorption of contamination in squander water treatment. Numerous muck removal choices as of now distinguished and proposed by different researchers are introduced in Figure 2.2.
Figure 2.2 Sludge Disposal Methods 2.5 Prior Study on WTP Sludge Disposal
and Reuse Options
Warriner et al., (1972) concentrated on that generally in all the WTPS, the Aluminum part in alum slime has been viewed as steady in the waste created.
Hsu D.Y., et al., (1973) made sense of the impact of Aluminum hydroxide on essential waste water treatment progress. It has been presumed that if the mathematical, water driven and activity condition in the essential settling tank are such consolidated that there is no deficiency of muck from the over stream weir and assuming there is no unfriendly impact on the absorption of the slop, the removal of alum slime in to the sewer is supported.
Salatto, et al., (1973) surveyed the water utility ooze on the actuated cycle.
CPHEEO manual examined different techniques for squander water treatment and removal.
Montgomery et al., (1975) concentrated on that a controlled release of alum slop in to a sewer framework is to be observed properly during ooze move.
Culp and Wilson (1979) called attention to that no unfriendly consequences for generally squander water treatment plant while adding alum slime.
Diamadopolous, E., et al., (1984) made sense of that by advancement and utilization of polymeric inorganic coagulants, the coagulation execution with Al or Fe coagulants, can be improved for eliminating the two particles and broke down natural matters. Compound precipitation and coagulation are normally involved techniques for eliminating phosperous from water.
Montgoery, J.M., et al., (1985) concentrated on the water treatment rule and plans.
Peavy, H.S., et al., (1985) portrayed the interaction and strategies for squander water treatment and settling standards of particulate matter.
Watanebe et al., (1987) found that reusing of alum slime in essential settling tank could work on the thickening and dewatering skill of the joined slop.
APHA standard techniques for assessment of water and waste water showed the strategy and techniques for analyzing the water and waste water. The guidelines for arranging the effluents into the water and land have likewise been examined.
Elliott and Dempsey (1991) announced that muck has somewhat low natural impact while thinking about the agronomic impacts of land application. It was led that however land removal is the
most un-capital concentrated technique, the transportation costs adding to the in general functional expense made it illogical.
Matsuda, A., et al., (1992) made sense of that the actual cycle can essentially further develop specific slime dewatering qualities and change the floc structure normally irreversibly in to a more minimized structure. The suspended molecule will in general agglomerate and structure enormous floc inside which the bound water content is diminished.
Horth et al., (1994) surveyed that flow mindfulness on the removal practices of water works slime in different nations and elective approaches to arranging muck, especially to answer the obliges ashore filling. It was likewise suggested that the most encouraging courses of removal or utilization of water works slop incorporate, removal into sewage works, recuperation of coagulants, reuse in sewage treatment and application to land.
Lee, D.J., (1994) concentrated on that the power discharged on the floc and the versatility of the floc were assessed from the shaft avoidance and the state of deformity individually. During the interaction the group extended by 31-41%
over the length of the first floc. During defrosting, the flocs shape was incompletely reestablished and consequently the flocs inside is gooey versatile as exhibited by its pressure strain connection.
Myers, R.H et al., (1995) made sense of the cycles of item improvement utilizing the planned tests.
Chen, C.H., (1996) made sense of the different techniques for reuse and removal of WTP ooze.
Khuri, An et al., (1996) proposed that the plan and investigation of any issue can be helped out through reaction surface philosophy model.
Chu, W., (1999) broke down the alum ooze, and detailed that alum muck from water treatment plant contains a huge part of insoluble Aluminum hydroxides.
Chime Ajy, et al., (2000) made sense of that coagulants, for example, Alum and Ferric chloride diminishes ghastly electrostatic communications, for example, appealing power become more grounded over more prominent distance
of division between bacterial cells. The AFM based coagulation system makes it conceivable to enhance coagulation conditions by giving quantitative information as power versus distance bends. Control concentrates on in tests at Pbs cushion and PBS support + NaCl exhibit that the electrostatic collaborations assume a prevailing part in bacterial grip.
Sivaraos, et al., (2014) contrasted the RSM demonstrating and Taguchi Method of advancement and reasoned that despite the fact that both the procedures anticipated close to upsides of normal blunder, the RSM strategy is by all accounts really encouraging in foreseeing the reaction by means of numerical displaying over the Taguchi.
Yang, L., et al.,(2014) make sense of the reuse of corrosive coagulants recuperated drinking water works ooze remaining to eliminate phosperous from squander water by embracing suitable innovation.
El-Didamony, H., et al., (2014) have made sense of the physico-synthetic and surface qualities of some granulated slag-terminated drinking water ooze as a creation of concrete glue. The strength of the limiting materials have additionally been contemplated.
Fan, J., et al., (2014) have made sense of the effects of calcium water treatment buildup on the dirt, water and gasp framework in citrus creation. It is seen that there are impressive impacts because of the WTP slime in the plant frameworks.
Tantaway, M.A., (2015) concentrated on the portrayal and pozzolanic properties of calcined alum slop.
Ahamad,T., et al., (2016) concentrated on the portrayal of water treatment plant ooze and its protected removal choices, for example, block making, ceramics making in the production of concrete and cementacious materials s a substitute to building material. Further they have concentrated on the conceivable substitute choices of reuse of WTP slop in expulsion of weighty metals from fluid arrangements and in supplement decrease from loaded soils and spillovers. CPHEEO manual has
examined the different techniques for water treatment processes.
2.6 Summary
Broad audit of writing on earlier work has been introduced in this section. From the above examinations found water treatment plant ooze can be used in a powerful way by not arranging them into any water bodies or unloading into the dirt mass. Further it is gathered that the concentrate on the quantum of evacuation of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Suspended Solids (SS) by shifting the pH condition, speed of flocculate paddle is Extensive survey of writing on earlier work has been introduced in this part. From the above examinations found water treatment plant ooze can be used in a 14 successful way by not arranging them into any water bodies or unloading into the dirt mass.
Further it is derived that the concentrate on the quantum of evacuation restricted.
Advancing the WTP ooze utilization, upgraded pH and oar speed for most extreme expulsion of the poisons from squander water in order to limit the expense of treatment of waste water. By thinking about the above issue, the current work targets concentrating on the evacuation of BOD, COD, and TSS in the supernatant of the waste water by changing the pH and working velocity of the flocculate paddle, by presenting the WTP slop in a right extent.
3 CONCLUSIONS
The container tests were directed on the civil waste water utilizing WTP ooze and their outcomes were examined. At last, the accompanying ends were made.
i. For the relating slop measurements of 20mg/L with the Ph worth of 6.8 and working oar speed of 250 rpm, the greatest BOD,COD and TSS evacuation were found as 7.4%, 8.4%
and 9.7% separately in the supernatant arrangement of the waste water.
ii. While differing the worth of pH as 7.5, with slop measurement of 20mg/L and working oar speed of 250rpm, the BOD evacuation were viewed as 11.1%, 11.6 % and 9.8%
separately.
iii. The rate evacuation of BOD was 20%, COD was 21% and TSS was 19.5% in the supernatant arrangement of the waste water at the ooze measurement of 20mg/L, working oar speed of 250 rpm and pH of 7.9.
iv. The rate expulsion of BOD was 22%, COD was 23% and TSS was 22% in the supernatant arrangement of the waste water at the slop measurement of 20mg/L, working oar speed of 250 rpm and pH of 7.95.
v. With the pH worth of 8, working oar speed of 250 rpm and muck of 20 mg/L, 22% of BOD, 23%, COD and 22% of TSS expulsion was acquired.
REFERENCES
1. Warriner, T.R, O’Blenis, J.D, The Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Water Treatment Plant Wash Water From Sever Plants in Estern Ontario. Civil Engineering Research, 1972, Report No. CE 72-4, Royal Military College of Canada.
2. Hsu D.Y, Pipes W.O, Aluminium Hydroxide Effects on Waste Water Treatment Processes, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 1973, Vol.45, pp. 681-697.
3. Salatto, B.V, Farrell, J.B, Dean, R.B, The Effect of Water Utility Sludge on the Activated Sludge Processes, Journal - American Water Works Association, 1973, Vol. 65, pp. 428- 431.
4. CPHEEO, Government of India, Manual on Waste Water Treatment & Processes.
5. Montgomery, J.M. Water Treatment Principles and Design, Wiley, Newyork, 1985.
6. Culp, R.L., Wilson, W.I., Is Alum Sludge Advantage in Waste Water Treatment? Water Waste Engineering, 1979, Vol. 16, pp. 16-19.
7. Diamandpoulos. E, Benedek. A, Aluminium Hydrolysis Effects on Phosphorous Removal From Waste Waters, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 1998, Vol. 56, pp. 1165-1172.
