• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PDF Stress Strain in Anisotropic Material - Seoul National University

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "PDF Stress Strain in Anisotropic Material - Seoul National University"

Copied!
26
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

M2794.007700 Smart Materials and Design

Stress – Strain in Anisotropic Material

April 11, 2017

Prof. Sung-Hoon Ahn (安成勳)

(2)

STRESS-STRAIN IN

ANISOTROPIC MATERIAL

2

(3)

General anisotropic materials

▪ Recap - isotropic stress, strain

- generalized Hooke’s law ; 81 elements

▪ Special material

 Work per unit volume

j i ij i

i  

C

2 1 2

W 1

i Cijj

j ij i

i

WC

ij j

i

W C

2

 also 

j i ij  2C

W 1 j iji

 W C

ji

ij C

C

ji

ij S

S

(4)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Orthotropic material

▪ 3 mutually perpendicular planes of material symmetry

4

3 2 1 3 2 1

66 55

44 33

23 13

23 22

12

13 12

11

3 2 1 3 2 1

C C

C C

C C

C C

C

C C

C

9 elements

3 2

1

3

2

(5)

Transversely isotropic material

- One of principal plane is isotropic

3 2 1 3 2 1

55 23

22 22

23 12

23 22

12

12 12

11

3 2 1 3 2 1

C C

2 C C

C C

C

C C

C

C C

C

2 1

3

(6)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Isotropic material

6

3 2 1 3 2 1

12 11

12 11

12 11

11 12

12

12 11

12

12 12

11

3 2 1 3 2 1

2 C C

2 C C

2 C C

C C

C

C C

C

C C

C

2 constants

3 2 1 3 2 1

66 55

23 22

22 23

12

23 22

12

12 12

11

3 2 1 3 2 1

C C

2 C C

C C

C

C C

C

C C

C

12 31 23

τ τ τ

(7)

More on the orthotropic material

▪ No interaction between

▪ No interaction between

▪ No interaction between

3 2 1 3

2

1

,  ,  &  ,  , 

3 2 1 3

2

1

,   &  ,  , 

2 1

&

eg.

plane different

in '

&

'

 s s

Under plane stress

 

1 13

 

2

0

23

3

      

When stresses in thickness direction (3) assumed to zero eg. Thin plate, (pressure vessel)

Normal component very small

2

(8)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

More on the orthotropic material

8

3 2 1 3 2 1

66 55

44 33

23 13

23 22

12

13 12

11

3 2 1

C C

C C

C C

C C

C

C C

C

0 0 0

3 66 3

2 1

33 2 23 33

1 13 3

3 33 2

23 1

13

3 23 2

22 1

12 2

3 13 2

12 1

11 1

C

0

C C C

C C C

C 0

C C

C

C C

C

 

2 22 1

12 2

33 23 23 22

1 33

23 13 12

2

2 12 1

11 2

33 13 23 12

1 33

13 13 11

1

Q C Q

C C C

C C C C

Q C Q

C C C

C C C C

















(9)

More on the orthotropic material

       

S 0

0

0 0

3 2 1

66 22

21

12 11

3 2 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q Q

Q

Q Q

eq.1

1

2 fiber

direction

(10)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

How to relate S ij to engineering constants

▪ Orthotropic (general case)

10

Test 1.

1

1 1 12 1

12 2

1 1 1

E E

 

 

2

Test 2.

Test 3.

