In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP) Anti-dumping duty
Contacts
Staying Updated
Customs, FTP and WTO newsletter
In the issue Customs
Notifications and circulars
• Pursuant to the Cadre structuring/
reorganization of CBEC, new posts in the rank of Commissioners of Customs have been created in DRI and DGCEI
• The Central Government has
constituted a High Level Committee (HLC) to interact with trade and industry
Case law Others
• Tribunal held to have the power to remand the matter back to the competent authority who had jurisdiction to pass an order, and it was not warranted to remand to the authority which has passed the order
Foreign trade policy
Notifications and circulars
• The Central Government has authorised the officer of DGFT to function as Appellate Authority against the orders passed by their subordinates
Case law
• Neither the Central Government nor DGFT held to have the power to amend the Foreign Trade Policy or withdraw any export benefit with retrospective effect
• Duty drawback granted to exporter not to be treated as evidence that the transporter had delivered the goods to foreign buyer and discharged his liabilities
• Restrictions and prohibitions on imports under licence could not be imposed by way of circulars and public notices by DGFT
Anti-dumping duty
• The Central Government has continued the levy of anti-dumping duty on import of Sodium Nitrite &
December 2014: Volume 17 Issue 09
In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP) Anti-dumping duty Contacts
Customs
Notifications and circulars
• Pursuant to the Cadre structuring/
reorganization of Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) new posts in the rank of Commissioners of Customs have been created in Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) for the adjudication of cases investigated by DRI and DGCEI.
(Circular No. 14/2014-Customs dated 11 December, 2014)
• The Central Government has amended the policy for export of cotton and cotton yarn to dispense with the requirement of registration for export of these products.
(Notification No. 102 and 103 (RE- 2013)/2009-14) dated 8 December, 2014)
• The Central Government has
constituted a High Level Committee (HLC) to interact with trade and industry as announced in Budget Speech 2014-15. HLC will give
recommendations to CBDT/ CBEC for issuance of appropriate clarifications by way of circulars, instructions, etc. on
tax issues.
(CBEC Press Note dated 3 December, 2014- http://www.cbec.gov.in/press- release/press-release-idx.htm) Case law
Classification
• In CC v Dejero Logix Pvt Ltd (2014 (310) ELT 254), the Delhi High Court held that broadcasting equipment for communication between field and news studio working with the help of GSM cellular network was classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8517 as
“apparatus for communication in a wired or wireless network” and not under CTH 8525 50 20 as “TV broadcast transmitter” since
broadcasting related to the public at large, and it was not intended for the general public, and was only for private purposes.
Valuation
• In Rail Associates Enterprises v CC (2014 (310) ELT 397), the Delhi
Tribunal held that the transaction value of exported goods could not be rejected when no doubt on declared value was raised in terms of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Export Goods) Rules, 2007.
2 December 2014 - Volume 17 Issue 09
In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP) Anti-dumping duty Contacts
Others
• In Ashapuri Metals Pvt Ltd v CC (2014- TIOL-2219-HC), the Gujarat High Court held that prima facie arguable case of assessee did not warrant total waiver of pre-deposit in cases where there was no evidence of financial hardship to the assessee.
• The Madras High Court in C P Aqua Culture (India) Pvt Ltd v CESTAT Chennai and Ors (2014-TIOL-2170- HC), held that in case the Tribunal found that there was an error in the order, the Tribunal had the power to remand the matter back to the competent authority who had the jurisdiction to pass an order, and it was not warranted to remand it to authority which had passed the order.
In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP)
Anti-dumping duty Contacts
• The Central Government has amended the application form for IEC issuance/
amendment and has also made it mandatory to file the application form online effective from 1 January, 2015.
(Public Notice No. 76(RE-2013)/2009- 14 dated 27 November, 2014)
Case law
• The Gujarat High Court ,in Roxul Rockwool Insulation India Pvt Ltd v UOI (2014-TIOL-2123-HC-CUS), held that on clearance of goods from SEZ to DTA, no CVD was payable in case there was any exemption from payment of
CVD under section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944, because SEZ Act provided that clearance from SEZ to DTA were in the nature of dutiable imports. Hence, on clearance from SEZ to DTA, duty equivalent to import duties was payable.
Also, if there was any exemption on import, the same had to be granted.
• In Malik Tanning Industries v UoI (2014-TIOL-2197-HC), the Delhi High Court held that neither the Central Government nor DGFT had the power to amend the Foreign Trade Policy or withdraw any export benefit with retrospective effect.
4 December 2014 - Volume 17 Issue 09
Foreign trade policy Notifications
• The Central Government has authorised the officer of DGFT to function as Appellate Authority against the orders passed by their subordinates officers as under:
(Notification No. 101(RE-2013)/2009-14 dated 5 December, 2014)
Designation of Adjudicating Authority Appellate Authority Assistant/Deputy/Joint Director General of
Foreign Trade (DGFT) Additional DGFT
Additional DGFT DGFT aided by one Addl. DGFT
in the Directorate General of Foreign Trade
Development Commissioner, Special Economic Zones
Designated Officer, Department of Electronics
& Information Technology
In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP)
Anti-dumping duty Contacts
• The Delhi High Court, in DSJ Communication Ltd v UoI and Ors (2014-TIOL-2233-HC), held that no prejudice had been caused to importer in case DGFT had not granted extension of period for fulfilling export obligation in a case where there was no attempt by the importer to export any alternate product.
• In Transport Corporation of India Ltd v Ganesh Polytex Ltd (2014 (310) ELT 213 (SC)), the Supreme Court held that duty drawback granted to exporter could not be considered as evidence that the transporter had duly delivered the goods to foreign buyer, and had duly discharged his liabilities.
• The Ahmedabad Tribunal, in Global Exim v CC (2013 (310) ELT 322), held that restrictions and prohibitions on imports under licence could not be imposed by way of circulars and public notices by DGFT.
In the issue Customs
Foreign trade policy (FTP) Anti-dumping duty Contacts
6 December 2014 - Volume 17 Issue 09
Anti-dumping duty Notifications
• The Central Government has continued the levy of anti-dumping duty on import of Sodium Nitrite, falling under CTH 28341010, originating in or exported from People’s Republic of China, till 16 August, 2016.
(Customs (ADD) Notification No.
46/2014 dated 8 December, 2014)
• The Central Government has continued the levy of anti-dumping duty on import of Cable Ties, falling under CTH 3926, originating in or exported from People’s Republic of China and Chinese Taipei, for a period of five years from 9 December, 2014.
(Customs (ADD) Notification No.
47/2014 dated 9 December, 2014)
In the issue CENVAT Service tax
VAT/Entry tax/Sales tax Contacts
For private circulation only
This publication does not constitute professional advice. The information in this publication has been obtained or derived from sources believed by PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (PwCPL) to be reliable but PwCPL does not represent that this information is accurate or complete. Any opinions or estimates contained in this publication represent the judgment of PwCPL at this time and are subject to change without notice. Readers of this publication are advised to seek their own professional advice before taking any course of action or decision, for which they are entirely responsible, based on the contents of this publication. PwCPL neither accepts or assumes any responsibility or liability to any reader of this publication in respect of the information contained within it or for any decisions readers may take or decide not to or fail to take.
About PwC
PwC* helps organisations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We are a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 195,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax and advisory services.
PwC India refers to the network of PwC firms in India, having offices in: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune. For more information about PwC India's service offerings, please visit www.pwc.in.
*PwC refers to PwC India and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.in
Contacts Delhi
Vivek Mishra/Gautam Khattar Ph: +91 (124) 3306000 Mumbai
Dharmesh Panchal/S Satish Ph: +91 (22) 6689 1000 Kolkata
Gopal Agarwal
Ph: +91 (33) 2357 9100/4404 6000 Bangalore
Pramod Banthia
Ph: +91 (80) 4079 6000
Hyderabad
Ananthanarayanan S Ph: +91 (40) 4424 6363 Chennai
Harisudhan M
Ph: +91 (44) 4228 5000 Pune
Nitin Vijaivergia
Ph: +91 (20) 4100 4444 Ahmedabad
Dharmesh Panchal/Niren Shethia Ph: +91 (22) 6689 1000