View of RECENT ANALYSIS ON INFLUENCE OF INVASIVE ENVIRONMENTS CONCEPTS ON PORTLAND SLAG CEMENT CONCRETE

(1)

72 RECENT ANALYSIS ON INFLUENCE OF INVASIVE ENVIRONMENTS CONCEPTS ON

PORTLAND SLAG CEMENT CONCRETE Sidhharth Pandey

Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya, Bhopal (M.P.) Rajesh Joshi

Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya, Bhopal (M.P.)

Abstract - The durability of concrete depends on how it withstands changes in air, temperature, humidity, the amount of impurities in the air, and environmental effects such as sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides. These environmental effects reduce the durability of concrete by changing the structure of the bonds between the individual materials. Concrete must be impermeable in order for the structure to be more durable.

In this study, M30 grade Portland slag cement concrete produced with and without mixtures and with or without rebar specimens was examined to investigate the various environmental impacts on the concrete. Additional samples were cured for 178 days in marine and acidic environments. Samples cured in potable water for a period of 28days and later in 5% concentrated hydrochloric acid, 5% concentrated acetic acid and marine environment for a period of another 150days is also considered for studying the behaviour of concrete under different environments.

The effect of different environments was evaluated by comparing the compressive strength, percentage of water absorption, and weight loss of samples exposed to different environments. All specimens exposed to different environments show a loss in compressive strength, loss in weight and increase in water absorption with age compared to 28days curing results.

Micrological properties were studied through SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy), EDAX (Energy Dispersive Xray Spectroscopy) and XRD (Xray Diffraction) on samples after 28 days and 178 days curing. The SEM analysis confirmed pore refinement with age. The phase identification analysis in XRD indicated the presence of calcium carbonate and silica.

Keywords: Portland Slag Cement (PSC), Compressive strength, Water absorption, Weight loss, SEM, EDAX, XRD.

1 INTRODUCTION

Concrete exposed to the environment must withstand bad weather called durability. Concrete is affected by the air environment (carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, suspended particulate matter) and can lead to deterioration of concrete. The air temperature, wind velocity, rainfall, and relative humidity will also affect concrete durability (Almusallam, 2001).

Concrete is gaining special importance in sewer, marine environment and in nuclear power plants, where concrete is exposed to aggressive environmental conditions like wastewater, chemical attack (sulfate and chloride), acidic and alkaline, salt spray, chloride diffusion, sulfate attack, and high ambient temperatures. Such conditions lead to mass loss, corrosion of reinforced concrete and finally the failure of the structure before expected lifetime.

Concrete structures get deteriorated in different environments like coastal/marine environment, harsh environment where high temperature and high humidity are present, acidic environment, sewer environment. When RCC structures get deteriorate within a decade after construction is called as accelerated deterioration. The accelerated deterioration of concrete may be due to the invasive environment reacting on concrete, quality of aggregate, quantity of paste content, and several internal casual chemical reactions between concrete ingredients, further due to lack of skilled labor while construction also leads to accelerated deterioration.

2. EFFECT OF AN ACIDIC ENVIRONMENT

As an engineering material, concrete can be directly exposed to all kinds of acidic environments. Acidic media have a wide range of sources and can be produced by industrial processes and some urban

(2)

73 activities. The soil may contain a variety

of acids. As a result of bacteriological activity, some organic and inorganic acids can be produced in seawater. Significant amounts of free acid can be found in plants and factories. Air pollution from gaseous carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides is widespread.

Environmental water and atmospheric precipitation can be two major causes of acid-affected concrete structure corrosion.

In such an acidic environment, the strength of concrete and its corresponding structural stability are minimized (Wang et al., 2017). The pH value of the concrete pore solution is strongly related to the hydration phase present in the concrete. Ion leaching also causes chemical and mineralogical zoning, as the dissolution of various hydrates during leaching is directly dependent on their dissolution properties in relation to the decrease in pH (Plusquellec et al., 2017).

Examination of crack patterns on concrete surface. Cracks can occur due to the expansion of the concrete surface when the concrete is exposed to acids such as sulfuric acid and a mixture of sodium sulphate in water pipes. The swelling of concrete occurs when the calcium silicate hydrate gel and calcium hydroxide react with the surrounding acid to form anhydrous silicate. These anhydrous silicates are very porous and increase the diffusion of acids from the environment, eventually causing desquamation. The range revolves around the level of acidity in the environment (Girardi et al., 2010).

3. RESEARCH SCOPE

Concrete is exposed to different environment in its life time. Concrete is resistant to most natural environments and many chemicals. Some chemicals, however, can attack concrete and cause deterioration. Many admixtures are used to concrete to withstand the environmental effect. The addition of fly ash, rice husk ash, Metakaolin, silica fume, and blast furnace slag was found to be supportive in improving in stability and durability of concrete. Studies have been carried out so far on slag concrete where, slag is introduced in concrete along with ordinary Portland cement.

However, in the present study Portland

stag cement is used instead of adding admixture. Portland slag cement is chosen because it exhibits better resistance to chloride ion penetration and also makes the concrete impermeable than other cements. The strength and durability studies on concrete made using Portland slag cement are very few and are not comprehensively addressed. An attempt has been made to study the strength of concrete made using Portland slag cement that was exposed to different environments.

Over the past few decades, several studies have been conducted on the effects of one or two invasive environments on Portland slag cement concrete. This study addresses the effects of marine, acidic and organic environments on Portland slag cement concrete.

3.1 Objectives

Based at the scope of the studies the unique targets proposed for the existing examine includes

1. Evaluating bodily homes of Portland slag cement and different number one substances for designing M30 grade concrete.

2. To examine the impact of the distinctive surroundings at the compressive power of concrete made with Portland slag cement.

3. To examine the share of water absorption and percent weight reduction of Portland slag cement concrete uncovered to distinctive environments.

4. To examine the impact at the corrosion of reinforcement with and without epoxy resin coating uncovered to distinctive environments.

5. To validate the compressive power take a look at effects the use of Chi- Square take a look at.

6. To examine the microstructural homes of Portland slag cement concrete uncovered to distinctive surroundings the use of SEM, EDAX, and XRD.

4. TESTS ON AGGREGATES

Aggregates are essential constituents in concrete, they build body to the concrete and reduce shrinkage. Aggregates can be

(3)

74 classified into (i) Normal weight

aggregates, (ii) Light weight aggregates and (iii) Heavy weight aggregates. In the present study normal weight aggregates were used and the properties of the same were investigated.

Grading pattern of a sample as course aggregate or fine aggregate is assessed by sieving a sample successively through all the sieves mounted one over the other in order of size, with larger sieve on the top. The material retained on each sieve after shaking, represents the fraction of aggregate coarser than the sieve in question and finer than the sieve above. The fineness modulus (FM) of fine aggregate gives an idea about particular size of aggregate. Higher the value of FM, the coarser the aggregate. Generally, a lower FM results in more paste, making the concrete easier to finish.

4.1 Fineness Modulus of fine Aggregate Fineness modulus was found as per IS:

2386 – (PARTI) 1963. Using each of the specified series of sieves, the summation of the total amount to aggregate retained on them can be found. 500 grams of sand was taken and placed on top of 40mm sieve. Sieves were arranged in order and were held perfectly between hands and shacked properly and the weight retained on each sieve is weighed.

5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Those display study might have been an endeavor should recognize how the Portland slag bond cement behaves under diverse natural states. Similarly as examined in the past section the cement specimens were laid open should seven distinctive situations starting with every environment, the specimens were tried for their quality properties, sturdiness properties, also microstructural Investigation. The display single section examines those effects for strength, weight loss, water absorption; Also micrological dissection about Portland slag bond cement presented will separate situations.

5.1 Tests on Aggregates

In the present study normal weight aggregates were use and the properties of the same were investigated. The results

for aggregate properties are furnished below

5.1.1 Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregate

The fineness modulus for bond will be a experimental figure gotten Eventually including the aggregate rate of the example for a aggravator retained with respect to every of a specified arrangement about sieves, Also isolating the whole of cash by 100. Fineness modulus might have been found Likewise for every IS: 2386 - a feature i 1963. Table 5.1 provides for the gradation of fine aggravator.

Table 5.1 Gradation of fine aggregate

5.1.2 Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate

Specific gravity of sand was found as per IS 2386-3 (1963) and the following investigations were made and the test result is shown in Table 5.2.

M1 = Wt. of bottle

M2 = Wt. of bottle + sand

M3 = Wt. of bottle + sand + water M4 = Wt. of bottle +water

Table 5.2 Specific gravity of sand

Formula: Specific gravity of sand = (M2 – M1) / ((M4 –M1) – (M3 –M2))

The average specific gravity of sand =2.69 The specific gravity of sand should lie between 2.5 to 3.0 according to the Indian standard IS: 2386-3 (1963). So the sand can be accepted for the study.

(4)

75 5.1.3 Specific Gravity and Water

Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

Aggravator absorption will be those expansions previously, impostor because of water in the pores of the material.

Those particular gravity of Different regular aggregates might have been dead set as for every is 2386 piece 3- 1963 of the Indian standard code. The particular gravity about common coarse aggravator might have been assessed in the lab and the outcomes need aid provided for beneath.

Weight of aggregate in mesh when saturated in water =1.3kg

Weight of aggregate taken = 2kg 5.2 Tests on Cements

Research center tests were directed for bond on assess its fineness, consistency introductory setting time, last setting time, particular gravity compressive quality of bonds and mortality table cubes. The test comes about would outfitted beneath.

5.2.1 Fineness of Cement

Fineness of cement was found according to IS: 4031 and the results are as given below:

Weight of cement taken on I.S sieve = 100g

Weight of residue after sieving (X g) = 2g Fineness percentage = (X*100)/100 = X Fineness of cement = 2%.

5.2.2 Sp. Gravity of Cement

The specific gravity of cement was found using specific gravity bottle method according to IS code: 2720-3-1 (1980).

The results of the specific gravity for cement are given below Table 5.3:

Table 5.3 Specific gravity of cement

Formula: Sp. gravity of kerosene, Sk = (M3-M1)/ (M2-M1)

Sp.gravity of cement, Sc = (M5)*SK / (M5+

M3- M4)

The average specific gravity of cement=2.69

5.3 Analysis of Water Sample

The locally available water is tested for suitability of the sample for making concrete and the results are furnished below (Table 5.8)

Table 5.4 Water quality parameters

Based on the above test results the water is recommended for construction purposes.

5.4 Slump Test

Those cement droop test measures the consistency of new cement in the recent past it sets. It is performed on weigh the workability about newly aggravated concrete, Also In the simplicity with which cement streams. It might additionally make utilized similarly as a pointer for improperly blended clump.

The workability test might have been performed on the cement blend about M30 evaluation done extent 1:1.

50:2. 34 for a water-cement proportion from claiming 0.4 as for every IS: 1199- 1959. Those droop from claiming cement

= 80mm.

5.5 Effect of Different Environments on Compressive Strength of Concrete Lab tests were directed on barrel shaped examples toward bringing three replicas starting with each body of evidence under seven different situations with a measure for 75mm breadth and 150mm tallness.

The examples were cured over marine water (ME), exchange wet and dry over marine water (AW), ocean salt spread state (MI), and 5% amassed acidic corrosive (OE) specimens cured under those administration of mainly accessible water for 28days et cetera presented with marine water (LM), 5% amassed acidic corrosive (LO), 5% moved hydrochloric corrosive (LA) dependent upon An period about 178days. The specimens were tried to compressive quality in a time about 7, 14, 21, 28, 58, 88, 118, 148 and 178days.

(5)

76 The effects need aid tabulated furnished

to appendix-2 from table no. A2. 1 should A2. 7.

The Figures starting with figures 5.1 with 5.28 demonstrate the examination the middle of that compressive quality about examples ready under different instances presented to diverse situations.

5.5.1 Comparison between Case-1, Case-4, and Case-7

Those Figures from 5.1 should 5.7 indicates the variety from claiming compressive quality vs curing time of specimens arranged without at whatever admixture. Every last one of tests attained most extreme quality toward 28days curing there following the compressive quality declines because of in length purposes of presentation from claiming tests to obtrusive surroundings.

Starting with that figure 5.1 it is watched that the rate of diminishing about compressive quality for instances 1, 4 & 7 following 28days is 3.25%, 4.13%

4.15% respectively, at specimens were cured in potable water starting with 0 will 28days Also progressively cured clinched alongside acidic corrosive 28days should 178 days (LO). Those rate of decline about compressive quality after 28 days, The point when specimens were cured for potable water from 0 will 28 days from that point onwards cured Previously, saline water to 28 days on 178 days(LM) will be 2.5%, 2.62%, 2.62% separately to cases 1, 4, and 7 may be indicated done figure 5.2. To the specimens cured over potable water starting with 0 with 28 days from that point onwards cured done hydrochloric corrosive for 28 days on 178 days (LA), those rate of decline about compressive quality may be 4.33%, 4.79%

also 4.25%, separately to instances 1, 4, 7 (Figure 5.3). Concerning illustration seen from figure 5.4, the place the specimens were cured in saline water starting with 0 should 178 days (ME), those rate of diminish from claiming compressive quality done case-1 is 2. 68%, done case- 4 may be 2.84% clinched alongside case-7 is 2.92%. Those compressive quality declines to every last one of instances (case 1,4 and 7) and the rate for diminishing will be 3.12%, 3.29% 3.60%, individually (Figure 5.5), The point when

cured on acidic corrosive starting with 0 should 178 days (OE).

Fig. 5.1 Compressive strength vs curing period in LO environment for

Case 1, 4 & 7

Fig. 5.2 Compressive strength vs curing period in LM environment for

Case 1, 4 & 7

Fig. 5.3 Compressive strength vs curing period in LA environment for

Case 1, 4 & 7

Fig. 5.4 Compressive strength vs curing period in ME environment for

Case 1, 4 & 7

Fig. 5.5 Compressive strength vs curing period in OE environment for

Case 1, 4 & 7

(6)

77 Fig. 5.6 Compressive strength vs

curing period in AW environment for Case 1, 4 & 7

Fig. 5.7 Compressive quality vs curing period in mi earth for instance 1, 4 &

7.

5.5.2 Comparison between Case-2 and Case-5

The Figures from 5.8 on 5.14 indicates the variety about compressive quality vs curing time for tests readied for calcium nitrate salt similarly as a admixture.

Every last one of specimens attained greatest quality toward 28days curing, there following expressions the compressive quality abatements because of broad presentation for specimens with irritating earth.

Case 2 & 5

Fig 5.9 Compressive strength vs curing period in LM environment for Case 2 &

5

Case 2 & 5

Fig. 5.12 Compressive strength vs curing period in OE environment for

Case 2 & 5

Fig. 5.13 Compressive strength vs curing period in AW environment for

Case 2 & 5

Fig. 5.14 Compressive strength vs curing period in MI environment for

Case 2 & 5

(7)

78 5.5.3 Comparison between Case-3 and

Case-6

Figures starting with 5.15 with 5.21 indicates the variety for compressive quality vs curing period from claiming specimens readied for calcium nitrate built economically accessible admixture.

Every last one of tests attained greatest quality at 28 days curing then afterward expressions those compressive quality declines because of far reaching presentation about specimens will irritating earth.

The rate of diminishing about compressive quality (Figure 5.15) after 28 days on case-3 is 3.80%, clinched alongside case-6 may be 3.65% is watched to tests cured in mainly accessible water from 0 will 28 days and progressively cured previously, acidic corrosive up to 178 days (LO) type the figure 5.15. Type those figure 5.16 the rate about expansion done diminish from claiming compressive quality following 28 days previously, case-3 is 2. 62%, and on case-6 may be 2.65% is watched when tests cured generally accessible water from 0 with 28 days Also from that point onwards cured Previously, saline water for 28 days on 178 days (LM). In the event that from claiming tests cured on potable water from 0 should 28 days from that point cured previously, hydrochloric corrosive to 178 days (LA), the rate from claiming expand in decline about compressive quality following 28days clinched alongside case-3 is 4.18%, also over case-6 is 4.18% might have been watched. In the event of tests cured On saline water starting with 0 with 178 days (ME), it camwood a chance to be watched (Figure 5.17) that (Figure 5.18) those rate from claiming diminish about compressive quality after 28days Previously, case-3 will be 2.6%, and for case-6 is 2.63%.

Case 3 & 6

Fig. 5.16 Compressive strength vs curing period in LM environment for

Case 3 & 6

5.5.4 Comparison Compressive Strength in Different Environments in Each Case

That figure 5.19 demonstrates change done compressive quality vs curing period on the whole situations under Case-1. It could be watched that the sum tests ready without admixture also without support attained focus quality of 30.55 N/mm2 during a time about 28 days but on account of marine environment, exchange wet and dry environment, misting earth specimens set over natural nature's domain. Under the case-1 most noteworthy rate of quality reduction at 178 days might have been watched for acidic surroundings regarding 22% when contrasted with for their particular should 28 days quality. Most reduced rate quality reduction 11.88% might have been found around over lm (Sample cured over generally accessible water for 28 times trailed by curing over marine

(8)

79 environment) and the specimens cured in

saline water (ME) this misfortune may be around 13.52%.

Fig. 5.19 Compressive strength vs curing period in all environments

under Case-1

5.6 Effect of Different Environments on Water Absorption of Specimen Before testing for compressive strength the samples cured in different environments were tested for water absorption and the results were tabulated in Appendix-2 Table no A2.9.

The following section describes the comparison between water absorption of different specimens cured in different environments.

5.6.1 Comparison of water absorption in different environments under case- 1, 4 & 7

Those Figures from 5.19 indicates the variety of rate of water absorption vs curing period about tests ready without any admixture. Every last one of tests demonstrated most reduced rate of water absorption during 28 days curing there following those rate of water absorption increments because of in length purposes of presentation for specimens on obtrusive situations. Also additionally it is watched that those tests readied without admixture Also support covered for epoxy tar (case-7) indicate a relatively higher rate of water absorption On the whole seven diverse situations.

From those figure 5.20 it is watched that the rate about expansion to rate water absorption for tests for cases 1, 4 & 7 will be 0.15%, 0.25% 0.29%

respectively, The point when specimens were cured in nearby water from 0 with 28 days and consequently cured done acidic corrosive up to 178 days (LO).

Those rate of increment over rate water absorption for specimens cured clinched alongside nearby water from 0 will 28days

and from that point cured clinched alongside saline water for up to 178 days (LM) may be 0.25%, 0.37% 0. 36%

separately to cases 1,4, also 7 Concerning illustration seen done figure 5.20. To the specimens cured clinched alongside neighborhood water starting with 0 with 28days and from that point onwards cured over hydrochloric corrosive 178 days (LA), the rate from claiming expand to rate water absorption will be 0. 27%, 0.34% and 0.54%, individually to instances 1, 4, 7 (Figure 5.21). Likewise seen from figure 5.22, the place the specimens were cured previously, saline water from 0 should 178 days (ME), those rate about rate water absorption over case-1 may be 0. 08%, clinched alongside case-4 is 0. 10% done case-7 is 0. 06%.

The rate water absorption expands for every last one of cases (case 1, 4 and 7) and the rate about expansion may be 0.28%, 0.45% 0.59%, respectively, at cured clinched alongside acidic corrosive from 0 with 178 days (OE).

Fig. 5.20 %Water absorption vs curing period in LO environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

Fig. 5.21 %Water absorption vs curing period in LM environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

Fig. 5.22 %Water absorption vs curing period in LA environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

(9)

80 Fig. 5.23 %Water absorption vs curing

period in ME environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

Fig. 5.24 %Water absorption vs curing period in OE environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

Fig. 5.25 %Water absorption vs curing period in MI environment for Case-1, 4

Fig. 5.26 %Water absorption vs curing period in AW environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

5.7 Effect of Different Environments on %Weight Loss of Samples

When testing for compressive quality the tests cured in distinctive situations were tried to rate weight reduction and the effects were tabulated over Appendix-2 table no A2. 10.

The taking after graphs (Figure 5.27 with 5.29) indicates the examination the middle of percent weight misfortune about distinctive examples made under

distinctive instances cured in distinctive situations.

5.7.1 Comparison of % Weight Loss in Different Environments under Case-1, 4 & 7

Those Emulating Figures starting with 5.27 to 5.29 reveals to variety of rate weight reduction vs curing period about specimens ready without admixture.

Those specimens readied without whatever admixture also support (case-1) indicates an similarly higher rate of weight misfortune over tests ready with support. Every last one of tests demonstrates weight increase up to 28 days curing period because of increment of thickness about examples. Those increment for thickness may be created because of arrangement for calcium silicate hydrate gel which will be filling the pores clinched alongside cement.

From those figure 5.27 it is watched that those rate from claiming build on rate weight misfortune from claiming tests to cases 1, 4 & 7 then afterward 28 days is 3.51 %, 2.71%

2.47% respectively, when specimens cured to potable water dependent upon 28days consequently cured for acidic corrosive dependent upon 178 days (LO).

Similarly, to saline water curing (LM) the weight misfortune might have been watched as 3.37%, 3.78% 3.49% to case 1, 4 7 individually (Figure 5.28) also for tests cured for hydrochloric corrosive (LA) those weight misfortune watched Similarly as 3. 49%, 3.57%, 4.24% to situation 1, 4, 7 separately (Figure 5.29).

For both lm also la those tests were procured clinched alongside nearby water to 28 days. Concerning illustration seen starting with figure 5. 60, the place the tests were cured On saline water starting with 0 to 178 days (ME), those rate from claiming rate weight passing clinched alongside done case-1 may be 1.20%, over case-4 is 1.22% done case-7 is 1.22%.

Those rate weight passing increments to every last one of situations (case 1, 4 also 7) and the rate of build will be 1.69%, 2.45% also 2.06%, separately (Figure 5.

30), The point when cured in acidic corrosive starting with 0 to 178 days (OE).

(10)

81 Fig. 5.27 % Weight loss vs curing

period in LO environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

Fig. 5.28 % Weight loss vs curing period in LM environment for Case-1, 4

& 7

5.8 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDAX)

SEM is a sort about electron magnifying instrument that produces a picture of a example Eventually filtering those surface with a centered pillar about electrons.

Electrons will connect with iotas that need aid introduce in the test produces Different signs that hold data around the test. SEM Investigation alongside EDAX may be a capable nondestructive testing apparatus for looking at pores conveyance micro structural properties for little partials under a optical magnifying instrument. Inasmuch as vitality dispersive beam dissection may be used to determine the creation for components exhibit in the example or should dissect material structure aspects. X-beams emitted by the example following striking it toward electron shaft chooses those kind from claiming component. In the range processing, no peaks were omitted constantly on components broke down picking normalized transforming choices.

Table 5.5 EDAX result of sample cured in LO environment under case-4 for 28

days and 178 days

Fig. 5.29 SEM and EDAX images of sample cured in LO environment under

case-4 for 28 days and 178 days 5.9 X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis Those X-beam diffraction (XRD) may be used to recognizing those minerals and also other crystalline materials. Those XRD might gatherings give supplemental majority of the data with help fundamental data. The X-beam diffraction (XRD) dissection will be a powerful device on focus those silica period calcite stage of the powdered cement specimens.

In this experiment, a example may be put under those focus from claiming supplies and enlightened with An shaft for x-beams. Those X-beam tube with a pillar for x-beams and identifier moves in a synchronized movement. Those sign returning starting with the test is recorded graphed, the place peaks are watched identified with the nuclear structure of the example. [Most materials committed up from claiming a significant number little crystals in sand with respect toa vacation spot every for these crystals will be created about general plan for iotas also every molecule may be made of core encompassed Toward a cloud from claiming electrons. x-beams would secondary vitality light with a rehashing decimal period known as those

(11)

82 wavelength of an X-beam it may be

comparable of the separation between iotas on a Precious stone. An extraordinary obstruction impact known as diffraction camwood be used to measure the separation the middle of the iotas.

Whether the waves would over arrangement the sign may be amplified this may be known as valuable induction.

In the waves would crazy of arrangement those indicator is wrecked this may be known as ruinous obstruction. The point when an X-beam encounters an particle its vitality will be Consumed by those electrons. Electrons possess uncommon vitality states around a molecule. Since this is not enough vitality to those electron to be discharged those vitality must a chance to be readmitted in the manifestation of a new x-ray, this transform will be known as versatile diffusing.

Fig. 5.30 XRD Analysis of sample cured in AW environment under case-4 for 28

days and 178 days 6. CONCLUSIONS

In the available study, the conduct for cement presented to diverse situations might have been mulled over. Those study serves clinched alongside finer Comprehension of the impact of obtrusive situations around Portland slag bond cement. Conclusions of the test effects gotten starting with those current consider would provided for beneath.

REFERENCES

1. Aghaeipour, A., and Madhkhan, M. (2017).

“Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) on RCCP durability.”

Construction and Building Materials, 141, 533–541.

2. Aguiar, J. B., Camões, A., and Moreira, P. M.

(2010). “Performance of Concrete in Aggressive Environment.” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2(1), 21–25.

3. Alhozaimy, A., Hussain, R. R., Al-Zaid, R., and Al-Negheimish, A. (2012). “Coupled effect of ambient high relative humidity and varying temperature marine environment on corrosion of reinforced concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Elsevier Ltd, 28(1), 670–679.

4. Almusallam, A. A. (2001). “Effect of environmental conditions on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete.” 23(2001), 353–

361.

5. Aveldaño, R. R., and Ortega, N. F. (2011).

“Characterization of concrete cracking due to corrosion of reinforcements in different environments.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), 630–637.

6. Babaee, M., and Castel, A. (2018). “Chloride diffusivity, chloride threshold, and corrosion initiation in reinforced alkali-activated mortars: Role of calcium, alkali, and silicate content.” Cement and Concrete Research, 111(May), 56–71.

7. Bader, M. A. (2003). “Performance of concrete in a coastal environment.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(4-5 SPEC), 539–548.

8. Bassuoni, M. T., and Nehdi, M. L. (2009).

“Durability of self-consolidating concrete to sulfate attack under combined cyclic environments and flexural loading.” Cement and Concrete Research, 39(3), 206–226.

9. Bellmann, F., Erfurt, W., and Ludwig, H. M.

(2012). “Field performance of concrete exposed to sulphate and low pH conditions from natural and industrial sources.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(1), 86–93.

10. Boa, A. R., and Topu, L. B. (2012). “Influence of fly ash on corrosion resistance and chloride ion permeability of concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 31, 258–264.

11. Boubekeur, T., Boulekbache, B., Aoudjane, K., Ezziane, K., and Kadri, E. H. (2019).

“Prediction of the durability performance of ternary cement containing limestone powder and ground granulated blast furnace slag.”

Construction and Building Materials, 209, 215– 221.

12. Boubekeur, T., Ezziane, K., and Kadri, E. H.

(2017). “Quantification and analysis of heat hydration of blended cement at different temperature.” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Taylor & Francis, 31(24), 2741–2756.

13. Castro, P., De Rincon, O. T., and Pazini, E. J.

(2001). “Interpretation of chloride profiles from concrete exposed to tropical marine environments.” Cement and Concrete Research, 31(4), 529–537.

14. Chalee, W., Ausapanit, P., and Jaturapitakkul, C. (2010). “Utilization of fly ash concrete

15. in marine environment for long term design life analysis.” Materials and Design, 31(3), 1242–1249.

16. Chalee, W., Teekavanit, M., Kiattikomol, K., Siripanichgorn, A., and Jaturapitakkul, C.

(2007). “Effect of W/C ratio on covering depth of fly ash concrete in marine environment.”

Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), 965–971.

17. Cheah, C. B., Tan, L. E., and Ramli, M.

(2019). “The engineering properties and microstructure of sodium carbonate activated

(12)

83 fly ash/ slag blended mortars with silica

fume.” Composites Part B: Engineering, 160, 558–572.

18. Chen, F., Gao, J., Qi, B., and Shen, D.

(2017a). “Deterioration mechanism of plain and blended cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 154, 849–856.

19. Chen, R., Yang, K., Qiu, X., Zeng, X., Wang, P., Xu, J., and Chen, J. (2017b). “Degradation mechanism of CA mortar in CRTS I slab ballastless railway track in the Southwest acid rain region of China – Materials analysis.” Construction and Building Materials, 149, 921– 933.

20. Criado, M., Bernal, S. A., Garcia-Triñanes, P., and Provis, J. L. (2018). “Influence of slag composition on the stability of steel in alkali- activated cementitious materials.” Journal of Materials Science, 53(7), 5016–5035.

21. Dhapekar, N. K., Majumdar, A. S., and Gupta, P. K. (2015). “Study of phase composition of Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete using X-Ray Diffraction.”

International Journal of Scientific &

Engineering Research, 6(11), 433–440.

22. Djelal, C., Long, M., Haddi, A., and Szulc, J.

(2020). “Effect of marine environment on the behaviour of concrete structures reinforced by composite materials.” Mechanics and Industry, 21(4).

23. Dong, S., Zhao, B., Lin, C., Du, R., Hu, R., and Zhang, G. X. (2012). “Corrosion behavior of epoxy/zinc duplex coated rebar embedded in concrete in ocean environment.”

24. El-Hawary, M., Al-Khaiat, H., and Fereig, S.

(1998). “Effect of sea water on epoxyrepaired concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 20(1), 41–52.

25. El-Razek, M. M. A., and Abo-El-Enein, S. A.

(1999). “Moisture performance through fresh concrete at different environmental conditions.” Cement and Concrete Research, 29(11), 1819–1825.

26. Fazli, H., Yassin, A. Y. M., Shafiq, N., and Teo, W. (2018). “Pull-off testing as an interfacial bond strength assessment of CFRP-concrete interface exposed to a marine environment.” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 84(May), 335–342.

27. Girardi, F., Vaona, W., and Di Maggio, R.

(2010). “Resistance of different types of concretes to cyclic sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate attack.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(8), 595–602.

28. Giri Prasad, G., Seshagirirao, M. V, Ramarao, G. V, and Ramprasad, A. V. (2009).

“Assessment of self compacting concrte immerced in acidic solutions.” ACSGE-2009, Oct 25-27, BITS Pilani, India ASSESSMENT, 1–

10.

29. Hager, I., Tracz, T., Choińska, M., and Mróz, K. (2019). “Effect of cement type on the mechanical behavior and permeability of concrete subjected to high temperatures.”

Materials, 12(18).

30. Horszczaruk, E., Sikora, P., Cendrowski, K., and Mijowska, E. (2017). “The effect of elevated temperature on the properties of cement mortars containing nanosilica and

heavyweight aggregates.” Construction and Building Materials, 137, 420–431.

31. Huang, P., Bao, Y., and Yao, Y. (2005).

“Influence of HCl corrosion on the mechanical properties of concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 35(3), 584–589.

32. Huo, R., Li, S., and Ding, Y. (2018).

“Experimental Study on Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Mortar Subjected to Acid Corrosion.” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018.

33. Ishwarya, G., Singh, B., Deshwal, S., and Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2019). “Effect of sodium carbonate/sodium silicate activator on the rheology, geopolymerization and strength of fly ash/slag geopolymer pastes.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 97, 226–238.

34. Jakobsen, U. H., De Weerdt, K., and Geiker, M. R. (2016). “Elemental zonation in marine concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 85, 12–27.

35. Jayakumar, S., and Saravanane, R. (2010).

“Biodeterioration of coastal concrete structures by Macro algae - Chaetomorpha antennina.” Materials Research, 12(4), 465–

472.

36. Jiang, J., and Yuan, Y. (2012). “Prediction model for the time-varying corrosion rate of rebar based on micro-environment in concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 625–632.

37. Jiang, L., Huang, G., Xu, J., Zhu, Y., and Mo, L. (2012). “Influence of chloride salt type on threshold level of reinforcement corrosion in simulated concrete pore solutions.”

Construction and Building Materials, 30, 516–

521.

38. Kakooei, S., Akil, H. M., Dolati, A., and Rouhi, J. (2012). “The corrosion investigation of rebar embedded in the fibers reinforced concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 564–570.

39. Karakurt, C., and Topu, L. B. (2012). “Effect of blended cements with natural zeolite and industrial by-products on rebar corrosion and high temperature resistance of concrete.”

911.

40. Kockal, N. U., and Turker, F. (2007). “Effect of environmental conditions on the properties of concretes with different cement types.”

41. Kubo, J., Tanaka, Y., Page, C. L., and Page, M. M. (2013). “Application of electrochemical organic corrosion inhibitor injection to a carbonated reinforced concrete railway viaduct.” Construction and Building Materials, 39, 2–8.

42. Kumar, S. (2000). “Influence of water quality on the strength of plain and blended cement concretes in marine environments.” Cement and Concrete Research, 30(3), 345–350.

43. Li, F., Yuan, Y., and Li, C. Q. (2011).

“Corrosion propagation of prestressing steel strands in concrete subject to chloride attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(10), 3878– 3885.

44. Lublóy, É., Kopecskó, K., Balázs, G. L., Restás, Á., and Szilágyi, I. M. (2017).

“Improved fire resistance by using Portland- pozzolana or Portland-fly ash cements.”

(13)

84 Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,

Springer Netherlands, 129(2), 925–936.

