• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Sharing insights

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Sharing insights"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1

Fee towards IT support services not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services under the India-Australia tax treaty In brief

In the recent case of Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd.1, the Pune Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that the receipts for rendering information technology (IT) support services to group companies in India are not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services (FTS) as per the provisions of Article 12 of the India-Australia Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (the tax treaty).

Facts

• The appellant, Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. (the company or the assessee), is a tax resident of Australia.

1 Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. v. DDIT [TS-46-ITAT-2013(Pune)]

• The assessee acts as a global IT support centre for the Asia-Pacific region and is responsible for providing the necessary IT support services for group companies in the Asia-Pacific region. The IT support is in the nature of helpdesk support, user administration, data storage, data processing and maintenance and control of the global IT infrastructure.

• The assessee received INR 10.77 million during financial year (FY) 2006-07, from its Indian associated enterprises for rendering such IT support services.

The appellant filed its return of income for FY 2006-07 declaring nil income.

• The return of income was selected for scrutiny. The assessing officer (AO) passed a draft assessment order taxing the IT support fee of INR 10.77 million as FTS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and Clause 3(g) of Article 12 of the tax treaty.

www.pwc.in

Sharing insights

News Alert

13 February 2013

(2)

PwC News Alert February 2013

2

• The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) confirmed the draft order and consequently a tax demand was raised.

• The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal.

Issue

• Whether the IT support fee is taxable as royalty or FTS in India under Article 12 of the tax treaty.

Assessee’s contentions

• As per Clause 3(g) of Article 12 of the tax treaty, services rendered should make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how to the recipient of the service to qualify as FTS. As IT support services do not satisfy the ‘make available’ test, they are not taxable in India.

• There is a difference between ‘rendering the services’ and ‘to make available the services’. The former means services are rendered to give end results without imparting any technical know-how or knowledge. In case of the latter, the recipient of the services is enabled to make use of the technology.

• The assessee placed reliance on the following case laws to interpret the term

‘make available’:

- De Beers India Minerals (P) Ltd.2 - Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd.3

• The assessee is rendering IT support services and not imparting any technical know-how or knowledge. The agreement between the assessee and the recipient companies needs to be read holistically and none of the clauses

2 CIT & ITO v. De Beers India Minerals (P) Ltd. [2012] 72 DTR 82 (Karnataka)

3 DIT v. Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. [2012] 346 ITR 504 (Delhi)

suggest that technical knowledge has been made available to the recipient companies.

Revenue’s contentions

The revenue authorities laid emphasis on the recitals of the agreement between the assessee and the group companies, wherein it was mentioned that the assessee is willing to transfer knowledge as per the agreement. The revenue authorities argued that the assessee had not only rendered IT support services but also transferred the knowledge of the said services to the recipient party.

• The receipts are covered under provisions of royalty or FTS under the Act and the Clause 3(g) of Article 12 of the tax treaty.

Tribunal ruling

• The services consist of IT helpdesk support, back-up related services and networking-related services. By providing these services, the assessee has not imparted any technical know-how, skill, process or transferred technical plan or design.

• The operating clauses of the agreement do not suggest that the assessee has made available the required technical know-how to the recipient companies.

• The term ‘make available’ in the tax treaty is used in the context of supplying or transferring technical knowledge or technology to another. The technology will be considered as made available when the person receiving the services is able to apply the technology without further assistance from service provider.

For interpreting the term ‘make available’, the Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

(above).

• The assessee only provided back-up services and IT support services for solving the IT related problems of its Indian affiliates. Hence, services rendered by the assessee, although in the nature of technical services as per

(3)

PwC News Alert February 2013

3 section 9(1)(vii) of the Act, are not covered by Clause 3(g) under Article 12 of

the tax treaty.

Conclusion

Of late, the revenue authorities have been trying to tax all IT related receipts (including software and IT support payments) under royalty or FTS, especially after the retrospective amendments in the Act.

The Tribunal has discussed the concept of ‘make available’ used in tax treaties and applied the same in the context of IT support services. This ruling discusses the nature of IT support services at length and provides a good direction as to why the

‘make available’ test may not be satisfied in the case of IT support services.

This is a welcome ruling and is likely to provide a good defence to non-resident assessees grappling with the issue of taxability of similar IT support fee receipts, especially where the non-resident is from a tax jurisdiction with which India has signed a tax treaty having similar provisions (‘make available clause’) vis-à-vis tax incidence of royalty or FTS.

(4)

PwC News Alert February 2013

4

About PwC India

PwC* helps organisations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We are a network of firms in 158 countries with more than 180,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax and advisory services.

PwC India refers to the network of PwC firms in India, having offices in: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune. For more information about PwC India's service offerings, please visit www.pwc.in.

*PwC refers to PwC India and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.com/in.

Our offices

For private circulation only Ahmedabad

President Plaza, 1st Floor Plot No 36 Opp Muktidham Derasar

Thaltej Cross Road, SG Highway Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380054 Phone +91-79 3091 7000

Bangalore

6th Floor, Millenia Tower 'D' 1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bangalore 560 008 Phone +91-80 4079 7000

Chennai

8th Floor, Prestige Palladium Bayan 129-140 Greams Road,

Chennai 600 006, India

Hyderabad

#8-2-293/82/A/113A Road no. 36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 034, Andhra Pradesh

Phone +91-40 6624 6600

Kolkata

56 & 57, Block DN.

Ground Floor, A- Wing Sector - V, Salt Lake.

Kolkata - 700 091, West Bengal, India Telephone: +91-033 - 2357 9101/4400 1111 Fax: (91) 033 - 2357 2754

Mumbai

PwC House, Plot No. 18A, Guru Nanak Road - (Station Road), Bandra (West), Mumbai - 400 050 Phone +91-22 6689 1000

Gurgaon

Building No. 10, Tower - C 17th & 18th Floor, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon Haryana -122002 Phone : +91-124 330 6000

Pune

GF-02, Tower C, Panchshil Tech Park, Don Bosco School Road, Yerwada, Pune - 411 006 Phone +91-20 4100 4444

For more information contact us at, [email protected]

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwCPL, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. Without prior permission of PwCPL, this publication may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents.

©2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. "PwC", a registered trademark, refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited company in India) or, as the context requires, other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tax Insights 5 August 2023 Receipts from cloud-computing services not taxable as royalty, FTS or FIS as per the India-USA DTAA – Delhi bench of the Tribunal In brief The Delhi

1 No time limit for passing withholding tax orders In brief In a recent decision in the case of Bhura Exports Ltd.1 “the assessee”, the Calcutta High Court held that there is no

Ltd.1 the “assessee” or the “company”, the Supreme Court held that a deduction under section 80HHE for the purpose of computing Minimum Alternate Tax “MAT” on adjusted book profit under

1 No capital gains tax on transfer of shares held in Indian companies : Supreme Court decision in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan upheld Background • In the case of Dynamic India

1 Itemised sale of assets, in substance, held to be a slump sale taxable under section 50-B In brief In the recent case of Mahindra Engineering & Chemical Products Ltd.1 the

1 Payment for satellite up-linking and telecasting programmes not royalty or fees for technical services In brief In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate