115
ก กกก ก ! ก"#$"% !"&'(&$
The scale development of performance based on indicators of good governance principles of the civil engineering division in the Tambon administrative
organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand
กก 1 ก 2 3 !"#$4
&$
&'!(!#&)*+ *!, &)#ก - #!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &
ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/ #"$" 5&ก67)ก#8 ก.!&!(! &/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31
#! ก4&/ #"$" - ##/#3ก.!&!(! &/ !ก 01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/ #"$"
ก 29/3ก'!##"+ 1 '5/5"+85.!& &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31
#! ก4&/ ' 340 ;0ก2 2&# (Systematics Random Sampling) + & "+353ก'! -'ก (Checklist) ก'!##"+ 2 ก 29/
85+Q"+6!!กก 501 !ก"0)ก*!, !กก5ก
#8 ' 10 RS+&$5;" ก!"Sก/ก6)!Q (Critical Incident Technique) - # ก'!##"+ 3 ก 29/ $5-ก2 85"&6,"+6!85 กก &2& &)ก/2 3'!&/! 0 RS+&'"!(&/ 20
8 ก'!*2 !(!23/Q2/#ก!ก!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/ #"$" 5 &ก!-
"YZ[ $35!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2
!-"!(& 70 !- !*!0)ก! /#/!#/) &)#ก - #$5ก67)ก
#8 ก.!&!(! &/ !ก01 "!(& 6 5 25 &)#ก ก.! 65
!(! - #"ก!(! & &)#ก ก.!&/#35 5 & - #
$2ก.!$5'& 23ก67)ก !"+ก/$5 ? : ก*!, !(!ก.!&/ !ก01
1 !กSกZ / !ก!QZ[!67 "0)ก*!, /" !1!. 0
2 ') #'"0)ก*!, /" !1!. 0
3 ') #'6#";; /" !1!. 0
4 ') #'6#"ก'!ก /" !1!. 0
116 Abstract
The purposes of this research were : to develop the elements and indicators of performance based on the indicators of good governance principles of the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand, to establish criteria for evaluating the performance based on indicators of good governance principles of the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand, and to evaluate the appropriateness of performance based on indicators of good governance principles of the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand. In phases 1, the samples were 340 officers in the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand.A cheek-list survey was employed to collect data. In phases 2, The target participants were 10 qualified experts in the field of the good governance, the strategic development, and the evaluation. The Critical Incident Technique was used to gain the target participants. And in phases 3, the target group was 20 qualified directors from different civil engineering divisions in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in Udon Thani.
The research results were as follows: The indicators were mostly suitable to be a measure of performance based on the indicators of good governance principles of the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand. The indicators were acceptable and could be applied as a measure of performance in the civil engineering division in the Tambon Administrative Organizations in upper Isaan region of Thailand. A total of 70 variables were interrelated and suitable for element analysis. The evaluation criteria for performance based on 6 areas of indicators of the principles of good governance were indentified 25 elements and 65 indicators, which were appropriate in terms of consistency and efficiency in practice and performance.
Keywords: development, indicators of good governance principles
"EF?
ก/'!ก*+ กก &5 &
!(&-2;6ก ก/'!ก(ก ; 85"+5 !"+ ! &
#3#!(l 01 ก ก;35/ !ก m0n *(o
!&!(กก & / ก 22ก! 2&61* &
#2&l 'S&S/ !ก01 -.!
ก 2 01 "/5"+ก $ก + & - # -"&ก&"++ ;&ก! &1Zoก'
!& - #ก & ;5' &ก5&
2 'ก"!(&1!o 1 ก - #1
# 2&'&'!& - #2 + & *+ 3/5#"
*(o &# #0$"+5-p&
0 &ก[/ 1* ;&5&- #
117 ก#ก /"+#"01* ;2&3 ' $5 !'#$2ก*!,#""+
!+& (!*#กก 5, 2544)
#"$"$5ก01 35 00กก &5 &/ !ก!o) 2 $5&ก3501 ก5&&S(
201 $5ก35 2&ก5&&3 /2&1!o + 01 $5ก35 00ก 22ก! "&2ก! & &)ก &
!o - # ก 2&-*2/ "!(&(*#2ก"&
3/5 &)ก'Qก5/561*!( 2ก/
- #ก'!กก $ก!Q 'S&"+ !ก! 2&
ก5&&2 01 +&"+!Q"!(&3#!
!o &)ก1!o/ ก "!(&!กก- # 85ก/; (!กq 6;6, 2542)
&)ก/2 RS+&/2&
&)กก &2"5 &+'กกก#' ' &
"&1!o"+2&55ก*!,61*3"กl 5 *("+3/5'Q
#ก3ก& 3ก/&5ก
*!,352&l !2/ !ก01 - .!"+/#ก!ก/& 2&ก *#
5#"01* - ##"08 ;2&3/5
!8 38 ก.!- #;2&3 3 6#ก!กp!&&3/5!Q-ก2ก22 ก ก#' ' - #0 3o#/2&
&!o- #/2&ก"+3ก 5- #!5 Q/- #5 &ก &#ก"+ 'S&
+5 ก.!&/ !ก01 3/5 - 2& &ก8-*2/ !ก01 3!&
; &!o ก &2& & &)ก/2
/5"+ก+ก!ก.!&5ก*!,
&1ก'/5"+"+!Q-2& ก 4 5 !&( 1) &ก2 5& /5"+!8 ก+ก!&ก2 5&- #&6# &ก2 5&- # 6#1*- #;&ก*Z - #-8
"+5"&- #&&!กZ+ &'!ก- #
*/# 2) & ก-- # /5"+
!8 ก+ก!&ก &
ก &# & กก2 5&
&ก5 - #& ก- 3) &06;1 /5"+ !8 ก+ก!&#
06;1- #ก'ก# &2&- #ก '' &#( - #&'!ก-2&"+ - # 4) &8!& & /5"+!8 ก+ก!&
'-8"+ &&8!&*!, & &"&8!&
& &'!"+- #rstr & - #& +"+$5!
/ (ก2&กก &2"5 &+, 2540) ก.!& &ก &2&3 &)ก/
2 "+82 *2 ก'* ก"' 2&
ก ก35'2"+$252$2&ก!
5 &ก3ก-ก5$Q/ ก8 ก
&3กก2 5&- #6# #5 - #-8"+5"&!&$2$5!ก!&3/5
"!! 'กก.!&+ &'!กก
*/# กก'2! ก6) !&$2
#"01*"2"+ /3/5ก/"5 &+
5 # "0 1 * $2 "+ '#*! , 3 /5 'Qก5/5'6) &กก#' '$5 RS+& 5 &ก! " 6&) (2548) !กก '&-82Qก !ก&ก'&
-82 $5"กSกZ*Yกก )!!+3
118 &)ก/2 -/2&/S+& *2 &)ก/
2 $5!+ &5 &'ก#2ก &)ก/2 $552ก!/!/52 ก !& !ก ก&ก$352! ก'
*/!& 1*8 3 4! ;4!"+ 1 + &&
& &)ก/2 vก5!Q! &- #
&35 &)ก/2 4!"+ 2 + &"p/- # Rp/!/52ก !& - #4!"+ 3 + &&!Q"3/5 &)ก /2 / 2.5 5"
'ก1ก'&- #Q/!&ก 25&5 85'! 'S&3'"+'#"ก'!+ & ก*!,!(!
ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2& 3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
#"$" *+ 3/5$5!(!- #-"&3ก .!&/ !ก01 &ก &2& 3 &)ก /2 !'#5 "+!Q3ก*!,
"5 &+3/5#"01*+&S(2 $
GH!ก I$
ก'!!(&( $5ก/!#&) & ก '!$5 3 #ก !&(
1. *+ *!, &)#ก - #!(! ก .!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก /2 31#! ก4&/
#"$"
2. *+ 5&ก67)ก#8 ก .!&!(! &/ !ก01 &ก &2&
3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
#"$"
3. *+ #/#3ก
.!&!(! &/ !ก01 &ก &2&
3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
#"$"
"ก I$
!$!&J 1 ก!กL!
กกก ก
! ก"#$"%
ก'!3##"+ 1 85'!'#"กSกZ ก- #&'!"+ก+5 &*+ ก/ &)#ก & ก.!&/ !ก01 ;
#/)( / (Content Analysis) - #ก!&#/) ( / (Content Synthesis) *+ 3/5$52& &ก &)#ก - #!(!ก.!& &ก &2& "+
5 &ก!/ !ก01 / !&'ก!('# 3/5 85"&6," ก' 5"ก"
ก 2 (Focus Group Discussion) - #85'!'#
ก & &)#ก - #!(!ก.!&
/ !ก01 "+82 ก' - #!'ก 85"&6,5&- *+ ' /p &852ก+5 &ก!ก.!& &ก &2&
3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
*+ "ก#/) &)#ก &' (Exploratory Factor Analysis) / !&'ก!('#"ก
#/) &)#ก &! (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) *+ ! &)#ก "+5&S('ก-
"YZ[ + $กp5 ก!ก 2! 2&2'#
5 &ก!;&5&3"&"YZ[/ $2 (Construct Validity) #/);35;-กp' LISREL (Fornell & Larcker, 1981 ; Anderson & Gerbing, 1988)
119
!$!&J 2 N"กOPก!"Q ก ก กก
! ก"#$"%
'ก &)#ก - #!(!ก.!&
/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 "+$5'กก'!##"+ 1 '#!(!/ 2!(
5&ก67)ก#8 ก.!&/ !ก 01 - 5 6#ก"+SกZ
"*0) - #85+Q *+ ' &&
( / (Content Validity) ก351Z (Wording)
!$!&J 3 !" "! ก ก กก
! ก"#$"%
/ !&'ก$5ก67)ก#!(! ก .!&/ !ก01 &ก &2& 3 &)ก /2 85'!'##/#
3ก.!& !(!ก.!& / !ก 01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/ 2
;ก/ก67)ก !/#"+
2+ !(&-2 5 # 75 S($
HQก I$
'กก'! ก*!,!(!ก.!&
/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/ #"$"
8 ก'! !&(
!$!&J 1 ก!กL!
กก กก
! ก"#$"%
#!!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31
#! ก4&/ 2!(&-2 4.13-4.80 2 +&o 2!(&-2 0.40-0.68 ;!(!"+
24 +& 1 ก' 5 /2&$5'ก 2" "2ก! 4.80 - #!(!"+24 ++ ก!&!!Q / !( *+ กก !+ก & "2ก! 4.13 6#
!(!"+2+&o& 8 #;)
"+ -"-ก2# "2ก! 0.68 - #!(!"+2 +&o+ 1 ก ' 5 /2&$5'ก 2"
"2ก! 0.40
!(!23/Q2/#ก!ก
!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&
3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
8 ก#/) &)#ก &' (Exploratory Factor Analysis)
8 ก' /# &"กR) /!*!0)#/2&!-2 KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy) 2"2ก! .962 RS+&
กก2 .50 -&2 5 "+#/) /#/!#/) &)#ก 2ก
" 5 Barletts test of shericity ก"
o2 "กR)/!*!0)( "กR) ก1*
(Identity matrix) / $2 *2 2 Chi-Square = 20247.23 - #2!!Q"& (Sig.) =.000 RS+&5 ก2 .05
!+ "กR)/!*!0)"+$5$2"กR) ก1*
-&2 !-"!(& 70 !-!*!0)ก! 'S&
/#/!#/) &)#ก $5
120 ก #/) &) #ก & ! (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) ;&5&!*!0) &)#ก 6 5 &!(!ก.!&/ !ก 01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 3 1#! ก4&/ ; "+!-ก5- 5 2 2$--)!*!"0) "2ก! 2.21 2!!
#! ก ก (GFI) "2ก! 0.92 2!!#!
ก ก "+! -ก5- 5 (AGFI) "2ก! 0.87 2!
!#!ก ก " (CFI) "2ก! 0.98 - #2กก !& & & + ;#6 (RMSEA) "2ก! 0.055 RS+&223/Q282ก67) ก52 p-value !&!( ; &)#ก ก.!&
/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 5 &ก!5 &#'!กZ)
&J 1 -' &;&5 & ! *! 0) &)#ก 6 5 &!(!ก.!&/ !ก 01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 3 1#! ก4&/
Var1 Var2 Var3 Var4 Var5 Var6 Var1 1.00
Var2 0.74 1.00 Var3 0.19 0.39 1.00 Var4 0.28 0.42 0.60 1.00 Var5 0.33 0.39 0.57 0.68 1.00 Var6 0.23 0.37 0.85 0.79 0.68 1.00
2!#"0q/!*!0)#/2& &)#ก &ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 2#/2& 0.19 S& 0.85
;2" (t-values) 2#/2& 3.93 S& 11.09 !+
2/!*!0) !!Q"&"+#! 0.05 2 3/Q2 23#!ก &
!$!&J 2 N"กOPก!"Qก ก กก
! ก"#$"%
ก#85+Qก2ก!*'6 5ก67)ก#8 ก.!&!(!
&/ !ก01 "!(& 6 5 25 &)#ก ก .! RS+&$5ก67)ก#8 ก.!&
!(! 65 !(!
!$!&J 3 !" "!ก ก กก
! ก"#$"%
121 85'!$5$3/585"&6, ' 20
*'6#/#35 5 &
&!(!ก! &)#ก 01 - #
$.!$5'& ;ก/ก67)ก ! /# "+2+ !(&-25 # 75 S($ *2 "ก!(! & &)#ก ก.!&
/ !ก01 "!(& 6 5 /#35 5 &- #$2ก.!$5'& 2 3ก67)ก !"+ก/$5
$Q
ก$Q!$!&J 1
!(!23/Q2/#ก!ก
!(!ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&
3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
(3/5/p2 !(!"+ก/S(*+ 35!
+- & 2& กS&1*/ #"5 !กZ6#ก&/ !ก01 !(!
"+!*!0)ก!ก67)o 35!
p' / 8 ก&/ !ก01
"+กS( + & "+23ก#Q/
ก&-8 - #ก#8 RS+& 5 &ก!- &') !! )- #6# (2543) $5ก 2S&
!(!2 + & 3ก!/ #61*0 /S+& + & #$5"!(&8 !*0) ก#ก"+3/5ก- - #ก#ก2 l / 8 !*0)2 l "+กS(3#/2&ก#ก/ !ก ' ก 2$52 0ก3ก#61*"+'3' /S+& &ก+ ;&ก#ก &ก3/5กก!
8 !*0)"+กS( - # 5 &ก!- & Q3' ก (2543) ก 22 !(!2 !#ก
!- / 2"+!&ก$5 RS+&352&( ก1*/
#"5 !กZ6#ก&/ 8 ก&
!(! 35!#ก6)/
+ & 2&/S+&"+ กก6)"+ 2 / "+กS(3-2 #2& "+SกZ *+ 3/5"2 ก6)!(l 23#!3 1# 2 2&$ ;'#ก#6ก6)3&
6- #ก/2! 3 !กZ6#"+
3ก 5&ก!'& &ก6)!(l "!(&
ก6)"+$5#63&6- #ก/2
! 3 !กZ6#"+3ก 5&ก!'& &
ก6)!(l
ก$Q!$!&J 2
"ก!(! & &)#ก ก.!&
/ !ก01 "!(& 6 5 /#35 5 &- #$2ก.!$5'& 2 3ก67)ก !"+ก/$5 RS+& 5 &ก!!
*#กก 5 (2544) $5ก 22 !(!01 &
-2 # &)ก'#5 &/#ก!-2 # &
&)ก '*'6/ !ก2 $( 5 &
/#ก! !กZ6#& &-2 #/2& 5 &
$.!$5 - #5 &;2&33!(!
& 5 &61*- #-2 &!(!- #ก
!(! 5 &5 "+! ก$5RS+&!(! - # 5  "+'#$5!'ก!(!$5 2&!'
ก$Q!$!&J 3
"ก!(! & &)#ก ก.!&
/ !ก01 /#35 5 &- #$2ก.!$5'& 23 ก67)ก !"+ก/$5 - #!(!ก.!&
/ !ก01 "+ &)#ก 6 5!(
122 5 &ก!- "YZ[ $35!(!
ก.!&/ !ก01 &ก &2&3 &)ก/2 31#! ก4&/
RS+& 'ก 2$52 !(!/ !ก01
$2ก.! 2&0 "!(&(85/
&)ก ก - ## '#5 &522 3กก/; ก'!"-8& ;&ก *+
$2ก*!, &)ก3/5$/ !ก01 RS+& 5 &ก!&'! & *! "0ก' -ก5*' (2551) $5"ก'!+ & ก35/ !ก01 3
! SกZ ก *2 'กก#/) ก- #&'!"+ก+5 &- #ก!1Z6) 85+Q85"&6, 85'! *2ก35/ !ก- 01 3! SกZ ก #ก 5 8 &)#ก !&( 1) / !ก!8 2) / !ก 0- # 1 3) / !ก;2&3 4) / !ก 52 5) / !ก!+& 6) / !กก22 7) / !ก60 - # 8) / !กก35 '/5"+ RS+&
5 &ก!-"YZ["+$5SกZ- #/p &85"&6, - #85+QRS+&$5ก/ก
!-"+SกZ &ก35/ !ก01 3
! SกZ ก*+ $SกZ$$5
N"L!
5 -#3ก8 ก'!$35 1. v/ &)ก/2 5 "+' 2 &ก"&$*!,
&3/5S($5 2 50 5;2&3 '#*!,#/3/5!' '
&2 ก!+3'3/285.!&กS(
2. v.!ก &)ก/2 8 ก'!$!& &*+ "
53'/ !กก"&/ !ก01 3/5กS(
+ "ก!/2&5&&- 5'#23/5 85.!&!&' 2 &/2& &3/5S(
5 -#3ก"'!!(&2 $
1. "กSกZ-"&ก.!&
!(!/ !ก01 ก!*S&* 3' &5ก 3/2& +l &1!o
2. กSกZ!*!0)#/2&2#!
ก.!&/ !ก01 ก!8 !Y"0q3 ก.!& & &)ก2&l
3. 8 ก'!!(&("3/585'!ก!+3' S( ก#!/S+&2/ !ก01 '#$5$
#ก)35ก!ก/ก'ก2&l & &)ก/
2 31#! ก4&/ 2 $
"กN
ก2&กก &2"5 &+. (2540). NS L!ก
!I T 2540. ก&"* : ;&**)2
"5 &+.
') !! !&ก) - # +l. (2543). "%J HOY$ : Hospital Quality Indicators. ก&"* : $).
Q3' ก. (2543). ก
HOกIก'\ก] กS
$'OP. "*0) QQกSกZZ[!67 ก '!- #*!,/ !ก !67" ! /" !";,.
123
*! "0ก' -ก5*'. (2551). กNก GH'\ก]"ก.
Z[*0)QQ!QZ[!67 ก/กSกZ !67" ! /" ! ก.
!*#กก 5. (2544). .
ก&"* : !*#กก 5 1 *5.
;16 *;!. (2550). HOHกI. **)!(&"+ 2.
ก&"* : 0#2"!*)-/2&
#"$".
" 6&). (2556). ก'\ก]^กก J . ก&"* : !ก&ก '&-82.
Claes Fornell & David F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research.
American Marketing Association.