• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Indian Philosophy - Nptel

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Indian Philosophy - Nptel"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

 

Indian Philosophy 

Author: Dr. Satya Sundar Sethy, HSS, IIT Madras, Chennai-600036

Lecture - 10

Self Assessment Questions & Possible Answers

1. Briefly explain the pramānas accepted by Sānkhya philosophy.

Ans.: Sānkhya philosophy accepts three pramānas; perception, inference, and verbal testimony or sabda. They believe that perception is of two types;

determinate and indeterminate. Determinate perception is one where the cogniser cognizes the object as it is, whereas indeterminate perception is one where the cogniser perceives the object but couldn’t able to identify the object. According to Sānkhya philosophy, inference is of two types; affirmative and negative.

Affirmative inference is constituted of universal affirmative propositions.

Negative inference is constituted of universal negative propositions. Verbal testimony on their viewpoint is again of two types; laukika and vaidika.

2. How many types of suffering find in Sānkhya philosophy?

Ans.: Ādhyātmika, it is due to mental and physical causes. Ādhibhautika, it is happened due to material and natural causes. Ādhidaivika, it is due to extraordinary causes such as ghosts, etc.

3. How does Sānkhya treat the concept ‘liberation’?

Ans.: According to them, there are two types of liberation; jivanmukti and videhamukti. In case of jivanmukti, one can put his/her best effort to detach from the worldly objects. Hence, he/she can live and won’t fall in the cycle of karmic influx. Videhamukti is possible only after the death of an individual. It is so because once the body dies, the soul is free from gross and subtle bodies.

TheSānkhyatheory of liberation is termed as ‘apavarga’ or the summum bonum of life.

 

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Ans.: ‘Citta’ is an amalgam of three internal organs; buddhi or intellect, ahamkāra or ego, and mānas or mind described in the Sānkhya philosophy.. Briefly write about

We ask whether any contradiction would follow if the given conclusion is accepted as true or rejected as false.. If we find any contradiction by accepting the conclusion as true, then

Ans.: Sānkhya named prakruti parināmavāda as vivartavāda, which explained that cause changed into effect is merely a superficial phenomenon.. For example, cloth is nothing but the

Thus, etymologically speaking arthapatti is that knowledge which resolves the conflict between two facts by providing the supposition to it.. Briefly explain about

Ans.: Vyāpti is an invariable, universal, unconditional, and concomitant relation between major term sādhya and middle term linga.. It is found in the inferential

The contradicting process is to contradict the predicate part of the Anvya and placed in the subject part of Vyatireka and contradicts the subject part of the Anvya and placed in the

Ans.: Vyāpti is an invariable, universal, unconditional, and concomitant relation between major term sādhya and middle term linga.. It is found in the inferential

So in every situation, it is me, mine, myself appear which indicate that an individual is associated with the worldly objects so passionately that he/she can’t bear the dissociation