• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry

February 2018

(2)

Criteria contacts

Pawan Agrawal

Chief Analytical Officer – CRISIL Ratings Email: [email protected]

Somasekhar Vemuri

Senior Director – Rating Criteria and Product Development

Email: [email protected] Sameer Charania

Director – Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: [email protected]

Manish Kumar Gupta Director - CRISIL Ratings Email: [email protected] In case of any feedback or queries, you may write to us at [email protected]

(3)

Executive Summary

Sugar is the most important agriculture-based industry in India after textiles. India is the largest producer, after Brazil, and the largest consumer of sugar. Sugar production depends on sugarcane output, which depends on rainfall. Moreover, sugarcane prices are regulated by the government while sugar prices are market-driven. Also, the industry is cyclical and is susceptible to price fluctuations and trade regulations. While cane production is concentrated between September and April, demand for sugar lasts through the year. CRISIL's approach to rating sugar companies involves an evaluation of their financial position and cash flow in the context of their ability to withstand cyclical downturns. In CRISIL's experience, companies with strong businesses and operational efficiency, and low interest cost, have consistently withstood sugar price downturns.

Scope

While the broader criteria for manufacturing companies1 applies to all sugar companies, this article2 details the industry-specific factors impacting the credit risk profiles of sugar producers.

Business Risk

Government policies

The sugar industry is regulated extensively by the government. Hence, CRISIL believes a sugar company's credit risk profile is significantly vulnerable to government policies. These policies influence cost through cane pricing and cane availability through the command area concept. The government also controls import/export of sugar through imposition duty.

Consequently, sugar companies do not have much control over the quantity, quality, or cost of sugarcane they procure, or the quantity of sugar they sell. These factors significantly affect the economics of their operations.

Market position

In the highly fragmented sugar industry, size is an important determinant of a company’s market position. Large companies typically have greater ability to withstand external shocks, easier access to capital markets, and greater bargaining power, and consequently, tend to have strong credit risk profile. However, the benefit of size may be nullified by a weak capital structure or poor cost position.

1 The detailed criteria is present on the CRISIL website under the ‘Criteria and Methodology’ section—Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies and CRISIL’s Approach to Financial Ratios.

2 For accessing the previous published document on “ Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry”, kindly follow below mentioned link:

https://www.crisil.com/content/dam/crisil/criteria_methodology/consumer-staples/archive/CRISIL-Ratings-crieria-sugar-

(4)

Other factors affecting market position

Location

Freight is an important cost element. Companies with factories close to sugar-deficit regions command a better price and save on freight costs. Factories close to high-yielding sugarcane farms are also in a better position.

Similarly, the longer crushing season in southern India enables better utilisation of fixed assets.

Proximity to ports is also a critical factor. Easy accessibility to ports enables import of raw sugar for processing during cyclical upturns, when sugarcane availability is expected to be lower. It also provides companies with greater flexibility to export during periods of low domestic prices.

Customer profile

Traditionally, sugar sales have been routed through dealers. Relationships with institutional customers may be viewed favourably, partly due to the benefits of regular liquidation of inventory outside the government's release mechanism.

Relationship with farmers

Variability in monsoon and changing crop patterns impact cane output and consequently sugar production. This makes healthy relationship with farmers a crucial requirement for sugar companies, to ensure availability of cane.

Hence, investments in sugarcane development activity and timely payments for sugarcane are considered pre- requisites for timely and adequate availability of cane.

Operating efficiency

With prices of sugarcane being regulated through fair and remunerative price (FRP) mechanism, operating efficiency (determined by recovery rate) and processing cost will determine ability to withstand downturns. CRISIL believes larger plants are better placed, as their conversion cost will be low.

Level of Integration

Optimal utilisation of by-products such as molasses (used to produce ethanol) and bagasse (used to generate power), is another key differentiating factor. It will enable companies to capture value across the production chain.

Integrated sugar mills with biomass power plant are more likely to be successful. An integrated sugar company functions on a de-risked model, which results in higher revenue and stable profitability.

Working capital management

While cane production is concentrated between September and April, demand for sugar lasts through the year.

Therefore, sugar producers have to efficiently manage their seasonal working capital requirements amidst fluctuating prices, a crucial credit differentiator.

(5)

Financial risk

For the analysis of the financial risk of a sugar company, CRISIL follows the standard criteria used for all manufacturing companies. This criterion is presented in detail in our publications, 'Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies' and 'CRISIL's Approach to Financial Ratios'.

Management risk

For analysing the management risk of sugar manufacturers, CRISIL follows the standard criteria used for all manufacturing companies. This criteria is presented in detail in our publication, ‘Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies’.

Conclusion

Thus, in CRISIL's opinion, the key success factors for sugar companies include:

• Scale of operations, recovery rate3

• Forward integration into power and distillery operations

• Location of plant and relationship with farmers

• Diversity in client base and geography

(6)

Argentina | China | Hong Kong | India | Poland | Singapore | UK | USA

CRISIL Limited: CRISIL House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai – 400076. India

About CRISIL Limited

CRISIL is an agile and innovative, global analytics company driven by its mission of making markets function better. We are India’s foremost provider of ratings, data, research, analytics and solutions. A strong track record of growth, culture of innovation and global footprint sets us apart. We have delivered independent opinions, actionable insights, and efficient solutions to over 100,000 customers.

We are majority owned by S&P Global Inc., a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide.

About CRISIL Ratings

CRISIL Ratings is part of CRISIL Limited (“CRISIL”). We pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987.

CRISIL is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”).

With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, CRISIL sets the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 24,500 large and mid-scale corporates and financial institutions. CRISIL has also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially guaranteed instruments and microfinance institutions. We also pioneered a globally unique rating service for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and significantly extended the accessibility to rating services to a wider market. Over 1,10,000 MSMEs have been rated by us.

CRISIL Privacy Notice

CRISIL respects your privacy. We use your contact information, such as your name, address, and email id, to fulfil your request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL and other parts of S&P Global Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) you may find of interest.

For further information, or to let us know your preferences with respect to receiving marketing materials, please visit www.crisil.com/privacy. You can view the Company’s Customer Privacy at https://www.spglobal.com/privacy Last updated: April 2016

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

CRISIL Ratings has published a separate document that outlines the criteria for rating Basel III-compliant non-equity Tier I and Tier II instruments Refer to ‘Rating criteria for Basel

Conclusion CRISIL Ratings considers business mix, market position, investment policy and quality, risk management, capitalisation, earnings, and liquidity as the business and

Business risk assessment Financial risk assessment Overall credit risk profile • Market position • Operating efficiency • Accounting quality • Financial position based on

Factors that CRISIL considers for its assessment include: o Contracts governing future cash flow, tenure of contracts and its permanency, and re-pricing risk of contracts o

CRISIL also assesses the following factors to determine performance efficiency: • Plant utilisation levels • Power availability, tariff levels, extent of back-up, and facility for

Letter of Credit 7 CRISIL A3 Term Loan 11 CRISIL BBB-/Positive Criteria Details Links to related criteria CRISILs Approach to Financial Ratios Rating criteria for manufaturing and

CRISIL has published a separate document that outlines the criteria for rating Basel III-compliant non-equity Tier I and Tier II instruments Refer to CRISIL Rating criteria for BASEL

CRISIL believes that a company's cost position depends on: • its ability to access inputs at low cost • quality of ore reserves • ease of mining parameters such as overburden ratio,