View of TRANSFORM YOUR ORGANIZATION TO ENHANCE YOUR PERFORMANCE RESULTS

(1)

Vol.04,Special Issue 06, (IC-IREASM-2019) October 2019, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

1

TRANSFORM YOUR ORGANIZATION TO ENHANCE YOUR PERFORMANCE RESULTS P. K. Joy¹, Dr. Prakash Divakaran²

1Research Scholar, Himalayan University,

Faculty of Business Administration, Itanagar, AP (India)

2Research Supervisor, Department of Management Himalayan University, Itanagar, AP (India)

Abstract - Provided for those fast developments and the expanded dependence on technology, those address of how it will be evolving fill in employment is Exceptionally notable to researchers from claiming authoritative brain science also authoritative conduct technique (OP/OB). This article endeavors with way they decipher those progress, direction, motivation behind current research on the impacts of engineering on fill in Furthermore associations. Then afterward an Audit for enter breakthroughs in the advancement for technology, we think about those disruptive impacts for rising data furthermore correspondence advances. We At that point analyze numbers Furthermore sorts of occupations influenced eventually developments clinched alongside technology, entryway this will prompt noteworthy laborer disengagement. With show technology's effect on work, worth of effort systems, organizations, we available four well known technologies: electronic following systems, robots, teleconferencing, wearable registering units. On gatherings give insights in regards to the thing that we think something like the impacts from claiming innovation for OP/OB scholars, we Think as of the comes about from claiming examination directed starting with four diverse perspectives on the part of innovation organization Previously, administration. We likewise analyze how that part is evolving in the developing globe from claiming engineering organization. We reason eventually recognizing methodologies should six mankind's assets (HR) territories underpinned via universal also developing technologies, recognizing related Scrutinize inquiries that if need profound suggestions both to research furthermore for practice, giving direction to future investigate.

Keywords: Transform, Organization.

1 INTRODUCTION

Benefits of the business sagacity (BI) frameworks need aid planned will give backing Also move forward choice making forms within associations. A standout amongst the contentions utilized toward bi vendors for adopting bi systems, both vital operational, may be that they move forward an organization’s proficiency with convert and contend clinched alongside rapidly-changing business spots.

This paper evaluates that claim by comparing the capabilities firms require to adapt to market-driven change as outlined in two key theories of organizational transformation (i.e. dynamic capability theory and the absorptive capacity construct) to the claims made by vendors about BI-led organizational transformation in their literature.

An examination of BI vendor literature is important for two reasons. First, it permits an understanding of the BI industry’s conception of the types of transformation possible through the use of BI systems. Second, leaders in organizations such as CIOs rely heavily on vendor marketing material to develop their own understandings of the capabilities of BI systems and how to integrate them into their organizations. A recent study based on interviews with CIOs found that the CIO had a well-developed and mature understanding of BI systems. The study found the most useful source of information they used to develop that understanding was information obtained from BI vendors.

In a competitive and large market all the major BI vendors have sophisticated and well-funded marketing and sales operations. For example, prior to their acquisition by SAP, the BI vendor Business Objects reported it spent approximately 70% (i.e. over $US600 million annually) of its revenue on sales and marketing activities. It is reasonable to assume that other vendors spend similar amounts. The publications produced by these organizations represent an important and influential body of literature that is often ignored by researchers.

1.1 Research Approach

That exploration methodology comprises from claiming two steps. In it looks will create a understanding of the merchant viewpoint about BI-enabled authoritative change. This may

(2)

2

be secured utilizing topical substance dissection from claiming vendor-authored writing.

This viewpoint will be afterward contrasted with the outcomes of a standard academic written works Audit of two model hypotheses tending to that topic: absorptive limit progressive ability hypothesis. While the literature review in step two requires little explanation in terms of technique, details of the thematic content analysis are provided below. This approach is similar to other projects examining information systems topics.

The thematic content analysis began with the collection of a sample of professional literature including white papers, blogs, surveys, and opinion and news articles. This initial collection of literature contained articles from a wide range of sources including vendors, consulting firms, IT service firms, news sites and online discussion portals. It quickly became apparent that the sample was too generic and chaotic for any meaningful analysis.

The scope of the sample was subsequently restricted to BI vendor-authored literature.

A stratified sampling approach was adopted to ensure the sample was representative of BI vendor literature. Documents were chosen based on the nature of the vendor, and on the nature of the document itself. Vendors were included if they had annual BI-related product license revenue greater than US$15 million, significant recent revenue growth, and were included in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence Platforms. Documents were included in the sample if they were whitepapers, blog posts, marketing brochures and discussion threads that were clearly published by and expressed the opinion of the chosen BI vendor.

The sample was further screened though the use of keyword specific searches. This was performed to ensure that the documents addressed in some way the topic of business transformation. A set of keywords likely to be associated with BI-led business transformation was developed and were used to further cull the sample. Table 1 shows the keywords used and the number of occurrences in the sample.

Table 1 List of keywords used for screening documents

2. UNDERSTANDING ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION: THE BI VENDOR PERSPECTIVE

Those wide-ranging sway that bi frameworks could have on choice making clinched alongside associations developed Likewise an essential topic in the merchant writing. This topic will be exemplified this quote Previously, a majority of the data developers promoting brochure: “By empowering clients to effortlessly find Realities through basic Pivotal word searches, associations cam wood figure it out critical benefit additions upgrade choice making crosswise over the endeavor. ” those effect once choice making might a chance to be sorted under two sub-themes talked about below, namely: enhancing those choice making procedure Also enhancing right to majority of the data.

2.1. Improving the Decision-Making Process

The improvements to the decision-making process afforded by the use of BI were classified into three main interrelated categories, namely speed and quality, improved collaboration, and broadening the scope of decisions an organization can make through the more pervasive use of BI.

Reducing the cycle time and improving the quality of decision-making was typically referred to using words such as “better” and “faster.” For example, SAP argues, “companies want greater agility so they can make decisions based on today’s information, now.” An IBM

(3)

3

marketing brochure focuses on improvements to cycle time and quality when it states that,

“Making better, faster decisions provides decision makers throughout the organization with the interactive, self-service environment needed for exploration and analysis.” There are many other examples where reduction in cycle time is emphasized in the vendor literature.

2.2. Improving Decision-Maker Insight

The second sub-theme relates to how the use of a BI system can improve a decision maker’s access to, and the quality of, information. Many BI vendors expressed the view that current changes in the way organizations conduct their business was driving the need for improved access to information. An SAP marketing brochure supports this: “...technology makes it easier to access relevant information, allowing people to know their business, transform their decision-making and ultimately achieve remarkable results.” , a SAS article links the themes of pervasiveness and improved access by claiming that when, “...information is made pervasive throughout the organization, the entire company can take advantage of it to gain strategic insights, make informed decisions and drive better business results.”

The vendors also frequently claim that access to information can be improved when information ‘silos’ are removed and that BI systems can be used to achieve these ends.

Information silos can limit access to information between parts of an organization and tend to be the result of problems with the organization’s culture and structure. It is interesting to note that BI vendors tend to view information silos to be a potential impediment to be overcome for a BI system to be effective. When vendor literature mentions improved access to information through the reduction of organization and information silos the topic of data governance (e.g. master data management) is often mentioned. It is interesting to note however that BI vendors mention data governance as something that their customers must address rather than it being something that a BI system can address.

A typical example is this SAS whitepaper which states: “...data governance is usually the most frequently mentioned and biggest challenge in the context of business analytics projects.”

In addition to explaining how BI systems can improve access to information within an organization, BI vendors provide examples of the actual benefits that can come from the use of BI systems. These benefits are usually communicated in one of two ways, namely:

general comments about how improved access to information can provide decision-makers with greater insight about their organization; and case-study examples outlining the benefits obtained by their customers.

3. UNDERSTANDING ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION: THE MANAGEMENT THEORY PERSPECTIVE

The reason for this segment is will draw on the physique for written works from oversaw economy principle on permit An examination for those perspective from claiming authoritative change determined starting with the bi merchant writing in the past segment.

Broadly, there would two classifications of principle that try to clarify firm conduct technique previously, focused businesses: the individuals that analyze the market structure and the firm’s relationship with it (e. G. The aggressive powers vital rivalry approaches); the individuals that inspect qualities of the firm itself – notably those resource-based see (RBV) and hypotheses tending to firm abilities. As the BI vendor literature largely ignores market- level issues, instead dealing with intra-firm systems and capabilities, we have chosen two theories from the latter category to compare with. These two theories are the theory of dynamic capabilities and absorptive capacity. The theories are presented as exemplars, rather than as complete coverage of potentially relevant management theories.

3.1. Dynamic Capability Theory 3.1.1. Theoretical Background

Dynamic capability theory is an approach to understanding strategic management within RBV. Under RBV, a firm’s sustained competitive advantage can be understood by how a firm’s resources and capabilities are acquired, arranged and disposed of in comparison to other firms within a given market. Dynamic capability theory extends RBV to consider turbulent markets and how firms are able to develop capabilities and routines to adapt and change to sustain competitive advantages in turbulent marketplaces.

(4)

4

An operational capability is a set of routines that offer managers a range of options, or paths, for planning a course of organizational action, leading to the production of outputs of a particular type. A dynamic capability, on the other hand specifically provides the “ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure” capabilities in markets exhibiting a high rate of change. The dynamic capabilities approach regards these capabilities in the same way that the RBV regards strategic resources. When a firm has a “distinctive” dynamic capability it cannot be easily reproduced by its competitors, giving the firm a sustained competitive advantage.

3.1.2. Some Implications of Dynamic Capability Theory for BI

Strategic (as opposed to operational) BI is a potential enabler of a key dynamic capability:

BI processes can be considered a higher-order dynamic capability. While IT capabilities in general offer a wider range of paths available in a dynamic environment, strategic BI systems go beyond this to have as their primary aim support for decision-making processes leading to path selection. However, the theory offers some important considerations regarding the nature of BI if they are to be realized as a dynamic capability.

Eisenhardt and Martin argue that dynamic capabilities change their nature in relation to the level of turbulence in a dynamic market. They differentiate between moderate-velocity dynamic markets and high-velocity dynamic markets. In moderate velocity markets, dynamic capabilities become “detailed, analytic, stable processes with predictable outcomes”, with linear, well defined steps. Decision making in markets without a high degree of turbulence becomes more effective if it resembles a linear pass through Simon’s phase model of decision-making. The decisions may involve complex analyses and considered deliberation, but follow a predictable, structured path. On the other hand, strategic decision-making in high velocity dynamic markets is by necessity simpler and more evolutionary. Simple routines provide semi-structured support for decision-makers while allowing the flexibility and freedom to respond in an ambiguous and unpredictable environment.

3.2. Absorptive Capacity 3.2.1. Theoretical Background

Absorptive capacity (AC) describes one of an organization’s key learning processes, namely, the ability to identify, acquire, assimilate or transform, and exploit knowledge. An organization’s AC is considered to be a key component of successful innovation and ultimately the long-term success of the organization. AC draws on two perspectives: the economics of research and development, and the effect of organization-wide learning and skill development on innovation.

AC is based on the assumption that an organization, being a collection of individuals, will acquire knowledge and develop skills in a manner similar, but not identical, to the manner in which individuals acquire knowledge and develop skills. For example, an organization will be more likely to identify and make productive use of information about a new technological development in a given field if the organization already possesses some knowledge or expertise in the same or a related field.

3.2.2. Some Implications of Absorptive Capacity for BI

It is possible for BI systems to provide any of the three IT capabilities. For example, a BI system can provide an outside-in IT capability if a data mart or enterprise data warehouse has one or more data feeds from external sources (e.g. social media site data, credit score data, climate and weather data, competitor pricing). Inside out capability might be provided by a BI system based on a data mart that supports reporting for a single department.

Spanning capabilities could be provided by organization-wide BI systems supported by an enterprise data warehouse that integrates information from many disparate systems and presents it to users in an accessible, standardized and coherent format.

The framework includes two additional moderating capabilities: coordination and socialization. Coordination capabilities refer to an organization’s ability to manage intra- and inter-organizational dependencies. Socialization capabilities refer to an organization’s ability to create a common culture and shared understanding of the environment in which the organization operates.

(5)

5

BI systems can enhance coordination capabilities in two ways. First, the integrated and standardized data provided by a BI system facilitates information sharing between the relevant internal and external stakeholders. Second, the increased access to information provided by a BI system makes it easier for the correct people to participate in the decision- making process.

BI systems can directly and indirectly influence socialization capabilities. The direct influence on socialization capabilities is provided by the standardized information language that a BI system, particularly one that is organization-wide, imposes on the users. The indirect influence on socialization capabilities can be provided by the behavioural changes when the BI system is used as the source for performance management and decision- making information. However, the influence afforded by the behavioural changes will depend more on cultural and implementation factors rather than technical factors.

3.3. Summary

There is a large body of literature addressing the topic of organizational transformation, offering a rich theory base from which to understand how BI and other decision support tools can contribute to the transformation process. We have addressed two theories from the field of strategic management, but there are a large number of other potential research areas of relevance including change management, organizational learning, and leadership.

This section has highlighted the potential for these theories to inform decisions regarding the adoption of BI systems, their deployment in organizations undergoing transformation and their configuration. A realistic understanding of the role of BI in organizational transformation recognizes both the opportunities offered by such technology, as well as its drawbacks and limitations.

The next section compares and contrasts the vendors’ perspective on BI-enabled organizational transformation discussed in Section 2 with the perspectives presented here in Section 3, drawing conclusions for BI vendors, customers and researchers.

4. CONCLUDING DISCUSSION

The first two segments introduce two Verwoerd separate perspectives on the elements included previously, authoritative conversion. Those substance dissections of the merchant writing reveals to a concentrate on two areas: Those choices undertaking itself; and the majority of the data that contributes of the transform. The two primary profits set ahead Toward vendors coming about because of the utilization about bi done associations with respect to those choice making procedure would moved forward choice conclusions (“better decisions”) Also expanded pace (“faster decisions”). Little will be said over the reason or how choices will make better, or in fact, the reason and quicker choice is fundamentally a better choice. Those understood declaration will be that speedier choices relying with respect to additional data would naturally exceptional choices. Same time this might a chance to be those event to a portion choice tasks, it may be not reasonable that this may be so much valid to at decisions, particularly key choices.

The idea that giving decision-makers more insight into business problems is beneficial is, at face value, reasonable. However, the technical focus of BI vendors on sourcing data from across heterogeneous data sources and organizational units, and enforcing data homogeneity across the enterprise is a very narrow focus. A strategic decision-maker may or may not be hindered by a lack of insight into internal business functioning, and even if so, the problem may not necessarily be one of inconsistent data formats or other problems in the data. A key organizational capacity for transforming organizations is the ability to assimilate external as well as internal information. Again, while the implicit assumption of BI vendors regarding internal information access may hold for some decision tasks, it is not necessarily true for all. The data-oriented view of problems facing decision-makers held by BI vendors does not necessarily address the knowledge- oriented problems decision-makers may actually face. Organizational transformation is a challenging issue for firms in competitive environments, with a rich mix of complex factors at play.

The two theories presented in Section 3 provide different but complementary lenses that highlight a range of factors that influence the success of competitive organizations. In the case of dynamic capability theory, BI can be considered a second or third-order dynamic capability. BI provides an expanded set of ‘paths’ for decision-makers to follow. It

(6)

6

suggests that the kind of BI system (operational versus more traditional strategic BI) depends significantly on the ‘velocity’ of the market in which the firm operates. While the vendor literature partly addresses the concept of ‘paths’ with its focus on information access, it does so in a data-centric way. In terms of market type, the vendor literature is silent, advocating the use of operational BI without consideration of the market. In the case of AC, there is a clear role for BI to play in incorporating, integrating and applying external knowledge to allow transformation to occur. BI can be an enabler of an organization’s outside-in, spanning and inside-out IT capabilities.

However, the vendor treatment of information management issues largely ignores external data sources – a key component of AC. Arguably, when an organization is undergoing significant transformation, external information is more important and relevant than historical internal information. It is therefore perhaps more important for BI vendors advocating their technology as enablers of organizational transformation to address the problem of external sourcing and assimilation of information than internal data management issues such as master data management, information silos and access.

REFERENCES

1. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997. 18(7): p. 509-533.

2. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 1989. 99(397): p. 569-596.

3. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990. 25(1): p. 128-152.

4. O'Donnell, P. and Phule, R., How do CIO’s learn about Business Intelligence? Unpublished - Forthcoming.

5. Arnott, D. and Pervan, G., A critical analysis of decision support systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 2005. 20(2): p. 67-87.

6. Bauer, M.W., Classical Content Analysis: A Review, in Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research, Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G.D., Editors. 2000, Sage Publications Ltd.

7. Braun, V. and Clarke, V., Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006. 3(2): p. 77-101.

8. Hancox, M. and Hackney, R., IT Outsourcing: Frameworks for Conceptualizing Practice and Perception.

Information Systems Journal, 2000. 10(3): p. 217-237.

9. Sammon, D., Adam, F., Nagle, T., and Carlsson, S., Making Sense of the Master Data Management (MDM) Concept: Old Wine in New Bottles or New Wine in Old Bottles?, in Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Bridging the Socio-technical Gap in Decision Support Systems: Challenges for the Next Decade, Respicio, A., Adam, F., Phillips-Wren, G., Teixeira, C., and Telhada, J., Editors. 2010, IOS Press: Amsterdam. p.

175-186.

10. Marshall, M.N., Sampling for Qualitative Research. Family Practice, 1996. 13(6): p. 522 -526.

11. Winter, S.G., Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003. 24(10): p. 991- 995.

12. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A., Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 2000. 21(10/11): p. 1105-1121.

13. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V., Shaping Agility through Digital Options:

Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly, 2003.

27(2): p. 237-263.

14. Simon, H.A., The New Science of Management Decision. 3rd Revised ed. 1977, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

15. Gorry, G.A. and Scott Morton, M.S., A Framework for Management Information Systems. Sloan Management Review, 1971. 13(1): p. 21-36.

16. Keen, P.G.W., Adaptive Design for Decision Support Systems. Data Base, 1980. 12: p. 15-25.

17. Pendse, N. BI Survey 8. Last Updated: 2009; Available from: http://www.bi-survey.com.

18. Lane, P.J., Koka, B.R., and Pathak, S., the Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. The Academy of Management Review Archive, 2006. 31(4): p. 833-863.

19. Zahra, S.A. and George, G., Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 2002. 27(2): p. 185-203.

20. Roberts, N., Galluch, P.S., Dinger, M., and Grover, V., Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly, In Press. In Press.

21. Moss, L.T. and Atre, S., Business Intelligence Roadmap: The complete project lifecycle for decisionsupport applications. 2003: Addison-Wesley.

22. Eckerson, W., Gauge Your Data Warehouse Maturity, in Information Management Magazine. 2004.

23. Rajterič, I., Overview of Business Intelligence Maturity Models. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 2010. 15(1): p. 22.