BAR No. 1
1 2 7=(3+4+5+6) 8 9 10 11 12=(8+9+10+11) 13= 7 - 12 14
Part A I. Operations
MFO 1 : HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES
Performance Indicator 1 : Total number of graduates in
mandated priority programs 5280 0 6198
676 6874 -1594
Accomplishment is above the Target. (-) is due to theapplication of the formula provided in the report;
Graduates as of Sept. 2016;
117.69% 161.59% 125.52% 143.00%
430.10% -312.41%
(51.89%/ 44.09%) ((83.33%)/(
51.57%))
((33.33%+77.7 8%+81.82%)/(
31.88%+44.59
%+77.24%))
((87.39%+75
%)/(62.5%+
51.06%))
68.52% 0.00% 80.43%
8.77% 89.20% -20.69%
(5280/7706) (6198/7706) (676/7706)
MFO 2 : ADVANCED EDUCATION SERVICES
Performance Indicator 1 : Total number of
graduates in mandated and priority programs 86
119 119 -33
Accomplishment is above the Target. (-) is due to the application of the formula provided in the report; Graduates as of Sept. 2016: 20 local and 99 international
100.0%
N/A N/A N/A
(86/86)
82.35%
N/A N/A N/A
(280/340) MFO 3 : RESEARCH SERVICES
REMARKS 1ST
QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD Quarter
QUARTERLY PHYSICAL REPORT OF OPERATION
As of September 30, 2016
Particulars
UACS CODE
PHYSICAL
TARGETS (2016) PHYSICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS (2016)
Variance as of 09/30/2016 4TH
QUARTER Total
Performance Indicator 2 : Average percentage passing in licensure exams by SUC graduates/ national average % passing in board programs covered by SUC
Accomplishment is above the Target. (-) is due to the application of the formula provided in the report;
Licensure results in: BEEd, Electronics Eng., Civil Eng., Nursing, Mechanical Eng., and Architecture Licensure exams.
Performance Indicator 3 : Percentage of graduates who finished their academic programs according to the prescribed timeframe.
Accomplishment is above the Target. (-) is due to the application of the formula provided in the report;
Graduates as of Sept. 2016;
Total 2016 Target
Performance Indicator 2 : Percentage of graduates who engaged in employment or whose employment status improved within 1 year of graduation
Survey conducted during 1st and 2nd Trimesters of the SY
Performance Indicator 3 : Percentage of students who rate timeliness of education delivery/ supervision as good or better
Survey conducted during 1st and 2nd Trimesters of the SY
Performance Indicator 1 : Number of research
studies completed in the last 3 years 86
9 7 9 25 61
100%
19.57% 15.22% 19.57% 54.35% 45.65%
(46/46) (9/46) (7/46) (9/46) (25/46) (21/46)
48.84%
3.49% 0.00% 0.00% 3.49% 45.35%
One (1) ISI-recognized; Two (2) Google Scholar andother open access journals
(42/86) (3/86) (3/86) (39/86)
MFO 4 : EXTENSION SERVICES
Performance Indicator 1 : Number of persons trained
weighted by length of training 8050
2025 1994 3205.5 7224.5 825.5
95%
15.95% 5.71% 13.33% 35.00% 60.00%
(399/420)
(67/420) (24/420) (56/420) (147/420) (252/420)
81.08%
41.35% 4.32% 19.46% 65.14% 15.95%
(300/370)
(153/370) (16/370) (72/370) (241/370) (59/370)
Prepared by:
NICOLO B. VELASCO
Director, Planning and Development Office
Date:Performance Indicator 3 : Percentage of
trainees/clients who rate services rendered as good or better
NENITA B. CHICO CECILIA N. GASCON, Ph.D.
Budget Officer SUC President III
Performance Indicator 2 : Percentage of research projects conducted or completed on schedule
Performance Indicator 3 : Percentage of research outputs published in a recognized refereed journal or submitted for patenting/ patented
Performance Indicator 2 : Percentage of requests for training/technical advice responded to within 3 days of request
