ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (ISSN NO. 2456-1037) Vol.03, Issue 09, Conference (IC-RASEM) Special Issue 01, September 2018 Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE
1
CHARACTERIZATION OF GENERALIZED NEGABENT FUNCTIONS Rashmeet Kaur1
Department of Mathematics , National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Raipur, 492010, Chhattisgarh, India
Deepmala Sharma2
Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Raipur, 492010, Chhattisgarh, India
Abstract In this article, we study generalized negabent Boolean functions from . We present characterization of generalized negabent Boolean functions in terms of negabent functions. The results are analogous to generalized bent functions.
1 INTRODUCTION
Boolean bent functions introduced by Rothaus [4] serves as an important combinatorial objects having wide range of applications in coding theory, the difference set theory, and cryptography.
Even though, the researchers have obtained few classes of bent functions, their complete characterization is still difficult. On the other hand, researchers have focused on generalization of Boolean functions which was introduced much later in [7]. Schmidt [2] considered the function from and these functions have drawn more attention. In [3] Pott and Parker introduced negabent functions by considering the nega hadamard transform. Negabent functions have flat spectra under nega hadamard transform. The functions which are both bent and negabent are called bent- negabent functions. The generalization of negabent function is called generalized negabent function [1]. Generalized negabent functions are the functions having flat spectrum with respect to generalized nega hadamard transform.
In this article, we study generalized negabent function and present characterization of generalized negabent functions on Further we give a construction of generalized negabent functions on
2 PRELIMINARIES
We denote the set of integers by Z and Zr represents the ring of integers modulo r.
The addition over Z is represented by +, whereas ⊕ represents the addition over Boolean function is a function
from where is an n-
dimensional vector space over The set of all n-variable Boolean functions is denoted by Bn. Support of a Boolean is
defined by The
Hamming weight of a Boolean function is defined by the set The Hamming distance between two Boolean functions is defined by the set The Algebraic Normal form of a Boolean function is defined as
where
The algebraic degree of f is defined by the number of variables in highest order monomial with non-zero coefficient.
Affine Boolean functions are the functions with algebraic degree at most one. The set of all n-variable affine Boolean functions is denoted by If the constant term of affine Boolean function is zero, then it is called linear Boolean function
If and
are in then the scalar product is defined by
The Walsh transform of f at any point is defined by
A Boolean function with n even is said to be a bent function if and only if
for all
Generalized Boolean function on n- variables is defined as a function from
a positive integer) [5]. The set of all n-variable generalized Boolean function is denoted by
ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (ISSN NO. 2456-1037) Vol.03, Issue 09, Conference (IC-RASEM) Special Issue 01, September 2018 Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE
2 The generalized walsh hadamard transform of at any point u is defined by
where is the q-th primitive root of unity
A function is said to be generalized bent function if
The nega hadamard transform of f at is given by
A function f is said to be negabent if and only if
The generalized nega hadamard transform of any Boolean function f at any point u is defined by
A Boolean function
for all is said to be a generalized negabent function.
3 RESULTS ON GENERALIZED NEGABENT FUNCTIONS
In this section, we present some results on characterization of generalized negabent functions.
Theorem 1.
then
roof. We compute
Now, by puttin
we get
we may rewrite this equality
Theorem 2
then
Proof. We compute
)
Now, by putting
and
we obtain
ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (ISSN NO. 2456-1037) Vol.03, Issue 09, Conference (IC-RASEM) Special Issue 01, September 2018 Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE
3 from which we derive our resu
Theorem 3 Z be
defined
Proof. We compute generalized nega- hadamard coefficie
Now, by taking square of norm, we obain
Since and ⊕ r
are all negabent functio
By using imposed conditions, the remaining coefficients are all zero
So, f is generalized negabent function n.
4 CONCLUSION
In this article, we have presented results on characterization of generalized negabent functions defined . Moreover, we present a construction of generalized negabent function
REFERENCES
1. Chaturvedi and A. K. Gangopadhyay, ”On Generalized NegaHadamard Transform,” in Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness in Heterogeneous Networks (Lectures Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunication Engineering), vol. 115, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp.
771-777.
2. K. Schmidt, ”Quaternary constant- amplitude codes for multicode CDMA,”
IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, vol. 55, no. 4, pp.
1824-1832, 2009.
3. M. G. Parker and A. Pott, ”On Boolean functions which are bent and negabent,” in Sequences, Subsequences, and Consequences (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 4893. Berlin, Germany:
Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 9-23.
4. O. S. Rothaus, ”On bent functions,” J.
Combinat. Theory, Ser. A, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 300-305, 1976.
5. P. Sole and N. Tokareva, ”Connections between quaternary and binary bent functions,”
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/544.pdf, 6. P. Stanica, T. Martin, S. Gangopadhyay
and B. K. Singh, ”Bent and generalized bent Boolean functions,” Des. Codes Cryptogr., vol. 69, pp. 77-94, 2013.
7. P.V Kumar, R.A Scholtz and L.R Welch,
”Generalized bent functions and their properties,” J. Combinat. Theory, Ser. A, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 90- 107, 1985.