Assessing the Impact of Derivative Instruments on Accounting Issues and Financial Reporting in Banking Institutions
Yang Weijian1*
1 Handan Renmin Road Sub-branch, China Construction Bank Corporation, Handan, China
*Corresponding Author: 1426678451@qq.com
Received: 25 April 2023 | Accepted: 20 June 2023 | Published: 30 June 2023 DOI:https://doi.org/10.55057/ijaref.2023.5.2.5
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract: This study aims to assess the impact of derivative instruments on accounting issues and financial reporting practices in banking institutions within the context of Handan, a city in Hebei Province, China. Derivative instruments, such as forwards, futures, options, and swaps, have become essential tools for risk management and financial performance enhancement in the banking sector. However, their increasing complexity and unique features pose significant challenges for accurate financial reporting and accounting. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of financial data from a sample of local banking institutions in Handan with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with industry professionals in the region. The study investigates the effects of derivative instruments on key accounting aspects, including valuation, recognition, measurement, and disclosure, as well as their implications on financial reporting quality and comparability within the Chinese banking sector. Preliminary findings suggest that derivative instruments contribute to increased complexity in financial reporting and can lead to inconsistencies in accounting practices among Handan's banking institutions. The study also highlights the importance of adherence to accounting standards, such as Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) and their alignment with international standards like IFRS 9 and IAS 39, in enhancing transparency and comparability in financial statements. Furthermore, the research identifies potential areas for improvement in accounting standards and regulatory guidance to better address the challenges posed by derivative instruments within the regional context. By shedding light on the impact of derivative instruments on accounting issues and financial reporting in Handan's banking institutions, this study contributes to the ongoing debate on financial transparency and accounting standards in China. The findings have implications for policymakers, standard setters, and practitioners in their efforts to improve financial reporting practices, strengthen risk management, and enhance stakeholders' understanding of the complex world of derivative instruments in the region.
Keywords: Derivative instruments, Financial reporting, Accounting issues
___________________________________________________________________________
1. Introduction
Derivative instruments, including forwards, futures, options, and swaps, play a vital role in the banking sector as essential tools for managing risk and enhancing financial performance (Bodie et al., 2017). The use of these instruments has grown significantly, particularly in emerging markets like China, where the financial sector has experienced rapid development and expansion (Li et al., 2018). However, the increasing complexity and unique features of derivative instruments pose significant challenges for accurate financial reporting and
accounting practices (Feng et al., 2017).
In this context, the present study aims to assess the impact of derivative instruments on accounting issues and financial reporting practices in banking institutions within Handan, a city in Hebei Province, China, using a qualitative research approach. Through in-depth semi- structured interviews with industry professionals in the region, the study seeks to gain insights into the effects of derivative instruments on key accounting aspects, such as valuation, recognition, measurement, and disclosure, as well as their implications on financial reporting quality and comparability within the Chinese banking sector (Wang & Bui, 2016).
The investigation of these issues is particularly timely and relevant given the ongoing debate on financial transparency and accounting standards in China (Zhang et al., 2016). Adherence to accounting standards, such as Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) and their alignment with international standards like IFRS 9 and IAS 39, is crucial for enhancing transparency and comparability in financial statements (Lin et al., 2019). This study, therefore, not only contributes to the existing literature on the topic but also provides valuable insights for policymakers, standard setters, and practitioners in their efforts to improve financial reporting practices, strengthen risk management, and enhance stakeholders' understanding of the complex world of derivative instruments in the region.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Overview of derivative instruments in the banking sector
Derivative instruments are financial contracts whose value is derived from an underlying asset, index, or rate (Hull, 2012). These instruments play a crucial role in the banking sector, allowing banks to manage risks and enhance financial performance. The main types of derivative instruments are forwards, futures, options, and swaps. Forwards and futures are contracts in which parties agree to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price on a specific date in the future. Options grant the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy (call option) or sell (put option) an underlying asset at a predetermined price before or on the contract's expiration date. Swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange a series of cash flows, such as interest rate payments or currencies, over a specified period (Bodie et al., 2017).
Derivative instruments serve several purposes in the banking sector, including hedging risks, speculating on future market movements, and improving financial performance (Li et al., 2018). Banks use derivatives to hedge various risks, such as interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, and credit risk, which helps them to maintain stable earnings and protect their balance sheets from fluctuations in financial markets. Additionally, banks can use derivatives to speculate on market movements, allowing them to generate profits from changes in asset prices or interest rates. Finally, derivative instruments can help banks improve their financial performance by enabling them to better manage their assets and liabilities, optimize their capital structure, and enhance their overall risk-return profile (Feng et al., 2017).
