• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Concurrent mosquito-borne triple infections of dengue, malaria and chikungunya: A case report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Concurrent mosquito-borne triple infections of dengue, malaria and chikungunya: A case report "

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Case Reports

Concurrent mosquito-borne triple infections of dengue, malaria and chikungunya: A case report

Neeru Gupta, Chhaya Gupta & Anju Gomber

Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, India Key words Chikungunya; concurrent; dengue; malaria

J Vector Borne Dis 54, June 2017, pp. 191–193

Dengue, malaria and chikungunya are important mosquito-borne diseases and endemic in India. Each of these diseases contribute substantially to the morbidity, if not diagnosed and managed at an earliest. The clinical features common to all the three diseases are prolonged fever, backache, joint pain, rash, headache, running nose and epistaxis causing challenge in diagnostic segregation based on the symptoms alone. Coinfections with dengue and chikungunya have been reported in literature; how- ever, triple infections are very rare. In India, the first case of concurrent infections with dengue, chikungunya and malaria was published by Hati et al1 in 2016. We report here, a second case of concurrent infections with dengue, malaria and chikungunya in a 55-yr-old male patient from India.

Case Report

A 55-yr-old male patient from Haryana state was admitted in the Balaji Action Hospital, New Delhi with complaints of fever, body pain, headache, vomiting, oral ulcers, breathlessness, anxiety and chest pain for past five days. On general physical examination, patient was conscious, self-oriented but lethargic with no hepa- tosplenomegaly. The laboratory investigations done on the day of admission revealed haemoglobin–15.9 mg/dl;

total leucocyte count of 23.3×109/l; platelet count–

83×109/l; C-reactive protein–3.9 mg/dl; serum aspartate transaminase–195 IU/L; serum alanine transaminase 176 IU/L; serum calcium–6.5 mg/dl; blood urea–239 mg/

dl; serum creatinine–1.7 mg/dl; glycosylated haemoglo- bin–8.7%; and serum procalcitonin–4.5 ng/ml. Dengue serology for IgM done by dengue IgM capture ELISA kit by Panbio was positive and NS1 antigen test performed by Panbio Dengue early ELISA kit was negative. PCR for chikungunya using chikungunya RNA qualitative real time PCR assay was positive. The result of rapid ma-

laria test using SureTest Malaria Pf/Pv HRP2/pLDH kit by Microgene was positive for Plasmodium falciparum and negative for P. vivax. Widal test performed by tube method, using SPAN diagnostics reagents was negative and blood culture performed on BACTEC was sterile.

Chest X-Ray showed increased lung markings with ill-defined shadowing. Ultrasonography revealed mild hepatosplenomegaly. Magnetic resonance imag- ing of brain showed non-specific white matter is chae- mic changes. The 2D Echocardiography showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (54%) along with mild mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation and mild pulmonary artery hypertension. The patient was treated with intravenous artesunate, ceftriaxone, pantocid, paci- mol, emset, mucaine gel application for oral ulcers and plenty of intravenous dextrose, ringer lactate and dextrose normal saline (DNS) during hospital stay and was dis- charged in satisfactory stable condition with proper treat- ment advice. At the time of discharge patient’s laboratory parameters were: packed cell volume (PCV)–37%; plate- let count–189×109/l; total leucocyte count–12.6×109/l;

blood urea–31 mg/dl; serum creatinine–0.7 mg/dl and serum sodium–127 mmol/l.

DISCUSSION

Though, previous records of dual infections with den- gue and chikungunya, and dengue and malaria exist, re- ports of concurrent infections with dengue, chikungunya and malaria are rare. Studies on dual infections with den- gue and chikungunya were reported by Myers and Carry2 in 1967, Leroy et al3 in 2009, and Chang et al4 in 2010.

The first case of coinfection with dengue and malaria by P. falciparum was published by Charrel et al5 in 2005 and Hati et al1 in 2012. Bhalla et al6 reported first case of concurrent infection of dengue and malaria in India in

(2)

J Vector Borne Dis 54, June 2017 192

2005. Chahar et al7 reported cases of chikungunya and dengue virus co-infections in Delhi, India in 2006. As per the records of the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, India; in 2014, Delhi witnessed 847 dengue cases with three deaths, 98 malaria cases, and eight chi- kungunya cases with no deaths8.

Fever, joint pain, headache, vomiting and fatigue are common denominator symptoms of dengue, chikungu- nya and malaria with different clinical outcomes. Concur- rent infections with these infective agents cause overlap- ping of clinical features leading to diagnostic challenge by the physicians, especially in endemic areas; however, certain parameters are helpful to some extent in differ- entiating dengue, chikungunya and malaria. Anaemia is a classical symptom of malaria but it is barely described in dengue fever9. The triad of haematological findings:

atypical lymphocytosis, haemoconcentration and throm- bocytopenia might give clue for differentiating dengue infection from that of malaria10. Headache, myalgia, mild arthralgia, ocular pain, liquid leak tissue, haemor- rhage and thrombocytopenia are common in dengue cases where as severe polyarthralgia, arthritis, conjunctivitis, oedema and exanthema are seen more in chikungunya11. The laboratory investigations are important to arrive at a definitive diagnosis.

In the present case, the patient was febrile for five days and dengue serology for IgM, NS1 antigen detection, PCR for chikungunya and rapid test for malaria were per- formed on the day of admission itself along with other rou- tine investigations. The results of dengue IgM positivity and negative NS1 antigen could be because of previously ignored fever by the patient which had given such results on testing. Dengue serology for both IgM and IgG anti- bodies along with NS1 antigen detection are important as dengue IgM antibodies can be detected in the dengue patients as early as 3 to 5 days after the fever onset and persist for 30–90 days, even detectable for eight months post infection. Similarly, dengue IgG antibodies eleva- tion detection is important to establish secondary infec- tion as they can be detected in serum as early as three days post onset of illness, however peak detection window for accurate diagnosis is 6–15 days following illness onset.

Detection of dengue NS1 antigen can be done in serum from Day 1 after onset of fever and up to nine days. It is important to perform dengue serology for both IgM and IgG antibodies as secondary infection by dengue virus may go undetected if IgG antibody detection is not done.

Since dengue serology for IgG antibody detection was not requested by the clinician, it was not performed;hence

it could not be detected whether patient had primary or secondary dengue infection, which was important. There- fore, consideration for the possibility of concurrent infec- tions, in cases of atypical clinical manifestations or acute febrile illness, is essential especially for early diagnosis as the management protocols for dengue, chikungunya and malaria are different.

Arboviral infections are important public health concerns worldwide. For the countries,where there is lo- cal transmission of dengue as well as chikungunya and malaria12, it is imperative to effectuate range of techni- cal factors that promote prevention and restrict activity of the causative agents, as they share nearly same clinical manifestations during the first week of infection and poses diagnostic challenge to the treating clinicians. Thus, there is a great need to increase the awareness about the mixed infections among physicians for diagnosis and manage- ment and also to report such incidences. Strong clinical judgement on the part of clinician to select battery of tests and understanding diagnostic implication of each disease is essential. Failure or delay to recognize the concurrent infections can delay the initiation of proper therapy result- ing in increased morbidity and mortality.

Conflict of interest: None to declare.

Ethical issues/statement: None.

REFERENCES

1. Hati AK, Chandra G, Mukherjee H, Mondal R, Talukar, Bhat- tacharyya N. Concurrent infections of three mosquito borne diseases–Dengue, chikungunya and malaria. J Mosq Res 2016;

6: 1–3.

2. Myers RM, Carey DF. Concurrent isolation from patients of two arboviruses, chikungunya and dengue type 2. Science 1967;

157:1307–8.

3. Leroy EM, Nkogue D, Ollomo B, Nze-Nkogue C, Becquart P, Grard G, et al. Concurrent chikungunya and dengue virus in- fections during simultaneous outbreaks, Gabon, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15(4): 691–3.

4. Chang SF, Su CL, Yang CF, Liao TL, Cheng CH, Hu HC, et al. Concurrent isolation of chikungunya virus and dengue virus from a patient with coinfection resulting from a trip to Singa- pore. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48(12): 4586–9.

5. Charrel RN, Brouqui P, Foucault C, Lamballerie X de.

Concurrent dengue and malaria. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11 (7):

1153–4.

6. Bhalla A, Sharma N, Sharma A, Suri V. Concurrent infection with dengue and malaria. Indian J Med Sci 2006; 60: 30–1.

7. Chahar HS, Bharaj P, Dar L, Guleria R, Kabra SK, Broor S. Co- infections with chikungunya virus and dengue virus in Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15(7): 1077–80.

(3)

193 Gupta et al: Concurrent dengue, malaria and chikungunya

8. Dengue/Chikungunya/Malaria 2014–15. Delhi: National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme 2015.

9. Selvaretnam AA, Sahu PS, Sahu M, Ambu S. A review of con- current infections of malaria and dengue in Asia. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2016; 6: 633–8.

10. Navarrete-Espinosa J, Gonzalez-Ibarra J, Cruz-Tinoco CES, Gonzalez-Bonilla CR, Pacheco-Hernández M, Muñoz-Medina J. Clinical behaviour of dengue and chikungunya infections in Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Open J Med Microbiol

2016; 6: 23–31.

11. Epelboin L, Hanf M, Dussart P, Epelboin SO, Djossou F, Nascher M. Is dengue and malaria co-infection more severe than single infections? A retrospective matched pair study in French Guiana. Malar J 2012;142:1–13.

12. Gyawali N, Bradbury RS, Taylor-Robinson AW. The epidemiol- ogy of dengue infection: Harnessing past experience and current knowledge to support implementation of future control strategies.

J Vector Borne Dis 2016; 53(4): 293–304.

Correspondence to: Dr Neeru Gupta, BN-41, East Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi–110 088, India.

E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 6 December 2016 Accepted in revised form: 19 April 2017

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Conclusion: The epidemiologic study of Dengue Virus Infection in Surabaya and Sidoarjo; in the year 2009 found changing predominant Dengue Virus Serotype from Dengue Virus II