• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Languaging and written corrective feedback in L2 writing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Languaging and written corrective feedback in L2 writing"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Languaging and written corrective feedback in L2 writing

ABSTRACT

The aim of this article is to introduce the application of languaging as the mediational tool to enhance the written corrective feedback’s effectiveness in L2 writing. Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) shows L2 learners their grammatical and ungrammatical errors in writing. It is a form of feedback that is commonly applied pedagogically in writing class. With WCF, L2 learners can improve their ability to write without errors. Nevertheless, providing WCF alone without engaging L2 learners will make the L2 learners become passive learners. They merely copy their teachers’

WCF where they can neither identify nor correct their errors. Therefore, it is recommended that L2 learners are given the opportunity to engage (to notice and understand) with the WCF.

Languaging creates the opportunity for L2 learners to engage with the teachers’ WCF. Languaging is a process where L2 learners make meaning, shape knowledge and experience through language. L2 learners use language (languaging) to solve difficult task like L2 writing. When L2 learners languaging the teachers’ WCF, they should be able to improve their writing skills. This paper has pedagogical implications in L2 writing.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This study used descriptive qualitative method in purpose to describe the types of corrective feedback used by the lecturers in writing class and to describe

This study aims at finding what kind of written corrective feedback used by the teacher in an Academic Writing class in English Department in Satya Wacana Christian

On the other hand, written corrective feedback get the excess of improving stude nts’ accuracy.. and providing a guideline with sufficient information for writing

Therefore, based on the explanation above, this study aimed at describing the type of Written Corrective Feedback by the lecturer and the students’ perception of lecturer WCF in

This present study compared three different types of corrective feedback – peer corrective feedback, teacher-written corrective feedback and video-based corrective feedback –

Keywords: ESL writing, written feedback, effective feedback Introduction Research in the area of writing has in the past decade stressed that feedback is crucial for the development

386 WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A THAI HIGHER EDUCATION CONTEXT Nattwut Jinowat nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Dusit, Bangkok 10300, Thailand

The Effect of PjBL with Oral Corrective Feedback on Student Scientific Article Writing Skills Vivi Indriyani * Universitas0Negeri0Padang, West Sumatera,0Indonesia E-mail: