arXiv:2108.11188v1 [quant-ph] 25 Aug 2021
August 26, 2021 0:33 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE main
Modern Physics Letters A
©World Scientific Publishing Company
FINITE THERMAL PARTICLE CREATION OF CASIMIR LIGHT
MICHAEL R. R. GOOD∗
Physics Department & ECL, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Kazakhstan.
ERIC V. LINDER,1,2 FRANK WILCZEK3,4,5,6
1Energetic Cosmos Laboratory, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Kazakhstan.
2Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics & Berkeley Lab, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
3Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
4T. D. Lee Institute & Wilczek Quantum Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
5Department of Physics & Origins Project, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 25287, USA.
6Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SE-106 91, Sweden.
Received 31 July 2019 Revised (Day Month Year)
A new solution for an analytic spectrum of particle creation by an accelerating mir- ror (dynamical Casimir effect) is given. It is the first model to simultaneously radiate thermally and emit a finite number of particles.
Keywords: Moving Mirrors; Dynamical Casimir Effect; Black Hole Evaporation.
1. Trajectory
Evaporating black holes,1 acceleration radiation,2 and moving mirrors,3 have no known particle production model that has global finite count N and thermal ra- diation spectra Nω. We present such a spectrum via a new4 and simple moving mirror.
Particle production models that give an exact Planck spectrum of thermal radi- ation with a temperatureT =κ/2π(where κsets the scale -the surface gravity in the black hole context) are numerous, but all models with exact thermal radiation
∗This proceedings contribution is based on a June 28, 2019 talk given by MRRG at the 4th Casimir Symposium in St. Petersburg, Russia. The author’s present address is Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
1
August 26, 2021 0:33 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE main
2 M. Good, E. Linder & F. Wilczek
have total divergent particle production.a This infinity is no problem when calcu- lating the particle density,5 but necessarily involves an infrared divergence in the spectrum resulting in infinite soft particles with zero frequency.b
The moving mirror model (see e.g. some recent important works7, 8) has the Carlitz-Willey trajectory,10which is an eternally thermal Planckian motion with a dynamic but simple acceleration,11 α(τ) = c/τ, whereτ is the proper time. The global particle count diverges because the mirror accelerates forever. The diver- gence is more widely associated with the assumption of asymptotically null trajec- tories.12, 13Naively, one might try to solve this by constructing asymptotically static trajectories,14–17 and they do in fact produce a finite amount of particles; however, the drawback is no Planck distribution!
Therefore it would be worthwhile to have a solution with finite thermal particles, with no light-like travel.15We construct this by building on the Schwarzschild mir- ror,18–21which has a one-to-one correspondence to the black hole, with trajectory κv = −e2κx, where v is advanced null time, v = t+x, and (x, t) are lab space- time coordinates,c= 1. This is a light-like trajectory that suffers from information loss,c infinite particle production, and infinite energy production. However, at late times the spectra is exactly Planckian with temperatureT =κ/2π. Reflecting this reflector, and introducing a new dimensionful parameterg, the new trajectory is
gv=−sinh(2κx). (1)
This mirror is solvable and the thermal character is maintained when g ≫ κ. It changes the light-like trajectory of the Schwarzschild mirror to an asymptotically static worldline (time-like path), resulting in a finite total particle production.
2. Spectrum
Using the trajectory Eq. (1) in the beta Bogolubov coefficient integral,22 βωω′ = −1
4π√ ωω′
Z −∞
+∞
dx e2iωx−iωpv(x)(ωnv′(x)−2ω), (2) results in a new beta with analytic expression,4
βωω′ =−
√ωω′
πκωpe−πω2κKiω
κ
ωp
g
, (3)
where Kn(z) is a modified Bessel function of the second kind, andωp,n≡ω±ω′. The beta coefficient is used for calculating the particle spectrum,Nω, detected at right null infinity surfaceIR+ by integrating the modulus squared of Eq. (3),
Nω= Z ∞
0 |βωω′|2dω′ . (4)
aLarge but finite particle emission in a Friedmann universe has been calculated.5
bSoft particles signal a remnant6 in the moving mirror model.
cEntanglement entropy plays an important role in particle creation models, and takes particularly simple forms in the moving mirror model.17, 22–25
August 26, 2021 0:33 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE main
Finite Thermal Particle Creation of Casimir Light 3
The result forNωis analytic but complicated.dHowever, to leading order for large g≫κ= 1, the result has a temperatureT = 1/2πwith:
Nω= Γ¯ω
eω/T −1, (5)
where ¯Γω ≡ A/π+B/4, A ≡ ln (2g/ω) +ℜ(Hiω)−γ−1, Hn is the Harmonic number,γ= 0.577 is Euler’s constant, and
B≡(ω/2g)2iωcsch(πω)
(2ω+i)Γ(1 +iω)2 +(ω/2g)−2iωcsch(πω)
(2ω−i)Γ(1−iω)2 . (6) Fig. 1 illustrates the resulting spectrum Nω, Eq. (5), showing the desired absence of infinite soft particles in the infrared regime,ω→0.
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
ω
1 2 3 4 5 6
N
ωFig. 1. The spectrum,Nω, Eq. (5), detected at right null infinity,IR+, of the asymptotically static thermal mirror is plotted vs frequencyω, in units ofκ= 1. The 1+1 dimensional thermal spectrum from this asymptotically static solution has no infrared divergence (no soft particles asω→0) similar to a typical 3+1 dimensional blackbody curve; hereg > κwithg/κ= 106.
The thermal nature of the particle emission is evident from the Planck factor in Eq. (5), as ¯Γ → ln(2g)/π = constant, whenω ≫ κ= 1. Wave packets can be used to resolve the thermal particle emission in frequency or time.1, 12, 26, 27Eq. (5) allows the total particle count to be obtained by a single numerical integration of Nω overω,
N = Z ∞
0
Nωdω , (7)
rather than a double numerical integration of the Bogolubov coefficients, |βωω′|2, over bothωandω′. Integration of Eq. (7) with ultra-relativistic speed (g≫κ) gives the most particle production. A finite large total emission of particles obtained here is similar to what is expected from an effervescent thermal black hole,28 leaving no trace of a remnant.29–31
dThe hypergeometric result has a non-thermal form of energy flux wheng∼κ.
August 26, 2021 0:33 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE main
4 M. Good, E. Linder & F. Wilczek
Acknowledgments
MG is funded from Kazakhstan MES Grant BR05236454 and by the ORAU Re- search Grant No. 090118FD5350. Thanks is given to the organizers, in particular Galina Klimchitskaya, Vladimir Mostepanenko, and the anonymous reviewers of the Proceedings of the 4th Casimir Symposium, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2019.
References
1. S. W. Hawking,Commun. Math. Phys.43199 (1975).
2. W. G. Unruh,Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
3. S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. Davies,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A348, 393 (1976).
4. M. R. R. Good, E. V. Linder and F. Wilczek,Phys. Rev. D101, 025012 (2020).
5. A. Grib, S. Mamaev and
V. Mostepanenko,Vacuum Quantum Effects in Strong Fields (St. Petersburg, Fried- mann Laboratory Publishing, 1994).
6. P. Chen, Y. Ong and D. Yeom,Phys. Rept.603(2015).
7. S. A. Fulling and J. H. Wilson, Phys. Scripta 94, 014004 (2019).
8. W. Cong, E. Tjoa and R. B. Mann,J. High Energy Phys.1906, 021 (2019).
9. E. G. Brown and J. Louko,J. High Energy Phys.1508, 061 (2015).
10. R. D. Carlitz and R. S. Willey,Phys. Rev. D 36, 2327 (1987).
11. M. Good and E. Linder,Phys. Rev. D 97, 065006 (2018).
12. M. R. R. Good, P. R. Anderson and C. R. Evans,Phys. Rev. D 88, 025023 (2013).
13. M. R. R. Good,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1350008 (2013).
14. W. R. Walker and P. C. W. Davies,J. of Phys. A, 15, 9, L477 (1982).
15. F. Wilczek,Black holes, Membranes, Wormholes and Superstrings, eds. S. Kalara and D. Nanopoulos (World Scientific, 1993), p. 1-21.
16. M. Good and E. V. Linder,Phys. Rev. D 96, 125010 (2017).
17. M. Good and E. V. Linder,Phys. Rev. D 99, 025009 (2019).
18. M. R. R. Good, P. R. Anderson and C. R. Evans,Phys. Rev. D 94, 065010 (2016).
19. M. R. R. Good,Proc. of 2nd LeCoSPA Symposium, eds. P. Chen (World Scientific, 2017), p. 560.
20. P. Anderson, M. Good and C. Evans,Proc. of Fourteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, eds. M. Bianchi, R. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (World Scientific, 2016), p. 1701.
21. M. Good, P. Anderson and C. Evans,Proc. of Fourteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, eds. M. Bianchi, R. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (World Scientific, 2016), p. 1705.
22. M. Good, K. Yelshibekov and Y. Ong,J. High Energy Phys.1703, 013 (2017).
23. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 443 (1994).
24. P. Chen and D. Yeom,Phys. Rev. D96, 025016 (2017).
25. J. Hwang, H. Park, D. Yeom and H. Zoe, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73, 1420 (2018).
26. M. R. R. Good,Memorial Volume for Kerson Huang, eds. K.K. Phua, H.B. Low, and C. Xiong (World Scientific, 2017), p. 113.
27. M. R. R. Good and Y. C. Ong,J. High Energy Phys.1507, 145 (2015).
28. M. R. R. Good and E. V. Linder,New J. Phys.23, 043007 (2021).
29. M. Good, Y. Ong, A. Myrzakul and K. Yelshibekov, Gen. Rel. Grav. 51, 92 (2019).
30. M. R. R. Good,Universe 4, 122 (2018).
31. A. Myrzakul and M. Good,Proc. of the Fifteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, eds. E.
Battistelli, R. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (World Scientific, 2019).