8. Montgomery. J.M. Water Treatment Principles and Design Wiley. New York, 1985.
9. Peavy, H.S, Rowe, D.R., Tchobanoglous, G., Environmental Engineering. MG-Graw Hill Book Company, Singapore, 1985, pp. 207- 208.
10. Wantanabe. Y, Toyoshima. A, Fukuda. Y, Nakaishi. K, Improvement of Physical Properties of Biological Sludge and Chemical Adsorption of Orthophosphate by Chemical Sludge, Proceeding of Environmental Sani.
Engineering Research, 1987, Vol. 23, pp.
149-156.
11. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 19th Edition American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation, Washington D.C., 1995.
12. Elliot, Herschel. A, Brain. A, Dempsey, Agronic Effect of Land Application of Water
Treatment Sludges, Radio Nuclides Annual Conference, 1991, Vol. 83(4), pp. 121-131.
13. Mastuda. A, Kawasaki. K, Mizukawa. Y, Measurement of Bound Water in Excess Activated Sludges and Effect of Freezing and Thawing Process on It. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1992, Japan, Vol. 25, pp. 100- 103.
14. Horth. H, Gendebien. A, Agg. R, Cartwright.
N, Treatment and Disposal of Water Works Sludge in Selected European Countries. FWR Report, 1994, No. FR 0428.
15. Lee. D.J, Hsu. Y.H, Fast Freeze Thaw Treatment on Excess Activated Sludges Floc Structure and Sludge Dewater Ability, Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, Vol.28, pp.1444-1449.
16. Myer R.H, Montgomery. R.C, Response Surface Methodology Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments.
John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.
17. Chen. G.H, Introduction of HK University of Science and Technology, Journal of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering Research, (Kyoto University) 1996, Vol.10, pp.43-46.
18. Khuri Ali Cornell. J.A, Response Surfaces, Designs and Analysis. Marcel Dekkar, Neyork, 1996.
19. Chu. W, Lead Metal Removal by Recycled Alum Sludge, Journal of Water Research, 1999, Vol.33, (13), pp.3019-3025.
20. Bell-Ajy. K, Abbaszadegan. M, Ibrahim. E, Verges. D, Le Chevallier M, Conventional and Optimized Coagulation for NOM Removal, Journal of American Water Works Association, 2000, Vol.92, pp.44-47.
21. Dyton. E.A, Basta. N.T, Characterization of Drinking Water Environment Treatment Residuals for Use as a Soil Substitute, Journal of Water Environment Research, 2001, Vol. 73(1), pp. 52-56.
22. Huang. C, Pan. J.R, Sun. K.D, Liaw. C.T, Reuse of Water Treatment Plant Sludge and Dam Sediment in Brick Making, Journal of Water Science and Technology, ISSN 2000, 0273-1223.
23. Khoo. L.P, Chenn. C.H, Integration of Response Surface Methodology with Genetic Algorithm, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2001, Vol.18, pp.483-489
24. Lai. C.K, Salinity Effect on Biological Sludge Dewatering. Department of Chemical Engineering, Hongkong University of Science and Technology, 2001.
25. Chu. W, Dye Removal from Textile Dye Waste Water using Recycled Alum Sludge, Water Research, 2001, Vol.35 (13), pp.3147-3152.
26. Timothy. G, Yong-Chul Jang, Pradeep Jain, Thabot Tolaymat. Characterization of Drinking Water Sludge for Beneficial Reuse and Disposal Department of Environmental Engineering Science, University of Florida, 2001.
27. Montgometry. D.C, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley and Sons, Newyork, 2001.
28. Guan. X.H, Shang. C, Yu. S.M, Chen. G.H, Exploratory Study on Reusing Water
Treatment Works Sludge to Enhance Primary Sewage Treatment. Proceedings of the International Specialized Conference on Creative Water and Waste Water Treatment.
Technologies for Densely Populated Urban Areas, 2002, pp.189-195.
29. Zhao. Y.Q, Enhancement of Alum Sludge Dewatering Capacity by Using Gypsum as Skeleton Builder. Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physico Chemical and Engineering Aspects, 2002, Vol. 211, Issues 2-3, pp. 2005-2012.
