66 ! 2
# $ 1392
( )*
203 - 212
! ) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
$ %& ' ( ) *
+ ! (,
- . 0 1 0 21
2
4 56 2*
7 8 23
56 : ! ;<
5 5 % 24
5
1 . @ 8 ) 8 AB$ ! ,C - D
' - FG H8 I J BC -
$ H C - . KL M -
N !
2 8 3 . FG H8 I C - J BC -
$ H C - . KL M -
N !
4 . H I H8 I B )
J BC -
$ H C - ' 8 C! 8 1 8 -
N !
5 .
O !
D P Q B$ H C ' '
H BC - FG H8 I2
$ H C - . KL M -
N !
) :
24 / 11 / –1390 :
24 / 11 / 1391 (
H BR
- .
# /0 1 $ 2 / 3 4 5 6 7 89:
58;
<#
3 4 : 5
=;
: 8> =
?Ĥ A:
/0 3 B:
3 ; 8 C8D5
87 87 / )#5 8!
. :
=;
/ 4 A:
/0 3 4 D
.FG
=#H ! I 0 8I!
.3 JI-
- 8
?K$
8LM 2 8 = 87 58;
<#
3 4 : = N ; 3 ; 8 4
;8$8 O N
=G8$
4
= 8H P8D / ; 5 . I
Q (RQ 5 5 2
= 0FS 4 T5
= 8 3 4 O898 N U V#
0 5:
T : 3
= : / S 5 . 4 2 8I>
5 4 B #G DH
4 : . FG 5 5:
T P03 DNA
$ I W I6 I
/ I7 I!
TI5 I5
0 #5 5 4 8!
. 2 2 V $ X . 5
;
= 9Y
! 2 8 ( 9 D
; I 8 98IQ98 - 4 I I =I;
/ 0 4 7 T 5:
3 ZQ 4 /0!
= ( 8*
Q!
=#!
U8 5 4 3
5 - 4 5
?
= V 4
=5 U8 0IFS 4 ) FBS L-
15 (PBS S] ^Q
= 8 DNA U8 5 3 4 8H 3 UY_
A:
4 2 S ; ) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
3 4 87 87 Z-
8H 4 7 ) 6 12 24 48 1 5 ( / )#5 0!
. 0*
V 4 U8 5 3 Y W* 8b I> 8
I c dI : I Y 4 I^ $ 8I
= 5 0!
.
# e . 5
; 4
= 8 3 4 8H 4 0FS /0!
U8 3 4 L-15 ( )$FBS
4 I
Y I5:
T
2 DNA 3
4 8
>
0 9 M
=;
= 8 3 4 4 0FS /0!
24 PBS 1 5 Z- f ! 4 0FS Yb .
gD5 5:
T
= DNA )*
)
= 9Y 03 ! ( 0
) 05 / 0
<
.(P 2 X
# e
=
>
05
<F $ 2 W 1 j)M
4 V U8 7 3 4 Y _ 0FS
4 U8 3 4 87 87 A8 5
# 0FS
4 0!
. f8
# e 2 X V $ 03
=;
= 8 3 4 8H 3 B:
! 2 8$
$ 48 1 5 0 5:
T U8 DNA
3 4 L-15 $FBS
! I
4
# 5 G 7 $ Q 4 0FS
; .
IP 8 5!
5:
T
; 8 DNA 5
# O Q U8 5 8H . 5
; 0FS
4 .
Email: hfarahmand@ut.ac.ir 09127669461 :2) $ U8m /0 8 *
204 !
66
#$
2
% &
1392
1 . S
# . - <F ( 1868 Q 1
ID M n8I 1
# B8
8!
/0 1 2 $ / I3 4
7 8II9: II6 II5 II5
=II;
/ II
=II 8II
# 7 / 4 n U M FG 5 5 5
. . I-
#
<# 58; N :
NI ; =I ; I 8
I3
C8D5 87 87 #b I 98 5 !8 98Q98
8H ( 8* # G Y : 5 ! 7
= =;
I?:
I 8 ? /0I A:
I3 I I- I6
N O898 B:
4 RI5 I IFG B:
I
: <# 58; o # F 5
I 0I ; I
= I5 :
( p$
<# 58;
4 3 : =I / q rI $ 1 I5
8!
?K$
B Ir ( /0I A:
I3 =IQ WI _
U III# ; sIII-
8III!
0 4 78III G III
8III!
.(Hussein et al., 2008)
4 I3 ; 8 2 I 2I
98IIQ98 II Y
II3 0II
: 2II =IIQ =II G
C8D5 9
t5 - Q O898 3
$ /03 0 s-
* u#H tI5 -
I3 WI 81 . I$
I5 #I .
= : / R1 3
4 I5 0G (RQI / 0I
4 I 7
0 8G < Y : 9 b .
: 4 I / I =I;
/0 A:
3 4 D
.FG =#H ! I
0 8I!
8II - ( IIV V $
?KII$
WII 81 2II 8IILM
<# 58;
3 P8ID 8IH =I 4 I =G8$ : 4
5 / ; : I! IQ # O T 5: . 5
I3
8$
; 8 N 8 5
TI5 IQ # O
b 7 >
S P .
=
=Q W 9 3
: 4
0uV F
# NI $8 8 O 8I 0I 2
=I 87 I3 4
B:
4 IIur
o
II 3 IIFG 8
II SII 3
/0 A:
3 0
= 8 0G 4 $
?K$
8I 2 I_
0II . 2 II ( 8IIG8 2II / )#II5
=II II v
#I qH ! I?:3
I 3 Yw IM 7 8I9:
I5
III III 8$
q rIII $ 0 (RQIII n IIIS 3
<# 58;
I3 8I! I_ 0I ) I : 4 )
Jha, 2008
(
.
3 II UYII_
4A:
2 IIS II ;
(Oncorhynchus
mykiss)
I B: I! I5 2 I! B: 3
70I Y $ 5 A J ; I
0I ; =I WI 9
1. Biomonitoring
2 . Xenobiotic 3. Bioindicator
( I 9 D 4 : / )#5 =; A 5 M 5 8 2 Y M
= I9Y = I*8$ 8$ Q 0I 8
5 /0!
)
OECD, 1992
( 4 ; 0I 3 I / 3 =
- O
(latipes Oryzias)
= ( 8*
/ # 7 4
= I v
.IFG $ ( 9 D 4 3 S : ( 8G8 / )#I5 I5 I
8I!
)
Dizer et al., 2002
( .
. :
4 3 N ;8$8 O / )#I5 oA8 3
U8 7 ( 8* 8H b Y _ 4 3 7
x9
98 0*
U8 5 W;
3 U8I 7 8H 4 I3
YI _ 4
W Q $ 03
=;
=#I 3 4 M 0 # - PRH
= # 5 DNA
. F$
8 I 0IV DNA
=I 4 5 5: o # 3 8H ; 0II 98 II5 4 II5 0G .
/ RII1 II 2 / 0II 4 II 7
qH ! 3 7 89: Q # O T 5: 4 3
< V#I I5
c 3 4
= 8 4 7 5 ! . $ 4 I;
?K$
s- )
Hayashi et al., 1998
( .
4 > X VV
U8 2 $ 2 1
U M 2mI D 2 I$
NI I 4 I c S] I-
U0II DNA
4 II3 87 II 87 3 SII :
. II5
I ; I5 4
)
Lee & Steinert, 2003; Dhawan et
al., 2009; Valverde & Rojas, 2009
(
= F 4 5
4 II c 2II II
F
=II 87 II7 II3
4 / IIF
y b I - zI1 4 I 0M $ 5 =# 8$
I n8I <I5 I5 ! 8I!5
)
Frenzilli et al.,
(2009
. I* b Q 2 I 9 D
4 #H I5 T I5:
U8 I5 N$ N$ DNA
I3 I _ fRI 0I
=II; U8 II5 4 7 IIG { II |II $8 ; c
4 II3
Y
6=# 3 4 3 8H 0 $ ; U $ 8I I 8 7
5 =#H 5 F )
Belpaeme et al., 1998
( . 8IG
2 $ 8 ; c 0Vb 3
4 0IFS 4 T5 4
=II 8 U IIV#
II3 II 3 8IIH 4
=II ( 8II*
<9 II5
T 5:
/0I 0 I Q! Y 9 I : P0I3 I #I!
DNA
WQI I 0I ( I 9 D ; c ; X = T y / ; =G 8
= 8 4 I 7 =I NI Y
( 8IIG8 II 3 SII : ( II Q II!
U # ; 5 /0! 0 3 S : /0!
)
Conrad et
4. Comet assay
5. Ecotoxicology 6 . Micronucleus
7 . Sister chromatid exchange
* +, $ ,
* -./!
0 12 3!1#!
456 *78 9 /!
#:
) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
: = , ,1& % = > ?-0 205
al., 2000; Hartl et al., 2010
( . H
o
/0I! F I -
=II 8 II_8 4 0IIFS jII)M =II; II5 II3
4
8 ^585 0
U8 5 I3 8IH 4 I
I 8$
IQ 0
X I 0I ( 9 D ; . 5 n <3 b / #b 0 ;
2 S 5 < M 0 2 } 3
= 8 0 $ $ 3 S : ; 3
4 5:
0II ; )
Hartl et al., 2010
( . II II 4 0IIFS
/ II$8;
8IIH TII ; $ 4 0II # ( II p$ (0II { 98 II5 8IIH (A8IIu II
0II3 . ( II p$
!8 / H~
/0!
