• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Entrepreneurial Inclination Among Secondary School Teachers Of Kuala Muda Yan - UUM Electronic Theses and Dissertation [eTheses]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Entrepreneurial Inclination Among Secondary School Teachers Of Kuala Muda Yan - UUM Electronic Theses and Dissertation [eTheses]"

Copied!
21
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

b

HOH FOO KONG lllecwlber 19%

(c)HohFooKmg. l!M,AURights~.

(2)

Sekolah Siswazah ( G r a d u a t e S c h o o l ) Universiti Utara Malaysia

PERAKUAN KERJA TENS

(Certification Of Thesis Work)

Kami, yang bertandatangan, memperakukan bahawa (We, the undersigned, certify that)

HcxilxnmG

calon untuk ijazah

(candidate for the degree ofi Master of Science (Management) telah mengemukakan tesisnya yang bertajuk

(has presented his/her thesis of the following title)

ENTREPRENEURIAL INCLINATION AM(=IJGSECXNDARY-LTEA-OF KUALAt4UMYAN

seperti yang tercatat di muka surat tajuk dan kulit tesis (as it appears on the title page and front cover of thesis)

bahawa tesis tersebut boleh diterima dari segi bentuk serta kandungan, dan meliputi bidang ilmu dengan memuaskan.

(that the thesis is acceptable in form and content, and that a satisfactory knowledge of the field is coverd by the thesis).

AJK Tesis (Thesis Committee) Nama ASSOC. Prof. Dr. Add YaSeen

(Name)

(Penyelia Utama/Principal Superviiwr)

Nama(Name) Lim chee thee

Nama Tandatangan

(Name) (Signature)

Tarikh

(Date) /o - 1 2 a rQq6

(3)

P - I O N T O U S E

Rcqmts fix pelYh&mtocQpyortomakcothcruBeof~inthis~in wholeorinpartehouldbeaddmsedto:

Dean of Gfaduah School u-UtaraMalarysia

06010 shtok

(4)

Akat ukw y a n g d@nakun ten&i daripak &a bah@an; Bahagian A clan Bahagian B. Bahagkan A burtqjnan mengumpd makkmd &mqgr& manakdk Bahagian B i#igw&n nntnk meqydxr kcedrungan keusahcwman ?wpon&n.

Bdqgi’Bakatukwtni cMdwai&~skJaOrie~i~

htusahawanan yang dihasfh olkh Robinson et al (1991), Sh& kkcedwgan Am Keusa ytq &h&&an c&h D&am Uniwst@ Business Mud

(1988) dh dat ukwr Bard&a (1992).

Data yang dkwnpui t&h c&andtsti &qan menggudwn kaedkah t-test i&n ANOVA sadu arah nntuk menentkan kwan &i-&i &mqgrq# k e a&as

kc%~rongankeus~Panns 0.05 t&h dit%taphanssbogai tahapsw

untuk membuat keptwan msngenai ht*is.

Ber&sarh &pa&an hqjian, cadangawadangan unti kqkan farzlfutcm tekd

yang mmzncangprogrom iteswakawanan ’

. . . m

(5)

The present SW& investigated the rntLipprrrmrial inckaticm ofsec;andarv SCM

haders in KwakrMnt&z Y&L Spec$cal& it aimed to investigate the rekvtkmsh@s between entrep-’al tnclination andthepersonal charac&$sti~~, fmi&-ekzted f-P e?#vimment~,andti~ qfseconhy school teacher8 qf

KiiaklM.Yan.

In or&r to carry out this research, a &wr@ive qawnti~ stu& was carried out.

The units cfan+is are the SW schad teachers cfKitaka Muda Yon. Three hundred and thiwtwo teachers wers inch&d in the stn& through a mbination qf strat$ed randiwn sampiing cind cfommi- smgdiing. Questionnatres were distribnti to target res~~pers~ or through the school Ainistrators.

Therespcmeratewars90.6%.

The instrwnent used -&ted oftw parts; part A and part B. Part A was usedfw a hmographic survey and Part B wav used to me-e the entiprenewial inclination sfthe respon&n& The iat& part dthe insirument was &ted&m the Entrepreneurial Attiti Orienkatkm 5%x& dsvslopod by Robinsm (1991), the General Enbvpreneuriai Tend&y &eloped by the Durham Universi@ Business School (I 988), and Barcelona ‘s (I 992) swvey.

Data were analysed using the t-test and one way ANOVA to &ermine the dkreremxs in demographic char&ristics and their fleets on the entrepreneuriai inclination qf~~hers. The 0.05 keel ofsi&n+ance was wed as the critical kvet

fm

dkcisions regarding the lppc&esa.

This s&u&

fd that

sign&ant werences in entrepreneurial inckztion among teachers could be seen au&v three fm tested They are monthly income of the ibacher, k4y pa& held by the teacher and business experience out&ii& school. The other factors fsstsd cd0 not appear to have sign$cant dects on the en~preneuria~

inclination qfthe teachers.

Based on iire findings, suggestions forjkrther research and recommendations fop

&ision makers in poiicy

fmation

or enbwpreneurship akvebpment programmes have been fmardkd.

(6)

ACIUWWLEDGEMENT

Thew&efwi&eflto aclwwk+and$raalrthosewholnade~theeiapoesibte.

1. To Assock& Rofessor Dr. Adei Yawn, theais twpehor, Miss Lim Cbee thee, second at#gmkr, ad - Dr. Mibndre wini” B

Rw434

RwwchM~Iecturer,fatheirguidanct,,andandffor thecompk&mof~tficsis.

4. TotheFxbatkmPhy&ngandRcaamhDeparlment,Iblin&yofEducation,the KedahStatc~depsrtmcnt,acuitheIrc$oolswhichparticipatedinthe

tlamey, fmthcirpxmiwbn tocamyoutthe~,andtolheteach~whohad l-eqm&dtothtqlu#dioanabrt,for~coloperatian.

5. TothcPkipalofS.MSg.Layar, theS&arAseietwtsofS.M. S.Pasir, SM.

Batu Lima, SM. Gum, and S.M. Gum &mped& MdmMayKbor,Mr.

Balasundram,Mr.RaqjitShgh,andMrPrasadfath&as&tanwin disbibutiagancua conec~thequcstiomrainaintheirschode.

4. TomycoumemateaChanKearKeow,T~~S~ AUisonLeeGlmW4 YunWengKon&CburgFuiCbin,MobdOtkmrnYuaoff,Atlrt~~d LlmBeeLeewhohadhc@dinmanyway6toficibtcthecompletionoftfris thesis.

V

(7)
(8)

PIWMiWONTQusE ABSTRAK

AEWIRACT

AKNOW UST OF TABLES LIsToFFK3uREs

I INTRODUCTION

1.1

-aftishrdy

1.2 St&IlXWOfproManr 1.3 DChlithOfTCffnS 1.4 RolWKChobjactiv#, 1.5 ResarrchpuesbEaaa

1.6 - -

1.7 RtxwanhModel

1.8 S~oftheSbudy

1.9 . . .

-0fthcshrdy

WP ii . . . m iv

V

X

xii

1

1

3 3 5 7

9 :

11 ‘:

1 2 1 3

vii

(9)

2.23

2.2.6 2.2.7

228

IlI RESEARC!HDESIt3NANDMETHODOLDGY 3 . 1 Soummof-

3.1.1 unitof- 3.1.2 Pqlation

3.1.3 Sample&m Tccdmkpc

p4F

1 4

1 4 25 26

29

3 1

33 34

3 5 49

52

5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 7

(10)

-

3.2 TbcRaqmnb&

3.3 Da$iB~,T~.

3.3.1 TheIlwmmm&

33.2 P&t Study 3.3.3 Data(lTdhth 3.4 Data Andy&ii Tedmiquc

3.4.1 clitdau6cd~Dbcieioa~

Iv PRESENTATION AND DISCWHON OF FINDIIWS 4.1 l?h&tpand~

4.1.1 pcmonal- 4.1.2 Family Related Factom 4.1.3 Emriromnar&1FIctors 4.1.4 work-

v f$IMWWY, CONCUJSION, AND RECOIbfMENDA~ONS

5.1 SInmnary 5.2 Con&&n

pass 60 64 64 68 69

72 73 74 74 75 8 7 100 106

113

113 117 125 131 137 138 153

ix

(11)

153

Table No. Tii

p4F

3 . 3 DidbuthofT~~toschoofe

3.4 D of QQlahmh Items (Iadbpaadwrt VM)

Eaclhnahon of Male and Female TCMChU#

4.3 OfEthtlidtywith~ .

4.4 ofI3duamd Lewdwith.

4.5 AMlynisofvorinaEefor~~with

- -

5 8 5 9 62 66

67

71 76

7 8

8 0

8 2

84

86

8 8

(12)

Table No. LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED) Title

4.8 Meat& standard Deviation scores, and t-vahles for Entrepreneurial Incm of Teachers with Mothers Who are Housewks and Teachers W& Working Mothem

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

4.13

4.14

4.15

4.16

4.17

4.18

Analyb of Variance of Father’s Education with Entrepreneuriallnclination

Analyh of Vaknce of Mother’s Education with EnlreprmeurialInclination

Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values for Entrepreneurial Inclination of Awilabibty of Capital from Family Members and Non-f- Memlxm

Analyis of Variance of Birth order with Entrepreneurial Inclination

Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values fix Entrepreneurial In&nation of Teach- Who Reside in the Rural Area and Teachers Who Reside in the Urban AreaDuringtheirYouth

Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values for EntrepreneuriaI Jnclination of Teachem Who Reside in the Rural Area and Teachers Who Reside in the Urban Artabllilkgtheil-AdUlthood

Analyis o f Vaknce o f S u b j e c t s T a u g h t w i t h Entrepreneurial Inclination

Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values for Entrepreneurial Inclination of Teachers Who Hold Key Posts and Teachers Who Do Not Hold Key Posts in

School

Analyfs of valiance of Len&& of service with EntrepreneurialInc%nation

Mean, Standard Deviation Scores, and t-values for Entrepreneurial Inclination of Teachers With Business Exgxxience and Teachem Without T&hem Experience outside School

page 90

92 94

%

9 8

1 0 0

1 0 3

1 0 5

1 0 7

1 0 9

111

xi

(13)

LIST I 6r VIGURES

Figure . No.

1.1

Title

Schematic Diagram Showing the Relationship Between Personal Characteristics, Famiiy-related Factors, Environmental Factors, and Work Experience and Entrepreneurial Inclination Among Secondary Scholl Teachers of Kuala Muda Yan

2.1 The Operations Involved in Constructing the Questionnaire (Appendix II) in Order to Help IdenQ a Possible Measure of @ntrepreneurial Inclination

3.1 Distribution of Respondents According to Rack and Sex 3.2 Distribution of Respondents According to Age Group 3.3 Distribution of Respondents According to Monthly Income 3.4 Di&ibution of Respondents According to Educational Level

Pag&

11

51

61 61

6 3 64

xii

(14)

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1 . 1 Background of the 8tuciy

This study atbpted to ident@ the factors that are associated with entrepreneurial inclination. It would attempt to investigate the entrepreneuzial inclination among teachers in the Kuala Muda Yan district. An entrepreneur is&finedas%omeonewhoper&vesanoppntu@ a n d c r e a t e s a n organization to pmue it” @ygrakqlWl). Enlrepreneufial potential is a latent ability of individuals, regardless of their c-t job, to become an entfepmeur.

InFe~1991,DrMahathirMohamadoutlinedthcviaionofMalaysiato

be a w developed and klustklized nation by the year 2020. One of the challcngtsMalaysia~tofactinhereff~to~~~thievisionisto develop an economy that is competitive, dynamic, robust and Hent. One of the strategies to meet this challenge by the govenunentisto~de entrepreneurial development and skills traiuiq (Abdul41993).

Entreprenekal development will result in the setting up of more small and medium enterpkzs. These economic entities will not only complement

1

(15)

The contents of the thesis is for

internal user

only

(16)

AbdullahAbdulRahman.“MslsrysliaIn~-publicSector-. n. In A4akaysia’s Vision 2020 (ip. 361-382). Wited by Abmad Sarji Abdul Hamid. Petding Jaya: Pehmduk Publications. 1995.

Baharu Kemat. (1994, May). Orientasi Sikqg Keusahawanan Di Kalangan PoZiteknik Di Makzysia. Univekti Utara Malay& M. SC. thesis.

Bakar,A. and Ellis, W.H. (1990). Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, Second Edition. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/ Hti Publi&@

co..

Barcelona&C., and Valida,A.C. (1992). Inturelationahipa Between the Personal Variablea and Ewepreneuial Pokntials of Senior Studenta of Univeraiti Utara Malay&. Malaysian Mawgement Review, 29(4), 15-28.

Begley, TM., & Boyd, D.P.. 1985. Coqany and Chief Executive Ofiicer Characti Related to Financial Perfmce of Smalhx Businews. In Horn&y, J., Shils, E., Timmons, J., & Vesper, K. @ids.). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1985. Weksley, MA: Babwn College.

Belly RR. (1992 ). Task Role Motivation and Attributional Style as Predictors of Entrepreneuxial Perfwce: Female Sample Findings. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4, 331-344.

Bird, B.J. (1994). “Demographic Approaches to Entrepreneurship: The Role of Expexience and Background”. In KatqJ.A. and Bro&haw, R.H.Sr, (Eds.) Adbances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth @p. 1 l-48)..

Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai m Inc.

Boocock, G. (1996, July). Venture Capital in Malaysia. L.~ughborough UniwzGty Banking Centre. (Unpublished manuscript).

Brenner, O.C., I%ngle, C.D., & Gree&w, J.H. ( 1991, July). Pewived Fulfihnent of Orpkational Employment Vexsus Enkprenewship: Work Values and Career Intentions of Busiuesa College Graduates. Journal of Small Business iUanagement,29(3), 62-74.

Brockhaus, RH. Sr. (1993). “Series Introduction”. In Katz,J.A. and Brockhaus, RH.Sr., Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth.

Greenwich (pp. l-5), Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.

Bro&haus, RH.Sr. (1982). “The Psychology of the Entqreneur”. In Kent,C.k, Sexton, D-L., & Veper, K-H. (Ms.), Encyclspasdia of Entrepreneurship (@p. 39-71). En&wood Cliff& N.J.: Prentice IGIL

131

(17)

Bygwe, W.D. & Hofer, C.W. (1991, Winter). Theo&~ about Enmprenm.

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (Z), 13-22.

C&d, Sdy. (1990). The Enterprbing Tendency of Occupational Groups IntionalSmaflBusiness Journal) 9(4), 75-81.

carland, J.W. Jr. (1992) Entrepreneurship in a Small Business Setting: An hkpkvwtory Study. Univmpity of Georgia. PhD. thesis.

cassrud, AL., & Gaglio, C.M. (1993). “Demographics in m. Research: Guidelines for the Use of Demopphic Data”. Jn Katz,J.A. and Brockhaw, R.H.Sr., Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth. Greenwich (pp. 49-81). Conneclicut: Jai Press Inc.

Chandler, Gayien N & Hanks, Steven H. (1994,Spring ). Founder C!mqeknce, the Emkmment and Venture competence. Entrepreneurship Tiseory and Practice, 18 ( 3 X77-89.

Chong, K. S.. (1993). Chinese Entrepreneurship in Malaysia. Univmity of southenl California PhD. Thesis.

Cole, Arthur H. (1995).‘%ntrepreneumhip and Entxqmneuial History” Yn Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms. edited by Lkaay, Harold C.

Brookiield,US: An Elgar Reference Cok&on.

Dolinsky, Arthur L. (1993, Fall). The Efkts of Education on Business Own-:

A Lq@udid Study of Women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1),43-53.

DuCelk, J. (1986). Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development: Further Analysis ofPhase I Data. Ncwbury, St. Boston: McBu & Co..

Faitiie,R. W. (1994). Three Essays on Ethnic and Racial Selfemployment (&trepreneurship). Northwe&rn Unkmity. F%D. Thesis.

Fillion, L. J. (1994). Ten Steps to Entrepsnemial Teaching. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 1 l(lO), 68-78.

Fraboni, M., & Sabtone,R. (1991). Meamanent and Evatuation of Work Strew and Values in Male and Female Entrepreneurs. Journal OfSmall Buisness Management.

Gamer, W.B. & Shaver, K.G. Gatewood, E. & Katz, J.A. (1994). Finding Ihe Entrepreneur in Enbqxene~. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,

18(3), 5-9.

(18)

Gamer, W.B. (1989, Summer).“Who is an Entnqreneur? Is the Wrong Questio$.

Ent?q.weneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47-68.

Game, Y. (1990). An Experience in Training in the Area of En-p and StartingaBuainesa inQuebec:theProject’BecomeanEntrepreneur’.In

Donckela, R., and Mettinen, A.m.), New Readings and Perspectives in Entrepreneurship @p. 99-114). Brookfield: AvebuIy.

Gnyawali, D.R. and Fogcl. (1994, Summer). “Environmenta fix En&preneumhip Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications”.

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 4362.

Gray, D.A. (1989). The Entrepreneurs Complete Self-Assessment Gui&: How to Determine Your Potential for Business. London: Kogan Page.

Hatbn, T.S. (1994). Stint Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship as A&&d by Participation in a Small Business Institute Prqgramme. Univefsity of Misaouxi-cohlmbia. PhD. thesis.

Hian, C.K. (1995). “Factora Associated with Entrepreneuial Inclination: An Empixical Study of Business Unw in Hong Kong”. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 29-41.

Wch, R.D., & Bruah,C. (1986, October). Characte&ics of the Minority Entrepreneur. Journal ofSmall Business Management, 24(4), 1-8.

Horn&y, J.A. and Ticks,N.B. (1983). “Capturing 21 Heff&mpa”. In Hornadq, J.A., Timmons, J . A . , a n d V e s p e r , K.H.., (Eds.). F r o n t i e r s o f Entipreneurship Research 1984. Wellesley, MAzBabson College.

Hull, D.L., Bosley, J.J., & Udell, G.G. (1980). “Renewing the Hunt for the HefI&mp: Ident@& Potential En-em by their Characteri&cs”.

Journal of Small Business Management, 18(l), 11-18.

Jennings, D. F. (1994). Multiple Perspectives ofEntrepreneurship, Text, Readings, and Cases. Cinch Ohio: South Western Publi&ing Co.

Johnson, B.R (1990, Spring). “Toward a Multidimensional Model of Entzqxeneumhip: The Case of Achievement Model Motivation and the Entmpreneur”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3) 39-54.

Johnson, David and Ma, Rosa. (1994, July). “Rewg&ing Entnpmeurial Potential in Graduate Business Start-up: The Development of a Behaviourally Baaed

Assessment Tool”. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2( 2F57-682.

1 3 3

(19)

Kantor, J. (1988, Fall). “Job Choke and Locus of Control as Predictors of En- Potential: A Study of Entqr Level and Exit-level of Business a n d l3b@mhg SndcnpB”. J o u r n a l o f small Business a n d Entrepreneurship, ii(l), 40-48.

Kao, R.W.Y. (1995). Entrepreneurship, A Wealih-creation and Value Adding Prcxess. Singapore: Prenb Hall.

Kaufimq P. J., Welsh, D. H., and Bushma& N. V. (Fall, 1995). Locus of Control and En&epreneumhip in the Russian Republic. Entrepreneurship Theov and Practice, 20 (1 X 43-56.

Kiby, P. (1971). Hunting the Heffkhunp. Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. New Yoric: Free Press.

Kilby, P. (1971). Hunting the He&dump. In Kilby, P (Ed.). Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, pp. l-40. New Yo&: Fret Preee

I&n&, H. J. (1989). Entrepreneurship in Business Development. New Yak Avebury.

lbueger, N.F. and Brazeal, D.(1994, Spring). Entrepmeurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory a&Practice, 19(3), 91-104.

Kuratko, D.F., 8c Hodgetis, R.M. (1995). Entrepreneurship, A Contemporary Approach, 3 rd Edition. New York: The Dryden Press.

L~I, thee Chee. (1995). Demographic Characteristics, Need for Achievement and Entrepreneurial Attitude among Woman Entrepreneurs and Wbpnan Managers inMalaysia. Univer&i Utara Malaysia. M. SC. Thesis.

T~~ain, J.. 1991. Young and Older Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study of Difference. Journal ofsmall Business Management, 8(4), 50-61.

Mahathk, Mohamad. 1991. Malaysia: The Way Forward. In Ahmad Saqji (Ed.), Malaysia’s Vision 2020, (pp. 401-420). Kuala Lumpur, Pelanduk

Publicaiiw.

M&mood Naztr Mohamed. (1990, February). An Ekploration of the Pemmality hfile of Small Businesa Bumiputm and Non-bumiputra Enlmpreneum.

iUalaysian Management Review, 18-27.

Mathews, C.H., and Moser, S.B. (1996, April). A Lmg&kd Investigation of the Impact of Family Background and Gender on Interest in SmalI Firm ownership. Journal ofSmart Business Management, 34(2), 29-43.

McClelland, D.C. (l%l). The Achieving Society. New York: D. Van Nostrand.

(20)

McCord, MA. (1995). Training Nee& of Pre-ventire Female Entrepreneurs. Bail stateunivlcreity. PhD. Thesis.

Md Zabid, Abdul Rashid. (1992, June-Dee.). Management Ra&es, Motivations and Problems of Male and Female winMalaysia.The Malaysian Journal ofSmall andMedium Enterprises, 3,35-46.

Miller, J. C. D. (1994). Familyoforigin and Financially Successful Male Entrepreneurs. Texas Woman’s Univmity. PhD. Thesis.

Nafbiger, D. W. and Ho&y, J.S., and Kuratko, D.F. (1994, Spring). A Pmposed Rtscarch Model of Enbrtprtnturia Motiwtion. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3),29-42.

Norcio, Ralph J. (1995). A Stzu& of a Non-traditional Entrepreneurial Popuiation as they Participated in an Entrepreneurzal Sk& Prqgramme. F%D. Thesis.

Provoa4 KP. (1993). American Indian Entrepreneurs: A Case Study (South Dakota). South Dakota State University. PhD. Thesis.

Ray, D.M.. (1993) Understanding the Entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial Attributes, Experience and Skills. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, S(4), 345-357.

Robbins, S.P. (1993). Organisation Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. Jbglewood Clifflk, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Robinson, P.B., 8c Hunt, H.K. (1992, July-Sept). Entrepreneurship and Birth Order:

Fact or Folklore. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4(3), 289- 296.

Robinson, P.B., Stimpm, D.V. , Huefim, J., & Hunt, H. K. (1991, Sumner). An Attitude Approach to the Prc&ion of Entrcprcnewship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15 (4), 19-29.

Ronstadt,R. (1984) . “Ex-a&qrenm and the Decision to Start en Entmpremeur career ((. In Homaday, J. Taapley, F. , Tinunons, J. & Vesper, K.

@&)Frontiers qf Entrepreneurship Research, I984 . We&&y, MA:

Babson Colbge.

Scherer, R.F. & James (1991). %xamin& the Relatimahip Between Perso&@

and Entrepreneurial Career Prefmce.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,3(4), 195-206.

1 3 5

(21)

Scherex, RF., Bmbimki, D.B., & Wiebe, F.A. (1990,Apil). Entrepreneur Career Selech and Gendec A So&lbation Approach. Journal ofSmall Business Management, 28 (2),37-44.

Scholtq C.P.T. (1994, April). Attitruks andPr@rences asMethodv to Di@rentiate Among Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and MaMgsrs; Successjid and Less

Success$d Entrepreneurs j&n Di#erent Economic Sectors. U&e&y of Pretoria ( south A&a)). PhD. Thesis.

Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Meth& for Business, Second Edition. New York:

John Wiley & sons, Inc.

Shanthakumar, D.K. (1993) AttitudinaZ Characteristics of Male and Female

Entrepreneurs in India and a Comparison with American Entrepreneurs.

BrighamYoungUnimsity. PhD. Thusis.

Shapero, A., and Sokol, L. (1982) “The Social Dimensions of Entmpreneumhip”. In Kent,C.A., S e x t o n , D-L., 8c Vesper K.H. @Is.), Encycbaedia o f Entrepreneurship (pp. 72-89), Englewood CKfIk, N. J. : Prentice HalI.

Shanna, S.V.S. (1979). Small Entrepreneurial Development in Some Asian Countries: A Comparative Stu&. New Delhi: Light and Lift Publisher.

Shaver, K.G. & Scott, L.R. (1991, Winter). Pemon, Process, Choice: The Psychology of New Venture Creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (21, 23-45.

Swierczek, F. W. (1994, July). Eworing Entrepreneurship Cuhures in South-Eat Asia. Journal OfEnterprising Culture, 2(Z), 687-707.

The Concise Oxjbrd Dictionary. (1990). Ed, H. W. Fowler & R.E. Allen. New York:

oxfbrduniversity Press.

Uneke, O.A. (1995). Inter-group Di$rences in Se&employment: Blacks and Chinese in Toronto (Canada). Unbemity of Toronto. PhD thesis.

Wang Gunpvu, (1990, March). The Culture of Chinese Merchants. Universi@ of HongKong, Working Paper Series No. 57, Joint Centre for Asia Pa@c Studies

Wee, C.H., L&n, W.S. & Lee, R. (1994, July-Sept.). Entreprenemhip: A Review with Further Implicatiom for Further Research. C e n t r e for Entrepreneurship, Fact& of Management, University of Toronto,

11(4X25-49.

Zainal Abdubh, G&y, F.T., and Planisek, S.L. (1995). Who are the Next Entrepreneum?. A4akysian Management JoarrnaZ, l(Z), 31-40.

Gambar

Table No. Tii p4F
Table No. LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED) Title

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

x LIST OF TABLES TABLES Table 2.1 Behavioral Factors Influencing Decision-Making of Investors Table 3.1 Types of Measurements for Personal Information Table 3.2 5-Point Likert

Mean scores and standard deviations for the variables of the study 61 Table 4.6a Mean scores and standard deviations of age 62 Table 4.6b Mean scores and standard deviations of grade

LIST OF TABLES Pages Tables 4.1 Background Of Respondent 42 Tables 4.2 Employee Engagement Mean Score For Government and Private Employee 44 Table 4.3 Job Characteristic Mean

STRESS FACTORS OF TEACHERS FROM SECONDARY SCHOOL IN IPOH BY NICHOLAS VINODH A/L ANTHONYSAMY Thesis to be submitted to Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business,

x LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Allocation for Local Authority in Terengganu from 2009-2011 3 Table 1.2 Allocation for KTCC from year 2008-2011 4 Table 2.1 FM failure on managing

LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Total number of supporting staff and their respective departments 18 Table 3.2 Original and adapted versions of benefit items 21 Table 3.3 Original and

LIST OF TABLES Tables List Page 3.1 The detail of research population 37 3.2 Questionnaire design 38 3.3 Demography Items 40 3.4 Item for leadership effectiveness 41 3.5 Item

Abstract List of Contents List of Graphs List of Tables Chapter One : Introduction Lubour mobility and unemployment: some evidence from LFS List of Contents Chapter Two :