293 STUDY AND CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF NANOMATERIAL AND PROPERTIES OF
COARSE AND FINE GRAINED SOIL: A REVIEW Pragyank Verma
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Prof. Rajesh Joshi
HOD, Department of Civil, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Abstract - Outcomes of the extraordinary development of urbanization and industrialisation in non-industrial nations, particularly in significant urban communities, constrained the geotechnical architect to use even the unacceptable land, once disposed of, for geotechnical applications like land recovery, dike development, refilling, and so on. The unsatisfactory land, in the designing sense, is having unfortunate properties like low shear strength, high compressibility, high expanding/shrinkage and furthermore liquefiable nature, frequently perceived as tricky soils. Next to this, age of wild and non-designed modern squanders are likewise representing an extraordinary limitation to the geotechnical engineer as they consume exceptionally enormous space as well as prompting unhygienic climate.
With the coming of ground improvement strategies, it is feasible to change dangerous soils and modern waste into an ingenious material to such an extent that the designed soils or modern squanders meet the plan prerequisites which obviously is an element of a particular sort of geotechnical projects. Of the accessible shallow or profound improvement strategies, job of compound admixtures (for instance lime, concrete, and so on) is assuming a urgent part in relieving the issues experienced with risky soil and modern squanders, either through characteristic blending or grouting process, the upside of being utilization of synthetic added substances can be conveyed both for pre-constructional and post-constructional processes. By and by, frequently the proficiency and adequacy of soil-substance added substances or modern squanders -compound added substances cooperations are generally hampered by the less unambiguous surface region of the synthetic constituents of added substances and accordingly would be prompting inadequate communication between both of the constituents.
1 NANOMATERIALS AND SOIL STABLISATION
Nanoparticles, ultrafine units with aspect measures in nano meters, particles between 1nm to 100nm, exist in the regular world and are likewise made because of human exercises. Due to their submicroscopic size, they have exceptional material qualities and made nano particles has acquired significance in different commonsense applications including bio clinical, mechanical technology, hardware and catalysis in ecological remediation. In field of the structural Engineering, nano particles are utilized for the plan and development exercises, particularly for creating self- recuperating concrete, as an isolation diminishing specialist and furthermore as a water cleansing specialist. Carbon nano tube, titanium oxide, nano silica, nano copper and nano vanadium are a portion of the nano particles utilized in development enterprises, concrete,
concrete, steel, glass, coatings, nano sensors, plastic sunlight based cell, and so forth. As an expansion of nanotechnology, not many endeavors have additionally been made in the new times to concentrate on the exhibition of nanomaterials for geotechnical applications, for example, adjustment of bore openings utilizing nano silica, adjustment tricky soil utilizing nano mud and carbon nano tube.
In light of fast development in urbanization, industrialization and populace, structural designers are compelled to use accessible land for infrastructural improvements and partnered administration utilities. Not constantly, great quality soils are experienced and without sound soils, the geotechnical engineers are forgotten about with just choice of changing the hazardous soils into a decent soil to such
294 an extent that the balanced out soil would
meet the plan prerequisites. Soil adjustment/insitu ground improvement methods are assuming exceptionally pivotal part in changing dangerous soils into a designed soil. Close to this, incredible danger is imagined through the unloading of modern squanders which consume huge space as well as representing a threat to the climate, for example age of flyash from nuclear energy stations. Taking into account the expense of synthetic admixture, for instance concrete, lime, bitumen and so on, on one side, a viable usage of modern waste on the opposite side, a definite examination has been done in this exploration work to concentrate on the presentation of hazardous soil on the expansion of ball processed nanomaterials which incorporate nano modern waste (flyash, copper slag, silica) and nano admixtures (lime, concrete), nano earth and MWCNT.
1.1 Objectives of the work
The current examination was conveyed with the accompanying goals:
• To concentrate because of nano estimated compound admixtures (nano lime and nano concrete) and nano measured modern squanders (nano flyash, nano silica and nano copper slag) on the file properties, compaction and unconfined compressive strength qualities of normal soils.
• To concentrate because of nano earth and Multi Wall Carbon Nano Tube (MWCNT) on the record properties, compaction, unconfined compressive strength and solidification qualities of normal soils with and without compound admixture.
• To concentrate because of nano lime as grout material on the load settlement and penetrability attributes of fine and coarse sand bed of changing relative densities.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
This section manages writing accessible on the significant points, for example, Studies on readiness of nano particles, Effect of nano particles on the way of behaving of development materials, Studies on nano innovation in different
geotechnical applications, Studies on execution of nano particles in soil grouting and Studies on properties of soils with various sorts of added substances and nano particles.
2.1 Studies on Preparation of Nano Particles
Dey et al. (2011) has fostered an arrangement to create nano particles from synthetic substances like calcium chloride, calcium oxide, potassium nitrate, silver nitrate and so forth. Impact of various convergences of these nano particles on properties of soil was noticed.
The outcomes were contrasted and untreated soils as well as soils blended in with same centralizations of business synthetics. It was seen that nano particles further developed shear strength, lessen porousness, and decrease compressibility of soil. The lab arrangement comprised of an air blower, a warming chamber and an assortment chamber. The synthetic which was broken into nano size was entirely blended in with refined water in a recepticle. The compacted air under 80- 100 kg/cm2 pressure was utilized to scatter drops of compound arrangement drawn from the recepticle. The scattered synthetic was permitted to go through the warming chamber keeping a temperature around 300ºC to dissipate the water.
Nano particles as powder were then gathered in a gathering chamber
Thomas Paul (2007) changed over the flyash into nano flyash by high energy ball processing. The nano organized fly debris has been described for its molecule size by utilizing molecule size analyzer, explicit surface region with the assistance of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface region contraption and construction by X- beam diffraction studies. SEM and TEM have been utilized to concentrate on molecule conglomeration and state of the particles. On ball processing, the molecule size got decreased from 60μm to 148 nm which is multiple times higher than non-nano size particles, and the surface region expanded from 0.249 m2/g to 25.53 m2/g for example by over 100 percent. The typical molecule size of the fly debris secured was 60μm. Ball processing of new fly debris as long as 60 hours decreased its size by a greatness of multiple times to 148 nm. The particular
295 surface region has expanded from 0.249
m2/g for new fly debris to 25.53 m2/g for fly debris ball processed as long as 60 hours. The expansion in surface region has been viewed as in excess of multiple times in extent.
Patil et al. (2012) produced a nano class-F flyash by high energy ball processing. Ball processing was done for a complete span of 60 hours and tests were taken out at ordinary stretches for describing different properties of the ball processed flyash. It was found that following 60 hours of processing, crystallite size of quartz deliberately work present in the flyash was diminished from 37.58 nm to 9.25 nm and the typical molecule size got decreased from 94.35 m to 0.70 m. The round shape and smooth surface of the flyash have been changed into unpredictable shape and harsh surface by ball processing which was proven from TEM and SEM studies.
Thakur Prasad Yadav and Ram Manohar Yadav (2012) examined the least demanding big picture perspective for combining nanomaterials. Among all big picture perspectives, high energy ball processing has been generally utilized for the union of different nanomaterials, nano grains, nano amalgam, nano composites and nanomaterials. In high- energy ball processing, plastic deformity, cold-welding and crack were transcendent elements, in which the distortion prompts an adjustment of molecule shape, cold- welding prompts an expanded in molecule size and break prompts diminished in molecule size bringing about the development of fine scattered alloying particles in the grain-refined delicate framework. Likewise, creator has portrayed the orderly perspective on the fundamental idea of mechanical processing, verifiable view and uses of mechanical processing in the combination of different nanomaterials and nano composites.
2.2 Effect of Nano Particles on the Behaviour of Construction Materials Patel (2012) assessed the utilization of nano meta-kaolin earth in concrete mortar contrasted and regular concrete mortar. Concrete mortar with and without nano dirt (NC) was tried for its compressive strength and porousness.
The compressive strength tests were performed on 70 mm solid shape tests for multi day and multi day strength. It was observed that the improvement of compressive strength was around 300%
at 1% NC and around 290% at 2% NC for multi day testing, while for multi day testing it was 310% for 1% NC and 200%
for 2% NC. The nano meta-kaolin in concrete mortar went about as nano fiber because of its morphology. The porousness of examples with 1% of nano dirt was viewed as around 150% more, while for examples with 2% nano earth it was viewed as 200% more than that of examples without nano mud. It was likewise seen that the expansion of nano earth to solidify mortar sped up its drying limit.
Konstantin sobolev et al. (2006) made sense of the nanomaterials and nanotechnology for showing up the elite execution concrete composites, with the entire scope of recently presented "savvy"
properties. They analyzed the mechanical properties of mortars with nano-SiO2 incorporated by sol-gel technique. Results showed an expanded in compressive strength of mortars with created nanoparticles at beginning phases of solidifying followed by the strength decrease at later age. Expansion of super plasticizer was proposed to beat this snag.
Super plasticized mortars with chose nano-SiO2 showed a 15-20% expanded the compressive strength, coming to up to 144.8 MPa at 90th day age. They found that the mechano-compound enactment was viewed as successful strategy to work on the strength of concrete based materials.
Sanjeev kumar et al. (2012) talked about the impact of multi walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) on the strength qualities of hydrated Portland concrete glue.
Different concrete CNT composites and a comparable control blend were ready by blending 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 percent CNTs (by weight of concrete) to check the strength gain in Portland concrete composite material. The examples were tried at 7, 28, 60, 90 and 180 days of relieving and they saw that the compressive and parting rigidity expanded in Portland concrete CNT composites having CNT content of 0.5% by weight of
296 Portland concrete. Above 0.5% CNT
content, the strength anyway diminished.
Morsy et al. (2010) examined the impact of nano dirt on the mechanical properties and microstructure of portland concrete mortar. The nano dirt utilized was nano-metakaolin (NMK), which was ready by warm actuation of kaolin earth for two hours at 750°C. The mixed concrete was ready by blending Ordinary Portland concrete and nano-metakaolin.
OPC was to some extent subbed by NMK of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% by weight of concrete. The outcomes demonstrated that compressive strength and rigidity of the concrete mortar with NMK were higher than that of the plain concrete mortar with a similar water-fastener proportion. At 8% NMK substitution, the improvement of rigidity was 49% and that of compressive strength was 7%. The investigations, utilizing Differential Scanning Calorimetry thermo grams of hydrated NMK mortar, demonstrated that crystallizations delivered by NMK and calcium hydroxide could top off the pores and upgrade microstructure and mechanical properties of cementitious materials. The SEM perceptions affirmed that the NMK was going about as filler, yet in addition as an activator to advance hydration process.
Vijaya Bhaskar and
Shanmugasundaram (2016) made an endeavor to concentrate on the impact of multi-walled carbon nanotubes of 30nm breadth (MWCNTs), on concrete as an added substance, for 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0% and 1.2% to weight of concrete. The outcomes showed that multi-walled carbon nanotube expanded the strength boundaries and miniature underlying ways of behaving. They found that multi- walled carbon nanotubes of 0.8 rates can be the ideal level of added substances with regards to execution and strength.
2.3 Studies on Nanotechnology in Various Geotechnical Engineering 2.3.1 Soil Grouting
Wager and Greenwood (1961) fostered a graphical connection between the rheological qualities of grout and its ability to pervade soil and demonstrated that infusion of concrete grout was constrained by thickness and shear strength in the early and later stages,
separately. Clear expansions in the thickness and shear strength were accounted for the concrete grout with water/concrete proportion (W/C) not surpassing 0.6.
Vipulanandan et al. (1992) concentrated on the properties of concrete grouts and grouted sands with added substances and showed that the greatest molecule size should not surpass 1/3 to 1/10 the size of void to enter a development at sensible tension and rate.
Perret et al. (1997) concentrated on the inject ability of fine sand (0.16/0.63 mm) utilizing Type I and Type III portland concrete and a miniature fine concrete in the research center as per the sand section test (22 mm measurement x 370 mm level) embraced from the European standard NF P18-901. The grouts were ready with water/concrete proportion shifting somewhere in the range of 0.5 and 2.0 and contained various convergences of silica rage, super plasticizer and colloidal specialist. The consequences of this study showed that it is feasible to infuse concrete based grouts in fine to medium sand utilizing exceptionally flowable concrete grouts with admixtures. In any case, the entrance level of grout was low (for example <150 mm) for grouts with water/concrete proportion not surpassing 0.6.
Gallagher (2000) analyzed the adjustment of liquefiable soils utilizing colloidal silica grout and in which free sand was effectively immersed with colloidal silica grout and consequently exposed to two shaking occasions to assess the reaction of the treated sand layer and found that the treated soil didn't melt.
Costas Anagnostopoulos (2005) explored the way of behaving of granular soil with polymer grouts. Grouts were ready by utilizing concrete, dirt, water in various rates alongside a measure of acrylic gum or methyl - acrylate copolymer emulsion. Grouting tests were performed through 10 cm width and 150 cm level sections, loaded up with granular soil with molecule size dispersion of 2 - 12.7 mm. The exploratory outcomes uncovered that the expansion of latexes in thick unadulterated concrete grouts
297 worked on significantly the physical and
mechanical properties of infused soils.
Raju et al. (2012) made an endeavor to concentrate on the impact of concrete grout in working on the bearing limit of the sandy soil. Concrete grout with various proportion of 10:1 (Water:
Cement), 9:1, 8:1, 7:1, 6:1, 5:1, 4:1 were infused into the dirt. Grouting test was performed with punctured PVC pipe in a tank of 20 cm x 20 cm x 20 cm sandy soil. To concentrate on the improvement in the strength property of the grouted soil, the plate load test was performed with 5 cm x 5 cm plate on the grouted sand following 3 days restoring and 7 days relieving. The exploratory outcomes uncovered that as the void proportion and grout proportion diminished, a definitive burden expanded.
Mirza et al. (2013) examined the properties on seven miniature fine concrete grouts and contrasted and two portland concretes. Grouts were tried at water-to-solidify proportions of 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, by weight, and at 4 0C, 100C and 20 0C. The properties contemplated were: grain size appropriation, three rheological properties (thickness, draining and setting time), and five mechanical properties (modulus of flexibility, Poisson's proportion, compressive strength, bond strength and development/shrinkage).
Stalin and Balakumaran (2012) researched the presentation of nano size particles in soil grouting strategy.
Saturation tests were led in section test for nano silica and Bentonite answer for shifting molecule size (coarse, medium and fine sand), differing thickness (free and thick state) and fluctuating consistency of grout arrangement (5%, 10%, and 15%). Time taken for consistent incentive for grout arrangement was estimated and connected with thickness of sand, molecule size and consistency of arrangement. Tests directed were
saturation test, section test, stream test and steady head porousness test.
Vadivel rajendiran and Stalin (2013) concentrated on the deviation in properties of concrete grout and colloidal nano silica consolidated concrete grout (nano-SiO2) between control medium and preliminaries by 0.5% and 1%. Significant boundaries and properties for grouting material, for example, flowability, draining potential, setting times and compressive strength were contemplated. It was presumed that expansion of nano- particles worked on the flowability, setting time and compressive strength of grout material.
2.3.2 Soil Stabilisation
Zhang (2007) proposed another arrangement of soil in light of the grain size conveyance. Nano particles of generally 1 nm to 100 nm are the littlest particles in soil conditions and exist in one of the three unique structures: Nano platelets, Nano wires or Nanotubes, and Nano dabs. Because of their little size, soil nano particles normally showed exceptional improved surface properties and consequently connected all the more effectively with other soil particles and arrangement. It was believed that inferable from the incredibly huge explicit surface region, surface charges, and once in a while nano porosity, these particles, even preset at a little portion, may essentially influence soil's physio- compound way of behaving and designing properties. Soils containing nano particles with nanoscale intra-molecule voids typically displayed a lot higher fluid and plastic restricts that generally showed irreversible changes after drying, while the presence of stringy nano particles ordinarily makes the dirt more thixotropic and improves its shear strength. Table 2.1 addresses the dirt arrangement proposed by Zhang (2007).
Table 2.1 Proposed soil classification by Zhang (2007)
298 Taha et al. (2009) directed the lab trials to
concentrate on the key geotechnical properties of combinations of regular soils and its item after ball processing activity.
The item after ball processing process was named as nano-soil in this. SEM examination showed considerably more nano size particles were acquired after the processing system. Testing and correlation of the properties of University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) soil as to its fluid breaking point, plastic cutoff, versatility file, and explicit surface and after expansion of its nano-soil were additionally led. Research facility tests results showed that the upsides of fluid breaking point and plastic cutoff points were higher after nano-soil expansion. In any case, its pliancy record decreased which is worthwhile in numerous geotechnical developments.
2.4 Summary of the Literature
The accompanying remarkable focuses are seen from the writing audited:
• Expansion of nano particles like fly debris, concrete, silica and lime on soil diminished LL and PI esteems and expanded PL values. The dmax diminished and OMC expanded.
Expansion in UCC strength relied upon level of added substance and restoring time.
• Compressive and rigidity of the concrete mortar with nano- metakaolin is higher than that of the plain concrete mortar with a similar water-fastener proportion.
• Nano-added substances to solidify mortar goes about as a nano-fiber, fillers and furthermore as an activator to advance hydration process. In this way, it expands the compressive and elasticity of concrete mortar.
• Nano particles impact the strength, penetrability and obstruction properties of soil. Execution of nanoparticles is better compared to non-nano estimated particles.
• Execution of the expansion of nano- sized particles to soil relies upon the kind, size and measure of nanomaterial utilized and furthermore relies upon the
properties of soil to be gotten to the next level.
• Nano-soil can be utilized in soil improvement and adjustment of delicate sandy dirt to increment compressive strength and inner grating, additionally decline the plastic file of the dirt.
3 SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDIES Impact of nano particles on the record, compaction, solidification and UCC strength qualities of regular soil and concrete/lime admixed normal soil were assessed in this concentrate through characteristic blending, just for a restricted time of restoring. Truth be told, restoring period will improve the file and designing properties of nano particles admixed soil particularly incase if the nano particles are having cementitious properties. As an expansion of the current work impact of nano particles on soil for differing restoring period might be done.
Challenges are knowledgeable about planning nano modern waste particles through ball processing process.
Indeed, even following 24 hours of ball processing processes, just couple of grams of nano particles alone could be delivered. An elective technique might be sent in course of assembling nano particles to defeat the lumbering time bound process and furthermore the expense of creation.
Load test and penetrability test were directed on nano lime grouted sand bed of fluctuating densities. Model test might be directed on dirt bed of changing textures with nano lime or nano concrete grouting of fluctuating fixation and consistency to assess the impact of nano particles in clayey soil.
REFERENCES
1. Ahad Bagherzadeh Khalkhali, Iman Safarzadeh & Habib Rahimi Manbar 2019, Investigating the Effect of Nano clay Additives on the Geotechnical Properties of Clay and Silt Soil‟, Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63-74.
2. Ali nazari, Shadiriahi & Shirin Riahi 2010,
„Benefits of Fe2O3 Nanoparticles in concrete mixing matrix‟, Journal of American science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 102-106.
3. Ali Zomorodian, SM, Moghispour Shabnama, Soleymani Armina & Brendan C O'Kelly 2017,
„Strength enhancement of clean and
299 kerosene-contaminated sandy lean clay using
nano clay and nanosilica as additives‟, Applied Clay Science, vol. 140, pp. 140-147.
4. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, „Annual Book of ASTM Standard‟.
5. Amit Aroraa & Birpal Singhb 2019,
„Parampreet Kaurc Performance of Nano- particles in stabilization of soil: a comprehensive review‟, Materials Today:
Proceedings, vol. 17, pp. 124-130, 2214-7853
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd.
6. Anagnostopoulos A Coastas 2005, „Laboratory study of an injected granular soil with polymer grouts‟, Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 20, pp. 525-533.
7. Antonio Alberto S Correiaa, Pedro DF Casaleiroa & Maria Graça BV Rasteirob 2015,
„Applying multiwall carbon nanotubes for soil stabilization‟, Procedia Engineering, vol. 102, pp. 1766–1775.
8. Arabania, M, Haghib, AK, Mohammadzade Sanic, A & Kamboozia, N, 2012, „Use of Nano clay for Improvement the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Soil Stabilized by Cement‟, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Nanostructures (ICNS4),12-14 March, 2012, Kish Island, I.R. Iran.
9. Arulraj, P & Carmichae, J 2011, „Effect of Nano- flyash on strength of concrete‟, International journal of civil and structural engineering, vol. 2, no 2, ISSN 0976–4399, pp. 475-482.
10. Bahmani, SH, Bujang, BK, Asadi, A &
Farzadnia, N 2014, „Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2 Nano particles and cement‟, Construction and building materials, vol. 64, pp. 350-359.
11. Balakumaran, G & Stalin, VK 2012,
„Performance of Nano size particles in soil grouting‟, Indian geotechnical conference, New Delhi, pp. 139-142.
12. Barkhodari, K 2011, „Nanotechnology in Geotechnical Engineering‟, Advanced Material Research, vol. 261-263, pp. 524-528.
13. Barkhordari, K 2011, „Nanotechnology in Geotechnical Engineering‟, Advanced Material Research, vol. 261-263, pp. 524-528.
14. Bayshakhi Deb Nath, Md. Keramat Ali Molla
& Grytan Sarkar 2017, „Study on Strength Behavior of Organic Soil Stabilized with Fly Ash‟, International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2017, Article ID 5786541, 6 pages,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5786541.
15. Brian Green 2006, „Development of a high density cementitious Rock matching Grout using Nano particles‟, Nanotechnology of concrete: Recent developments and Future Perspectives.
16. Changizi, F & Haddad, A 2015, „Strength properties of soft clay treated with mixture of nano-SiO2 and recycled polyester fiber‟, J.
Rock Mechanics Geotech Engg., vol. 7, pp.
367-378.
17. Costas Anagnostopoulos 2005, „Cement–clay grouts modified with acrylic resin or methyl methacrylate ester: Physical and mechanical properties investigated the granular soil with polymer grouts‟, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 21, pp. 252- 257.
18. Dey, AK, Jumrik Taipodia & Jagori Dutta 2011, „Effect of Nano Particles on properties of Soil‟ Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, December 15-17, Kochi, Paper No-As-218, pp.105-108.
19. Durmusoglu, E & Corapcioglu, MY 2000,
„Experimental study of horizontal barrier formation by colloidal silica‟, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 126, No.9, p.833-841.
20. Ebrahim Nohani & Ezatolah Alimakan 2015,
„Effect of Nanoparticles on Geotechnical Properties of clay‟, International Journal of life sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 25-27.
21. Endene Emmanuela, Chun Chern Laua, Vivi Anggrainia & Pooria Pasbakhshb 2019,
„Stabilization of a soft marine clay using halloysite nanotubes: A multi-scale approach‟, Applied Clay Science, vol. 173, pp.
65-78.
22. Faisal I Shalabi, Ibrahim M Asi & Hisham Y Qasrawi 2017, „Effect of by-product steel slag on the engineering properties of clay soils‟, Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences vol. 29, pp. 394-399.
23. Ferkel, H & Hellmig, RJ 1999, „Effect of Nanopowder Deagglomeration on the Densities of Nanocrystalline Ceramic Green Bodies and Their Sintering Behaviour' Nanostructured Materials 11(5): 617-622.
24. Gallagher M. Patricia, 2007, 'Stabilization of Liquefiable soils using colloidal silica grout‟, Journal of Materials in civil Engineering, vol.
19.
25. Garnier, J.; Gaudin, C.; Springman, S.M.;
Culligan, P.J.; Goodings, D.J.; Konig, D.;
Kutter, B.L.; Phillips, R.; Randolph, M.F.;
Thorel, L. 2007, „Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling‟, International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 7 (3): 1–
23.
26. Guoping Zhang 2007, „Soil Nano particles and their influence on engineering properties of soils‟ Advances in measurement and modeling of soil behavior, ASCE,GSP, vol.
173, pp.1-13.
27. Hareesh, P & Vinothkumar, R 2016,
„Assessment of nanomaterials on Geotechnical properties of clayey soils‟, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Innovations and Solutions, E- ISSN: 2348 –8352, pp. 66-71.
28. Hongzhi Cui, Zhiyang Jin, Xiaohua Bao, Waiching Tang & Biqin 2018, „Dong Effect of carbon fiber and nanosilica on shear properties of silty soil and the mechanisms‟, Construction and Building Materials, vol.
189, pp. 286-295.
29. Huang, Y & Wang, L, 2016, „Experimental studies on nanomaterials for soil improvement‟, Journal of Environmental Earth Science, vol. 75, p. 497.
30. Jaber Shahiri & Mojtaba Ghasemi, 2017, Utilization of Soil Stabilization with Cement and Copper Slag as Subgrade Materials in Road Embankment Construction, International Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 5. no.1.
31. Jamal, MA, Alsharef, Mohd Raihan Taha, Ali Akbar Firoozi & Panbarasi Govindasamy,
300 2015, „Potential of Using Nanocarbons to
Stabilize Weak Soils‟, Procedia Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), vol. 102, pp.
1766 -1775.
32. Jason L Coo, Zac PS So & Charles WW Ng 2016, „Effect of nanoparticles on the shrinkage properties of clay‟, Engineering Geology, vol. 213, pp. 84-88.
33. Kolias, S, Kasselouri-Rigopoulou, V &
Karahalios, A 2005. „Stabilisation of clayey soils with high calcium fly ash and cement Cement & Concrete Composites, vol. 27, pp.
301-331.
34. Konstantin Sobolev, Ismael Flores, Roman Hermosillo & Leticia M Torres-Martinez 2006,
„Proceedings of ACI Session on 'Nanotechnology of Concrete: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives‟, November 7, Denver, USA.
35. Laboratory Testing of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes 1987, „Compendium of Indian Standards on Soil Engineering‟, SP 36- Part I.
36. Lambe, TW & Whitman, RV 1969, Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons.
37. Majeed, ZH & Taha, MR 2012, „Effect of nanomaterial treatment on geotechnical properties of a penang soft soil‟, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, vol. 2, no. 11, pp.
587-592.
38. Majeed, ZH, Taha, MR & Jawad, IT 2014,
„Stabilization of soft soil using nanomaterials‟, Research Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, pp. 503-509.
39. Marzieh kadiver & Taha, MR 2011,
„Nanotechnology in geotechnical engineering‟, Advanced Materials Research, vol. 261-263, pp.524-528.
40. Meisam Bahari, Mohammad Nikookar, Mahyar Arabani, Akbar Khodaparast Haghi &
Hossein Khodabandeh, 2013, „Stabilization of silt by nano-clay‟, 7th National Congress on Civil Engineering, 7-8 May, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
41. Mitchell, JK 1993, Fundamentals of Soil Behaviuor, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons.
42. Mohamed Morsy, Saleh Alsayed &
Mohammad Aqel 2010, „Effect of nano-clay on mechanical properties and microstructure of ordinary Portland cement mortar‟, International Journal of Civil &
Environmental Engineering, IJCEE-IJENS, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 23-27.
43. Mohammad R Irshidat & Mohammed H Al- Saleh 2018, „Influence of Nano clay on the Properties and Morphology of Cement Mortar‟, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Copyright
© 2018 Korean Society of Civil Engineers, vol.
22, no. 10, pp. 4056-4063, DOI 10.1007/s12205-018-1642-x.
44. Mohd Raihan Taha, Jamal MA Alsharef, Ramez A Al-Mansob & Tanveer Ahmed Khan 2018, „Effects of Nano-Carbon Reinforcement on the Swelling and Shrinkage Behaviour of Soil‟, Sains Malaysiana vol. 47, no. 1, pp.
195–205, http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm- 2018-4701-23.
45. Morsky, MS, Alsayed, SH & Aqel, M 2007,
„Effect of Nano clay on mechanical properties and microstructure of ordinary portland
cement mortar‟, International journal of civil
& environmental engineering, IJCEE-IJENS, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 21-28.
46. Mostafa Mohammadi & Mohammadreza Niazian 2013, „Investigation of Nano-clay effect on geotechnical properties of rasht clay‟, International journal of advanced scientific and technical research, no. 3, vol. 3.
47. Navid Ghasabkolaei, Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti, Nader Roshan, & Seiyed E Ghasemi, 2017, „Geotechnical properties of the soils modified with nanomaterials: A comprehensive review, archives of civil and mechanica lengineering, vol. 17, pp. 639–650.
48. Neethu, SV & Remya, S 2013, „Engineering Behaviour of Nano clay Stabilized Soil‟, Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, December 22-24,Roorkee, pp. 1- 7.
49. Norazlan Khalid, Mohd Fadzil Arshad, Mazidah Mukri, Kamaruzzaman Mohamed &
Faizah Kamarudin 2015, „Influence of nano- soil particles in soft soil stabilization‟, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 20, Bund. 2, pp. 731-738 50. Panbarasi Govindasamy & Mohd Raihan
Taha, Jamal Alsharef & Kowstubaa Ramalingam 2017, „Influence of Nanolime and Curing Period on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soil, Hindawi‟, Applied and Environmental Soil Science, vol.
2017, Article ID8307493, 9 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8307493.
51. Paoli, BD, Bosco, B, Granata, R & Bruce, DA 1992, „Fundamental Observation on Cement Based Grouts (1): Traditional Materials‟, Proceeding of Grouting, Soil improvement and Geosynthetics' Volume 1, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, ASCE, New Orleans Louisiana, pp. 474-485.
52. Patel, K 2012, „The use of nano clay as a constructional material‟, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp.1382-1386.
53. Patil, AG & Anandhan, S 2012, „Ball milling of class-F indian fly ash obtained from a thermal power station‟, International journal of energy engineering, ISSN 2225-6571, vol.
2, no. 2, pp. 57-62.
54. Patterson, AL 1939, „The Scherrer Formula for X-Ray Particle Size Determination‟, American Physical Society.
55. Perret, S, Ballivy, G, Khayat, K & Mnif, T 1997, „Injectability of Fine Sand with Cement- based Grout. Proceeding of Grouting:
Compaction, Remediation and Testing‟, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, no. 86. pp.
289-305.
56. Prasad, PS & Ramana, GV 2016, „Feasibility study of copper slag as a structural fill in reinforced soil Structures‟, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 44, pp. 623-640.
57. Prince Arulraj, G & Jemimah Carmichael, M 2011, „Effect of Nano -Flyash on Strength of Concrete‟, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, ISSN 0976 – 4399, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 475-482.
58. Raffle, JF & Greenwood, DA 1961, „The Relationship Between the Rheological Characteristics of Grouts and Their Capacity to Permeate Soils‟, Proceedings of 5th
301 International Conference on Soil Mechanics
and Foundation Engineering, London, vol. 2, pp. 789-793.
59. Raju, K, Dayakar, V & Venkat Raman, P 2012, „Study on Permeation Grouting Using Cement Grout in Sandy Soil‟, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR- JMCE) ISSN: 2278-1684 vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 05- 10.
60. Rao, JB, Narayanaswami, P & Siva Prasad, K 2012, „The Stability of Nano Structured Fly Ash Synthesized by High Energy Ball Milling‟, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 284-299.
61. Sanjeev Kumar, Prabir Kolay, Sunil Malla &
Sanjay Mishra 2012, „Effect of Multi walled Carbon Nanotubes on Mechanical Strength of Cement Paste‟, 84, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE.
62. Sanusha Babu & Shyla Joseph 2015, „Effect of Nanomaterials on Properties of Soft soil‟, International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 634-637.
63. Sayed Hessam Bahmani, Bujang BK Huat, Afshin Asadi & Nima Farzadnia 2015,
„Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2 Nanoparticles and cement‟, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 64, pp. 350–359.
64. Semet Çelik, Alireza Negahdar & Mehdi Jafarian Barough 2019, „Effect of Nanoparticles on Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Granular Soils by Using Injection Method‟, J Biochem Tech (2019) Special Issue, ISSN: 0974-2328, no. 2, pp.
56-60.
65. Seyed Jassem Hosseini & Alireza Tabarsab 2015, „Effect of Adding Nano clay on the Mechanical Behaviour of Fine-grained Soil Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers‟, Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 59-6.
66. Shenbaga R Kaniraj, Vasant G Havanagi 1999, Compressive strength of cement stabilized fly ash-soil mixtures Cement and Concrete Research vol. 29, pp. 673-677.
67. Sivapullaih, PV, Prashanth, JP, Sridharan, A
& Narayana, BV 1998, 'Reactive silica &
strength of fly ashes', Geotechnical &
Geological Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 239-250.
68. Sridharan, A & Prakash, K 2000,
„Classification Procedures for Expansive Soils‟, Proc. Instn Civil. Engrs, Geotech.
Engng, vol. 143, pp. 235-240.
69. Stalin, VK & Balakumaran, G 2012,
„Performance of Nanosize Particles in Soil Grouting‟, Proceedings in Indian Geotechnical Conference, pp. 139-142.
70. Taha 2009, „A review of stabilization of soils by using nanomaterials', Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, ISSN 1991- 8178, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 576-581.
71. Taha, MR & Taha, OME 2012, „Influence of nano-material on the expansive and shrinkage soil behavior‟, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14:1190, pp. 1-13.
72. Taha, MR 2009, „Geotechnical properties of soil-ball milled soil mixtures‟, Nano technology in construction, vol. 3, pp. 377- 382.
73. Taha, MR, Jawad, IT & Majeed, ZH 2015,
„Treatment of soft soil with nano-magnesium
oxide‟, 5th International Symposium on Nanotechnology in Construction.
74. Thakur Prasad Yadav, Ram Manohar Yadav &
Dinesh Pratap 2012, „Singh Mechanical Milling: a Top Down Approach for the Synthesis of Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites‟, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 22-48.
75. Thomas Paul, K 2007, „Fly Ash: A waste from thermal power stations, by high energy ball milling‟, Nano scale research letter, vol. 2, pp.
397-404.
76. Tomlinson MJ, 1995, „Foundation Design and Construction‟, Sixth edition, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Singapore.
77. Vadivel Rajendran & Stalin, VK 2013,
„Performance assessment of cement grout by incorporating nanomaterials‟, Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Nanomaterials and Engineering Technologies, 24-26 July, Chennai. pp. 706-712.
78. Vipulanandan, C & Shenoy, S 1992,
„Properties of Cement Grouts and Grouted Sands with Additives. Proceeding of Grouting‟, Soil improvement and Geosynthetics, Volume 1, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, ASCE Feb, New Orleans Louisiana, pp. 500-511.
79. Waseim Ragab Azzam 2004, „Durability of Expansive Soil Using Advanced Nanocomposite Stabilization‟, Int. J. of Geomaterials, Sept., 2014, vol. 7, no. 1 (Sl.
No. 13), pp. 927-937, Geotech., Const. Mat. &
Env., ISSN:2186-2982(P), 2186-2990(O), Japan.
80. XRD Standard Data: www.webmineral.com.
81. Javadzadeh P., “Investigating the Effect of Nanomaterials on Resistance Parameters of Clay Soil”, Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 2019.
82. Zaid Hameed Majeed and Mohd Raihan Taha,
“Behavior of Nanomaterials in Soft Soils: A Case Study”, February 2019
83. Rahul Madathiparambil Visalakshan, Laura E. González García, Mercy R. Benzigar, Arthur Ghazaryan, Johanna Simon, Agnieszka Mierczynska-Vasilev, Thomas D.
Michl, Ajayan Vinu, Volker Mailänder, Svenja Morsbach, Katharina Landfester, and Krasimir Vasilev, “The Influence of Nanoparticle Shape on Protein Corona Formation”, Small, 2020.
84. Abbas Mohajerani, Lucas Burnett, John V.
Smith, Halenur Kurmus, John Milas, Arul Arulrajah, Suksun Horpibulsuk and Aeslina Abdul Kadir, “Nanoparticles in Construction Materials and Other Applications, and Implications of Nanoparticle Use”, Materials, September 2019.
85. Haleema Saleem and Syed Javaid Zaidi,
“Sustainable Use of Nanomaterials in Textiles and Their Environmental Impact”, Materials, November 2020.
86. Nisreen Mizher Rahmah, Khalid Mershed Owaid, “Using the Characteristic Of hybrid Mixture from Nanomaterials to Improve and Modified the Parameter of the Heat Transfer”, ICEAT, 2020.
87. Fawzi Kh. Khalaf, Hafez, M.A., Mohammed Y.
Fattah, Marwan S. Al-Shaikli, “A Review Study On The Optimizing The Performance Of
302 Soil Using Nanomaterials”, Advances In
Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM), December 2020.
88. Luca Pasquini, “Design of Nanomaterials for Hydrogen Storage”, Energies 2020, 13, 3503;
doi:10.3390/en13133503.
89. Hanliang Liu, Bimin Zhang, Xueqiu Wang, Zhixuan Han, Baoyun Zhang and Guoli Yuan,
“Application of the Fine-Grained Soil Prospecting Method in Typical Covered Terrains of Northern China”, Minerals 2021,
11, 1383.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min11121383.
90. Gang Liu, Chong Zhang, Mingzhi Zhao, Wenbo Guo and Qiang Luo, “Comparison of Nanomaterials with Other Unconventional Materials Used as Additives for Soil Improvement in the Context of Sustainable Development: A Review”, Nanomaterials
2021, 11, 15.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11010015.
91. Amit Arora, Birpal Singh, Parampreet Kaur,
“Performance of Nano-particles in stabilization of soil: a comprehensive review”, Materials Today: Proceedings 17 (2019) 124–
130.
92. Vahid Alimohammadi, Mehdi Maghfouri, Delaram Nourmohammadi, Pejman Azarsa, Rishi Gupta and Mohammad Saberian,
“Stormwater Runoff Treatment Using Pervious Concrete Modified with Various Nanomaterials: A Comprehensive Review”, Sustainability 2021, 13, 8552.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158552.
93. J. A. J. Meesters, W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg, A.
J. Hendriks, D. Van de Meent and J. T. K.
Quik, “A model sensitivity analysis to determine the most important physicochemical properties driving environmental fate and exposure of engineered nanoparticles”, Environ. Sci.:
Nano, 2019 019, 6, 2049–2060.
94. Necmi Yarbaşı, Ekrem Kalkan, “Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Fine-Grained Soils Stabilized with Waste Material Mixtures”, International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, Volume 10-Issue 1, 001 - 006, 2021, ISSN:- 2319 – 7560.
95. Abdollah Yazdi, Ebrahim Sharifi Teshnizi,
“Effects of contamination with gasoline on engineering properties of fine grained silty soils with an emphasis on the duration of exposure”, SN Applied Sciences (2021) 3:704|
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04637- x.
