• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Structure and Properties of Polymeric Materials

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Structure and Properties of Polymeric Materials"

Copied!
26
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Chapter 6

Crystalline State

(2)

Contents

‰

Melting

‰

Crystal structure

‰

Semicrystalline structure

ƒ

Models

ƒ

Lamella & Spherulite

‰

Crystallinity

‰

Crystallization

‰

Lamella re-entry

‰

Melting point

‰

Annealing

(3)

1. Melting

‰

semicrystalline = crystal + amorphous region

‰

melting = fusion of crystals

‰

Melting is a (true) 1st-order phase transition

(dG/dP)T = V (dG/dT)P = S

(d(G/T)/d(1/T)) = H

9 V, S, H are discontinuous at Tm

‰

T

m

measurement

ƒ

Dilatometry (V) Fig 6.2

» on heating

Specific volume

Temperature

semiXtalline amorphous

(4)

Melting (cont’d)

‰

T

m

measurement (cont’d)

ƒ

DSC (H)

» on heating

» crystallinity p244

endo

Tg Tcc Tm Temp exo

ΔHf ΔHc

Fig6.3 p244 Fig8.10 p369

Tmc

(5)

Melting (cont’d)

‰

T

m

measurement (cont’d)

ƒ

IR, microscopy, X-ray

» conventional ~ snapshot ~ indirect and not popular

» real-time ~ measurement possible

(6)

2. Crystal Chemistry

‰

(semi)crystalline = crystal + amorphous

‰

crystal = regular array of atoms

‰

unit cell = smallest volume of repeating structure

ƒ

crystal system ~ shape of unit cell

ƒ

Orthorhombic is popular for polymers

b a

c

(7)

Crystal Chemistry (cont’d)

‰

observing crystal structure

ƒ

X-Ray (WAXD) Fig 6.4 & 6.5(b)

ƒ

ED, IR, Raman

‰

Miller index

See the supplement

ƒ

The plane passing (a/h, b/k, c/l) is (h k l ) plane.
(8)

‰

crystal(lographic) structure = unit cell structure

‰

Chains are of their preferred conformation given by RIS model.

Å minimum energy p256 #2

ƒ

Polyethylene; tttttt…; planar zigzag

» Fig 6.5

ƒ

Isotactic polypropylene; tgtg…; 31 helix

» Fig 6.6, 6.7

3. Crystallographic Structure of Polymers

(9)

Crystal Structure (cont’d)

ƒ

Polyoxymethylene; g+g+g+g+… or g-g-g-g-…; 21 helix

ƒ

Nylon; hydrogen bonding; planar zigzag Fig 6.8

‰

orthogonal popular

Å packing p256 #3

‰

anisotropic

Å packing p256 #3

‰

polymorphic

Table 6.2
(10)

4. Semicrystalline State

‰

Fringed micelle model

Fig 6.9

ƒ

intuitive

ƒ

A chain passes through crystallites.

ƒ

2-phase morphology (crystallites + amorphous)

‰

Folded chain model

Fig 6.10

ƒ

Single crystal lamella from dilute solution Fig 6.5(a)

ƒ

Chains are perpendicular to lamella by ED

ƒ

Chains got to be folded

ƒ

3-phase morphology

(lamellae + interface + amorphous)

ƒ

Lamella re-entry – adjacent or switchboard?
(11)

Lamella 1

‰

Single crystal from solution Part of spherulite from melt

‰

Shape depends on crystal structure

Fig 6.11 vs 6.12

Polyethylene (orthorhombic)

Polyoxymethylene

(hexagonal) Poly-4-methyl-1-pentene (tetragonal)

(12)

Lamella 2

‰

Growth

ƒ

on [110] fold plane

ƒ

on [110] and [100] plane

Fig 6.10

(13)

Lamella 3

‰

Multi-layer lamella

Fig 6.11 & 6.12

ƒ

Screw dislocation

‰

Hollow Pyramid

ƒ

lattice mismatch
(14)

5. Spherulite

‰

from melt

‰

Melt crystallized

ƒ

at high temperature – axialite (sheaf-like)

ƒ

at low temperature – spherulite (dendritic growth)

‰

Axialite to spherulite

Fig 6.19
(15)

Spherulite (cont’d)

‰

Growing of lamellae from the center

Fig 6.17

ƒ under POM ~ Maltese cross pattern Fig 6.13

(16)

Banded spherulite

‰

lamellar twisting

Fig 6.22

(17)

Crystallinity

‰

Crystallinity = % crystallinity = degree of crystallinity

ƒ

Xc = volume of Xtal / total volume = 30 ~ 70% for polymers

‰

X

c

depends on

ƒ

repeat unit structure Xc(PE) > Xc(PEster)

ƒ

cooling rate

‰

Measuring X

c

ƒ

Volumetric ~ density gradient column

ƒ

Crystallographic ~ WAX

ƒ

Thermal ~ DSC

ƒ

Spectroscopic ~ IR

¾100% crystal data Å unit cell structure, Tm depression

¾100% amorphous data Å quenched sample, extrapolation from melt

Fig 6.24

(18)

6. Crystallization

‰

Nucleation

ƒ

at T < Tm

ƒ

thermodynamic control

ƒ

faster at large ΔT (= Tm - T)

‰

Growth

ƒ

at T > Tg

ƒ

diffusion (kinetic) control

ƒ

faster at high T

higher chain mobility and lower viscosity at large T Tg

‰

Fig 6.27 (T or T-T

g

)

‰

Measurement of Xtallization rate

ƒ

dilatometry Fig 6.25

ƒ

microscopy Fig 6.26

Temperature Rate

(19)

Theories of Crystallization Kinetics

‰

Avrami equation ~ time-dependency

ƒ

px = exp(-E) Ex / x!

» probability of P crossed by x fronts out of E fronts

ƒ

p0 = exp(-E) = 1 – Xt = exp(- Z t n) Eqn (6.16)

ƒ

athermal (predetermined) N & G; n = 3

ƒ

thermal (sporadic) N & G; n = 4

ƒ

diffusion (of impurity) controlled; n = 2.5

Table 6.4, 6.5

(20)

Theories of Crystallization Kinetics

‰

Keith-Padden theory ~ structure

Fig 6.28

ƒ

δ = D / G (Diffusion of impurity / radial Growth)

δ ~ lateral dimension of lamellae

» small δ ~ coarse spherulites

‰

Lauritzen-Hopffmann theory ~ mechanism

Fig 6.30-31

ƒ

three regimes of Xtallization Fig 6.32

» Regime I ~ at high T, g >> i

‹ axialite, adjacent reentry

» Regime II ~ at lower T, g < i, spherulite

» Regime III ~ at even lower T, g ~ i

‹ random, switchboard

i

Hoffman

(21)

Crystallization and Property

‰

Degree of crystallinity

ƒ

modulus, yield strength

‰

Spherulite size

ƒ

clarity, toughness

‰

Processing condition

Temperature Rate

(22)

7. Lamella Re-entry

‰

2 models

ƒ

Adjacent Æ folding

» IR of mixed crystal

ƒ

Switchboard Æ fringed micelle

» etching experiment

‰

4 models

ƒ

Adjacent with superfolding Fig 6.34(a)

ƒ

Adjacent without superfolding Fig 6.34(c)

ƒ

Mixed or partial adjacent Fig 6.34(b)

ƒ

Switchboard Fig 6.34(d)
(23)

Lamella Re-entry 2

‰

(sol’n grown) single crystal lamellae

ƒ

super-folding for intermediate MW

» <r2>1/2 M0.1 by SANS

» 75% adjacent

ƒ

Mixed or partial non-adjacent for high MW

‰

Melt crystallized lamellae

ƒ

Switchboard + some folding

ƒ

<r2>1/2M0.5 by SANS

ƒ

3 phases

» crystal + interface + amorphous

Fig 6.36

(24)

8. Melting Temperature

‰

ΔG

f

= ΔH

f

–TΔS

f

‰

At pure state, T

m0

= ΔH

f0

/ ΔS

f0

‰

Equilibrium melting temperature, T

m0

ƒ

for infinitely thick crystal (lamella)

ƒ

for infinitely high molecular weight

‰

Melting point depression by impurity

ƒ

Copolymer

ƒ

Molecular weight

ƒ

2nd component (low MW or other polymer)

‰

T

m0

measured by Hoffman-Weeks plot

Fig 6.40

ƒ isothermal crystallization at various Tc

(25)

9. Structure and T

m

‰

T

m0

= ΔH

f0

/ ΔS

f0

‰

ΔH

f

~ interchain interaction ΔS

f

~ chain flexibility

‰

Higher for more regular, rigid, closely-packed, and stronger interaction

(6.54-56) p305-306

‰

T

g

and T

m

are correlated.

T

g

= (0.5 ~ 0.8) T

m

(in K)

(26)

Annealing

‰

At T

g

< T < T

m

‰

Due to

ƒ

activated internal mobility

ƒ

promoted higher stability

‰

Results

ƒ

Growth of crystalline region Æ increase in crystallinity

ƒ

Increase in crystal perfection Æ increase in Tm

ƒ

More stable structure Æ lamella thickening

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Al and Cu doping resulted in lowered crystal size (D), average surface roughness, and transmittance, as well as heightened lattice strain () and dislocation density (ρ)..

Al and Cu doping resulted in lowered crystal size (D), average surface roughness, and transmittance, as well as heightened lattice strain () and dislocation density (ρ)..

M., Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Efficacy On New Mixed Ligand Complexes Based from Azo Dye of 8-Hydroxy Quinoline as A Primary Ligand and

The higher photocatalytic activity of N-doped TiO2 than undoped TiO2 under UV and visible irradiation may be due to the substitution of nitrogen for oxygen atoms in the crystal

From the results of the data explanation on the improvement of concept mastery and problem-solving skills in crystal structure material, it is proven that learning process using e-MMA

and Rojo, T., Hydrothermal synthesis of a new layered inor- ganic-organic hybrid cobaltII phosphite: C2H10N2[Co3HPO34]: Crystal structure and spectroscopic and magnetic properties..

Chemical and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Waterborne Polyurethane Dispersion Derived from Jatropha Oil ABSTRACT Nowadays, there is a significant trend away from solvent-based

61 Table 1: Summary of the glass transition temperature Tg, crystallization temperature Tx1, Tx2, and supercooled temperature region ∆Tx for the melt-spun ribbons and as-cast rod 2 mm