2 2 21 2

21 1

2 2 2

E E

 

 

12 12

12

G 

 

1

1

E1

1 2

fiber direction

(11)

▪ In matrix form

How to relate S ij to engineering constants

1 11 12 1

2 21 22 2

3 66 3

12

1 1

1 21

2

2 2

3

12

0 0

0 0

1

E E

1

E E

1 G S S

S S

S

 

 

 

 

     

      

     

     

     

 

  

   

   

    

   

 

 

 

2 21 1

12

E E

21 12

2 22

21 12

1 11

1 1 Q E Q E

(12)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of stress & strain

▪ Two coordinate systems

Loading axes (x,y)

Principal material axes (1,2)

12

2 1

x y

    

 

 

 

 

s y x

T

3 2

1

 

















s y x

T

2 1 2

1

3 2 1

 





2 2 2

2

2 2

2 2

n m mn mn

mn m

n

mn n

m T

     





2 2 2

2

2 2

1 2

2

n m mn mn

mn m

n

mn n

m T

T

 sin

cos

n m

(13)

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ recap – simplification of material constants General anisotropic (81)

orthotropic (9)

Transverseley isotropic (5)

Plane stress (4)

isotropic (2) – (E,υ)

   

231 213

3 0

   

66 12 22

11,Q ,Q ,Q Q

(14)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ In simple form

14

  

x,y

     Q

x,y

x,y

To obtain [Q]

x,y

in loading axes (off-axes) using [Q]

1,2

in material

axes & transformation

     

     

      x y y

x

, 2

, 1 1

-

2 , 1 2

, 1 1

-

2 , 1 -1

,

T Q

T

Q T

T

     

     

    

x y

y x

, 2

, 1

2 , 1 2

, 1 2

, 1

, 2

, 1

T Q T

Known value

   

     

 

sin , cos T

, T

G , ,

E , E Q

1 -

12 12

2 2 1

, 1

f

f

(15)

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ Actual matrix form

▪ Stress - Strain

Eg. (3.31) & (3.35) are for ten/comp along principal axes – no shear strain Similarly, under pure shear, τ3, along principal axes(1,2), only a pure strain γ3

No coupling between normal stresses & shear deformation and between shear stress

& normal strains

Not true if along arbitrary axes(x,y)

) 63 . 3 ( .

 

 

 

 

 

 

y x ys

yy yx

xs xy

xx y

x

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q e

i

  

x,y

     Q

x,y

x,y

Match with previous page’s eq

(16)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ rewrite

16

) 64 . 3 ( 2

2 1 2 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s y x

ss sy

sx

ys yy

yx

xs xy

xx

s y x

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 2 1

66 22

12

12 11

1

3 2 1 1

s y

Q 0

0

0 Q

Q

0 Q

Q

T T

x

on axis

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s y x

T T

T

2 2Q 1

0 0

0 Q

Q

0 Q

Q

2 2Q 1

0 0

0 Q

Q

0 Q

Q

66 22

21

12 11

1

3 2 1

66 22

21

12 11

1

to use eq.60. (3.65)

B

(17)

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ Result

    T

2 0

0

0 0 T

2 2 2

66 22

12

12 11

1 -

 

 

 

 

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q

Q Q

Q

ss sy

sx

ys yy

yx

xs xy

xx

Different from [Q]

1,2

Matrix

 

 

 

 

3 3

3 3

3 3

66 3

3 12

3 3

22 3 11

3

66 2 2 12

4 4

22 2 2 11

2 2

66 2 2 12

2 2 22

4 11

4

66 2 2 12

2 2 22

4 11

4

) (

2 )

(

) (

2 )

(

4 )

(

4 2

4 2

Q mn n

m Q

mn n

m nQ

m Q

mn Q

Q n m mn

Q n m mn

Q mn nQ

m Q

Q n m Q

n m

Q n m Q

n m Q

Q n m Q

n m Q

m Q

n Q

Q n m Q

n m Q

n Q

m Q

xs xy yy xx

A=B

(18)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ Strain - Stress

18

  

x,y

     S

x,y

x,y

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s y x

ss sy

sx

ys yy

yx

sx xy

xx x

S S

S

S S

S

S S

S

2 1 2

1 2

1 2

1

s

y

Similarly

     

   

           

x y

y x y

x y

x

, 1

2 , 1 2

, 1 1

2 , 1 1

, ,

,

T S T

S T

T S

C
(19)

Transformation of elastic parameters

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 2 1

66 22

12

12 11

1

3 2 1 1

s y

2 0 1

0

0 S

S

0 S

S

2 1

2

1 

S T

T

x

) 61 . 3

( (3.33)

11 12

 

1

12 22

66

S S 0

S S 0

0 0 1

2

x y s

T T

S

 

   

   

 

      

     

 

 

(3.57)

C=D D

  S S  

S S

S

xx xy xs

 

 

 

 

 

12

11

0

(20)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ Result

20

 

 

 

 

66 2 2 2

12 2 2 22

2 2 11

2 2

66 3

3 12

3 3

22 3

11 3

66 3

3 12

3 3

22 3 11

3

66 2 2 12

4 4

22 2 2 11

2 2

66 2 2 12

2 2 22

4 11

4

66 2 2 12

2 2 22

4 11

4

) (

8 4

4

) (

) (

2 2

2

) (

) (

2 2

2

) (

2 2

S n

m S

n m S

n m S

n m S

S mn n

m S

mn n

m nS

m S

mn S

S n m mn

S n m mn

S mn nS

m S

S n m S

n m

S n m S

n m S

S n m S

n m S

m S

n S

S n m S

n m S

n S

m S

ss ys xs xy yy xx

(21)

Transformation of elastic parameters

  S

x,y

in terms of engineerin g constant

“ shear coupling coefficient”

shear strain





















 





s y x

xy y

ys x

xs

xy sy xy

xy yx sx

x

G E

n E

n

G n G

n

 

1 E

1 E

E E

1

y x

y

s y

x s

nxs

 

Normal loading

Shear strain

) 77 . 3 . (eq

(22)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Transformation of elastic parameters

▪ Micromechanics

Volume

Mass

22

E E V V S A

f

Cij f , m,f ,m, f , m, ,

v m

f V V

V

V   

Volume

Volume fraction

1 , ,

v m

f

i i

V V

V

v m f V i

V V

How to get ?

1 ,

0

when Vv Vf Vm Vv

void,

Vm

matrix, Vf

fiber,

m m f

f

m m f

f

m m f

f

v v

m f

V V

V V V

V V

M

V V

M

M M

M M

M

 0

(23)

Transformation of elastic parameters

Representative elements for elastic constants

Longitudinal Young’s modulus

Longitudinal (ROM)

Transverse (IROM)

L

L

L

Af

Am L

L L

Flip

Lf

F1

m f m

f f m

m f

A A A F A

A A F

A F A

F A

F

F F

F

1 1

(24)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Rule of mixture

Transverse Young’s modulus

24

1 1 1

1 1 1

f f f

m m m

E E

 

 

 

 

m m f

f

m m m f

f f

V E V

E E

V E V

E E

1 1

1

1 1 1

1 1

1

 

ROM

L ∆L

m m F2

L ΔL

A E

A F

2

2 2 2

2

2

2Lmεm2 Lf f

ΔL

(25)

Rule of mixture

(IROM-continued)

1 IROM

) Assume

(

,

2

2 2

2

2 2 2

2 2

2

2 2

2

2 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

f f m

m

f f f m

m m

m f

f f f

m m m

f f m

m

E V E

V E

E V σ E

V σ E

E σ E

σ

L L L

E L E





 



 

 

out hand

, ,

, 23 12 23

12 G   

G

Halpin-Tsai

- Semi empirical model

E

ROM

Test data

(26)

© Sung-Hoon Ahn

Rule of mixture

26

psi E

V

psi E

psi E

f m

f

6

6 6

1

6 6

10 16

. 18

) 4 . 0 ( 10 4

. 0 ) 6 . 0 ( 10 30

6 . 0

10 4

. 0

10 30

psi E

E

6 2

6 6

2

10 98

. 0

10 4

. 0

4 . 0 10

30 6 . 0 1

 

 

What about particulate composites

ROM, IROM 1)

2)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait