• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ÁßÕß§™“μ'„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™'π√“™ æ'…≥ÿ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "ÁßÕß§™“μ'„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™'π√“™ æ'…≥ÿ"

Copied!
11
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

π‘æπ∏åμâπ©∫—∫

Original Article

Ú˜˜

∫∑§—¥¬àÕ ¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“쑇ªìπ¡–‡√Áß∑’Ëæ∫‰¥â§àÕπ¢â“ßπâÕ¬ ºŸâπ‘æπ∏剥â√«∫√«¡√“¬ß“π°“√√—°…“μ—Èß·μà¡°√“§¡ 2544

∂÷ß ∏—π«“§¡ 2554 ¬âÕπÀ≈—߇ªìπ‡«≈“ 11 ªï ¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ëμ‘¥μ“¡‡«™√–‡∫’¬π‰¥â 102 √“¬ ‚¥¬‰¥â∑”°“√»÷°…“‡™‘ß æ√√≥π“«‘‡§√“–Àå¬âÕπÀ≈—ß æ∫«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬¡’Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ 59.59 ªï  à«π„À≠à¡“æ∫·æ∑¬å¥â«¬°âÕπ‡π◊ÈÕ·≈–·º≈∑’Ë Õ«—¬«–‡æ» ºŸâªÉ«¬√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥ partial penectomy √âÕ¬≈– 67.6 ·≈– total penectomy √âÕ¬≈– 26.5 º≈°“√

μ√«®∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ™π‘¥ well differentiated √âÕ¬≈– 52, moderately differentiated √âÕ¬≈– 39.2 ·≈–

poorly differentiated √âÕ¬≈– 6.9 ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫¡’√âÕ¬≈– 52.9 ¡’°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫√âÕ¬≈– 47.1 ‚¥¬√–¬–‡«≈“‡©≈’ˬ¢Õß°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬§◊Õ 3.56 ‡¥◊Õπ

‚¥¬√–¬–‡«≈“·æ√à°√–®“¬À≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘π“π∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 15 ‡¥◊Õπ ªí®®—¬∑’Ë¡’º≈‡°’ˬ«¢âÕßμàÕ°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ æ∫‡æ’¬ßªí®®—¬‡¥’¬«§◊Õ≈”¥—∫¢—Èπ§«“¡√ÿπ·√ß∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√Áß(tumor differentiation)  à«πÕ“¬ÿ·≈–°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’Ë (T stage) ‰¡à¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—π ªí®®—¬∑’Ë¡’·π«‚π⡇ªìπ Õ¬à“߬‘ËßμàÕ°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊ÕßÕ’°ª√–°“√§◊Õ °“√μ√«®æ∫ tumor emboli „π∑àÕ∑“߇¥‘ππÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õß·≈–„πÀ≈Õ¥‡≈◊Õ¥¥” (lymphatic and venous embolization) ‚¥¬ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’ªí®®—¬‡ ’ˬßμàÕ°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫  ¡§«√‰¥â√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ÕÕ° (inguinal lymphadenec- tomy) ∑—π∑’‚¥¬‰¡àμâÕß√Õ„Àâμ√«®æ∫μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ

§” ”§—≠: ¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘, °“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫, °“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™

æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈°: ªí®®—¬∑’Ë¡’º≈μàÕ°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

æß…å»—°¥‘Ï  “√‡®√‘≠

°≈ÿà¡ß“π»—≈¬°√√¡ ‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈°

∫∑π”

¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘æ∫‰¥âπâÕ¬ª√–¡“≥√âÕ¬≈– 2 ¢Õß

¡–‡√Áß√–∫∫¬Ÿ‚√«‘∑¬“(1) ‚¥¬¡’Õÿ∫—μ‘°“√≥å·μ°μà“ß°—π‰ª

„π·μà≈– à«π¢Õß‚≈° ‡™àπ„π∫“ß à«π¢Õ߇Շ™’¬ Õ—ø√‘°“

·≈–Õ‡¡√‘°“„μâ ®– Ÿß∂÷ß 19 √“¬μàÕª√–™“°√™“¬

100,000 §π ·≈–æ∫πâÕ¬„π¬ÿ‚√ª·≈– À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“‡æ’¬ß 0.1-0.9 μàÕª√–™“°√™“¬ 100,000 §π(2) „πª√–‡∑»

‰∑¬ æ.». 2544-2546 ¡’Õÿ∫—μ‘°“√≥å (Age - Standard- ized Incidence Rate) 1.2 μàÕª√–™“°√™“¬ 100,000

§π(3) ‡™◊ËÕ«à“¿“«– ÿ¢Õπ“¡—¬·≈–¿“«–Àπ—ßÀÿ⡪≈“¬

Õß§™“쑉¡à‡ªî¥®–‡ªì𠓇Àμÿ ”§—≠(4) ‚¥¬ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à

‰¥â√—∫°“√√—°…“¡—°®–‡ ’¬™’«‘μ¿“¬„π 2 ªï ®“°°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡

Õ¬à“ß§«∫§ÿ¡‰¡à‰¥â¢Õß√Õ¬‚√§„πμ”·ÀπàßÕß§™“μ‘ ·≈–

Õ«—¬«–¢â“߇§’¬ß ·≈–°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªÕ«—¬«–Õ◊Ëπ °“√

(2)

√—°…“¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘∑’ˉ¥âº≈¥’§◊Õ°“√μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘ÕÕ°

∫“ß à«πÀ√◊Õ∑—ÈßÀ¡¥ „Àâ‡À≈◊Õ‡π◊ÈÕ¥’Àà“ß®“°μ”·Àπàß

¡–‡√Áß 2 ‡´π쑇¡μ√(1) √à«¡°—∫°“√æ‘®“√≥“ºà“μ—¥

‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß∑’Ë¢“Àπ’∫·≈–Õ“®æ‘®“√≥“‡≈“–

μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß„πÕÿâ߇™‘ß°√“πÕÕ°¥â«¬

ªí®®—¬ ”§—≠∑’Ë®–∑”„Àâ°“√√—°…“ºŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√Áß Õß§™“쑉¥â√—∫§«“¡ ”‡√Á®¥’À√◊Õ‰¡à ¢÷ÈπÕ¬Ÿà°—∫°“√§«∫§ÿ¡

°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¢Õß‚√§‰ª¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

‚¥¬∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“∑’ËμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“

Àπ’∫®–¡’Õ—μ√“°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï √âÕ¬≈– 71-95 ·μà ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“∑’ËμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫®–

¡’Õ—μ√“°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï √âÕ¬≈– 28(5,6)  à«π°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªÕ«—¬«–∑’ËÀà“߉°≈¡—°®–‡°‘¥„π√–¬–∑⓬¢Õß‚√§

·≈–¡—°æ∫„πºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª∑’ËμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–„πÕÿâ߇™‘ß°√“π·≈â«(7) ¥—ßπ—Èπ°“√

μ‘¥μ“¡‡ΩÑ“√–«—ß°“√°√–®“¬¢Õß¡–‡√Á߉ª¬—ßμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫À≈—ß®“°°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘ÕÕ°®÷߇ªìπ  ‘Ëß ”§—≠ ‚¥¬®–μâÕßμ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡¿“«–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

¢“Àπ’∫‚μ∑ÿ° 3 ‡¥◊Õππ“π 2 ªï ∑ÿ° 4 ‡¥◊Õπ„πªï∑’Ë 3 ∑ÿ°

6 ‡¥◊Õπ„πªï∑’Ë 4 ·≈–μàÕ‰ªªï≈–§√—Èß„πªï∑’Ë 5(1,7) ·μà„π

°“√»÷°…“μàÕ¡“æ∫«à“°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

¢“Àπ’∫À≈—ß®“°°“√μ√«®æ∫«à“μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μπ—Èπ ºŸâªÉ«¬®–¡’Õ—μ√“°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï√âÕ¬≈– 36 ‡¡◊ËÕ‡∑’¬∫

°—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß∑—π∑’‚¥¬‰¡à√Õ„ÀâμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ ºŸâªÉ«¬®–¡’Õ—μ√“°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï

√âÕ¬≈– 83(7) πÕ°®“°π’Ȱ“√μ√«®μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ‚¥¬

„™âÕ“°“√∑“ß§≈‘π‘°¬—ß¡’§«“¡‰¡à·πàπÕπ ‚¥¬∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë μ√«®æ∫«à“μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ æ∫«à“‡¡◊ËÕμ√«®™‘Èπ‡π◊ÈÕ

∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“®–¡’º≈≈∫√âÕ¬≈– 33 ·μຟâªÉ«¬∑’Ëμ√«®

‰¡àæ∫μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ®–¡’º≈∫«°∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“√âÕ¬≈–

20(8) ®÷ß¡’º≈°“√»÷°…“∑’Ë·π–π”„Àâ∑”°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–

μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ „π√“¬∑’Ë¡’§«“¡‡ ’ˬ߂¥¬‰¡à√Õ„Àâ μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ(9) ·μà¢âÕ·π–π”¥—ß°≈à“«°Á¡’¢âÕ‚μâ

·¬â߇π◊ËÕß®“°°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ®–¡’

¿“«–·∑√°´âÕπÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥‰¥â ‡™àπ ¿“«–πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß§—Ëß„μâ

·º≈ºà“μ—¥ (lymphocele) ¿“«–‡π◊ÈÕª“°·º≈ºà“μ—¥‡πà“

쓬®“°°“√¢“¥‡≈◊Õ¥¡“‡≈’È¬ß (flap necrosis) ¿“«–

¢“∫«¡®“°°“√§—ËßπÈ”‡À≈◊Õß (lymphedema) ·μà ªí®®ÿ∫—π°Á‰¥â¡’°“√æ—≤π“‡∑§π‘§°“√ºà“μ—¥‡æ◊ËÕ≈¥¿“«–

·∑√°´âÕπ„ÀâπâÕ¬≈ß

°“√¥”‡π‘π‚√§¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘π—Èπ √Õ¬‚√§®–

‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ∑’Ëμ”·Àπàߪ≈“¬Õß§™“μ‘ (glans penis) À√◊Õ„μâ Àπ—ßÀÿâ¡Õ«—¬«–‡æ» (prepuce)(1,7) ‚¥¬„π√–¬–·√°®–

‡μ‘∫‚μÕ¬à“ß™â“ Ê „π√–¥—∫μ◊Èπ μàÕ¡“‡¡◊ËÕ√Õ¬‚√§≈ÿ°≈“¡≈÷°

≈߉ª„πÕß§™“μ‘ °Á®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õß·≈–Õ«—¬«–Õ◊Ëπ ´÷Ëß∫“ß§√—Èß√Õ¬‚√§¡’¢π“¥‡≈Á° Àπ—ß Àÿ⡪≈“¬Õß§™“쑉¡à‡ªî¥ ºŸâªÉ«¬√Ÿâ ÷°Õ—∫Õ“¬ √Ÿâ ÷°°≈—««à“

®–‡ªìπ‚√§√⓬ §«“¡‰¡à√Ÿâ °“√≈–‡≈¬μàÕ ÿ¢¿“«– °“√

«‘π‘®©—¬‚√§º‘¥æ≈“¥‡ªìπ°“√μ‘¥‡™◊ÈÕ ∑”„À⺟âªÉ«¬¡“æ∫

·æ∑¬å»—≈¬°√√¡√–∫∫ªí  “«–≈à“™â“ ‚¥¬¡“μàÕ‡¡◊ËÕ‚√§

≈ÿ°≈“¡‰ª¡“° À√◊Õ¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫‚μ·≈â« ´÷Ëß

√–¬–‡«≈“¥—ß°≈à“«Õ“®π“π°«à“ 1 ªïπ—∫·μà‡°‘¥‚√§(10)

°“√»÷°…“π’È¡’«—μ∂ÿª√– ß§å‡æ◊ËÕ»÷°…“¥â“π√–∫“¥

«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ ·≈–ªí®®—¬∑’Ë¡’º≈μàÕ°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ‚¥¬æ‘®“√≥“«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬

°≈ÿà¡„¥§«√‰¥â√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

À≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘∑—π∑’ À√◊Õ°≈ÿà¡„¥§«√√Õ„Àâμ√«®

æ∫μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ®÷ß√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥ ∑—Èßπ’ȇæ◊ËÕ‡æ‘Ë¡

Õ—μ√“°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’ ‚Õ°“  Ÿß∑’Ë®–‡°‘¥°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß ·≈–≈¥°“√ºà“μ—¥∑’ˉ¡à

®”‡ªìπÕ—π®–∑”„À⇰‘¥º≈·∑√°´âÕπÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥·°àºŸâªÉ«¬

∑’Ë¡’‚Õ°“ πâÕ¬∑’Ë®–‡°‘¥°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

«‘∏’°“√»÷°…“

‡ªìπ°“√»÷°…“‡™‘ßæ√√≥π“·∫∫¬âÕπÀ≈—ß (retro- spective descriptive study) ‚¥¬»÷°…“¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈ºŸâªÉ«¬

∑ÿ°√“¬∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√«‘π‘®©—¬«à“‡ªìπ¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ ·≈–

‡¢â“√—∫°“√√—°…“„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈°

„π™à«ß√–¬–‡«≈“ 11 ªï μ—Èß·μà¡°√“§¡ 2544 ∂÷ß∏—π«“§¡

2554 ®”π«π 102 √“¬ ‚¥¬¥Ÿ®“°∫—π∑÷°‡«™√–‡∫’¬π

(3)

«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ Úıı ˆ ªï∑’Ë ÚÚ ©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú

Ú˜˘

ºŸâªÉ«¬πÕ°·≈–ºŸâªÉ«¬„π ·≈–«‘‡§√“–Àå¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈‡ªìπ Õß

¢—ÈπμÕπ ‚¥¬¢—ÈπμÕπ·√°‡ªìπ°“√»÷°…“‡™‘ßæ√√≥π“ ‚¥¬

°“√«‘‡§√“–Àå¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈ºŸâªÉ«¬∑ÿ°√“¬‡°’ˬ«°—∫ Õ“¬ÿ Õ“™’æ  ∂“π¿“æ ¡√  ¿Ÿ¡‘≈”‡π“ Õ“°“√ ”§—≠∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬¡“æ∫

·æ∑¬å  ∂“π¿“æ¢ÕßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·√°√—∫

™π‘¥°“√ºà“μ—¥ º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√Áß √–¬–

‡«≈“∑’ËμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥ °“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ √–¬–‡«≈“∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬¡“μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡

 “‡Àμÿ∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬ ‘Èπ ÿ¥°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡ ‚¥¬π—∫®”π«π

§«“¡∂’Ë√âÕ¬≈–  à«π‡∫’ˬ߇∫π¡“μ√∞“π

¢—ÈπμÕπ∑’Ë Õ߇ªìπ°“√»÷°…“‡™‘ß«‘‡§√“–À凪√’¬∫

‡∑’¬∫ (analytic study) ‚¥¬»÷°…“ªí®®—¬μà“ßÊ∑’Ë¡’º≈μàÕ

°“√°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ Õ—π‰¥â·°à Õ“¬ÿ

≈”¥—∫§«“¡√ÿπ·√ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√Áß (tumor differ- entiation) °“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’ËÕß§™“μ‘ (T stage)

∑¥ Õ∫§«“¡πà“‡™◊ËÕ∂◊Õ‚¥¬ Pearsonûs chi-square, Fisherûs exact test, one-way ANOVA, t-test ‚¥¬ p- value < 0.05 ∂◊Õ«à“¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘ ·≈–∑¥ Õ∫

 —¥ à«π§«“¡‡ ’ˬßμàÕ°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

¥â«¬ Odds ratio (OR) ∑’Ë 95% confidence interval (95% CI) ‚¥¬§à“μË” ÿ¥·≈–§à“ Ÿß ÿ¥¡“°°«à“ 1 ∂◊Õ«à“

¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘

º≈°“√»÷°…“

μ—Èß·μà‡¥◊Õπ¡°√“§¡ 2544 ∂÷ß ∏—π«“§¡ 2554 √–¬–

‡«≈“√«¡ 11 ªï ¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬‰¥â√—∫°“√«‘π‘®©—¬«à“‡ªìπ¡–‡√Áß Õß§™“μ‘ 102 √“¬ ‚¥¬¡’¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈∫ÿ§§≈¥—ßμ“√“ß∑’Ë 1

ºŸâªÉ«¬ à«π„À≠à¡’¿Ÿ¡‘≈”‡π“Õ¬Ÿà„π®—ßÀ«—¥æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈° 55

√“¬ (53.9%) √Õß≈ß¡“§◊Õ °”·æß‡æ™√ 15 √“¬ (14.7%) Õ—π¥—∫ 3 §◊Õ ‡æ™√∫Ÿ√≥å 10 √“¬ (9.8%) Õ—π¥—∫∂—¥‰ª§◊Õ  ÿ‚¢∑—¬ 8 √“¬ (7.8%) æ‘®‘μ√ 7 √“¬ (6.9%) μ“° 5 √“¬

(4.9%) ¥â“πÕ“™’æ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬æ∫«à“ ‰¡à¡’Õ“™’æÀ√◊Õ‰¡à√–∫ÿ 40 √“¬ (39.2%) ‡°…μ√°√√¡ 34 √“¬ (33.3%) ¥â“π  ∂“π¿“æ°“√ ¡√  ºŸâªÉ«¬ ¡√ ·≈â« 92 √“¬ (90.2%)

¥â“πÕ“¬ÿ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬ æ∫«à“ ¡—∏¬∞“π 61.50 ªï æ‘ —¬ 27 -

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 1 ¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈ à«π∫ÿ§§≈¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√ÁßÕ«—¬«–‡æ»™“¬ ªï æ.». 2544-2554 (n = 102 √“¬)

¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈ à«π∫ÿ§§≈ ®”π«π √âÕ¬≈–

¿Ÿ¡‘≈”‡π“

°”·æß‡æ™√ 15 14.7

μ“° 5 4.9

æ‘®‘μ√ 7 6.9

æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈° 55 53.9

‡æ™√∫Ÿ√≥å 10 9.8

 ÿ‚¢∑—¬ 8 7.8

Õ◊Ëπ Ê 2 2.0

Õ“™’æ

‡°…μ√°√√¡ 34 33.3

§â“¢“¬ 1 1.0

π—°∫«™ 2 2.0

√—∫®â“ß 23 22.5

√—∫√“™°“√ 1 1.0

Õ◊Ëπ Ê 1 1.0

‰¡à√–∫ÿ 40 39.2

 ∂“π¿“æ ¡√ 

 ¡√  92 90.1

‚ ¥ 6 5.9

À¡â“¬ 1 1.0

À¬à“ 1 1.0

‰¡à√–∫ÿ 2 2.0

Õ“¬ÿ

§à“‡©≈’ˬ 59.59 ªï, ¡—∏¬∞“π 61.50 ªï, ∞“ππ‘¬¡ 66 ªï  à«π‡∫’ˬ߇∫π¡“μ√∞“π 12.92 ªï, æ‘ —¬ 54 ªï, πâÕ¬∑’Ë ÿ¥ 27 ªï, ¡“°∑’Ë ÿ¥ 81 ªï

81 ªï Õ“¬ÿ∑’Ë 25-75 ‡ªÕ√凴Áπμå‰∑≈å§◊Õ 48.75-68.50 ªï

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 2 · ¥ß¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈∑“ß§≈‘π‘°¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬

‡¡◊ËÕæ‘®“√≥“°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

æ∫«à“¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬ 54 √“¬ (53%) ∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬

‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õßμ≈Õ¥°“√»÷°…“ ·≈–¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬ 48 √“¬

(47%) ∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß ‚¥¬¡’§à“

(4)

À≈—ߺà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘®–μâÕßπ—¥μ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬ ´÷Ëß„π ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë»÷°…“¡’√–¬–‡«≈“°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡‡©≈’ˬ

18.48 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 21.63) πâÕ¬∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 1 ‡¥◊Õπ π“π

∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 8 ªï 7 ‡¥◊Õπ  “‡Àμÿ∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬æâπ®“°°“√»÷°…“

¡“°∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ‰¡à¡“μ“¡π—¥ 50 √“¬ (49.0%) ‚¥¬¡’√–¬–

°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡°àÕπ®–‰¡à¡“μ“¡π—¥‡©≈’ˬ 10.56 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 12.40) ·≈–√–¬–‡«≈“∑’Ëπ“π∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 4 ªï 4

‡¥◊Õπ°àÕπ‰¡à¡“ ‚¥¬‡ªìπºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬

‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß 30 √“¬ §‘¥‡ªìπ√âÕ¬≈– 60 ¢Õß ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë ‰¡à¡“μ“¡π—¥ ·≈–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß 20 √“¬§‘¥‡ªìπ√âÕ¬≈– 40 ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡“

μ“¡π—¥ º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿࡉ¡à¡“μ“¡π—¥

‡ªìπ carcinoma in situ 1 √“¬ (2%) well differen- tiated carcinoma 30 √“¬ (60%) moderately differen tiated carcinoma 15 √“¬ (30%) poorly differen- tiated carcinoma 4 √“¬ (8%) ´÷ËßÕ—μ√“ à«π„°≈â

‡§’¬ß°—∫ºŸâªÉ«¬∑—ÈßÀ¡¥∑’Ë»÷°…“ ·¡â«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬∫“ß√“¬®–

‡§¬¢“¥π—¥μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡‰ª°àÕπÀπâ“®–¡’¿“«–μàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫‚μ ·μà‡¡◊ËÕ‡°‘¥¿“«–¥—ß°≈à“«¢÷Èπ ºŸâªÉ«¬

°Á®–∂Ÿ° àß°≈—∫¡“√—°…“¬—ß‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™

‡π◊ËÕß®“° ∂“πæ¬“∫“≈Õ◊Ëπ¬—߉¡à¡’·æ∑¬å‡©æ“–∑“ß  ‘Èπ ÿ¥°“√»÷°…“‚¥¬∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬¬—ß§ß¡“μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡Õ¬Ÿà 31 √“¬ (30.4%) ºŸâªÉ«¬√–¬– ÿ¥∑⓬ (end stage) ∂Ÿ°

 à߉ª√—°…“·∫∫ª√–§—∫ª√–§Õ߬—ß‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈„°≈â∫â“π 15 √“¬ (14.7%) ‡ ’¬™’«‘μ„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ 6

√“¬ (5.9%) ‚¥¬∑’Ë 2 √“¬‡ ’¬™’«‘μ®“°¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘

∑’ˇÀ≈◊Õ‡ ’¬™’«‘μ®“°‚√§Õ◊Ëπ Ê

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 3 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ßÕ“¬ÿ·≈–º≈

∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ æ∫«à“Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ¢Õß ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’˺≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ carcinoma in situ §◊Õ 66.50 ªï °≈ÿà¡∑’˺≈‡ªìπ well differentiated carcinoma

§◊Õ 59.60 ªï °≈ÿà¡∑’˺≈‡ªìπ moderately differentiated carcinoma §◊Õ 57.98 ªï °≈ÿà¡∑’˺≈‡ªìπpoorly differen- tiated carcinoma §◊Õ 66.71 ªï ‡¡◊ËÕ∑¥ Õ∫§à“‡©≈’ˬ

¢ÕßÕ“¬ÿ·μà≈–°≈ÿࡥ⫬ one-way ANOVA æ∫«à“‰¡à¡’

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 2 ¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈∑“ß§≈‘π‘°¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√ÁßÕ«—¬«–‡æ»™“¬ ªï æ.».

