227 RECENT STUDY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING FOR SOIL STABILIZATION WITH WOOD ASH:
A REVIEW Rakesh Kumar Bairwa
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.)
Prof. Rajesh JoshiRajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.)
Abstract -
The quick expansion in urbanization, mechanical advancement in the development business and globalization of the economy requests different structural designing designs and office administrations in accessible regions. These days, the development exercises on hazardous soils are inescapable overall in view of shortage of accessible land with sound soil. Subsequently, in the greater part of the structural designing works, it was difficult to choose a reasonable region which can fulfill the plan needs with next to no correction in earth. Hence the measures of plan and developing the designs in regular delicate ground have expanded immensely and it needs appropriate consideration.
Among the different sorts the dangerous soils are greater part of delicate mud and peat stores which have high compressibility and volumetric changes. Hence to use even such soils including feeble stores, adjustment methods can be utilized. Soil adjustment by admixture is one of the customary and prudent strategies primarily to work on the geotechnical properties of tricky soils. It is fundamental to work on the strength and sturdiness of soil by locally accessible or unreasonably bountiful material to ad lib soil layer. A choice of reasonable adjustment procedure should be embraced for various destinations, since the way of behaving, nature and properties of soils accessible in various areas are changing to a great extent.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General
The mechanical improvement in the development business, globalization of the economy, expanded unfamiliar direct speculations; all has moved the infrastructural advancement in the country. Mostly, quick expansion in urbanization requests different structural designing designs and office administrations in accessible regions.
These days, the development exercises on hazardous soils is unavoidable overall due to shortage of accessible land with sound soil. In this manner, building destinations because of unfortunate soil qualities has been radically expanded and these regions were broadened for the most part with dirts and natural soils. The rules of plan and developing the designs in normal delicate ground have expanded colossally and it needs legitimate consideration. Subsequently, in the greater part of the structural designing works, it is difficult to choose a reasonable region which can satisfy the plan needs with next to no correction in earth.
While considering the regular soils which are ordinarily portrayed by low strength and high compressibility trademark expects all things considered care. Thus, the advancement on such soils results in extreme geohazards including over the top settlement for the designs. Expectedly, the answer for the issues in soils was taking on the technique for supplanting low strength soil stores by designing fill. Later on it was demonstrated that various strategies are appropriate for fluctuating attributes of soil and the entire idea was sorted as ground improvement techniques.
1.2 Objective and Scope of Study
In view of the synthetic adjustment
techniques, that far is accounted for as
the better appropriateness in attachment
less and durable soils. In this
examination, adjustment of broad soil
should be possible by utilizing a modern
and agrowaste in powerless soils
recommending a manageable strategy of
ground improvement. This work gives
conspicuousness with the impact of waste
228
materials with mud soil particles to work
on its solidarity. In light of the geotechnical contemplations in soil adjustment, the targets determined for this study are follows:
To concentrate because of stabilizer focuses on strength properties and swell attributes of soil tests.
To concentrate because of restoring time of treated soil on strength qualities.
To break down the microstructure of soil tests to grasp the impact on progress in strength properties of soil.
To examine the untreated and treated soil tests to grasp the development of synthetic organization.
To concentrate on the freeze and defrost properties and pH upsides of soil balanced out with the Industrial and Agro squander.
To research the impacts of stabilizer (Industrial and Agro squander) in soil tests on the strength properties in their settled structures.
Subsequently, the current review is to complete a plausibility concentrate on that includes in the use of waste materials to improve the qualities of broad soil. The dirt utilized in this study is hazardous in nature, having high compressibility with high volume changing qualities and lesser bearing limits. In light of the exploratory examinations did and necessities in soil attributes, a methodology of using the modern and agro squanders in soil adjustment are distinguished and confirmed with the trial results with a portion of the current ideas and studies.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 General
Normal soil is composite and complex naturally. Having different materialistic properties and different piece of materials, minerals and supplements is proportioned. Various kinds of soil have various properties and trademark highlights. Among the different sorts, the tricky soils are greater part of delicate dirt
and peat stores which have high compressibility and volumetric changes.
Mud soil are significantly thought to be as folding or dangerous soils when they are exceptionally porous and feeble.
Hereafter, to use even such soils including powerless stores, adjustment methods can be utilized. Soil adjustment by admixture is one of the conventional and practical techniques fundamentally to work on the geotechnical properties of tricky soils. It is fundamental to work on the strength and sturdiness of soil by locally accessible or exorbitantly plentiful material to ad lib soil layer. A choice of reasonable adjustment procedure should be embraced for various destinations, since the way of behaving, nature and properties of soils accessible in various areas are fluctuating to a great extent .The dirt change or adjustment strategy changes primarily the strength, compressibility and pressure driven conductivity qualities of tricky soils.
To the more noteworthy
practicality and openness in the field of
geotechnical designing, at whatever point
and any place the issue experiences, it is
difficult to uncover and change the whole
soil foundation to a few meters of
profundity since it is viewed as
uneconomical. To acquire the progression
of mechanical turns of events and
different receptions to the most current
developments in this field it has went with
to numerous headways in ground
improvement methods. The dirt
adjustment process from the previous
history has been created from utilizing
cotton, fiber vegetation to the advanced
time of utilizing exceptional half breed
polymers. The consequence of soil
adjustment ought to accomplish high
strength as far as longer term which is
alluded as solidness of the dirt balanced
out. A few admixtures require successive
support while different admixtures might
require satisfactory substitutions. Type
and nature of admixture relies upon the
sort of treatment expected to that specific
kind of soil. Antiquated time had the
chance of trading comparative property
soil for building locales by shipment of
materials from accessible region. Later on
observing soil of comparable property
kept on being difficulty where by then
229
balancing out it with in-situ soil became
dominating. Then beginning from involving in-situ soil, sand, normal fiber, and so on, many stages moved down including modern waste, half breed admixtures, lingering remains.
2.2 Components of Stabilization
The dirt adjustment targets working on the attributes of feeble soils by the improvement in holding of soil particles in presence of dampness. The parts of adjustment innovation of cooperation between the strong minerals in soils as well as strong minerals and settling specialists. While contrasting the dirt improvement of different soils, granular materials are the simplest to get settled since it has huge surface region. Indeed, even in fine grained clayey soils it very well may be adjusted as soil adjustment because of its huge surface region due to its lengthened molecule surface. The presence of natural matters additionally works with the dirt soil to get improved during the adjustment cycle by its high trade limit of particles with water atoms by holding the calcium particles for soil alteration. In such kind of soils, the fruitful adjustment additionally relies upon the stabilizer which are included specific measurements.
2.3. Methods of Soil Stabilization
The primary idea of adjustment is to improve materials found in development regions with solid sub grade soil in different fields. Taking on soil adjustment strategy to any site includes really looking at different boundaries to make the cycle doable. To support the fitting and reasonable admixture it is fundamental for check the site condition, kind of soil and the bearing layer, accessibility of hardware's and work, sort of construction and the assessed load determined, investigation of stacking history, nearby accessibility of admixture and cost assessment. The technique for adjustment can be changed by necessities and various strategies are taking on to further develop the dirt subgrades for shifting designs, for example, banks, establishment soils, asphalts, landing strip runways and so on [15,16]. It is fundamental to consider the condition
and nature of the normal soil foundation before the development cycle. A portion of the properties to be made do by soil adjustment process are penetrability and void proportion, shear strength and compressibility conduct.
Soil adjustment ought to likewise be completed in designing viewpoints and can be trailed by different philosophies of overcharge stacking, concentrating on the instances of history of destinations with past, present and future stacking, can offer the help to remain close by raising stone, lime segments, grouting, influence stacking, vibrations and so forth. The course of ground improvement ought to likewise include bearing strength of the comparing soil, water maintenance at the specific site, to diminish the probabilities of complete or halfway settlement of the design. The settlement of soil happens at the stage where the dirt displays lesser bearing limit and the higher compressibility.
Adjustment of soil is completed by two strategies; by expanding strength and bearing limit of soil layer without expansion of any admixtures might be including mechanical adjustment and further developing soil physical and synthetic properties by expansion of any admixture.
2.3.1 Mechanical Stabilization
Mechanical strategies for adjustment incorporate actual cycles, for example, soil densification by field compaction, utilization of fortifications as geogrids mixes with the dirt. The sorts of materials used to settle the dirts relying on the expense, kind of design to be developed and furthermore the dirt conditions[17,18]. Mechanical soil adjustment process including settling soil either truly by heap driving, laying of stone sections, lime segments, raising backings to remain close by of the design, vibrations, pre-stacking, overcharge, setting of channels, compaction by different gear's, densification process and so on.,
In an investigation of soil
improvement with a planar geogrid at the
foundation of the geocell, the conveying
capacity of the establishment likewise
increments. It was distinguished that this
230
expanding can be 30% more than with
geocell alone in the dirt [19]. This was accomplished basically by giving planar support layer and expanding the level of the geocell sleeping cushion.
2.3.2 Chemical Stabilization
Compound adjustment strategies can alter both the physical and synthetic properties of the dirt acting in non-plastic or less plastic [24]. Taking into account this technique, adjustment of soils for the most part relies upon synthetic responses between mineral in the dirt and the stabilizer to achieve the expected degree of ground improvement. Among slow down the adjustment strategies, the procedure most ordinarily taken on is the synthetic alteration, since it successfully control the adjustment of volume by artificially changing the dirt qualities contrasted with different techniques which additionally gives protection from higher strain under prompt relieving of particles.
The expansion of compound admixture brings about the varieties and changes in the substance piece and basic arrangement of materials. It includes the development of cementitious component arrangement by the pozzolanic movement.
Any change that happens in inside response of soil which might be extremely durable in nature, the dirt particles synthetically respond with the admixture.
By treating the dirt with synthetic compounds, a high thickness compaction can be accomplished and the treatment of synthetic substances to the outer layer of soil ought to be kept away from. The dirt blending time, relative proportion are significant variables while the synthetic treated soil blend ought to be taken care of warily with wellbeing measures and furthermore ought not be straightforwardly presented off to the climate. Despite the fact that there are a few faults substance adjustment is generally liked for some land and building destinations because of its decrease in porousness and high strength accomplishment when contrasted with different techniques for adjustment.
2.4 Summary of Literature Review
In light of the writing audits nitty gritty over, the accompanying perceptions were draw down:
The ground improvement strategies by mechanical techniques like earth support, establishment of PVD, vertical channels and so forth can combine and smaller the dirt in shallow as well as more profound profundities.
Taking into account the different ground improvement systems, the most efficient and doable philosophy for shallow profundity change in soil was the dirt adjustment by utilizing admixtures.
Among the dirt adjustment strategies the substance alterationseems to be an improved answer for balancing out the far reaching soils. However the system of crude added substances of concrete and lime adjustment on sweeping soils was sensible strategy, the component of soil change were observable in balanced out condition of soil.
The movement of the substance responses in soil with lime at various phases of relieving period for different rates were broke down.
The life span and the dependability of the synthetic compounds after sturdiness test and free swell file tests are vital to lay out the settling impact and it was concentrated on in soil treated with substance added substances.
The dirt examples when liked for the adjustment of more conservative and dependable method, the examinations were closed by utilizing the added substances of nano particles and it can offers more strength upgrade in with lesser measurements.
The utilization of modern and
agrowastes as compound stabilizers
legitimizes the trademark
improvement of physical and
designing properties of soil and
shows it as a proficient cover by
development of bonds during the
pozzolanic responses.
231
Following with squanders item studies, the utilization of fly debris and GGBS are great stabilizers regarding modern waste administration and reusing.
Adjustment by different cementitous substances modify the dirt properties and compound arrangement upgrading their designing properties, despite the fact that there are different lopsided exercises and incidental effects.
3 CONCLUSION
In this trial examination, both the dirt examples were settled with differing rates 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8% of phosphogypsum and 0, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11% to concentrate on the impact on strength qualities, free swell file and microstructural studies.
According to the examinations made,the following ends were drawn:
Both the dirt examples A and B were delegated Highly compressible Clay (CH) in light of the molecule size and Atterberg's cutoff.
In view of the UCS tests led, the rate increment of 67.29 and 54.21 was seen in soil tests An and B treated with 6% PG at 60days restoring period.
Comparatively with the expansion of 9%
WA in soil test A and B shows the rate increment of 199.3 and 178.26 for a similar time of restoring.
For the treated soil tests, the pace of progress in UCS esteem diminishes with the expansion in relieving days. ie for test A, the increment from 3 days to 7days is 4.47%, 7 to 14 days is 10.75%, 14 to 28 days is 9.31% and 28 to 60 days is 3.57% with the expansion of phosphogypsum. This comparable pattern was seen in example B with phosphogypsumand likewise with wood debris treated soil.
CBR test consequences of 6% PG treated soil at 60days relieving period shows an increment of 9.9% and 9.5%
from 3.6% and 2.7% for test An and B.
Comparably with the 9% wood debris shows the improvement in CBR worth of 10.1% and 9.8% for similar restoring time of 60 days.
Free swell list diminishes with the expansion likewise of stabilizer content and restoring period, and furthermore
shows that, the declines are almost at steady rate for both the dirt examples.
The FSI esteem got decreased from 160%
and 240% to half and 65% for soil test An and B with 6% phosphogypsum at 60 days. Essentially, 9% wood debris decreases FSI values upto 70% and 65%
for both the examples individually. In this way, notwithstanding expansion in strength of soil treated with the stabilizers, additionally limits the issue of enlarging qualities in extensive soils.
Microstructural concentrates on like SEM and XRD results and synthetic examination show an improvement in cementious arrangement on treated soil, which adds to strength advancement in balanced out examples.
pH worth of untreated soil An and B was 7.6 and 7.58 and it changed to 7.07 and 6.98 with 8% PG and 9.81 and 9.75 with 11% WA individually. The pH values show a pattern of impartial nature when the dirt An and B treated with phosphogypsum and towards alkalinity nature when it is treated with wood debris. The worth higher pH in wood debris offered soil is expected more lime dissemination by wood debris.
The UCS worth and solidness file in light of freeze and defrost trial of clayey soils An and B have diminished. Yet, with the expansion of phosphogypsum and wood debris blends in soils, the UCS and solidness list esteem were improved with the ascent in number of patterns of freeze and defrost.
Freeze and Thaw results show that the patterns of restoring stages emphatically affects the strength of treated soil and it is suggested that the ideal measurements of 6% PG and 9% WA content can be suggested for setting up a stabilizer dose that can accomplish practical soundness and sturdiness and can forestall dissolvability issue because of the impact of dampness variety.
In view of the exhibition on
strength, enlarge qualities and solidness
properties of PG and WA with both the
dirts An and B, the admixtures propose
an efficient strategy for soil adjustment
for clayey soils and furthermore tackle the
traditional issues because of their
removals.
232 REFERENCES
1. Arya Assadi Langroudi and S. Shahaboddin Yasrobi (2009), A Micro- Mechanical Approach to Swelling Behavior of Unsaturated Expansive Clays under Controlled Drainage Conditions, Applied Clay Science, Vol. 45, pp: 8–19.
2. Zeynal Abiddin Erguler and Resat Ulusay (2003), A Simple Test and Predictive Models for Assessing Swell Potential of Ankara (Turkey) Clay, Engineering Geology, Vol. 67, pp: 331–
352.
3. Thomas M. Petry and Dallas N. Little (2002), Review of Stabilization of Clays and Expansive Soils in Pavements and Lightly Loaded Structures- History, Practice, and Future, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.14, Issue No. 6, pp: 447-460.
4. Nilo Cesar Consoli, Diego Foppa, Lucas Festugatoand Karla Salvagni Heineck (2007), Key Parameters for Strength Control of Artificially Cemented Soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 133, Issue No.2,pp: 197-205.
5. Suksun Horpibulsuk, Runglawan Rachan, Avirut Chinkulkijniwat, Yuttana Raksachon and Apichat Suddeepong (2010), Analysis of Strength Development in Cement-Stabilized Silty Clay from Microstructural Considerations, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, Issue No.10, pp: 2011- 2021.
6. B. R. Phani Kumar and Radhey S. Sharma (2004), Effect of Fly Ash on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, Issue No. 7, pp: 764- 767.
7. Bumjoo Kim, Monica Prezzi and Rodrigo Salgado (2005), Geotechnical Properties of Fly and Bottom Ash Mixtures for Use in Highway Embankments, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.131, Issue No.7,pp: 914–924.
8. Erdal Cokca (1997), Frost Susceptibility Properties of Soma-B Fly Ash, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 23, Issue No. 1, pp:
1–10.
9. R.C. Joshi, J.P.A. Hettiaratchiand Gopal Achari (1994), Properties of Modified Alberta Fly Ash in Relation to Utilization in Waste Management Applications, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, Issue No.3,pp:
419- 426.
10. Anil Kumar Sharma, P. V. Sivapullaiah Sharma, A. K and Sivapullaiah, P. V. (2016), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Amended Fly Ash as an Expansive Soil Stabilizer, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 56, Issue No.2, pp: 205-212.
11. Sulapha Peethamparan, Jan Olek and Janet Lovell (2008), Influence of Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Cement Kiln Dusts (CKDs) on their Hydration Behavior and Potential Suitability for Soil Stabilization, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 38, Issue No.6, pp: 803–815.
12. Hazardous Waste Management Series (2014), Guidelines for Management, Handling, Utilization and Disposal of Phosphogypsum
Generated from Phosphoric Acid Plants, Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi.
13. Sergejus Gaiducis, Romualdas Maciulaitis and Antanas Kaminskas (2009), Eco‐Balance Features and Significance of Hemihydrate Phosphogypsum Reprocessing into Gypsum Binding Materials, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol.15, Issue No.2, pp: 205- 213.
14. O.O. Amu, I. K.Adewumi, A L Ayodele, R A Mustapha and O. O. Ola (2005), Analysis of California Bearing Ratio Values of Lime and Wood Ash Stabilized Lateritic Soil, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue No. 8, pp:
1479- 1483.
15. J. Ninov, I. Donchev, A. Lenchev and I.
Grancharov (2007), Chemical Stabilization of Sandy-SiltyIllite Clay, Journal of the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Vol.
42, Issue No. 1, pp: 67-72.
16. Olaniyan O.S., Olaoye R.A., Okeyinka O.M.
and Olaniyan D.B (2011), Soil Stabilization Techniques using Sodium Hydroxide Additives, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 11, Issue No.6, pp: 9- 22.
17. Pancar E. B. and Akpinar M. V. (2016), Comparison of Effects of Using Geosynthetics and Lime Stabilization to Increase Bearing Capacity of Unpaved Road Subgrade, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, pp: 1-8.
18. Sujit Kumar Dash, N.R. Krishnaswamy and K.
Rajagopal (2001), Bearing Capacity of Strip Footings Supported on Geocell-Reinforced Sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 19, Issue No.4, pp: 235-256.
19. S. K. Dash, S. Sireesh and T. G. Sitharam (2003), Model Studies on Circular Footing Supported on Geocell Reinforced Sand Underlain by Soft Clay, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 21, no. 4, pp: 197–219.
20. S.N. Moghaddas Tafreshi and A.R. Dawson (2010), Comparison of Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing on Sand with Geocell and with Planar Forms of Geotextile Reinforcement, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 28, Issue No.1, pp: 72-84.
21. Huabao Zhou and Xuejun Wen (2008), Model Studies on Geogrid- or Geocell-Reinforced Sand Cushion on Soft Soil, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 26, Issue No. 3, pp: 231- 238.
22. Hufenus R., Rueegger R., Banjac R., Mayor P., Springman S.M. and Bronnimann R (2006), Full-Scale Field Tests on Geosynthetic Reinforced Unpaved on Soft Subgrade, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 24, Issue No.1, pp: 21-37.
23. Wesseloo J., Visser A.T. and Rust E. (2009), The Stress-Strain Behavior of Multiple Geocell Packs, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol.
27, Issue No.1, pp: 31-38.
24. Sudhakar M Rao and K. S. Subba Rao (1994), Ground heave from caustic soda solution spillage-A case study. Journal of Soils and Foundation, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.
34, Issue No.2, pp: 13-18.
25. Robin E. Graves, James L. Eades and Larry L.
Smith (1988), Strength Developed from
233 Carbonate Cementation of Silica- Carbonate
Base Corse Materials, Transportation Research Record, No. 1190, pp: 24-30.
26. Delage P and Lefebvre G. (1984), Study of the Structure of a Sensitive Champlain Clay and of its Evolution During Consolidation, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 21, Issue No.1, pp:
21-35.
27. Nagaraj T.S, Pandian N. S and Narasimha Raju P. S. R. (1998), Compressibility Behavior of Soft Cemented Soils, Geotechnique, Vol. 48, Issue No. 2, pp: 281-287.
28. J. B. Croft (1967), The Influence of Soil Mineralogical on Cement Stabilization, Geotechnique, Vol. 17, Issue No. 2, pp: 119- 135.
29. Ramana, K. V. (1993), Expansive Soils:
Problems and Practice in Foundation and Pavement Engineering, Engineering Geology, Vol. 35, Issue No.1, pp: 136–138.
30. S. H. Chew, A. H. M. Kamruzzaman and F.H.
Lee (2004), Physicochemical and Engineering Behavior of Cement Treated Clays, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 130, Issue No.7, pp.
696- 706.
31. Suksun Horpibulsuk, Runglawan Rachan, Avirut Chinkulkijniwat, Yuttana Raksachon and Apichat Suddeepong (2010), Analysis of Strength Development in Cement-Stabilized Silty Clay from Microstructural Considerations, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, Issue No.10, pp: 2011- 2021.
32. Norihiko Miura, Suksun Horpibulsuk and Nagaraj T. S (2001), Engineering Behavior of Cement Stabilized Clay at High Water Content, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 41, Issue No.5, pp:
33-45.
33. Horpibulsuk S., Bergado D. T and Lorenzo G.
A. (2004), Compressibility of Cement-Admixed Clays at High Water Content, Geotechnique, Vol. 54, Issue No.2, pp: 151-154.
34. Kolias, S., Kasselouri Rigopoulou, V. and Karahalios A. (2005), Stabilization of Clayey Soils with High Calcium Fly Ash and Cement, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, Issue No. 2, pp: 301-313.
35. Way S. J. and Shayan A. (1989), Early Hydration of a Portland Cement in Water and Sodium Hydroxide Solutions: Composition of Solutions and Nature of Solid Phases, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 19, Issue No.5, pp: 759-769.
36. Susan D. Rafalko, George M.Filz, Thomas L.
Brandon and James K. Mitchell (2008), Rapid Chemical Stabilization of Soft Clay Soils, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2026, Issue No., pp: 39-46.
37. Zhongjie Zhang and Mingjiang Tao (2008), Durability of Cement Stabilized Low Plasticity Soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.134, Issue No. 2, pp: 203-213.
38. Chun-Yang yin Hilmi, Yin Hilmi Bin Mahmud and MdGhazalay Shaaban (2006), Stabilization/Solidification of Lead- Contaminated Soil using Cement and Rice Husk Ash, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.137, Issue No.3, pp: 1-7.
39. Farid Sariosseiri and Balasingam Muhunthan (2008), Effect of Cement Treatment on Geotechnical Properties of Some Washington State Soils, Engineering Geology, Vol. 104, Issue No. 1-2, pp. 119–125.
40. M.A. Rahman (1987), Effect of Cement-Rice Husk Ash mixtures on Geotechnical properties of Laterite soil, Soil and Foundations – Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp:61-65.
41. J.B. Croft (1967), The Influence of Soil Mineralogical Composition on Lime Stabilization, Department of Geology, University of Queensland, Vol. 17, Issue No.2, pp: 119-135.
42. Shenbaga R. Kanirajand Vasant G. Havanagi (1999), Compressive Strength of Cement stabilized Flyash-Soil mixtures, Journal of Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 29, Issue No.5, pp: 673–677.
43. Dash, S. K and Hussain, M (2012), Lime Stabilization of Soils: Reappraisal, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, Issue No.6, pp: 707-714.
44. F.G. Bell (1996), Lime Stabilization of Clay Minerals and Soils, Engineering Geology, Vol.
42, Issue No. 4, pp: 223-237.
45. George Harrison Hilt(1960), Lime Fixation in Clayey Soils, Donald Thomas Davidson.
46. Sidney Diamond and Earl B. Kinter (1964), Mechanisms of Soil-Lime Stabilization, Material division, U.S Bureau of Public Roads, pp: 83-104.
47. Kumar Sandeep and Mahla R.P (2015), CBR Improvement of Soil by Adding Lime and Fly Ash,International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, Vol.3, Issue No.6, pp: 542-646.
48. Paul K. Mathew and S. Narasimha Rao (1997), Effect of Lime on Cation Exchange Capacity of Marine Clay, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123, Issue No.2, pp: 183-185.
49. Jacques Locat, Helene Trembaly and Serge Leroueil (1996), Mechanical and Hydraulic Behavior of a Soft Inorganic Clay Treated with Lime, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 33, Issue No.4, pp: 654-669.
50. Nilo Cesar Consoli, Luizmar da Silva Lopes, Pedro Domingos Marques Prietto, Lucas Festugato and Rodrigo Caberlon Cruz (2011), Variables Controlling Stiffness and Strength of Lime-Stabilized Soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 137, Issue No. 6, pp: 628-632.
51. Jacques Locat, Marc-Andre Berube and Marc Choquette (1990), Laboratory Investigations on the Lime Stabilization of Sensitive Clays: Shear Strength Development, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27, Issue No. 3, pp: 294- 304.
52. Clare K. E. and Cruchley A. E. (1957), Laboratory Experiments in the Stabilization of Clays with Hydrated Lime, Geotechnique, Vol.
7, Issue No. 2, pp: 97-111.
53. Khattab S. A., Al-Mukhtar M. and Fleureau J.M. (2007), Long-Term Stability Characteristics of a Lime-Treated Plastic Soil, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.
19, Issue No.4, pp: 358 - 366.
234 54. Masashi Kamon and Supakij Nontananandh
(1991), Combining Industrial Wastes with Lime for Soil Stabilization, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 117, Issue No.1, pp: 1-17.
55. S. M. Rao, B.V.V. Reddy and M. Muttharam (2001), The Impact of Cyclic Wetting and Drying on the Swelling Behavior of Stabilized Expansive Soils, Engineering Geology, Vol. 60, Issue No.1- 4, pp: 223-233.
56. J. Hernandez, S. Vargas, M. Estevez, G.
Vazquez, A. Zepeda and R. Rodriguez (2005), Hydrophobic Modification of an Expansive Soil using Polymers and Organic Compounds: A Comparative Study with Lime, Geotechnique, Vol. 55, Issue No. 8, pp: 613-616.
57. Alperovitch N., Shainberg I. and Keren R.
(1981), Specific Effect of Magnesium on the Hydraulic Conductivity of Sodic Soils, Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 32, Issue No. 4, pp: 543- 554.
58. Keren R (1991), Specific Effect of Magnesium on Soil Erosion and Water Infiltration, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 55, Issue No. 3, pp: 783-787.
59. Xeidakis G. S. (1996), Stabilization of Swelling Clays by Mg(OH)2Factors Affecting Hydroxy- Mg-Interlayering in Swelling Clays, Engineering Geology, Vol. 44, Issue No. 1-4, pp: 93-106.
60. Kent Newman and Jeb S. Tingle (2004), Emulsion Polymers for Soil Stabilization, FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA, pp:
2-18.
61. A.U. Ravi Shankar, Harsha Kumar Rai and Ramesha Mithanthaya I. (2009), Bio-Enzyme Stabilized Lateritic Soil as a Highway Material, Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, Vol.70, Issue No. 2, pp: 143-151.
62. Olaniyan O. S., Olaoye R. A., Okeyinka O. M.
and Olaniyan D. B. (2011), Soil Stabilization Techniques using Sodium Hydroxide Additives, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol.11, Issue No.
6, pp: 9-22.
63. Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti, Ali Vafaei, and Saman Soleimani Kutanaei (2014), Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil Improved with Cement and Nano silica, De Gruyter, Vol.
5, Issue No. 1, pp. 111-116.
64. Ali Akbar Firoozi, Taha M. R., Ali Asghar Firooziand Khan T. A. (2014), Assessment of Nano-Zeolite on Soil Properties, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,Vol.8, Issue No.19, pp: 292-295.
65. W. R. Azzam, Reduction of the Shrinkage–
Swelling Potential with Polymer Nanocomposite Stabilization, Applied Polymer Science, Vol.123, Issue No.1, pp: 299-306.
66. P. Hareesh and R. Vinoth Kumar (2016), Assessment of Nano Materials on Geotechnical Properties of Clayey soils, International Conference on Engineering Innovations and Solutions,pp: 66-70.
67. Laxmikant Yadu and R. K. Tripathi (2013), Effects of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in the Engineering Behaviour of Stabilized Soft Soil, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 51, pp: 125-131.
68. Kumar Sharma A. and Sivapullaiah P. V.
(2012), Improvement of Strength of Expansive
Soil with Waste Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Geocongress, pp: 3920-3928.
69. Kolawole Juwunlo Osinub (2006), Influence of Compactive Efforts on Lime- Slag Treated Tropical Black Clay, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, Issue No. 2, pp:
175-181.
70. Yaolin Yi, Martin Liska and Abir Al-Tabbaa (2012), Initial Investigation into the Use of GGBS-MgO in Soil Stabilisation, Geotechnical Special Publication, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Grouting and Deep Mixing, New Orleans.
71. G. N. Obuzor, J. M. Kinuthia and R. B.
Robinson (2011), Utilisation of Lime Activated GGBS to Reduce the Deleterious Effect of Flooding on Stabilised Road Structural Materials: A Laboratory Simulation, Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol. 122, Issue No. 3 - 4, pp: 334 -338.
72. Isik Yilmaz and Berrin Civelekoglu (2009), Gypsum: An Additive for Stabilization of Swelling Clay Soils, Applied Clay Science, Vol.
44, Issue No.1-2, pp: 166-172.
73. Anurag Rathee, Paramjeet Malik and Vikramaditya Sangwan (2016), Strength Characteristics of Bentonite-Lime-Gypsum Mix Reinforced with Coir Fibers, International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods, Vol. 4, Issue No. 6, pp:
235-240.
74. Kaniraj S. R. and Havanagi V. G. (1999), Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilized Fly Ash-Soil Mixtures, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 29, Issue No. 5, pp: 673-677.
75. Prabakar J., Dendorkar N. and Morchhale R.
K. (2004), Influence of Fly Ash on Strength Behavior of Typical Soils, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 8, Issue No.4, pp: 263- 267.
76. Erdal Cokca (2001), Use of Class C Fly Ashes for the Stabilization of an Expansive Soil, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, Issue No. 7, pp: 568- 573.
77. Dimitris Dermatas and Xiaoguang Meng (2003), Utilization of Fly Ash for Stabilization/
Solidification of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils, Engineering Geology, Vol. 70,Issue No.
3-4, pp: 377–394.
78. Tuncer B. Edil, Hector A. Acosta, and Craig H.
Benson (2006), Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, Issue No.2, pp: 283-294.
79. Z. A. Baghdadi, M. N. Fatani and N. A. Sabban (1995), Soil Modification by Cement Kiln Dust, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.
7, Issue No.4, pp: 218-222.
80. Gerald A. Miller and Shahriar Azad (2000), Influence of Soil Type on Stabilization with Cement Kiln Dust, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 14, Issue No.2, pp: 89-97.
81. Joseph Ejelikwu Edeh, Isaac Olufemi Agbedeand Audu Tyoyila (2014), Evaluation of Sawdust Ash–Stabilized Lateritic Soil as Highway Pavement Material, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, Issue No. 2, pp: 367- 373.
82. S. M. Rao, B. V. Venkatarama Reddy and M.
Muttharam (2000), Engineering Behavior of
235 Wood-Ash-Modified Soils, Ground
Improvement, Vol. 4, pp: 137-140.
83. Kiran R.G and Kiran. L (2013), Analysis of Strength Characteristics of Black Cotton Soil using Bagasse Ash and Additives as Stabilizer, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol.2, Issue No.7, pp: 2240-2246.
84. Anupam A. K, Kumar P and Ransinchung R.
N. G. D (2013), Use of Various Agricultural and Industrial Waste Materials in Road Construction, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences of 2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India, Vol. 104, pp: 264- 273.
85. Vishal Ghutke, Pranita Bhandari and Vikash Agrawal (2018), Stabilization of Soil by using Rice Husk Ash, The International Journal of Engineering and Science, pp: 92-95.
86. Rathan Raj R., Banupriya S. and Dharani R.
(2016), Stabilization of Soil using Rice Husk Ash, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, Vol. 6, Issue No. 2, pp:
43-50.
87. Jose James andM. Subba Rao (1986), Reactivity of Rice Husk Ash,Cement and Concrete Research,Vol.16, Issue No. 3, pp:
296-302.
88. IS: 2720 (Part 1) 1983, Methods of Test for Soil - Preparation of Dry Soil Sample for Various Tests, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
89. IS: 2720 (Part 3; Sec. – 1), 1980, Methods of Tests for Soil - Determination of Specific Gravity, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
90. IS: 2720 (Part 4)1985, Methods of Test for Soils - Grain size analysis, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
91. IS: 2720 (Part 5-1985), Methods of Tests for Soil - Determination of Liquid and Plastic Limit, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
92. IS: 2720 (Part 40) 2002, Methods of Tests for Soil - Determination of Free Swell Index of Soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
93. IS: 1498 (1970), Classification and Identification of Soils for General Engineering Purposes, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
94. Holtz, W.G and Gibbs, H.J (1956), Engineering Properties of Expansive Caly, Transaction of ASCE, Vol.121, pp : 641-643.
95. Chenn, F H (1988), Foundation on Expansive Soils, Elsevier Publication, Amesterdam.
96. Altmeyer W. T. (1956), Discussion on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils, Transactions of ASCE, Vol.121, pp: 666 - 669.
97. IS: 2720 (Part 7) 1980, Methods of Tests for Soil - Determination of Water Content-Dry Density Relation using Light Compaction, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
98. IS: 2720 (Part 10) 1973, Methods of Tests for Soil – Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
99. IS: 2720 (Part 16) 1987, Methods of Tests for Soil – Laboratory Determination of CBR, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
100. L. Reijnder(2007), Cleaner Phosphogypsum, Coal Combustion Ashes and Waste Incineration Ashes for Application in Building Materials: A review, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, Issue No. 2, pp: 1036–
1042.
