EU조정지침의 이행입법에 대한 비교법적 검토와 시사점 - 영국

(1)

YYX

- , , -

I.

II. EU 1.

2.

3.

III.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

IV.

* ,

** 2016 2 17

, .

: 2016. 4. 30. / : 2016. 5. 26. / : 2016. 5. 30.

(2)

YYY

I.

(mediation) ADR .

.

, ,

, .

,

, EU 2008 EU

(Mediation Directive)

¹⁾

EU ·

. (cross-border disputes)

²⁾

, ,

.

³⁾

. , ,

1) 2008 EU ‘2008 5 21 EU

’ (Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters) ,

2008 6 13 . Official Journal L136/3 (May 21, 2008).

2) EU ‘ ’ (cross border disputes)

, ,

, ( 5 )

. EU 2(1) . ‘ ’ (Brussels Convention)

Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 59 60 . ,

. ,

(statutory seat), (central administration) (principal

place of business) . (trust)

, .

3) EU 1 .

(3)

YYZ

.

⁴⁾

EU · ,

( ) , , , ,

14

. · EU

.

EU (Directive)

,

EU EU

. EU 28

, EU

.

EU , ,

⁵⁾

EU EU

4) EU (30).

5) (2014) , EU

.

10,000 , , , 4 14%

5,000 ~ 10,000 , 2 7%

2,000 ~ 5,000 , , 3 11%

500 ~ 2,000 , , , ,

, 6 21%

500

, , ,

, , , ,

,

13 46%

European Parliament, ‘Rebooting’ the Mediation Directive: Assessing The Limited Impact of Its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU (January, 2014)

(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/493042/IPOL-JURI_ET(2014)4 93042_EN.pdf, 2015 11 13 ), p.6.

(4)

YY[

.

II. EU

EU 2011 5 21 EU

, . 2016 3

. EU ,

, EU

.

2012 7 26 ‘

’(Gesetz zur Förderung der Mediation und anderer Verfahren der außergerichtlichen Konfliktbeilegung: ‘2012 ’ )

⁶⁾

EU

. (Mediationsgesetz)

(Zivilprozessordnung)

.

⁷⁾

, ,

,

2012 7 26 .

⁸⁾

, ,

.

⁹⁾

6) Gesetz zur Förderung der Mediation und anderer Verfahren der außergerichtlichen Konfliktbeilegung, BGBI. 2012. I, 1577, SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP, The New German Mediation Act Paving the Way for Mediation As Established Standard in Dispute Resolution? (2012)(http://www.shearman.co m/~/media/Files/Document-Manager-Files-from-BDS/MediationsG.pdf, 2015 12 5 ), p.1.

7) Id.

8) European Parliament, op. cit., p.31.

(5)

YY\

.

¹⁰⁾

,

.

¹¹⁾

.

,

.

¹²⁾

EU

.

¹³⁾

9

, ( 1 ),

( 2 ), ( 3 ), ( 4 ),

( 5 ), ,

( 6

~ 9 ) .

¹⁴⁾

, ,

.

¹⁵⁾

2014

2016 3 .

9) , “2012 ”, 16 2 , 2013, 417 .

10) European Parliament, op. cit., p.31.

11) , , 417 .

12) Id.

13) European Parliament, op. cit. p.31.

14) Linklaters, Commercial mediation - a comparative review (2013) (http://www.linklaters.com/Insights/

Commercial-mediation-comparative-review-2013/Pages/Index.aspx, 2015 12 10 ), p.17.

(6)

YY]

,

, .

, , .

.

¹⁶⁾

,

1997 (Civil Procedure Act of 1997) (Civil Procedure Rules: ‘CPR’ )

¹⁷⁾

( ) (pre-actions protocols)

¹⁸⁾

, ADR

.

¹⁹⁾

1999 4 , 2011 10 CPR ,

ADR , ADR

.

²⁰⁾

16) Id., pp.65-66.

17) Id., p.65.

