• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of "

Copied!
142
0
0

Teks penuh

Stream-vegetation-sediment interactions and floodplain vegetation management can be helpful in morphological stability and ecological maintenance of rivers. The first objective refers to the investigation of the influence of natural flood vegetation grasses of different density and 400 plants/m2) in conditions of submerged vegetation. These findings provide a better understanding of the effect of the shear layer mechanism and momentum transfer in the main channel with the effect of floodplain vegetation.

Furthermore, the analysis of the turbulence statistics shows that the interaction of the main channel and the floodplain flow was well predicted.

CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF SYMBOLS

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

INTRODUCTION

GREEN CORRIDOR OF THE RIVER SYSTEM

To experimentally study the effect of the homogeneous natural green corridor on hydrodynamic properties under upwelling and submerged flow conditions in a meandering river. To study the impact of the natural vegetation patches on hydrodynamic properties under submerged flow conditions investigated in an experimental flood. Primarily, the effect of the homogeneous green corridor on a hydrodynamic system of the river is studied through experimental analysis.

This is followed by the understanding of the river turbulence characteristics with the effect of the natural vegetation patches through experimental study.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Riparian green corridor development has a significant impact on river morphodynamics and plays an important role in improving the river ecosystem (Gurnell et al., 2012). Chang et al., 1999 solved the flow equations around a bridge pier with a fixed bed and no scour using a large-eddy simulation (LES) model. Tseng et al., 2000 used LES to run a numerical simulation for square and circular pier conditions.

Flow patterns around a bridge pier with and without scour hole were modeled by Richardson et al., 1998.

FLOW IN HOMOGENEOUS GREEN RIVER CORRIDOR

The arrangement of vegetation on the floodplain has a significant influence on the flow distribution in the channel. Due to the velocity gradient and secondary circulations in the main channel, there are broad transverse shear stresses along the vegetated area (Figure 3.10 (II)). The flow angle is calculated with in the main channel to understand the variation of the velocity gradient in each layer of the flow.

The presence of high vegetation density on the river's floodplain increases the flow velocity and turbulent characteristics in the main channel.

Figure 3.1 Different experimental layouts used in the Fluvial hydro-ecological laboratory
Figure 3.1 Different experimental layouts used in the Fluvial hydro-ecological laboratory

FLOW THROUGH VEGETATION PATCHES

In the no-vegetation condition, the velocity core region is observed at the upper region of the inner bank. In the cylindrical (high crown porosity) and grass (flexible) vegetation layouts, the main channel cross section is relatively free of secondary circulation patterns. From Figure 4.7, the higher streamwise turbulence intensities can be observed for leafy vegetation from P1 (inner bank) to P10 (outer bank) in the main channel.

In the framework of vertical turbulence intensity (wrms), the state values ​​of leafy vegetation are found to be dominant over other forms of vegetation. The maximum value of Reynold's stress and turbulent intensities occur near the inflection point in the velocity profile. Due to the maximum surface area of ​​the plant it causes more flow velocity and TKE values ​​in the main channel.

This observation can be noted in this study as the measurements were taken in the main channel and underwater flow condition. The presence of highly resistant leaf cover and mixed vegetation forms supports increased velocity in the main stream. Zhang et al., 2015 reported that the higher turbulence intensity intensifies the sediment transport in the water flow.

In the present study, an analysis of laboratory experiments was conducted to investigate the effect of submerged heterogeneous vegetation patches on the flow structure. This indicates that the shear layer occupies the relatively larger part in the main channel of the leafy vegetation than the cylindrical vegetation.

Figure 4.1 Riparian green corridor along the river bank system
Figure 4.1 Riparian green corridor along the river bank system

COMBINED EFFECT OF BRIDGE PIERS AND FLOODPLAIN VEGETATION ON MAIN

CHANNEL HYDRAULICS

This indicates that the flow develops strong movements inside the main channel as the flood flow approaches the bridge pier. In the case of single-bridge pier conditions (2 in. ϕ), the length of the higher-velocity region is greater and the lower-velocity region is less, while in the smaller-diameter double piers (1 inch ϕ each), the length of the velocity zones is opposite. This may be due to the increased turbulence created due to the bridge pier in the main channel.

The comparative analysis of turbulence intensity in the main channel revealed significantly higher values ​​in the channel influenced by combined effect of bridge pier and vegetation. The magnitude of TKE within the shear layer (Figure 5.8 (I)) weakens, as shown in figure 5.4 (I), the merged isosheets between the low-velocity region near the outer bank for current velocities. According to the figure, observed, the combined effect of bridge pier and floodplain vegetation reflects in TKE at each location.

This section discusses the combined effect of bridge pier diameter and floodplain vegetation on the main channel flow structures of a channel with low sinuous composition. This indicates that the large diameter of the single bridge pier condition causes more turbulence in the channel. As shown in Figure 5.4 (I) the isowells cluster between the low-velocity region near the outer bank for downstream velocities.

In this study, the combined effect of the bridge pier and floodplain vegetation on the turbulence parameters of the main channel was investigated. The main observations in the study lead to the following conclusions. i) The presence of a single large-diameter jetty with floodplain vegetation increases the velocity of the main channel by up to 36% compared to the absence of floodplain obstructions.

Figure 5.5 (I), shows the secondary flow patterns in the main channel influenced  by bridge pier diameter and flood-plain vegetation
Figure 5.5 (I), shows the secondary flow patterns in the main channel influenced by bridge pier diameter and flood-plain vegetation

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF EFFECT OF GREEN CORRIDOR AND BRIDGE PIERS

ON RIVER TURBULENCE

From the results, the average streamwise velocities at the top section in the simulated data (Usim = 0.17m/s) were about 1.2 times of the experimental result (Uexp = 0.14m/s). The secondary flow structure is well defined in the simulated case at the tip section. Moreover, a weak main channel eddy in the no-vegetated condition at top section is visible throughout the channel for the experimental plot (Figure 6.6(I)).

Based on the results, the average streamwise velocities in the simulated data (Usim = 0.32m/s) were approx. 1.5 times of the experimental result (Uexp = 0.2m/s). In Figure 6.9, the secondary flow structure is well defined in the simulated at the apex section is observed. In Figure 6.8 (II), as z/h < 0.75, the apparent effect of secondary cell circulation in the main channel increased significantly in the simulated condition.

According to the results, the average lateral velocities in the simulated data (Usim = 0.33 m/s) were about 1.32 times larger than the experimental result (Uexp = 0.25 m/s). In addition, the experimental plot shows a larger range of the vegetated state vortex with one pier surrounding the vegetated state at the top for the region between (0.5 ≤ Y / h ≤ 3.5) (Figure 6.15(I)). According to the results, the average transverse velocities in the simulated data (Usim = 0.3 m/s) were about 1.3 times larger than the experimental result (Uexp = 0.23 m/s).

The longitudinal vorticity on the outer bank is visible due to the curvature effect shown in the experimental and simulated results. In the above figures, the characterization of the shear layer (i.e., the width of the shear layer) due to the velocity gradients induced by the main channel and the varying severity of the flood field results in the formation of secondary eddies, and this effect is significantly implicated in other turbulence parameters in the channel.

Table 6.1: Summary of the experiments with and without floodplain vegetation
Table 6.1: Summary of the experiments with and without floodplain vegetation

SUMMARY AND FUTURE SCOPE

A strong velocity gradient is observed in the scenario with high vegetation density, i.e. 400 plants/m2 due to the diversion of flow from the floodplain to the main channel, which resulted in a 23% increase in the velocity of the main channel compared to the scenario without vegetation. This indicates that the arrangement of vegetation on the floodplain has a significant influence on the flow distribution in the channel. Furthermore, this core area is located deeper in the main channel, which may be due to the larger area occupied by the higher vegetation density compared to other vegetation configurations.

The findings showed that the floodplain vegetation affects the Reynold's shear stresses in the main channel, producing strong lateral shear stresses at a higher floodplain flow depth condition. Second, in the case of leaf vegetation, the reduction in velocity in the channel from P1 (inner bank) to P10 (outer bank) is observed to be 51% at vegetation leaf height. In the single pier with larger diameter, the length of the vortex is more and its strength is 2 times more than double pier with smaller diameter.

The percentage increase in streamwise turbulence intensity (urm) in the main channel for different cases is 22% more for vegetation only, 37% more for double pier with vegetation and 40% more for single pier with vegetation compared to no vegetation condition. This is due to the strong shear flow in the channel with the effect of bridge piers surrounded by vegetation. The hydraulic parameters such as primary and secondary flow rates and turbulent kinetic energy behavior in the main channel were analyzed by FLOW3D solver using RNG turbulence model.

The mean streamwise velocities in the no-vegetation condition at the top section, the simulated data were approx. 1.2 times of the experimental result. The secondary flow circulations in the simulated case in the single pier surrounding vegetated state at the top section at the outer bank (2 ≤ Y / h ≤ 5) are noticeable.

APPENDIX A

PUBLICATIONS

APPENDIX B

HOMOGENEOUS GREEN CORRIDOR- EMERGENT CONDITION

In Proceedings of the 1999 International Water Resources Engineering Conference, August, Session BS-05, Water Resources Publications, LLC, Highlands Ranch, CO. Quasi-three-dimensional numerical model for flow through flexible, rigid, submerged and non-submerged vegetation. Three-layer model for vertical velocity distribution in open channel flow with submerged stiff vegetation.

Turbulence modeling of complex open-channel flows with and without vegetation in the floodplain using the Reynolds stress model. An investigation of flow and scour mechanisms around isolated sprinklers in a shallow open channel: 1. Flow characteristics at different densities of submerged flexible vegetation from a study of open artificial plant flow channels.

Flow resistance of single-line emergent vegetation along the floodplain edge of a complex open channel.

Gambar

Figure 3.1 Different experimental layouts used in the Fluvial hydro-ecological laboratory
Figure 3.4 Schematic diagram of secondary flow in the experimental channel
Figure 3.6 Normalized contour plots of streamwise velocities  (u/u * )  for the relative flow  depths (I) D r =0.27 and (II) D r =0.43 of apex section (CS1) a) 400 plants/m 2    b) 200
Figure 3.7 Secondary velocity plots for the flow depth of 14 cm (D r  = 0.43) vegetation with  different densities and non-vegetated condition at a) apex section (CS1); b) bend section
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Currently, local communities in Soppeng District are building small-scale adaptation strategies based on learned experiences and previous flood events.. Therefore,