30. Anderson. M, Biggs. A, Winters. C, Use of Two Blended Water Industry by Product Wastes as a Composite Substitute for Traditional Raw Materials Used in Clay Brick Manufacture, In Proceeding of the International Symposium on Recycling and Reuse of Waste Material, 9- 11, Dundee, Scottland, U.K, 2003, pp. 417- 426.
31. Patric Niquette, Frederic Monette, Abdelkrim Azzouz, Robert Hauster. Impacts of Substituting Aluminium - Based Coagulants in Drinking Water Treatments, Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 2004, Vol.
39(3), pp. 3003-3010.
32. Grun. J, Slab. J. M, The Use of Factorial Design and Response Surface Methodology for Fart Determination of Optimal Heat Treatment Conditions of Different Ni-Co-Mo Surface Layer, Journal of Material Process Technology, 2004, Vol.155, pp. 2026-2032 33. Ortiz. F, Simpson. J.R, Pignatiello. J.J,
Heredia- Langer.A, A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple Response Optimization, Journal of Quantity Technology, 2004, Vol.
36, pp.432-450.
34. Huh. C.J, Lee. J.H, Bae. K.S, Byun. Y.H, Lee.
J.W, and Lee. E.J, Performance Optimization of Hypervelocity Launcher System Using Experimental Data, International Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2004, Vol. 18, pp.1829-1836.
35. Oklem. H, Erzurmlu. T, Kurfaran. H, Application of Response Surface Methodology in the Optimization of Cutting Condition for Surface Roughness, Journal of Material Science and Engineering, 2005, Vol. 170, pp.11-16
36. Kansal. H.K, Singh. S, Kumar. P, Prametric Optimization of Powder Mixed Electrical Discharge Machining by Response Surface Methodology, Journal of Material Science and Engineering, 2005, Vol. 169, pp.427-436 37. Ozcelik. B, Erzurmlu. T, Determination of
Effecting Dimensional Parameter on Warpage of Thin Shell Plastic Parts Using Integrated Response Surface Method and Genetic Algorithm. International Conference on Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, Vol. 32, pp.1085-1094 38. Puri. A.B, Battachearya. B, Modeling and
Analysis of White Layer Depth in a Wire Cut EDM Process through Response Surface Methodology, International Journal for Advance Manufacturing Technology, 2005, Vol. 25, pp.301-307
39. Chen. M.J, Chen. K.N, Lin. C.W, Optimal Manufacturing Conditions Response Surface Models for the Optimal Manufacturing Conditions of Diary Food, Journal of Food Engineering, 2005, Vol. 68, pp.471-480
40. Kim. D, Rhee. S, Choi. K.K, Efficient Response Modeling by Using Moving Least- Squared Method and Sensitivity, AIAA Journal, 2005, Vol. 43(11), pp. 2404-2411 41. Carvalho. M, Antas., A Drinking Water Sludge
as a Resource, In Proceeding of IWA Specialized Conference on Management of Residues Emanating From Water and Waste Water Treatment, Johannesburg, South Africa. August – 2005, pp. 9-12.
42. Park.Y, Montagomery. D.C, Fowler. J. W, and Borror, C.M, Cost Construction g-Efficient Response Surface Design for Cuboidal Regions, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2006, Vol. 22, pp.121-139 43. Correia. D.S, Goncaves. C.V, Cunha. S.S,
Ferraresi, V.A, Comparison between Genetic Algorithm and Response Surface Methodology in GMAN Welding Optimization, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 2005, Vol.
160, pp.70-76.
44. Jaganath Munda, Bijoy Battacharia, Investigation into Electro Chemical Micro Machining (EMM) through Response Surface Methodology Based Approach, International Journal for Advance Manufacturing Technology, 2006, Vol. 35: pp. 821-832.
45. Guidelines of Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2007.
46. Babatunde. A, Zhao. Y, Constructive Approaches toward Water Treatment Work Sludge Management - An International Review Beneficial Reuses. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, Vol. 37(2), pp. 129-164.
47. Paulo.J, Gaitonde. S.N, Karnik. S.R. An Investigative Study of Determination in Drilling of Medium Density Fiber Board (MDF) Using Response Surface Models, International Journal for Advance Manufacturing Technology, 2008, Vol. 37, pp. 49-57.
48. Alvarez. M.J, Ilzarbe. L, Viles. E, Tanco. M, The use of Genetic Algorithms’ in Response Surface Methodology, Journal for Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 2007, Vol.6(3), pp. 295-307.
