• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

بررسی میزان پوشش بیوم‌های خشکی ایران به وسیله مناطق حفاظت شده

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "بررسی میزان پوشش بیوم‌های خشکی ایران به وسیله مناطق حفاظت شده"

Copied!
15
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

$ %&

581 595

! " #

$ %&

( ) * +1 2

،*

. / 0

$ 2 +3 4

1 - ! "#$ %& ' ( )

2 - #$ %& ' ( ) +,

3 - ! "#$ %& ' ( )

4 - ! "#$ %& ' ( )

)

) *

: 22 / 7 / 1394 - 0 12 * :

30 / 3 / 1395 (

4 567 8 9 :; < : : =1: > %? @ < A B ; C D > %? @ 71 E

$ : 7 F .

E D GG 7 < G E H I J K LC

1 7 1 A

H M > %? 1N1 D > %? @ A

1O H PC N 1 P 1

Q ;

; P ) MC .

S ? P 7 F T 1U B

K1 E H P 16A P: D: :> %? @ PG ;

1 V

@ A

> %? E D > %?

5CW 1

;

; P ) O Q .

;

; H X

$ J

> %?

16A

H X T K1

D V 6C

$ % H E E B T 1U K1

E H 16A

;1

$ J

> %?

1N

PN1 P P9 H X

$ J

> %?

16A E Y DH %

D H

1N

$ J E

; D P YDH 5C :> %?

S E

;

<

P ;1 W

@

> %?

D 16A

<

Z5 1 PN1 Q M . 6C S ? P 7 F [ C -

K1 P 1 H D > %? @ PG ; P T 1U B < A C H1A @ E H B%GV

< < D :

K1:

P:

U D > %? @ W P ;1 E \ 17 K1 X 1 V 16 5 6

. ] H G E 5A U 16 5 6 U <

K1 E H

C H1A @ E H B%GV H P 1 ^1G_ E 5GM N ` <5U E 5GM N P 1 H

a :? D P ;1 X6b @ E H

< S ? K1

G E 5A U PG ; P T 1U B < A 0 P H D H

.

; E S P6JC

K1:

:H E 1:6A P:

1 V X E

c _ C

@

> %?

DN D O Q .

56 / :

D > %? @ K1

dO B 7 CW .

<%G ea1f D 1C*

02632229683:

g : sohrab.ashrafi@ut.ac.ir

(2)

1 - 9

h C E 1 C =1 P

C B) G g 7

Z :: ;1A ::

:: E ::H D::C

) ::6 B

) Rudrigues & Brooks, 2007 E :5 _ (

: C

7 ) ij: < ) :O 6 U a ? C C E H -

E ::H 1::N1 :: =1:: ::> %?

::;

) Rondinini et al., 2011 (.

<:

: c :_ C

D P ;1 D > %? @

DC 1 :9

ED GA

< k1 <

E H H < : :G

:GG 7

D:: G ::> %? E ::

$D::

::

:: =1 D::

) Rudrigues & Brooks, 2007 TC (.

:> %?

E : lb : : Y 1 V P M % ; PC1O H C\1 P 6 U Arau´jo et al., 2004)

.( P

19 C1 a m 1 V a ;

) (1974 P: C

"

C :

A

"

) Man and Biosphere

> %? E (

bn 5N ; ; A E H O A S

PA Y O E oC U C :5N ? E H 1:

.

C 5N p D &

$ ? T?

WWF) C K1 P C (

P: ? -

:::H ) Ecoregions (

1::: C :::S Olson & )

Dinerstein, 1998 < (

q C PJ PA ED:

E :H

P ? C D: C 1 E : :Or P:C1O :)

M = 1C K DA H D C G& E H

.

D:: ::> %? @ ::

D::?

13 sF::; D::&

96b E H T 1U < A D H

1:N <:

jb t O T 1U 5N1 g Q : 1

E :

PC1O 1 H D: :> %? @ : ; 1:N

) Le

Saout et al., 2013 :: 71 E 5::67 8 ::9 .(

<: :A B ; C D > %? @ @ ::

::; < :: :: =1:: ::> %?

