International Journal of Business and Economy (IJBEC) eISSN: 2682-8359 [Vol. 3 No. 1 March 2021]
Journal website: http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ASYMMETRIC EFFECT OF REAL EXCHANGE RATES AND OIL PRICES INTO INFLATION: EMPIRICAL
EVIDENCE IN ASEAN-5
Jaratin Lily1*, Mori Kogid2*, Debbra Toria Nipo3, Sidah Idris4 and Imbarine Bujang5
1 2 3 4 Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MALAYSIA
5 Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kota Kinabalu, MALAYSIA
*Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected]
Article Information:
Article history:
Received date : 29 November 2020 Revised date : 5 January 2021 Accepted date : 5 February 2021 Published date : 14 March 2021
To cite this document:
Lily, J., Kogid, M., Nipo, D., Idris, S.,
& Bujang, I. (2021). ASYMMETRIC EFFECT OF REAL EXCHANGE RATES AND OIL PRICES INTO INFLATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IN ASEAN-5.
International Journal Of Business And Economy, 3(1), 60-74.
Abstract:Inflation is the rate at which the cost of goods and services is rising over time. This study investigates the asymmetric inflationary impact of oil prices and real exchange rates in ASEAN 5 (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand). The study applies the NARDL (Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag) method to answer the hypothesis. The data consists of monthly data on consumer price index (CPI), oil prices, real exchange rates from 1979 until 2019. In all sample countries, the findings showed that there is a long-term co-integration between study variables. The findings revealed evidence of a long-run asymmetric inflationary impact of the oil prices in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand, whereas short-run asymmetry occurs in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Furthermore, the results showed that an increase in oil prices appears to increase inflation significantly, but the impact of oil prices becomes less or insignificant when oil prices fall in the long run.
Meanwhile, the long-run asymmetric inflationary impact of exchange rates only occurs in Thailand, whereas only Singapore has no evidence of short-term asymmetry.
Surprisingly, in the case of Thailand, further analysis revealed that an appreciation of home currency seems to increase the local inflation implying that the cost reduction of the imported goods and services were not passed through the consumers. These results offer an alternate interpretation of how inflation responds to exchange rates and oil prices that are useful to the relevant parties in developing an effective mitigation strategy to monitor inflation rates. Future research
1. Introduction
Inflation is defined as an increase in the general price level. In a market economy, prices of goods and services will often change over time. Some prices are rising and some prices are declining. Inflation happens when there is a significant rise in the cost of goods and services in general, not just of individual goods and services. Inflation can be an issue as it makes tommorow’s money saved today less valuable. In other words, inflation reduces the customer’s purchasing power (Choi et al., 2018). For example, if an investor received 5 per cent of investments in shares and bonds, but the inflation rate was 3 per cent, the investor would only receive 2 per cent in real terms.
Over the years, economists have investigated determinant factors affecting inflation on various segments of the economy and on the total output of goods and services but failed to have consensus due to the significance of the factors differ across country (Nusair, 2019). Cost-push inflation is one such form of inflation. Generally, cost-push inflation may occur in the event of an inelastic demand curve, where demand can not easily be adjusted in line with rising prices (Jongwanich et al., 2019). This kind of inflation arises as prices rise due to higher production costs, such as raw materials and wages. The higher production costs have caused decline in the supply of goods and services while the demand for goods and services remains constant (Kandil
& Morsy, 2011). As a result, the increased cost of production is passed on to customers in the form of higher prices for finished products. Increase in oil prices and imported materials, can be seen as one of the signs of potential cost-push inflation. For example, if the price of oil increases, businesses that are directly or indirectly influenced by the increase in oil prices due to increase in energy and transportation costs lead to price increase of their products and services (Long & Liang, 2018). Moreover, the rise in price of imported raw materials due to exchange rates could also cause companies to pass along the additional cost to their customers, resulting in higher prices for final customer’s goods and services (Hemmati et al., 2018)..
needs to include the demand-pull factors in the model with structural break.
Keywords: Asymmetric Effect, Real Exchange Rates, Oil Prices, Inflation, NARDL, ASEAN-5.
Studies on oil price inflationary effect have received attention since the oil price crisis in the 1970s (Barsky & Kilian, 2004). Previous literature generally have supported the transmission of oil prices towards inflation (Chou & Tseng, 2011; Ibrahim & Said, 2012), though there is mixed evidence in recent years (Chen, 2009; Choi et al., 2018; Gómez-loscos et al., 2011).
Although both studies by Ibrahim and Said (2012) and Chou and Tseng (2011) support the cost push inflation hypothesis of oil prices in Malaysia and Taiwan, respectively, in the long run but the effect is insignificance in the short run. Meanwhile, the declining effect of oil prices towards inflation has been found in some studies (e.g., Choi et al., 2018; Gómez-loscos et al., 2011) mostly because the presence of government intervention to mitigate the oil price inflatonary effect. Meanwhile, Jongwanich and Park (2009) revealed that oil price movements explain less than 30 percent of Asia’s inflation. The exchange rate pass-through theory (ERPT) is an important theory that incorporates the theory of exchange rate and inflation (Amoah &
Aziakpono, 2017). ERPT refers to the transition of changes in the exchange rate of import (export) prices of particular goods to the price of goods in the currency of the destination country. If the percentage in import prices is less than percentage change in exchange rate, the ERPT is said to be partial or incomplete, as exporters (or importers) absorb a portion of the exchange rate adjustment (Ghosh, 2009).
As most of the earlier studies have assumed a linear relationship between oil prices and exchange rates towards inflation, the assumption of the linear model may be too restrictive in the case of oil prices and exchange rates pass-through into inflation, so an extension of this needs to be investigated further (Choi et al., 2018). The linear relationship implies that an increase or a decrease in oil prices or exchange rates tend to have equal effect towards inflation, but in the opposite direction which is not always true. As for oil price case, oil price reduction will not always reduce inflation in a same magnitude or size during the oil price reduction or increment (Davari & Kamalian, 2018). Eventhough a decrease in oil prices are expected to lower cost of production, there is a possibility that domestic firms only reduce the cost of production to a small extent which leads to a smaller decrease of CPI (Atil et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2018). Therefore, there will be only small reduction or no change in prices of goods and services. Besides, with active government intervention in its monetary policy to maintain inflation, there is also possibility of an increase in oil price showing insignificant effect on inflation (e.g., Choi et al., 2018; Gómez-loscos et al., 2011).
In the case of exchanges rates, although a home currency depreciation (appreciation) is expected to increase (decrease) domestic inflation, however, the impact also depends on several factos which are the elasticity of demand, whether firms will pass on the exchange rate costs or benefits into consumers and the fraction of a country's trade denominated in foreign currencies (Gopinath, 2015). For example, when there is home currency depreciation, rather than passing through all the change of exchange rate costs into their imports, firms may absorb some of the costs. In addition, central bank plays a significant role in managing the exchange rates in ASEAN countries (Lily et al., 2014; Parsley & Popper, 2006; Tan & Chong, 2008;
Xing & Wan, 2006). The central bank tends to intervene against the foreign exchange rate if the exchange rates go beyond the desirable rate by buying and selling their foreign reserves or changing the interest rate (Patnaik et al., 2011). This intervention could also influence how exchange rate affect the domestic inflation.
Thus, these consequence implies that there is an asymmetric oil price and exchange rate pass- through into inflation. From the empirical perspective, most studies have indicated the asymmetric relationship between oil prices and inflation (Bala & Chin, 2018; Davari &
Kamalian, 2018; Lacheheb & Sirag, 2018; Salisu et al., 2017). Therefore, this study revisits the impact of the asymmetric effect of oil prices and exchange rates into inflation in ASEAN-5.
The current study applies nonlinear ARDL approach to capture the asymmetric effects for both factors. Furthermore, NARDL method performs better for small sample size of data. Besides, the NARDL approach can test asymmetric effect of the series in long run and short run simultaneously (Shin et al., 2014). Understanding the asymmetric oil price inflationary effects can assist the monetary authorities to manage the country policy comprehensively.
2. Method 2.1 Data
Monthly data (end of period) from January 1979 until March 2020 were used for empirical analysis which consists of Consumer Price Index (CPI)(2010 basis), Brent crude oil prices, and the real domestic currency vis-à-vis the foreign currency, the US dollar. The sample countries consist of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand (ASEAN-5). The databases that contain this relevant information are obtained from International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank databases. In this study, the real exchange rates are calculated by using the purchasing power parity (PPP) approach. Thereafter, the real exchange rate (RER) is defined as the nominal exchange rate (NER) of the domestic currency vis-à-vis the U.S dollar multiplied by the ratio of the price level in the USA to the price levels in the domestic currency.
Thus, a rise (fall) in the real exchange rate index indicates a real depreciation (real appreciation) of the local currency. To calculate the RER, the formula from Osinubi and Amaghionyeodiwie’s (2009) study is used in a simple form as follows:
=  US =  US
H H
P CPI
RER NER NER
P CPI . (1) Where RERare the real exchange rates, NER is nominal exchange rates, PUSis the US CPI, PH
is the domestic CPI.
2.2 Econometric Models
In this study, firstly, descriptive statistics analysis, and unit root tests were used to analyse the characteristics of the variables. Then, the asymmetric cointegration model of NARDL was utilized to test the asymmetric effects of the exchange rate (RER) risks on FDI inflows over the long run in each country studied.
2.2.1 Unit Root Tests
Before further analysis, the unit root tests were conducted to check for the stationarity and order of integration of the series variables. In this study, the Dickey-Fuller (DF), Augmented Dickey- Fuller (ADF) (Dickey & Fuller, 1979) and Phillips-Perron (PP) (Phillips & Perron, 1988) unit root tests were adopted. The lag length for the ADF test was chosen by minimizing the Schwarz information criterion. Another alternative approach is the Phillips-Perron (PP) test suggested by Phillips (1987), extended by Perron (1988) as well as Phillips and Perron (1988). The details of the tests will not be further explained since both tests have been extensively discussed in numerous studies.
2.2.2 NARDL Model
The recently developed NARDL approach by Shin, Yu, and Greenwood-Nimmo (2014) which accounts for nonlinear and asymmetric adjustment was employed. The general form of the NARDL model can be shown as:
( )
  −  +−  −−  − + +− − −−
= =
 = 0+ 1 1+ 2 1+ 3 1+
 +
 +  +1 0
p q
t t t t i t i i t i i t i t
i i
y y x x y x x e (2)
At first, the following equation was specified to illustrate the asymmetric long-run equation of inflation (Ibrahim, 2015; Shin et al., 2014):
  +  −  +  −
= 0+ 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
t t t t t t
cpi oilp oilp realusd real sdu e (3)
whereoilpandrealusdare the oil prices and real exchange rates, respectively, where
( )
=     0, 1, 2, 3, 4 is a vector of unknown long-run parameters to be estimated. Meanwhile the oilpt+and oilpt+represents the partial sums of positive and negative changes in oilp, while
+
realusdt andrealusdt+represents the partial sums of positive and negative changes inrealusd:
( ) ( )
+ + + +
= = = =
=
 =
 =
 =
1 1 1 1
max ,0 ; max ,0
t t t t
t i i t i i
i i i i
oilp oilp oilp realusd realusd realusd (4)
and
( ) ( )
− − − −
= = = =
=
 =
 =
 =
1 1 1 1
min ,0 ; min ,0
t t t t
t i i t i i
i i i i
oilp oilp oilp realusd realusd realusd (5)
To be specific, equation (3) can be framed or reformulated into an ARDL setting (Ibrahim, 2015; Pesaran et al., 2001; Shin et al., 2014) as in equation (6) as follows:
( )
  
   
 
+ − + −
− − − − − −
=
+ + − − + + − −
− − − −
=
= + + + + + +
+ + +  +  +
0 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 1
1 5
0
p
t t t t t t i t i
i q
i t i i t i i t i i t i t
i
cpi oilp oilp realusd realusd cpi
oilp oilp realusd a
cpi
re usdl e
(6)
where all variables are previously defined, and p and q are lag orders. The term +
= 0 qi i
and +
= 0 qi i
measure the short-run influences of positive changes in the oil prices and real exchange rates (appreciation in USD) while −
= 0 qi i
and −
= 0 qi i
measure the short-run influences of negative
changes in the oil prices and real exchange rates (depreciation in USD). From equations (3) and (6), both1= − 2/ 1 and 2 = − 3/ 1represent the long-run impacts of an increase and decrease in oil prices on inflation. Meanwhile, both3 = − 4/ 1 and 4 = − 5/ 1represent the long-run impacts of an increase and decrease in real exchange rates on inflation. Testing for the presence of cointegration among the variables involves the Wald F test of the null hypothesis ofH0:1=2 =3=4 =5 =0 as in standard ARDL model (Pesaran et al., 2001). If the cointegration exists (the computed F-statistic exceeds the upper bound critical value), then an examination of long-run and short-run asymmetries using the Wald F test can be done. Thus, using Wald test in Equation (6), long run asymmetry test can be done on the null hypotheses of H0: − 2/ 1=− 3/ 1 (oil prices) and H0 : − 4/ 1 =− 5/ 1(real exchange rates).
Meanwhile, the short run asymmetry tests can be tested on the null hypotheses of
+ −
= =
=
=
0
0 0
q q
i i
i i
H (oil prices) and + −
= =
=
=
0
0 0
q q
i i
i i
H (e.g., Delatte & López-Villavicencio, 2012;
Fousekis et al., 2016).
3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Descriptive Analysis
CPI across all sample countries show an upward trend (see Figure 1). Additionally, the CPI in all sample countries experienced a significant increase during the periods of the Asian financial crisis (1997-1999) and the global financial crisis (2007-2009).
1 2 3 4 5 6
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGINCPI
3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGMYCPI
1 2 3 4 5
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGPHCPI
3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGSGCPI
3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGTHCPI
Notes: Incpi (Indonesia CPI), mycpi (Malaysia CPI), Phcpi (The Philippines CPI), sgcpi (Singapore CPI) and Thcpi (Thailand CPI)
Figure 1: Consumer Price Index
The RER is the sample countries also showed fluctuations over the sample period (see Figure 2). In this study, the exchange rate was quoted as units of home currency per USD, thus an increase in RER indicates depreciation in local currency against USD. As in the case of CPI, the RER across all sample countries show an upward trend (depreciation) during the periods of the Asian financial crisis (1997-1999) and the global financial crisis (2007-2009).
8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGINDREALUSD
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGMYREALUSD
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGPHREALUSD
.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGSGREALUSD
3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
LOGTHREALUSD
Notes: Inrealusd (Indonesia), myrealusd (Malaysia), Phrealusd (The Philippines), sgrealusd (Singapore) and Threalusd (Thailand)
Figure 2: Real Exchange Rates
The oil prices also showed fluctuations over the sample period (see Figure 3) but show an upward trend. Basically, there is sudden change of the downward trend especially during the economic crisis in mid of 1980s, during the Asian Financial crisis and Global Financial Crisis.
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 LOGOILP
Figure 3: Oil Prices
3.2 Unit Root Tests
Both the unit root tests (ADF and PP) indicated that all of the variables were integrated less than I (2) at the 1 per cent significance level (see Table 1). Therefore, the NARDL model is appropriate to investigate the inflationary effect of oil prices and exchange rates.
Table 1: Stationarity Test
Variable Level First Difference
Country ADF PP ADF PP
Indonesia CPI -1.3058 -0.8407 -6.5958*** -13.5359***
Oil Price -2.3368 -2.1481 -16.5039*** -16.0045***
LCU/USD -2.4897 -2.4869 -15.3541*** -20.911***
Malaysia CPI -2.7858 -2.7293 -16.7454*** -16.6686***
Oil Price -2.3368 -2.1481 -16.5039*** -16.0045***
LCU/USD -2.3334 -2.4505 -20.9793*** -20.9762***
Philippines CPI -2.0202 -2.1159 -6.2764*** -12.4602***
Oil Price -2.3368 -2.1481 -16.5039*** -16.0045***
LCU/USD -2.0952 -2.0716 -23.1195*** -23.1223***
Singapore CPI -3.535 -3.2958 -5.7432*** -23.2561***
Oil Price -2.3368 -2.1481 -16.5039*** -16.0045***
LCU/USD -1.9398 -1.9187 -22.2326*** -22.245***
Thailand CPI -2.9811 -2.982 -15.7907*** -16.3728***
Oil Price -2.3368 -2.1481 -16.5039*** -16.0045***
LCU/USD -2.2763 -2.1468 -19.398*** -19.414***
Notes: ***, ** and * denote significance at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. The constant and trend terms are included in the test equations, and the optimal lag order for the ADF test is selected using SIC. All variables are in logarithm form.
3.3 Asymmetric Inflationary Effect of Oil Prices
Table 2 shows the NARDL estimation results. Following the NARDL bounds tests, evidence of cointegration between inflation, oil prices and real exchange rates was found to be significant at 5 percent in all sample countries, suggesting that both oil prices and real exchange rates co- move with inflation over the long run. Further examinations revealed that long run relationship between inflation and oil prices is asymmetric in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, whereas short-run asymmetry occurs in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. These results suggest that the inflation is affected by positive and negative oil prices differently.
Furthermore, the results showed that an increase in oil prices appears to increase inflation significantly, but the impact of oil prices becomes less or insignificant when oil prices fall in the long run. For example, the results show that the inflation is affected by the increase in oil prices in the long run for Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand while only Indonesia showed that inflation is significantly affected by a decrease in oil prices at the 5 percent significant level.
The transmission of oil price inflationary effect shows that with 1% increase in oil prices, it will increase inflation by 0.4818% in Indonesia, 0.2334% in Thailand and 0.0479% in Singapore. Meanwhile, only in the case of Indonesia, 1% decrease in oil prices also caused 0.327% decrease in inflation (positive relationship). The smaller coefficient for oil prices implied that the transmission of oil prices to inflation is quite lower (Jongwanich et al., 2019).
Consistent with the previous studies, an increase of oil price has higher magnitude than a decrease on oil price (e.g., Apergis & Vouzavalis, 2018; Lacheheb & Sirag, 2018; Long &
Liang, 2018) indicating the oil price asymmetric inflationary effect. In addition, no significant evidence of the long-run effect was found in the case of Malaysia and the Philippines for both an increase and decrease of oil prices, even though the symmetric test indicated evidence of asymmetric inflationary effect of oil prices in both countries. The result implied that government still have control on domestic oil price. Therefore, when oil prices increase, the related authorities increase the domestic oil prices due to cost pressure which leads to increase in firm’s production cost, and then the inflation. However, when the oil prices decrease, some domestic firms have less incentive to lower domestic cost of production in line to oil price reduction leading to less or insignificant effect of oil prices. But, it might be different in the case of Indonesia which indicates that there is possibility of active government intervention in controlling the effect of an increase global crude oil prices while consumer benefit from the reduction of global crude oil prices. It could be possible as Indonesia is one of the oil producer countries.
3.4 Asymmetric Inflationary Effect of Real Exchange Rates
The findings also indicated that there is evidence of long run effect of real exchange rates in Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand (see Table 2). The effect of exchange rate on inflation is consistent with some previous studies (Jiang et al., 2013; Naz et al., 2012). In Indonesia, the appreciation (positive series) and depreciation (negative series) of USD lead to an increase (a (a decrease) in local inflation respectively whereas in Thailand, only when there was depreciation (negative series) in USD would lead to domestic inflation decrease. In addition, there is evidence of incomplete exchange rate pass-through in those countries where the coefficients for exchange rates (either positive or negative series) is less than 1 which support the previous studies (Campa & Goldberg, 2005; Edward & Ramayah, 2016). For example, in the case of Indonesia, the coefficient for positive and negative series are 0.82 and 0.88, respectively. The insignificance of exchange rates in the case of Malaysia and The Philippines imply that the cost reduction of the imported goods and services were not passed through to the final products.
Interestingly, in the case of Singapore, the finding showed that the appreciation (positive series) and depreciation (positive series) of USD lead to a decrease and an increase in inflation, respectively. The result was not consistent with most previous studies (e.g., Edward &
Ramayah, 2016; Gopinath, 2015) but consistent with Edward and Ramayah’s (2016) study.
Results from Edward and Ramayah’s study indicate there was significant and negative relationship between exchange rate (SGD per USD) and inflation. Due to the nature of Singapore’s economy which mainly relies on manufacturing, international trade is important for Singapore, thus exchange rate movement could affect the domestic inflation.
The possible reason for the case of Singapore could be due to the government policy on price stability. Although Singapore government does not have explicit inflation target, basically inflation in Singapore is considered quite low (Jongwanich et al., 2019). With the local currency depreciation (appreciation), theoretically the domestic inflation could increase (decrease), but with the implicit government intervention to ensure price stability, the impact
However, only Thailand showed that exchange rate has an asymmetric effect on domestic inflation in the long run. It indicated that 1 percent depreciation of USD (appreciation in local currency) increased the inflation by 0.7173% in Thailand. Meanwhile, except for Singapore, all other sample countries indicated existence of asymmetric effect in the short run.
Table 2: Asymmetric Estimation Results Indonesia
[9, 4, 0, 10, 2]
Malaysia [2, 0, 2, 0, 1]
The Philippines [5, 0, 2, 2, 2]
Singapore [7, 0, 5, 1, 1]
Thailand [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]
Long Run Cointegration Tests
FPSS 8.170*** 15.132*** 5.456** 11.839*** 16.077***
Long Run Coefficients
OILP+ 0.4818*** 0.0887 0.2756 0.0479** 0.2334***
OILP- 0.3227** 0.0262 -0.2083 -0.0145 0.042
EX+ 0.8277*** 0.1773 0.4041 -0.4235*** 0.0387
EX- 0.8883*** 0.302 2.0727 -0.2718*** 0.7173***
Symmetric Test
OILP: WaldLR 31.0678*** 3.807 0.6838 6.888*** 55.554***
OILP: WaldSR 3.956** 18.757*** 10.0707** 11.2077*** 0.509
EX: WaldLR 0.343 0.540 0.4009 1.2159 22.052***
EX: WaldSR 37.118*** 18.729*** 68.8455*** 0.03426 5.554**
Diagnostic Tests Serial correlation:
LM(4) 2.293871 2.011906 6.8416 5.6199 5.8027
Heteroskedasticity:
ARCH(4) 0.111783 1.0171 19.4325*** 19.573*** 70.9051***
CUSUM S U S S U
Notes: (1) ***, **and * denote significance at 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively; (2) The lag order is between (), [ ] indicates the lag order; (3) WLR and WSR refer to the Wald test for long run and Short run symmetry respectively. (4) FPSS indicates the Paseran-Shin-Smith (2001) F test statistic. Following Shin et al.(2014), the conservative of critical values is applied, k = 2.
The Upper bound critical values (Table C1(ii)) are 4.46, 5.16 and 6.67 at 10 percent, 5 percent and 1 percent respectively. All variables are in logarithm form.
4. Conclusion
The findings implied two main conclusions. Although the findings support the argument of cost push inflation hypothesis, but the current study confirms the asymmetric oil price and exchange rate pass-through into inflation. Under the cost-push inflation, the increase (decrease) cost of oil prices and exchange rates will increase (decrease) the cost of imported goods and services leading to lower inflation. However, results from the study revealed that kind of relationship could be asymmetric where the inflation responds to an increase and decrease of both oil prices and exchange rates differently. For instance, an increase in oil prices appears to increase inflation significantly, but the impact of oil prices becomes less or insignificant when oil prices fall in the long run as in the case of Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand. Secondly, the degree to which inflation responds to exchange rate fluctuations and oil prices is important in understanding inflation dynamics. Although both oil prices and exchange rates pass-through showed lower transmission into inflation, it seems that oil prices pass-through is lower than exchange rate movement.
The results of the current study have theoretical and practical implications in determining factors affecting inflation based on the cost push hypothesis. Firstly, for the body of knowledge, the study extended the theoretical understanding of how inflation responds to exchange rates and oil prices by providing evidence of asymmetric inflationary effect of oil prices and exchange rate movements. The findings could be an alternative explanation on the insignificance effect of oil prices and exchange rates on inflation. Besides, the results also offer the stylised effect of exchange rate pass-through into inflation. Therefore, this knowledge will help to understand the stylised effect of oil price and exchange rate pass-through into inflation.
Secondly, the element of asymmetric effect of oil price and exchange rate pass-through into inflation should not be ignored by researchers and policymakers. Thus, it is also important to give more consideration towards these asymmetric effects when controlling domestic inflation through monetary and fiscal policy. Government should implement diverse monetary policy efforts to deal with the negative effect from the oil price and exchange rate oil price movements that cause an increase in domestic prices. Hence, monetary authorities’ knowledge and understanding on the link between these two cost-push inflation factors is crucial, to maintain inflation under control to benefit all users. Besides, the knowledge will also assist the policymakers to adopt appropriate policies to accommodate the asymmetries. In addition, the government should also invest on alternative energy as well as improve energy usage efficiency, to soften the negative impact of oil price movements.
There are some limitations in this study. Firstly, the model which is applied in this study does not include the structural break. Thus, future research should consider the inclusion of structural break because the time series are sensitive with some economic changes such as economic and financial crisis. Secondly, as this study mainly discuss the cost push inflation factors, future research also needs to include the demand-pull factors in the model.
5. Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Universiti Malaysia Sabah for supporting this work under the Skim Geran Penyelidikan Insentif PhD (PHD0029-2020).
6. Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Amoah, L., & Aziakpono, M. J. (2017). Exchange rate pass-through to consumer prices in Ghana: is there asymmetry? International Journal of Emerging Markets, 00–00.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-07-2016-0179
Apergis, N., & Vouzavalis, G. (2018). Asymmetric pass through of oil prices to gasoline prices:
Evidence from a new country sample. Energy Policy, 114(November 2017), 519–528.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.046
Atil, A., Lahiani, A., & Nguyen, D. K. (2014). Asymmetric and nonlinear pass-through of crude oil prices to gasoline and natural gas prices. Energy Policy, 65, 567–573.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.064
Bala, U., & Chin, L. (2018). Asymmetric Impacts of Oil Price on Inflation: An Empirical Study of African OPEC Member Countries. Energies, 11(11), 3017.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113017
Barsky, R. B., & Kilian, L. (2004). Oil and the Macroeconomy Since the 1970s. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042632708 Campa, J. M., & Goldberg, L. S. (2005). Exchange Rate Pass-Through into Import Prices.
Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 679–690.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003465305775098189
Chen, S.-S. (2009). Oil price pass-through into inflation. Energy Economics, 31(1), 126–133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.08.006
Choi, S., Furceri, D., Loungani, P., Mishra, S., & Poplawski-Ribeiro, M. (2018). Oil prices and inflation dynamics: Evidence from advanced and developing economies. Journal of
International Money and Finance, 82, 71–96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.12.004
Chou, K., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2011). Pass-Through of Oil Prices to CPI Inflation in Taiwan.
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 69(69), 73–83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01418.x
Davari, H., & Kamalian, A. (2018). Oil price and inflation in Iran: Non-linear ARDL approach.
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(3), 295–300.
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
85046778854&partnerID=40&md5=779319c855ca2b3dbbeb1a017355ca16
Delatte, A.-L., & López-Villavicencio, A. (2012). Asymmetric exchange rate pass-through:
Evidence from major countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 34(3), 833–844.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.03.003
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
Edward, T., & Ramayah, M. (2016). The Determinants of Inflation: An ASEAN Perspective.
Taylor’s Business Review: A Contemporary Business Journal, 6(August), 49–72.
Fousekis, P., Katrakilidis, C., & Trachanas, E. (2016). Vertical price transmission in the US beef sector : Evidence from the nonlinear ARDL model. Economic Modelling, 52, 499–
506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.030
Ghosh, A. (2009). Exchange Rates, Currency Crisis and Monetary Cooperation in Asia. In R.
S. Rajan (Ed.), Exchange Rates, Currency Crisis and Monetary Cooperation in Asia (Vol.
1). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234192
Gómez-loscos, A., Montañés, A., & Gadea, M. D. (2011). The impact of oil shocks on the
Spanish economy. Energy Economics, 33(6), 1070–1081.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.016
Gopinath, G. (2015). The International Price System. In National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (Working Paper 21646; NBER Working Paper Series).
Hemmati, A., Niakan, L., & Varahrami, V. (2018). The external determinants of inflation: The case of Iran. Iranian Economic Review, 22(3), 741–752.
https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2018.66641
Ibrahim, M. H. (2015). Oil and food prices in Malaysia: a nonlinear ARDL analysis.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-014-0020- 3
Ibrahim, M. H., & Said, R. (2012). Disaggregated consumer prices and oil price pass‐through:
evidence from Malaysia. China Agricultural Economic Review, 4(4), 514–529.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17561371211284858
Jiang, C., Ma, Y., & An, Y. (2013). International portfolio selection with exchange rate risk: A behavioural portfolio theory perspective. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 648–659.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.10.004
Jongwanich, J., & Park, D. (2009). Inflation in developing Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(5), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.07.004
Jongwanich, J., Park, D., & Wongcharoen, P. (2019). Consumer price inflation in emerging Asia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 0(0), 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1574251
Kandil, M., & Morsy, H. (2011). Determinants of Inflation in GCC. Middle East Development Journal, 3(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793812011000351
Lacheheb, M., & Sirag, A. (2018). Oil price and inflation in Algeria: A nonlinear ARDL
approach. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.12.003
Lily, J., Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Lim, T. S., & Asid, R. (2014). Exchange rate movement and foreign direct investment in ASEAN economies. Economics Research International, 2014, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/320949
Long, S., & Liang, J. (2018). Asymmetric and nonlinear pass-through of global crude oil price to China’s PPI and CPI inflation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 31(1), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429292
Naz, F., Mohsin, A., & Zaman, K. (2012). Exchange rate pass-through in to inflation: New insights in to the cointegration relationship from Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2205–2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.07.012
Nusair, S. A. (2019). Oil price and inflation dynamics in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Energy, 181, 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.208
Osinubi, T. S., & Amaghionyeodiwe, L. A. (2009). Foreign direct investment and exchange rate volatility in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 6(2), 83–116.
Parsley, D. C., & Popper, H. A. (2006). Exchange rate pegs and foreign exchange exposure in East and South East Asia. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 992–1009.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.07.009
Patnaik, I., Shah, A., Sethy, A., & Balasubramaniam, V. (2011). The exchange rate regime in Asia: From crisis to crisis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 20(1), 32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2010.07.004
Perron, P. (1988). Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Further evidence from a new approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 297–332.
Phillips, P. (1987). Towards a unified asymptotic theory for autoregression. Biometrika, 74(3), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.3.535
Phillips, P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
Salisu, A. A., Isah, K. O., Oyewole, O. J., & Akanni, L. O. (2017). Modelling oil price-in fl ation nexus : The role of asymmetries. Energy, 125, 97–106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.128
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL framework. In R. C. Sickles & W. C. Horrace (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
Tan, H.-B., & Chong, L.-L. (2008). Choice of exchange rate system and macroeconomic volatility of three Asian emerging economies. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 1(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520840802252217
Xing, Y., & Wan, G. (2006). Exchange rates and competition for FDI in Asia. The World Economy, 29(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00791.x