Template Review Review
on____________________________________________________________________________
(manuscript title)
(manuscripts code)
№ п/п
Name of criterion Summary of criteria Reviewer Comment Score
from 0 to 10
1 2 3 4 5
1 Correspondence of the title of the manuscript to its content
The title of the manuscript is
informative, in a logical form reflects the content of the article.
2 The quality of the author's summary (abstract)
The abstract in a brief form reflects all the essential facts contained in the main part of the publication, follows the logic of the description of the results adopted by the authors, contains convincing concrete
formulations of the scientific novelty and practical significance of the work
3 Relevance Possibility of implementation and applicability of ideas, methods, technologies
4 Novelty, Science It is clearly formulated and reflected in the introduction, what is the expansion, deepening of the modern level of knowledge in the studied area. The primary sources and publications in the scientific periodicals of the last 3-5 years of
release are analyzed (mainly)
1 2 3 4 5
5 Originality Ideas, research methods, methods for solving the tasks and / or testing were not known previously
6 Innovation New process, product, based on new, previously unknown technologies, methods and / or methodologies 7 Importance The results, their theoretical and
practical significance are clearly formulated and reflected in the conclusion.
8 Structured Logicity, connectedness, sequence of presentation
9 Spelling and Grammar
Compliance of presentation scientific style
10 Quality of design Compliance with the requirements of the editorial board on the
availability, content and design of the article and article components.
The quality and information content of the graphic material.
11.Conclusion:
11.1. I recommend for publication
11.2. I recommend publication with correction of comments (in case of minor corrections)
11.3. Return to the authors for processing with subsequent re-review
11.4. To refuse to authors in the publication of the manuscript.
(Underline whatever applicable)
Notes to. P. 11.2 Total
Proposals for processing according to clause 11.3
Reviewer data: name, degree, title, place of work.
Reviewer Signature Date