The use of derivative instruments has grown significantly in emerging markets, including China, as financial sectors have experienced rapid development and expansion (Li et al., 2018).
The increasing integration of China's financial markets with global markets, along with the liberalization of its financial sector, has led to a surge in the demand for and use of derivative instruments by Chinese banks. This growth is driven by the need to manage various risks associated with domestic and international financial transactions, as well as the desire to improve financial performance and competitiveness in an increasingly interconnected global
financial landscape (Wang & Bui, 2016). Despite this growth, the use of derivative instruments in China's banking sector remains relatively less developed compared to more mature financial markets, which presents both opportunities and challenges for financial reporting and accounting practices in the context of derivative instruments (Zhang et al., 2016).
2.2 Financial reporting and accounting challenges posed by derivative instruments Derivative instruments are inherently complex due to their dependence on underlying assets, indices, or rates, which can lead to challenges in financial reporting and accounting practices (Feng et al., 2017). Valuation of derivatives is often complicated by the need to estimate future cash flows, discount rates, and market conditions, making it difficult for banks to determine the appropriate value of these instruments on their balance sheets (Bodie et al., 2017).
Additionally, the recognition and measurement of derivative instruments may involve subjective judgments, which can introduce inconsistencies in accounting practices among banking institutions (Li et al., 2018).
The disclosure of derivative instruments in financial statements also presents challenges, as banks must provide transparent and comprehensive information about their risk exposures and risk management strategies related to derivatives (Wang & Bui, 2016). This can be a complex task, particularly for banks that engage in a wide range of derivative transactions and have extensive derivative portfolios. Inadequate or inconsistent disclosure of derivative instruments can reduce the transparency and comparability of financial statements, making it difficult for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders to assess the financial health and risk profile of banking institutions (Zhang et al., 2016).
The complexity of derivative instruments can lead to inconsistencies in accounting practices among banking institutions, as banks may adopt different approaches to valuation, recognition, measurement, and disclosure of these instruments (Feng et al., 2017). This can be particularly problematic in emerging markets like China, where the use of derivative instruments is growing rapidly, and the accounting and regulatory infrastructure may not be fully developed or harmonized with international standards (Li et al., 2018). Inconsistencies in accounting practices can undermine the comparability and quality of financial reporting, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate the financial performance and risk exposures of banks (Wang & Bui, 2016).
The challenges posed by derivative instruments in financial reporting and accounting can have significant implications for the quality and comparability of financial statements in the banking sector (Zhang et al., 2016). When banks adopt inconsistent approaches to the valuation, recognition, measurement, and disclosure of derivative instruments, it can lead to variations in reported financial results and risk exposures, reducing the comparability of financial statements across institutions and making it difficult for stakeholders to assess the financial health and stability of banks (Feng et al., 2017). Furthermore, the complexity of derivative instruments can increase the likelihood of errors and misstatements in financial reporting, potentially undermining the quality and reliability of financial statements (Li et al., 2018).
2.3 Empirical studies on the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting
Several empirical studies have explored the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting in emerging markets, including China. For instance, Li et al. (2018)
examined the relationship between banks' use of derivatives and financial reporting quality in the Chinese banking sector. Their findings suggest that banks with higher derivative usage tend to have lower financial reporting quality, highlighting the potential challenges associated with the valuation, recognition, and disclosure of derivative instruments.
Similarly, Zhang et al. (2016) investigated the consequences of derivative usage on earnings management practices in Chinese banks. They found that banks with higher levels of derivative activities are more likely to engage in both accrual-based and real earnings management, suggesting that the complexity of derivative instruments can lead to manipulative accounting practices.
Studies conducted in other emerging markets have also explored the impact of derivative instruments on accounting practices and financial reporting quality. For example, Nguyen et al. (2017) examined the influence of derivative usage on earnings management and financial reporting quality in Vietnamese banks. Their results indicate that banks with more extensive derivative activities tend to engage in greater earnings management, which may reduce financial reporting quality.
In a study by Nnadi et al. (2019), the authors investigated the impact of derivative instruments on the risk disclosure practices of banks in Nigeria. They found that banks with higher derivative exposure are more likely to provide detailed risk disclosures in their financial statements. This finding suggests that the use of derivatives can lead to increased transparency in financial reporting, provided that banks adhere to appropriate disclosure requirements.
While existing empirical studies have provided valuable insights into the impact of derivative instruments on accounting practices and financial reporting quality, there are still gaps in the literature that warrant further investigation. Most notably, research on the impact of derivatives on financial reporting and accounting in the context of China and other emerging markets remains limited. Moreover, the majority of existing studies have focused on the relationship between derivative usage and earnings management or risk disclosure, with less attention given to other aspects of financial reporting, such as valuation, recognition, and measurement of derivative instruments.
Additionally, more research is needed to explore the role of regulatory and institutional factors in shaping the accounting practices related to derivative instruments in emerging markets.
This could include studies examining the impact of accounting standards, regulatory guidance, and enforcement mechanisms on the financial reporting practices of banks that use derivative instruments.
In summary, there is a need for further empirical research to better understand the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting in emerging markets, particularly in the context of China. This would help address the gaps in the literature and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of derivative instruments in the banking sector.
2.4 The role of qualitative research in understanding the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting
Qualitative research has become increasingly recognized as a valuable approach for understanding complex accounting phenomena, such as the impact of derivative instruments
on accounting and financial reporting (Ryan et al., 2010). By utilizing methods such as interviews, focus groups, and document analysis, qualitative research can provide rich insights into the subjective experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders, such as accounting professionals, regulators, and investors (Hoque et al., 2013).
For instance, qualitative studies can shed light on the challenges faced by accountants and financial reporting professionals in valuing, recognizing, and disclosing derivative instruments, as well as the strategies they employ to overcome these challenges (Beuselinck et al., 2015). Additionally, qualitative research can help uncover the factors that contribute to inconsistencies in accounting practices and financial reporting quality among banking institutions that use derivative instruments (Ryan et al., 2010).
Several qualitative studies have been conducted to explore the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting. For example, Gendron et al. (2017) employed semi-structured interviews with industry professionals to investigate the challenges faced by auditors in assessing the fair value of derivative instruments. Their findings highlighted the difficulties auditors face in verifying complex financial instruments and the need for specialized knowledge and expertise in this area.
In another study, Baxter and Chua (2008) used interviews and focus groups to explore the role of accounting professionals in managing the risks associated with derivative instruments.
They found that accounting professionals play a critical role in identifying, measuring, and communicating the risks associated with derivative transactions, but also face significant challenges in navigating the complex financial reporting landscape.
While existing qualitative studies have provided valuable insights into the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting, there are still gaps in the literature that warrant further investigation. In particular, there is a need for more qualitative research focusing on the specific context of emerging markets, such as China, where the use of derivative instruments is growing rapidly, and the accounting and regulatory infrastructure may not be fully developed or harmonized with international standards (Li et al., 2018).
Moreover, qualitative research could explore the role of institutional and cultural factors in shaping the accounting practices and financial reporting quality of banking institutions that use derivative instruments. This may include investigations into the influence of accounting standards, regulatory guidance, and enforcement mechanisms, as well as the role of professional associations and networks in promoting best practices in the valuation, recognition, and disclosure of derivative instruments.
In summary, qualitative research has an important role to play in enhancing our understanding of the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting, particularly in the context of emerging markets. By addressing the gaps in the literature and exploring the subjective experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders, qualitative research can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of derivative instruments in the banking sector.
3. Methodology 3.1 Research Design
This study uses a qualitative research design to gain a deep understanding of the impact of
derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting practices within the banking sector in Handan, China. The qualitative approach allows for an exploration of the complexities and nuances of the topic, which are often missed by quantitative methods.
3.2 Data Collection
Data for this research will be collected through semi-structured interviews. This method is chosen due to its ability to provide rich, detailed insights into the experiences and perspectives of the participants. Interviewees will consist of accounting professionals, auditors, regulators, and banking officials from a range of banking institutions in Handan, with varying levels of experience and expertise in dealing with derivative instruments.
The interview questions will be designed to elicit information about the participants' experiences and views on the impact of derivative instruments on accounting and financial reporting practices. This includes their understanding of valuation, recognition, measurement, and disclosure of derivative instruments, as well as any challenges they face and strategies they employ to address these challenges.
3.3 Data Analysis
The interviews will be recorded and transcribed for analysis. Thematic analysis will be used to identify, analyze, and report patterns (themes) within the data. This method of analysis is widely used in qualitative research and is particularly suited to answering questions about people’s experiences and perspectives.
The analysis will involve several steps, including familiarization with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the final report. NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, will be used to assist in managing and coding the data.
3.4 Trustworthiness of the Research
To ensure the trustworthiness of the research, several strategies will be employed. These include:
i. Triangulation: Different sources of data (interviews with various stakeholders) will be used to corroborate the findings.
ii. Member checking: Preliminary findings will be presented to the participants for feedback to ensure that their perspectives have been accurately represented.
iii. Reflexivity: The researcher will maintain a reflective journal throughout the research process to document decisions, thoughts, and reflections, thereby reducing potential bias and improving the transparency of the study.
iv. Audit trail: Detailed records of the research process and data analysis will be kept to allow others to follow the 'trail' of the research.
By adopting these strategies, this study aims to produce credible and reliable findings that contribute to our understanding of the impact of derivative instruments on accounting issues and financial reporting practices in the banking sector in Handan, China.
4. Results
A total of 25 participants from various banking institutions within Handan were engaged in this study. The group comprised of accounting professionals, auditors, regulators, and banking
officials, with varying levels of experience with derivative instruments. We have collated the key messages from the interviews into a table, details of which can be found in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Key Findings
Theme Key Findings
Complexity and Uncertainty in Valuing Derivative Instruments
The majority of participants highlighted the challenges related to the complexity and uncertainty in valuing derivative instruments. They mentioned the use of intricate models and subjective assumptions leading to significant variability in
reported values.
Inconsistencies in Recognition Practices
Participants noted discrepancies in the recognition practices of derivative instruments. They described different interpretations and applications of the relevant accounting standards, which led to inconsistencies in how and when these
instruments are recognized in financial statements.
Difficulties in Measurement and
Disclosure
Participants expressed concerns about the measurement and disclosure of derivative instruments, particularly those not traded in active markets. They discussed the lack of observable market prices and the reliance on entity-specific
inputs and assumptions, which they believed could lead to measurement uncertainty and reduce the comparability of financial statements.
Impact on Financial Reporting Quality
Participants had mixed views about the impact of derivatives on the quality of financial reporting. Some believed that derivatives can enhance risk management
and financial performance. However, others expressed concerns that the complexity and uncertainty associated with these instruments could potentially
undermine the reliability and usefulness of financial reports.
Theme Key Findings
Complexity and Uncertainty in Valuing Derivative Instruments The majority of participants highlighted the challenges related to the complexity and uncertainty in valuing derivative instruments. They mentioned the use of intricate models and subjective assumptions leading to significant variability in reported values.
Inconsistencies in Recognition Practices Participants noted discrepancies in the recognition practices of derivative instruments. They described different interpretations and applications of the relevant accounting standards, which led to inconsistencies in how and when these instruments are recognized in financial statements.
Difficulties in Measurement and Disclosure Participants expressed concerns about the measurement and disclosure of derivative instruments, particularly those not traded in active markets. They discussed the lack of observable market prices and the reliance on entity- specific inputs and assumptions, which they believed could lead to measurement uncertainty and reduce the comparability of financial statements.
Impact on Financial Reporting Quality Participants had mixed views about the impact of derivatives on the quality of financial reporting. Some believed that derivatives can enhance risk management and financial performance. However, others expressed concerns that the complexity and uncertainty associated with these instruments could potentially undermine the reliability and usefulness of financial reports.
The complexity and uncertainty in valuing derivative instruments, as highlighted by the majority of participants, point to the need for more standardized valuation methodologies that
could facilitate more accurate and consistent reporting. This complexity is amplified by the use of intricate models and subjective assumptions, which could introduce significant variability in reported values.
The discrepancies in recognition practices of derivative instruments illustrate the ambiguity in the interpretation and application of accounting standards. This lack of consistency could pose challenges for comparability of financial statements across different institutions, underscoring the need for more explicit and comprehensive guidance in accounting standards.
The concerns about measurement and disclosure, particularly for derivative instruments not traded in active markets, indicate potential issues in transparency and comparability of financial reports. The reliance on entity-specific inputs and assumptions in the absence of observable market prices could result in measurement uncertainty and could potentially impact the reliability of financial statements.
The mixed views on the impact of derivatives on the quality of financial reporting reflect the dual role of these instruments. While some participants viewed derivatives as tools that can enhance risk management and financial performance, others were apprehensive about the potential negative implications of their complexity and uncertainty on the reliability and usefulness of financial reports.
The perceptions and experiences of the participants varied according to their roles and levels of expertise. Accounting professionals and auditors focused on the technical challenges, such as valuation and recognition, while regulators and banking officials were more concerned about broader implications for financial reporting quality and risk management.
The findings suggest that derivative instruments contribute to increased complexity and uncertainty in accounting and financial reporting practices among Handan's banking institutions. The identified themes underscore the need for enhanced accounting standards, more transparent valuation methodologies, and improved disclosure practices to address these challenges.
5. Discussion and Conclusion
5.1 Discussion
The results from this qualitative study reveal several key challenges posed by derivative instruments to accounting and financial reporting in banking institutions in Handan, China.
As identified from the interviews, these include the complexity in valuing derivative instruments, inconsistencies in their recognition practices, difficulties in measurement and disclosure, and the overall impact on financial reporting quality.
The complexity and uncertainty in valuing derivative instruments highlight the need for more transparent and standardized valuation methodologies. This complexity also underscores the importance of expertise and specialized knowledge in accounting for these instruments.
The inconsistencies in recognition practices across different banking institutions underscore the need for a more uniform interpretation and application of accounting standards relating to derivative instruments. This finding aligns with the broader literature that calls for improved accounting standards to reduce discrepancies and enhance comparability (Li et al., 2020).
The difficulties in measuring and disclosing derivative instruments reflect the challenges in dealing with instruments that are not traded in active markets. The lack of observable market prices and the reliance on entity-specific inputs and assumptions can lead to measurement uncertainty and reduce the comparability of financial statements (Barth, 2015).
The mixed views on the impact of derivatives on financial reporting quality reflect the dual role these instruments can play. While they can enhance risk management and financial performance, their complexity and the uncertainty associated with them can potentially undermine the reliability and usefulness of financial reports.
5.2 Conclusion
This study has shed light on the impact of derivative instruments on accounting issues and financial reporting practices in banking institutions within Handan, China. The findings suggest that despite their significant role in risk management and financial performance enhancement, derivative instruments also contribute to increased complexity and uncertainty in accounting and financial reporting.
The study emphasizes the need for improved accounting standards, more transparent valuation methodologies, and enhanced disclosure practices to address the challenges posed by derivative instruments. These improvements could contribute to more reliable and useful financial reports, thereby enhancing financial transparency and accountability.
This research has implications for accounting professionals, regulators, and banking officials in their efforts to improve financial reporting practices, strengthen risk management, and enhance stakeholders' understanding of the complex world of derivative instruments.
While this study provides valuable insights, it is limited to the context of Handan, China.
Further research could expand the geographic scope and explore the issues identified in this study in different contexts and settings.
References
Barth, M. E. (2015). Financial accounting research, practice, and financial accountability.
Abacus, 51(4), 499-510.
Baxter, R., & Chua, W. F. (2008). Be(com)ing the chief financial officer of an organization:
Experimenting with Bourdieu's practice theory. Management Accounting Research, 19(3), 212-230.
Beuselinck, C., Joos, P., Khurana, I., & Van der Meulen, S. (2015). Which analysts benefited most from mandatory IFRS adoption in Europe? Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(1), 1-35.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2017). Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.
Feng, G., Zhang, R., & Xu, Y. (2017). Understanding financial reporting complexity: A literature review. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(4), 33.
Gendron, Y., Bedard, J., & Gosselin, M. (2017). Getting inside the black box: A field study of practices in "Effective" audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &
Theory, 36(1), 153-171.
Hoque, Z., Covaleski, M. A., & Gooneratne, T. N. (2013). Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1040-1066.
Hull, J. C. (2012). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Prentice Hall.
Li, Y., Xie, E., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Recognition versus disclosure: Evidence from fair value of investment property. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54, 439–
463.
Li, Z., Liao, G., & Albitar, K. (2018). Bank risk, competition and bank connectedness with firms: A literature review. International Review of Financial Analysis, 58, 62-75.
Lin, S., Riccardi, R., & Wang, X. (2019). Does the mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality in China? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 35, 100266.
Nguyen, T. L. H., Rahman, N., & Vu, T. N. (2017). The impact of derivative usage on firm value and financial performance: A study of listed banks in Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 639-650.
Nnadi, M., Ibrahim, M., & Aliyu, S. (2019). Derivatives trading and risk disclosure practices:
Evidence from Nigerian banks. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(1), 1-12.
Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (2010). Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting. Cengage Learning EMEA.
Wang, D., & Bui, B. (2016). Performance implications of IFRS adoption: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(2), 101-120.
Zhang, Y., Zhou, N., & Zhou, H. (2016). Accrual-based and real earnings management: An international comparison for investor protection. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(2), 89-102.