) Forero-Medina & Joppa, 2010 (

P9 :: :: W .

:C1O > %? K \ A 1N1 > %?

P :H

M H u E 5:6H rU =1:S1 <: ; E

I J E D :GG 7 < G E H

D: K :LC

; . 1 P m a Rodrigues 9 H

) 2004 P: (

> %? 5N D > %? @ A ; =1 5

:5CW P: 7 F [ : C D: b U

%? @ P9 6C D: :>

1:N1 :A

1C :N :O <: =1: > %? E K \ : C C :5N sF;

. Forero-Medina Joppa

) 2010 P 7 F (

E :> %? @ A ; P

> %? GA D \ : > %? 7 @

D b U 5N sF;

T < JJ <

K1:

> %? E \ 7 P:C1O k1

:Fb E :H

(3)

DC 1 C 5 6 U 16A <

Araújo. 9 H

) 2007 (

: BN P : D: :> %? @ : :A ; P E : E :5 :H O :> %?

D: b U .

: =1: > %? E 6C 5CW P 7 F [ C 7 F 1 PJF gQ D? P

36 D > %? PJF

1 DH 1b C D DN .

:M P 7 F X Wiersma

Nudds )

2009 :> %? @ : :A ; P (

> %? E D D b U C A DC U

. [ C

gQ D:? 6C B C 5CW P 7 F 22

:> %? P:JF

: v7 : ? D 2500

: : 1:G A E

:; : C 1: C A DC U k1 > %?

.

< 6

$ 7 F A

1w? KDV 1w?

M PC1O P:C1O =1 < 6 E H

E P9 :

D > %? @ 16 P ) O qC

) Limiñana

et al., 2012; Virkkala et al., 2013 :GV.(

Z:x

) E 5 j P:A :C

:5N E : :A :;

PC1O > %? D > %? @ M : :H

-

H

\ 7 E 16

1: A Z5 <

:::; P::: ) O :::Q :::;

) Mehri et al.,

2014;Yousefi et al., 2015; Kafash et al., (.2016 1: =1 =1 T A U E1M7

: G :9 * : b : < : GQ k

<

% 1 < : sF;

) Lominio,

(.2010 C MC 9 E H

71 y1F:; :> %?

d K D C 1 PA ; < C 5N E H

H M

1 ::N P::C1 C ::5N 1 g:: C E :: E

D:: W E ::H

D C > %?

. P:H g 70

K1:5% P:A E j :

:: bn ::O ::5C 1::N P::& V P:: ::U 9 :: E ::H

g9 E P U 6C P j V E ) zN E : O

P C A E H O bn P9 aD MAB

D . Z : ;1A c :_ C YDH 19: C1 Y : E :H

P:J A ij : E :H GQ :N ED:

D: A P:{ 5N .

a :; 1:q <: E : 1975

:: ) zN :: @ :: P::6JC E I1::719 17 Y DH P PN1 5N P ;1 > %? E H

D 6_

8

A l_6 D V GQ

. P6JC <

P 5N X 9% E 14

T : K1: d

200 ) ) zN oC U 1: V P PA A ZH

Z ;1A c _ C P U P6JC :; | Y E H

: : P: :5N 1:N1 H M =1

g9 I ; :; :5N =1 > %? E O

) Madjnoonian et al., 2005 .(

Olson 9 H

) 2001 P6JC( K1:

E :H E :H

(4)

A YDH <

:> %? E P6JC X P D ;

DC 1 C P 5 =1 .

< ] H :> %? P

$ ? T?

PJ X M : E ED

:5N E :H

K LC 14

H M : D: V d )

biome ( E :

< PA D ) < A 14

K1 d T

1N W )

a DN 1 2 .(

5N P C

> %?

