• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

U.S. Renewable Energy Strategy Since WSSD

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "U.S. Renewable Energy Strategy Since WSSD"

Copied!
33
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

U.S. Renewable Energy Strategy Since WSSD

A Tale of State and City Policy

U.S. Renewable Energy U.S. Renewable Energy

Strategy Since WSSD Strategy Since WSSD

A Tale of State and City Policy A Tale of State and City Policy

John Byrne John Byrne

Presentation to the Presentation to the

International Workshop on International Workshop on

National Renewable Energy Strategy National Renewable Energy Strategy

Since WSSD Since WSSD

Korea Energy Economics Institute Korea Energy Economics Institute

January 16, 2004 January 16, 2004

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(2)

Global Trends in Energy Use, 1990-2001 Global Trends in Energy Use, 1990-2001

에너지 에너지 사용의 사용의 세계적 세계적 추이 추이

00 55 1010 1515 2020 2525

WindWind Solar PV Solar

PV

GeothermalGeothermal HydroHydro OilOil Natural Gas Natural

Gas

NuclearNuclear CoalCoal

Source: Worldwatch InstituteSource: Worldwatch Institute

Annual Rate of Growth (%)Annual Rate of Growth (%)

22.2 22.2

15.915.9

4.34.3

1.91.9 1.81.8 1.61.6

0.60.6 0.00.0

(3)

World Commercial Energy Supply by Fuel (Mtoe)

세계세계 연료별연료별 에너지에너지 공급공급

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(4)

U.S. Energy Supply by Fuel (

U.S. Energy Supply by Fuel ( Mtoe Mtoe ) )

미국의미국의 연료별연료별 에너지에너지 공급공급

00 0 2020 20 4040 40 6060 60 8080 80 100100 100 120120 120 140140 140 160160 160

19701970

1970 197319731973 197619761976 197919791979 198219821982 198519851985 198819881988 199119911991 199419941994 199719971997 200020002000 Coal Oil Gas Electricity

Coal Oil Gas Electricity Heat Renewables Heat Renewables

(5)

Trends in US Wind Energy Trends in US Wind Energy

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(6)

Cumulative U.S. Installed

Photovoltaic Electricity Generating Capacity Cumulative U.S. Installed

Photovoltaic Electricity Generating Capacity

00 2020 4040 6060 8080 100100 120120 140140 160160

MegaWatts(Peak)MegaWatts(Peak)

19801980 19821982 19841984 19861986 19881988 19901990 19921992 19941994 19961996 19981998 20002000 Data Source: Strategies Unlimited

Data Source: Strategies Unlimited

Centralized Power

Centralized Power Distributed GenerationDistributed Generation

(7)

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell

at the WSSD (Sept. 4, 2002) U.S. Secretary of State

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell

Colin Powell

at the WSSD (Sept. 4, 2002) at the WSSD (Sept. 4, 2002)

U.S.

U.S. … … “ “ dedicated dedicated ” ” to to “ “ encourage encourage ” ” the use of renewable energy

the use of renewable energy

(U.S. Department of State, 2002:

(U.S. Department of State, 2002: www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2002/13235pf.htm)www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2002/13235pf.htm)

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(8)

U.S. R esponses to the WSSD U.S.

U.S. R R esponses to the esponses to the WSSD WSSD

9 9 Launch Launch Clean Energy Initiative: Powering Clean Energy Initiative: Powering Sustainable Development from Village to Sustainable Development from Village to

Metropolis Metropolis

9 9 Initial federal commitment Initial federal commitment $ 43 million $ 43 million 9 9 Expected private sector Expected private sector

leverage

leverage $400 million $400 million 9 9 Participate in GVEP Participate in GVEP

9 9 No specific action on U.S. use of renewables No specific action on U.S. use of renewables

(9)

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

Net Metering Policies by State in the U.S.

Net Metering Policies by State in the U.S.

ME: 100 kW ME: 100 kW

OK: 100 kW and 25,000 kWh OK: 100 kW and 25,000 kWh

NJ: 100kW NJ: 100kW

**

40 kW 40 kW

**

**

**

MD: 80 kW MD: 80 kW

CT: No limit CT: No limit RI: 25 kW RI: 25 kW

MA: 60 kW MA: 60 kW NH: 25 kW

NH: 25 kW

No limit No limit

10 kW 10 kW

10 kW 10 kW

40kW40kW 20 kW 20 kW No limit No limit

1,000 kW 1,000 kW

10 kW 10 kW

50 kW 50 kW 10 kW

10 kW 100 kW

100 kW 10 kW

10 kW 25 kW

25 kW 25 kW 25 kW

100 kW 100 kW

50 kW

50 kW 100 kW100 kW

37 states 37 states

have adopted have adopted Net Metering Net Metering

GA: 10 kW (res.); 100 kW (comm.) GA: 10 kW (res.); 100 kW (comm.)

** 25 kW

25 kW

AR: 25 kW (res.); 100 kW (comm. or AR: 25 kW (res.); 100 kW (comm. or agag.).)

HI: 10 kW HI: 10 kW

** 25 kW

25 kW

**

**

IN: 1,000 kWh/month IN: 1,000 kWh/month

VT: 15 kW, 100 kW for anaerobic digesters VT: 15 kW, 100 kW for anaerobic digesters VA: 10 kW (res.);25 kW (comm.)

VA: 10 kW (res.);25 kW (comm.) KY: 10 kW (res.); 25 kW (comm.) KY: 10 kW (res.); 25 kW (comm.)

미국의미국의 실전력계량기실전력계량기 시행시행 주주

Source: UCSUSA, 2003

(10)

Selected State Public Benefit Charges Selected State Public Benefit Charges

States

States Public Benefits Charges

$1.4 billion over 4 yrs. For efficiency and conservation projects and renewables development ($359 million/yr.

$1.4 billion over 4 yrs. For efficiency and conservation projects and renewables development ($359 million/yr.

$1.09 billion over 10 yrs. For conservation and renewables ($109 million/yr.

$1.09 billion over 10 yrs. For conservation and renewables ($109 million/yr.

$750 million over 5 yrs. To support conservation and efficiency projects and selected renewables ($150 million/yr.

$750 million over 5 yrs. To support conservation and efficiency projects and selected renewables ($150 million/yr.

$1 billion over 8 yrs. For energy efficiency and renewables ($125 million/yr.

$1 billion over 8 yrs. For energy efficiency and renewables ($125 million/yr.

California California Connecticut Connecticut

Massachusetts Massachusetts

New Jersey New Jersey

4 300억원 /)`

4 300억원 /)`

1 300억원 /)

1 800억원 /)

1 500억원 /)

공공공공 효용효용 부과금제도부과금제도

Note: 31 states have adopted Public Benefits Charges (typical range is 0.1 ~ 0.3¢/kWh).

(11)

State Renewable Portfolio Standards in the U.S.

State Renewable Portfolio Standards in the U.S.

MN: 4.8% by 2012 MN: 4.8% by 2012

NV: 15%

NV: 15%

by 2013 by 2013

TX: 2.2% by 2009 TX: 2.2% by 2009

NJ: NJ: 6.5%6.5%by 2012by 2012 CT: 13% by 2009 CT: 13% by 2009 MA: 4% by 2009 MA: 4% by 2009 ME:

ME: 30%

30% by 2000 by 2000

NM: 10%

NM: 10%

by 2011 by 2011 CA:

CA: 20% 20% by 2017 by 2017

HI: 9% by 2010 HI: 9% by 2010 (voluntary) (voluntary)

Sources: US EPA, 2003;

Sources: US EPA, 2003;

UCS, 2003 UCS, 2003

15 states with legislation 15 states with legislation (includes 2 with voluntary (includes 2 with voluntary standards)

standards)

15 states with pending 15 states with pending

legislation legislation

미국미국 각각 주별주별 재생가능재생가능 에너지에너지 의무의무 도입제도도입제도

NY: NY: 25%

25% by 2013 by 2013

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy 25 states have initiated Climate Change Action Plans and 19 have

25 states have initiated Climate Change Action Plans and 19 have completed them.completed them.

(12)

State Funds for Renewables State Funds for Renewables

주별주별 재생가능재생가능 에너지에너지 지원지원 기금기금

Source: UCS, 2003

Cumulative 1998

Cumulative 1998--20122012

$127

$127 milmil

RI: $10 m RI: $10 m MA: $383 m MA: $383 m CT: $338 m CT: $338 m NJ: $279 m NJ: $279 m

$220 m

$220 m

$55 m

$55 m

$22 m

$22 m

$111 m

$111 m

$2,048 m

$2,048 m

$40 m

$40 m

$95 m

$95 m

$10 m

$10 m

$234 m

$234 m

Total Renewables Total Renewables

Expenditures by Expenditures by

14 States = $4.0 billion 14 States = $4.0 billion (1998

(1998--2012)2012) (4(4 88천억원천억원))

(13)

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

Renewables from State Standards and Funds in the U.S.

Renewables from State Standards and Funds in the U.S.

Source: UCS, 2003

00 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 14,000 16,000 16,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 20,000 22,000 22,000

20002000 20022002 20042004 20062006 20082008 20102010 20122012 MegawattsMegawatts

13,280 MW new renewables 7,460 MW existing renewables

*Includes Illinois, Montana, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Rhode Islan*Includes Illinois, Montana, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.d.

Other*

Other*

California California

Nevada Nevada

Texas Texas IA & WI IA & WI

New Jersey New Jersey Connecticut Connecticut Massachusetts Massachusetts

Maine Maine

Minnesota Minnesota CO2 reduction equivalent to

* 1.7 billion more trees

* 5.7 million fewer cars

AZ & NM AZ & NM New York New York

의무의무 도입제도와도입제도와 지원기금을지원기금을 통한통한 재생가능재생가능 에너지에너지 발전발전 전망전망

(14)

US leader in solar US leader in solar

technologies for urban use technologies for urban use

Service to 1.3 million Service to 1.3 million

Service area: 6,000 km Service area: 6,000 km

22

Peak demand: ~ 2,800 MW Peak demand: ~ 2,800 MW

Annual electricity revenues:

Annual electricity revenues:

$1.5 billion

$1.5 billion

Annual electric use:

Annual electric use:

9,300 9,300 GWhGWh

Residential:

Residential: 46% 46%

Industrial:

Industrial: 54% 54%

Sacramento Sacramento

새크라멘토

새크라멘토

(15)

Program Highlights Program Highlights

‘GreenergyGreenergy 20,000 subscribers (pay additional $6/ month 20,000 subscribers (pay additional $6/ month for 100% renewables, $3/ month for 50/50 renewables/

for 100% renewables, $3/ month for 50/50 renewables/

conventional supply) conventional supply)

주요 주요 정책 정책 프로그램 프로그램

‘PV PioneersPV Pioneers’ Assistance for residential PV: Assistance for residential PV:

10 MW connected to grid, 3,100 homes served 10 MW connected to grid, 3,100 homes served

Sacramento ShadeSacramento Shade (312,000 free trees planted to reduce (312,000 free trees planted to reduce participant residential cooling costs by 40%

participant residential cooling costs by 40%

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (PV(PV-powered)-powered) Wind Power

Wind Power Purchase of 17 wind turbines providing Purchase of 17 wind turbines providing

~ 10 MW of clean energy

~ 10 MW of clean energy

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(16)

Results of Sacramento

Results of Sacramento ’ ’ s s ‘ ‘ Soft Path Soft Path ’ ’

세크라멘토의

세크라멘토의

‘ ‘

연성에너지연성에너지 경로경로

’ ’

결과결과

Peak load reduced by 372 MW (12 percent) Peak load reduced by 372 MW (12 percent)

Annual consumption reduced by 563

Annual consumption reduced by 563 GWhGWh ($43 million in bill savings to customers) ($43 million in bill savings to customers)

Total regional output increased by $124 million Total regional output increased by $124 million

Wages increased by $22 million Wages increased by $22 million

Carbon dioxide emissions decreased by Carbon dioxide emissions decreased by

265,000 tons 265,000 tons

(17)

Sacramento’s ‘Soft Energy Path’

Sacramento

Sacramento ’ ’ s s ‘ ‘ Soft Energy Path Soft Energy Path ’ ’

Residential Rooftops Residential Rooftops

세크라멘토의

세크라멘토의 연성연성 에너지에너지 경로경로

Community Sites (Zoo) Community Sites (Zoo)

PV Shading & Vehicle Charging

PV Shading & Vehicle Charging 17 City-Owned Wind Turbines17 City-Owned Wind Turbines

(18)

Population: 777,000 people Population: 777,000 people

Area: 122

Area: 122 kmkm22

Annual electric use: 5,235

Annual electric use: 5,235 GWhGWh Commercial/Industrial:

Commercial/Industrial: 60 %60 % Residential:

Residential: 27 %27 % Other:

Other: 13 %13 %

From 1994

From 1994-2000 electricity -2000 electricity consumption grew

consumption grew 9%9%

San Francisco San Francisco

샌프란시스코 샌프란시스코

(19)

Renewable Energy Policy Renewable Energy Policy

City Solar Goal

City Solar Goal 50 MW installed by 201250 MW installed by 2012 Wind Initiative

Wind Initiative 150 MW of new wind regionally150 MW of new wind regionally by 2012by 2012 Biogas Project

Biogas Project 2 MW plant operating at the Southeast 2 MW plant operating at the Southeast Water Treatment Control Facility (2003) Water Treatment Control Facility (2003) Climate Policy

Climate Policy 20% below 1990 by 201220% below 1990 by 2012

재생가능 재생가능 에너지 에너지 정책 정책

(20)

Program Highlights Program Highlights

City Solar Bond

City Solar Bond $100 million in 2001 $100 million in 2001 for solar, other renewables and high for solar, other renewables and high--

efficiency projects for public efficiency projects for public buildings

buildings

CityCity--State PartnershipState Partnership ‘‘Emerging Emerging Renewables Rebate Program

Renewables Rebate Program’’ covers covers 50% of residential installation costs 50% of residential installation costs up to $4.50 /

up to $4.50 / WWpp

주요 주요 정책 정책 프로그램 프로그램

(21)

Moscone

Moscone Convention Center Convention Center

First city solar project completed:

First city solar project completed:

combines 670 kW PV system and combines 670 kW PV system and

high efficiency technologies high efficiency technologies

Cost:

Cost:

$4.2 million PV +

$4.2 million PV +

$3.2 million

$3.2 million efficiency upgradesefficiency upgrades

모스콘 모스콘 컨벤션 컨벤션 센타 센타

Annual reduced electricity consumption:

Annual reduced electricity consumption: 5.3 5.3 GWhGWh Annual savings:

Annual savings: $639,000$639,000

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(22)
(23)

Long Island Power Long Island Power

Authority (LIPA) Authority (LIPA)

New York New York

Customers served: 1.1 million Customers served: 1.1 million

Area: 3200

Area: 3200 kmkm22

Annual electric use: 18,400

Annual electric use: 18,400 GWhGWh Residential: 45%

Residential: 45%

Industrial/commercial: 55%

Industrial/commercial: 55%

롱 롱 아일랜드 아일랜드 (LIPA) (LIPA) 뉴 뉴 욕 욕

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(24)

Wind Initiative Wind Initiative

140 MW offshore wind park 140 MW offshore wind park

RFP signed RFP signed

Solar Pioneer Program Solar Pioneer Program

$6.00 /

$6.00 / WpWp PV install incentivePV install incentive 11stst Year: 0.4 MW capacity Year: 0.4 MW capacity

installed, providing 1.0

installed, providing 1.0 GWhGWh of green energy annually

Renewable Energy Strategies Renewable Energy Strategies

of green energy annually

재생가능 재생가능 에너지 에너지 전략 전략

(25)

U.S. Energy Supply by Fuel (

U.S. Energy Supply by Fuel ( Mtoe Mtoe ) )

미국의미국의 연료별연료별 에너지에너지 공급공급

00 0 2020 20 4040 40 6060 60 8080 80 100100 100 120120 120 140140 140 160160 160

19701970

1970 197319731973 197619761976 197919791979 198219821982 198519851985 198819881988 199119911991 199419941994 199719971997 200020002000 Coal Oil Gas Electricity

Coal Oil Gas Electricity Heat Renewables Heat Renewables

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(26)

U.S. Commercial Energy Supply by Fuel (

U.S. Commercial Energy Supply by Fuel ( Mtoe Mtoe ) )

미국 미국 연료별 연료별 상업용 상업용 에너지공급 에너지공급

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880

Wood Coal

Wood Coal OilOil

(27)

Historical and Forecasted US Oil Production Historical and Forecasted US Oil Production

미국의미국의 석유생산의석유생산의 추세와추세와 전망전망

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

Million barrels/yearMillion barrels/year

40004000

Historical data Historical data

EIA 2002 forecast*

EIA 2002 forecast*

Exponential decline Exponential decline

EIA forecast is used for theEIA forecast is used for the 2001-2001- 2010 period only.2010 period only.

Remaining Oil

Remaining Oil = = 94.2 MM bbl94.2 MM bbl Known Reserves

Known Reserves = 18.6 MM bbl= 18.6 MM bbl Undiscovered Oil

Undiscovered Oil = 75.6 = 75.6 MM bblMM bbl

35003500

30003000 25002500 20002000 15001500 10001000 500500

00

19501950 19701970 19901990 20102010 20302030 20502050 20702070

(28)

Million barrels/yearMillion barrels/year

00 500500 10001000 15001500 20002000 25002500

20102010 20202020 20302030 20402040 20502050 20602060 20702070

Forecasts of US PV energy supply and US oil production Forecasts of US PV energy supply and US oil production

PV = 61.8 PV = 61.8

MM bbl MM bbl

PV = 44.2 PV = 44.2

MM bbl MM bbl Oil = 60.2

Oil = 60.2 MM bbl MM bbl

미국의미국의 태양광태양광 에너지에너지 공급과공급과 석유생산석유생산 전망비교전망비교

OilOil PV 10% targetPV 10% target PV 15% targetPV 15% target

(29)

Historical and Forecasted EU Oil Production Historical and Forecasted EU Oil Production

유럽연합의

유럽연합의 석유생산석유생산 추세와추세와 전망전망

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

Million barrels/yearMillion barrels/year

00 500500 10001000 15001500 20002000 25002500

19701970 19901990 20102010 20302030 20502050 20702070

Historical

Historical datadata IEA forecast IEA forecast

Exponential decline Exponential decline

Remaining Oil

Remaining Oil = = 32.1 MM bbl32.1 MM bbl Known Reserves

Known Reserves = 12.5 MM bbl= 12.5 MM bbl Undiscovered Oil

Undiscovered Oil = 19.6 MM bbl= 19.6 MM bbl

(30)

Comparison of forecasts of EU PV and EU oil production Comparison of forecasts of EU PV and EU oil production

유럽연합의

유럽연합의 태양광태양광 에너지에너지 공급과공급과 석유생산석유생산 전망비교전망비교

OilOil PV 10% targetPV 10% target PV 15% targetPV 15% target

Million barrels/yearMillion barrels/year

00 500500 10001000 15001500 20002000

20102010 20202020 20302030 20402040 20502050 20602060 20702070

43.8 MM bbl 43.8 MM bbl

31.4 MM bbl 31.4 MM bbl 14.6 MM bbl

14.6 MM bbl

(31)

Capital Costs per kW for Electric Power Plants(1930-1990) Capital Costs per kW for Electric Power Plants(1930-1990)

50 200 600 1000

Costs (constant $/kW)

MW

Source: T. R. Casten. 1995. The Energy Daily (September 7).

1930

1970 1950

1990

1980

Combined

Combined--CycleCycle Gas Turbines Gas Turbines

Nuclear Nuclear Plants Plants

발전소별발전소별 건설건설 단가단가 ($/kW)($/kW)

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

(32)
(33)

Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Center for Energy and Environmental Policy

Projected U.S. Energy Mix by Source (

Projected U.S. Energy Mix by Source ( Mtoe Mtoe ) )

CoalCoal OilOil GasGas NuclearNuclear RenewablesRenewables SavingsSavings

00 10001000 20002000 30003000 40004000 50005000 60006000 70007000 80008000 90009000 10000 10000

20002000 20052005 20102010 20152015 20202020 20252025 Million ToeMillion Toe

Savings from Efficiency Gains

Savings from Savings from Efficiency Gains Efficiency Gains

Note: Data from U.S. EIA,

Note: Data from U.S. EIA, Annual Energy Outlook Annual Energy Outlook (2003)(2003)

미국의미국의 연료별연료별 에너지에너지 공급공급

Referensi

Dokumen terkait