• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Tribunal holds that preference share capital should be included in total liabilities for valuing unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Tribunal holds that preference share capital should be included in total liabilities for valuing unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Tax Insights

from India Tax & Regulatory Services

www.pwc.in

Tribunal holds that preference

share capital should be included in total liabilities for valuing

unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA

January 9, 2020

In brief

Recently, the Delhi bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal)1 held that while arriving at the fair market value (FMV) of unquoted equity shares under Rule 11UA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (Rules) preference share capital should be included in the total liability of the company. The Tribunal clarified that preference shares were non-convertible, non-cumulative and redeemable; thus, the company was liable to pay this amount to its preference shareholders.

In detail

Facts

• During the financial year (FY ) 2013-2014, the taxpayer sold shares in A Co. The taxpayer offered gains on sale of such shares as long-term capital gains.

• The Delhi co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in case of the husband of the taxpayer, on identical facts of the case, upheld that the consideration needs to be determined considering FMV of underlying shares and by applying the computation formula provided under Rule 11UA of the Rules.

• The Tax Officer (TO) computed the consideration on the basis of underlying

1 ITA No. 2172/Del/2018

shares and arrived at a v aluation of each share of A Co.

• On appeal, the

Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals) directed the TO to re-compute the capital gain at a v alue per share that was accepted by the co-ordinate bench in case of the husband of the taxpayer with similar facts.

Issues before the Tribunal Whether redeemable

preference shares have to be deducted as liability under the provisions of Rule 11UA of the Rules?

Taxpayer’s contentions

• The Revenue’s workings of the share valuation of A Co.

under Rule 11UA of the

Rules had many inaccuracies/ errors.

• The computation submitted by the TO contained several errors, as he did not take the correct v alue of the assets, nor did it properly record the liability of intermediary companies, and neither did it consider preference share capital as a liability. This resulted in the adoption of an incorrect v aluation per share without any further verification.

Further, the Delhi coordinate bench of the Tribunal did not examine whether the computation met the norms specified by the said Rule.

Revenue’s contention Once the taxpayer has

(2)

Tax Insights

2 pwc

accepted the FMV per share as in the case of the taxpayer’s husband, the same cannot be now challenged on an identical issue.

Tribunal’s ruling The v alue per share

determined by the learned TO, by adopting Rule 11 UA of the Rules, suffers from at least one basic fallacy.

• As per Rule 11UA of the Rules, only the sum of paid-up equity share capital and reserves are not required to be included in the book value of liabilities shown in the balance sheet.

Therefore, its natural corollary is that paid-up capital for preference shares issued by the company is required to be included in the total liability of the company.

• The preference shares are non- convertible, non-cumulative

preference shares, which are redeemable. Thus, the company has a liability to pay the preference share capital to the preference shareholders before anything is paid to the equity shareholders.

• This is the mandate of Rule 11 UA of the Rules, to consider while valuing equity shares of an unlisted entity, to include preference share capital in total liability of the company and to exclude only paid up v alue of equity share capital issued and free reserve. This sum of liability is required to be reduced from the total assets of the company, then only the net book v alue assets representing book value of equity shares of that company can be derived.

• Moreover, in the balance sheet of the company, the equity share capital can be valued

only by excluding the paid-up equity share capital and free reserves, which can be distributed to the equity shareholders.

• The TO is directed to correct the v aluation by including the v alue of preference share capital in the total liabilities.

Such total liability is to be reduced from the total assets to derive the value of equity shares.

The takeaways

This case confirms that preference shares are to be deducted as part of liabilities while calculating the v alue of equity shares as per Rule 11UA of the Rules.

Let’s talk

For a deeper discussion of how this issue might affect your business, please contact your local PwC advisor

(3)

Tax Insights

For priv ate circulation only

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwCPL, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. Without prior permission of PwCPL, this publication may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents.

© 2020 PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited liability company in India hav ing Corporate Identity Number or CIN : U74140WB1983PTC036093), which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL), each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.

About PwC

At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with over 276,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services.

Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.

In India, PwC has offices in these cities: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune and Raipur. For more information about PwC India’s service offerings, visit www.pwc.in

PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

© 2020 PwC. All rights reserved

Follow us on:

Our Offices

Ahmedabad Bengaluru Chennai

1701, 17th Floor, Shapath V, Opp. Karnavati Club, S G Highway,

Ahmedabad – 380051 Gujarat

+91-79 3091 7000

6th Floor

Millenia Tower ‘D’

1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru – 560 008 Karnataka

+91-80 4079 7000

8th Floor

Prestige Palladium Bayan 129-140 Greams Road Chennai – 600 006 Tamil Nadu +91 44 4228 5000

Hyderabad Kolkata Mumbai

Plot no. 77/A, 8-2-624/A/1, 4th Floor, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hy derabad – 500034

Telangana

+91-40 44246000

56 & 57, Block DN.

Ground Floor, A- Wing Sector - V, Salt Lake Kolkata – 700 091 West Bengal

+91-033 2357 9101/

4400 1111

PwC House Plot No. 18A,

Guru Nanak Road(Station Road), Bandra (West), Mumbai – 400 050 Maharashtra

+91-22 6689 1000

Gurgaon Pune For more information

Building No. 10, Tower - C 17th & 18th Floor,

DLF Cy ber City, Gurgaon – 122002 Hary ana

+91-124 330 6000

7 th Floor, Tower A - Wing 1, Business Bay, Airport Road, Y erwada, Pune – 411 006 Maharashtra

+91-20 4100 4444

Contact us at

[email protected]

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

www.pwc.in Tax Insights from India Tax & Regulatory Services Tribunal holds section 50D applies where land transferred under a JDA; rejects adoption of future cost of

Tax Insights from India Tax & Regulatory Services www.pwc.in Tribunal holds that TO cannot tinker with prescribed valuation method adopted by taxpayer for computation under

Tax Insights from India Tax & Regulatory Services www.pwc.in Tribunal holds section 79 not applicable where the shareholder continues to hold 100%, although partly indirectly,

Tax Insights from India Tax & Regulatory Services www.pwc.in Supreme Court holds that a separate agreement for non compete fee, on facts, not sham; not taxable as part of

Tax Insights from India Tax & Regulatory Services www.pwc.in Tribunal holds that provisions of section 562viib not applicable where the company had only closely related