• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Determination of Crisis Areas of Precipitation in Iran for Period of 2021-2040 by Climate Change

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Determination of Crisis Areas of Precipitation in Iran for Period of 2021-2040 by Climate Change"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Homepage: https://jwim.ut.ac.ir/

University of Tehran Press

Determination of Crisis Areas of Precipitation in Iran for Period of 2021-2040 by Climate Change

Saman Javadi1 | Hossein Yousefi2 | Ali Moridi3 | Hossein Khajehpour4 | Touraj Fathi5

1. Corresponding Author, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Aburaihan Campus, University of Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

2. Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

3. Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

4. Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Energy Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

5. Deputy of Soil and Water Conservation and Management, Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran. E-mail:

[email protected]

Article Info ABSTRACT

Article type:

Research Article

Article history:

Received: 7 June 2021 Received in revised form:

26 June 2021

Accepted: 28 September 2021 Published online: 2 July 2023

Keywords:

Iran, GCM, RCP2.6, RCP8.5.

The climate change effect on future precipitation (2040-2021) of Iran is investigated in this study. For this purpose, the results of three general circulation models (GCM) named GFDL-ESM2M, HadGEM2-ES and IPSL-CM5A-LR were analyzed for two scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions RCP2.6 and RCP8.5.

CCT model and daily precipitation data of the base period (1986-2019) were used to downscale and bias correction of future daily precipitation data. According to the annual results, the weighted average of annual precipitation of rain gauges due to all scenarios except RCP8.5 in the IPSL-CM5A-LR model was increasing. The weighted average of seasonal precipitation in winter increased in all of the studied climate change conditions, but in other seasons the amount of precipitation decreased or increased. The highest increase in the weighted average of seasonal precipitation was in winter due to the RCP2.6 scenario and GFDL-ESM2M model (23 mm). The highest decrease in the weighted average of seasonal precipitation was in autumn due to the RSP8.5 scenario and IPSL-CM5A-LR (10.5 mm). Slight changes in mean precipitation, on the other hand, a sharp decrease in minimum precipitation (446 mm due to G3S4) and a sharp increase in maximum precipitation (233 mm due to G2S1), indicate the occurrence of severe extreme events (drought and flood) in the future.

Cite this article: Javadi, S., Yousefi, H., Moridi, A., Khajehpour, H., & Fathi, T. (2023). Determination of Crisis Areas of Precipitation in Iran for Period of 2021-2040 by Climate Change. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 13 (2), 311-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2021.325229.881

© The Author(s). Publisher: University of Tehran Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.22059/jwim.2021.325229.881

(2)

تارﺎﺸ ا نا هﺎﮕﺸ اد

یرﺎﯿآ و بآ

Homepage: https://jwim.ut.ac.ir/

:ﯽﯿوﺮ !ﻟا #ﺎﺷ ۹۹۳۱ - ۲۳۸۲

2021 - 2040

#

$

% &'

1 2 |

3 |

4 | ! "|

5

1 .

. ! "

:$

[email protected]

2 .

. & ' ( ) * +' ,- . /

:$

[email protected]

3 .

) * +' ,- . ) * +'

. & ' ( :$

[email protected]r

4 . 2& '

. 3 ( &4 5 67 . 67 6 8

:$

[email protected]

5 . . ) * +' ): ;< * = > ): ;< ) &?

:$

[email protected]

$ % & '(

) *+

: $ % - . 8 @" AB C

"

/ 0 17: / 03 / 1400

"

/ 1.2 3 05 : / 04 / 1400

"

/ 4 5 06 : / 07 / 1400

"

/ 6 . 11 : / 04 / 1402

7 )8 9 : :

GCM

RCP2.6

RCP8.5

. ''H I J8 @" K

) M 2'NO 2040

- 2021

( (

$ .) R K

) ,- M $ S &

T $ (GCM

6 8

GFDL-ESM2M HadGEM2-ES

IPSL-

CM5A-LR

6 6

$ UN 6 8* &

6

RCP2.6 RCP8.5

6 . ( V'N

W 'C X M 6 ' Y' Z , * $ *

$ * M 6 8 CCT

$ "

) 2019 - 1986 K' ' $ ] S & ^_` . ( ;& (

*

& $ ] M 6 8

a

8 $,8

$ Xb

RCP8.5 IPSL-CM5A-LR

K' ' .) X?

*

& & * VZ? M 6 8

a c'8 _ 8 d 2'NO ''H + ( * e O

VZ?

.)( J X? J8 d M C 8 J'

K' ' J X? K

* M NZ?

VZ?

& *

RCP2.6 GFDL-ESM2M

C $ 23 N'

&

J' J8 d K

K' '

* M NZ?

X' " VZ?

6

RCP8.5 IPSL-CM5A-LR

5 / 10 N'

&

. ( $_

$ ',d ( J8 d 6 * M K' ' = f ''H *

) M 446 N' I &

) M $ ' ' ( J X? (G3S4

233 N' I &

(G2S1

O 8

" g (V' B . >) ( 6 < 6 8 . (

b: ;

h 6

; hK' <

h N- 6

$b >

K' < "

&?

i ) 1402 .(

4 '' K

^`

M Yj d

2021 - 2040 I H '' NO ' 2 6 ' ) $ . 13

) 2 ( 311 - 322 . DOI:https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2021.325229.881

: < . f & $ k .

. ©

(3)

1 . ) *+

l U ) b 2'NO f ''H Y' 5 = $4 b 6 8* ' )'4,b J X? $ $b d

$ ' & 6 8 ) T*]

)

Freund et al., 2017

( . . *

6 8 d

2d ) b

$ V'B

&

*

* d $ 6

H '' f 8

* = j> ' (

)

Nassiri et al., 2006

( $ $b . K

$d 6 * 6 8 & "

''H 2'NO ''H I md < VO < M $N,b * d

)

Stocker, 2014

(

^?

K'B 6 ! " $

$ -

&4 5 * V_O $ )_ J X? md < $d ( nU o 8 (

2

& $b (

T ,

* J X? K $d ( K 4 5

/ 1 ? $b )

Hallegatte et al., 2016

( .

M ,- b ) (GCM

e 1

6 - )

$d ,

6 8 ?

. X'?

; , 'O W

; d

Yj K' * (

$d

$&? '"

K X

<

p <

6

$'_(

6*

q "

6 8 b

$ J X?

X' 6 8*

$ UN 6 f ''H J 6 '( >

( . 6 8

$ GCM

R J'"

' 8

= 2'NO J'"

' ''H 2'NO

;&

O ' )

The First Climate Model., 2007

( * 6 ' f 4B j d . 6 8

$ GCM

R

J'"

K .) ( ;& 2'NO ''H ' b 2'NO $ = ) b p < < X K & 8

$d (

$ UN 6 8* & 6 8 ) 2'NO ''H 6

J'"

' d )

Doulabian et al., 2021; Duan et al.,

2021; Fujino et al., 2006; Georgescu et al., 2021; Hassan & Nile, 2021; Hosseini et al., 2021

.(

f ''H 8 d * 6 ' 8

$d ) d $ a 6 * 6 8 'H& $

8 8 ''H .

r J X? B . > ? ` K' M ''H K S &

) )

Moghim,

(2018

. * . * / * b / * 8 8

28 K' s 6 B . > V' f j> V'N

2& ' / b ) t u;<

) * 6 8

@ )',8 * j' ) > 6

)

Lehner et al., 2006

(.

$ B . >

s 2' C $&

6* d B . > e 7 B '8 B . > ( 8 B . > h (

- ,&b B . >

- 6 Z&O )

Wilhite & Glantz, 1985

( . 2 * . M _,d $d ) K' v / K

) B . > * $N< K'B $d ( 8 B . > wb J8 @" . (

J'" 6 * 6 8 M '

) ) ( T a 6* * ;&

Abbasian et al., 2021; Davarpanah et al., 2021; Pequeno

et al., 2021; Xu et al, 2021

.(

T a d $ " f 4B j p < J8 @"

W 'C X * !" . ( Y' Z ,

M 6 '

$ *

* 6 $ + ( T $ GCM

6 8

GFDL-ESM2M HadGEM2-ES

IPSL-CM5A-LR

6 6

8* &

6

$ UN 6

RCP2.6 RCP8.5

d M f ''H

$ f 5 $ ] NZ?

) 6

2020 - 2040 $x ( (

.

2 . ,

JB s 2'NO ''H f 4B j f -t` $'B M* "

6 8 J8 @"

a $d d

2CCT

K * >

JB s ) d V< 8 h

1 - ) & 8 g p K ' 2'NO ''H f 4B j wNy $d z X 6

$ R

$ * ' { > $Cj e 6 i U&

) * 67 o 5 2

- $s |. / $_

* &, O i U& V ( 2'NO ''H $ ' * J8 @" e T a V<

, W 'C X " * 8

3

6 ' Y' Z

T a .'? 6 d + * ;& $d ' 4

( 3 - 8 6 8 ' B 7 . (

(4)

H& * ;& wNy '

8 6 g &

$ 8 6 3N&U ^` 3N&U 8

4 3 ( .

$ - m

B . >

( R * ) K., +

( 8 8

' 7 B .

* d

6 Z&O 6 - - ,&b 4

3 . ( $_

6 6 B 8 * 6 8

* . X' $&(} 6 < + ( f -t` ^'_j $&(}

)'N O 6 8 ( CCT

)

Ashraf Vaghefi et al., 2017

( .

2'NO ''H $ ~ N J8 @" K T K'B 6*

.) $ * M 8 6

b ^ j $&(} 6 2'NO ''H )

1 ( 6 6

RCP2.6 RCP8.5

$ * GCM

7 "

ISI-MIP

)5

Hempel et al., 2013

(

* )

www.2w2e.com

.) ( N

6

RCP2.6

$ $d 6

M >

' 2' + ) o 4 $

IMAGE

* k * $ j' 6 8

K' * d )'4,b K .) ( < ` N8 d 2100

<

);8 • ? ; 'N' d

6 2d )> 67 o Z * ' K N' ? 6 8

$ _ 2d

$ UN 6 8* & r K K' 6

2a " M X 6 8

6IPCC

6 .)

RCP2.6

K d )RNy C 6

' d 2100

6 t'

€ <

490 )( $ a $ $d ) ( $_ ppm

6 / 2 6 & / & f

( K' . 6 +C? 8

RCP2.6

) + $d )

2050 )( ( J'

6

€ <) 5 / 0 . 6 & $ )_ (/ & f 6

RCP8.5

$ $d 6

) o 4 $ '

2' +

MESSAGE

k $

IIASA

.) ( < ` J d * $ 8 l U T - f 5 K

) ' r 2'NO ''H 6 8 '" $N C I J8 d 6 8 K' * d )'4,b K . 8

2100

<

12 • ? ; 'N'

$ T * ' 8 $ )_ ( K' v

$ UN 6 8* & r 67 6

J'

6 .) 8 *

RCP8.5

K d )RNy C 6

' d 2100

€ < 6 t'

1960 )( $ a $ $d ) ( $_ ppm

5 / 8 6 & / & f (

.

Table 1. Statistical period, GCMs and scenarios used in this research

ISI-MIP Institute Scenarios Period Parameter

GFDL-ESM2M NOAA/Geophysical Fluid

Dynamics Laboratory RCP2.6, RCP8.5, and Historical 2021-2050 for RCPs and 1986-2005

for Historical Precipitation HadGEM2-ES Met Office Hadley Center RCP2.6, RCP8.5, and Historical 2021-2050 for RCPs and 1986-2005

for Historical Precipitation IPSL-CM5A-LR L’Institute Pierre-Simon Laplace RCP2.6, RCP8.5, and Historical 2021-2050 for RCPs and 1986-2005

for Historical Precipitation

Observed (Base period) - 1986-2019 Precipitation

e X !| .)? f 5 ( d) 4B j f Z&U 6 i U& T T & K

& $ )_ GCM

7 * ;& '" 4O 6 8

Global Climate Data Management (GCDM)

T X?

K' ' C CCT

6 8 Y' Z & . ( $_ 8 & " B f N $ ] $ 8

W 'C X * ;& 6 ' p )? f 5 6 ,

. ( ,- M 6 Y' Z w K

M * J8 @"

Multiplicative

$B 4 ) 1 Y' Z 6 ( ) ( ;& $ * M 6 8

.

P = P × P

P (1 $j

$B 4 $d )

1 ( M C P P

.) M f N K' ' C 28

K' s

i j

$ k

w' * ,(

. & 8

(5)

2 - 1 .

- *

• - K' d J8 @" K

'? Hb 6 8 23

B 5 / 41

` $b '? Hb 6 8

5 / 41 B

5 / 67 .) ( T a $b d

>

'

$ )<

1648000 d

' / & N

' . b *

S'N> $ $d ,- 6 W ? ) X> $s $ ,( * & 8 * 6 8

.

*

" • B

?

' H&

'

$&( V ( ) d /; d

* ) z X K

d 6

NO ' 2 8 6

;&

.)

d $&(

* _B * y ,b * 6 l a * y ( 6 & H? & ,d ‚ ( $

.

JU 4; *

& * _B * 6

V<

b

$s d X>

' ( ) * _- * $& > ) `

$s

$ X>

6

Nb b

' 6 d }B $ _b B ,(

* _B

` $ _b b .) e >

W * d $&(

$ d * 8 6

$s b O (

d '

$ ( * y

&

8 6

$ X 8 ( d

. 2'NO

8 2' C Nd $& s $ 6 : (

1 -

$s V< h ` &4 8 X> 6

( 2 -

JU he > T d )< * 6 * 2 $d 6Xd 6 8

3 - wNy h & 8 d

$ 6 8

$&(

d

$ ) * _B W * 6 8 &4 2'NO X> $s ,8 * _B d $&( B ,( 6 8

8 (. ` 4

- . & 8 2'NO g K 6 b V< h ` T

3 . / 0 1

& 6 b ,- M $ J8 @" K

$ UN 6 8*

)B ) b $d ) ( 6

b 6 Z&> 2xt- J8 @" K ( 2'NO ''H )B < J( * e 8 S & $x )

2 ( (

.)

Table 2. Different scenarios and their acronyms in this research Acronym Scenario

GCM

G1S1 RCP 2.6

GFDL-ESM2M

G2S1 RCP 2.6

HadGEM2-ES

G3S1 RCP 2.6

IPSL-CM5A-LR

G1S4 RCP 8.5

GFDL-ESM2M

G2S4 RCP 8.5

HadGEM2-ES

G3S4 RCP 8.5

IPSL-CM5A-LR

BP Observed

Base period

) dl $ T*]

$ R K' ' $_ 6 S & $x

*

&

* 8

& $._( K ' 6 8 8

NZ? $ ] 6 M f ''H .) ( ;&

$ $x w' .) (

28 K' s b ) 3 ( $5t>

J , d 6 2'NO ''H I ) M f ''H S &

. 8

b $ $b )

3 ( V.(

) 6 8 1 ) ( 3 ( ot&> $d + ( $ " 8 $ ] M K' '

) 2'NO ''H , i & & S & K

.

J' K' ' J X? K

*

& $ ] M 6 8

a + ( $ ~ G2S1

6 / 44

N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S1

6 / 42 N'

&

) . J' K' ' J8 d K

* $ ] M

&

6 8 a

+ ( $ ~ G3S4

8 / 16 N'

&

K' ' .)

*

& $ ] M 6 8

a + ( $,8

$ Xb .) X? G3S4

J'

& e $ ] M J X? K

a

(6)

+ ( $ ~ G2S1

7 / 233 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G1S1

4 / 163 N'

&

.) J' K

& e $ ] M J8 d

a + ( $ ~ G3S4

446 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S1

1 / 328 N'

&

.)

Figure 1. Long-term average of the annual precipitation variation due to climate change in Iran (GFDL-ESM2M)

(7)

Figure 2. Long-term average of the annual precipitation variation due to climate change in Iran (HadGEM2-ES)

(8)

Figure 3. Long-term average of the annual precipitation variation due to climate change in Iran (IPSL-CM5A-LR)

(9)

3 - 1 . 234 5 6

J' K' ' J X? K

*

& X' " VZ? M 6 8

a + ( $ ~ G2S1

8 / 21

N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

9 / 9 N'

&

.) J' K' ' J8 d K

* X' " VZ? M

&

6 8 a

+ ( $ ~ G3S4

5 / 10 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S1

2 / 10

N'

&

.) J'

& e X' " VZ? M J X? K

a + ( $ ~ G2S1

1 / 275

N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

7 / 141 N'

&

.) J'

& e X' " VZ? M J8 d K

a + ( $ ~ G3S4

3 / 139 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S1

5 / 103 N'

&

.)

Table 3. The seasonal and annual precipitation variation due to climate change

Seasonal precipitation (Future - Base period) (mm) Annual precipitation (Future - Base period) (mm) Winter Spring Summer Fall

G1S1

Average 23.0 4.8 -1.7 1.0 25.5

Maximum 81.2 24.9 18.5 67.4 163.4

Minimum -27.3 -13.5 -59.8 -26.4 -28.7

G1S4

Average 18.8 5.3 -2.2 7.3 30.5

Maximum 100.7 26.9 8.6 58.4 144.3

Minimum -18.9 -8.7 -97.9 -32.1 -70.3

G2S1

Average 20.5 -2.5 -0.6 21.8 44.6

Maximum 88.6 30.6 19.7 275.1 233.7

Minimum -37.4 -16.1 -113.7 -10.2 -13.0

G2S4

Average 11.9 -0.9 -0.2 9.9 23.4

Maximum 52.7 11.6 27.9 141.7 139.2

Minimum -31.6 -21.5 -94.4 -25.2 -79.8

G3S1

Average 8.9 20.7 -1.1 -10.2 42.6

Maximum 57.5 80.9 24.5 16.5 150.7

Minimum -34.6 -26.9 -221.1 -103.5 -328.1

G3S4

Average 8.9 7.0 -2.0 -10.5 -16.8

Maximum 77.0 54.1 51.0 16.8 125.5

Minimum -25.3 -16.1 -240.5 -139.3 -446.0

3 - 2 . 234 17

K' '

*

& & VZ? M 6 8

a .) ' X? 2'NO ''H + ( * e c'8

J' K' ' J8 d K

*

& & VZ? M 6 8

a + ( $ ~ G1S4

2 / 2

N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S4

2 N'

&

.) J'

& e & VZ? M J X? K

a + ( $ ~ G3S4

51 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

9 / 27 N'

&

.)

J'

& e & VZ? M J8 d K

a + ( $ ~ G3S4

5 / 240 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S1

1 / 221 N'

&

.)

3 - 3 . 234 8

J' K' ' J X? K

*

& VZ? M 6 8

a + ( $ ~ G3S1

7 / 20

N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S4

7 N'

&

.) J' K' ' J8 d K

* VZ? M

&

6 8 a

+ ( $ ~ G2S1

5 / 2 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

9 / 0 N'

&

.) J'

& e VZ? M J X? K

a + ( $ ~ G3S1

9 / 80 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G3S4

1 / 54 N'

&

.) J' e VZ? M J8 d K

&

a

+ ( $ ~ G3S1

9 / 26 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

5 / 21 N'

&

.)

(10)

3 - 4 . 234 17 9

J' K' ' J X? K

*

& & * VZ? M 6 8

a + ( $ ~ G1S1

23

N'

&

6 4 $_

+ ( G1S4

8 / 18 N'

&

K' ' .)

*

& & * VZ? M 6 8

a c'8 .) ' 8 d 2'NO ''H + ( * e J'

& e & * VZ? M J X? K

a + ( $ ~ G1S4

7 / 100 N'

&

+ ( 6 4 $_

G2S4

6 / 88 N'

&

.)

J'

& e & * VZ? M J8 d K

a + ( $ ~ G2S1

4 / 37 N'

&

$_

+ ( 6 4 G3S1

6 / 34 N'

&

.)

J8 @"

~ C & J( 8 @" m 6 ) ( T a 8 6 3N&U

1980 B 2000 ) ) ( • B

Doulabian et al., 2021

J8 @" .(

$ " 2'NO ''H 6 8 & 6 8

) ;5 &

Sadeqi & Kahya, 2021

) & * > & (

Nikbakht Shahbazi, 2019

$p < ( 6

) X 8 ' $ > X $p <

Yousefi et al., 2020

f ''H 8 @" .) ( (

e * ;& 2'NO ''H 'Iv ) M . * T s M X 6 8 GCM

IPCC

) ) ( T a

Mousavi et al., 2016

& * € _ C 4 d " K&? R p < J8 @" .(

8

) 92 28 ( &

) ] ` 6 K' s 1986

B 2019 (

$,8 / b 8 $_ b

K > ^ j ( b * d $ 6 ) M f ''H Nd K&( }B )( 6 d td f ,',Z , M X (2a " M X )IPCC

) ' 6 }

d / $ ~ 6 8 . (

4 . ): 1

; <

$ S & J8 @" K . ( d M 2'NO f ''H I p < J8 @"

T $ GCM

6 8

GFDL-ESM2M HadGEM2-ES

IPSL-CM5A-LR

& 6 6

RCP2.6 RCP8.5

$ ( V'N W 'C X R

S & 6 ' Y' Z , 8

6 * GCM

J8 @" K . ( ;& CCT

$ S & T a $ * * T f _ 28 .) ( $x $ ] NZ? f 5

K' ' * S & $x 6 K' s

* + Z )< $d

$ K ' 6 8 ' ' $ ] S & ^_` . ( ;& ) )

* K

& $ ] M 6 8

$ + ( $,8 a Xb

* K' ' .) X? G3S4

& * VZ? M

&

6 8 c'8 a

VZ? O _ 8 d 2'NO ''H + ( * e J X? J8 d M C 8

J' .)(

K' ' J X? K

* + ( & * VZ? NZ? M C $ G1S1

23 N' &

J'

* K' ' J8 d K + ( ) X' " VZ? NZ? M

G3S4

5 / 10 N' . ( $_ &

) M $ ',d ( J8 d g ,a 446

N' I &

$ ' ' ( J X? (G3S4

) M 233 N' I &

(G2S1

M K' ' = f ''H ? ` *

" g O 8 (V' B . >) ( 6 < 6 8

K }B . (

$ * '

$ ^'O 6X / / b ) R

. (

) M $ ' ' $ ',d * f ''H $ $b ) b $d 2'NO ''H I

3

$5t> ( 8 V O * 6

i & & $a'& K )

" f ( ? $d ( J X? 6 < 6 8

d R K * }B .

)> * 6 b < ` * ' 28 8

6 < / O ) 2a ^'O $ K K' s ( B . > V' )

K ? d b y t' I < . * ( 1398

J8 @" K . 6 ' Nb

(11)

$

& M * K' ' * s $ b wB O S & $x R * ;& ) 8

;& (K ' 6 8

e 6 f _ B (

& e ( T a 8

2',Z ] '&> * ' f 5 ) O '

. ' 2',Z 6 )

^'O 6 ' Vd )'4p K&( R ) * ' d * &, O 6

28 d

& K' s

T O R 4B j a 6 8

$x S & ^_` . (

) b (

3 (

M X's J X? 8 $&( $ " $ )_ s ''H M f N K' ' f] < K &

.) ,8 X' 2'NO $ $b

28 ) e > ^` wNy $d X? * ( )'4,b J X? K' s

)4 5

$ 67 $ )'4,b 6 8* ' ( _ f N / / b ) $ * ' d

+ l ] (

.

5 . 5

>?

, 1. General Circulation Model

2.Climate Change Tool 3. Downscaling 4.Biascorrection

5. Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project 6. IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change

6 .

*' A

* }B .) ) * +' * ? d $ 2'NO ''H f I * 7 " * &, O J8 @" K J8 @" K T a ) b * K f - O .

.

7 . C4 D

c'8

. b + 4? • 4 $

8 . C

Abbasian, M. S., Najafi, M. R., & Abrishamchi, A. (2021). Increasing risk of meteorological drought in the Lake Urmia basin under climate change: introducing the precipitation–temperature deciles index. Journal of Hydrology, 592, 125586.

Ashraf Vaghefi, S., Abbaspour, N., Kamali, B., & Abbaspour, K. C. (2017). A toolkit for climate change analysis and pattern recognition for extreme weather conditions – Case study: California- Baja California Peninsula. Environmental Modelling and Software, 96, 181-198.

Davarpanah, S., Erfanian, M., & Javan, K. (2021). Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Drought and Wet Spells in Lake Urmia Basin. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 178(2), 545-563.

Doulabian, S., Golian, S., Toosi, A. S., & Murphy, C. (2021). Evaluating the effects of climate change on precipitation and temperature for Iran using RCP scenarios. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(1), 166-184.

Duan, R., Huang, G., Li, Y., Zhou, X., Ren, J., & Tian, C. (2021). Stepwise clustering future meteorological drought projection and multi-level factorial analysis under climate change: A case study of the Pearl River Basin, China. Environmental Research, 196, 110368.

Freund, E.R., Abbaspour, K.C., & Lehmann, A. (2017). Water resources of the Black Sea Catchment under future climate and landuse change projections. Water (Switzerland),9(8),1-18.

(12)

Fujino, J., Nair, R., Kainuma, M., Masui, T., & Matsuoka, Y. (2006). Multi-gas mitigation analysis on stabilization scenarios using aim global model. Energy Journal, 27(SPEC. ISS.

NOV.), 343-353.

Georgescu, M., Broadbent, A. M., Wang, M., Krayenhoff, E. S., & Moustaoui, M. (2021).

Precipitation response to climate change and urban development over the continental United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 44001.

Hallegatte, S., Rogelj, J., Allen, M., Clarke, L., Edenhofer, O., Field, C.B., Friedlingstein, P., Van Kesteren, L., Knutti, R., Mach, K.J., & Mastrandrea, M. (2016). Mapping the climate change challenge. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 663.

Hassan, W. H., & Nile, B. K. (2021). Climate change and predicting future temperature in Iraq using CanESM2 and HadCM3 modeling. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7(2), 737-748.

Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013). A trend-preserving bias correction–the ISI-MIP approach. Earth System Dynamics, 4(2), 219-236.

Hosseini, M., Bigtashi, A., & Lee, B. (2021). Generating future weather files under climate change scenarios to support building energy simulation–A machine learning approach.

Energy and Buildings, 230, 110543.

Lehner, B., Döll, P., Alcamo, J., Henrichs, T., & Kaspar, F. (2006). Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis.

Climatic Change, 75(3), 273-299.

Moghim, S. (2018). Impact of climate variation on hydrometeorology in Iran. Global and Planetary Change, 170(August), 93-105.

Mousavi, S. S., Karandish, F., & Tabari, H. (2016). Temporal and spatial variation of rainfall in Iran under climate change until 2100. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 7(1), 152-165.

Nassiri, M., Koocheki, A., Kamali, G. A., & Shahandeh, H. (2006). Potential impact of climate change on rainfed wheat production in Iran: (Potentieller Einfluss des Klimawandels auf die Weizenproduktion unter Rainfed-Bedingungen im Iran). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 52(1), 113-124.

Nikbakht Shahbazi, A. (2019). Investigation of Crop Evapotranspiration and Precipitation changes under Climate Change RCPs Scenarios in Khouzestan province. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 25(6), 123-139.

Pequeno, D.N., Hernandez-Ochoa, I.M., Reynolds, M., Sonder, K., MoleroMilan, A., Robertson, R.D., Lopes, M.S., Xiong, W., Kropff, M., & Asseng, S. (2021). Climate impact and adaptation to heat and drought stress of regional and global wheat production. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), 54070.

Sadeqi, A., & Kahya, E. (2021). Spatiotemporal analysis of air temperature indices, aridity conditions, and precipitation in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 145(1), 703-716.

Stocker, T. (2014). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.

Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H. (1985). Water International Understanding: the Drought Phenomenon: The Role of Definitions Understanding: the Drought Phenomenon : The Role of Definitions. Water International, 10(3), 111-120.

Xu, K., Wu, C., Zhang, C., & Hu, B.X. (2021). Uncertainty assessment of drought characteristics projections in humid subtropical basins in China based on multiple CMIP5 models and different index definitions. Journal of Hydrology, 600, 126502.

Yousefi, H., Moridi, A., Yazdi, J., & KhazaiePoul, A. (2020). Investigating the effect of climate change on discharge, NO3 load, and agricultural products yield upstream of Esteghlal dam. Iran-Water Resources Research, 16(2), 35-49.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait