• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

457.309.02 Hydraulics and Laboratory .10 Turbulent flow in rough pipe(2) Prepared by Jin Hwan Hwang (2019.03.28)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "457.309.02 Hydraulics and Laboratory .10 Turbulent flow in rough pipe(2) Prepared by Jin Hwan Hwang (2019.03.28)"

Copied!
15
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Seoul National University

457.309.02 Hydraulics and

Laboratory

.10 Turbulent flow in rough pipe(2)

(2)

Seoul National University

Today’s objectives

§ Leaning how to determine the friction factors

§ Study on some empirical parameters for friction factors.

(3)

Seoul National University

6. Pipe friction factors

§ Since there is no exact solution for the pipe friction factors, determin ation of friction depends extensively on the experimental works.

§ Friction factor, must depends on the shear stress, mean velocity, pip e diameter, mean roughness height, fluid density and viscosity.

§ Dimensional analysis

§ We have 6 variables which includes density (mass), therefore, 3 rec urring variables. That means we can come up with three non-dimens ional number describe this system.

φ τ ( 0,V , d , e, ρ , µ ) = 0

ρ : Mass, V : Time, d: Length

(4)

Seoul National University

6. Pipe friction factors

§ Then

§ In the similar way,

π

1

⇒ φ

1

( ) τ0 π2 ⇒ φ2( ) e

π

3

⇒ φ

3

( ) µ

M

0

L

0

T

0

= φ

1

( ρ ,V , d, τ0) = ⎡⎣ ML−3⎤⎦a ⎡⎣ LT −1⎤⎦b[ ] L c ⎡⎣ ML−1T −2 ⎤⎦−1

a − 1 = 0, − 3a + b + c + 1 = 0, − b + 2 = 0 a = 1, b = 2, c = 0

π

1

= φ

1

ρ V

2

τ

0

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ = φ

1

τ

0

ρ V

2

⎝⎜

⎠⎟

π

2

= φ

2

Vd ρ µ

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ , φ

3

= f

3

⎛ e

⎝⎜ ⎞

⎠⎟

(5)

Seoul National University

6. Pipe friction factors

§ Therefore

If dynamically and geometrically two systems are same , then their friction factors are same (similarity).

τ

0

ρ V

2

= φ Vd ρ µ , e

d

⎝⎜

⎠⎟ = φ Re, e d

⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞

⎠⎟

τ

0

= ρV

2

φ Re, e d

⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞

⎠⎟ remember, τ

0

= f ρ V

2

8

⎝⎜

⎠⎟

Finally : f = φ Re, e d

⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞

⎠⎟

(6)

Seoul National University

6. Pipe friction factors

§ Blasius-Stanton diagram

Rec=2,100

f = 64 Re

Reynolds number increases but friction factor is constant.

Roughness height more important

Viscous sublayer decreases

(7)

Seoul National University

Example problem

§ Water at 100 F flows in a 3 inch pipe at a Reynolds number of 80,00 0. If the pipe is lined with uniform sand grains 0.006 inches in diamet er, how much head loss is to be expected in 1,000 ft of the pipe? Ho w much head loss would be expected if the pipe were smooth?

§ To get velocity, e

d = 0.006

3 = 0.002 and Re=80,000 f ≅ 0.021 (Use figure)

V = Re⋅ν

d = 80,000×0.739×10−5

3 /12 = 2.36 ft / sec

(8)

Seoul National University

Example problem

§ If flow is in a smooth pipe, then we can apply Blasius power relation ship

§ The head loss in the smooth pipe f = 0.316

Re0.25 = 0.0188

hL = f l d

V2

2gn = 0.01881000 3 /12

2.362

2× 32.2 = 6.5ft

(9)

Seoul National University

Moody Diagram

§ As we discussed before, the commercial pipe does not follow Nikura dse’s. In this case, we’d better use Moody diagram

(10)

Seoul National University

Moody Diagram

§ The relative roughness s hould be determined by t he following (if you don’t know well the roughness (but you know material)

(11)

Seoul National University

Example problem

§ Water at 100 F flows in a 3 inch pipe at a Reynolds number of 80,00 0. This is a commercial pipe with an equivalent sand grain roughnes s of 0.006 in. What head loss is to be expected in 1,000 ft of this pip e?

e

d = 0.006

3 = 0.002 and Re=80,000 f ≅ 0.0255 (Use Moody diagram)

V = Re⋅ν

d = 80,000× 0.739×10−5

3 /12 = 2.36 ft / sec hL = f l

d V2

2gn ≅ 0.02551000 3 /12

2.362

2 ×32.2 = 8.8 ft

(12)

Seoul National University

7. Pipe friction in noncircular pipes

§ How determines the friction factor and head loss in rectangular duct s? Or other conduits of noncircular form.

§ Hydraulic Radius

§ First calculate the hydraulic radius and determine the equivalent dia meter of the circular pipe (assume it).

§ Use this diameter for Moody diagram

§ In turbulent flow, it seems work but in laminar flow not applicable.

R

h

= P

A (P is wetted parameter, A is area)

d = 4 R

h

R

h

= π R

2

2 π R =

R

2 = d 4

⎝⎜

⎠⎟

(13)

Seoul National University

Example problem

§ Calculate the loss of head and the pressure drop when air at an abs olute pressure of 101.kPa and 15 C flows through 600 m of 450 mm by 300 mm smooth rectangular duct with a mean velocity of 3 m/s.

Rh = A

P = 0.45m × 0.30m

2 ×0.45m + 2×0.30 = 0.090 Re = Vdρ

µ =

V

( )

4Rh ρ

µ =

3m / s×

(

4 × 0.090m

)

×1.225kg/ m3

1.789×10−5 = 73,950 f ≅ 0.019 (From the Moody diagram for smooth diagram)

hL = f l d

V2

2gn = f l 4Rh

V2

2gn =14.5m

(14)

Seoul National University

8. Empirical Formulas

§ Hazen-Williams

Permitting the capacity of pipes to convey water

§ Manning

Application to open channel, but also used for pipe flow.

For a given pipe

(U.S. Customary units) V = 1.49

n Rh2/3S1/2

(SI units) V = 1

n Rh2/3S1/2 f = 185n2

d1/3 where n is roughness coefficient for manning

(15)

Seoul National University

8. Empirical Formulas

§ Manning’s

– There is no Reynolds number effect so the formula must be used only in the wholly rough flow zone where its horizontal slope c an accurately match Darcy-Weisbach values provided the proper n-value is selected.

– The relative roughness effect is correct in the sense that, for a gi ven roughness, a larger pipe will have a smaller factor.

– In general sense, because the formula is valid only for rough pi pes, the rougher the pipe, the more likely the Manning formula w ill apply.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait