46
.
DATA ETHICS AND ITS ROLE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Mishika Garg
Computer Science Engineering, Acropolis Technical Campus
Abstract- Data collection from participants is not necessarily a feature of research. The regular management information system, as well as other surveys and testing programmes, gather a large volume of data. Current data may be studied to come up with fresh hypotheses to have answers to important study questions. This conserves significant amount of time, manpower, and other capital. Digital Ethics expand son the frame work set down by Computer and Software Ethics while also refining the methodology previously endorsed in this area by moving the Level in Abstraction of ethical investigations from information-centric to data-centric. Data Ethics will have the solutions that will maximize Data Science's importance for our economies, for all of us, and for our ecosystems. The objective of this topic is to establish data Ethics as a modern area of ethics that studies and analyses moral issues involving data. It emphasizes the importance of concentrating ethical analyses on the substance and essence of computing operations.
Keywords: Data Ethics, Data Science, Ethics of Data, Ethics of Algorithms, Ethics of Practises, Levels of Abstraction.
1 INTRODUCTION
Data science opens up a plethora of possibilities for improving both private and public life, as well as our surroundings consider the development of smart cities or the problems caused by carbon emission. Unfortunately, those rewards come with considerable legal implications. The growing emphasis on algorithms to analyse data in order to form choices and make decisions
containing machine learning, AI, and robotics as well as the increment a reduction of human intervention. These ethical issues should be successfully tackled. Fostering the growth and applications of Data Science while upholding human rights and the ideals that shape free, pluralistic, and inclusive knowledge communities is a tremendous opportunity that we can and must seize
Figure 1 Source https://calvin-tech.net/DS8660_Module4 It will not be quick or convenient to
strike such a robust balance. However, the choice, failing to advance both data ethics and research, would have disastrous consequences. On the one hand, over looking ethical issues may prompt negative impact and social rejection, because it was the case, for instance, of the NHS care data programme. Social acceptability or, even better, social prefer ability must be the
guiding principles for any Data Science project with even a foreign impact on human life, to make sure that opportunities won't be missed. On the opposite hand, overemphasizing the protection of individual rights within the wrong contexts may cause regulations that are too rigid, and this successively can cripple the probabilities to harness the social value of knowledge Science.
47 In achieving this task, Data Ethics
can repose on the inspiration provided by Computer and knowledge Ethics, which has focused for the past thirty years on the most challenges posed by digital technologies (Floridi 2013; Bynum 2015; Miller and Taddeo 2017). This rich legacy is most precious. It also fruitfully grafts Data Ethics onto the good tradition of ethics more generally. At an equivalent time, Data Ethics refines the approach endorsed thus far in Computer and knowledge Ethics, because it changes the amount of Abstraction (LoA) of ethical enquiries from an information- centric (LoAI) to a data-centric one(LoAD).
1.1 Definitions of Data Ethics:
Kathy Rondon: ―Data mind fullness‖
guiding the ethical use of data within all organizations.)
Tech Crunch: ―A specialized area of Data Governance and Stewardship‖
where data can be
Phys. org: ―productionalized and, in large part, automated through the use of good tooling.‖ Not only moral guidance as to ―what data should be
collected and how it should be used,‖
but also ―who gets to make those decisions in the first place.
Bright Hive: ―A code of conduct or ethics for Data Scientists, similar to the purpose of the Hippocratic Oath in guiding medical professionals.
Forbes: ―Code guiding Data Scientists‘ behaviors, to ―better human society.‖
2 LITERATURE ON ETHICAL ANALYSES Ethical studies are generate data variety of levels of abstraction (LoAs). The transition from LoAI to LoAD is the most recent in a sequence of shifts that have marked the progression of computer and information ethics. In this area, research first supported a human-centric LoA (Parker1968), which discussed the philosophical issues raised by the widespread use of machines in terms of both designers' and users' professional obligations. The LoA then shifted to a computer-centric one (LoAC) within the mid 1980s (Moor 1985), and it changed again at the start of the second millennium to LoAI (Floridi2006).
Figure 2 Source UC San Diego Research Ethics Program Data In this area, research first
supported a human-centric LoA (Parker 1968), which discussed the philosophical issues raised by the widespread use of computers. Rapid, widespread, and profound technical transformations became possible as a result of these developments. As well as the fact that they have significant philosophical ramifications. LoAC, for example, emphasised computers' versatility as universal and malleable instruments. It made it easier to know the impact that computers could we reshaping social
dynamics also as on the planning of the environment surrounding us (Moor 1985). LoAI then shifted its emphasis away from technological means and toward the content (information) that will be produced, collected, processed, and shared through them. In doing so, LoAI emphasised the various moral dimensions of information—i.e., information because the source, In this area, study first promoted a human- centric LoA (Parker 1968), which addressed the ethical concerns posed by widespread software usage in terms of
48 both designers' and users' professional
responsibilities. As a consequence, or the goal of ethical actions—and led to the preparation of a macro ethical approach ready to address the entire cycle of data processing, distribution, preservation, and security—and led to the planning of a macro ethical approach ready to address the entire cycle of data creation, sharing, storage, and protection.
3 ETHICS OF DATA FOCUSES ON ETHICAL PROBLEMS
The ethics of information focuses on ethical questions raised by the collection and study of large datasets, ranging from the use of vast data in biomedical research and social sciences (Mittelstadt and Floridi 2015), to sampling, ads (Hildebrandt 2008), and data philanthropy (Kirkpatrick 2013; Taddeo forthcoming), as well as open data (Kirkpatrick 2013; Taddeo forthcoming) (Kitchin 2014). during this context, key issues concern possible re-identification
of people through datamining, linking, merging, and reusing of huge datasets, also as risks for so-called ―group privacy‖, when the identification of sorts of individuals, independently ofthe de- identification of every of them, may cause serious ethical problems, from group discrimination (e.g. ageism, ethnicism, sexism) to group-targeted sorts of violence (Floridi 2014; Taylor, Floridi, and van der Sloot Forthcoming).
(Taddeo 2010; Taddeo and Floridi 2011) and transparency (Turilli and Floridi 2009) also are crucial topics within the ethics of knowledge , in reference to an acknowledged lack of public awareness of the advantages , opportunities, risks, and challenges related to Data Science (Drew forthcoming). For example transparency is usually advocated together of the measures which will foster trust. However, it's unclear what information should be made transparent and to whom information should be disclosed.
Figure 3 Farouq Ayiworoh Ethics in Qualitative Research diagram The ethics of algorithms
addresses concerns raised by the increasing complexity and autonomy of algorithms in general (including AI and artificial agents such as internet bots), especially in machine learning applications. Moral obligation and transparency to all programmers and data scientists with regard to unintended and undesired results, as well as missing opportunities, are some critical obstacles in this scenario (Floridi 2012; Floridi forthcoming). Unsurprisingly, moral architecture and auditing (Goodman and Flaxman 2016) of algorithm criteria, as well as the estimation of possible, negative consequences (e.g., bigotry or the propagation of anti-social content),
are attracting further study.
4 CONCLUSION
Data Ethics must address the entire conceptual space and hence all the three axes of research together, albeit with different priorities and focus. And for this reason, Data Ethics must be developed from the beginning as macro ethics, which is, as an overall ―geometry‖
of the moral space that avoids narrow, unplanned approaches but rather addresses the various set of ethical implications of knowledge Science within a uniform, holistic, and inclusive framework. The goal of this theme topic is to establish Data Ethics as a modern division of ethics that studies and
49 evaluates moral problems related to
data, including data creation, storage, curation, processing, distribution, exchange, and usage, algorithms, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics, and corresponding activities. Data Ethics should be built as a macro ethics from the outset, avoiding small, ad hoc approaches and addressing the ethical effect and consequences of Data Science and its implementation sin coherent, systematic, and comprehensive context.
REFERENCES
1. Archiving Qualitative Data 2009: Prospects and Challenges of Data Preservation and Sharing among Australian Qualitative Researchers.
Institute for Social Science Research, the University of Queensland, Available at:
http://www.assda.edu.au/forms/AQuAQualitat iveArchiving_DiscussionPaper_ FinalNov09.pdf (Last accessed 05 September2013
2. Bynum, Terrell. 2015. ―Computer and Information Ethics.‖ In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2015.
3. Drew, Cat. Forth coming. ―Data Science Ethics in Governmen.‖Philosophical Transactions A.
4. https://www.ayiworoh/farouq-ayiworoh-ethics- in-qualitative-research.
5. Fielding NG, Fielding JL (2003). Resistance and adaptation to criminal identity: Using secondary analysis to evaluate classic studies of crime and deviance. Sociology, 34(4): 671-89.
6. Floridi, Luciano. 2006. ―Information Ethics, Its Nature and Scope.‖SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 36 3):
21–36. doi:10.1145/1195716.1195719.
7. Floridi, Luciano. 2008. ―The Method of Levels of Abstraction.‖ Minds and Machines 18 (3): 303–
doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9113-7.
8. Floridi, Luciano. 2012. ―Distributed Morality in an Information Society.‖ Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 727–43. doi:
10.1007/s11948-012-9413-4.
9. Floridi, Luciano. 2013. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Floridi, Luciano .2014. ―Open Data, Data Protection, and Group Privacy.‖ Philosophy &
Technology (1): 1–3. Doi: 10.1007/s13347-014- 0157-8.
11. Goodman, Bryce, and Seth Flaxman. 2016.
―European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and A ‗right to Explanation.‘‖
arXiv: 1606.08813 [Cs, Stat], June.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813.
12. Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2008. ―Profiling and the Identity of the European Citizen.‖In Profiling the European Citizen, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt and Serge Gut wirth, 303–43. Springer Netherlands.
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978 -1-4020-6914-7_15.
13. Hoare, C. A. R. 1972. ―Structured
Programming.‖ In, edited by O. J. Dahl, E. W.
Dijkstra, and C. A. R. Hoare, 83–174. London, UK, UK: Academic Press Ltd.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1243380.124 3382.
14. Kirkpatrick, Robert. 2013. ―A New Type of Philanthropy: Donating Data.‖Harvard Business Review. March 21. https://hbr.org/2013/03/a- new-type-of-philanthropy-don.
15. Kitch in, Rob. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. SAGE.
16. Leonelli, Sabina. Forthcoming. ―Locating Ethics in Data Science: Responsibility and Accountability in Global and Distributed Knowledge Production Systems.‖ Philosophical Transactions A.
17. Miller, Keith, and Mariarosaria Taddeo, eds.
2017. The Ethics of Information Technologies.
Library of Essays on the Ethics of Emerging Technologies. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY:
Routledge.
18. Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, and Luciano Floridi.
2015. ―The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.‖
Science and Engineering Ethics, May.doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2.
19. Moor, James H. 1985. ―What Is Computer Ethics?*.‖ Metaphilosophy 16 (4): 266– 75.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x.
20. Parker, Donn B. 1968. ―Rules of Ethics in Information Processing.‖ Communications of
the ACM 11 (3): 198–201.
doi:10.1145/362929.362987. Statement of Ethical Practice for the Brit-ish Sociological Association 2004. The British Sociological Association, Durh-am. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/media/aboutthe.
21. Szabo V, Strang VR (1997). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2):66-74.
22. Taddeo, Mariarosaria. For thcoming. ―Data Philanthropy and The Design of The In fraethics for Information Societies.‖
Philosophical Transactions A.
23. Taddeo, Mariarosaria. 2010. ―Trust in Technology: A Distinctive and a Problematic Relation.‖ Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23(3–4):283–86.doi:10.1007/s12130-010- 9113- 9.
24. Taddeo, Mariarosaria, and Luciano Floridi.
2011. ―The Case for E-Trust.‖ Ethics and Information Technology 13 (1): 1–
3.doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9263-1.
25. Taylor, Linnet, Luciano Floridi, and Bart van der Sloot, eds. Forthcoming. Group Privacy:
New Challenges of Data Technologies.
Hildenberg: Philosophical Studies, Book Series, Springer.
26. Turilli, Matteo, and Luciano Floridi. 2009.
―The Ethics of Information Transparency.‖
Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):
105–12. doi:10.1007/s10676-009- 9187-9.
27. Vayena, Effy, and John Tasioulas.
Forthcoming. ―The Dynamics of Big Data and Human Rights: The Case of Scientific Research.‖ Philosophical Transactions A.
