Solution for MIEG (Part I) Makeup Test, Winter Term, 2015
Ans1
Lets say firms from 1 to n are followers and (n+ 1)th firm is a leader, index byL.
This a two stage game. First L will chooses qL then given that n firms will choose their quantities q1 toqn simultaneously. To find SPNE we will solve it backwardly.
Given qL, the profit function of each firm i from 1 to n is (1−qL−Q−c).qi where Q=q1+q2+...+qn.
By differentiating it one can find best response which isqi = [1−qL−c−Q] for all i. Solving these equations we get qi = 1−qL−c
n+ 1
Substituting it in the profit function ofL to find his optimum choice.
So SPNE is qL = 1−c
2 and qi = 1−qL−c
n+ 1 for every possible history/subgame starts with qL for all i= 1 to n.
(b) Increase inn will not affectqL but will reduce price. Hence profit of the leader will fall.
(c) Yes such NE exists. Intuitively, Cournot equilibrium of this game is a NE (but not SPNE). Formally,
qL= 1−c n+ 2 and
∀i={1,2, ..., n} qi =
( 1−c
n+ 2 whenever qL = 1−c n+ 2
1 otherwise
You can check that no firm (including L) has any incentive to deviate from above strategy profile given the strategies of all other firms.
Ans2
S1 =S2 = {0,1, ...,10}. We will argue for player 1 same holds for player 2.
Step1: s1 = 10 is strictly dominated with s1 = 1 or 2 or ... 9. So both will eliminate 10.
Note at the beginning of the game no strategy other than 10 is strictly dominated, because each number 0 to 9 is a unique best response for some strategy of 2, being precise s1 =k is unique best response to s2 =k+ 1 for k = 1,2, ...,9 and 0 is unique best response of 0.
Step2: Given 10 has been deleted, now 9 is strictly dominated (say) by 8.
Spet3: Now 8 is strictly dominated. and so on...
Iteratively applying it till we left with 0 and 1. And now no strategy is strictly dominated.
So IESDS gives the following four equilibria (0,0) (0,1) (1,0) (1,1) Ans3
Lets say (x,1−x) and (1−y, y) are the offers proposed by player 1 and 2 respectively. For it to be SPNE it must satisfy the following two conditions
1
(1−y)α1 = δxα1 for player 1 when 2 makes the offer and (1−x)α2 = δyα2 for player 2 when 1 makes the offer Solving them gives you x= 1−δ2
1−δ1δ2 and y= 1−δ1
1−δ1δ2 where δi =δαi1 .
2