2544-2554 (n = 102 √“¬)

¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈∑“ß§≈‘π‘° ®”π«π √âÕ¬≈–

Õ“°“√ ”§—≠

μ‘¥‡™◊ÈÕª≈“¬Õ«—¬«–‡æ» 11 10.8

°âÕπ‡π◊ÈÕßÕ° 47 46.1

·º≈ 44 43.1

°“√ºà“μ—¥

Partial penectomy 69 67.6

Total penectomy 27 26.5

Wide excision 6 5.9

º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√Áß

Carcinoma in situ 2 2

Well differentiated 53 52

Moderately differentiated 40 39.1

Poorly differentiated 7 6.9

欓∏‘ ¿“æμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

‰¡à¡’¿“«–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ 54 53

μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ·√°√—∫ 18 17.6

¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘ 30 29.4

¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡ Corpus Cavernosum

‰¡à¡’ 69 67.6

¡’ 33 32.4

¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡ Urethra

‰¡à¡’ 83 81.4

¡’ 19 18.6

°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

‰¡à¡’ 69 67.6

¡’ 33 32.4

‡©≈’ˬ√–¬–‡«≈“∑’˰√–®“¬‰ª 3.56 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 4.237) §à“

πâÕ¬∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 0 ‡¥◊Õπ ´÷ËßÀ¡“¬∂÷ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ‡¡◊ËÕ

·√°√—∫ ·≈–π“π∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 15 ‡¥◊Õπ ·μà‡¡◊ËÕμ—¥ºŸâªÉ«¬

∑’Ë¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ·√°√—∫ÕÕ° æ∫«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬ 30 √“¬

(29.4%) ∑’ËμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘ ®–¡’

√–¬–‡«≈“‡©≈’ˬ 5.70 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 4.061)

(5)

«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ Úıı ˆ ªï∑’Ë ÚÚ ©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú

Ú¯Ò

§«“¡·μ°μà“ß°—π (p 0.348)

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 4 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–Õ“¬ÿ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬

æ∫«à“°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‚¥¬√«¡∑—Èß°√≥’∑’Ë¡’°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬·≈⫇¡◊ËÕ·√°√—∫·≈–¿“¬À≈—ߺà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘

®”π«π 48 √“¬ ¡’Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ 57.04 ªï (SD 12.50)  à«π

°≈ÿà¡∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬ 54 √“¬¡’Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ 61.85 ªï (SD 12.98) ‡¡◊ËÕ∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ t-test æ∫«à“‰¡à¡’§«“¡

·μ°μà“ß√–À«à“ßÕ“¬ÿºŸâªÉ«¬∑—Èß Õß°≈ÿà¡ (p 0.060)

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 5 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“

æ∫«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ well differen- tiated carcinoma 53 √“¬ ®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß 16 √“¬ (30.2%) ‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬

37 √“¬ (69.8%) ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ mo- derately differentiated carcinoma 40 √“¬ ®–¡’°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß 26 √“¬ (65%) ‰¡à¡’°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬ 14 √“¬ (35%) ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘

«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ poorly differentiated carcinoma 7 √“¬

®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß 6 √“¬ (85.7%)

‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬ 1 √“¬ (14.3%)  à«π carcinoma in situ ®”π«π 2 √“¬ ‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß ‡π◊ËÕß®“°‡ªìπ¡–‡√Áß∑’Ë¡’§«“¡√ÿπ·√ßμË” ‡¡◊ËÕ

∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ Fisherûs exact test æ∫«à“¡’§«“¡·μ°- μà“ß°—πÕ¬à“ß¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘ (p < 0.001) ·≈–‡¡◊ËÕ

‡ª√’¬∫‡∑’¬∫§«“¡‡ ’ˬßμàÕ°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õß®“°§à“ OR ‚¥¬‡ª√’¬∫‡∑’¬∫°—∫ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡’º≈

∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ well differentiated carcinoma æ∫«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ moderately differentiated carcinoma ®–¡’§à“ OR 4.299 (95%

CI 1.790, 10.305) ·≈–ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘

«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ poorly differentiated carcinoma ®–¡’§à“

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 3 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å¢ÕßÕ“¬ÿ·≈–º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ (n=102 √“¬)

º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“ ®”π«πºŸâªÉ«¬ (√“¬) Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ (ªï)  à«π‡∫’ˬ߇∫π¡“μ√∞“π (ªï) p-value

Carcinoma in situ 2 66.50 0.71 0.348*

Well differentiated 53 59.60 13.60

Moderately differentiated 40 57.98 12.16

Poorly differentiated 7 66.71 12.38

Total 102 59.59 12.92

*∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ one-way ANOVA

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 4 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–Õ“¬ÿ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ (n=102 √“¬)

°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

p-value

¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬ ‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬

§à“‡©≈’ˬՓ¬ÿ (ªï) 57.04 61.85 0.060*

®”π«π 48 54

 à«π‡∫’ˬ߇∫π¡“μ√∞“π (ªï) 12.50 12.98

*∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ t-test

√«¡ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫∑—È߇¡◊ËÕ·√°√—∫·≈–À≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘

(6)

OR 13.889 (95% CI 1.542, 124.813) ´÷Ëß¡’π—¬ ”§—≠

∑“ß ∂‘μ‘

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 6 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß·≈–°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’ËÕß§™“μ‘

æ∫«à“°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫‰¡à ¡’

§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√∑’Ë¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà corpus carver- nosum (p 0.203) ‡™àπ‡¥’¬«°—∫°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà ure- thra °Á‰¡à¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õ߇™àπ°—π (p 0.976) ‡¡◊ËÕ∑¥ Õ∫∑—Èß Õß°√≥’¥â«¬

Pearsonûs chi-square ·≈–‡¡◊ËÕ‡ª√’¬∫‡∑’¬∫§«“¡

‡ ’ˬßμàÕ°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß®“°§à“ OR

°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà corpus carvernosum ‡¡◊ËÕ

‡∑’¬∫°—∫°≈ÿà¡∑’ˉ¡à¡’ ®–¡’§à“ OR 1.872 (95% CI 0.808, 4.335)  à«π°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà urethra ‡¡◊ËÕ

‡∑’¬∫°—∫°≈ÿà¡∑’ˉ¡à¡’ ®–¡’§à“ OR 1.016 (95% CI 0.374, 2.756) ´÷Ë߉¡à¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘

®“°√“¬ß“πº≈°“√μ√«®∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¡’°“√

√–∫ÿ∂÷ß°“√æ∫ tumor emboli „π∑àÕ∑“߇¥‘ππÈ”‡À≈◊Õß (lymphatic embolization) 7 √“¬ ∑ÿ°√“¬¡’°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ·≈–æ∫ tumor em-

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 5 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ (n=102 √“¬)

°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“ ¡’°“√·æ√à ‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à √«¡ Odds Odds ratio 95% CI p-value

°√–®“¬ (%) °√–®“¬ (%) Lower Upper

Carcinoma in situ 0 (0) 2 (100) 2 0 0 - - < 0.001*

Well differentiated 16 (30.2) 37 (69.8) 53 0.432 1 - -

Moderately differentiated 26 (65) 14 (35) 40 1.857 4.299 1.790 10.305

Poorly differentiated 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 7 6 13.889 1.542 124.813

√«¡ 48 (47.1) 54 (52.9) 102

*∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ Fisherûs exact test

√«¡ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫∑—È߇¡◊ËÕ·√°√—∫·≈–À≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘

μ“√“ß∑’Ë 6 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’ËÕß§™“μ‘ (n=102 √“¬)

°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’ËÕß§™“μ‘ ¡’°“√·æ√à ‰¡à¡’°“√·æ√à √«¡ Odds Odds ratio 95% CI p-value

°√–®“¬ (%) °√–®“¬ (%) Lower Upper

≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà Corpus Carvernosum

‰¡à¡’ 29 (42) 40 (58) 69 0.725 1 - - 0.203*

¡’ 19 (57.6) 14 (42.4) 33 1.357 1.872 0.808 4.335

≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà Urethra

‰¡à¡’ 39 (47) 44 (53) 83 0.886 1 - - 0.976*

¡’ 9 (47.4) 10 (52.6) 19 0.9 1.016 0.374 2.756

*∑¥ Õ∫¥â«¬ Pearsonûs chi-square

√«¡ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“¬—ßμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫∑—È߇¡◊ËÕ·√°√—∫·≈–À≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘

(7)

«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ Úıı ˆ ªï∑’Ë ÚÚ ©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú

Ú¯Û

boli „πÀ≈Õ¥‡≈◊Õ¥¥” (venous embolization) 5 √“¬

∑ÿ°√“¬¡’ lymphatic embolization ·≈–¡’°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ¡’º≈°“√μ√«®∑“ß æ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“ 1 √“¬∑’Ë√–∫ÿ«à“‰¡à¡’¿“«–¥—ß°≈à“«  à«π∑’Ë

‡À≈◊Õ‰¡à¡’°“√√–∫ÿ∂÷ß¿“«–¥—ß°≈à“««à“¡’À√◊Õ‰¡à¡’

«‘®“√≥å

®“°°“√»÷°…“ºŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘®”π«π 102 √“¬

„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ æ∫«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬√âÕ¬≈– 53.9 Õ ¬Ÿà„π®—ßÀ«—¥æ‘…≥ÿ‚≈°  à«π∑’ˇÀ≈◊Õ‡¥‘π∑“ß¡“®“°

®—ßÀ«—¥¢â“߇§’¬ß∑’ˉ¡à¡’»—≈¬·æ∑¬å√–∫∫∑“߇¥‘πªí  “«–

´÷Ëß∫“ß®—ßÀ«—¥¡’√–¬–∑“ß¡“°°«à“ 100 °‘‚≈‡¡μ√ ∑”„Àâ

¡’§à“„™â®à“¬ Ÿß „π¢≥–∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬ à«π„À≠à‰¡à¡’Õ“™’æ ∑”

‡°…μ√°√√¡À√◊Õ√—∫®â“ß´÷Ëß¡’√“¬‰¥âπâÕ¬ ‰¡à¡’¬“π æ“À𖇪ìπ¢Õßμ—«‡Õß ´÷ËßÕ“®‡ªìπ‡ÀμÿÀπ÷Ëß„À⺟âªÉ«¬‰¡à  “¡“√∂‡¥‘π∑“ß¡“√—∫°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡‰¥âμ“¡π—¥Õ¬à“ß μàÕ‡π◊ËÕß ºŸâªÉ«¬¡’Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ 59.59 ªï (SD 12.92) ´÷Ëß

„°≈⇧’¬ß°—∫º≈°“√»÷°…“¢Õß Mc Dougal WS(8) ´÷Ëß

‰¥â§à“Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ 61 SD 15 ªï

¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“쑇ªìπ¡–‡√Áß∑’Ë¡’°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’Ë

·≈–·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª∫√‘‡«≥„°≈⇧’¬ß‡ªìπ ”§—≠ °“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªÕ«—¬«–∑’ËÀà“߉°≈¡—°‡°‘¥„π™à«ß∑⓬ Ê

¢Õß‚√§ ‚¥¬ªí®®—¬∑’Ë∑”„À⺟âªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫¡’ ∂“π–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μμ—Èß·μà

·√°√—∫ À√◊Õ¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μÀ≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥ πà“®–

‡ªìπº≈¡“®“°√–¬–‡«≈“μ—Èß·μà‡√‘Ë¡‡°‘¥¡–‡√Áß∑’˪≈“¬

Õß§™“μ‘®πºŸâªÉ«¬¡“æ∫·æ∑¬å»—≈¬°√√¡√–∫∫ªí  “«–

Õ—π‡°‘¥®“°ªí®®—¬μà“ß Ê À“°ºŸâªÉ«¬¡“æ∫·æ∑¬å‡√Á«°Á®–

¡’ ∂“π–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ª√°μ‘·≈â«®÷ß‚μ¿“¬À≈—ß

·μàÀ“°¡“æ∫·æ∑¬å≈à“™â“®πμàÕ‡¡◊ËÕ¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‰ª¡“°

°Á®–¡’ ∂“π–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫‚μμ—Èß·μà·√°√—∫ ´÷Ëß

„π°“√»÷°…“π’È®–æ‘®“√≥“ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ

·√°√—∫·≈–ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μÀ≈—ß°“√ºà“μ—¥

Õß§™“쑇ªìπºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿࡇ¥’¬«°—π ‚¥¬æ∫«à“¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬√âÕ¬≈–

47.1 ∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ‚¥¬

¡’√–¬–‡«≈“‡©≈’ˬ§◊Õ 3.56 ‡¥◊Õπ ·μàÀ“°μ—¥°≈ÿࡺŸâªÉ«¬

∑’Ë¡’¿“«–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μμ—Èß·μà·√°√—∫ÕÕ° §à“‡©≈’ˬ

∑’Ë¡–‡√Áß®–·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊ÕßÀ≈—ߺà“μ—¥

Õß§™“μ‘§◊Õ 5.70 ‡¥◊Õπ ∑’Ëπà“ π„®§◊Õ√–¬–‡«≈“∑’Ëπ“π

∑’Ë ÿ¥∑’Ëæ∫¡–‡√Áß·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫§◊Õ 15 ‡¥◊Õπ ¥—ßπ—ÈπÀ“°¡’°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬π“π‡°‘π°«à“

15 ‡¥◊Õπ·≈⫺ŸâªÉ«¬¬—ߧ߉¡à¡’¿“«–º‘¥ª√°μ‘ ®–∂◊Õ«à“

ºŸâªÉ«¬‡À≈à“π—ÈπÀ“¬¥’·≈⫉¡àμâÕßπ—¥¡“μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡Õ’°

‰¥âÀ√◊Õ‰¡à ´÷Ëß Õ¥§≈âÕß°—∫ Lubke WL. et al.(9) ‰¥â

· ¥ß§«“¡‡ÀÁπ«à“ À“°¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘®–¡’°“√‡ªìπ

°≈—∫´È”®–‡°‘¥„π 2 ªï

ºŸâªÉ«¬ à«π¡“°®–‰¥â√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘

¥â«¬«‘∏’ partial penectomy 69 √“¬ (67.6%) total penectomy 27 √“¬ (26.5%) ·≈–¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬‰¥â√—∫°“√

ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ 33 √“¬ (32.4%) ´÷Ëß ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡π’È®–‰¥â√—∫°“√√—°…“‡æ‘Ë¡‡μ‘¡®“°Õ“¬ÿ√·æ∑¬å

‚√§¡–‡√Áß·≈–√—ß ’·æ∑¬å ·μà°Á¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬∫“ß√“¬∑’Ë·æ∑¬å ºŸâ√—°…“æ‘®“√≥“«à“ ¡§«√‰¥â√—∫°“√§«∫§ÿ¡°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬¥â«¬°“√„™â√—ß ’√—°…“ ‚¥¬‰¡àºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õß°àÕπ Õ¬à“߉√°Áμ“¡ ‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™‡æ‘Ëß

‡ªî¥„Àâ∫√‘°“√§≈‘π‘°‚√§¡–‡√Á߇¡◊ËÕ ¡°√“§¡ 2550 ‚¥¬

 à߉ª√—∫√—ß ’√—°…“∑’Ë ‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈‡Õ°™π ´÷Ëß„Àâ∫√‘°“√

‡©æ“–ºŸâªÉ«¬„π‚§√ß°“√À≈—°ª√–°—π ÿ¢¿“æ∑’Ë¢÷Èπ

∑–‡∫’¬π°—∫∑“ß‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™‡∑à“π—Èπ ·≈–

‡ªî¥„Àâ∫√‘°“√‡μÁ¡√Ÿª·∫∫·°àºŸâªÉ«¬∑ÿ°√“¬„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈

æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™„πªïæ.». 2553 ‚¥¬°àÕπÀπâ“π’ȺŸâªÉ«¬∑’ËμâÕß

‰¥â√—∫√—ß ’√—°…“ μâÕß à߉ª√—∫°“√√—°…“∑’Ë ∂“∫—π¡–‡√Áß

·Ààß™“μ‘ “¢“≈æ∫ÿ√’À√◊Õ≈”ª“ß ´÷Ë߇¡◊ËÕ àߺŸâªÉ«¬‰ª·≈â«

°Á®–μ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬‰¥â≈”∫“°‡π◊ËÕß®“°√–¬–∑“ß·≈–°“√

 ◊ËÕ “√ πÕ°®“°∑“ß ∂“∫—π¡–‡√Áß·Ààß™“μ‘ àߺŸâªÉ«¬

°≈—∫¡“‡æ◊ËÕμ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡À≈—ß„Àâ°“√√—°…“ ‚¥¬ºŸâªÉ«¬¡“

μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡μàÕ‡π◊ËÕß¡’§à“‡©≈’ˬ 18.48 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 21.63)  “‡Àμÿ∑’Ë ‘Èπ ÿ¥°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡¡“°∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ‰¡à¡“μ“¡π—¥

(49%) ‚¥¬¡’√–¬–‡«≈“°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡°àÕπ®–‰¡à¡“

μ“¡π—¥‡©≈’ˬ 10.56 ‡¥◊Õπ (SD 12.40) ·≈–π“π∑’Ë ÿ¥

(8)

§◊Õ 4 ªï 4 ‡¥◊Õπ°àÕπ‰¡à¡“ ‡Àμÿ∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬‰¡à¡“μ√«®

μ‘¥μ“¡‡æ√“–ºŸâ«‘®—¬§“¥«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬§‘¥«à“μπ‡ÕßÀ“¬‡ªìπ ª√°μ‘¥’·≈â« ª√–°Õ∫°—∫§«“¡‰¡à –¥«°„π°“√‡¥‘π∑“ß

®÷߉¡à‡ÀÁπ§«“¡®”‡ªìπ„π°“√¡“æ∫·æ∑¬åÕ’° ·≈–°“√

»÷°…“π’ȇ°Á∫¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈¬âÕπÀ≈—߇ªìπ‡«≈“π“π 11 ªï ª√–°Õ∫

°—∫ºŸâªÉ«¬ à«π„À≠à¡’Õ“¬ÿ¡“°·≈–Õ¬Ÿàμà“ß®—ßÀ«—¥ À“°

ºŸâªÉ«¬μâÕ߇¢â“√—°…“欓∫“≈À√◊Õ‡ ’¬™’«‘μ®“°‚√§„¥ Ê

„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈ª√–®”Õ”‡¿ÕÀ√◊Õ®—ßÀ«—¥¢Õßμπ °Á®–

°≈“¬‡ªìπºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡“μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡¢Õß‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈

æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ ´÷ËßμâÕß¡’°“√»÷°…“«‘®—¬‡æ‘Ë¡‡μ‘¡·≈–

«“ß·ºπμ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬„À⥒¬‘Ëߢ÷ÈπμàÕ‰ª

°“√»÷°…“º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘æ∫«à“

ºŸâªÉ«¬ à«π¡“°‡ªìπ™π‘¥ well differentiated carcinoma 53 √“¬ (52%) ‡ªìπ™π‘¥ moderately differentiated carcinoma 40 √“¬ (39.1%) ·≈– poorly differen- tiated carcinoma 7 √“¬ (6.9%)  à«π carcinoma in situ ´÷Ë߇ªìπ¡–‡√Áß∑’Ë¡’§«“¡√ÿπ·√ßπâÕ¬·≈–‰¡àæ∫°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß¡’ 2 √“¬ (2%) ·≈–‡¡◊ËÕ

»÷°…“§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å¢Õߺ≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“°—∫Õ“¬ÿ¢Õß ºŸâªÉ«¬ æ∫«à“‰¡à¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—π (p 0.348) ¥—ßπ—Èπ ºŸâªÉ«¬∑ÿ°™à«ßÕ“¬ÿ ®÷ß¡’ ‚Õ°“ ‡°‘¥¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘∑’Ë¡’

§«“¡√ÿπ·√ß∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“™π‘¥μà“ß Ê ‰¥â ‰¡à·μ°μà“ß°—π ªí®®—¬ ”§—≠∑’Ë¡’º≈μàÕ°“√欓°√≥å‚√§„πºŸâªÉ«¬

¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘ §◊Õ°“√μ√«®æ∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫®–¡’°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï√âÕ¬≈–

71-95 „π¢≥–∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ®–¡’°“√√Õ¥™’«‘μ 5 ªï‡æ’¬ß√âÕ¬≈– 28

¥—ßπ—Èπ°“√À“ªí®®—¬∑’Ë®–∑”𓬰“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫®÷ß¡’§«“¡ ”§—≠ ∑—Èßπ’ȇæ◊ËÕ‡ªìπ°“√

À≈’°‡≈’ˬ߿“«–·∑√°´âÕπÕ—π‡°‘¥®“°°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–

μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫„πºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡àπà“®–‰¥â√—∫ª√–‚¬™πå

®“°°“√ºà“μ—¥ ·≈–™à«¬μ—¥ ‘π„®ºà“μ—¥„π√“¬∑’Ëπà“®–‰¥â

√—∫ª√–‚¬™πå °àÕπ∑’Ë®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬·≈–¡’μàÕ¡πÈ”-

‡À≈◊Õß‚μÕ¬à“ß™—¥‡®π ∑—Èßπ’ȇæ◊ËÕ‡æ‘Ë¡‚Õ°“ √Õ¥™’«‘μ¢Õß

ºŸâªÉ«¬„π°≈ÿà¡∑’Ëπà“®–‰¥â√—∫ª√–‚¬™πå(11) ‚¥¬ªí®®—¬∑’ËÕ“®

∫àß™’È ‚Õ°“ ∑’Ë®–‡°‘¥°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

¢“Àπ’∫‰¥â·°à ≈”¥—∫§«“¡√ÿπ·√ß∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß

¡–‡√Áß (tumor differentiation) °“√≈ÿ°≈“¡¢Õß¡–‡√Áß

‡¢â“ Ÿà corpus carvernosum À√◊Õ urethra (T stage)

·≈–°“√æ∫ tumor emboli „π∑àÕ∑“߇¥‘ππÈ”‡À≈◊Õß

·≈–À≈Õ¥‡≈◊Õ¥¥”®“°°“√Õà“πº≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“(9,11-13)

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 4 ‡¡◊ËÕ»÷°…“∂÷ß§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß

°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–Õ“¬ÿ¢Õß ºŸâªÉ«¬ æ∫«à“Õ“¬ÿ‡©≈’ˬ¢ÕߺŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ª μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫§◊Õ 57.04 ªï ·≈–ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡’°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß§◊Õ 61.85 ªï ·μà‰¡à·μ°

μà“ß°—πÕ¬à“ß¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘ (p 0.060) ®÷ß √ÿª‰¥â

«à“Õ“¬ÿ‰¡à¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡

πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 5 º≈°“√»÷°…“ºŸâªÉ«¬¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘

„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ æ∫«à“º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¡’

§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

‚¥¬ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥Õß§™“μ‘∑’Ë¡’º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ well differentiated carcinoma 53 √“¬ ®–¡’°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‡æ’¬ß 16 √“¬ (30.19%) μà“ß°—∫°≈ÿà¡∑’˺≈

欓∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ moderately differentiated carcinoma 40 √“¬ ®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬ 26 √“¬ (65%) ·≈–

°≈ÿà¡∑’Ë¡’º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“‡ªìπ poorly differentiated carcinoma 7 √“¬ ®–¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬ 6 √“¬ (85%)

®÷ß √ÿª‰¥â«à“º≈∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘¡’

§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

(p < 0.001)(2,12) ·≈–‡¡◊ËÕæ‘®“√≥“§«“¡‡ ’ˬßμàÕ°“√

·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß®“°§à“ OR ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡

moderately differentiated carcinoma ®–¡’ OR 4.299 (95% CI 1.790, 10.305) ·≈–ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡ poorly dif- ferentiated carcinoma ®–¡’ OR 13.889 (95% CI 1.542, 124.813) ‡¡◊ËÕ‡ª√’¬∫‡∑’¬∫°—∫ºŸâªÉ«¬°≈ÿà¡ well dif- ferentiated carcinoma μ“¡≈”¥—∫ ¥—ßπ—ÈπÀ“°º≈

∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√Á߇ªìπ™π‘¥ well differentiated

(9)

«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ Úıı ˆ ªï∑’Ë ÚÚ ©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú

Ú¯ı

carcinoma °Á§«√®–„™â«‘∏’°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬∑ÿ° 3

‡¥◊Õπ À“°æ∫«à“§≈”‰¥âμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ¢÷Èπ ®÷ß®–

∑”°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊ÕßÕÕ° ‡æ◊ËÕ≈¥°“√ºà“μ—¥

∑’ˉ¡à®”‡ªìπÕ—π®–¡’º≈∑”„À⇰‘¥¿“«–·∑√°´âÕπ¢Õß°“√

ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß ·μàÀ“°º≈欓∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß

¡–‡√Á߇ªìπ moderately differentiated carcinoma À√◊Õ poorly differentiated carcinoma °Áπà“®–·π–π”„Àâ

∑”°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊ÕßÕÕ°‰¥â‡≈¬ ‚¥¬‰¡àμâÕß

√Õ„ÀâμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ ‡π◊ËÕß®“°°“√ºà“μ—¥°àÕπ∑’Ë μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß®–‚μ®–∑”‰¥âßà“¬°«à“ ·≈–‡æ‘Ë¡‚Õ°“ 

√ Õ ¥ ™’ «‘ μ „ Àâ °— ∫ ºŸâ ªÉ « ¬ ¡ “ ° ° «à “ ° “ √ ºà “ μ— ¥ ‡¡◊Ë Õ μà Õ ¡ πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ·≈â«(7,8,14)

®“°μ“√“ß∑’Ë 6 §«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫·≈–°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’Ë

‚¥¬∑’˰“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’˧◊Õ°“√®—¥Õ—π¥—∫¢—Èπ°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡

¢Õß¡–‡√Áßμ“¡ American Joint Committee on Can- cer Staging for Penile Cancer(15) ‚¥¬∑’Ë T2 §◊Õ

¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà corpus carvernosum ·≈– T3

§◊Õ¡–‡√Áß≈ÿ°≈“¡‡¢â“ Ÿà urethra ´÷Ëß®“°°“√»÷°…“§«“¡

 —¡æ—π∏套߰≈à“«„πºŸâªÉ«¬¢Õß‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™

æ∫«à“ ≈”¥—∫¢—Èπ°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’Ë (T stage) ‰¡à¡’

§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å°—∫°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

(p 0.203, p 0.906) ‚¥¬¡’§à“ OR 1.872 (95% CI 0.808, 4.335) ·≈– 1.016 (95% CI 0.374, 2.756) μ“¡≈”¥—∫

´÷Ëߢ—¥·¬âß°—∫°“√»÷°…“°àÕπÀπâ“π’È(7,9,11-13)

´÷ËߢâÕ·μ°μà“ß

¥—ß°≈à“«μâÕß∑”°“√»÷°…“μàÕ‰ª«à“‡°‘¥®“° “‡ÀμÿÕ–‰√

ªí®®—¬Õ’°ª√–°“√Àπ÷Ëß§◊Õ°“√æ∫ tumor emboli

„π∑àÕ∑“߇¥‘ππÈ”‡À≈◊Õß (lymphatic embolization)

·≈–„πÀ≈Õ¥‡≈◊Õ¥¥” (venous embolization) ®“°º≈

°“√μ√«®∑“ßæ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“ ´÷Ëß„π™à«ß‡«≈“ 11 ªï∑’Ë∑”°“√

«‘‡§√“–Àå¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈ æ∫«à“‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™¡’欓∏‘

·æ∑¬åÀ¡ÿπ‡«’¬π°—π¡“μ√«®™‘Èπ‡π◊ÈÕ 7 ∑à“π ‚¥¬°àÕπªï 2550 ¡’欓∏‘·æ∑¬å‡æ’¬ß 1 ∑à“π À≈—ß®“°π—Èπ°Á¡’欓∏‘

·æ∑¬å®“°‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬π‡√»«√¡“™à«¬μ√«®

·≈–¡’欓∏‘·æ∑¬å∑à“π„À¡à¡“ª√–®” ∑”„Àâæ∫¡’°“√

√–∫ÿ∂÷ß¿“«– lymphatic embolization ‡æ’¬ß 7 √“¬

·≈–∑ÿ°√“¬¡’°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

 à«π¿“«– venous embolization ¡’√–∫ÿ‰«â 5 √“¬ ∑ÿ°

√“¬¡’¿“«– lymphatic embolization ·≈–¡’°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫  à«πºŸâªÉ«¬∑’Ë¡’°“√√–∫ÿ

«à“‰¡à¡’¿“«–¥—ß°≈à“«¡’‡æ’¬ß 1 √“¬ ∑’ˇÀ≈◊Õ§◊Õ‰¡à‰¥â√–∫ÿ

‰«â«à“¡’À√◊Õ‰¡à¡’¿“«–¥—ß°≈à“« ´÷Ëß®“°¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈¥—ß°≈à“«πà“

®– —ππ‘…∞“π‰¥â«à“À“°æ∫«à“¡’¿“«– lymphatic À√◊Õ venous embolization °Á¡’‚Õ°“  Ÿß∑’Ë®–‡°‘¥°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ®÷ß ¡§«√∑’Ë®–ºà“μ—¥

‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊ÕßÕÕ°‰¥â‡≈¬ ‚¥¬‰¡àμâÕß√Õ„Àâ§≈”æ∫

μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ ´÷ËßμâÕß¡’°“√ª√– “πß“π°—∫∑“ß æ¬“∏‘·æ∑¬å‡æ◊ËÕ„Àâ¡’°“√√–∫ÿ«à“¡’À√◊Õ‰¡à¡’¿“«– lym- phatic À√◊Õ venous embolization μàÕ‰ª

 √ÿª

®“°°“√»÷°…“π’Èæ∫«à“¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘„π‚√ßæ¬“∫“≈

æÿ∑∏™‘π√“™ æ∫¡“°„π™à«ßÕ“¬ÿ 48-69 ªï §à“‡©≈’ˬ 59.59 ªï √–¬–‡«≈“°“√·æ√à°√–®“¬¡“μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫

π“π∑’Ë ÿ¥§◊Õ 15 ‡¥◊Õπ ®÷ßμâÕß·π–π”ºŸâªÉ«¬„Àâ¡“μ√«®

μ‘¥μ“¡„Àâπ“π°«à“ 15 ‡¥◊Õπ¢÷Èπ‰ª  à«π√–¬–‡«≈“∑’Ë®–

°”Àπ¥„À⺟âªÉ«¬¬ÿμ‘°“√μ√«®μ‘¥μ“¡ ®”‡ªìπμâÕß»÷°…“

‡æ◊ËÕÀ“¢âÕ¬ÿμ‘μàÕ‰ª‡æ◊ËÕ≈¥°“√‡¥‘π∑“ß¡“æ∫·æ∑¬å‚¥¬

‰¡à®”‡ªìπ ·≈– ¡§«√‡æ‘Ë¡¢’¥§«“¡ “¡“√∂ ∂“π æ¬“∫“≈„Àâ “¡“√∂∑”°“√√—°…“‰¥â§√∫∑ÿ°¢—ÈπμÕπ §◊Õ

°“√μ√«®«‘π‘®©—¬ „Àâ°“√√—°…“‚¥¬°“√ºà“μ—¥ „À⇧¡’

∫”∫—¥·≈–√—ß ’√—°…“ „π ∂“πæ¬“∫“≈·Àà߇¥’¬«®–¥’

°«à“·¬° à«π°“√√—°…“‡ªìπÀ≈“¬ Ê ·Ààß ´÷Ëß®–∑”„Àâ ºŸâªÉ«¬‰¡à‰¥â√—∫§«“¡ –¥«°·≈–¬ÿμ‘°“√√—°…“‰ª°àÕπ∑’Ë

®–√—°…“‰¥â§√∫∂â«π

„π°“√»÷°…“π’Èªí®®—¬∑’Ëæ∫«à“¡’º≈μàÕ°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫π—Èπ æ∫‡æ’¬ßªí®®—¬

‡¥’¬«∑’Ë¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘ §◊Õ≈”¥—∫§«“¡√ÿπ·√ß∑“ß æ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“ (tumor differentiation)  à«πªí®®—¬Õ◊ËπÕ“∑‘

Õ“¬ÿ ·≈–°“√≈ÿ°≈“¡‡©æ“–∑’Ë¢Õß¡–‡√Áß (T stage) ‰¡à

(10)

