Investigation into the effects of slip boundary condition on nanofluid flow in a double-layer microchannel
Abedin Arabpour1•Arash Karimipour2•Davood Toghraie1 •Omid Ali Akbari3
Received: 23 August 2017 / Accepted: 29 October 2017 / Published online: 7 November 2017 Akade´miai Kiado´, Budapest, Hungary 2017
Abstract
In this research, the laminar flow and heat transfer of kerosene/MWCNT nanofluid in a novel design of a double-layer microchannel under the influence of oscillating heat flux and slip boundary condition have been studied. This research has been investigated in the dimensionless lengths of (k
1) 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 and dimen- sionless slip velocity coefficients ranging from 0.001 to 0.1. The suspension of nanoparticles in kerosene as the base fluid has been studied in Reynolds numbers of 1–100 and volume fractions of 0–8%. The results indicate that, by using novel design of double-layer microchannel in
k1=1/3, the maximum rate of performance evaluation criterion is obtained and by increasing the slip velocity coefficient, the amount of PEC becomes significant.
Among the studied cases, in all Reynolds numbers and volume fractions, the dimensionless length of 1/3 has the maximum amount of friction coefficient. Also, by enhancing the volume fraction of nanoparticles, slip velocity coefficient, Reynolds number and significant reduction in thermal resistance of solid wall, Nusselt number enhances.
Keywords
Double-layer microchannel Slip velocity coefficient Nusselt number Friction coefficient Thermal resistance Pressure drop
List of symbols
A
Area (m
2)
B=b/H
Dimensionless slip velocity
CfSkin friction factor
Cp
Heat capacity (J kg
-1K
-1)
H
Microchannel height,
lmK
Thermal conductivity coefficient (Wm
-1K
-1)
L
Down-layer microchannel length (lm)
L1Top-layer microchannel length (lm)
Nu
Nusselt number
P
Fluid pressure (Pa)
Pe=
(u
sds/a
f) Peclet number
Pr=#f/a
fPrandtl number
q00
(X) Oscillating heat flux (Wm
-2)
q000Constant heat flux (Wm
-2)
RThermal resistance (KW
-1)
Re=qfucd/lfReynolds number
T
Temperature (K)
(U,
V)=(u/U
0,
v/U0)
Dimensionless velocity components in
x, ydirections
(X,
Y)=(x/d,
y/d)Cartesian dimensionless coordinates
u,v
Velocity components in
x,ydirections (ms
-1)
uc
Inlet velocity in
xdirections (ms
-1)
usBrownian motion velocity (ms
-1)
WThe width of microchannels (lm)
& Davood Toghraie
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr 84175-119, Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran
Greek symbols
b
Slip velocity coefficient (m)
uNanoparticles volume fraction
k=L1/L Dimensionless length ration
l
Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)
h=
(T–T
C)/DT Dimensionless temperature
q
Density (kg m
-3)
s
Shear stress (Nm
-2)
#
Kinematics viscosity (m
2s
-1)
Super- and subscripts
Ave Average
c Cold
Eff Effective
f Base fluid (pure water)
H Hot
In Inlet Max Maximum Min Minimum nf Nanofluid Out Outlet
S Solid nanoparticles
Introduction
Using nanotechnology in the hydrodynamics and heat transfer sciences has created challenging progresses among the researchers interested in these topics. The transferring and rheological properties of custom fluids used in heat transfer of industrial systems can be improved by dis- tributing the oxide and non-oxide nanoparticles in the custom fluids (called nanofluid). The experimental results indicate that adding nanoparticles to the base fluid impressively enhances the heat transfer coefficient of nanofluid [1–5]. Investigating and estimating nanofluid behaviors in novel heat transfer surfaces as new experi- mental phases have been widely processed by the researchers [6–11]. Among the novel heat transfer meth- ods, removing high heat fluxes by microchannel is very common in the miniature industries. Microchannel is a small and efficient heat exchanger in which by combining some properties, such as high aspect coefficient, high heat transfer coefficient, less volume of demanded fluid and small dimensions, it has become effective equipment in heat transfer fields [12–18]. The microchannel heat sink has been initially introduced by Tukemen and Pease [19].
Line et al. [20] numerically and parametrically investigated the fluid flow and heat transfer in double-layer, three-layer and four-layer microchannels made of silicon with the pure water as the cooling fluid. Their results showed that, in the multi-walled microchannel, by increasing the number of layers, the bottom wall temperature becomes uniform and
thermal resistance decreases. Leng et al. [21] numerically investigated a novel design of microchannel heat sink.
They figured out that, at the bottom wall of the truncated double-layer microchannel, the temperature distribution is more uniform and thermal resistance is lower. Also, they revealed that, in this design, the improvement in heat transfer performance is based on the weak heating effects of top layers. Bello-Ochende et al. [22] simulated a numerical optimization of a three-dimensional water fluid flow and heat transfer in a rectangular microchannel made of silicon. In this study, the geometrical optimization has been performed for determining the optimized ratio of channel dimensions in order to reduce the total maximum temperature and enhance the total thermal conductivity.
Heris et al. [23] studied the forced convective heat transfer of laminar flow of water/Al
2O
3nanofluid inside a circular tube with constant wall temperature. Their results revealed that, when the nanofluid is used as the cooling fluid, the performance of silicon microchannel heat sink improves significantly. Chen and Ding [24] studied the heat transfer performance of microchannel with water/Al
2O
3nanofluid with different volume fractions. Their results showed that the amount of thermal resistance and temperature distri- bution under the influence of inertia energy changes sig- nificantly. Hung and Yan [25], by using nanofluid and variable geometrical parameters, investigated the improvement in thermal performance of double-layer microchannel. Their results indicated that, by using water/
Al
2O
3nanofluid, the amount of heat transfer improves and
by using nanoparticles, the thermal resistance reduces. The
three-dimensional laminar flow has been numerically
studied by Xie et al. [26] using the computational fluids
dynamics. Their numerical results showed that, comparing
to the smooth microchannel, using multistage bifurcations
at the microchannel outlet causes the enhancement of the
thermal performance. In order to investigate the flow
behavior in micron dimensions, some studies have been
carried out by researchers considering the slip boundary
conditions [27–29]. Raisi et al. [30] numerically studied the
laminar flow and heat transfer in a rectangular
microchannel and figured out that, in low Reynolds num-
bers, the existence of slip on the solid walls does not have
any significant effect on heat transfer enhancement; how-
ever, in high Reynolds numbers, it causes impressive
enhancement of heat transfer. By investigating the resear-
ches about heat transfer and flow hydrodynamics in the
microchannels, it can be said that, by changing the geo-
metrics of flow and boundary conditions and increasing the
thermal conductivity of fluid, the convective heat transfer
enhances [31]. In this research, the laminar flow and heat
transfer of nanofluid in the microchannel heat sink have
been numerically studied. The double-layer microchannel
heat sink has been studied in the two-dimensional
Cartesian coordinate and has been considered truncated.
(Due to the placing of the top wall on the bottom wall of channel, a part of the top wall has been eliminated.) Ker- osene/MWCNTs nanofluid has been used as the working fluid in the double-layer microchannel heat sink. Some investigated the issues distinguishing this study from other researches in this field are: (1) using novel design of double-layer microchannel; (2) using kerosene/MWCNTs nanofluid; (3) using slip boundary condition; (4) applying sinusoid heat flux; (5) simultaneous presentation and comparison of heat transfer and hydrodynamics results.
Problem statement
In the present study, the laminar flow and heat transfer of kerosene/MWCNTs nanofluid in the rectangular double- layer microchannel heat sink have been numerically stud- ied. The main purpose of this study is investigating the laminar flow and heat transfer of nanofluid in a new microchannel design. By using finite volume method, this research has been numerically simulated in a two-dimen- sional space. In this research, the fluid and heat transfer parameters have been investigated in Reynolds numbers of 1, 10 and 100 and volume fractions of 0, 4 and 8% of nanoparticles. Figure
1demonstrates the studied geomet- rics of this paper. According to Fig.
1, the microchannellength is
L=3 mm, the microchannel height is
H=50
lm, the microchannel thickness is t=12.5
lmand the length of interface area to the bottom surface of channel is
L2and variable. Considering the definition of
dimensionless length as the ratio of the top layer length to the bottom layer length (k
1=L1/L), this study has been conducted in the dimensionless lengths (k
1=L1/L) of 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3. Also, by considering the definition of dimen- sionless slip velocity coefficient as the ratio of slip velocity coefficient to the microchannel height (B
=b/H), thenumerical simulation of the present study has been per- formed in the dimensionless slip velocity coefficients (B
=b/H) of 0.001, 0.01 and 0.1.In all the studied cases of this research, at the top and bottom layers, the inlet fluid enters as the contour flow with the temperature of 301 K and after heat transferring with the hot wall, fluid exits the channel. The studied microchannel has been made up of silicon and the bottom wall of microchannel with the length of L is under the influence of oscillating heat flux. All the external top and lateral walls of microchannel have been considered insu- lated. The governing boundary conditions on the problem- solving are the oscillating heat flux applied to the bottom wall of microchannel and the slip boundary condition applied to the internal walls of channel. In this numerical research, the effects of nanofluid density, the changes of dimensionless length (k
1=L1/L) and the dimensionless slip velocity coefficient (B
=b/H) at the range of differentReynolds numbers have been investigated. The nanofluid properties of this simulation and the materials of microchannel wall are, respectively, indicated in Tables
1and
2.In this simulation, the laminar fluid flow and heat transfer are completely developed. The nanofluid proper- ties are considered constant and independent from
Insoulation surface
Solid L1
L2 D
Uin, Tin
A B
H C t Uin, Tin
y X
MWCNT//Kerosene Nanofluid
L
q″(X) = 2q0 ″ + q0 ″sin(
π4X) Fig. 1 Schematic of studied
geometrics in this study
temperature. The solid–liquid suspension with low-volume fractions is modeled as single phase.
Governing equations
The governing equations on two-dimensional simulation domain are Navier–Stokes equations in Cartesian coordi- nate, which are defined as the dimensionless equations [33,
34]Continuity equation:
oU oXþoV
oY ¼
0
ð1ÞMomentum equation:
UoU oXþVoU
oY ¼ oP oXþ lnf
qnfmf
1 Re
o2U oX2þo2U
oY2
ð2Þ
UoV oXþVoV
oY ¼ oP oYþ lnf
qnfmf
1 Re
o2V oX2þo2V
oY2
ð3Þ
Energy equation:
Uoh oXþVoh
oY ¼anf
af
1 Re Pr
o2h oX2þo2h
oY2
ð4Þ
For non-dimensioning Eqs. (1)–(4), the following parameters are used [35]:
X¼ x
H; Y¼ y
H; V¼ v uc
; U¼ u
uc
; B¼b
H;
P¼ P
qnfu2c;
Pr
¼tfaf
; h¼TTc
DT ; DT¼q000H kf
ð5Þ
According to Eq. (6), the bottom wall of microchannel with the length of
Lis under the influence of oscillating heat flux and the amount of
q000can be calculated by the parameters of Eq. (5),
q00ðXÞ ¼
2q
000q000þq000sin
pX4
ð6Þ
One of the parameters for investigating microchannel performance is the friction coefficient, which is calculated by the following equation [36]:
Table 1 Thermophysical properties of base fluid and nanoparticles of MWCNTs [32]
u/% q/kg m-3 Cp/J kg-1K-1 k/W mK-1 l/Pa.s
0 783 2090 0.145 0.001457
4 815 1989 0.265 0.001613
8 845 1895 0.390 0.001795
Table 2 Thermophysical properties of microchannel body [21]
k/W mK-1 Cp/J kg-1K- q/kg m-3 Pr Material
124 702 2329 – Silicon
Table 3 Study of results independency from the grid number (x9y) Parameters along the line
AB
(300990) (4009100) (6009140)
Nuave 3.13 3.29 3.37
Error 7.12% 2.373% Base mesh
Cfave 0.852 0.831 0.8036
Error 6% 3.4% Base mesh
Tmax(K) 314.3 311.02 310.507
Error 1.22% 0.16% Base mesh
X
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Nux
0 2 4 6 8
Our study Nikkhah et al. [35]
Re = 100
ϕ = 0.12
(a)
X
0 2 4 6 8 10
Us
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Our study Nikkhah et al. [35]
Re = 100
ϕ = 0.12
(b)
Fig. 2 Validation with the numerical study of Nikkhah et al. [35]
Cf ¼
2
swqu2in ð7Þ
The average Nusselt number is a dimensionless number and in heat transfer indicates the convective heat transfer to the conductive heat transfer and can be obtained as [37]:
Nux¼hH
kf ! Nuave¼
1
LZ L 0
NuxðXÞ
dX
ð8ÞThe pressure drop in the inlet and outlet sections can be obtained as:
DP¼PinPout ð9Þ
The performance evaluation criterion is defined as [38]:
PEC
¼Nuave Nuave;u¼0
Cf Cf;u¼0
ð1=3Þ ð10Þ
The amount of thermal resistance of bottom wall of microchannel is calculated by the following equation [21]:
R¼TmaxTmin
q000 A ¼TmaxTin
q000 A ! A¼WR!R W
¼TmaxTin
q000 L ð11Þ
In the above equation,
Tmax,
Tmin,
Aand
q000are, respectively, the maximum temperature of bottom wall, the minimum temperature (the inlet temperature of fluid), the bottom section of microchannel with the length of (L) and the heat flux applied to the bottom wall (AB).
Governing boundary conditions on problem- solving
The thermal and hydrodynamical boundary conditions used in this problem are as follows:
0.275091 0.825272 1.37545 1.92563 2.47582 3.026 3.57618 4.12636
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m) = 0.0
ϕ
= 0.04 ϕ
= 0.08 ϕ
Fig. 3 Changes of dimensionless temperature in Reynolds number of 1 and dimensionless slip coefficient of 0.1 in the dimensionless length of 1/3
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0.275091 0.825272 1.37545 1.92563 2.47582 3.026 3.57618 4.12636
= 0.0 ϕ
= 0.04 ϕ
= 0.08 ϕ
Fig. 4 Changes of dimensionless temperature in Reynolds number of 1 and dimensionless slip coefficient of 0.1 in the dimensionless length of 2/3
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
X (m)
0.275091 0.825272 1.37545 1.92563 2.47582 3.026 3.57618 4.12636
= 0.0 ϕ
= 0.04 ϕ
= 0.08 ϕ
Fig. 5 Changes of dimensionless temperature in Reynolds number of 1 and dimensionless slip coefficient of 0.1 in the dimensionless length of 3/3
U¼
1
; V ¼0 and
h¼0
for X¼0 and 0:25
Y1:25 and
X¼60; 1:75
Y2:75
ð12Þ
V¼
0 and
oh oX¼oUoX
for
X¼60 and 0:25
Y1:25 and
X¼L21:75
Y2:75
ð13Þ V¼
0
; U¼0 and
ohoY¼
2q
000þq000sin
pX4
for
Y ¼0 and 0
X60
ð14Þ
V¼
0
; Us¼B oUoY
and
knfoh oY ¼ks
oh oY
for
Y¼0:25 and 0
X60
ð15Þ V¼
0
; U¼0 and
ohoY ¼
0 for
Y¼
1:5 and 0
XL2and
Y ¼3 and
L2X60
ð16Þ V¼0
; Us¼ BoUoY
and
knfohoY ¼ ksoh oY
for
Y¼1:25 and 0
X60
ð17Þ
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Down Layer
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 1/3 Down Layer Re = 1
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Down Layer
Re = 1
Re = 1
Re = 10
Re = 100
Re = 100 Re = 10
λl= 2/3
λl= 3/3 B = 0.001
B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Fig. 6 Average friction factor in Reynolds number, volume fraction, slip coefficient and different dimensionless lengths at the bottom microchannel layer in the wall length of (AB)
V¼
0
; Us¼BoUoY
and
knfoh oY¼ ks
oh oY
for
Y¼
1:75 and
L2X60
ð18ÞV¼
0
; Us¼ BoUoY
and
knfoh oY ¼ ks
oh oY
for
Y¼
2:75 and
L2X60
ð19ÞMesh study and numerical procedure
Today, due to the great cost of experimental platforms, the computation fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and numerical method [39] have become an effective tool to predict the results in industrial and laboratory scales. In this
numerical research, in order to simulate the solving domain, by using finite volume method [40–46], the number of organized grid number has been changed from 27,000 to 84,000. For investigating the results indepen- dency from the chosen grid number, the average Nusselt number, friction coefficient and maximum wall tempera- ture along (AB) have been compared with the results obtained from grid number of 84,000. The mentioned parameters have been investigated in the case of
k1=3/3 and Reynolds number of 10 in volume fraction of 4% and
B=0.1. Comparing to the base mesh state, the changes of Nusselt number, average friction coefficient and maximum wall temperature in grid numbers of 27,000 and 40,000 are, respectively, 7.12%, 2/37, 6, 3.4, 1.22 and 0.16%. Each of the above parameters with fallacy is indicated in Table
3.ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Up Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10
100 B = 0.001
B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Re = 100 Re = 10
Re = 1 Re = 1
Re = 1
λl= 1/3 Up Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
Cf
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Up Layer B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Re = 100 Re = 10
Re = 100 Re = 10
λl= 2/3
λl= 3/3
Fig. 7 Average friction factor in Reynolds number, volume fraction, slip coefficient and different dimensionless lengths at the top layer of microchannel along the wall (CD)
According to the changes of mentioned parameters, the grid number of 84,000 has been chosen for this simulation.
In this investigation, in order to increase the accuracy of solving, SIMPLEC algorithm [47–52] has been used for discretizing the governing equations using second-order upwind method [53,
54]. The maximum residual of presentsimulation is 10
-6[55,
56].Results and discussion
ValidationFigure
2indicates the validation of present research with the numerical study of Nikkhah et al. [35]. The investiga- tion has been carried out for calculating (a) the local
Nusselt number and (b) the local slip velocity on the microchannel wall. Nikkhah et al. [35] numerically inves- tigated the laminar flow of water/MWCNTs in a rectan- gular microchannel by applying oscillating heat flux and slip velocity boundary condition on the walls. The obtained results have acceptable coincidence and negligible error.
Dimensionless temperature contours
Figures
3–5show the dimensionless temperature contours in Reynolds number of 1 and dimensionless slip coefficient of 0.1 in the dimensionless lengths of 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3. The reduction in dimensionless temperature in different areas of microchannel indicates the dominant effect of heat transfer enhancement. By comparing the dimensionless tempera- ture at the top and bottom layers of microchannel, it can be
X
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nuave
0 5 10 15 20
Re = 1
Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 2/3
Down Layer
X
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nuave
0 5 10 15 20
ϕ = 0.00 ϕ = 0.04 ϕ = 0.08
Re = 1
Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 1/3
Down Layer
X
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nuave
0 5 10 15 20
Re = 1
Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 3/3
Down Layer
= 0.00
= 0.04
= 0.08
= 0.00
= 0.04
= 0.08
ϕ ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ ϕ
Fig. 8 Local Nusselt number in Reynolds number, volume fraction and different dimensionless lengths and slip coefficient of 0.1 at the microchannel bottom layer along the wall (AB)
said that, at the bottom layer, due to the direct contact of fluid with the hot wall, different areas of microchannel have significant temperature changes and dimensionless temperature enhancement. After entering the fluid to the microchannel and crossing the developed length and the augmentation of fluid temperature, due to the contact with wall and reduction in fluid temperature and growing the hot thermal boundary layer, the amount of heat transfer of cold fluid with hot surface decreases gradually. At the bottom layer, in addition to the mentioned factors, the main reason of dimensionless temperature changes and its maximum rate is due to the direct contact of fluid with the hot surface and heat concentration in this layer. In the top layer, by decreasing the dimensionless length due to the enhance- ment of developed length and according to the contours of top layer, the temperature changes of flow from the inlet to the outlet sections of microchannel reduce to the minimum amount, and comparing to the top layer, more uniform thermal profile has been accomplished.
Evaluating the average friction coefficient in the top and bottom layers of microchannel
Figure
6indicates the average friction coefficient at the bottom layer of microchannel along (AB) in Reynolds numbers of 1, 10 and 100, volume fractions, slip coefficient and different dimensionless lengths. By increasing Rey- nolds number in all the studied volume fractions, the average friction coefficient reduces. By increasing Rey- nolds number, the thickness of hydrodynamical boundary layer and the changes of velocity parameter in areas in
which the fluid is in contact with wall are reduced, and consequently, the friction coefficient decreases.
In all the investigated cases, due to the existence of similar geometrical and hydrodynamical conditions of bottom layer, the friction coefficient has a uniform amount.
In Fig.
6, by increasing the dimensionless slip velocitycoefficient, on the solid wall, the velocity parameter is improved and velocity gradients are decreased. Also, in higher slip velocity coefficients, the effect of solid wall on the reduction in velocity and the effects of friction coeffi- cient on the wall are less. Therefore, the minimum amount of average friction coefficient is obtained in the highest slip velocity coefficient. With the existence of solid nanopar- ticles in the cooling fluid, the effect of viscosity on the solid wall is improved, and according to Fig.
6, the max-imum amount of friction coefficient is accomplished in the highest volume fraction of nanoparticles.
Figure
7indicates the average friction coefficient in Rey- nolds numbers, volume fractions, slip coefficients and different dimensionless lengths at the top layer of microchannel along (CD). According to the figure, it can be concluded that, at the top layer, due to the reduction in microchannel length and enhancement of developed length, the flow at the outlet section of microchannel becomes undeveloped. This behavior causes the creation of velocity gradients in the areas near the wall and the enhancement of shear stress along (CD). Therefore, in all the studied cases, by decreasing the length of microchannel top layer and dimensionless slip velocity, the amount of friction increases insignificantly.
Among the studied cases, in all Reynolds numbers and volume fractions, the dimensionless length of 1/3 has the
X
20 30 40 50 60
Nuave
0 5 10 15 20
= 0.00
= 0.04
= 0.08
Re = 10
Re = 1 l= 2/3
Up Layer
X
40 45 50 55 60
Nuave
0 5 10 15 20
ϕ = 0.00 ϕ = 0.04 ϕ = 0.08
Re = 10
Re = 1 l= 1/3
Up Layer
ϕ ϕ ϕ λ λ
Fig. 9 Local Nusselt number in the top layer of microchannel in slip coefficient of 0.1 along the wall of (CD)
maximum amount of friction coefficient, and in the top layer with the length of 3/3, due to the development of flow on the direction of fluid motion and reduction in velocity profile changes from the developed length to lateral, the average friction coefficient has the minimum amount.
Evaluating Nusselt number behavior in the top and bottom layers of microchannel
In Fig.
8, the local Nusselt number at the bottom layer ofmicrochannel along (AB) in Reynolds numbers of 1, 10 and 100 with volume fractions of 0–8% of nanoparticles and dimensionless length of 2/3, 3/3 and 1/3 for slip coefficient of 0.1 has been indicated. The applying of oscillating heat flux to the solid wall influences the profile of local Nusselt number figure all over the channel. The changes of Nusselt number figure profile are obvious in
Reynolds numbers of 10 and 100 because of more heat transfer and thermal removal in this range of Reynolds number. In Reynolds number of 1, due to the low fluid velocity, the removal of heat flux from the microchannel walls influences all fluid areas and the difference of surface temperature and fluid temperature has the minimum amount; therefore, the profile of local Nusselt number figure is not under the influence of applied surface heat flux.
Figure
9demonstrates the local Nusselt number along (CD) on the top layer of microchannel in Reynolds num- bers of 1 and 10 and slip velocity coefficient of 0.1. This study has been conducted for the top layer dimensionless length of 1/3 and 2/3. By observing the behaviors of Nusselt number figures, it can be said that the increase in volume fraction causes the enhancement of Nusselt num- ber, and the change of Nusselt number in the top layer of
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
ΔP/pa
λl= 2/3 Up Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
ΔP/pa
1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5
Re = 100
Re = 100
Re = 10
Re = 10
Re = 1
λl= 1/3
Up Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
ΔP/pa
1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5 1e + 6
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
λl= 3/3 Up Layer
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Re = 1
Re = 1 Re = 10
Re = 100 1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5
Fig. 10 Pressure drop of flow in the top layer of microchannel
microchannel in Reynolds number of 10, comparing to Reynolds number of 1, is more significant. Among the two studied cases, it can be concluded that, at the top layer of microchannel with the dimensionless length of 1/3, the changes of local Nusselt number are more tangible. The reason is due to the undeveloped flow in low dimensionless length.
Evaluating the average pressure drop in the top and bottom layers and the average Nusselt number at the bottom layer of microchannel
Figures
10and
11, respectively, indicate the pressure dropof flow at the top and bottom layers of microchannel in different cases of dimensionless length, volume fraction, Reynolds number and slip velocity coefficient. It can be
understood from the figures that the enhancement of vol- ume fraction, Reynolds number and the top layer length entail the enhancement of average pressure drop. Also, the reduction in slip velocity coefficient causes the enhance- ment of average pressure drop. The reason of this behavior is because of the reduction and depreciation of velocity parameter on solid wall surface, due to the no-slip boundary condition or low dimensionless slip velocity coefficient. In the dimensionless slip velocity coefficient of 0.1, due to the enhancement of velocity vector length on the solid wall surface and the existence of solid surface, less depreciation is created in the momentum of fluid crossing the surface. In all volume fractions and Reynolds numbers of this case, comparing to the similar cases, the amount of pressure drop has the minimum amount.
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
ΔP/pa
λl= 2/3
Down Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
ΔP/pa
1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5 1e + 6
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1 Re = 100
Re = 10
Re = 1
λl= 1/3
Down Layer
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
ΔP/pa
λl= 3/3
Down Layer
1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5 1e + 6
1e + 2 1e + 3 1e + 4 1e + 5 1e + 6
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Re = 100
Re = 10
Re = 1
Re = 100
Re = 10
Re = 1
Fig. 11 Pressure drop of flow in the bottom layer of microchannel
Figure
12investigates the average Nusselt number at the bottom layer of microchannel according to different dimensionless lengths of the top layer, volume fraction, dimensionless slip velocity coefficient and Reynolds number. In all cases, by increasing volume fraction of nanoparticles, Reynolds number and the dimensionless slip velocity coefficient, the heat transfer mechanisms are improved and the heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number are increased. Among the studied Reynolds num- bers, Reynolds numbers of 100 and 10 have the maximum and minimum values of average Nusselt number, respec- tively. By increasing the amount of dimensionless slip velocity coefficient, heat transfer increases significantly and the average Nusselt number figures have higher levels.
Thermal resistance
Figure
13describes the thermal resistance of wall at the bottom layer of microchannel along (AB) in different volume fractions, Reynolds numbers, slip coefficient and dimensionless lengths of the top layer. This factor is defined as an efficient parameter for evaluating the amount of thermal resistance in each state of double-layer microchannel. The reduction in thermal resistance of sur- face is as the enhancement of heat transfer from the hot wall. The increase in volume fraction of nanoparticles and Reynolds number and dimensionless slip velocity coeffi- cient cause the enhancement of heat transfer and reduction in thermal resistance of surface. In general, the amount of thermal resistance in Reynolds number of 100, comparing to Reynolds number of 10, due to the enhancement of fluid
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
Nuave
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Re = 1 Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 2/3
Down Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
Nuave
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Re = 1 Re = 10 Re = 100
λl= 1/3
Down Layer
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
Nuave
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Re = 1 Re = 10
Re = 100
λl= 3/3
Down Layer
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Fig. 12 Average Nusselt number at the bottom layer of microchannel
velocity and convective heat transfer coefficient, decreases significantly.
Performance evaluation criterion (PEC)
Figure
14depicts the performance evaluation criterion (PEC) at the bottom layer of microchannel in different dimensionless slip coefficients and dimensionless lengths.
PEC factor is investigated for evaluating the heat transfer enhancement and friction coefficient caused by adding solid nanoparticles to the cooling fluid. In performance evaluation criterion figures, due to the significant heat transfer enhancement, comparing to the friction coefficient, the augmentation of volume fraction of nanoparticles and Reynolds number has an increasing progress. Among the
studied dimensionless lengths, the dimensionless length of 3/3 has the minimum amount of efficiency. Also, the dimensionless length of 1/3 has the maximum amount of performance evaluation criterion.
The main reason of this behavior is due to the optimized proportion of friction coefficient, comparing to the effect of heat transfer enhancement. Therefore, using truncated microchannel in dimensionless lengths of 1/3 and 2/3 and higher Reynolds numbers has more efficiency than the dimensionless length of 3/3. According to the behavior of performance evaluation criterion figure, it can be under- stand that the effect of heat transfer enhancement is more dominant than the friction coefficient enhancement. By increasing the performance evaluation criterion, this issue
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
R*w/K/m W
0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15
Re = 10
Re = 100 λl= 2/3
Down Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
R*w/K/m W
0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15
Re = 10
Re = 100 λl = 1/3
Down Layer
0.00 0.04ϕ 0.08
R*w/K/m W
0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14
Re = 10
Re = 100 λl= 3/3
Down Layer B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
B = 0.001 B = 0.01 B = 0.1
Fig. 13 Thermal resistance of walls at the bottom layer of microchannel along the wall (AB)
is proportional to the augmentation of dimensionless slip velocity coefficient.
Conclusions
In this study, the laminar flow and heat transfer in the double-layer microchannel with truncated top layer have been investigated. The main purpose of this study is cooling the microchannel heat sink by using kerosene/
MWCNTs. The important results of this study indicate that among the studied Reynolds numbers, Reynolds numbers of 100 and 1 have the maximum and minimum amounts of average Nusselt number, respectively. The enhancement of volume fraction of nanoparticles, Reynolds number and dimensionless slip velocity coefficient cause considerable augmentation of heat transfer and reduction in thermal resistance of surface. By increasing the Reynolds number, fluid velocity enhances and this factor prevents heat transferring from the hot surface to the central core of flow.
The dimensionless length of 1/3 has the maximum amount of performance evaluation criterion. Therefore, the trun- cated microchannel design with higher Reynolds numbers and dimensionless lengths of 1/3 and 2/3, comparing to the dimensionless length of 3/3, has more efficiency. The extension of this paper in nanofluid studies, according to our previous works [57–108], affords a good option for engineers to investigate the micro- and nano-simulations.
References
1. Zarringhalam M, Karimipour A, Toghraie DD. Experimental study of the effect of solid volume fraction and Reynolds number on heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop of CuO–
Water nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2016;76:342–51.
2. Naphon P, Assadamongkol P, Borirak T. Experimental investi- gation of titanium nanofluids on the heat pipe thermal efficiency.
Int Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2008;35:1316–9.
3. AbbasianArani AA, Amani J. Experimental investigation of diameter effect on heat transfer performance and pressure drop of TiO2–Water nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci.
2013;44:520–33.
4. Charjouei Ebrahimnia-Bajestan E, Moghadam M, Niazmand H, Daungthongsuk W, Wongwises S. Experimental and numerical investigation of nanofluids heat transfer characteristics for application in solar heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf.
2016;92:1041–52.
5. Goshayeshi HR, Goodarzi M, Safaei MR, Dahari M. Experi- mental study on the effect of inclination angle on heat transfer enhancement of a ferro-nanofluid in a closed loop oscillating heat pipe under magnetic field. Exp Therm Fluid Sci.
2016;74:265–70.
6. Togun H, Ahmadi G, Abdulrazzaq T, Shkarah AJ, Kazi SN, Badarudin A, Safaei MR. Thermal performance of nanofluid in ducts with double forward-facing steps. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2015;47:28–42.
7. Yarmand H. Gharehkhani S. Kazi SN. Sadeghinezhad E. Safaei MR. Numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement in a rectangular heated pipe for turbulent nanofluid, Scient. World J.
2014; 369593.
8. Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA. A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.
2011;15:1646–68.
9. Goshayeshi HR, Safaei MR, Goodarzi M, Dahari M. Particle size and type effects on heat transfer enhancement of ferro- nanofluids in a pulsating heat pipe under magnetic field. Powder Technol. 2016;301:1218–26.
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
PEC
0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9
Re = 100
Re = 10
Re = 1 Down Layer
ϕ
0.00 0.04 0.08
PEC
0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9
λl = 1/3 λl = 2/3 λl = 3/3
Re = 1 Re = 10 Re = 100
Down Layer
l = 1/3
l = 2/3
l = 3/3 λ λ λ
B = 0.01 B = 0.001
Fig. 14 Performance evaluation criteria at the bottom layer of microchannel in different Reynolds numbers
10. Goodarzi M, Amiri A, Goodarzi MS, Safaei MR, Karimipour A, Languri EM, Dahari M. Investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of a counter flow corrugated plate heat exchanger using MWCNT based nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2015;66:172–9.
11. Khanafer K, Vafai K. A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf.
2012;54:4410–42.
12. Xie GN, Chen ZY, Sunden B, Zhang W. Comparative study of flow and thermal performance of liquid-cooling parallel-flow and counter-flow double-layer wavy microchannel heat sinks.
Num Heat Transf A Appl. 2013;64:30–55.
13. Xie GN, Chen ZY, Sunden B, Zhang W. Numerical predictions of flow and thermal performance of water-cooled single-layer and double-layer wavy microchannel heat sinks. Numer Heat Transf A Appl. 2013;63:201–25.
14. Xie G, Liu Y, Sunden B, Zhang W. Computational study and optimization of laminar heat transfer and pressure loss of dou- ble-layer microchannels for chip liquid cooling. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2013;5:1–9.
15. Hung TC, Yan WM, Wang XD. Optimal design of geometric parameters of double-layered microchannel heat sinks. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:3262–72.
16. Sharma D, Garg H, Singh PP, Karar V. Numerical study on the performance of double layer microchannel with liquid gallium and Water. Adv Mech Eng. 2013;5:324578.
17. Leng C, Wang XD, Wang TH, Yan WM. Optimization of thermal resistance and bottom wall temperature uniformity for double-layered microchannel heat sink. Energy Convers Manag.
2015;93:141–50.
18. Alipour H, Karimipour A, Safaei MR, Semiromi DT, Akbari OA. Influence of t-semi attached rib on turbulent flow and heat transfer parameters of a silver–water nanofluid with different volume fractions in a three-dimensional trapezoidal microchannel. Physica E. 2016;88:60–76.
19. Tukerman DB, Pease RFW. High performance heat sinking for VLSI. IEEE Electron Dev Lett. 1981;2:126–9.
20. Lin L, Deng MX, Zhang XX, Wang XD. Numerical analysis and parametric study of multilayered microchannel heat sinks. Adv Mech Eng. 2015;7:1–10.
21. Leng C, Wang XD, Wang TH. An improved design of double- layered microchannel heat sink with truncated top channels.
Appl Therm Eng. 2015;79:54–62.
22. Bello-Ochende T, Liebenberg L, Meyer JP. Constructal design:
geometric optimization of microchannel heat sinks. Afr J Sci.
2007;103:483–9.
23. Heris SZ, Esfahany MN, Etemad SG. Experimental investiga- tion of convective heat transfer of Al2O3/Water nanofluid in circular tube. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2007;28:203–10.
24. Chen CH, Ding CY. Study on the thermal behavior and cooling performance of a nanofluid-cooled microchannel heat sink. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;50:378–84.
25. Hung T, Yan W. Enhancement of thermal performance in double-layered microchannel heat sink with nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:3225–38.
26. Xie G, Zhang F, Sunde´n B, Zhang W. Constructal design and thermal analysis of microchannel heat sinks with multistage bifurcations in single-phase liquid flow. Appl Therm Eng.
2014;62:791–802.
27. Goodarzi M, Safaei MR, Karimipour A, Hooman K, Dahari M, Kazi SN, Sadeghinezhad E. Comparison of the finite volume and lattice boltzmann methods for solving natural convection heat transfer problems inside cavities and enclosures. Abstr Appl Anal. 2014;2014:1–15.
28. Karimipour A, Afrand M, Akbari M, Safaei MR. Simulation of fluid flow and heat transfer in the inclined enclosure. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2012;61:435–40.
29. Bird GA. Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows (Oxford Engineering Science Series) 2nd ed, 1994, Oxford Engineering Scientific Series.
30. Raisi A, Ghasemi B, Aminossadati SM. A numerical study on the forced convection of laminar nanofluid in a microchannel with both slip and No slip condition. Numer Heat Transf A Appl. 2011;59:114–29.
31. Mangrulkar CK, Kriplani VM. Nanofluid heat transfer—a review. Int J Eng Technol. 2013;54:1710–4.
32. Khan WA, Khan ZH, Rahi M. Fluid flow and heat transfer of carbon nanotubes along a flat plate with Navier slip boundary.
Appl Nanosci. 2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0242-9.
33. Karimipour A, Alipour H, Akbari OA, Semiromi DT, Esfe MH.
Studying the effect of indentation on flow parameters and slow heat transfer of water-silver nano-fluid with varying volume fraction in a rectangular two-dimensional micro channel. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;8:2015.
34. Akbari OA, Karimipour A, Toghraie D, Safaei MR, Goodarzi M, Alipour H, Dahari M. M. Investigation of Rib’s height effect on heat transfer and flow parameters of laminar water—Al2O3 nanofluid in a two dimensional rib-microchannel. Appl Math Comput. 2016;290:135–53.
35. Nikkhah Z, Karimipour A, Safaei MR, Forghani-Tehrani P, Goodarzi M, Dahari M, Wongwises S. Forced convective heat transfer of Water/functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube nanofluids in a microchannel with oscillating heat flux and slip boundary condition. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf.
2015;68:69–77.
36. Safaei MR, Gooarzi M, Akbari OA, Safdari SM, Dahari M.
performance evaluation of nanofluids in an inclined ribbed microchannel for electronic cooling applications. In: Sohel Murshed SM , editor. Electronic Cooling Prof. InTech; 2016.
https://doi.org/10.5772/62898. http://www.intechopen.com/books/
electronics-cooling/performance-evaluation-of-nanofluids-in- an-inclined-ribbed-microchannel-for-electronic-cooling-appli 37. Akbari OA, Toghraie D, Karimipour A, Marzban A, Ahmadi
GR. The effect of velocity and dimension of solid nanoparticles on heat transfer in non-Newtonian nanofluid. Physica E.
2017;86:68–75.
38. Xia GD, Liu R, Wang J, Du M. The characteristics of convective heat transfer in microchannel heat sinks using Al2O3and TiO2 nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016.https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.034.
39. Khodabandeh E, Davoodi H, Zargar O, Rozati SA. Evaluation of the performance and structure of an industrial bellows valve using finite element analysis. Asia Pac J 2016; 2.
40. Khodabandeh E, Ghaderi M, Afzalabadi A, Rouboa A, Salari- fard A. Parametric study of heat transfer in an electric arc fur- nace and cooling system. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;123:1190–200.
41. Pourfattah F, Motamedian M, Sheikhzadeh GH, Toghraie D, Akbari OA. The numerical investigation of angle of attack of inclined rectangular rib on the turbulent heat transfer of Water- Al2O3nanofluid in a tube. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;131:1106–16.
42. Sarlak R, Yousefzadeh SH, Akbari OA, Toghraie D, Sarlak S, Assadi F. The investigation of simultaneous heat transfer of water/Al2O3nanofluid in a close enclosure by applying homo- geneous magnetic field. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;133:674–88.
43. Mashayekhi R, Khodabandeh E, Bahiraei M, Bahrami L, Toghraie D, Akbari OA. Application of a novel conical strip insert to improve the efficacy of water–Ag nanofluid for uti- lization in thermal systems: a two-phase simulation. Energ Convers Manag. 2017;151:573–86.
44. Toghraie D, Davood Abdollah MM, Pourfattah F, Akbari OA, Ruhani B. Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer characteristics in smooth, sinusoidal and zigzag-shaped microchannel with and without nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6624-6.
45. Khodabandeh E, Rahbari A, Rosen MA, Ashrafi ZN, Akbari OA, Anvari AM. Experimental and numerical investigations on heat transfer of water-cooled lance for blowing oxidizing gas in electrical arc furnace. Energy Conserv Manag. 2017;148:43–56.
46. Gravndyan Q, Akbari OA, Toghraie D, Marzban A, Mashayekhi R, Karimi R, Pourfattah F. The effect of aspect ratios of rib on the heat transfer and laminar water/TiO2nanofluid flow in a two- dimensional rectangular microchannel. J Mol Liq.
2017;236:254–65.