$ J T PC O E

5 6 U < sF; =1 > %? E 1 C } b E H $ J < X H PA ;

a C B C % > %? Y DH D c _ C

D C

. :S ? a ? 2

/ 10 D:&

: ? :

; D KjV D > %?

. ^ : P:A 7 1;

y :F W c :_ C E :H D > %? @ d: D: c _ C @ W PA ; < 16 E :H

|G _ K1

: : 16A E H O

:C uD :O

@

> %?

D b

d -K1

H E

T 1U Q :;

W : :;

PA

> %?

; P B D&

:

<

D:

E H X

= 1C K1 :H :;

D :;

: b : u 17 9 PA LCW

: ~:%? :> %? E :H

M d PA LCW ; 16A 1N1 E H

:% Y DH D > %? @ $ J X H a C E S •7 D A

:;

X: :H :;

X H D > %? @ K1

E H 1:6A

Q ; 1 : O

P: 1: : :> %? Y D:H

C 5N K1

D :; 1:6A E H .

G:

"

B : =1S1 < H OW E : : H D:C 1

D 16A D > %? @ W P ;1 .

2 -

* $

2 - 1 -

& :

" #

ED PJ P ) O $ 1& E H P ? C K1

E H

- 96b

6C < E H PA DH

200 ) zN oC U

07 Q 14 K1

< sF; D V 1N

) Olson et al., 2001 16A PA(

15 oC U

T K1

1N )

a DN 1 (.

g9 1

Q1 X H K1

6C 16A sF; H

DHD .

(5)

a DN 1 . K C K1 5CW ; ) a H P E H

: -)

, ; < 6 7

1 Temperate Grassland, Savannas and shrublands (TGSS) P7D E H B%GV

C ; 1 P H

2 Flooded Grasslands and Savannas (FGS)

j ; @ E H B%GV C ;

3 Montane Grassland and shrublands (MGS)

P 1 C H1A E H B%GV H

4 Deserts and Xeric Shrublands (DXS)

H P 1 X6b @ E H

5 Temperate conifer forest (TCF)

gM N ` C 1; E H P7D

Temperate Broadleaf and Mixed Forest (TBMF) 6 gM N

<5U E H P7D ` gM N

E H 1G_

^

=3 1 .

$4>?

-) ) 6 7 Olson et al., 2001 (

(6)

2 - 2 -

PJ 58 g 16A D > %? @ P9 G&

5A U E G k G

MH U E H

?

$

T?

@

> %?

D D

g9 ) 2 ( Q1

@

> %?

D 16A 6C

DH .

k PJ D > %? @ PJ 58 <

W €DC ; g 7 P G g Q H

D P •O A $ ; 1 1U Z68 .

=3 2 . $4>?

1 @)

A7 * . / %0 (0 B 0 6 7

C * 2 6 7

(7)

A B ; 1q P D > %? @

T 1U K1

dO B 7 CW K C P H

Gap Analysis)

( D % ; .

; dO B 7 CW

T 1U B 5N

PC1O H O 1N H

;1 D > %? @

PA P J @

1

) zN =1

^ > %? @

D M K LC )

Scott et al., 1993; Jennings,

2000 .( a C P dO B 7 CW % ; Q

A E D J < ) @ P9

Z H D > %?

<

A < 1 i

> %? @ P9 =1 k1 > %? E D P ;1 PC1M8 D )

Scott et al., 1993;

Jennings, 2000; Rodrigues et al., 2004 .(

P9 P6JC P 7 F <

D > %? @

P6JC K1

H 16A E o•; E •O Z5

B

C 1• H D > %? @

K1 E H 16A

B) K C ArcGis 9.3

D P ; .

3 .

< =0

DC O 16A 15

oC U PA ; |G _

T K1

DC M Q .

C [ g& ? 7 CW

B

dO 6C PA

6 d K1

1N1

D&

H E

%

$ T 1U

@

> %?

D Q DC . a DN 2

; X H K1

H

X H > %? D&

5CW @ P9

DHD 6C 16A D > %?

. B

;

K1 H PA

> %?

$ J P;

PC O

@

> %?

D Q P ) O 6

/ 5 D&

P 1 H

H1A E H B%GV C

4 / 21 D&

gM N E H

<5U P7D ` gM N

E H 1G_

^

; $ % .

PA DHD 6C a DN < [ C < ] H

K1 P 1 C H1A E H B%GV H E H B%GV

P7D C ; 1

P H B

%? D&

D >

; D& A K1

D . g9 3

1 C C1 ; D&

@

> %?

D E H X

K1 E H DHD T C

.

(8)

< .E 2 . , 1

/ %0 . F 7 -)

6 7

: - ?

-) ,

) 37 ( / %0.&

.

1 P7D E H B%GV

C ; 1 P H 6427830

4 / 560702 (%8.7)

gM N 2 P7D ` <5U E H gM N

E H 1G_

^ 40206684

8629813 (%21.4)

3 P 1

C H1A E H B%GV H 14943236

1 / 843131 (%5.6)

4 H

P 1 X6b @ E H 93795735

10929084 (%11.6)

5 gM N

P7D ` C 1; E H 6344246

1 / 729540 (%11.4)

6 j ; @ E H B%GV

C ; 721605

2 / 132534 (%18.3)

=3 3 . ) ? I)

$ .&

0 7 -)

$J / %0

@

$ ; K , . 7 = J - ? 6 -)

< .E $ 1 ) L)E .

a DN 3 B

;

> %?

H K1

P 9%

X

$ J P;

PC O

@

> %?

D

6C DH

. D > %? @

; < 6

> %?

K1 j ; @ E H B%GV

C ;

< A

> %? DJ K1

P 1 H

C H1A E H B%GV DC16 g

. MH U E H

(9)

$ ?

> %? D& < 6 T?

K1

5GM N E

^1G_

<5U

` P7D D& < A

> %?

K1 H B%GV P 1

H E C H1A

DC M .

> %? D& < 6 G E 5A U K1

gM N P7D ` C 1; E H D& < A

K1 > %?

H B%GV P 1

H E C H1A

DC M . %O 1 =1 L K1

H B%GV P 1

> %? @ B < A C H1A E H D > %? @ PJ P; X H D

MH U ; G E H € U T? $ ? E H

) g9 4 .(

< .E 3 . 0 1 / %0 . 6 M7 A7 * B 0

(0 6 MJ * 2 7 F -)

6 7

:

-?-)

01 /%0.

.&1 /%0.

0A7*B0(0

A7*.&B0(0

06MJ*2

6MJ*.&2

1 P7D E H B%GV

C ; 1 P H 333888

1 / 5 106828 6

/ 1 119985 8

/ 1

gM N 2 P7D ` <5U E H gM N

H E

1G_

^ 2250622

5 / 5 5766718 3

/ 14 612471 5

/ 1

3 P 1

C H1A E H B%GV H 724414

8 / 4 85665 5

/ 0 33050 2

/ 0

4 H

P 1 X6b @ E H 5481601

8 / 5 4760191 05

/ 5 687291 7

/ 0

5 gM N

P7D ` C 1; E H 532675

3 / 8 143840 2

/ 2 53024 3

/ 8

6 H B%GV

j ; @ E 103502 C ;

3 / 14 29031 02

/ 4 0 0

(10)

=3 4 . ) ? 1 .&

/ %0 . 7 -)

$ 3%

F 1 / %0 . M7 A7 * 6 0 B (0 MJ * 6 2 - ? 6

7 = J -)

< .E $ 1 ) L)E .

4 -

>?

" 5 @ =0

c _ C D DN D > %? @

TL ; D

A D > %? @

G ) < 5 9

; E 5 7 )

> %?

Bruner et al., )

200; Rodrigues et al., 2004; Brooks et al., 2004; Araújo et al., 2007; Geldmann et al., 2013; Le Saout et al., 2013 9 < ] H (

PxDx < 5 E H

5 7 > %?

E C

; . @ P9 A B S ? P 7 F

1 > %?

=1 > %? 1N K1

-

) O Q ; 1 16A E H .

A B X H ;

K1 $ J 16A E H

E E D $\ J 9 < PA ; > %?

D > %? @ A B ; > %?

PC1O T? $ ? |G _ E H )

Limiñana et al.,

2012; Virkkala et al., 2013 M (

Z5 E H

Forero-Medina & Joppa, 2010)

% ; ( D

; .

X c1GF @ B ;

; P D > %? @ } b 1 A D > %? @ A 1 PC1O > %? E

qC DC U .

(11)

S ? P 7 F [ C 6C

> %? @ ; PA

D K1

E $ % M D9 16A E H

. H PA LCW K1

} b E 5 Or E

PV1 L E

PC1O P 2 E 1C N H O E H

; ) )

Lomolino et al., 2010 PJ H (

; % D Y DH E > %? @

<

K1

; qC D 16A E H

B C T 1U =1C

sF; P > %? @ PJ

; C 9 D

.

X H ; ; H 16A > %? $ J

X T K1

$ % 6C D V E H

T 1U B E K1

;1 16A E H

X H P9 P PN1 1N > %? $ J % Y DH E 16A > %? $ J

1N D H YDH P D ; E $ J

< ; E S 5C @ W P ;1

Q PN1 1 Z5 < 16A D > %?

M . P6JC K1

X 1 V P 16A E H

B D D DN > %? @ c _ C E X H X H > %? $ J

K1 H E

C 9 D? P 16A D;

. S ? a ?

; A

K1 H

X6b @ E H P 1

T 1U PJ

€ U

H E G Q < PA 7 ?

K1 M

PC1O b 1O ;W ‚ GU 1 18 5 E H

;W ; PC1O PG N H PA U E H

DC

16A ƒ JC Fb D

) Ziaie, 2005 .(

<

M < ] H K1 ODC U

% 2

E D C 1 „ 18 1H

; ) Scott et

al., 1975 qC (

ODCBb PC1O \ =1

E H

; E N 1b X DC Anderson, )

1999 MH U ; .(

T? $ ? E H K1

C H1A @ E H P 1 H B%GV €DC

< PA 7 ? D K1

=1 qC PFJC

E 1C N H O H

; . 6C p1) 1

PA DHD 1

D > %? $ J K1

E H

16A C 9 .

[ C =1 L 6C P 7 F <

; ; DH K1

T 1U E H

> %? P9 )

1 C 3 ( E H DC 1

D G y1F; D > %? @ P ;1 .

(12)

@ P ;1 16 5 6 U D An [ C D > %?

C H1A @ E H B%GV K1

O Q 17 .

E 5A U 16 5 6 U < ] H

G K1

E 5GM N ` <5U E 5GM N E H

P 1 ^1G_

C H1A @ E H B%GV H

P 1 H a ? D P ;1 X6b @ E H

< S ? K1

T 1U B < A 0 P H

H G E 5A U PG ; P D

.

|G _ < JJ 1 A O I ; 16A

-

DC A ED Z J E 1C N E H .

a m E Ziaie

) 2005 D ( 8 DC U E H M d

; Scott a ;

1990 8

d

ODC U E H M Anderson

a ;

1999 D

13 PJF E X ) O1fN1 B )

;1;

DC A P{

) Madjnoonian et al.,

(2005 . } b O X 5 j < X H

5 ; D Q qC D

C

d X ; I ; GA ED

O H E

5 ) O $ 1& < A gA E PA P]CW @ P

) P 1 =1N Proches & Ramdhani, 2012

(

O K LC .

@ 1 V P ODC U Z5 X

> %? PJ YDH ) P 2 BL

ODC U > %?

; ) Evans, 1994 P 7 F (

S ? ODC U Z5 @

1

; ) MC Q

X P 6H rU E

> %? ;

DC 1 g

; B C 1• H

@

Z5 ODC U K1

E H 16A D

< ] H

1 P 5 P6JC x

=1 ODC U sF;

16A

B 1• H

@ Z5 ODC U

@

x

=1 ODC U 1

; Q A

@ Z5 ODC U

> %?

=1 ODC U

Q TL ; 1 .

S ? P 7 F DC 1

A ; O $ 7 F E < _C O M > %? 16A D > %? @ H

$ ? 16A T?

D D W .

A 0 $ B

_ & E QW D C D K \ 1b ODC MC P E1L6C -

M6C =1

19G ZC b 5 P E1L6C 1b

- 5N 5%& & M6C =1

D C C DQ 96 S ? P7 J P 5 E E 9 H .

(13)

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. C., 1999. The Lizard of Iran" Society for the study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Oxford, Ohio.

Araújo, M. B, Lobo, J. M., Moreno, J. C., 2007. The Effectiveness of Iberian Protected Areas in Conserving Terrestrial Biodiversity," Conservation Biology 21, 1423–1432.

Araújo, M., Densham, B, P. J., Williams, P. H., 2004.

Representing species in reserves from patterns of assemblage diversity. Journal of Biogeography 31, 1037–1050.

Brooks, T. M., Bakarr, M. I., Boucher, T., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., Hilton-Taylor, C., Hoekstra, J. M., Moritz, T., Olivieri, S., Parrish, J., Pressey, R. L., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Sechrest, W., Stattersfield, A., Strahm W., Stuart S. N., 2004. Coverage Provided by the Global Protected-Area System: Is It Enough?"

BioScience 54, 1081-1091.

Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice, R.E., da Fonseca, G.A.B., 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity," Science 291, 125–128.

Evans, M.I., 1994. Important bird areas in the Middle East," BirdLife International Cambridge, UK.

Forero-Medina, G., Joppa, L., 2010. Representation of Global and National Conservation Priorities by Colombia's Protected Area Network. PLoS ONE 5:

e13210. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013210.

Geldmann, J., Barnes, M., Coad, L.,Craigie, I.

D.,Hockings M. Burgess, N. D., 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines," Biological Conservation 161, 230-238.

Jennings, M., 2000. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results." Landscape Ecology 15, 5-20.

Kafash, A., Kaboli, M., Köhler, G., Yousefi, M., Asadi A., 2016. Ensemble distribution modeling of the Mesopotamian spiny-tailed lizard (Saara loricata) in Iran, An insight into the impact of climate change. Turkish Journal of Zoology 40, 262- 271.

Le Saout, S., Hoffmann, M., Shi, Y., Hughes, A., Bernard, C., Brooks, T. M., Bertzky, B., Butchart, S.

H. M., Stuart, S. N., Badman T., Rodrigues A. S. L., 2013. "Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation." Science 342, 803-805.

Limiñana, R., Soutullo, A., Arroyo B., Urios V., 2012. Protected areas do not fulfil the wintering habitat needs of the trans-Saharan migratory Montagu’s harrier. Biological Conservation 145, 62- 69.

Lomolino, M. V., Riddle, B. R., Whittaker R.J., Brown, J. H., 2010. "Biogeography." Fourth edition.

Sinauer Associates, Inc.

Madjnoonian, H., Kiabi, B. H., Danesh, M., 2005.

"Readings in zoogeography of Iran, " Vol. 2. Iran Department of Environment Publication, Tehran (in Persian).

Mehri, A., Salmanmahiny, A., Mirkarimi, S. H., Rezaei, H. R., 2014. Use of optimization algorithms to prioritize protected areas in Mazandaran Province of Iran. Journal for Nature Conservation 22, 462-470.

Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G.V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J.

C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao P., Kassem K. R., 2001. "Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity." BioScience 51, 933-938.

Olson, D., Dinerstein, E., 1998. "The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions." Conservation Biology 12, 502–515.

Procheş, Ş., Ramdhani, S., 2012. "The World's Zoogeographical Regions Confirmed by Cross-Taxon Analyses" BioScience 62, 260-270.

Rodrigues, A. S. L., Brooks, T. M., 2007. "Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates." Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, 713-737.

Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., Long, J. S., Marquet, P. A., Pilgrim, J. D., Pressey, R. L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W.,

(14)

Stuart, S. N., Underhill, L. G., Waller, R. W., Watts M. E. J., Yan, X., 2004. "Effectiveness of the global

protected area network in representing species diversity." Nature 428, 640-643.

Rodrigues, A. S. L., H. R. AkÇAkaya, S. J.

Andelman, M. I. Bakarr, L. Boitani, T. M. Brooks, J.

S. Chanson, L. D. C. Fishpool, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., Marquet, P. A., J. D.

Pilgrim, R. L. Pressey, J. A. N. Schipper, W. E. S.

Sechrest, S. N. Stuart, L. G. Underhill, R. W. Waller, M. E. J. Watts, X. I., Yan, E., 2004. "Global Gap Analysis: Priority Regions for Expanding the Global Protected-Area Network," BioScience 54, 1092-1100.

Scott, D. A., 1990. Birds in Iran. In Encyclopedia Iranica, 4 (ed Yarshater), Routledge and Kegan Paul London.

Scott, D. A., Hamadani, H. M., Mirhosseyni, A. A., 1975. The birds of Iran. Department of the Environment (in Persian).

Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B.

Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F.

D'Erchia, T. C. Edwards, Jr., Ulliman, J., Wright R.

G., 1993. "Gap Analysis: A Geographic Approach to Protection of Biological Diversity," Wildlife Monographs 123, 3-41.

Virkkala R., Heikkinen, RK., Fronzek, S., Leikola, N., 2013. "Climate Change, Northern Birds of Conservation Concern and Matching the Hotspots of Habitat Suitability with the Reserve Network." PLoS ONE, 8: e63376. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063376 Wiersma, Y. F., Nudds, T. D., 2009. "Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: The contribution of existing protected areas." Biological Conservation 142, 1639-1646.

Yousefi, M., Ahmadi, M., Nourani, E., Behrooz, R., Rajabizadeh, M., Geniez, P., Kaboli, M., 2015.

Upward Altitudinal Shifts in Habitat Suitability of Mountain Vipers since the Last Glacial Maximum.

PLoSONE10(9):e0138087.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.

0138087.

Ziaie, H., 2005. "A field guide to the Mammals of Iran," Wildlife Educational Center Press, Tehran (in Persian).

(15)

Protected area coverage for terrestrial biomes in Iran

Masoud Yousefi1, Sohrab Ashrafi2*, Anooshe Kafash3, Lida Davar4

1. Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran , Iran

2. Assistant Professor, Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

3. PhD student, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

4. PhD student, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

Received: 14-Oct.-2015 Accepted: 19-Jun.-2016

Abstract

Efficiency of the existing protected areas network in conservation of biodiversity is one of the most important challenges of protected areas custodians. Despite there are numerous articles on evaluating the efficiency of the protected areas for conserving the habitat and species on national and international scales, however, in Iran this subject has not been studied yet. The aim of the present study is to investigate the efficiency of Iran’s protected areas in country's biome protection. The results showed large differences in country's biomes coverage by protected areas categories. Given that each category of protected area has different goals and existence of all categories is essential to achieve the goal of biodiversity conservation, it is recommended that in the future development of protected areas in country, the appropriate coverage of each biome should be considered. This means that the map of country's biomes is suggested being the basis for selection of new protected areas in country.

Keywords: Protected area, Biome, Iran, Gap analysis.

*Corresponding Author: E-mail: sohrab.ashrafi@ut.ac.ir Phone: +982632229683

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabaee University, Tehran, Iran Received: October 18, 2017; Accepted: February

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran Received: 8 November, 2015;Accepted: 9 April, 2016 Abstract One of the