A strong limit theorem expressed by inequalities for the sequences of absolutely continuous random variables
Wen Liu and Yujin Wang
(Received September 4, 2000) (Revised April 17, 2002)
Abstract. Let fXn;nb1g be an arbitrary sequence of dependent absolutely con- tinuous random viariables,fBn;nb1gbe Borel sets on the real line, andIBnðxÞbe the indicator function of Bn. In this paper, the limit properties of fIBnðXnÞ;nb1g are studied, and a kind of strong limit theorem represented by inequalities with random bounds is obtained.
1. Introduction
Let fXn;nb1g be a sequences of absolutely continuous random variables on the probability spaceðW;F;PÞwith the joint density functiongnðx1;. . .;xnÞ,
n¼1;2;. . .: Let fkðxkÞ, k¼1;2;. . .; be an arbitrary sequence of density
functions, and call Qn
k¼1
fkðxkÞ the reference product density. Let
rnðoÞ ¼ Qn
k¼1
fkðXkÞ
gnðX1;. . .;XnÞ if the denominator>0;
0 otherwise,
8>
><
>>
:
ð1Þ
where o is a sample point. In statistical terms, rnðoÞ is called the likelihood ratio, which is of fundamental importance in the theory of testing the statistical hypotheses (cf. [1, p. 483]; [3, p. 388]). Let
rðoÞ ¼ lim inf
n
1
n lnrnðoÞ ð2Þ
with ln 0¼ y. rðoÞ is called asymptotic log-likelihood ratio. Obviously, rnðoÞ10 if
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 60F15, 60F99
Keywords and phrases. Strong limit theorem represented by inequalities, Strong law of large numbers, Likelihood ratio, Supermartingale.
gnðx1;. . .;xnÞ ¼Yn
k¼1
fkðxkÞ; nb1;
and it will be shown in (13) that rðoÞb0 a.e. in any case. Hence rðoÞ can be used as a random measure of the deviation between the true joint densitygnðx1;. . .;xnÞ ðn¼1;2;. . .Þand the reference product density Qn
k¼1
fkðxkÞ.
Roughly speaking, this deviation may be regarded as the one between fXn;nb1g and the independence case. The smaller rðoÞ is, the smaller the deviation is. The purpose of this paper is to establish a kind of strong limit theorem represented by inequalities with random bounds for the dependent random variables, by using the notion of asymptotic log-likelihood and the martingale convergence theorem, and to extend the analytic technique proposed by Liu [4], [5], and Liu and Yang [6] to the case of absolutely continuous random variables.
2. Main result
Theorem. Let fXn;nb1g, rnðoÞ, rðoÞbe given as above, fBn;nb1g be a sequence of Borel sets of the real line, and IBn be the indicator function of Bn. Let
b¼lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk ð3Þ
and
D1 ¼ fo:rðoÞabg; D2¼ fo:rðoÞbbg:
Then
ðaÞ lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
a2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p þrðoÞ a:e:; ð4Þ
ðbÞ lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
b2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p a:e: on D1; ð5Þ
and
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
bbrðoÞ a:e: on D2: ð6Þ
Proof. Let l>0 be a constant, and let
hkðxkÞ ¼
lfkðxkÞ 1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
xkABk; fkðxkÞ
1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
xkBBk: 8>
>>
><
>>
>>
:
ð7Þ
It is easy to see that Qn
k¼1
hkðxkÞ is a product density function of n variables.
Let
tnðl;oÞ ¼ 8>
><
>>
: Qn
k¼1
hkðXkÞ
gnðX1;. . .;XnÞ if the denominator>0;
0 otherwise:
ð8Þ
Then tnðl;oÞ is a nonnegative supermartingale that converges a.e. Hence there exists AðlÞAF, PðAðlÞÞ ¼1, such that
lim sup
n
1
n lntnðl;oÞa0; oAAðlÞ: ð9Þ Letting l¼1 in (9), we obtain
lim sup
n
1
n lnrnðoÞa0; oAAð1Þ: ð10Þ This implies that
rðoÞb0; oAAð1Þ: ð11Þ
We have by (7) Yn
k¼1
hkðXkÞ ¼Yn
k¼1
lIBkðxkÞfkðxkÞ 1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
¼lTk¼1n IBkðxkÞYn
k¼1
fkðxkÞ 1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
: ð12Þ
It follows from (1), (8), and (12) that
lntnðl;oÞ ¼Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞlnlXn
k¼1
ln 1þ ðl1Þ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
þlnrnðoÞ:
ð13Þ We have by (9), and (13)
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞlnlXn
k¼1
ln 1þ ðl1Þ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
þlnrnðoÞ
! a0;
oAAðlÞ: ð14Þ (a) Let l>1. Dividing the two sides of (16) by lnl, we obtain
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl þlnrnðoÞ lnl
! a0;
oAAðlÞ: ð15Þ By (15) and (2), we have
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk lnl
! arðoÞ
lnl; oAAðlÞ ð16Þ By (16), (3), the property of the superior limit
lim sup
n ðanbnÞad)lim sup
n ðancnÞalim sup
n ðbncnÞ þd; and the inequality 0alnð1þxÞax ðxb0Þ, we have
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
alim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl
ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
! þrðoÞ
lnl
alim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl
ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
! þrðoÞ
lnl
ab l1 lnl 1
þrðoÞ
lnl; oAAðlÞ: ð17Þ
By using the inequality 1l1 <lnl ðl>1Þ, we have by (17),
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
abðl1Þ þlrðoÞ
l1; oAAðlÞ:
ð18Þ
Let Q be the set of rational numbers in the interval ð1;þyÞ, and let A¼ 7lAQAðlÞ, gðl;rÞ ¼bðl1Þ þlr=ðl1Þ. Then we have by (20),
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
agðl;rðoÞÞ; oAA;lAQ: ð19Þ Let b>0. It is easy to see that if r>0, then gðl;rÞ as a function of l attains its smallest value gð1þ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pr=b
;rÞ ¼2 ffiffiffiffiffi pbr
þr on the interval ð1;þyÞ, and gðl;0Þ is increasing on the interval ð1;þyÞ and liml!1þ0gðl;0Þ ¼0.
For each oAAVAð1Þ, if rðoÞ0 y, take lnðoÞAQ, n¼1;2;. . .; such that lnðoÞ !1þ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
rðoÞ=b
p . We have by the continuity of g with respect to l,
n!þlimygðlnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ ¼2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p þrðoÞ: ð20Þ
By (19),
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
agðlnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ; n¼1;2;. . .: ð21Þ By (20) and (21),
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
a2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p þrðoÞ; oAAVAð1Þ:
ð22Þ If rðoÞ ¼y, (22) holds trivially. Since PðAVAð1ÞÞ ¼1, (4) holds by (22) when b>0.
When b¼0, we have by letting l¼e in (19),
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
arðoÞ; oAAðeÞ: ð23Þ
Since PðAðeÞÞ ¼1, (4) also holds by (23) when b¼0.
(b) Let 0<l<1. Dividing the two sides of (14) by lnl, we obtain
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl þlnrnðoÞ lnl
! b0;
oAAðlÞ: ð24Þ By (24) and (2), we have
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk lnl
! brðoÞ
lnl ; oAAðlÞ:
ð25Þ By (25), (3), the property of the inferior limit
lim inf
n ðanbnÞbd )lim inf
n ðancnÞblim inf
n ðbncnÞ þd;
and the inequality lnð1þxÞax ð1<xa0Þ, we have
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
blim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
ln½1þ ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl
ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
! þrðoÞ
lnl
blim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
ðl1ÞÐ
Bk fkðxkÞdxk
lnl
ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
! þrðoÞ
lnl
bb l1 lnl 1
þrðoÞ
lnl; oAAðlÞ: ð26Þ
By using the inequalities 1l1<lnl<0 and lnl<l1<0 ð0<l<1Þ, we have by (26),
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
bbðl1Þ þ rðoÞ
l1; oAAðlÞVAð1Þ:
ð27Þ Let Q be the set of rational numbers in the interval ð0;1Þ, and let A¼ 7lAQAðlÞ, hðl;rÞ ¼bðl1Þ þr=ðl1Þ. Then we have by (27),
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
bhðl;rðoÞÞ; oAAVAð1Þ;lAQ: ð28Þ Let b>0. It is easy to see that if 0<r<b, then hðl;rÞas a function of l attains its largest value hð1 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pr=b
;rÞ ¼ 2 ffiffiffiffiffi pbr
on the interval ð0;1Þ, and hðl;0Þis increasing on the intervalð0;1Þand liml!10hðl;0Þ ¼0, and hðl;bÞ ¼ b½l1þ1=ðl1Þ is decreasing on the interval ð0;1Þ and liml!0þ hðl;bÞ ¼ 2b. For each oAAVAð1ÞVD1, take tnðoÞAQ, n¼1;2;. . .; such that tnðoÞ !1 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
rðoÞ=b
p . We have
n!þlimy hðtnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ ¼ 2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p : ð29Þ
By (28), we have
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
bhðtnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ; n¼1;2;. . .: ð30Þ By (29) and (30),
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
b2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p ; oAAVAð1ÞVD1:
ð31Þ Since PðAVAð1ÞÞ ¼1, (5) holds by (31) when b>0.
When b¼0, rðoÞ ¼0 for oAD1VAð1Þ. Hence we have by (28),
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
b0; oAAðlÞVAð1ÞVD1;0<l<1:
ð32Þ Since PðAðlÞVAð1ÞÞ ¼1, (5) also holds by (32) when b¼0.
It is easy to see that when r>bb0, hðl;rÞ as a function of l is decreasing on the interval ð0;1Þ and liml!0þhðl;rÞ ¼ ðrþbÞ. For each oAAVAð1ÞVD2, when rðoÞ0 y, take lnðoÞAQ, n¼1;2;. . .; such that lnðoÞ !0. We have
n!ylim hðlnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ ¼ rðoÞ b: ð33Þ By (28), we have
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
bhðlnðoÞ;rðoÞÞ; n¼1;2;. . .: ð34Þ It follows from (33) and (34) that,
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
brðoÞ b; oAAVAð1ÞVD2: ð35Þ Obviously, (35) also holds when rðoÞ ¼y. Since PðAVAð1ÞÞ ¼1, (6) fol- lows from (35) directly.
3. Some corollaries
Corollary 1. Let B be a Borel set of the real line, SnðB;oÞ be the number of occurrence of Xkð1akanÞ in B, that is,
SnðB;oÞ ¼Xn
k¼1
IBðXkÞ:
Then under the conditions of the theorem, we have
lim sup
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
SnðB;oÞ ð
B
fkðxkÞdxk
a2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p þrðoÞ a:e:;
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
SnðB;oÞ ð
B
fkðxkÞdxk
b2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi brðoÞ
p a:e: on D1;
lim inf
n
1 n
Xn
k¼1
SnðB;oÞ ð
B
fkðxkÞdxk
bbrðoÞ a:e: on D2:
Proof. Letting Bk ¼B ðk¼1;2;. . .Þ, the corollary follows from the above theorem directly.
The strong law of large numbers for IBnðXnÞ, nb1; is a corollary of the above theorem.
Corollary 2. If fXk;kb1g is independent random variables with density function fkðxkÞ, then
limn
1 n
Xn
k¼1
IBkðXkÞ ð
Bk
fkðxkÞdxk
¼0 a:e: ð36Þ
Proof. In this case,gnðx1;. . .;xnÞ ¼ Qn
k¼1
fkðxkÞ, andrðoÞ ¼0. Hence (38) follows from (4) and (5) directly.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the referee for his helpful suggestion.
References
[ 1 ] P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure. Wiley, New York, 1986.
[ 2 ] K. L. Chung, A Course in Probability Theory. Academic Press, New York, 1968.
[ 3 ] R. G. Laha and V. K. Rohatig, Probability Theory. Wiley, New York, 1979.
[ 4 ] Liu Wen, An analytic technique to prove Borel strong law of large numbers, Amer.
Math. Monthly,98-2(1991), 146–148.
[ 5 ] Liu Wen, Relative entropy densities and a class of limit theorems of the sequences of m-valued random variables, Ann. Probab. 18(1990), 829–839.
[ 6 ] Wen Liu and Weiguo Yang, The Markov approximation of the sequences of N-valued rondom variables and a class of small deviation theorems, Stochastic Process. Appl.
89(2000), 117–130.
Department of Mathematics Hebei University of Technology
Tianjin 300130, CHINA Department of Basic Science Tianjin University of Commerce
Tianjin 300400, CHINA