47. Akbari OA, Karimipour A, Toghraie D, Karimipour A. Impact of ribs on flow parameters and laminar heat transfer of water–
aluminum oxide nanofluid with different nanoparticle volume fractions in a three-dimensional rectangular microchannel. Adv Mech Eng. 2016;7:1–11.
48. Akbari OA, Goodarzi M, Safaei MR, Zarringhalam M, Ahmadi Sheikh Shabaniand GR, Dahari M. A modified two-phase mix- ture model of nanofluid flow and heat transfer in 3-d curved microtube. Adv Powd Technol. 2016;2016(27):2175–85.
49. Behnampour A, Akbari OA, Safaei MR, Ghavami M, Marzban A, Ahmadi Sheikh Shabani GR, Zarringhalam M, Mashayekhi R. Analysis of heat transfer and nanofluid fluid flow in microchannels with trapezoidal, rectangular and triangular shaped ribs. Physica E. 2017;91:15–31.
50. Arani AAA, Akbari OA, Safaei MR, Marzban A, Alrashed AAAA, Ahmadi GR, Nguyen TK. Heat transfer improvement of water/single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) nanofluid in a novel design of a truncated double layered microchannel heat sink. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;113:780–95.
51. Heydari M, Toghraie D, Akbari OA. The effect of semi-attached and offset mid-truncated ribs and water/TiO2nanofluid on flow and heat transfer properties in a triangular microchannel. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2017;2:140–50.
52. Shamsi MR, Akbari OA, Marzban A, Toghraie D, Mashayekhi R. Increasing heat transfer of non-Newtonian nanofluid in rectangular microchannel with triangular ribs. Physica E.
2017;93:167–78.
53. Khodabandeh E, Pourramezan M, Pakravan MH. Effects of excess air and preheating on the flow pattern and efficiency of the radiative section of a fired heater. Appl Therm Eng.
2016;105:537–48.
54. Akbari OA, Afrouzi HH, Marzban A, Toghraie D, Malekzade H, Rabpour A. Investigation of volume fraction of nanoparticles effect and aspect ratio of the twisted tape in the tube. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6372- 7.
55. Akbari OA, Toghraie D, Karimipour A. Numerical simulation of heat transfer and turbulent flow of Water nanofluids copper oxide in rectangular microchannel with semi attached rib. Adv Mech Eng. 2016;8:1–25.
56. Rezaei O, Akbari OA, Marzban A, Toghraie D, Pourfattah F, Mashayekhi R. The numerical investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of turbulent flow in a triangular microchannel.
Physica E. 2017;93:179–89.
57. Toghraie D, Alempour AMB, Afrand M. Experimental deter- mination of viscosity of Water based magnetite nanofluid for application in heating and cooling systems. J Magn magn Mater.
2016;417:243–8.
58. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Wongwises S, Toghraie D. An experi- mental study on the effect of diameter on thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Fe/Water nanofluids. Therm: J Anal Calorim; 2015.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4328-8.
59. Esfe HM, Afrand M, Gharehkhani S, Rostamiand H, Toghraie D, Dahari M. An experimental study on viscosity of alumina- engine oil: Effects of temperature and nanoparticles concentra- tion. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;76:202–8.
60. Esfe HM, Afrand M, Yan WM, Yarmand H, Toghraie D, Dahari M. Effects of temperature and concentration on rheological behavior of MWCNTs/SiO2(20–80)-SAE40 hybrid nanolubri- cant. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;76:133–8.
61. Esfe HM, Ahangar MR, Rejvani M, Toghraie D, Hajmohammad MH. Designing an artificial neural network to predict dynamic viscosity of aqueous nanofluid of TiO2using experimental data.
Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;75:192–6.
62. Afrand M, Toghraie D, Sina N. Experimental study on thermal conductivity of Water-based Fe3O4 nanofluid: development of a new correlation and modeled by artificial neural network. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;75:262–9.
63. Afrand M, Sina N, Teimouri H, Mazaheri A, Safaei MR, Esfe MH, Kamali J, Toghrai D. Effect of magnetic field on free convection in inclined cylindrical annulus containing molten potassium. Int J Appl Mech. 2015;7:1550052.
64. Noorian H, Toghraie D, Azimian AR. Molecular dynamics simulation of Poiseuille flow in a rough nano channel with checker surface roughnesses geometry. Heat mass Transf.
2014;50:105–13.
65. Nazari S, Toghraie D. Numerical simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow of Water-CuO Nanofluid in a sinusoidal channel with a porous medium. Physica E. 2017;87:134–40.
66. Sajadifar SA, Karimipour A, Toghraie D. Fluid flow and heat transfer of non-Newtonian nanofluid in a microtube considering slip velocity and temperature jump boundary conditions. Eur J Mech B Fluids. 2017;61:25–32.
67. Aghanajafi A, Toghraie D. Mehmandoust B., Numerical simu- lation of laminar forced convection of water–CuO nanofluid inside a triangular duct. Physica E. 2017;85:103–8.
68. Afrand M, Toghraie D, Karimipour A, Wongwises SA.
Numerical study of natural convection in a vertical annulus filled with gallium in the presence of magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater. 2017;430:22–8.
69. Toghraie D, Mokhtari M, Afrand M. Molecular dynamic sim- ulation of copper and platinum nanoparticles poiseuille flow in a nanochannel. Physica E. 2016;84:152–61.
70. Semiromi DT, Azimian AR. Nanoscale Poiseuille flow and effects of modified Lennard-Jones potential function. Heat Mass Transf. 2010;46:791–801.
71. Semiromi DT, Azimian AR. Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid–vapor phase equilibrium by using the modified Lennard- Jones potential function. Heat mass Transf. 2010;46:287–94.
72. Semiromi DT, Azimian AR. Molecular dynamics simulation of nonodroplets with the modified Lennard-Jones potential func- tion. Heat Mass Transf. 2010;47:579–88.
73. Faridzadeh MR, Semiromi DT, Niroomand A. Analysis of laminar mixed convection in an inclined square lid-driven cavity with a nanofluid by using an artificial neural network. Heat Transf Res. 2014;45(4):361–90.
74. Barbe´s B, Pa´ramo R, Blanco E, Casanova C. Thermal conduc- tivity and specific heat capacity measurements of CuO nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115(2):1883–91.
75. Oveissi S, Toghraie D, Eftekhari SA. Longitudinal vibration and stability analysis of carbon nanotubes conveying viscous fluid.
Physica E. 2016;83:275–83.
76. Toghraie D. Numerical thermal analysis of water’s boiling heat transfer based on a turbulent jet impingement on heated surface.
Physica E. 2016;84:454–65.
77. Esfahani MA, Toghraie D. Experimental investigation for developing a new model for the thermal conductivity of silica/
water-ethylene glycol (40%–60%) nanofluid at different tem- peratures and solid volume fractions. J Mol Liq.
2017;232:105–12.
