INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad -500 043

(1)

Page | 1

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

Dundigal, Hyderabad -500 043

B.TECH PROJECT WORK EVALUATION / ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

The scope of this document is to elaborate the guidelines and rubrics for the evaluation and assessment of B.Tech Project Work based on Outcome Based Education (OBE) to successfully meet the Program Outcomes / Program Specific Outcomes (PO / PSO) in accordance with the specifications of National Board of Accreditation (NBA).

The project work shall be innovative in nature and explore the research bent of the mind of the student. A student shall carry out the project work under the supervision of a member of the faculty or may undertake to execute the project in collaboration with an Industry, R&D organization or another academic institution/University where sufficient facilities exist to carry out the project work.

Project report will be assessed for 100 marks in total. The Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) shall be for 30 marks and the Semester End Examination (SEE) shall be for remaining 70 marks based on publication, report, presentation, execution and viva-voce.

1. B.TECH PROJECT WORK OBJECTIVES:

This course will expose students:

I. To offer an opportunity to demonstrate their competence in laboratory work.

II. To integrate the knowledge gained in courses studied.

III. To allow the exercise maturity, initiative and creative ability.

IV. To apply communication skills, both oral and written, to communicate results, concepts and ideas.

V. To solve problems of a non-routine nature.

2. B.TECH PROJECT WORK LEARNING OUTCOMES

By the end of the course, students are able to show competence in the following areas:

CO 1: Ability to plan and implement an investigative or developmental project given general objectives and guidelines.

CO 2: In-depth skill to use some laboratory, modern tools and techniques.

CO 3: Ability to analyze data to produce useful information and to draw conclusions by systematic deduction.

CO 4: Facilitate significant individualized interactions between faculty members and students through a multi-term research experience.

CO 5: Ability to communicate results, concepts, analyses and ideas in written and oral form.

CO 6: Conduct an extended independent investigation that results in the production of a research thesis.

(2)

Page | 2

3. PROGRAM OUTCOMES

A graduate of the Engineering Program will demonstrate:

PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.

PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences

PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.

PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.

PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.

PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.

PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.

PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.

PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.

PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

(3)

Page | 3

4. PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

Graduates will have an ability to:

PSO1: Apply the principles of computational theory and other aligned disciplines to analyze solutions of the computing problem.

PSO2: Focus on design and development of software applications using integrated technology stack Social, Mobile, Analytical and Cloud (SMAC).

PSO3: Build practical experience in shipping real world software, using industry standard tools and collaboration techniques will equip to secure and succeed in first job upon graduation in IT industry.

5. CO – PO / PSO Mapping

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

CO1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3

CO2 2 3 3 3 3

CO3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3

CO4 3 3 3 2

CO5 3 3 3 3

CO6 3 2 3 3 3 3

2 3 3 2.75 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2.75

6. EVALUATION / ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES:

Students are evaluated based on their work progress. Therefore, students are expected to meet their respective supervisors regularly to present their progress. In addition, students are required to maintain their logbooks accordingly. Only students with satisfactory progress are allowed to submit their technical paper publication and project report. Students also are required to present their complete project work in the form of well-structured report.

The motive is to enhance students’ writing skill and it is popularly considered as the ultimate task in B.Tech program. Both work progress and project report will be monitored by the project supervisor. As a summarization, the assessment consists of four major sections as depicted in Table 1.

Table 1. The major sections of the assessment

Section Description Marks

FSI Non FSI

Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) 30 30

Semester End Examination (SEE)

• Technical Paper Evaluation (TPE) 30 10

• Project Presentation Evaluation (PPE) 20 30

• Final Report Evaluation (FRE) 20 30

(4)

Page | 4

7. CONTINUOUS INTERNAL ASSESSMENT (CIA)

The Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) shall be for 30 marks and done by a Department Review Committee (DRC) comprising the supervisor, project coordinator, Head of the department and two senior professors. This section evaluates the students’ progress during the work that regularly submitting to the supervisor and the assessment is made by DRC as mentioned earlier.

First review of CIA is done at the end of VII semester on the progress for 30 marks and students should submit project synopsis summarizing the work done in VII semester. The project is expected to be completed by the end of VIII semester. A second review is conducted on the progress for 30 marks during VIII semester. A third review is conducted for another 30 marks before the report is submitted on completion of the project. The final CIA marks will be the average of the three assessments.

Each assessment of the PRC should follow the evaluation guidelines and rubrics as mentioned in Table 2, and Table 3.

Table 2. CO – PO Specifications for CIA

S. No Specification CO PO Maximum

Marks 1 Attendance: Ability to frequently meet with

supervisor

CO4 PO8, PO9, PO12, PSO3 5

2 Creativity: Ability to gather information and resources for the given problem

CO1 PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO11, PO12, PSO1

5

3 Work progress: Ability to use and record any work progress in a logbook for a given timeline

CO2, CO5

PO4, PO5, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

10

4 Demonstration and finding of results: Ability to demonstrate and analyze results with appropriate reasonable explanation

CO3, CO6

PO1 to PO7, PO12, PSO1, PSO2

PO4, PO6, PO12, PSO1, PSO2, PSO3

10

Total 30 Table 3. Rubrics Evaluation form for CIA

S. No Specification Very Weak 1

Weak 2

Moderate 3

Strong 4

Very Strong 5 1 Attendance Meet less

than 3 times per semester

Meet more than 3 times per semester but less than 5 times

Meet more than 10 times per semester

2 Creativity Too Dependent and not creative

Dependent but show some creativity

Independent, show some creativity

Independent and creative

Highly independent, creative and can work with minimum supervision

3 Work progress No logbook and no progress

No logbook with poor progress

Logbook maintained with poor progress

Logbook maintained with good progress

Logbook maintained with advanced progress 4 Demonstration

and finding of results

No element met

Only results are

demonstrated

Results demonstrated and analyzed critically, but no explanation of results

Results demonstrated and analyzed critically with inaccurate explanation of results

Results

demonstrated and analyzed critically with accurate explanation of results

(5)

Page | 5

8. SEMESTER END EXAMINATION (SEE)

The Semester End Examination (SEE) shall be for remaining 70 marks based on publication, report, presentation, execution and viva-voce and done by a Project Review Committee (PRC) comprising the supervisor, project coordinator, Head of the department, Dean (UG & PG), Dean (R&D) and an examiner nominated by the Principal from the panel of experts recommended by Chairman, BOS. A minimum of 40% of maximum marks shall be obtained to earn the corresponding credits.

8.1 Technical Paper Evaluation (TPE)

The evaluation and assessment will be done at the end of the semester during SEE as per the evaluation guidelines and rubrics as mentioned in Table 4, and Table 5. The assessment is for 100 Marks and the marks obtained will then be relatively rounded for a maximum of 30 or 10 marks for FSI or Non-FSI respectively.

Table 4. CO – PO Specifications for TPE

S. No Specification CO PO Maximum

Marks 1 Abstract: Objective(s), Scope of Study,

Methodology & Findings

10

2 Introduction: Overview of Study, Problem Statement, Problem Identification, Significance of the Study, Objective and Scope of Study

3 Methodology: Algorithm, flow charts or pseudo codes of the programming codes OR/AND, hardware design, block diagram, appropriate circuitry and relevant techniques towards achieving the project outcomes

CO2, PO4, PO5, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

30

4 Results and Discussion: Exhibit the significant results of the project, Discus and analyze the results of the project

CO3 PO1 to PO7, PO12, PSO1, PSO2

20

5 Conclusion: Students should be able to conclude the findings in addressing the objective of the project & Recommendation for future work

CO6 PO4, PO6, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

10

6 Format: Written according to format CO5 PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

10

Total 100 Table 5. Rubrics Evaluation form for TPE

S.No Specification Very Weak 1

Weak 2

Moderate 3

Strong 4

Very Strong 5 1 Abstract Not clearly

stated

Only 1 element clearly stated

Only 2 elements clearly stated

All elements clearly stated 2 Introduction Not clearly

stated

Only 1 element clearly stated

All elements clearly stated 3 Methodology Only 1 element

fulfilled but not clearly stated

Only 1 element fulfilled and clearly stated

All elements fulfilled but not clearly stated

All elements fulfilled but 1 element not clearly stated

All elements fulfilled and clearly stated 4 Results and

Discussion

Results do not meet project’s objective

Results are available without

Results are available with wrong analysis

Results are available with correct analysis and

Results are available with correct

(6)

Page | 6 analysis and

discussion

and without discussion

without discussion

analysis and discussion 5 Conclusion No conclusion

on the

achievement of project objectives, No recommendati on of future work

Only 1 element fulfilled but not clearly stated

All element fulfilled but not clearly stated

All element fulfilled but only 1 element clearly stated

All element fulfilled and clearly stated

6 Format Wrong Paper structure and wrong format

Wrong paper structure but partially wrong format

Correct paper structure with more than 2 wrong formatting elements

Correct paper structure with less than or equal to 2 formatting elements

Correct paper and Correct Format

8.2 Project Presentation Evaluation (PPE)

Table 6. CO – PO Specifications for PPE

S. No Specification CO PO Maximum

Marks 1 Engagement: Appearance, gesture, voice & eye

contact

CO4 PO8, PO9, PO12, PSO3 20 2 Presentation Skills: Suitable Tone of Voice,

Fluent English usage, Effective Use of Presentation Aids, Convincing

CO5 PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

30

3 Content: The presentation slides should consist the followings: Introduction, Methodology / Project work, Results and Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation

CO3, CO6

PO1 to PO7, PO12, PSO1, PSO2

PO4, PO6, PO12, PSO1, PSO2, PSO3

20

4 Question and Answers: Ability to answer questions convincingly.

CO5 PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

30

Total 100 Table 7. Rubrics Evaluation form for PPE

S.No Specification Very Weak 1

Weak 2

Moderate 3

Strong 4

Very Strong 5 1 Engagement Not dressed

formally, no facial expression or eye contact

Not dressed formally, satisfactory facial expression and eye contact

Dressed formally, no facial expression and eye contact

dressed formally, regular facial expression and eye contact

dressed formally, consistent facial expression /eye contact 2 Presentation Skills No element is

fulfilled

Only 1 element is fulfilled

Only 2 elements are fulfilled

All elements are fulfilled 3 Content No element is

fulfilled

Only 1 element is fulfilled

All elements are fulfilled

(7)

Page | 7 4 Questions and

Answers

No Answers Answers not related to questions

Answers related to questions with poor points

Answers related to questions with good points

Good expression of ideas, very convincing

8.3 Final Report Evaluation (FRE)

Table 8. CO – PO Specifications for FRE

S. No Specification CO PO Maximum

Marks 1 Abstract: Students should be able to briefly

summarize what has been done, and also demonstrate the findings of the project

10

2 Introduction : Background of Study, Problem Statement, Problem Identification, Significance of the study, Objective, Scope of Work & Thesis Organization

3 Literature Review: Students should be able to review the references within the scope of study

& Students should also be able to perform analysis on previous works

10

4 Methodology/Project Work: Student should include the algorithm, flow charts or pseudo codes of the programming codes OR/AND;

Students should include the hardware design, block diagram, appropriate circuitry and relevant techniques towards achieving the project outcomes

CO2 PO4, PO5, PO12, PSO2, PSO3

30

5 Results and Discussion: Students should exhibit the significant results of the project, Students should be able to discus and analyze the results of the project

20

6 Conclusion: Students should be able to

conclude the findings in addressing the objective of the project

CO6 PO4, PO6, PO12, PSO1, PSO2, PSO3

10

7 References: Students should write the references in accordance to the specific format (i.e. IEEE format)

CO5 PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3 5

8 Others: Writing Style, Grammar & Compliance to the FYP standard/ guideline

CO5 PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3 5 Total 100

Table 9. Rubrics Evaluation form for FRE

S. No Specification Very Weak 1

Weak 2

Moderate 3

Strong 4

Very Strong 5 1 Abstract Not clearly stated Only 1 element

clearly stated

All elements clearly stated 2 Introduction Not clearly stated Only 1 element

clearly stated

All elements clearly stated

(8)

Page | 8

3 Literature Review

Literature Review irrelevant to study

Explain previous studies, but no discussions on pros and cons

Explain previous studies, with insufficient discussions on pros and cons

Explain previous Studies, with good discussions on pros and cons. No explanation of the need of study at the end

Explain previous studies related with good discussions on pros and cons, and finally explain the need of the study 4 Methodology

/Project Work

No relevant flowchart or block diagram and there is no procedures or techniques or experimental setup

No relevant flowchart or block Diagram.

