361 RECENT RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY ON PRODUCTION BASED INNOVATION FOR LINEAR CONSTRUCTION FOR HIGHWAY SYSTEM: A REVIEW
Anand Mangal Sen
Research Scholar, Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Eklavya University, Damoh
Mr. Pankaj Agrawal
Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Eklavya University, Damoh Abstract - Development industry assumes a significant part in the financial improvement of a country. Exchange and trade in any nation have consistently relied upon the development business to expeditiously convey the foundation offices. Albeit each perspective in development industry is huge, arranging and booking of development projects is a basic viewpoint which can decide the situation with the venture well ahead of time. Fitting and top to bottom preparation of development projects is required on the off chance that defers in execution are to be stayed away from. Streets and expressways are significant parts of framework for any country. They help in transportation of men and material across the length and expansiveness as and when required. Arranging and planning of thruway development projects have been generally finished with Bar graphs, Critical way technique (CPM) in view of time dispensed for its exercises. For ventures, for example, parkways, these strategies don't give reasonable data and have been viewed as lacking for booking because of the idea of relationship of its exercises and execution style. These sorts of undertakings are called direct tasks which commonly comprise of exercises that range the whole length of the venture with back to back exercises advancing simultaneously keeping a cushion time and distance between one another.
1 GENERAL
Arranging and Scheduling of development projects has forever been a huge component deciding the effective finishing of a task because of rivalry, time, space and asset requirements, punishments and motivators that are dominating in this area. A very much arranged and carefully booked project perpetually turns into an effective task and contributes straightforwardly or by implication to the improvement of any country. Arranging and booking of development projects are being done with bar diagrams, achievement graphs and organization strategies and programming bundles in view of these methods. The utilization of booking devices helps the task chief to decide the leeway times accessible among exercises and basic ways for decision making throughout the undertaking. In view of this data, the scheduler (project director) further controls and reschedules the exercises in an undertaking in order to finish the venture ideally. The main rules in foreseeing the fruition or length of a venture is by characterizing the plausible creation paces of exercises engaged with request to give assets
properly to these exercises. The portion of length for every action depends on the creation pace of a group that is utilized to complete the action remembering the all out project time. Standard information books for examination of paces of exercises in development projects gives us rules which can be utilized to decide creation rates for different exercises of an undertaking.
1.1 Need for the Study
From the survey on booking strategies as of now utilized in the development business, it is plainly perceived that the similarity of the planning apparatus is absolutely founded on the kind of undertaking, its part errands and their creation rates and nature of connection between them. In this manner it becomes required for project booking to portray the truth of the development cycle in an undertaking. The direct booking technique (LSM) has been refered to on a few events as a promising device for use in planning street and comparative straight tasks. The productivity of direct planning to deal with creation paces of exercises and consolidate vulnerability
362 winning in project execution should be
researched thoroughly and a more sort subsequent to booking approach is to be created for straight development.
2 OVERVIEW
Productive task the executives is a consequence of consistent spotlight on the undertaking goals, information on the idea of exercises, insight in ideal utilization of assets, reasonableness of venture the board devices utilized, capability in the treatment of these devices, familiarity with time-cost relationship of exercises and the obligation to accomplish the targets. The normal booking strategies utilized for designing undertakings are bar outlines and organization techniques. The CPM, PERT and priority graph technique have been the most well known strategies in light of the organizations. Advancements in the organization based strategies have been integrated into different sorts of programming custom-made for this reason. Nonetheless, the prerequisite of the sort of booking device that will be embraced requests that it turns into the most flexible instrument for a specific venture and ought to be founded on the idea of exercises of the task.
2.1 Fundamentals and Extensions of Linear Scheduling
The starting points of direct booking strategies might be certify as an improvement over the bar graphs in which the distance factor has been moreover included to show the spatial relationship of exercises, plotting distances covered on the flat pivot and the span on the upward hub.
Mattila and Park (2003) have thought about the after effects of basic exercises of fundamental direct not entirely set in stone with the assistance of the straight booking strategy and the tedious planning technique (RSM).
Utilization of control focuses was proposed by them in the assurance of basic ways with RSM while controlling connections were utilized for a similar reason with LSM. The controlling ways for different kinds and relationship states of exercises were examined both with LSM and CPM and viewed as giving
comparative outcomes to the two strategies.
An irregular straight undertaking generator was created to deliver a gathering of 25 irregular direct ventures to break down and look at their basic ways by Kallantzis et al (2007). They likewise looked at the basic way of the kallantis lambropoulos dull venture model against the CPM network model.
2.2 Productivity in Projects
Float attributes of direct exercises have been investigated utilizing the straight planning technique (Harmelink 2001). For straight development, the idea of float is fairly not quite the same as the conventional booking strategies. As opposed to begin time and length being the primary credits of float, creation rate is more basic characteristic of a direct movement. This paper introduced the term rate float and its effect as it applies to the controlling action way characterized by the direct planning strategy .As such, for float to be significant for a straight action, it should be intelligent of the movement's significant trademark. Rate float catches this trademark and presents data to development organizers and chiefs in wording that are significant for direct ventures.
Vaziri et al (2007) created control arrangements as arranged asset designation to undertakings that catch the vulnerability of errand spans and the effect of undertaking terms on those asset distributions. They embraced asset multipliers and term multipliers to concentrate on the impact of assets on lengths. A calculation in this setting was created embracing recreation techniques to show up at an ostensible and an enhanced group size. The likelihood dispersion of lengths with a task of 21 exercises was dissected in light of their mean and standard deviation and the outcomes got for shifted group distributions have been made sense of concerning the variety in term and cost.
2.3 Simulation Tools
A concentrate on the likelihood circulation of real terms of exercises gathered from around 120 street projects found topographically all over India was
363 made by Arun and Rao (2003) for
anticipating street project lengths. Their review was centered around eleven vital exercises in expressway projects under different situations of vulnerability, for example, area factors and site explicit variables. The stochastic examination of the information gathered from these tasks showed that the terms of exercises in expressway projects in India constantly followed a log-calculated dissemination.
They recommended that these conveyances can be ascribed to the high vulnerability of lengths in non-industrial nations. They presumed that the likelihood dissemination consolidated in a recreation model can give a sensible gauge of venture length at an ideal certainty level.
Ming Lu and Abourizk (2000) presented the worked on CPM/PERT reenactment procedure in light of the traditional CPM method and reproduction to give elective arrangements in project the board for risk examination and survey other potential situations. They embraced the discrete occasion displaying approach in which the occasions take discrete states that change over the long run.
Contrasting a CPM network for seventeen exercises, their model required only 33%
of the factors as expected by the traditional CPM which gave gigantic reserve funds in time and PC memory space particularly for enormous scope projects with more number of exercises.
Likewise the expansion in likelihood of finishing the venture from 72% to 85 percent has additionally been exhibited by thinking about different circumstances.
A cycle model was created for estimating and dissecting the general venture efficiency (Hyun Lee 2003). The day to day amounts of work and info assets were recorded and approved for two metropolitan undertakings and one rustic venture with comparable extent of work yet situated in various regions .An efficiency cycle model was created to consolidate concurrent work movement efficiency into a worldwide efficiency an incentive for the task as awhole. Three variables influencing the general venture efficiency, for example, the variety of day to day project efficiency, the level of failure of development activities, problematic occasions that added to
misfortune in project efficiency were the critical contemplations in his work.
Project efficiency was determined by separating the complete day to day comparable work units by all out day to day worker hours to create these work units. Comparable work unit factors were created to secretive day to day measure of work with normal units into an identical unit of work with a typical unit.
2.4 Time and Cost Overruns
In examining time overwhelms of development projects in India, Iyer and Jha (2006) reasoned that two achievement variables and one disappointment factor; responsibility of venture members, proprietor's capability and struggle among project members contributed essentially in the upgrade of the exhibition of an undertaking.