45. Malheiro, R., Meira, G., Lima, M., and Perazzo, N. (2011). “Influence of mortar rendering on chloride penetration into concrete structures.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(2), 233–239.

46. Manjunath, N. K., C, L. K. B., Annapurna, B.

P., Jogi, P. K., Engg, C., and Robe, B. (2017).

“Effect of Effective Porosity and Saturated Water Absorption on Rice Concrete, Husk Ashfiltered Sand Self-compacting.”

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET), 4(3), 1218–1225.

47. Mastali, M., Kinnunen, P., Dalvand, A., Mohammadi Firouz, R., and Illikainen, M.

(2018). “Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders – A critical review.” Construction and Building Materials, 190, 533–550.

48. Melchers, R. E., Li, C. Q., and Lawanwisut, W. (2008). “Probabilistic modeling of structural deterioration of reinforced concrete beams under saline environment corrosion.”

Structural Safety, 30(5), 447–460.

49. Midhun, M. S., Gunneswara Rao, T. D., and Chaitanya Srikrishna, T. (2018). “Mechanical and fracture properties of glass fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete.” Advances in Concrete Construction, 6(1), 29–45.

50. Monteny, J., Vincke, E., Beeldens, A., De Belie, N., Taerwe, L., Van Gemert, D., and Verstraete, W. (2000). “Chemical, microbiological, and in situ test methods for biogenic sulfuric acid corrosion of concrete.”

Cement and Concrete Research, 30(4), 623–

634.

51. Muralidharan, S., Vedalakshmi, R., Saraswathi, V., Joseph, J., and Palaniswamy, N. (2005). “Studies on the aspects of chloride ion determination in different types of concrete under macro-cell corrosion conditions.” Building and Environment, 40(9), 1275–1281.

52. Al Mutlaq, F. M., and Page, C. L. (2013).

“Effects of electric arc furnace dust on susceptibility of steel to corrosion in chloride- contaminated concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 39, 60–64.

53. O’Connell, M., McNally, C., and Richardson, M. G. (2012). “Performance of concrete incorporating GGBS in aggressive wastewater environments.” Construction and Building Materials, 27(1), 368–374.

54. Olivia, M., Pradana, T., and Sitompul, I. R.

(2017). “Properties of Plain and Blended Cement Concrete Immersed in Acidic Peat Water Canal.” Procedia Engineering, 171, 557–563.

55. Pack, S. W., Jung, M. S., Song, H. W., Kim, S.

H., and Ann, K. Y. (2010). “Prediction of time dependent chloride transport in concrete structures exposed to a marine environment.”

Cement and Concrete Research, 40(2), 302–

312.

56. Parande, A. K., Babu, B. R., Pandi, K., Karthikeyan, M. S., and Palaniswamy, N.

(2011). “Environmental effects on concrete using Ordinary and Pozzolana Portland cementParande, A. K. Babu, B. Ramesh Pandi, K. Karthikeyan, M. S. Palaniswamy, N.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 288–297.

57. Penttala, V., and Al-Neshawy, F. (2002).

“Stress and strain state of concrete during freezing and thawing cycles.” Cement and Concrete Research, 32(9), 1407–1420.

58. Pilehvar, S., Szczotok, A. M., Rodríguez, J. F., Valentini, L., Lanzón, M., Pamies, R., and Kjøniksen, A. L. (2019). “Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of geopolymer concrete and Portland cement concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials.” Construction and Building Materials, The Authors, 200, 94–

103.

59. Plusquellec, G., Geiker, M. R., Lindgård, J., Duchesne, J., Fournier, B., and De Weerdt, K. (2017). “Determination of the pH and the free alkali metal content in the pore solution of concrete: Review and experimental comparison.” Cement and Concrete Research, 96, 13– 26.

60. Pu, L., and Unluer, C. (2018). “Durability of carbonated MgO concrete containing fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag.”

Construction and Building Materials, 192, 403– 415.

61. Raheem, A. A., Soyingbe, A. A., and Emenike, A. J. (2013). “Effect of Curing Methods on Density and Compressive Strength of Concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 3(4), 55–64.

62. Ranganthan, A., and R Maalthy. (2009).

“Durability of alkali activated geopolymer concrete against sulphuric acid attack.”

ACSGE-2009, Oct 25-27, BITS Pilani, India, 1–

8.

63. Rao, K. J., Keerthi, K., and Vasam, S. (2018).

“Acid resistance of quaternary blended recycled aggregate concrete.” Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8(January), 423– 433.

64. Ribeiro, D. V., Labrincha, J. A., and Morelli, M. R. (2012). “Effect of the addition of red mud on the corrosion parameters of reinforced concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 42(1), 124–133.

65. Santhanam, M., and Otieno, M. (2016).

“Deterioration of concrete in the marine environment.” Marine Concrete Structures, 1, 137–149.

66. Seo, J. H., Park, S. M., and Lee, H. K. (2018).

“Evolution of the binder gel in carbonationcured Portland cement in an acidic medium.” Cement and Concrete Research, 109(March), 81–89.

67. Shi, J. jie, and Ming, J. (2017a). “Influence of mill scale and rust layer on the corrosion resistance of low-alloy steel in simulated concrete pore solution.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 24(1), 64–74.

68. Shi, J. jie, Ming, J., and Liu, X. (2017).

“Pitting corrosion resistance of a novel duplex alloy steel in alkali-activated slag extract in the presence of chloride ions.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 24(10), 1134–1144.

69. Shi, J., and Ming, J. (2017b). “Influence of defects at the steel-mortar interface on the corrosion behavior of steel.” Construction and Building Materials, 136, 118–125.

70. Shi, J., Ming, J., and Sun, W. (2018).

“Electrochemical behaviour of a novel alloy

(14)

85 steel in alkali-activated slag mortars.” Cement

and Concrete Composites, 92(May), 110–124.

71. Shi, X., Xie, N., Fortune, K., and Gong, J.

(2012). “Durability of steel reinforced concrete in chloride environments: An overview.”

138.

72. Somna, R., Jaturapitakkul, C., and Amde, A.

M. (2012). “Effect of ground fly ash and ground bagasse ash on the durability of recycled aggregate concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(7), 848–854.

73. Sotiriadis, K., Nikolopoulou, E., and Tsivilis, S. (2012). “Sulfate resistance of limestone cement concrete exposed to combined chloride and sulfate environment at low temperature.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(8), 903–910.

74. Stewart, M. G., Wang, X., and Nguyen, M. N.

(2012). “Climate change adaptation for corrosion control of concrete infrastructure.”

Structural Safety, 35, 29–39.

75. Tae, S. H. (2012). “Corrosion inhibition of steel in concrete with natural inorganic minerals in corrosive environments due to chloride attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 270–280.

76. Tamimi, A. K., Abdalla, J. A., and Sakka, Z. I.

(2008). “Prediction of long term chloride diffusion of concrete in harsh environment.”

77. Tang, Y. M., Miao, Y. F., Zuo, Y., Zhang, G.

D., and Wang, C. L. (2012). “Corrosion behavior of steel in simulated concrete pore solutions treated with calcium silicate hydrates.” Construction and Building Materials, 30, 252–256.

78. Tengli, S. K., and Kalpana, M. S. (2009).

“Effect of variation in concentration of alkaline solutions on the behaviour of geopolymer concrete.” ACSGE-2009, Oct 25- 27, BITS Pilani, India.

79. Tennakoon, C., Shayan, A., Sanjayan, J. G., and Xu, A. (2017). “Chloride ingress and steel corrosion in geopolymer concrete based on long term tests.” Materials and Design, 116, 287–299.

80. Thunuguntla, C. S., and Gunneswara Rao, T.

D. (2018a). “Effect of mix design parameters on mechanical and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 193, 173–188.

81. Thunuguntla, C. S., and Gunneswara Rao, T.

D. (2018b). “Appraisal on Strength Characteristics of Alkali-Activated GGBFS with Low Concentrations of Sodium Hydroxide.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, Springer International Publishing, 42(3), 231–

243.

82. Venkatesan, P., Palaniswamy, N., and Rajagopal, K. (2006). “Corrosion performance of coated reinforcing bars embedded in concrete and exposed to natural marine environment.” Progress in Organic Coatings, 56(1), 8–12.

83. Venu, M., and Gunneswara Rao, T. D. (2017).

“Tie-confinement aspects of fly ash-GGBS based geopolymer concrete short columns.”

Construction and Building Materials, 151, 28–

35.

84. Venu, M., Padmavathi, V., and Rao, P. N.

(2009). “Effect of admixtures in concrete mix design.” ACSGE-2009, Oct 25-27, BITS Pilani, India EFFECT.

85. Vipulanandan, C., and Liu, J. (2005).

“Performance of polyurethane-coated concrete in sewer environment.” Cement and Concrete Research, 35(9), 1754–1763.

86. Vlahovic, M. M., Martinovic, S. P., Boljanac, T. D., Jovanic, P. B., and Volkov-Husovic, T.

D. (2011). “Durability of sulfur concrete in various aggressive environments.”

87. Wang, J., Basheer, P. A. M., Nanukuttan, S.

V., Long, A. E., and Bai, Y. (2016). “Influence of service loading and the resulting micro- cracks on chloride resistance of concrete.”

66.

88. Wang, Q., Wang, D., and Chen, H. (2017a).

“The role of fly ash microsphere in the microstructure and macroscopic properties of high-strength concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 83, 125–137.

89. Wang, Y., Gong, X., and Wu, L. (2019).

“Prediction model of chloride diffusion in concrete considering the coupling effects of coarse aggregate and steel reinforcement exposed to marine tidal environment.”

57.

90. Wang, Y., Niu, D., and Song, Z. (2017b).

“Effect of acid rain erosion on steel fiber reinforced concrete.” Journal Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition, 32(1), 121–128.

91. Wang, Z., Zhu, Z., Sun, X., and Wang, X.

(2017c). “Deterioration of fracture toughness of concrete under acid rain environment.”

Engineering Failure Analysis, 77, 76–84.

92. Yang, D. Y., and Luo, J. J. (2012). “The damage of concrete under flexural loading and salt solution.” Construction and Building Materials, 36, 129–134.

93. Yazdi, M. A., Liebscher, M., Hempel, S., Yang, J., and Mechtcherine, V. (2018). “Correlation of microstructural and mechanical properties of geopolymers produced from fly ash and slag at room temperature.” Construction and Building Materials, 191, 330– 341.

94. Yildirim, H., Ilica, T., and Sengul, O. (2011).

“Effect of cement type on the resistance of concrete against chloride penetration.”

Construction and Building Materials, 25(3), 1282– 1288.

95. You, N., Shi, J., and Zhang, Y. (2020).

“Corrosion behaviour of low-carbon steel reinforcement in alkali-activated slag-steel slag and Portland cement-based mortars under simulated marine environment.”

Corrosion Science, 175, 108874.

96. Zemri, C., and Bachir Bouiadjra, M. (2020).

“Comparison between physical–mechanical properties of mortar made with Portland cement (CEMI) and slag cement (CEMIII) subjected to elevated temperature.” Case Studies in Construction Materials, 12, e00339.

97. Zhang, M., Chen, J., Lv, Y., Wang, D., and Ye, J. (2013). “Study on the expansion of concrete under attack of sulfate and sulfate-