• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ODRSDCE Strategic Planning 2020

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "ODRSDCE Strategic Planning 2020"

Copied!
33
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ODRSDCE STRATEGIC PLANNING 2020

(2)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BACKGROUND

History of the establishment of the office and former Deputy Rectors

01

VISION AND MISSION

02

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

The office’s ambition

03

FUNCTION

Major functions of the office

04

ORGANISATIONAL CHART

ODRSDCE organisational chart and the offices under the purview

05

STRATEGIC PLANNING

PESTEL and SWOT analysis.

strategies intiatives and ODRSDCE achievements

06

(3)

BACKGROUND 01

(4)

The office was establised way back in 1983 and the followings were the Deputy Rectors in charge of Student Affairs :

1. Ybhg. Dato’ Dr. Ariffin Suhaimi (1st August 1983 – 1st January 1993) 2. Ybhg. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Sidek Baba (1st August 1994 – 31st July 2002) 3. Ybhg. Datuk Dr. Mohd. Daud Bakar (1st October 2002 – 1st April 2005) 4. Ybhg. Dato’ Hamidon Abd. Hamid (1st April 2005 – 31st March 2009)

5. Ybhg. Prof. Dr. Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik Mahmud (1st July 2009 – 30th June 2012) 6. Ybhg. Prof. Datuk Dr. Mizan Hitam (1st September 2012 – 31st August 2017)

7. Ybhg. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shamsul Jamili Yeob (1st September 2017 – 31st August 2018)

8. Ybhg. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zulkifli Hasan (1st October 2018 – present) – Deputy Rector (Student Development and Community Engagement)

BACKGROUND

4

(5)

VISION AND

MISSION 02

(6)
(7)
(8)

FUNCTION 03

(9)
(10)

SECRETARIAT

1. Secretariat for the Student Affairs Committees.

2. Secretariat for Council of Principals.

3. Secretariat for managing the Student Development and Community Engagement report for Board of Governors.

4. Secretariat for managing the Student Development and Community

Engagement report for Senate Meeting.

PUBLIC RELATION

1. Liaise with relevant government and non-government agencies on student development and activities.

2. Preparation of necessary reports to be submitted to necessary agencies.

(11)

STRATEGIC

OBJECTIVES 04

(12)
(13)

ORGANISATIONAL

STRUCTURE 05

(14)
(15)

ORGANISATIONAL CHART

EDC

CITRA STADD

ODRSDCE FOB DSU

CCSC IWON SDC CENSERVE

(16)

Retired on 31st August 2020

(17)

STRATEGIC PLANNING

06

(18)

PESTEL ANALYSIS

POLITICAL

TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT

SOCIAL ECONOMY

LEGAL

(19)

Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun and the smallest one in the Solar System—it’s only a bit larger than our Moon. The planet’s name has nothing to do with the liquid metal since it was named after the

Roman messenger god, Mercury

NO ISSUE RISK / OPPORTUNITY

1.  POLITICAL

1) Political interference • Direct networking with alumni and former staff (opportunity)

• Factions among students (risk)

(create a harmonious student environment) (actively monitor students’ activities)

2.  ECONOMY

1) Budget cut • Cannot run planned program (risk)

(solicit own funds)

• Cannot upgrade and maintain facilities (risk) (upkeep of existing facilities)

• Lesser number of students can benefit (risk)

(ensure programmes are able to cater to all students

with minimal expenditure)

(20)

NO ISSUE IMPACT / RISK

3.  SOCIAL

1) Staffing issues

2) Less students integration

3) Increase in mental health cases among students 4) Influence of negative and deviant culture and

teachings

• Inefficient running of programs and services (risk) (diversify staff portfolio)

• Failure to achieve IIUM mission (risk)

(organize programmes that integrate students)

• Disruption in studies that affect students’ duration of study (risk)

(periodical campaigns/awareness)

• Increase of incidence related to mental illness (risk)

(identification of potential sufferers)

• More students will be influenced by the negative culture (risk)

(task force to monitor students’ affairs)

(21)

NO ISSUE IMPACT / RISK

4.  TECHNOLOGY

1) WIFI

2) Non-integrated system

3) Outdated technology (ie :STARS)

• Affect negatively work efficiency and productivity (risk)

(integration of systems to boost work output)

5.  ENVIRONMENT

1) Students accessibility to facilities 2) Provision of good facilities

• Students with disabilities are not able to partake in certain students activities (risk)

(campus upgrade)

• Increase in disruption of planned activities (risk) (explore possibilities of utilising others’ facilities)

• Jeopardize safety of users (risk)

(scrutinise viability of planned programmes)

(22)

NO ISSUE IMPACT / RISK

6.  LEGAL

1) Non compliance to UBBL 1991 Section 34 (A) and MS 1184 : 2014

2) Non adherence to university rules and regulations

• Jeopardize safety of users (risk) (ensure campus compliancy to ruling)

• Affect the implementation of the IIUM Disability Inclusion Policy (risk)

(ensure campus compliancy to ruling)

• Increase in number of disciplinary cases (risk) (establish an SDEC task force)

• Affect students’ duration of study when

punishment is being imposed (risk)

(explore other forms of punitive actions)

(23)

SWOT ANALYSIS

1.

Dedicated and experienced staff

2.

Experts in niche are (debate, sports, entrepreneurship counseling and career, community services

3.

Internationally and nationally recognised students’ achievements

1.

Establish more industrial collaboration

2.

Promoting internal expertise to generate income and strengthen visibility

3.

Establish engagement with the surrounding IIUM Community

1.

Shortage of competent staff in certain areas (clinical area)

2.

Insufficient funds to maintain and upgrade facilities

3.

Non-integration of IT support system

1.

Increase in mental health cases among IIUM students

2.

Diminishing Islamic image among IIUM graduates

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

(24)

STRATEGIES TO ACHIEVE – STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

S1

Establish and enhance services that support academic development as well as students’ spiritual, physical and overall wellbeing

Enrich students’

S2

experience and performance by providing adequate physical space, facilities and equipment that ensure safe and conducive environments

S3

Develop students’ Islamic character, international outlook, marketability, entrepreneurial skills and positive leadership qualities through on and off campus learning programmes Promote community engagement

S4

as well as a culture of professionalism in respect of students’ self-image, attitude, skills, knowledge and social ethics

(25)

Percentage of students satisfied with the support services for development

of spiritual, physical, mental and overall

wellbeing

60%

S1 Establish and enhance services that support academic development as well as students’ spiritual,

physical and overall wellbeing

INDICATOR TARGET

1. Survey to be answered by all students (1

academic year) 2. Number of

improvements implemented

INITIATIVES/PLANNING

(26)

ANALYSIS

INITIATIVES PIC TARGET

COMPLETION

Survey to be answered by all

students ODRSDCE December 2020

Number of improvements

implemented ODRSDCE Q1 2021

(27)

Percentage of students that feel IIUM has provided adequate physical space,

facilities and equipment ensuring safe and conducive environments

(rated 4 and above)

60%

S2 Enrich students’ experience and performance by providing adequate physical space, facilities and

equipment that ensure safe and conducive environments

INDICATOR TARGET

1. Introduce new facilities / upgrade new existing

facilities

2. Introduce new credited COCU / programmes 3. Ensuring compliance

to OSH and other statutory requirements

INITIATIVES/PLANNING

(28)

ANALYSIS

INITIATIVES PIC TARGET

COMPLETION

Introduce new facilities / upgrade of

existing facilities SDC, STADD Q1 2021 Introduce new

credited COCU /

programmes STADD Q1 2021

Ensuring compliance to OSH and other

statutory requirements

ODRSDCE Q1 2021

(29)

1. Percentage of students employed by multi- national companies

2. Percentage of students exposed to structured entrepreneurship curriculum and co-curriculum 3. Number of Strategic Industrial Engagement on Graduate Employability (North and South – Heavy

and Engineering Industries)

4. Percentage of graduating students (final semester) participating in the Fly High programme 5. Number of students who obtained recognitions /

awards at national and international level

1. 25%

2. 80%

3. 6 engagements

4. 60%

5. 500 students

S3 Develop students’ Islamic character, international outlook, marketability, entrepreneurial skills and positive leadership

qualities through on and off campus learning programmes

INDICATOR TARGET

1. Organise special programmes and industrial engagement locally and internationally for graduating students 2. Organise Entrepreneurship Acculturation

programmes

3. Strategic collaboration with Industries 4. Strategic collaboration with K/C/D/I/OM 5. Organise workshops and programmes for

students achievements

INITIATIVES/PLANNING

(30)

ANALYSIS

INITIATIVES PIC TARGET COMPLETION

Organise special programmes and industrial engagement locally and internationally for

graduating students

CCSC December 2019

Organise Entrepreneurship

Acculturation programmes EDC December 2019

Strategic collaboration with

Industries and K/C/D/I/O/M CCSC December 2019 Organise workshops and

programmes for students achievements

All offices under

the purview December 2019

(31)

1. Number of community engagement programmes organised

2. Percentage of involvement in University Social Responsibility (BUDI / Waqf Time) projects 3. Number of programmes geared towards SDG

1. 250 programmes 2. Staff – 10%, students -

3. 250 programmes25%

S4 Promote community engagement as well as a culture of professionalism in respect of students’ self-image,

attitude, skills, knowledge and social ethics

INDICATOR TARGET

1. Ensure all programmes are geared toward SDG

2. Organise and collaborate programmes with relevant authorities

INITIATIVES/PLANNING

(32)

ANALYSIS

INITIATIVES PIC TARGET COMPLETION

Ensure all programmes are

geared toward SDG All offices under

the purview December 2019 Organise and collaborate

programmes with relevant

authorities All offices December 2019

(33)

THANKS

ODRSDCE

@odrsdce

www.iium.edu.my/office/odrsdce

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Even if traditional planning was to be regarded as the opposite of strategic planning; it should not be implied that traditional planning does not considered some of

CONCLUSION This study aimed to assess the critical effects relationship between the strategic planning process and innovation strategies towards furniture firm’s performance to come

Figure 2.6 - Evaluation of Business Strategy TRIGGER • Change in organisational processes as result of IT • Strategic planning and formulation process CONSISTENCY • Coordination

In order to achieve this aim the following aspects will be covered: J knowledge as a strategic corporate resource in enterprises; J the different opinions/viewpoints/models with

In order to achieve this aim the following aspects will be covered: J knowledge as a strategic corporate resource in enterprises; J the different opinions/viewpoints/models with

The policy statements in the strategic plan that provided general direction for the development of RTS corridor goals, objectives, and performance measures are listed below: •

iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1 Cost/Benefit Analysis for the “Basic” Strategic Planning Model………...4 Table 2 Ranking the Operational Objectives and Assigning Relative

Learning Objectives 2 of 2 1.5 Describe the basic model of strategic management and its components 1.6 Identify some common triggering events that act as stimuli for strategic change