The procedures or techniques or experimental setup are not in sequence, illogical, incomplete and unclear

There is relevant flowchart or block diagram and the procedures or techniques or experimental setup are partially in sequence, logical, complete and partially clear

There is relevant flowchart or block diagram and the procedures or techniques or experimental setup are in sequence, logical, complete and partially clear

There is relevant flowchart or block diagram and procedures or techniques or experimental setup are in sequence, logical, complete and very clear

5 Results and Discussion

Results do not meet project’s objective

Results are available without analysis and discussion

Results are available with wrong analysis and without discussion

Results are available with correct analysis and without discussion

Results are available with correct analysis and discussion 6 Conclusion No conclusion on

the achievement of project objectives, No

recommendation of future work

Only 1 element fulfilled but not clearly stated

All element fulfilled but not clearly stated

All element fulfilled but only 1 element clearly stated

All element fulfilled and clearly stated

7 References All references are in incorrect format

More than 5 references are in incorrect format

More than 3 references and less than or equal to 5 references are in incorrect format

More than 1 references and less than or equal to 3 references are in incorrect format

All references are in correct format

8 Others Very frequently used wrong choice of words with more than 30 grammatical errors. Wrong citations observed and does not follow the guidelines at all

Very seldom Used wrong choice of words with more than 20 grammatical error but less than or equal to 30 grammatical error. Wrong citations observed and does not follow the guidelines at all

Correctly used choice of words with more than 10 grammatical error but less than or equal to 20 grammatical errors. Correct citations observed and follow the guidelines

Correctly used choice of words and exists good transitions between statements. Has more than 5 grammatical errors but less than or equal to 10 grammatical errors. Correct citations observed and follow the guidelines

Good variation in using choice of words with good transitions and coherence between statements. Has less than 5 grammatical error with proper citations and compliance to guidelines

(9)

Page | 9

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

PROJECT WORK CONTINUOUS INTERNAL ASSESSMENT (CIA) FORM

Type of Evaluation - End of VII Semester / Mid VIII Semester / End of VIII Semester / Final CIA

Name of the Student : ___________________________________________________________

Roll Number : ___________________________________________________________

Department : ___________________________________________________________

Project Batch Number : ___________________________________________________________

Project Title : ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Name of the Supervisor : ___________________________________________________________

Please circle a number (1 = Very Weak, 2 = Weak, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Strong, 5 = Very Strong) S. No Specification Rubric Strength ^Maximum_Marks ^Obtained_Marks

1. Attendance 1 2 3 4 5 5

2. Creativity 1 2 3 4 5 5

3. Work progress 1 2 3 4 5 10

4. Demonstration and finding of results 1 2 3 4 5 10 Total 30 Signatures of Department Review Committee (DRC) Members:

DRC Members Name & Designation Date Signature

Head of the Department Project Coordinator Supervisor / Guide Senior Professor-1 Senior Professor-2

(10)

Page | 10

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

PROJECT WORK EVALUATION - SEMESTER END EXAMINATION (NON FSI)

Roll Number : ___________________________________________________________

Department : ___________________________________________________________

Project Title : ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Technical Paper Evaluation (TPE)

1. Abstract 1 2 3 4 5 10

2. Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 20

3. Methodology 1 2 3 4 5 30

4. Results and Discussion 1 2 3 4 5 20

5. Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 10

6. Format 1 2 3 4 5 10

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded TPE (a) 10 Project Presentation Evaluation (PPE)

S. No Specification Rubric Strength ^Maximum

Marks

Obtained Marks

1. Engagement 1 2 3 4 5 20

2. Presentation Skills 1 2 3 4 5 30

3. Content 1 2 3 4 5 20

4. Question and Answers 1 2 3 4 5 30

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded PPE (b) 30

(11)

Page | 11 Final Report Evaluation (FRE)

S. No Specification Rubric Strength ^Maximum_Marks ^Obtained_Marks

1. Abstract 1 2 3 4 5 10

3. Literature Review 1 2 3 4 5 10

4. Methodology/Project Work 1 2 3 4 5 30

6. Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 10

7. References 1 2 3 4 5 5

8. Others 1 2 3 4 5 5

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded FRE (c) 30

Total Marks Awarded (a + b + c) 70

In Words:

Signatures of Project Review Committee (PRC) Members:

PRC Members Name & Designation Date Signature

External Examiner Head of the Department Project Coordinator Supervisor / Guide Dean (UG & PG) Dean (R&D)

Controller of Examinations PRINCIPAL

(12)

Page | 12

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

RESEARCH PROJECT WORK EVALUATION - SEMESTER END EXAMINATION FULL SEMESTER INTERNSHIP (FSI)

Roll Number : ___________________________________________________________

Department : ___________________________________________________________

Project Title : ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Technical Paper Evaluation (TPE)

1. Abstract 1 2 3 4 5 10

3. Methodology 1 2 3 4 5 30

5. Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 10

6. Format 1 2 3 4 5 10

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded TPE (a) 30 Project Presentation Evaluation (PPE)

S. No Specification Rubric Strength ^Maximum

Marks

Obtained Marks

1. Engagement 1 2 3 4 5 20

2. Presentation Skills 1 2 3 4 5 30

3. Content 1 2 3 4 5 20

4. Question and Answers 1 2 3 4 5 30

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded PPE (b) 20

(13)

Page | 13 Final Report Evaluation (FRE)

S. No Specification Rubric Strength ^Maximum_Marks ^Obtained_Marks

1. Abstract 1 2 3 4 5 10

3. Literature Review 1 2 3 4 5 10

4. Methodology/Project Work 1 2 3 4 5 30

6. Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 10

7. References 1 2 3 4 5 5

8. Others 1 2 3 4 5 5

Evaluated Sub Total 100 Assessed / Rounded FRE (c) 20

Total Marks Awarded (a + b + c) 70 In Words:

Signatures of Project Review Committee (PRC) Members:

PRC Members Name & Designation Date Signature

External Examiner Head of the Department Project Coordinator Supervisor / Guide Dean (UG & PG) Dean (R&D)

Controller of Examinations PRINCIPAL

(14)

Page | 14

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRE – B.TECH PROJECT WORK

Roll Number : ___________________________________________________________

Department : ___________________________________________________________

Project Title : ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

1. How did you plan and implement your project? (1-2 sentences, attach the detailed plan)

[CO1 - PO1 to PO4, PO11, PO12, PSO1]

2. How important would it be to continue learning about engineering, upgrading your skills throughout your lifetime of employment? Why is this important? (1-2 sentences) [CO2 - PO4, PO5, PO12]

3. What contemporary issues in society and your branch of Engineering do you see as being related to your project, or its topical area? What impact do you think a project or topic like this has on your responsibilities in particular, and on society in general? (3-4 sentences) [CO3 - PO1 to PO7, PO12]

4. Explain your role in your team and the role of your supervisor in successful completion of your project.

(2-3 sentences) [CO4 - PO8, PO9, PO12, PSO3]

5. Write in brief the concepts and analyses used in your project and the main result of your project.

(3-4 sentences) [CO5 - PO10, PO12, PSO2, PSO3]

6. What impact does your project, or research in the area of your project, have on the global community in general, and on our society in particular? (1-3 sentences) [CO6 - PO4, PO6, PO12]

Date: Signature

(15)

Page | 15

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

End Semester Project Work Outcomes Summary by Supervisor

Roll Number : ___________________________________________________________

Department : ___________________________________________________________

Project Title : ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Please circle a number (1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent) in response to the following questions about your student and your interaction with him / her either individually, or in a design group.

Note: Circling NA means that question is not applicable, or that you don’t know:

S. No Specification Rubric Strength

1. Ability to plan and implement an investigative or developmental

project given general objectives and guidelines. 1 2 3 4 5 NA 2. In-depth skill to use some laboratory, modern tools and techniques. 1 2 3 4 5 NA 3. Ability to analyze data to produce useful information and to draw

conclusions by systematic deduction. 1 2 3 4 5 NA

4. Facilitate significant individualized interactions between faculty

members and students through a multi-term research experience. 1 2 3 4 5 NA 5. Ability to communicate results, concepts, analyses and ideas in

written and oral form. 1 2 3 4 5 NA

6. Conduct an extended independent investigation that results in the

production of a research thesis. 1 2 3 4 5 NA

Date: Signature of the Supervisor

(16)

Page | 16

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(Autonomous)

EXIT INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

The information you provide on this questionnaire will be kept completely confidential.

Name of the Student : ______________________________________________________________

Roll Number : ______________________________________________________________

Department : ______________________________________________________________

Year of Graduation : ______________________________________________________________

Permanent Address : ______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Mobile Number : ______________________________________________________________

E-mail address : ______________________________________________________________

Please take a few minutes to answer the following questions. Your answers to the questions and your feedback will assist the department to continue upgrading the program and to better serve its students and the community. Some of the questions need to be answered on a scale of 1 to 5.

(Please circle a number, 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent).

PART I: GENERAL

1. What courses in your Program did you like the best? Explain.

2. What courses belonging to your branch did you like the best? Explain.

3. What courses in the Program, the training that you received is effective?

(17)

Page | 17 4. Are you considering post-graduate studies right after your graduation or in the future? If yes, would

you consider IARE? Why?

5. Do you have a job offer? If yes, where, and what is your initial salary?

To what extent did each of the following contribute to:

6 How do you rate the training that you received in the mathematics

and physics courses? 1 2 3 4 5

7 How do you rate the overall training that you received? 1 2 3 4 5 8 How did the faculty respond to your technical needs inside and outside

of classrooms? 1 2 3 4 5

9 How helpfully did the lab technicians respond to your needs? 1 2 3 4 5 10 How did the course scheduling meet your time constraints? 1 2 3 4 5 11 How do you feel the program prepared you for Computer Science and

Engineering career? 1 2 3 4 5

12 How would you rate the student/faculty interaction in the program? 1 2 3 4 5 13 How effective was the counseling from your CSE faculty advisor?

Explain:

1 2 3 4 5

14 How effective was the counseling from career guidance advisor?

Explain:

1 2 3 4 5

15 How would you rate the laboratory facilities? Explain: 1 2 3 4 5

16 How would you rate the classrooms and laboratory environment? 1 2 3 4 5

(18)

Page | 18

PART II: OUTCOMES

At this time you should have attained the required professional, technical, and social experience in the program to practice the following twelve program outcomes. Please mark on a scale of 1 to 5 (Please circle a number, 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent) to indicate your knowledge with the ability to:

1 I have gained an in-depth knowledge of mathematics, science,

Computer Science, electronics and electrical engineering. 1 2 3 4 5 2 I have an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. 1 2 3 4 5

3 I am able to design digital and analog systems pertaining to electrical

systems. 1 2 3 4 5

4 I am able to design electrical and electronics circuits and conduct experiments with electrical engineering as well as to analyze and interpret data.

1 2 3 4 5

5 I had the opportunity to acquire new knowledge to use modern engineering tools, software and equipment to analyze problems necessary for engineering practice.

1 2 3 4 5

6 I have an ability to recognize the impact of engineering on society. 1 2 3 4 5 7 I have an ability to recognize the impact of the professional engineering

solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.

1 2 3 4 5

8 I had the opportunity to understand professional and ethical

responsibility. 1 2 3 4 5

9 I have an ability to function effectively as an individual, and as a

member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings. 1 2 3 4 5 1 10 I am able to communicate effectively in both verbal and written form. 1 2 3 4 5 2 11 I had Knowledge of contemporary issues to undertake innovative

projects. I have the training necessary to visualize and work on multidisciplinary tasks.

1 2 3 4 5

3 12 I am able to develop confidence for self-education and to understand the value of life-long learning. I had the opportunity to use the techniques and skills to face and succeed in competitive examinations like GATE, GRE, TOEFL, GMAT etc.

1 2 3 4 5

PART III: COMMENTS

Make additional comments as you desire.

Thanks for your time!

Date: Signature