78. Zadkhast M, Toghraie D, Karimipour A. Developing a new correlation to estimate the thermal conductivity of MWCNT- CuO/Water hybrid nanofluid via an experimental investigation.
J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973- 017-62138.
79. Toghraie Semiromi D, Azimian AR. Molecular dynamics sim- ulation of slab geometry and the effect of cut-off radius. In:
Proceeding of the 13th Asian congress of fluid mechanics. 2010.
80. Oveisi S, Nahvi H, Toghraie D. Investigation of dynamical behavior (transverse vibration) and instability analysis of carbon nanotubes conveying nanofluid. J Solid Mech Eng.
2013;6(118):15–23.
81. Oveissi S, Eftekhari SA, Toghraie D. Longitudinal vibration and instabilities of carbon nanotubes conveying fluid considering size effects of nanoflow and nanostructure. Physica E.
2016;83:164–73.
82. Rezaei M, Azimian AR, Toghraie D. The surface charge density effect on the electro-osmotic flow in a nanochannel: a molecular dynamics study. Heat mass Transf. 2015;51:661–70.
83. Rezaei M, Azimian AR, Toghraie D. Molecular dynamics study of an electro-kinetic fluid transport in a charged nanochannel based on the role of the stern layer. Physica A. 2015;426:25–34.
84. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Bahiraei M, Toghraie D, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity modeling of MgO/EG nanofluids using experimental data and artificial neural network.
J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:287–94.
85. Esfe MH, Akbari M, Semiromi DT, Karimiopour A, Afrand M.
Effect of nanofluid variable properties on mixed convection flow and heat transfer in an inclined two-sided lid-driven cavity with sinusoidal heating on sidewalls. Heat Transf Res.
2014;45:409–32.
86. Karimipour A, Esfe MH, Safaei MR, Semiromi DT, Jafari S, Kazi SN. Mixed convection of copper–water nanofluid in a shallow inclined lid driven cavity using the lattice Boltzmann method. Physica A. 2014;402:150–68.
87. Afrand M, Toghraie D, Ruhani B. Effects of temperature and nanoparticles concentration on rheological behavior of Fe3O4– Ag/EG hybrid nanofluid: an experimental study. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2016;77:2016.
88. Hemmat ME, Yan WM, Afrand M, Sarraf M, Toghraie D, Dahari M. Estimation of thermal conductivity of Al2O3/Water (40%)–ethylene-glycol (60%) by artificial neural network and correlation using experimental data. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;74:125–8.
89. Toghraie D, Chaharsoghi VA, Afrand M. Measurement of thermal conductivity of ZnO–TiO2/EG hybrid nanofluid.
J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973- 016-5436-4.
90. Semiromi DT, Azimian AR. Molecular dynamics simulation of annular flow boiling with the modified Lennard-Jones potential function. Heat Mass Transf. 2012;48:141–52.
91. Kasaeian A, Bahrami L, Pourfayaz F, Khodabandeh E. Experi- mental studies on the applications of PCMs and Nano-PCMs in buildings: a critical review. Energy Build. 2017;154:96–112.
92. Safaei MR, Togun H, Vafai K, Kazi SN, Badarudin A. Inves- tigation of heat transfer enchantment in a forward-facing con- tracting channel using FMWCNT nanofluids. Numer Heat Transf Part A. 2014;66:1321–40.
93. Safaei MR. Mahian O. Garoosi F. Hooman K. Karimipour A.
Kazi SN. and Gharehkhani S. Investigation of Micro and Nano- sized Particle Erosion in a 908Pipe Bend Using a Two-Phase Discrete Phase Model, The Scientific World Journal. Vol. 2014, Article ID 740578, 11 pages, 2014.
94. Goodarzi M, Safaei MR, Vafai K, Ahmadi G, Dahari M, Jom- hari N, Kazi SN. Investigation of nanofluid mixed convection in a shallow cavity using a two-phase mixture model. Int J Therm Sci. 2014;75:204–20.
95. Safaei MR, Ahmadi G, Goodarzi MS, Safdari Shadloo M, Goshayeshi HR, Dahari M. Heat transfer and pressure drop in fully developed turbulent flow of graphene nanoplatelets–silver/
water nanofluids. Fluids. 2016;1(3):1–20.
96. Safaei MR, Ahmadi G, Goodarzi MS, Kamyar A, Kazi SN.
Boundary layer flow and heat transfer of FMWCNT/water nanofluids over a flat plate. Fluids. 2016;1(4):31.
97. Kherbeet AS, Safaei MR, Mohammed HA, Salman BH, Ahmed HE, Alawi OA, Al-Asadi MT. Heat transfer and fluid flow over microscale backward and forward facing step: a review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;76:237–44.
98. Goshayeshi HR, Goodarzi M, Dahari M. Effect of magnetic field on the heat transfer rate of kerosene/Fe2O3nanofluid in a copper oscillating heat pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2015;68:663–8.
99. Goodarzi M, Kherbeet AS, Afrand M, Sadeghinezhad E, Meh- rali M, Zahedi P, Wongwises S, Dahari M. Investigation of heat transfer performance and friction factor of a counter-flow dou- ble-pipe heat exchanger using nitrogen-doped, graphene-based nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;76:16–23.
100. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Yan W-M, Afrand M, Sina N. Study on thermal conductivity of water-based nanofluids with hybrid suspensions of CNTs/Al2O3 nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;124(1):455–60.
101. Hemmat Esfe M, Naderi A, Akbari M, Afrand M, Karimipour A.
Evaluation of thermal conductivity of COOH-functionalized MWCNTs/water via temperature and solid volume fraction by using experimental data and ANN methods. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121(3):1273–8.
102. Bashirnezhad K, Rashidi MM, Yang Z, Bazri S, Yan W-M. A comprehensive review of last experimental studies on thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim.
2015;122(2):863–84.
103. Esfe MH, Saedodin S. Turbulent forced convection heat transfer and thermophysical properties of MgO–water nanofluid with consideration of different nanoparticles diameter, an empirical study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119(2):1205–13.
104. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Asadi A, Karimipour A. Thermal con- ductivity and viscosity of Mg(OH)2-ethylene glycol nanofluids.
J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;120(2):1145–9.
105. Masoud Hosseini S, Moghadassi AR, Henneke D, Ali E. The thermal conductivities enhancement of mono ethylene glycol and paraffin fluids by addingb-SiC nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;101:113–8.
106. Tian F, Sun L, Venart JES, Prasad RC, Mojumdar SC. Devel- opment of a thermal conductivity cell with nanolayer coating for thermal conductivity measurement of fluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;94(1):37–43.
107. Barbe´s B, Pa´ramo R, Sobro´n Blanco E, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity measurements of liquids by means of a microcalorimeter. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;104:805–12.
108. Barbe´s B, Pa´ramo R, Sobro´n V, Blanco E, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Pin˜eiro MM, Legido JL, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity measurements of Al2O3nanofluids.
J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(2):1615–25.