Main drivers of postpones in development projects were characterized as circumstances and conditions in adequate detail that disregarded the crucial standards to permit restorative move to be made (Ellis and Randolph 2003). A posting of most normal main drivers classified under seven significant classifications, for example, strategic policies, methods, utilities, site conditions, arranging and planning, traffic the board and plan mistakes has been given. Albeit the overview for underlying driver of postponement from both public roadway organizations and constructors were recorded independently, it was viewed that as the majority of them were normal for the two sides.
Arun and Rao (2007) managed an imaginative Decision Support Tool that could foresee the length overwhelm cost overwhelm and exercises related with a particular defer in parkway development projects. Recreation models for term and cost overwhelm of the venture was created in view of the idea of postponement, exercises related with the deferral and delegated controllable and wild factors. In view of the assessment of senior venture implementers from 64 specialists and experts in parkway development area of India, the primary gamble factors were sorted in this work. The Knowledge Based Decision Support Tool (KBDST) was created to give a venture checking device
364 to assess the gamble related with the
postpones in the thruway development projects. KBDST was created in Java with the guide of reproduction models to produce a powerful information base for cost and span overwhelm for expressway development projects. The term and cost invade for the exercises impacted by the deferral was gotten as result from this model.
2.5 The Delphi Process
The Delphi cycle to be chosen for exploring project the board issues and issues has been introduced by Grisham (2009). It was presumed that the Delphi procedure is a subjective overview strategy that is appropriate for the examination of perplexing issues. The procedure doesn't offer the meticulousness of clinical testing or quantitative investigation, however gives a logical system that is appropriate to issues that require the bits of knowledge of a topic.
Uses of the Delphi method was recommended by directing four rounds of Delphi in recognizing restrictive models for choice of activities for worldwide undertaking arrangement of Serbian development organizations and to determine agreement in the weighting of utility elements in various global business sectors (Cekic 2004).
Zami and Lee (2009) contended Delphi as an exploration method with members of master board answering a progression of surveys to accomplish an agreement in distinguishing the variables impacting the boundless reception of balanced out earth development to address the minimal expense lodging emergency.
Skulmoski and Krahn (2007) recommended that the Delphi strategy is an adaptable exploration procedure appropriate when there is deficient information about a peculiarities and added that it isn't simply a quantitative technique, however functions admirably in subjective examination.
2.6 Inference
From the survey of prior works it is seen that few endeavors have been made to upgrade planning for street projects. The basics of the LSM strategy from its
underlying stage and later on the algorithmic methodology for assurance of basic ways and floats have shown promising advancements in the procedure. The strategy has been contrasted and CPM and other comparable devices to concentrate on the flexibility of the procedure by Chrzanowski and Johnston (1986) and Matilla and Park (2003). Yet, the degree of use of LSM in enormous parkway projects with dubious movement lengths should be read up for site level applications.
In this manner with these lacuna distinguished in thruway project booking, it is expected to characterize the creation rates in street projects in view of site rehearses and consequently foster a basic procedure to manage vulnerability in deciding street project terms. The plausible creation paces of straight exercises should be researched and an agreement is to be arrived at on these creation rates in order to show up at spans for explicit tasks with changed inputs (Grisham 2009).
3 FINDINGS
Street projects are special and should be booked with an alternate methodology because of the strategy for execution and nature of exercises. From the above study including plausible creation paces of direct exercises, the accompanying ends are drawn;
I. The boundaries controlling basic fragments of direct exercises in street projects give the fundamental data about the way of behaving of basic ways in street projects in light of different movement connections.
They are likewise instrumental in distinguishing the idea of basic portions in light of the creation paces of exercises. From Figure 5.3 and Table 5.4, it is seen that movement bituminous cement is absolutely basic between km 101 and km 106 of KTRP for 50 days fulfilling condition 4.2. Any remaining closure, begin or halfway straight exercises in the LSM conform to the situation pertinent to its status. Nonetheless, when the quantity of segments and subsections are expanded as in huge roadway projects, understanding of
365 data and observing advancement
turns out to be more perplexing.
II. A recreation model created in view of the likelihood circulation assists us with understanding the action terms in a street project and gives us a scope of plausible creation paces of direct exercises. For example, the creation rates got for clearing and grubbing from the model demonstrates a worth of 1.3 days/km to 26.90 days/km. The wide reach underway rates shows endless postpones that happen because of specific factors, for example, land securing, moving of utilities and so on. Moreover the creation paces of the relative multitude of exercises from the recreation model display wide varieties underway as the likelihood dispersion depends on spans of exercises in different kinds of street projects with no clearness as for aspects, teams and explanations behind delay.
To put it plainly, reproduction model can be utilized for deciding likely creation rates provided that likelihood dispersions are well defined for the kind of venture close by.
4 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The creation rate approach of booking straight development consolidating time gauge factors gives a fundamental stage in foreseeing street project terms. The review manages a ceaseless stretch of double carriageway development for given aspects under ordinary climate and geological circumstances. The review has been restricted to project spans just and doesn't think about monetary variables of creation.
5 SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDY
Aside from the concentrate in ordinary geology and atmospheric conditions, street development projects are taken up in different areas and situations. Hence, the work might be reached out for different classes of street development with creation rates characterized for explicit sorts of ventures. Additionally, further concentrate on the impact of variety underway on cost for every class of work will be helpful in offsetting work
progress with financial parts of development in street projects.
REFERENCES
1. Alexandros Kallantzis, John Soldatos and Sergios Lambropoulos, “Linear versus Network Scheduling: A Critical Path Comparison”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.124, No.3, pp.483-491, 2007.
2. Arun, C. and Nagabhushana Rao Bh.,
“Knowledge Based Decision Support Tool for Duration and Cost Overrun Analysis of Highway Construction Projects”, Journal of Civil Engineering, Institution of Engineers (India), pp 27–33, August 2007.
3. Arun, C. and Nagabhushana Rao Bh.,
“Probability Distribution Analysis of Activity Duration in Indian Highway Projects”, Proceedings of Ninth East Asia Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Bali, Indonesia, pp.164-174, 2003.
4. Barazza, G.A. and Bueno, R.A. “Probabilistic Control of Project Performance using Control Limit Curves”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.133, No.12, pp. 957-965, 2007.
5. Brenda McCabe, “Monte Carlo Simulation for Schedule Risks”, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, pp.1561- 1565, 2003.
6. Cekic Zoran, “Application of Delphi Method in Selection of International Construction Projects”, Management-The Magazine for the Theory and Practice of Management, Vol. 9, No.36, pp.47-56, 2004.
7. Chrzanowski, E.N. and Johnston, D.W.
“Application of Linear Scheduling”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.112, No.4, pp.476-491, 1986.
8. Cristiano Maio, Cliff Schexnayder, Kraig Knutson and Sandra Weber, “Probability Distribution Functions for Construction Simulation”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.
126, No.4, pp.285-292, 2000.
9. Eldon Jhoy and Ruwanapura, J.Y. “Situation Based Modeling for Construction Productivity”, Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, 2005.
10. Ellis, R.D. Jr. and Randolph Thomas, H. “The Root Causes of Delays in Highway Construction”, Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp 1-14, 2003.
11. Gunnar Lucko, „„Productivity Scheduling Method: Linear Schedule Analysis with Singularity Functions”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.135, No.4, pp.246-253, 2009.
12. Halphin, D.W. “CYCLONE – Method of Modelling Job Site Process”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp.489-499, 1971.
13. Handa, V.K. and Barcia, R.M. “Linear Scheduling using Optimal Control Theory”, Journal of Construction Engineering and
366 Management, ASCE, Vol.112, No.3, pp.387-
393, 1987.
14. Harmelink, D.J. “Linear Scheduling Model:
Float Characteristics”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.127, No.4, pp.255-260, 2001.
15. Harmelink, D.J. and Maria Andrea Bernal,
“Simulating Haul Durations for Linear Scheduling”, Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp.1607-1613, 1998.
16. Harmelink, D.J. and Rowings, J.E. “Linear Scheduling Model: Development of Controlling Activity Path”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.124, No.4, pp.263-268, 1998.
17. Hassanein, A. and Moselhi, O. “Planning and Scheduling Highway Construction”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.114, No.1, pp.638- 646, 2004.
18. Iannou, P.G and Martinez, J.C. “Project Scheduling using State based Probabilistic Decision Networks”, Proceedings of 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington DC, pp.1287-1295, 1998.
19. Indrasen Singh, “Planning and Management of National Highway Construction Work by Computer Simulation Approach”, Journal of Indian Roads Congress, pp.347-369, 2003 20. Internet www.amazon.com.
21. Internet www.ce.ufl.edu.
22. Internet www.indiabudget.nic.in.
23. Internet www.nhai.org.
24. Internet www.worldbank.org.
25. Ipsilandis, P.G. “Multi objective Linear Programmimg Model for Scheduling Linear Repetitive Projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.124, No.3, pp.417-424, 2007.
26. Iyer, K.C. and Jha, K.N. “Critical Factors Affecting Schedule Performance: Evidence from Indian Construction Projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.124, No.3, pp.871- 880, 2006.
27. Javier Fente, Cliff Schexnayder and Kraig Knutson, “Defining a Probability Distribution Function for Construction Simulation”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 126, No 3, pp. 234- 241, 2000.
28. Johnston, D.W. “Linear Scheduling Method for Highway Construction”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 247-261,1981.
29. Joy, P.K. “Handbook of Construction Management”, II Edition, Macmillan India Limited, New Delhi, 1991.
30. Joy, P.K. „„Total Project Management”, Macmillan India Limited, New Delhi, 1998.
31. Mattila, K.G. and Amy Park, „„Comparison of Linear scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.129, No.1, pp.56-64, 2003.
32. Mattila, K.G. and Dulcy Abraham, “Resource Leveling of Linear Schedules using Integer Linear Programming”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.124, No.3, pp.232-243, 1988.
33. Ming Lu and Abourizk, S.M. “Simplified CPM/PERT Simulation Model”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 3, pp. 219-226, 2000.
34. Ming Lu and Hoi Chang Lam, “Critical Path Scheduling under Resource Calendar Constraints”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.134, No.1, pp.25-31, 2008.
35. Ming Lu, “Simplified Discrete-Event Simulation Approach for Construction Simulation”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.
129, No. 5, pp.537-546, 2003.
36. Mohammad Sharif Zami and Angela Lee, “A Review of the Delphi Technique: To Understand the Factors Influencing Adoption of Stabilised Earth Construction in Low Cost Urban Housing”, The Built and Human Environment Review, Vol.2, pp.37-50, 2009.
37. Moselhi, O. and Hassanein, A. “Optimized Scheduling of Linear Projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.114, No.1, pp.664-672, 2003.
38. Reda, R.M. „„Repetitive Project Modelling (RPM)”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.116, No.2, pp.316-330, 1990.
39. “Report on Implementing Comprehensive Project Monitoring and Management Process and System and Report on Linking of project Monitoring system with Master plan”, Uttarpradesh State Roads Project, UP, India, 2008.
40. Russell, A. D. and Caselton, W.F. “Extensions to Linear Scheduling Optimisation”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.114, No.1, pp.36-52, 1988.
41. Seung Hyun Lee. “A Process Model for Controlling Project Productivity of Highway Construction Operations”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, 2003.
42. Sharma, R.N. “Project Construction Management of Large Highway Packages”, Journal of Indian Roads Congress, pp. 243- 268.
43. Shun-Shun Liu and Chang Jung Wang,
“Optimization Model for Resource Assignment Problems of Linear Construction Project”, Journal of Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 16, pp. 460-473, 2007.
44. Skulmoski, G.J. and Jennifer Krahn, „„The Delphi Method for Graduate Research”, Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 1-21, 2007.
45. Srilal Perara, “Resource Sharing in Linear Construction”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.109, No.1, pp.102-111, 1983.
46. Standard Data Book for Analysis of Rates, I Revision, Indian Roads Congress, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, India, 2003.
47. Thomas Grisham, “The Delphi Technique: A Method for Testing Complex and Multifaceted Topics”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 112- 130, 2009.
48. Thomas, H., Maloney, W., Horner, R., Smith, G., Handa, V., and Sanders, S. “Modern
367 Construction Labour Productivity”, Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.116, No.4, pp.705-726, 1990.
49. Vaziri, K., Carr, P.G. and Nozick, L. K.
„„Project Planning for Construction under Uncertainty with Limited Resources”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.133, No.4, pp.268-276.
50. Victoria Alexeeva, Gouthmi Padm and Cesar Queiroz, “Monitoring Road Works Contracts and Unit Costs for Enhanced Governanace in Sub Saharan Africa”, Transport papers, The World Bank Group, 2008.
51. Vohra, N.D. “Quantitative Techniques in Management”, II Edition, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2001.
52. Yamin, R. A. and Harmelink, D. J.
“Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model (LSM) and Critical Path Method (CPM)”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.127, No.5, pp.374-381, 2001.
53. Zhang, H., Tam, C., and Li, H. “Activity Object-Oriented Simulation Strategy for Modeling Construction Operations”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.19, No.3, pp.313-322, 2005.
54. Chao Shang, Fengqi You, “Data Analytics and Machine Learning for Smart Process Manufacturing: Recent Advances and Perspectives in the Big Data Era”, Engineering 5 (2019) 1010–1016.
55. G. Yogesh, Ch Hanumanth Rao, “A study on linear scheduling methods in road construction projects”, Materials Today:
Proceedings, 2021.
56. Sebastjan Meza, Alenka Mauko Pranjic, Rok Vezocnik, Igor Osmokrovic and Stanislav Lenart, “Digital Twins and Road Construction Using Secondary Raw Materials”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Volume 2021, Article ID 8833058, 12 pages.
57. Flávio Craveiro, José Pinto Duarte, Helena Bartolo, Paulo Jorge Bartolo, “Additive manufacturing as an enabling technology for digital construction: A perspective on Construction 4.0”, Automation in Construction 103 (2019) 251–267.
58. Adriana Santos, Elisabete F. Freitas, Susana Faria, Joel R. M. Oliveira and Ana Maria A. C.
Rocha, “Prediction of Friction Degradation in Highways with Linear Mixed Models”,
Coatings 2021, 11, 187.
https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020187.
59. Abolfazl Jaafari, Iman Pazhouhan and Pete Bettinger, “Machine Learning Modeling of Forest Road Construction Costs”, Forests
2021, 12, 1169.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091169.
60. Sanaz Tayefeh Hashemi, Omid Mahdi Ebadati, Harleen Kaur, “Cost estimation and prediction in construction projects: a systematic review on machine learning techniques”, SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1703 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452- 020-03497-1.
61. Yu-Sheng Kao, Kazumitsu Nawata and Chi- Yo Huang, “Systemic Functions Evaluation based Technological Innovation System for the Sustainability of IoT in the Manufacturing Industry”, Sustainability 2019, 11, 2342;
doi:10.3390/su11082342.
62. Mandy Wallace, Anita Meldrum, Slobodan Mickovski, Iain McNee, Derwyn Lear and Sam Flint, “Developing a Methodological Framework for Estimating Temporary Drainage Capacity to Inform Land Requirements for a Highway Construction Project in Scotland”, Sustainability 2020, 12, 5522; doi:10.3390/su12145522.
63. Cornelia Dobrescu, “Dynamic Response of the Newton Voigt–Kelvin Modelled Linear Viscoelastic Systems at Harmonic Actions”, Symmetry 2020, 12, 1571; doi:
10.3390/sym12091571.