U8 7 3 YI _ 4 TI y
=I
2 8II : gDII5 .3 II;
4 II$
( )II b
(ATP)
2 3
4 ( IIII 78) b )
( DPG
.3 IIII; 2 IIII } 3
Z 7
14 s- U8 7 3 Y _ 4
•8 5 )
Kor et
al., 2009
( .
= / R1 YI _ U8 7 /0I! =I#b 7
2IQ
5
= ( 8*
8H
= 4 8H
; 0
! 8
= 0$
e =I
2 8I 78 3 I 0I $
W 8I!
. IS P I
DNA
II U8 II5
= TII r$ 0 #II (0II!
=II II5 IIm ;8
8 $ 0 I ; N # 9 0 3 ( 8I* I5
. - 4 7 0
=#!
3 A8I 4 =I DNA
=#I Q! Q]8; ( D_
I 8I!
: / )#I5 =I;
Y 9 : 4 3 .3 I; 4 0M $ 98Q98 4 I
0I
)
Dawson et al., 1998
( . 4 . - 4 7 2I
= 9 M 4 0FS
I 9 b I$ 5 T5
Y : T r$ = #
0 DNA
< ; . .V
II II3 4 4 0IIFS II
2 II5
=II;
II II G 4 :
U Q 3 4
;
$ 0 8
€ H 98 5 9 #
4 U8 I5 I3 : <3 Ib € IHpH
98 I5
0 b Y O898 Q =S 8 )
Hartl et al.,
(2010
. = G 3
4 4 0IFS I
8I$
n I5
4 7 2 G )
(FBS
=; n
= W 9 ( *8uH
.$ ; $ I5 I
4 I 4 0IFS =I 8
I3
I I 5 /0! c Y7 2 m$ I- I y
I3
0I! 4 3 8#; b 0 I5
4 I3 ( 0I 38 ; =I : I3
8 3 2 # 3 ( ; $ 5 I5
. I
= YI / RI1
: 8G8 Y;8 7 .V
4 I 4O I N
WI 1 98 I5 < 98 # I
0I ;
(Scott et al., 2005)
.
; 2 } 3
L-15
4sp 8 0 5
=I : 4
y 5 I : • 8I $ =I 4 I =I;
0I CO2
1. Deformability
U8 5 ; 3
3 4 I Vb8
/ )#I5 I
8I!
I
. Y 2 = =G8$
80 0*
/ I $ 98 I5 4 I3
U 5 Z- /0!
1994 / )#I5 I ; 2
II 0II ; )
Lakra et al., 2011
( . ( )II b b II U8II
) (PBS
U8I N Y =IS
/0I =I; I5 oA8I
!8 ( 9 D
= ; 4 S 4 3 ;
YI
=II;
y NII 8$ Y U8 II5 4 II 8II II5
:
= G 0 )
Ramsdorf et al., 2009
(.
$ =Q = =G8$
;0 ( 9 D 8 ; ‚8uH
4 0FS ! ( ? T 5: 4
Y _ U8 7 DNA
=II#b 7 ( 8II* II 3 II 3
?ƒII 4
=II 8II>
78 G 4 5 /0 c Y7 9 M 2 f8_
P03
2
= 9 D 5
= V /0 0FS =5 4
W ! ( ) b Q b U8
(PBS)
2 G n 5 2
4 7 ) (FBS
; 3
L-15
IFS 4 I 4
4 0
/ $8;
(0 8 8H 3 I UYI_
4A:
2 IS I ;
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
P0I3 Y 9 I : /
I3 4
4 ; 8 )
4 IV U8 I5 T I5:
=#I 3DNA
4 (
5 .
2 .
@8 8 -
U8 4 I3
PBS (11-PB1-100) FBS
(12-FB1-100)
4 I $ n I 87 # 4 :8 ; !
INOCLON
4 0III H III ; III
)L-15 11415-064
(
= F$ O # 8 ; ! 0!
.
2 . 1 . I 8
.III!
3 III 0III1 UYIII_
4A:
2 IIIS III ;
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
58#
100 n 7
4 I U I ! 8 5 #- : =#)3 N Z- 0 0! / )#5 . : .
8H 4 7 ZI- 3 3
; c8F NIr WI7 8-
_ I5 I
= 5 ( 8* = ^3 d 5 b 7
. T I5: gD5
=II -
5DNA 4 ZII- = II* bR 98 II5 4 IIV
8H 4 7 ) )*
= 9Y 03 I! / 7 (
2 I $
0!
. 4 F$
I : 4 3 $ µl
10 8IH
2. Phosphate Buffered Saline 3. Fetal Bovine Serum 4. Leibovitz Media 5. Baseline DNA damage
206 !
66
#$
2
% &
1392
4 IIM P 0II - =II 3 II II3 1ml
U8II
4 0IIIFS III FBS
III L-15
=b III6 PBS
X _ 4 5 0 0!
8 ^585
= * M 98 5 4 3
4 II Q II$ II!
4
# II5 IIG II7
4 0FS 0 0!
. I WI* 8b 6
12 24 48
ZI- 1 5 8IH
4 I 7 . I : 4 I3
. I5
T IIII5: 98 IIII5 4 IIIIV YIIII 4 DNA
8 II ^585 98 II5 4 II3
4 0IIFS ( 8II* /0II!
b 7 .
2 . 2 . 5 S (,
4 5 Y 4 V U8 5 3 W* 8b
c d 4Y : I^ $
1 8I / )#I5 0I!
. 2 0I
T $ $
=;
I3 I> 8I 4 I
8I3
! W #5 3
P 0 - µl
30 8 I ^585
U8 5
=#!
U8I 4 I < M I^ $
8 4 / 0 0*
= 8H
•8 r 0!
. Z^5 µl
10
2II
•8II r II 8m nA 4
WIIV# 2
II
„8Q5 Q 4 8
0! 5 . U8 5 I3 =I;
I
„8Q5 Q d
0 8 y 4 : 3
<9 5 8I
/0 U8 5 3
=;
d :
=#b 7 0 8 y 4
: 3 /0 ; ] 8
/
>
=#b 7 0 0!
) WQ!
1 ( . Z^5 / )#5
9 1 0*
/0 0I
U8 5 3
= 5 0!
)
Anderson et al., 1994
(.
) =9 1 (
% V = /0! c ! 4 3 U8 5 W;/0 4 3 U8 5 0 $ ×100
2 . 3 . R TB (, DNA
/ 0 4 7 T 5:
U8 5 DNA
3 3 8H 4
c = ( MRI* ;0I _ ; . 5
IIb 7 ( 8II*
)
Mitchelmore & Chipman,
(1998
.
= I =I*RH 8 I3
I> 8I 4
8IG8 Y _ U8 7 8 ^585 U8I
4 I3
4 0IIFS II7: II
5 / 0 0II*
(w/v)
IIDV B ~
32 - I = 1:12
•8I r 0I!
Z^I5 4
nA 3 4 .!8- 4
0I! =#r =I F$ WI _ =I;
1. Trypan blue exclusion
2. Haemocytometer
3. Low Melting Point Agarose
8I /0!
. nA I3 b I U8I =I 8 4 IM 4
Y 9 0I ;
(2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100, 10% DMSO and 10 mM Tris, pH 10.0)
/0! = F$ / $
= 1 I5 NI (0I
4 4
# 5 G I7
0I #b 7 I_
. =I
nA II3 (0II =II 20
b II U8II =IIV _
I _
(300 mM NaOH and 1 mM EDTA, pH>13)
0II! / II_
0 NII $ =II Z^II5
0! WV# 8b #Q9 0
8b #Q9 (0I =I
25
=V _ 4 4
# 5 G 7
0I! n I )
25
9 270 I
I^ : .(
nA : ZI-
I3 =I5
n M 5 b =V _ v H
4 I5 ) Z I$
4 / 0
A8
= pH
5 / 7 ( 0I! / I_
0 . n I $ ZI-
nA WIIM II3 II 0II < 0II $ )
µg/ml
20 (
d 4Y : 0 0I!
I- „8QI5 Q NI ; =I
Z 5 8w8 b
)
Zeiss, Germany
( 2 = YF
0II #b 7 II_ /03 II 8II )
WQII!
2 .(
4 II
; T I5: 4 5 I3 DNA
nA 0IM 100
U8 5
= B Ir# b Iu$ 8 T I5: gDI5
I3
0!
.
<F Q 3 # - 2 $
( IL_ =;
= / T 5: Y 8 : 4 I DNA
n III III 8III!
III ; 0III*
DNA
=I9
(%DNAT) 4
I5 )
Konca et al., 2003
(
=I;
XI I9
2 I n I YIb
V 1.5 Comet
Score™
0!
† =I9 2 =I9 T
5
5 H
;6
5 .
) 9 2 (
%DNAT = 100 × (DNAC — DNAH) ⁄ DNAC
2 . 4 . Q
8II : / )#II5 II II3 p# 8II U II 0I! 5 P8 5 P 78 98;
. 4 I I V
( )$
T 5:
2 DNA U8
4 I3 4 0IFS
3 4 87 87 U QI5 ; 4 # - 8 :
-
gD5 Z 9 95
0*
/ )#I5 ;8$ 8 :
0!
.
4. Percent tail DNA
5. Tail 6. Head
* +, $ ,
* -./!
0 12 3!1#!
456 *78 9 /!
#:
) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
: = , ,1& % = > ?-0 207
3 . U %
Y 9 : ‡ 5 I3
4 I : 4 ?KI$
8#; Ib I3 I 4
II 4 0IIFS 98 II5 4 IIV 4
II 8II
) 05 / 0
<
(P
?K$
/03 I I3 8#; b 2I WI V#
0 . U8 5 4 V 0*
I3 8IH 4 4 0IFS
/0I!
D F 4
FBS
3 L-15
4 ( I)$ . :
4 03 ! / 7 0
U8I I !
PBS
12 f ! Z- 1 5 4 0FS
/ 7 = V
03 I!
.3 I;
I ) 05 / 0
<
(P 4 IV gDI5
=II 8 98 I5 I3
4 4 0IIFS /0I!
{ . 4 IIF#
. II : 98 II5 4 IIV 2 #II
U8 II5 4 II3
4 0FS U8I /0!
0I! /03 I FBS
) 32 / 81
0*
( (0I 2I I 98 I5 4 V Y 2 # ;
U8 = •8 )PBS
24 / 46 0*
( 8 ) U 0G 1 .(
BC$
1 . 41 , * E = , 1F&
0 !12 * 3 G H!
*5 8 1 I &
) J1 , .
K *
1 , ?L2 4
0 K & K : MNO H! K-! * K-$
-!
(
BC$
2 . , #, :
41 , 3!1#!DNA 0
QR #, -0 $ K S * :
41 , 3!1#!
0 * + ,8DNA
K- ) 3!1#!
0 3 T 1U
%,
3J ! K-0 -!1$
+ ,8 -U -$ % 3J ! 41 3R 0 3:
, % DNA (
208 !
66
#$
2
% &
1392
4 -O 1 . /!
9 -U E
* J1 , 3!1#!
0
* 12 K &
) -0 $ (
* -./!
-$
0 456 78
* 9 /!
#:
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
) 1 5 (
* -./!
L-15 FBS
PBS
0 ) -0 $
a ( 03 / 2 33± / 94 03a
/ 2 33± / 94 03a
/ 2 33± / 94
6
a 95 / 3 74± / 86
a 58 / 3 45± / 87
a 80 / 3 11± / 81
12
a 46 / 4 45± / 84 12a
/ 4 54± / 83 57b
/ 6 93± / 72
24
a 53 / 6 73± / 82 03a
/ 5 34± / 84 83b
/ 6 61± / 59
48
a 38 / 7 36± / 79
a 97 / 4 32± / 81
c 16 / 7 24± / 46
( )# Z 8 A 4 )9 P M V 0 3
( )$
) 05 / 0
<
(p 5 W* 8b .
) S 2 P ± (
II5:
T U8II 7 DNA
II3 4 YII _ 3 II UYII_
A:
4
2 S I ; =I ( 8I*
I S 2 0I*
=I9 DNA
±
II P II )
WQII!
3 ( II5 /0II! / II .
8#; Ib I3 I I 4 4 0IFS
( I? 2 I } 3
T I5: 4 I W 1 2 W V#
I DNA
8I
) 05 / 0
<
.(P ( I)$ I ; . 5 e # 4 : 4 3Y 9 :
II 4 T II5: 2 II 4 0IIFS II! DNA
U8 5 3 U8 8H 4 3
4
FBS
I3 PBS
4
24 48 .
2 ( )$ 2 } 3
PBS L-15
YI II
II3 4 24 48 f II! ZII- 1 II5 4 0IIFS
8 . ( I)$ I I
4 2 I
FBS L-15
ˆ II3 2 II
II NII II3
0II /03 II II> 8II 4 .
T I5: gDI5 ; . 5 e # X 2 } 3
DNA
U8 5 4 3 4 0FS /0!
3 4
L-15
I FBS
. Yb !s7 4
)*
) 03 I!
( 0I -
Q 9 M
= 8 =;
I3 4 4 0IFS /0I!
24 PBS
f I! ZI- 1 5 4 0IFS
gDI5 qH I! . YIb
5:
F 0
) 05 / 0
<
) (P WQ!
3 .(
a
a a
b
b
a
a a
a
a a
a a
a
a
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0 6 12 24 48
% Tail DNA
) W , (
PBS L-15 FBS
BC$
3 . 1#!
X&
T YZ, ,8 + 41 SDNA 0
* 5 6 0 456 78
* /!
9
#:
) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
-./!
* K-$
41 0
* FBS L-15
= 8 PBS
* +, $ ,
* -./!
0 12 3!1#!
456 *78 9 /!
#:
) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
: = , ,1& % = > ?-0 209
4 . 8 VW , %
I
4 . 1 . Q 5 S
5 8
1 98 5 9 b UR#H = 3
/ ! 98 5 4
=;
c 3 4 87 87 >
d 4Y : I^ $
8 - I =I;
4 I / 0I 7 I 4 S] I^Q I y
4
5R- U8 5
5 - 5 /0I!