æ∫«à“¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏åÕ¬à“ß¡’π—¬ ”§—≠∑“ß ∂‘μ‘´÷Ëß·μ°

μà“ß®“°°“√»÷°…“°àÕπÀπâ“π’È  à«π°“√μ√«®º≈∑“ß æ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“æ∫«à“¡’ tumor emboli „πÀ≈Õ¥πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß (lymphatic embolization) ·≈–À≈Õ¥‡≈◊Õ¥¥” (venous embolization) ®–¡’·π«‚πâ¡ Ÿß∑’Ë®–‡°‘¥°“√·æ√à

°√–®“¬‰ªμàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ ¥—ßπ—ÈπÀ“°º≈∑“ß æ¬“∏‘«‘∑¬“¢Õß¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“쑇ªìπ moderately À√◊Õ poorly differentiated carcinoma À√◊Õμ√«®æ∫«à“ lym- phatic À√◊Õ venous embolization °Á ¡§«√∑’Ë®–‰¥â

√—∫°“√ºà“μ—¥‡≈“–μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õߢ“Àπ’∫ÕÕ°‡≈¬ ‚¥¬‰¡à μâÕß√Õ„Àâ§≈”æ∫μàÕ¡πÈ”‡À≈◊Õß‚μ°àÕπ

„π°“√»÷°…“π’È¡’¢âÕ®”°—¥§◊Õ‡ªìπ°“√»÷°…“‡™‘ß æ√√≥π“·∫∫¬âÕπÀ≈—ß ‚¥¬»÷°…“ºŸâªÉ«¬∑ÿ°√“¬„π™à«ß

‡«≈“ 11 ªï ∑”„Àâ¡’¢âÕ®”°—¥§◊Õ ¡’ºŸâªÉ«¬∑’ˉ¡à¡“μ√«®

μ‘¥μ“¡‚¥¬‰¡à∑√“∫ “‡Àμÿ∑’Ë·πàπÕπ®”π«π¡“° ´÷Ëß

∑”„Àâº≈ √ÿªÕ“®§≈“¥‡§≈◊ËÕπ‰¥â ¥—ßπ—Èπ®÷ß¡’¢âÕ‡ πÕ

·π–„Àâ∑”°“√«‘®—¬μàÕ‚¥¬ÕÕ°·∫∫°“√«‘®—¬·∫∫‰ª¢â“ß Àπâ“ (cohort study or prospective study) ‚¥¬

°”Àπ¥°√Õ∫‡«≈“„π°“√μ‘¥μ“¡ºŸâªÉ«¬‚¥¬Õ“»—¬¢âÕ¡Ÿ≈

®“°°“√»÷°…“π’È ‡æ◊ËÕ„Àâ ‰¥âº≈°“√»÷°…“∑’Ë∂Ÿ°μâÕ߬‘Ëߢ÷Èπ

°‘μμ‘°√√¡ª√–°“»

¢Õ¢Õ∫§ÿ≥ §ÿ≥π—π∑«—≤πå  “‡√◊Õß §ÿ≥¢π‘…∞“

°≈‘Ëπ¢®√ ·≈–‡®â“Àπâ“∑’Ëß“πÀâÕß∫—μ√ ß“π‡«™ “√ π‡∑»

°≈ÿà¡¿“√°‘®¥â“π‡∑§‚π‚≈¬’ “√ π‡∑» ∑’˰√ÿ≥“ ◊∫§âπ‡«™-

√–‡∫’¬π¬âÕπÀ≈—ß ·≈–§ÿ≥«‘‚√®πå »√’ ÿ¢ ∫√√≥“√—°…å ß“π ÀâÕß ¡ÿ¥ ΩÉ“¬«‘™“°“√·≈–«‘®—¬ °≈ÿà¡¿“√°‘®¥â“π»÷°…“·≈–

«‘®—¬ ∑’˰√ÿ≥“ ◊∫§âπ«“√ “√«‘™“°“√

6.

2. Novara G, Galfano A, De Marco V, Arbatini W, Ficarra V. Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2007;4(3):140-6.

3. Khuhaprema T, Srivatanakul P, Attasara P, Sriplung H, Wiganon S, Smitsawan Y. Cancer in Thailand Vol.

V, 2001-2003. Bangkok: Bangkok Medical Publisher;

2010.

4. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma : a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncl 2004;

5:240-7.

5. Ravi R. Correlation between the extent of nodal in- volvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of penis. Br J Urol 1993;72:817-9.

6. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H. Squamous cell carci- noma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival:

analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol 1994;151(5):1239-43.

7. Pettaway CA, Lance RS, Davis JW. Tumor of the pe- nis. In: Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Novick AC, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Phila- delphia: Saunders; 2012. p. 909-36.

8. Mc Dougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on histologic grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 1995;154:1364-6.

9. Lubke WL, Thomson IM. The case for inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of T2-T4, N0 penile cancer. Semin Urol 1993;11(2):80-4.

10. Brosman S. Penile cancer overview. Medscape refer- ence [serial online] 2012. [cited 2012 Aug 27]; [15 screens]. Available from: URL:http://emedicine.

medscape.com/article/446554-overview

11. Singapore Urological Association. Update of guide- lines on the management of penile cancer. Pro- ceedings of the second Uro-Oncology consensus meeting [serial online] 2000. [cited 2012 Mar 17]; [16 screens]. Available from: URL:http://sua.sg/guide- lines/penile_ cancer.swf

12. Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA, Santos MW, Tamboli P, Ro JY, et al. Tumor stage, vascular inva- sion and the percentage of poorly differentiated can- cer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 2001;

165(4):1138-42.

13. Solsona E, Iborra I, Ricós JV, Monrós JL, Dumont R, Casanova J, et al. Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 1992;22(2):115-8.

14. McDougal WS, Kirchner FK, Edwards RH, Killion LT. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for

‡Õ° “√Õâ“ßÕ‘ß

1.  ÿ√‘∏√  ÿπ∑√æ—π∏å. ¡–‡√ÁßÕß§™“μ‘. „π: «™‘√ §™°“√,

∫√√≥“∏‘°“√. μ”√“ ç‰æ±Ÿ√¬å §™‡ π’é »—≈¬»“ μ√å√–∫∫∑“ß

‡¥‘πªí  “«–·≈–Õ«—¬«– ◊∫æ—π∏噓¬. æ‘¡æå§√—Èß∑’Ë 1.

°√ÿ߇∑æ¡À“π§√: ∫’¬Õπ¥å ‡ÕÁπ‡∑Õ√剿√´å; 2547. Àπâ“ 801-

(11)

«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ Úıı ˆ ªï∑’Ë ÚÚ ©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú

Ú¯˜

primary lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1986; 136(1):38- 41.

15. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Campton CC, Fritz AG, Greene

Abstract Penile Cancer in Bhuddhachinaraj Hospital : Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Inguinal Node Metastasis

Pongsak Sancharoen

Department of Surgery, Bhuddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital Journal of Health Science 2013; 22:277-287.

Penile cancer is an uncommon disease. This retrospective descriptive study reported 102 pa- tients who had penile cancer treated at Bhuddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital from January 2001 to December 2011. The average age was 59.59 years. Most of clinical presentation included exophytic growth and ulcer. The surgical management for penile lesion included partial penectomy in 67.6 percent and total penectomy in 26.5 percent. The histological differentiation of tumor included well differentiated carcinoma in 52 percent, moderately differentiated carcinoma in 39.2 percent and poorly differentiated carcinoma in 6.9 percent. The patients had no clinical groin node metastasis in 52.9 percent and had groin node metastasis in 47.1 percent with average time after penile amputa- tion was 3.56 months and the longest time in case of groin node metastasis after amputation was 15 months. The main factors affecting significantly the incidence of groin node metastasis was degree of tumor differentiation but age and T stage were not. Lymphatic and venous embolization were most likely suggestive factors affecting incidence of groin node metastasis. The patients who had significant incidence should undergo immediate inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Key words: penile cancer, groin node metastasis, inguinal lymphadenectomy

FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed.

New York: Springer; 2010.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait