IOS Press
Review Article
1
The prevalence of metabolic syndrome
in drivers: A meta-analysis and systematic review
2
3
4
Mohammadreza Soltaninejada,b, Hamed Yarmohammadic, Elham Madresed, Saeed Khaleghie, Mohsen Poursadeqiyanf,g, Mohsen Aminizadehh,iand Amin Saberiniaj,∗
5 6
aDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7 8
bRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
9
cResearch Center for Environmental Determinants of Health(RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
10 11
dDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
12 13
eDepartment of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
14
fDepartment of occupational health Engineering, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
15 16
gHealth Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
17
hHealth in Emergency and Disaster Research center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
18
iHealth in Emergency and Disaster Research center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
19 20
jDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
21 22
Received 16 May 2019
23
Accepted 27 February 2020
24
Abstract.
25
BACKGROUND:Metabolic syndrome is an increasing disorder, especially in night workers. Drivers are considered to work during 24 hours a day. Because of job characteristics such as stress, low mobility and long working hours, they are at risk of a metabolic syndrome disorder.
26 27 28
OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study is a meta-analysis and systematic review of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers.
29 30
METHODS:In this systematic review, articles were extracted from national and international databases: Scientific Infor- mation Database (SID), Iran Medex, Mag Iran, Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus. Data analysis was performed using meta-analysis and systematic review (random effect model). The calculation of heterogeneity was carried out using the I2 index and Cochran’s Q test. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software version 11.
31 32 33 34 35
∗Address for correspondence: Amin Saberinia, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. E-mail:
1051-9815/20/$35.00 © 2020 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
2 M. Soltaninejad et al. / The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers
RESULTS:A total of nine articles related to the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers in different regions of the world from 2008 to 2016 were obtained. The total sample size studied was 26156 with an average of 2906 samples per study.
The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers was 34% (95% CI: 30–37).
36 37 38
CONCLUSION:According to the results of this study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers is high. Occupational stress, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity cannot be cited as causes of metabolic syndrome prevalence in drivers. Therefore, to maintain and to improve the health of this group, the implementation of preventive, therapeutic and rehabilitation measures for these people as well as training should be considered.
39 40 41 42
Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, driver, meta-analysis, systematic review
43
1. Introduction
36
Metabolic syndrome (syndrome X) means the
37
simultaneous incidence of cardiovascular risk fac-
38
tors such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, glucose
39
intolerance, or impaired metabolism of insulin and
40
lipid disorders. This disease is also known as insulin
41
resistance syndrome and dysmetabolic syndrome [1].
42
The metabolic syndrome includes a set of risk fac-
43
tors that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease,
44
type 2 diabetes, and eventually increase cardiovas-
45
cular mortality in individuals [2]. Several factors are
46
involved in the etiology of metabolic syndrome, inc-
47
luding insulin resistance, obesity (especially abdom-
48
inal obesity), lipid abnormalities, impaired glucose
49
tolerance, hypertension, pro-inflammatory status,
50
genetic factors, intrauterine growth retardation, rapid
51
urbanization process, nutritional factors, inactivity,
52
social, economic and cultural factors, educational
53
level and psychosocial stress, environment [1]. The
54
syndrome is associated with other disorders including
55
stroke, osteoarthritis, some cancers, non-alcoholic
56
fatty liver, hyperuricemia, polycystic ovary syndrome
57
and obstructive sleep apnea; it also imposes heavy
58
costs on the health system, and, in general, it reduces
59
the quality of life. Regardless of the underlying cause,
60
the total mortality rate in people with this syndrome
61
is more than other people [3–5]. The syndrome has
62
attracted the attention of many researchers due to its
63
association with diabetes and cardiovascular disease,
64
as well as high prevalence among populations, and is
65
one of the issues recently addressed by epidemiolo-
66
gists [6].
67
The prevalence of metabolic syndrome varies in
68
societies and studies, due to its causes, differences in
69
race, and numerous definitions for this syndrome [7].
70
The prevalence of this syndrome is high in the West-
71
ern and Asian countries. A high prevalence of this
72
syndrome has also been reported in other countries
73
of the world [8–11]. The prevalence of this syndrome
74
in the United States has steadily risen, so that it affects
75
25% of the American adult population and 2.9% of
76
American teenagers [12]. Today, 24-hour operation is 77 an unavoidable component to continue the operating 78 in various industries. Night work is an essential con- 79 dition for a large part of the workforce. The police 80 forces, firefighters, Hospital staff and drivers are 81 considered as the occupations that have the activity 82 during 24 hours a day [13]. One of the characteris- 83 tics of a driving job is a long working time that can 84 be tedious. This job is relatively sedentary. Drivers 85 typically have only a short period of activity during 86 the loading and unloading. On the other hand, driv- 87
ing the heavy vehicles is a stressful and high-risk job, 88 and the combination of above factors with unhealthy 89 eating habits often leads to overweight and obesity in 90 this group of workers [14, 15]. Drivers, due to their 91 working conditions, are more susceptible to diseases, 92 especially the components of the metabolic syndrome 93 and its complications.. Although these diseases can 94 damage the driver, but due to the role and responsi- 95 bility of these people, the health of other individuals 96 can also be compromised. In the previous studies, the 97 occupational stress, lack of mobility, work shift, and 98 changes in food habits have been announced as the 99 major health risks among drivers [16]. Also, these dis- 100 orders affect the health status of individuals and are 101 led to increasing the risk of road accidents, increasing 102
the absenteeism and even temporary and permanent 103 disabilities in drivers [17]. Due to the high prevalence 104 of metabolic syndrome in the community, and the 105 severe health and economic consequences associated 106 with this problem, its higher risk for drivers compared 107 to other people and lack of precise awareness towards 108 its prevalence rate among the drivers, the purpose of 109 this study is a meta-analysis and systematic review of 110 the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers. 111
2. Method 112
In this meta-analysis and systematic review, the 113 prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers was 114 examined based on published articles in internal and 115 external journals without time limitations. All articles 116
Fig. 1. Flowchart The stages of the introduction of systematic and analytical studies.
in internal and external journals in the national
117
and international information databases (SID), Iran
118
Medex, Mag Iran, Google Scholar, Science Direct,
119
PubMed, Proquest and Scopus, which examined the
120
prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers, were
121
collected. The collected articles were searched with
122
appropriate keywords and their combination. Also,
123
the sources of the studied articles were reviewed
124
for access to other articles. At first, all articles in
125
which the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was
126
mentioned in the drivers were collected by the
127
researchers. All articles published in Persian and
128
English, which examined the prevalence of metabolic
129
syndrome in drivers, were included in the study. Data
130
extraction: Based on inclusion and exclusion crite-
131
ria, the abstracts of the articles were studied by the
132
researchers, and then unrelated articles and related
133
articles were identified to obtain their complete text
134
and to extract the data. A form was used for data
135
extraction which was including the variables, i.e., 136 number of samples, type of studies, age, geographi- 137 cal area, country, prevalence of metabolic syndrome, 138
sample size, authors’ name and year of publication 139 (Fig. 1). In this study, inclusion criteria were the 140 research which had the prevalence of metabolic syn- 141 drome in drivers, and the exclusion criteria included 142 the lack of access to full text of articles, inadequate 143 data, and non-relevance of studies with the subject. 144 The current study was conducted on the basis of 145 the meta-analysis and systematic review (PRISMA) 146 reporting system [18]. In addition, based on this, in 147 order to prevent the subversion, the search, selection 148 of studies, qualitative evaluation and data extraction, 149 was independently conducted by three researchers. 150 If there is a disagreement about the eligibility of an 151 article, that article is judged by another author who 152 is expert in the field of meta-analysis and system- 153
atic review. Then, the desired data obtained from 154
4 M. Soltaninejad et al. / The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers
the selected articles was recorded in a checklist with
155
information such as the title of the article, the first
156
author’s name, the year of publication, the location
157
of the study, the sample size, the target community,
158
and the access database.
159
2.1. Statistical analysis
160
Meta-analysis and systematic review was per-
161
formed to estimate the prevalence of metabolic
162
syndrome in drivers with averaged ages between
163
34.5 and 45.9 years. Heterogeneity was calculated
164
using the τ2 and Cochran’s Q tests, and inconsis-
165
tency was expressed as Higgins I2. For the Cochran’s
166
Q test, P< 0.10 was considered statistically signifi-
167
cant. I2values of 25%, 50% and 75% correspond to
168
low, moderate and high heterogeneity, respectively.
169
Considering the remarkable heterogeneity among
170
studies, pooled estimates of the prevalence and the
171
corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were
172
calculated using random effects models. The pooled
173
estimate Calculated after Freeman-Tukey Double
174
Arcsine Transformation to stabilize the variances.
175
We conducted sensitivity analyses by excluding each
176
study at a time from the Meta-analysis and system-
177
atic review, in order to examine its influence on the
178
pooled estimate. Potential cofactor associated with
179
heterogeneity (i.e. publication year) was also ana-
180
lyzed by a meta-regression. All statistical analyses
181
were performed using STATA version 11.0 (Stata
182
Corp, College Station, TX, USA) and the results were
183
represented as forest, bubble and funnel plots.
184
3. Results
185
3.1. Study characteristics
186
The characteristics of the included studies are pre-
187
sented in Table 1. These studies were published
188
between 2008 (Cavagioni LC and et al.) and 2016
189
(Ebrahimi and et al. & Prakaschandra R and et al.).
190
The sample size of the included articles varied from
191
117 (C´ardenas OA and et al.) to 12138 (Mohebbi and
192
et al.), with a total of 26156 cases.
193
3.2. Evaluation of heterogeneity and
194
meta-analysis
195
The results of Cochran’s Q test and I2 statis-
196
tics indicated substantial heterogeneity among the
197
included studies (Q= 165.75, d.f.=8, P< 0.001 and
198
Table 1
Description of the studies included in the Meta-analysis and systematic review
First Author publication Location Sample Prevalence
Year size of metabolic
syndrome
Cavagioni LC 2008 Brazil 258 0.24
(19)
Saberi H (16) 2009 Iran 429 0.36
Mohebbi I (20) 2009 Iran 626 0.32
YazdiZ (13) 2012 Iran 192 0.23
Mohebbi I (21) 2012 Iran 12138 0.31
Azak S (17) 2015 Iran 10000 0.34
C´ardenas OA (22) 2015 Colombia 117 0.49
Ebrahimi MH (23) 2016 Iran 1018 0.32
Prakaschandra R 2016 South Africa 1378 0.46 (24)
I2= 95.17). Thus, random effects model was used for 199 all analysis. The pooled prevalence of metabolic syn- 200
drome was 34% (95% CI: 30–37). As seen in Fig. 2, 201 the highest and lowest prevalence was reported by 202 C´ardenas OA and et al. in Colombia (49%, 95% CI: 203 40–58) and Yazdi Z and et al. in Iran (23%, 95% CI: 204
18–29) respectively. 205
3.3. Meta regression 206
Meta regression was used to explore the sources of 207
between-study heterogeneity, including the year of 208 study. According to the results and Fig. 3, although 209 the prevalence of metabolic syndrome increased in 210 years, this amount wasn’t statistically significant. So, 211 the year of study didn’t relate to prevalence (P> 0.05). 212
3.4. Publication bias 213
As seen in Fig. 4, the funnel plots showed sym- 214 metry, demonstrating the absence of publication bias 215 among the included studies. The Egger’s and Begg’s 216 tests also confirmed the absence of publication bias 217 among the included studies (P= 0.548 andP= 0.835, 218
respectively). 219
3.5. Sensitivity analysis 220
To evaluate the influence of each individual study, 221 we performed sensitivity analyses by excluding each 222 study from the Meta-analyses and comparing the po- 223 int estimates before and after excluding each specific 224 individual study. Based on the sensitivity analysis, 225 exclusion of individual studies did not change the 226 results substantially, with pooled prevalence.
Fig. 2. Forest plot showing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers.
Fig. 3. Meta-regression (bubble) plot of metabolic syndrome
prevalence based on year of study. Fig. 4. Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in Meta-analysis and systematic review for prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers.
6 M. Soltaninejad et al. / The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drivers
4. Discussion and conclusion
227
This meta-analysis and systematic review was con-
228
ducted to determine the prevalence of metabolic
229
syndrome in drivers. In the present study, the total
230
number of subjects was 26,156 in nine papers from
231
different parts of the world and published in the years
232
from 2008 to 2016 were entered into the final meta-
233
analysis and systematic review; the average sample
234
size in these studies was 2906. The prevalence of
235
metabolic syndrome in drivers was calculated to be
236
34% (95% CI: 30–37). The highest prevalence of
237
metabolic syndrome was related to the study con-
238
ducted by C´ardenas in Colombia in (49%, 95% CI:
239
40–58) and the lowest prevalence was observed in
240
Iran in the study of Yazdi (23%, 95% CI: 18–29).
241
Alizadeh et al. examined the prevalence of metabolic
242
syndrome in the general population in Iran. The
243
results of this review showed that the prevalence of
244
metabolic syndrome in adults is relatively high [1].
245
In the studies, the prevalence rate was obtained to be
246
between 20% and 35.8%. These rates are significantly
247
higher than estimated global prevalence (20–25%)
248
[1]. In Italy, the prevalence rate was 22% in men and
249
18% in women [25]. The prevalence rate in the United
250
States was 22.9% [26]. According to the results of
251
this study, the prevalence rate of metabolic syndrome
252
among the drivers is higher than its rate in the general
253
population and some other occupations. The reason
254
for this may be factors such as unavoidable inactivity,
255
high caloric intake, lack of awareness, lack of health
256
check by these individuals, occupational stress and
257
night work [16]. Drivers have irregular work hours
258
because of their work needs. Long working hours,
259
including night work are the main feature of this job.
260
Night work may lead to chronic sleep deprivation
261
and obesity which are commonly seen among these
262
people [27]. Among the drivers, the high prevalence
263
of wrong inactive lifestyles or sedentary lifestyles,
264
inappropriate food habits, and obesity is observed.
265
They usually smoke and have high blood pressure
266
[27, 28]. These features pose this population at risk
267
for diseases such as cardiovascular, digestive and
268
metabolic diseases [29]. Stoohs et al. stated that the
269
prevalence of hypertension among truck drivers is
270
16and high percentage of these people was unaware
271
of their illness [30]. High blood pressure in drivers is
272
likely to be due to low mobility and lifestyle, which
273
requires more attention [31]. Irregular working hours
274
are one of the important factors in the development
275
of obesity in drivers, and it also led to lessening the
276
chance for regular physical activity [32]. Moreover,
277
other factors of high weight in drivers can be the use 278 of fatty foods in restaurants and sedentary lifestyle 279 and lack of information on overweight effects [16]. 280 Whitfield-Jacobson et al. suggested that the imple- 281 mentation of health programs for drivers can prevent 282 several diseases such as obesity [33]. These programs 283 can include training and supporting activities and 284 providing nutritional advice to restaurants. The devel- 285 opment of such Preventive programs is justified not 286 only for economic reasons but also is important for 287 driver safety [29]. Metabolic syndrome is an impor- 288 tant medical, social, and economic concern and its 289 prevalence, in developing countries, is one of the 290 increasing medical problems due to increasing the 291 sedentary lifestyle and obesity. Therefore, the impor- 292
tance of examining the prevalence of this disease 293 through a similar screening and diagnostic guideline, 294 as well as considering the risk factors and different 295 ethnic groups seems to be necessary [1]. 296
5. Conclusion 297
According to the results of this study, the preva- 298 lence of metabolic syndrome in drivers is high. 299 Occupational stress, unhealthy diet and physical 300 inactivity cannot be attributed to the prevalence of 301 metabolic syndrome in drivers. Therefore, it is sug- 302 gested that training of these people should be carried 303 out with preventive measures, treatment and disabil- 304
ity, in order to maintain and improve the health of this 305
group. 306
Conflict of interest 307
None to report. 308
References 309
[1] Alizade Z, Azadbakht L. Review of epidemiology of 310 metabolic syndrome in Iran. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and 311
Metabolism. 2017;15(3):143-57. 312
[2] Mehrdad SM, Hosseinpanah F, Azizi F. [Metabolic syn- 313
drome prevalence in 3-9 years old children: Tehran 314
Glucose and Lipid Study (Persian)]. Research in Medicine. 315
2006;30(4):337-46. 316
[3] Jaber LA, Brown MB, Hammad A, et al. The prevalence of 317
the metabolic syndrome among Arab Americans. Diabetes 318
Care. 2004;27:234-8. 319
[4] McNeill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, et al. The 320
metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardio- 321
vascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities’ 322
study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:385-90. 323
[5] Shiwaku K, Nogi A, Kitajima K, Anuurad E, Enkhmaa
324
B, Yamasaki M, Kim JM, Kim IS, Lee SK, Oyunsuren T,
325
Yamane Y. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using the
326
modified ATP III definitions for workers in Japan, Korea and
327
Mongolia. Journal of Occupational Health. 2005;47(2):126-
328
35.
329
[6] Marek H. Dominiczak. Metabolic syndrome editorial com-
330
ment. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2003;14 329-32.
331
[7] Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, Shaw J. the IDF Epidemiology
332
Task Force Consensus Guoup. The metabolic syndrome – a
333
new world-wide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059-63.
334
[8] Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR,
335
Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and
336
associated risk factor findings in the US population from the
337
Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,
338
1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:427-36.
339
[9] Oh JY, Hong YS, Sung YA, Barrett-Connor E. Prevalence
340
and factor analysis of metabolic syndrome in an urban
341
Korean population. Diabets Care. 2004;27:2027-32.
342
[10] Makuyana D, Gomo Z, Munyombwe T, Matenga JA, Hakim
343
JG. Metabolic syndrome disorders in urban black Zim-
344
babweans with type 2 Diabetes mellitus. Cent Afr J Med.
345
2004;50:24-9.
346
[11] Isezuo SA, Ezunu E. Demographic and clinical correlates
347
of metabolic syndrome in Native African type-2 diabetic
348
patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:557-63.
349
[12] Tan CE, Ma S, Wai D, et al. Can we apply the National
350
Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel def-
351
inition of the Metabolic syndrome to Asians? Diabetes Care.
352
2004;27:1182-6.
353
[13] Yazdi Z, Sareshtehdary M, Tayefi M. Prevalence of
354
Metabolic Syndrome among Truck Drivers and Its Relation
355
to Shift Work. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2012;5(4):68-72.
356
[14] Horne J, Reyner L. Vehicle Accidents Related to Sleep: A
357
Review. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56(5):289-94.
358
[15] George CF. Sleep Apnea, Alertness, and Motor Vehicle
359
Crashes. Am J Perspir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(10):954-56.
360
[16] Saberi H, Moraveji A, Parastouie K. Metabolic syndrome
361
among professional bus and truck drivers in Kashan, 2008.
362
Iran South Med J. 2009;12(2):126-32.
363
[17] Azak S, Mohebbi I, Salarilak S, Gharaaghaji Asl R. Preva-
364
lence of Metabolic Syndrome and Related Risk Factors in
365
Professional Drivers in West Azerbaijan Province, 2010-
366
2012. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2015;26(9):775-84.
367
[18] Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. eds. Prisma-p
368
Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and
369
meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and
370
explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
371
[19] Cavagioni LC, Bensen˜or IM, Halpern A, Pierin AM.
372
S´ındrome metab´olica em motoristas profissionais de trans-
373
porte de cargas da rodovia BR-116 no trecho Paulista-R´egis
374
Bittencourt. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia &
375
Metabologia. 2008;52(6):1015-23.
376
[20] Mohebbi I, Matinkhah M, Nabizadeh F, Blouri A, Saba 377
A, Shirazi A. The Metabolic Syndrome and its Associa- 378
tion with Over Time Driving in Iranian Professional Bus 379
Drivers. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene. 380
2010;2(1):37-41. 381
[21] Mohebbi I, Saadat S, Aghassi M, Shekari M, Matinkhah 382
M, Sehat S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranian 383
professional drivers: results from a population-based study 384
of 12,138 men. Plos One. 2012;7(2):e31790. 385
[22] C´ardenas OA. Metaloproteinasas y leptina en conduc- 386
tores de veh´ıculo de servicio p´ublico con s´ındrome 387
metab´olico en Armenia, Quind´ıo. Endocrinolog´ıa y 388
Nutrici´on. 2015;62(9):430-6. 389
[23] Ebrahimi MH, Delvarianzadeh M, Saadat S. Prevalence of 390
metabolic syndrome among Iranian occupational drivers. 391
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & 392
Reviews. 2016;10(1): S46-51. 393
[24] Prakaschandra R, Naidoo DP. Increased waist circumfer- 394
ence is the main driver for the development of the metabolic 395
syndrome in South African Asian Indians. Diabetes & 396
Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2016 397
Dec 15. 398
[25] Giampaoli S, Stamler J, Donfrancesco C, Panico S, Vanuzzo 399
D, Cesana G, et al. The metabolic syndrome: a critical 400
appraisal based on the Cuore epidemiologic study. Prev 401
Med. 2009;48(6):525-31. 402
[26] Beltran-Sanchez H, Harhay MO, Harhay MM, McEllig- 403
ott S. Prevalence and trends of metabolic syndrome in 404
the adult U.S. population, 1999-2010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 405
2013;62(8):697-703. 406
[27] Moreno CR, Louzada FM, Teixeira LR, Borges F, Lorenzi- 407
Filho G. Short sleep is associated with obesity among truck 408
drivers. Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1295-303. 409
[28] Hakkanen H, Summala H. Sleepiness at work among com- 410
mercial truck drivers. Sleep. 2000;23(1):49-57. 411
[29] Siedlecka J. [Selected work-related health problems in 412
drivers of public transport vehicles]. Med Pr. 2006;57(1):47- 413
52. 414
[30] Stoohs RA, Bingham LA, Itoi A, Guilleminault C, Dement 415
WC. Sleep and sleep-disordered breathing in commercial 416
long-haul truck drivers. Chest. 1995;107(5):1275-82. 417
[31] Wang PD, Lin RS. Coronary heart disease risk factors in 418
urban bus drivers. Public Health. 2001;115:261-4. 419
[32] Pasqua IC, Moreno CR. The nutritional status and eat- 420
ing habits of shift workers: a chronobiological approach. 421
Chronobiol Int. 2004;21(6):949-60. 422
[33] Whitfield Jacobson PJ, Prawitz AD, Lukaszuk JM. Long- 423
haul truck drivers want healthful meal options at truckstop 424
restaurants. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(12):2125-9. 425