I5 . I5
=#H ! U8 5 4 V 0*
8!
. e # 4 V . 5
U8 5 5 2Q
= (0!
$
?K$
4 0FS
_ I 7 I5 .
=I V #>b I IQ 1 4
D IIF =II 9 D 2II 4 0IIFS 4
FBS L-15
0 8 4 #F ( ? 4 .
oA8*
=I - I =;
5 W Q 0
FBS
y 0! /0!
5 8
/03 I # ; 98 5 I
8I!
)
Bols et al., 2005
.(
=II; II5 /0II! c YII7 U8IIQ98 4 IIMFBS
II3 4
# : 0 #‰ )M 0 I ;
I3 I5 =I;
I I 8$
0
?KII$
=II 87 II) ( II3
U II b J II ; 4
2(ROS)
0 ; 4 78 G .
2 ( I 9 D <I5
2I I5 !
# / $ 4 I3 98 I5 4 B:
I I oA8I
I ; I -
L-15
/ I 3 =I 10
0I*
8I FBS
I_ / )#I5 I
I 7 )
Schirmer et al., 1997
.(
S P 0*
4 V U8 I5 I3 4 4 0IFS /0I!
I
G ( M 4 0FS
• $
‡8Q =I;
oA #M H8I5 1 I5 .3 ;
I5 $ I I5
)
Hartl et al., 2010
( = 9 D 2 .
= 8 3 4
4
# 5 G 7
e # = =G8$ =; 0 0! 4 0FS
98 5 4 V I3
4
FBS
)L-15
U 0IG 1 (
= >
05 4 2 4 0FS
= 8 I3 8IH 4
0! T5 3 .
7 8!
<F WI 1 2 I$
U8 7 R5 j)M I3
YI _ 4 4 0IFS I
U8 I3 4 87 I 87 4 0IFS I # A8 I5
5 = =#
K 3 8 2 ! B:
0 . - X _
4 5 U8 5 2 4
3 < > $ 8I!
.
9 D U8 5 ! 2 $A PBS
3 / 4
= V 4 0FS
I! S 2IQ =I;
5
= I 1 # A8 I5 2 I-
)PBS
159mM
(
II II =II V 4 0IIFS
0II! IIS .
( II)$
1. Cytotoxicity
2. Reactive oxygen species
8H 2 =# A8 5 5 2Q PBS
B: n8 3 =
U8 5 WH = 3
4O8I98b 8 p$ =; 8!
/ 3 5
=# 3 T $ $ 2 =
3 = 0* 5 2Q
0 0I .3 I; 98 I5 4 IV 0I* I F
)
Ramsdorf et al., 2009
.( # A8 I5 I
I3 4
4 0IIFS L-15 FBS
=II TII $ $ 322 315mM
5 =;
2 ! B: 3 8H = )
U Iv 4 I
5mM
/ 292
Salmo trutta )
Potts & Parry,
1964 (( IIII5 )
Pérez-Camps & García-
Ximénez, 2008; Ramsdorf et al., 2009 (
.
4 . 2 . DNA
= . Yb 1
=G8$
; . 5 c / )#5 =
0I #I . - ( 9 D 8I F XI D$ 3
NIII Q$
4 III3 4 0IIIFS
=III 8 III3 NIII O898 4
II G 4 : II /0II!
jII)M P0II3 S] II^Q
DNA
5 4 6 )
Hartl et al., 2010 .(
=I] 7 2 0I ]
4 II c 4 0IIFS
=II 8 II3 / )#II5 8II 4
WM ; . 5
87 87 : F I - /0I!
5 = G : =;
8$
= 4 0FS nA
3 b I
Z Y A WI _ / I 2 0I ] I TI! N (0 4
8IIb #Q9 II
II5 II; NII H nA
II3 ZII-
8b #Q9 I; / !
) Hartl et al., 2010 I3 =I (
U M 4 0FS 0
5 2Q (0 8 D ( p$
; 48S9 0 ;
T 5 . : 4 DH
8!
(Belpaeme et al., 1998) .
S] I^Q jI)M I W 81 4 I? DNA
II 0II s7 IIb f8II =II G : =II;
II
Q Y b !8 (0I /0! 4 0FS : b =;
4 0FS 5
. WI 81 2I WI $ U M 2
II?:
II!
: II II3
#H II5
=II DNA #rII5
. I- I sI- I5 ) Dawson et al., 1998 .(
= 9 D 2
; . 5 I Q!
4 I3 I HDNA
98 II5 4 #II F
4 4 0IIFS /0II!
PBS
II =II V
FBS
II L-15
.
=II II 8II
=
9 D Ramsdorf #>b I I? 4 . IQ 3
3 4 4 0IFS 87 I 87
IQ # O 4 8I# 4
= 8 98I 8I^; 3 I 8IH YI _ U8I 7 4 I3
3. In situ
210 !
66
#$
2
% &
1392
) Cyprinus carpio (
=II; II
=II 8 II3 4
4 0FS /0!
0I 8 /0 T 5: 2 # ; FBS
: Z- PBS
=I $ EDTA I_ 40I 4 I3
0 #II!
) Ramsdorf et al., 2009 (
II 9 D .
4 S 4 U8 5 3 4 P0* 58 3 ( )$
4
= 0*
= 2 DNA U8 5 3 4 4 0IFS /0I!
D IIF
1 4 HBSS L-15
4 II 4 IIG
# 5 7 0I #b 7 = # 0 /03
I3 2I
D F 4 I58 3 4 0FS P0I*
M. edulis
T5 !
= 8>
. I5 I ;
=I
(0 W_ 0M )3 TI5
0I . =I# 9 I!
I;~
II # A8 II5 =II 9 D 2II =II; II5 II3
4
4 0FS Y Yb / )#5 8
TI5 NaCl
# A8 5 Y = < I> $ /0 I5 P0* Š 98 3
0!
8 / ) Hartl et al., 2010 .(
2 I } 3 Olivier
. IIIIIQ 3
=IIIII 9 D 4
IIIII 8 8IIIIIH
= 7 3
(Ictalurus punctatus)
=;
4 3 4
24
# II5 IIG II7
U8II =II5 / )#II5 II
4 0FS 87 87
I v$ 4 I $ U8I NI W !
0II ; II U8 II5 )
Streck ( 0II 309 b - II 4
0*
#I ; ( # I5 0 5 )
IV 0I6 (
=I
(0 24 1 5 4 0FS 8 /0!
I_ =I V 8
0 F I v$ U8
0I ; #>b I I?
U8 5 4 4 #F I3
8IH 4 =I
( I 9 D 8I>
I 98Q98 98 5 )
Olivier et al., 2011 .(
= 9 D =I; S 4 Anderson
. IQ 3 n I
0II T II5: gDII5
=#II!
4 U8 II5DNA
4 II3
4 =; 8H 58) 9 4
# I5 G I7
II
= II ; II IIF] (0II
٢RPMI 1640
4 0FS 8 /0!
$ p$
I 2 0 Q /03
1. Hanks Balanced Salt Solution 2. Roswell Park Memorial Institute
U8 I5 #I . - ( 9 D FG I3
I58) 9 4
8H =
0 #I TI5 I ; . I5 N ;
(Anderson et al., 1997) II .
Narayanan
. Yb . Q 3 Q!
4 I3 =#I!
4 DNA
! 3 $ c YI7
0I ; ) Narayanan et
al., 2001 . (
oA II #M U IIM II3 =II 0II*
4 II
T 5:
y ? ! DNA
8 $ 0 I ; . I$ < V#
! 98 # 3 5 ; 4 .
= S ( 1 2
=; 8G U #M Y
A 0Iw (A8Iu
W* M H85
5
* H =;
N I ;8$8 O 0I
(0 U8 4 0FS
/0I! 0I 98$ I U8 I5
0!
) Hartl et al., 2010 .(
2 I- 4 I WI 9 NI
T 5: gD5 8 U8 5 DNA
4 3 4 0IFS /0I!
I 8LMFBS
/0I ; I3 4 Im$ - 4
= 1 06 9 b
^ $ 5 !
Q 1
U8 5 < Y : 2 3
8H 4 4 78 G
; I 0 =I;
5 2Q T 5: =
8 O 8I!
)
Ramsdorf
et al., 2009
. ( I5 = = 6 b 2 U M 3 I3
4
II 4 #II .
=II#b II3 4 II 9 D II6 M II
03 =;
/ 0 7 I 4 I5:
T U8 I5 DNA
I3 4
3 8H 5 2Q
4 I YI = I $
?KI$
! 4 0FS
= 8 3 I 7 I_ . I : WI _ .
f8
= 8 3 2 ! B: 3 8H 4 8$
III$
48 T III5: 0III 1 III5 III
DNA
98 F 4 L-15
! $FBS
4 G
# 5 7 Q $ 4 0FS I;
I 2I =I;
IQ
<# 58; # . - n I3
I : 4 I
; I 8
F 0 ! 3 / )#5 98Q98 0 ; 4 I 0M $ I_ . YIb T I5
I #1
2
= 87 ( 9 D 4 ; 8
0! 03 8H .
* +, $ ,
* -./!
0 12 3!1#!
456 *78 9 /!
#:
) Oncorhynchus mykiss (
: = , ,1& % = > ?-0 211
Reference
1. Anderson D, Yu T W, Phillips B, Schmezer P (1994) “The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the Comet assay,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 307: 261- 271.
2. Anderson D, Yu T W, Dobrzy ska M M, Ribas G, Marcos R (1997) “Effects in the comet assay of storage conditions on human blood,” Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis, 17: 115-125.
3. Belpaeme K, Cooreman K, Kirsch-Volders M (1998) “Development and validation of the in vivo alkaline comet assay for detecting genomic damage in marine flatfish,” Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 415:
167-184.
4. Bols N, Dayeh V, Lee L, Schirmer K (2005) “Use of fish cell lines in the toxicology and ecotoxicology of fish. Piscine cell lines in environmental toxicology,” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes, 6: 43-84.
5. Conrad K F, Robertson R, Boag P (2000)
“Difficulties storing and preserving tyrant flycatcher blood samples used for genetic analyses,” The Condor, 102: 191-193.
6. Dawson M N, Raskoff K A, Jacobs D K (1998)
“Field preservation of marine invertebrate tissue for DNA analyses,” Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 7: 145-152.
7. Dhawan A, Bajpayee M, Parmar D (2009)
“Comet assay: a reliable tool for the assessment of DNA damage in different models,” Cell biology and toxicology, 25: 5-32.
8. Dizer H, Wittekindt E, Fischer B, Hansen P D (2002) “The cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of surface water and wastewater effluents as determined by bioluminescence, umu-assays and selected biomarkers,” Chemosphere, 46: 225- 233.
9. Frenzilli G, Nigro M, Lyons B P (2009) “The Comet assay for the evaluation of genotoxic impact in aquatic environments,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 681:
80-92.
10. Hartl M G J, Grigson S J W, Sinet E (2010)
“Maintenance of bivalve hemocytes for the purpose of delayed DNA strand break assessment using the
comet assay,” Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 51: 64-68.
11. Hayashi M, Ueda T, Uyeno K, Wada K, Kinae N, Saotome K, Tanaka N, Takai A, Sasaki Y, Asano N (1998) “Development of genotoxicity assay systems that use aquatic organisms,”
Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 399: 125-133.
12. Hussein H, Amer R, Gaballah A, Refaat Y, Abdel-Wahab A (2008) “Pollution Monitoring for Lake Qarun,” Advances in Environmental Biology, 2: 70-80.
13. Jha A N (2008) “Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay,”
Mutagenesis, 23: 207-221.
14. Konca K, Lankoff A, Banasik A, Lisowska H, Kuszewski T, Gózdz S, Koza Z, Wojcik A (2003) “A cross-platform public domain PC image-analysis program for the comet assay,”
Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 534: 15-20.
15. Kor D J, Van Buskirk C M, Gajic O (2009) “Red blood cell storage lesion,” Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 9: 21-27.
16. Lakra W, Swaminathan T R, Joy K (2011)
“Development, characterization, conservation and storage of fish cell lines: a review,” Fish Physiology and Biochemistry: 1-20.
17. Lee R, Steinert S (2003) “Use of the single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay for detecting DNA damage in aquatic (marine and freshwater) animals,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 544: 43-64.
18. Mitchelmore C, Chipman J (1998) “DNA strand breakage in aquatic organisms and the potential value of the comet assay in environmental monitoring,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 399: 135-147.
19. Narayanan S, O'Donovan M, Duthie S (2001)
“Lysis of whole blood in vitro causes DNA strand breaks in human lymphocytes,” Mutagenesis, 16:
455.
20. OECD (1992) Guideline for the testing of chemicals: (Part 203). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Adopted by the Council on July 17, 1995.
212 !
66
#$
2
% &
1392
21. Olivier H M, Dale R, Jenkins J A (2011) “Blood Samples Stabilized in the Field for Laboratory Analyses after 24 Hours,” American Fisheries Society 141st Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington.
22. Pérez-Camps M, García-Ximénez F (2008) Osmolarity and composition of cell culture media affect further development and survival in zebrafish embryos, Animal-Cambridge University Press, 2:
595.
23. Potts W T W, Parry G (1964) Osmotic and ionic regulation in animals. Osmotic and ionic regulation in animals.
24. Ramsdorf W A, Guimarães F S F, Ferraro M V M, Gabardo J, Trindade E S, Cestari M M (2009)
“Establishment of experimental conditions for preserving samples of fish blood for analysis
with both comet assay and flow cytometry,”
Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 673: 78-81.
25. Schirmer K, Chan A, Greenberg B, Dixon D, Bols N (1997) “Methodology for demonstrating and measuring the photocytotoxicity of fluoranthene to fish cells in culture,” Toxicology in vitro, 11: 107- 113.
26. Scott K L, Lecak J, Acker J P (2005)
“Biopreservation of red blood cells: past, present, and future,” Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 19:
127-142.
27. Valverde M, Rojas E (2009) “Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the Comet assay,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 681: 93-109.
