• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Reimbursement of salary and payment for support services to non-resident neither royalty nor FTS: Distinguishes Delhi High Court’s Centrica decision

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Reimbursement of salary and payment for support services to non-resident neither royalty nor FTS: Distinguishes Delhi High Court’s Centrica decision"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Tax Insights

from India Tax & Regulatory Services

www.pwc.in

Reimbursement of salary and payment for support services to non-resident neither royalty nor FTS: Distinguishes Delhi High Court’s Centrica decision

August 5, 2019

In brief

Recently,1 the Pune bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) has held that reimbursement received by a non-resident company (taxpayer) towards salary cost of seconded expat from the Indian entity is not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Further, the Tribunal, while deciding on the taxability of payment received towards provision of Global Information Support services (support services), held that it does not constitute royalty/ FTS under the Act. It does not make available any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how to the Indian entity, and hence, it does not constitute FTS under Article 13(4) of the India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (tax treaty) when read with the Protocol to India-France tax treaty and Article 13(4) of the India-UK tax treaty.

In detail

Facts

 The taxpayer is a non- resident engaged in designing and building dashboards, door panels, floor coverings, sound proofing, insulation installations and other moulded plastic parts for passenger car interiors.

 The taxpayer had seconded an expatriate to the Indian entity for provision of services to the Indian entity. The expat was appointed as the CEO of the Indian entity.

1 ITA No. 784/PUN/2015

 During the year under consideration, the taxpayer received an amount, which inter alia, included payment towards reimbursement of salary cost (without any mark- up) of expatriate seconded to the Indian entity and payment towards support services from the Indian entity. It filed its return of income in India declaring

‘nil’ income.

 For reimbursement of salary cost of expatriate, the Tax Officer (TO) alleged that the taxpayer provided technical services

through its staff, i.e., seconded employee and treated the said receipt as FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.

 For payment towards support services, the TO treated the said receipts in the nature of royalty/ FTS under the Act.

Issues before the Tribunal

 Whether reimbursement of salary cost of seconded expatriate is taxable as FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act?

 Whether receipt towards

(2)

Tax Insights

2 pwc

support services is taxable as Royalty/ FTS under the Act?

Taxpayer’s contention

 For the reimbursement amount, the taxpayer contended that payment by the Indian entity was in the nature of reimbursement of expenses. The taxpayer only made payment of salary on behalf of the Indian entity, which is being recovered without any mark up, and hence, is not chargeable to tax.

 With regard to support services, the taxpayer contended that it provided assistance in various facets of business operations such as management, marketing, accounting and finance, human resources and

rendered IT support services, which do not make available any technical knowledge, experience, skill or know- how, etc., to the Indian entity, and hence, it does not

constitute FTS under Article 13 of the India-France tax treaty read with para 7 of the Protocol to the India-France tax treaty.

Revenue’s contention

 On the issue of expatriate salary cost reimbursement, the Revenue contended that the taxpayer rendered managerial, consultancy or technical services to the Indian entity, and hence, the payment represents FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Revenue further relied on the decision of the Delhi High Court (HC) in the case of Centrica India Offshore Private Limited2.

 For payment towards support services, the Revenue

contended that such payment

2 Centrica India Offshore Private Limited v.

CIT [2014] 364 ITR 336 (Delhi)

was in the nature of royalty/

FTS under the Act.

Tribunal’s ruling

Reimbursement of salary cost

 The Tribunal held that the amount under dispute cannot be assessed as FTS in view of the exception in the definition of FTS under Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) of the Act which states that an amount shall not be considered as FTS if the consideration is income of the recipient chargeable under the head

“salaries.” In the present case, the salary of expatriate (including the salary cost reimbursed by the Indian entity to the taxpayer) was assessed to tax under the head “salaries.”

 The word “recipient” in the provision should be the real recipient and chargeability has to be only in his hands. In the present case, the real recipient is the expatriate because of the employer- employee relationship with the Indian entity, and the taxpayer had no role to play in the rendition of services by the expatriate to the Indian entity.

 The Tribunal further distinguished the Revenue’s reliance on the Delhi HC’s decision in the case of Centrica India Offshore Private Limited2. The Tribunal observed that in the case of Centrica India

Offshore Private Limited2, the HC had held that payment to the foreign entity was in the nature of FTS and the money paid by the Indian entity accrued to the overseas entity which may or may not apply for payment to secondees.

The Tribunal noted that in

the present case the money accrued to the expatriate in his own independent right by the virtue of his employment.

 Therefore, it held that the amount received by the taxpayer was in the nature of reimbursement and was not covered within the purview of FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.

Receipt towards support services

 The Tribunal noted that the taxpayer provided IT support services and managerial services to the Indian entity.

The Tribunal held that the services rendered by the taxpayer did not involve any imparting of information concerning technical, industrial or commercial knowledge to the Indian entity. A mere rendering of services did not constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act.

 Further, it noted that the services under consideration are technical and managerial services, and hence, covered by the definition of FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.

However, the Tribunal noted that rendition of managerial services cannot be brought within the scope of FTS under Article 13(4) of the India- France tax treaty read with para 7 of the Protocol to the India-France tax treaty and Article 13(4) of the India-UK tax treaty. The technical services did not make available any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, etc., to the Indian entity, and hence, are not taxable under Article 13 of the India-France tax treaty read in conjunction with the India- UK tax treaty.

(3)

Tax Insights

3 pwc

The takeaways

 The litigation around taxability of reimbursement of salary cost to an overseas entity is very common with several judicial precedents for and against. This is a

welcome ruling for taxpayers to support the position that reimbursement of salary cost to overseas affiliate entities

for seconded expatriates working under the supervision, control and direction of the Indian entity, would not constitute FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act.

 It also aids in distinguishing the Centrica India Offshore Private Limited decision2 on the issue of taxability of

reimbursement as FTS.

Further, the Tribunal’s observation with regard to real recipient vis-à-vis literal recipient in the definition of FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act is noteworthy.

Let’s talk

For a deeper discussion of how this issue might affect your business, please contact your local PwC advisor

(4)

Tax Insights

For private circulation only

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwCPL, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. Without prior permission of PwCPL, this publication may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents.

© 2019 PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited liability company in India having Corporate Identity Number or CIN : U74140WB1983PTC036093), which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL), each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.

About PwC

At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 158 countries with over 250,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services.

Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.

In India, PwC has offices in these cities: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune and Raipur. For more information about PwC India’s service offerings, visit www.pwc.in

PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

© 2019 PwC. All rights reserved

Follow us on:

Our Offices

Ahmedabad Bengaluru Chennai

1701, 17th Floor, Shapath V, Opp. Karnavati Club, S G Highway,

Ahmedabad – 380051 Gujarat

+91-79 3091 7000

6th Floor

Millenia Tower ‘D’

1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru – 560 008 Karnataka

+91-80 4079 7000

8th Floor

Prestige Palladium Bayan 129-140 Greams Road Chennai – 600 006 Tamil Nadu

+91 44 4228 5000

Hyderabad Kolkata Mumbai

Plot no. 77/A, 8-2-624/A/1, 4th Floor, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad – 500034,

Telangana

+91-40 44246000

56 & 57, Block DN.

Ground Floor, A- Wing Sector - V, Salt Lake Kolkata - 700 091 West Bengal

+91-033 2357 9101/

4400 1111

PwC House Plot No. 18A,

Guru Nanak Road(Station Road), Bandra (West), Mumbai – 400 050 Maharashtra

+91-22 6689 1000

Gurgaon Pune For more information

Building No. 10, Tower - C 17th & 18th Floor,

DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon – 122002 Haryana

+91-124 330 6000

7th Floor, Tower A - Wing 1, Business Bay, Airport Road, Yerwada, Pune – 411 006 Maharashtra

+91-20 4100 4444

Contact us at

[email protected]

Referensi

Dokumen terkait