18) ( ) (Pre-Action Protocols) . Practice Directions-

Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols; Pre-action Protocol for the Construction and Engineering Dispute; Pre-Action Protocol for Defamation; Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims;

Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes; Pre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence; Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review; Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims; Pre-Action Protocol for Housing Disrepair Cases; Pre-Action Protocol for Possession claims based on Mortage or Home Purchase Plan Arrears in Respect of Residential Property;

Pre-Action Protocol for Law Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents; Pre-Action Protocol for Claims for Damages in Relation to the Physical State of Commercial Property at Termination of a Tenacy; Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers’

Liability and Public Liability) Claims.

(http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/menus/protocol.htm, 2016 3 ).

19) Michel Kallipetis · Stephen Ruttle, “Better Dispute Resolution - the Development and Practice of Mediation in the United Kingdom between 1995-2000” in Jean - Claude Goldsmith, Gerald H. Pointon, Arnold Ingen-Housz (eds.), ADR in Business, KLUWER LAW International, The Netherlands: 2006, p.191.

20) Id.; CPR 44.3(4)~(5),Germany and the European Association for Judges for Mediation (GEMME),

(7)

YY^

CPR , ADR

, ADR 3

ADR .

²¹⁾

CPR

,

²²⁾

‘ ’ (active

case management) “ADR ,

, ADR

.”

²³⁾

,

, , ,

,

, ,

.

²⁴⁾

.

, , ADR

. ADR

, ADR

.

²⁵⁾

EU ( , ,

) ,

, , EU

. EU

EU Handbook on Mediation: Mediation Law and Practice in Other EU Countries - United Kingdom (2012)(http:www.mediation-net.eu/pdf/.../analysis-concise_text2.pdf, 2015 12 1

).

21) Kallipetis · Ruttle, op. cit., p.191.

22) CPR 1.1.

23) CPR 1.4.(2)(e).

24) CPR 1.1.(2).

25) GEMME, op. cit.

(8)

YY_

EU (

, ,

) ,

‘2011 (EU ) ’(Cross-Border Mediation (EU Directive)

Regulations 2011, 2011 5 20 )

²⁶⁾

(CPR) Part 78

(2011 4 6 ) .

²⁷⁾

EU ‘2011 ’ (Cross-Border

Mediation (Scotland) Regulation 2011) . EU

7 ( ) ,

8 .

. ,

. , EU ‘2011

’ (2011 Cross Border Mediation Regulations) ‘2011 ( )

’ (2011 Rules of the Court of Judicature) .

EU 7 , 8

9 .

²⁸⁾

EU

1995 2 8 (Loi n° 92-95 du 8 février 1995:

‘1995 ’ )

²⁹⁾

26) Statuary Instruments 2011 No.1133 (Mediation, The Cross-Border Mediation (EU Directive) Regulation 2011).

27) Linklaters, op. cit., p.43; EU 7 ( ) 8 (

) ‘2011 (EU ) ’ , EU

6 ( ), 7 ( ) CPR Part 78

(Section III - Mediation Directive) , Parts 5, 7, 8, 31, 32 .#GEMME, op. cit.

(9)

YY`

,

³⁰⁾

EU , ,

,

. EU

.

³¹⁾

2011 11 16 EU (Ordonnance

No. 2011-1540: ‘2011 ’ )

³²⁾

. 2011

, EU ·

EU

29) 1995 Loi n° 92-95 du 8 février 1995 relative à l'organisation des jurisdictions et à la procédure civile, pénale et administrative . www.legifrance.gouv.fr

.

30) (Code de procédure civil) . 1995 2

8 Title VI bis (médiation) , 131-1

131-15 , , , ,

, , .

, 1441-4

(out-of-court settlement)

. ,

. , 2002 3 4

(mediator) (

373-2-10 ) , 2004 5 26 , 255-1

255-2

.

, “ ADR ”, 29 ,

, 2009 , 474 ~ 475 . 31) European Parliament, op. cit., p.26.

32) Ordonnance n° 2011-1540 du 16 Novembre 2011 portant transposition de la Directive 2008/52/CE and Décret n° 2012-66 du 20 Janvier 2012 - art.3. ,

, (Conseil D’État)

2009 (Développer la mediation dans le cadre de l'Union Euroéenne)

, ,

. , , 473 .

(10)

YZW

. (

) (Conciliateurs de Justice)

, (judicial mediation), (conventional mediation)

. , .

³³⁾

2011

2012 1 20 (Decree n°2012-66) ,

(conventional mediation) 1530 ~ 1535 .

³⁴⁾

III.

EU , (mediation) ,

(mediator)

(structured

process) .

³⁵⁾

‘ ’

.

³⁶⁾

, 3

(evaluative

33) Linklaters, op. cit., p.14.

34) European Parliament, op. cit., p.26; Code de procédure civile, Livre V: La résolution amiable des différends, Titre 1er: La Médiation et la conciliation conventionnelles (Articles 1530 - 1531), Chapitre 1er: La médiation conventionnelle (Arts. 1532-1535).

35) EU 3(a) .

36) EU (6).

(11)

YZX

mediation) (conciliation) .

(11)

(judicial conciliation) , ,

,

.

, EU

.

(Mediationsgesetz) Section 1(1) , ‘ ’ 1

,

, , ‘ ’

, .

³⁷⁾

CPR (ADR) “

”

³⁸⁾

,

(mediation) .

³⁹⁾

37) Mediationsgesetz (MediationsG) § 1 Begriffsbestimmungen ‘ ’ ‘ ’ :

“(1) Mediation ist ein vertrauliches und strukturiertes Verfahren, bei dem Parteien mithilfe eines oder mehrerer Mediatoren freiwillig und eigenverantwortlich eine einvernehmliche Beilegung ihres Konflikts anstreben.

(2) Ein Mediator ist eine unabhängige und neutrale Person ohne Entscheidungsbefugnis, die die Parteien durch die Mediation führt.”

38) “A collective description of methods of resolving disputes otherwise than through the normal trial process.”, CPR Glossary.

(12)

YZY

ADR (mediation) ADR

.

⁴⁰⁾

, 2011

, ‘ , 3 ,

’ .

⁴¹⁾

EU ,

.

⁴²⁾

, EU

.

⁴³⁾

.

⁴⁴⁾

.

39) Alxander J Oddy, Mediation Country Report, England and Wales, JAMS International ADR Center (http://www.adrcenter.com/jamsinternational/civil-justice/Mediation_Country_Report_En gland_and_Wales.pdf, 2015 11 1 ).

40) Kallipetis · Ruttle, op. cit., p.191, , “ADR :

”, 13 9 , , 2009, 492

17) .

41) Ordonnance n° 2011-1540 du 16 novembre 2011 protant transposition de la directive 2008/52/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 21 mai 2008 sur certains aspects de la médiation en matière civile et commerciale, Art. 1, JORF n° 0266 du 17 novembre 2011, p. 19286.

42) EU 3(a) .

43) EU 5 .

44) EU (13).

(13)

YZZ

(information meeting)

, .

⁴⁵⁾

.

⁴⁶⁾

,

.

⁴⁷⁾

EU ,

,

.

⁴⁸⁾

EU

.

⁴⁹⁾

(ZPO) ,

. , .

⁵⁰⁾

, § 251 subsection 1

(statement of claim) ADR

.

⁵¹⁾

(ZPO) 278

(court-administered mediation) , 1

45) EU 5(1) .

46) EU (25).

47) EU (25).

48) EU 5(2) .

49) EU (12).

51) European Parliament, id.; Linklters, op. cit., p.17.

(14)

YZ[

(ZPO) 278(2)

.

(ADR) .

(judicial conciliation)

⁵²⁾

(conciliation judge)

.

⁵³⁾

2000 (EGZPO) Section 15a

(mandatory mediation) .

,

.

, .

700 ,

, .

⁵⁴⁾

.

52) (conciliation) (conciliator)

(mediation)

. (mediator)

, , , ,

. European Commission, European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters- Germany

(http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ger_en.htm, 2016 1 21 ).

54) EGZPO Section 15(a)2 .

(15)

YZ\

ADR ,

. ,

( ) 10,000 ( 1000

) .

,

.

⁵⁵⁾

,

(CPR) ADR

. ADR .

⁵⁶⁾

( , , ,

, , , , ,

) ( ) .

⁵⁷⁾

(pre-action protocols) .

ADR .

(protocol practice direction) (

)

,

. ,

.

⁵⁸⁾

ADR ,

ADR

55) Id., p.67.

56) Id., p.15.

57) (Ministry of Justice) (http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procedures_fin/menus/p rotocol.htm) .

58) CPR 44.3(2).

(16)

YZ]

.

,

, ,

,

. ADR

,

(adverse cost awards) .

, ,

.

⁵⁹⁾

2013 10 , ,

ADR ADR,

ADR .

⁶⁰⁾

,

, 3

.

. .

, .

,

60) Id.

(17)

YZ^

.

⁶¹⁾

. EU

.

⁶²⁾

, ,

.

⁶³⁾

, .

,

64)

;

.

⁶⁵⁾

,

.

⁶⁶⁾

61) Court de Cassation-Chambre Mixed, 17 fébrier 2003, arrêt n°217P, Laurent Jaeger, Latham

& Watkins, Laurent Jaeger, Latham & Watkins, Commercial Mediation in France (http://www.cma p.fr/pdf/Intervention20%LJA%20%York%2015%20September%202006.pdf, 2015 11 19

), p. 2 .

62) EU (23).

63) EU 7(1) .

64) EU 7(1)(a) .

65) EU 7(1)(b) .

66) EU 7(2) .

(18)

YZ_

Section 4

.

, .

,

, .

.

⁶⁷⁾

. .

⁶⁸⁾

.

,

(mediation agreement) . ,

.

⁶⁹⁾

.

68) Id.

69) Rhys Cliff, “Introduction to Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Comparison between Arbitration and Mediation”, HILL DIKNSON (www.hilldickinson.com, 2015 11 20 ), p.8.

(19)

YZ`

,

.

⁷⁰⁾

7

,

. 10(b)

, (interests of justice)

· .

⁷¹⁾

. 2011

, .

, ,

131.14 1995 (1995 Law) 24

.

⁷²⁾

131.14 ,

. EU

, .

⁷³⁾

,

.

⁷⁴⁾

70) Id., pp.7-8.

72) Id., p.27.

73) Id.

74) Ordonnance n° 2011-1540, Art. 1. Section 1.

(20)

Y[W

EU , ,

.

⁷⁵⁾

, .

⁷⁶⁾

, , ,

.

⁷⁷⁾

(code of conduct) .

,

.

⁷⁸⁾

‘

’ .

⁷⁹⁾

75) EU (16).

76) EU (17).

77) EU (17).

78) EU 4 .

79) EU (17).

(21)

Y[X

Section 5 ( , )

,

. ,

, ,

, , (supervision) .

Section 6

(certified mediator) ,

. ,

2016 1 .

2011

.

1533 ,

, ,

. .

⁸⁰⁾

, 2009 1 1

2008 12 31 ,

(judiciary)

.

⁸¹⁾

80) European Parliament. op. cit., p.30.

81) Id.

(22)

Y[Y

, ,

. ,

82)

. (solicitor)

(barrister) .

⁸³⁾

EU

,

.

⁸⁴⁾

.

⁸⁵⁾

.

⁸⁶⁾

EU

.

⁸⁷⁾

.

⁸⁸⁾

82) Civil Mediation Council, Center for Effective Dispute Resolution, Chartered Institute of Arbitration .

84) EU 6(1) .

85) EU 6(1) .

86) EU (19).

87) EU (22).

88) EU :

2000 No 44/2001 ( I, Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in

(23)

Y[Z

(public notary)

, .

⁸⁹⁾

.

⁹⁰⁾

EU 6 1 2

.

⁹¹⁾

.

⁹²⁾

,

.

⁹³⁾

.

, .

⁹⁴⁾

civil and commercial matters, OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1. Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006

(OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.1) .)

2003 No. 2201/2003

( II, Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.1. Regulation (EC) No 2116/2004

(OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p.1) ). No 2201/2003

( II) .

, ,

. EU (20) - (21).

89) IP/04/1288.

90) EU 6(2) .

91) EU 6(3) .

92) EU 6(1) .

93) EU 6(4) .

(24)

Y[[

,

. (EGZPO) Section 15a

( )

.

⁹⁵⁾

,

, .

⁹⁶⁾

, .

. (Amstsgericht)

.

⁹⁷⁾

,

(Civil Procedure Amendment Rules) Schedule

2 . 78.24

(Court Practice Rule) 23 .

, 78.24

(Mediation Settlement Enforcement Order: MSEO)

. ,

.

⁹⁸⁾

95) (ZPO) Section 794(1)5.

96) European Parliament, op. cit., p.33.

97) (ZPO) Section 794(1) Section 796a, 796b . European Commission, op. cit.

(25)

Y[\

, 2011

, (extra

judicial mediation) 1441-4

. 2011

.

, 1534

EU

, ,

.

⁹⁹⁾

EU ,

.

¹⁰⁰⁾

.

99) Id., p.29.

100) EU 8 .

(26)

Y[]

, (German Civil Code: BGB) Section 204(1) No 4

. (BGB)

Section 203 Sentence 1 .

.

¹⁰¹⁾

,

. CPR ,

.

¹⁰²⁾

,

.

¹⁰³⁾

,

, ( )

.

¹⁰⁴⁾

101) 203 ( ) ,

. ,

. , “ADR, ”, 11 1 ,

2007 , , 305 , 19 .

103) Code of procédure civil, Art.131-11.

(27)

Y[^

EU ,

,

.

, (Rules of Professional Practice

for Lawyers) Section 1(3)

.

. 2012 .

§ 251 subsection 1 (statement of claim) ADR

.

¹⁰⁵⁾

, 1997 (CPR)

ADR . CPR

,

, ADR

.

¹⁰⁶⁾

2007 7 1 (Solicitors Code

105) Id., p.33; Linklters, op. cit., p.17.

(28)

Y[_

of Conduct)

. (standard of client care)

(Rule) 2.02(1)(b) , ,

. 3 ,

ADR ,

.

¹⁰⁷⁾

,

.

¹⁰⁸⁾

IV.

,

.

. EU

, 2008 EU

.

¹⁰⁹⁾

, , EU

. ,

,

107) GEMME, op. cit.

109) Id., p.6.

(29)

Y[`

,

( ) ( )

. ,

.

, ,

, .

¹¹⁰⁾

, ADR

. , ,

,

ADR

. (CPR)

ADR ,

ADR

ADR .

,

. EU ,

110) EU ,

, (

) ,

, ,

. Id., p.8, <Figure D. Top - Ranked, Most Effective Legislative Measure to Increase Mediation Use> .

(30)

Y\W

, .

,

.

, , ,

,

.

( ) ,

,

.

. ,

, ,

.

, ,

,

. 35

,

(31)

Y\X

168 ( )

.

¹¹¹⁾

111) , “ ”,

(2016.2.17.) , , 2016.

(32)

Y\Y

< >

, “ADR :

”, 13 9 , , 2009.

______, “ ADR ”,

29 , , 2009.

, “ADR, ”, 11 1 ,

, 2007.

______, “2012 ”, 16 2 ,

, 2013.

, “ ”,

(2016.2.17.) , , 2016.

< >

European Commission, Alternative Dispute Resolution - Germany

(http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ger_en.htm, 2015 12 1 ).

European Commission, European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters- Germany (http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ger_en.htm,

2016 1 21 ).

European Parliament, ‘Rebooting’ the Mediation Directive: Assessing The Limited Impact of Its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU (January, 2014).

(http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/493042/

IPOL-JURI_ET(2014)493042_EN.pdf, 2015 11 13 ).

Linklaters, Commercial mediation - a comparative review (2013)

(http://www.linklaters.com/Insights/Commercial-mediation-comparative-r eview-2013/Pages/Index.aspx, 2015 12 10 ).

Michel Kallipetis · Stephen Ruttle, “Better Dispute Resolution - the Development

(33)

Y\Z

and Practice of Mediation in the United Kingdom between 1995-2000”

in Jean - Claude Goldsmith, Gerald H. Pointon, Arnold Ingen-Housz (eds.), ADR in Business, KLUWER LAW International, 2006.

Philip Newman · Antonio Miguel Ferro Gatela Teixeira, “Legal Problems and opportunities for ADR in the European Union”, EuroExpert Symposium (Estoril/Portugal, 2003)

(http://www.euroexpert.org/fileadmin/euroexpert/documents/downloads/le gal_problems.pdf, 2015 12 5 ).

Rhys Cliff, “Introduction to Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Comparison between Arbitration and Mediation”, HILL DIKNSON

(www.hilldickinson.com, 2015 11 20 ).

UK Ministry of Justice, CPR - Pre-Action Protocols

(http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/menus/protocol.htm, 2016

3 ).

(34)

Y\[

< >

, , EU

. ,

, .

,

.

, ,

. ,

, ADR .

,

.

, , ,

,

.

( ) ,

,

.

(35)

Y\\

.

, , , ,

, .

, ,

.

, ,

,

. 35

,

168 ( )

.

(36)

Y\]

A comparative legal study on the laws implementing the EU Mediation Directive and its implications Focused on the

United Kingdom, Germany and France

112)

Yi, Lo-Ri*

The EU Mediation Directive of which the objective to facilitate access to dispute resolution and to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings has advanced the mediation discourse in the EU member countries in the process of implementation over the last years. It was supposed to be implemented by the member states into their laws until 21st May 2011. The article comparatively analyses the recent implementing legislation of the United Kingdom, Germany and France with the major elements of the EU Mediation Directive such as definition of mediation, court referrals to mediation, confidentiality of mediation, quality of mediation, cross-border recognition and enforcement of agreement as a result of mediation, limitation periods, obligation of lawyers to provide information, etc.

The comparative legal study has found the following legal implications. Firstly, having a definition provision of mediation in laws is very important as it shows the essential of mediation and also suggests the objective and method of mediation.

Secondly, providing mediation information and ensuring an procedural opportunity to consider the use of mediation to the parties in dispute may be effective measures to increase the access to mediation. In that sense, the role of courts and lawyers is important. Thirdly, the predictability of mediation is guaranteed by providing the confidentiality of mediation and enforceability of the agreement as a result of mediation. Fourthly, for the purpose of controling of quality of mediation, training and certification system and the code of conduct for mediators may be introduced.

Those policy options make it possible to guarantee the parties’autonomy in the process and mediators’ responsibility to proceed the fair and effective mediation.

*Associate Professor of Law Department, Keimyung University, Ph.D in Law.

(37)

Y\^

:

Fifthly, the legal effect of a mediated agreement is commonly recognized as a

contract in the countries subject to this study. If a mediated agreement has a legal

effect as a contract, the procedural system should be legally prepared to render

it enforceable. Lastly, an explicit legal basis stipulating that the limitation or

prescription period for any litigation should be extended during the period of mediation

process is needed for all types of mediation in implementation to ensure the sound

relationship between litigation and mediation in the arena of dispute resolution.

(38)