• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

E- CONTENT COURSE: LLB-Vth Sem SUBJECT: EQUITY AND TRUST SUBJECT CODE: LL.B. 502 NAME OF FACULTY: DR. ANKUR SRIVASTAVA FACULTY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "E- CONTENT COURSE: LLB-Vth Sem SUBJECT: EQUITY AND TRUST SUBJECT CODE: LL.B. 502 NAME OF FACULTY: DR. ANKUR SRIVASTAVA FACULTY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

FACULTY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES E- CONTENT

COURSE: LLB-Vth Sem

SUBJECT: EQUITY AND TRUST

SUBJECT CODE: LL.B. 502

NAME OF FACULTY: DR. ANKUR SRIVASTAVA

(2)

BRAND GUIDELINE

--- Topic

Font Name- Candara Bold Font Size- 20

Font Color- White

--- Heading

Font Name- Arial (Bold) Font Size- 16

Lecture-22

(3)

LECTURE-22

Maxim:

He who comes to equity must come with clean hands:

This maxim means that a plaintiff who seeks an equitable remedy or other equitable relief must show that his past conduct in the transaction has been fair, honest and above board. It may be distinguished from the previous maxim in that it refers to behaviour prior to the suit, as opposed to future conduct.

Illustrations

i. A tenant whose lease has been forfeited for non- payment of rent cannot expect equitable relief against

(4)

forfeiture if he has been using the premises for immoral purposes. See Gill v. Lewis (1956) 2 QB 1 at pp. 13, 14, 17.

ii. An equitable tenant under an agreement for a lease cannot expect to obtain a decree of specific performance of the legal lease if he has been in breach of the covenants to be contained in that lease. See Coastworth v. Johnson (1886) 54 LT 520.

iii. Where an infant beneficiary, by fraudulently representing himself to be of age, obtained from the trustees a sum of money to which he was not entitled until he came of age, neither he nor his assigns could compel the trustees to pay the sum over again when he attained his majority. See Overton v. Bannister (1844) 3 Hare 503.

It is important to note that the maxim does not refer to any conduct of the plaintiff other than that which is connected with the transaction in question. As one American Judge put it: “Equity does not demand that its suitors shall

(5)

have led blameless lives.” See Brandeis J. in Loughran v.

Loughran, 292 US 216 at 229 (1934). It is only conduct which has “an immediate and necessary relation to the equity sued for” that will bar the plaintiff’s claim. See Dering v.

Winchelsea (1787) 1 Cox Eq. 318 at 319, 320.

MCQs

1. He who comes to equity must come with clean hands:This maxim means that a plaintiff who seeks an equitable remedy or other equitable relief must show that his past conduct in the transaction has been fair, honest and above board.

i. True ii. False

iii. Cannot say iv. None of these

2. An equitable tenant under an agreement for a lease cannot expect to obtain a decree of specific

(6)

performance of the legal lease if he has been in breach of the covenants to be contained in that lease.

i. True ii. False

iii. Cannot say iv. None of these

3. It is important to note that the maxim does not refer to any conduct of the plaintiff other than that which is connected with the transaction in question.

i. True ii. False

iii. Cannot say iv. None of these

4. An equitable tenant under an agreement for a lease cannot expect to obtain a decree of specific performance of the legal lease if he has been in breach of the covenants to be contained in that lease.

i. True

(7)

ii. False

iii. Cannot say iv. None of these

5. “Equity does not demand that its suitors shall have led blameless lives.”

i. True ii. False

iii. Cannot say iv. None of these

********

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Examples of gifts by way of portions include, marriage portion; money laid out either for the training of the child into a profession or setting him up in business; paying for his

• Right to reimburse expenses incurred for trust purposes The trustee has the right to be reimbursed for the expenses incurred by him for the purpose of the trust, like expenses

LECTURE-11 In the last module, we considered the history of equity, how the doctrines of equity were introduced into India, the relation between Equity and Common Law and the nature of

Maitland suggested that the definition of a trust as: ‘’When a person has rights which he is bound to exercise upon behalf of another or for the accomplishment of some particular

The trust property • Again, unless the trust is declared by will, or the author of the trust is himself to be trustee, the author has to transfer the trust property to the trustee •