49. Walsh. M.E, Lake. C.B, Gegnon. G.A, Strategic Path Ways for the Sustainable Management of Water Treatment Plant Residuals, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2008, Vol. 7(1), pp.
45-52.
50. Wilson, Heidi Elizabeth, Innovative Reuse Option for WTP Sludge, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering, Deakin University, Victoria, 2008
51. Ramadan. M.O, Hanan. A.F, Hassanain.
A.M., Reuse of Water Treatment Plant Sludge in Brick Manufacturing, Journal of Applied Science Research, 2008, Vol. 4(10), pp. 1223- 1224.
52. Husillos Rodriguez. N, Martinez Ramirez. S, Blanco & Varela. M.T, Guillem. M. Puig. J, Larrotcha. E, and Flores. J, Re-use of Drinking Water Treatment Plant Sludge.
Characterization and Technological Behavior to Cement Mortar with Customized Additions.
Journal of Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, Vol. 40, Issue 5, pp. 778-786.
53. Uwimana. A, Nhapi. I, Wali. U.G, Hoko. Z, Koshaigili. K, Sludge Characterization at Koda hokwa Water Treatment Plant, Water Science and Technology, 2010, Vol. 10(5), pp.
848-859.
54. Asada, Lucia. N, Sundefeld, Gilberto. C, Alvarez, Carlos. R, Filho, Sidney Seeker Ferrira, Piveli Roque. P, Water Treatment Plant Sludge Discharge to Waste Water Treatment Works: Effect on the Operation of Up Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor and Activated Sludge Systems, Journal of Water Environment Research, 2010, Vol. 82, pp. 392-400(9).
55. Nicolas G. Pizzi, Water Treatment Plant Residuals Field guide, American Water Works Association Publications, 2010, ISBN - 10158327797.
56. Verlicchi. P, Masotti. L, Reuse of Drinking Water Treatment Plant Sludge in Agriculture.
2010, University of Ferrara, Italy.
57. Prabuthas, P., Srivastav, P. P., Mishra, H. N., Optimization of Environmental Factors using RSM for Spirulinaplatensis Cultivation, Journal of Nutrition and Food Science, 2011, Vol. 41, Issue-3,
58. Nair, A. T., Ahammed, M. M., The Reuse of Water Treatment Sludge as Acoagulant for Post-Treatment of UASB Reactor Treating Urban Waste Water. Journal of cleaner Production, 2013, Vol 96, pp. 272-281.
59. Athisankar. P, Rajendra Manchavaran. K, System Identification of a Composite Plate Using Hybrid Response Surface Methodology and Particle Swarm Optimization in Time Domaen, Science Direct, Measurement, 2014, Vol. 55, pp. 499-511
60. Sivaraos., Milky, K. R., Samsudin, A. R., Dubey, A. K., Kidd, P., Comparison between Taguchi Method and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Modeling CO2 Laser Machining, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2014, Vol. 8(1), pp 35-42..
61. Yang, L., Weir, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, D., Reuse of Acid Coagulants Recovered Drinking Water Works Sludge Residual to Remove Phosperous by Adopting Appropriate Technology in Waste Water. Applied Surface Science, 2014, Vol. 305, 337-346.
62. El. Didamony, H., Khalil, K. A., Heikal, M., Physico-Chemical and Surface Characteristics of some Granulated Slag- Fired Drinking Water Sludge Composite Cement Pastes, Journal of HBRC, 2014, Vol.
10, pp.73-81.
63. Fan, J., He, Z., Ma, L. Q., Yang, Y., Stoffella, P. J., Impacts of Calcium Water Treatment Residue on the Soil, Water- Plant Stem in Citrus Production. Plant Soil, 2014, Vol.374, PP 993-1004.
64. Tantaway, M. A., Characterization and Pozzolanic Properties of Calcined Alum Sludge. Materials Research Bulletin, 2015, Vol.61, pp. 415-421.
65. Ahamad, T., Ahmad, K., Alam, M., Characterization of Water Treatment Plant Sludge and its Safe Disposal Options.
Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2016, Vol.
35, pp. 950-955.
66. Gandhi Gram Rural Institute, Gandigram, India. Procedure for Water Analysis, Manual on Professional Sector Training for Water Quality Personals, 1998.
67. Qusism. S.R, Motely. E.M, Zhu. G, Water Works Engineering, Planning, Design, and Operation, Chiang, Patel and Year by Inc, 2000, Prentice - Hall PTR.
68. Wing. C, Lin. D, Chiang. P, Utilization of Sludge as Brick Material, Advances in Environmental Research, 2003, Vol.7 (3), pp.679-685.
69. Goldbold. P, Lewin. K, Graham. A, Barke. P, The Potential Reuse of Water Utility Products as Secondary Commercial Materials, 2003, WRC Report No. UC 6081.
70. Xiao-Hong Guan, Guang-Hao Chen, Chill Shang, Reuse of Water Treatment Works Sludge to Enhance Particulate Pollutant Removal from Sewage, Water Research, 2005, Vol.39, pp. 3433-3440.
71. Mary Jean Yon. Guidance for Land Application of Drinking Water Treatment Plant Sludge. Department of Environmental Protection, Florida, 2006.
72. Paulo Dav., A, Gaitonde. V.N, Karnik. S.R, An Investigative Study of Delamination in Drilling of Medium Density Fiber Board Using Response Surface Models, International Journal for Advance Manufacturing Technology, 2008, Vol.37, pp. 49:57.
73. Mirosla. K, Opportunities for Water Treatment Sludge and its Reuse, Geo Science Engineering, 2008, Vol. LIV (1), pp.11-22.
ISSN 1802-5420.
74. Wikipedia encyclopedia. 2010, on Sewage Treatment.
75. Mark Harpev. Water Treatment Plant Sludge Reuse. China Water Risk, April 19, 2013.
76. Mabe Algam, Ahmad Jomrah, Haya Dagh Las, Utilization of Cement Incorporated with Water Treated Sludge, Jordon Journal of Civil Engineering 2011, Vol. 5(2).
77. Elangovan. C, Subramanian. K, Reuse of Alum Sludge in Clay Brick Manufacturing, International Water Association, 2011, pp.
171-180.
78. CPHEEO, Government of India, Manual on Water Supply and Treatment.
79. Giuseppina La Rosa, Lucia Bonadonna, Luca Lucentini, Sebastien Kenmoe, Elisabetta Suffredini, “Coronavirus in water environments: Occurrence, persistence and concentration methods - A scoping review”, Water Research 179 (2020) 115899.
80. Sumihar Hutapea, Marischa Elveny, Mohammed A. Amin, M.S. Attia, Afrasyab Khane, Shaheen M. Sarkar, “Adsorption of thallium from wastewater using disparate nano-based materials: A systematic review”,
Arabian Journal of Chemistry (2021) 14, 103382.
81. Mohamed A. Hassaan, Ahmed El Nemr,
“Pesticides pollution: Classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques”, Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 46 (2020) 207–220.
82. Sebastian Wolff, Jutta Kerpen, Jürgen Prediger, Luisa Barkmann, Lisa Müller,
“Determination of the microplastics emission in the effluent of a municipal waste water treatment plant using Raman micro spectroscopy”, Water Research X 2 (2019) 100014.
83. Roop Kishor, Diane Purchase, Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale, Rijuta Ganesh Saratale, Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira, Muhammad Bilal, Ram Chandra, Ram Naresh Bharagava, “Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety”, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9 (2021) 105012.
84. Erin M. SymondsI, Karyna RosarioI, Mya BreitbartI, “Pepper mild mottle virus:
Agricultural menace turned effective tool for microbial water quality monitoring and assessing (waste) water treatment technologies”, PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.10076 39 April 18, 2019.
85. Asim Ali Yaqoob, Mohamad Nasir Mohamad Ibrahim, “A Review Article of Nanoparticles;
Synthetic Approaches and Wastewater Treatment Methods”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 06 Issue: 03 | Mar 2019.
86. Ahmed Mussa and K. V. Suryabhagavan,
“Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria spatial modeling: a case study in Logia town, Afar region, Ethiopia”, Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 2021, VOL. 5, NO. 3, 186–198, https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.17 03311.
87. Thomas Lange, Petra Schneider, Stefan Schymura and Karsten Franke, “The Fate of Anthropogenic Nanoparticles, nTiO2 and nCeO2, in Waste Water Treatment”, Water 2020, 12, 2509; doi:10.3390/w12092509.
88. Isam I. Omran, Nabeel H. Al-Saati, Hyam H.
Al-Saati, Khalid S. Hashim and Zainab N. Al- Saati, “Sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment techniques in urban areas of Iraq using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)”, Water Practice &
Technology Vol 16 No 2, 2021, doi:
10.2166/wpt.2021.013.
