Effect of Precipitation Aging Temperatures on Rejuvenation Heat Treated microstructures, Hardness and γ' Phase Stability in Udimet-500
Chanon NIEMKONG
1, Sureerat POLSILAPA
1and Panyawat WANGYAO
2*1
Materials Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Inovative Metals Research Unit, Metallurgical Engineering Department, Engineering
Faculty, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
This research has studied the effect of precipitation aging temperatures on size and area density ofγ' – particles of the reheat treated microstructures incast nickel basesuperalloy, grade Udimet-500. All specimens were performed the same solutioning treatment at temperature of 1,150°C for 4 hours following with various precipitation aging temperatures of 760, 780, 800 and 820°C for 16 hours. Furthermore, these reheat treated specimens were also performed long-term heating at temperatures of 900°C and 1000°C for 200 hours to evaluate γ'-phase stability. Finally, hardness measurements were also carried out. Form all obtained results, it was found that the standard precipitation aging temperature of 760°C for 16 hours provided the most phase stability after long-term tests as well as the maximum hardness.
Introduction
Udimet-500 is one of cast nickel based superalloysused gas turbine blade material in gas turbine enginesfor electricity generating. After long- term service, themicrostructure of the alloy, which consists of gamma (γ), gamma prime(γ') and/or carbides would be detrimentallydegraded leading to much lower mechanical propertiesat high temperatures.
However, these kinds of γ' precipitated strengthening materials could be microstructallyrestored by rejuvenation heat treatment, which basically consists of solutioning treatment and precipitation aging to provide the microstructural refurbishment as same as the news ones.(1-4)
The research will study the effect of precipitation aging temperatures in final microstructures in terms of size and area density of γ'-particles as well as the effect of these obtained microstructural characteristics on hardness behavior. Furthermore, the long-term heating at high temperatures were also performed to evaluate the γ'-phase stability at long-term exposures in Udimet-500.
Materials and Experimental Procedures
The investigated material is cast nickel- based superalloy, grade Udimet-500, a turbine bladematerial in gas turbine engines, which was used at high temperatures for 50,000 hours by Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT). The chemical composition of the alloy shown in Table 1.
Table 1. The chemical composition of cast nickel-base superalloy, grade Udimet-500
Elements Ni Cr Co Ti W Al Ta Mo Fe C B Zr Weight
Percent
(%wt.) Bal. 18 17 3 - 3 - 4 2 0.1 - -
The alloy was performed with various reheat treatment processes as following:
1. Solution treatment at temperature of 1,150°C for 4 hours then following with air cooling.
2. Precipitation aging at temperatures of 760, 780, 800 and 820°C for 16 hours then following with air cooling.
Then these received specimens after various reheat treatment conditions were prepared with cutting, grinding, polishing and etching for metallography analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, to investigate and evaluate the γ'-phase stability then all reheat treated specimen were performed with long-term heating tests at temperatures of 900°C and 100°C for 200 hours. Then these obtained specimens were
*Corresponding anther E-mail: [email protected]
J.Met.Mater.Miner.26 (1) 2016, DOI:10.14456/jmmm.2016.1
2
also studie treated and carried out
Results an
Figure 1. M 50 Figur Udimet-500 temperature coarse and throughout shows that t coarsening provide low
Figure 2. M
at Figur
solutioning the process both coars completely already for
J.Met.Ma
ed by SEM d long-term t with micr
nd Discussi
Microstructure 0,000 hours se re 1 show 0 after 50,0 es. The mic d very fine the γ-matrix the γ' precipit after long-t er mechanica
Microstructure o 1,150°C for 4 re 2 shows
treatment at s, with this se and fin
dissolved next step pre
ater.Miner.26
M. Additiona m heated sp
ro Vickers
ion
of as-receive ervice time.
ws the mic 000 hours s crostructure c e γ' precip x or it is bim tated particles term service al properties.(5
of solutioning 4 hours then a s the micro t 1,150°C fo
heat treatm ne γ'-partic
into the γ ecipitation ag
6 (1) 2016, D
NIEM
ally, all reh pecimens w hardness te
ed specimen a
crostructure service at h consists of b pitated parti modal structure
s is much m e, which sho
5-7)
g treated specim air cooling.
ostructure a or 4 hours. A ment conditi cles could
γ-matrix be ging process
DOI:10.14456
MKONG, C. e
heat were ests.
after
of high both cles e. It more ould
men
after After ion, be eing
.
a)
c Fig
spe 4 h 16 820 mic tem hig siz pre and
Fig
6/jmmm.201 et al.
)Aging at 760°C
c) Aging at 800 gure 3. Micro
variou Figure 3 ecimens afte hours and fo hours at te 0°C, respe crostructures mperatures o gher in γ'-pha e comparing ecipitation ag
d 5.
gure 4. The re variou 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
Average Area of γ'Paticles
16.1
C/16 hours.
0°C/16 hours.
ostructures of us precipitation 3 a)–d) show er solutioning llowing with emperatures ectively. F s, it could b of precipitati
ase area dens g to these of ging (Figure
elationship be us agingtempe 760 °C 7 Aging
b) Aging at 7
d) Aging at 8 f specimens a n aging tempe w the micros g treatment h precipitatio
of 760, 78 From these be seen that ion aging p sity as well a
specimen w e 3a) see als
etween γ’ part eratures 780 °C 800
Temperatur
780°C/16 hours.
820°C/16 hours.
after aging at eratures.
structures of at 1,150°C/
on aging for 80, 800 and e received t the higher provided the as γ'-particle with standard so figures 4
icles size and
°C 820 °C es ( °C )
t
f / r d d r d
d
Figure 5. Th va
Figure 6. M v Figur specimens w following w hours. From
a) Aging at 7 and heating hours/ 200
c) Aging at 80 and heating
Hrs.
0 5 10 15 20 25
γ'‐Area Density
he relationshi arious agingte
Microstructure various tempe res 6 a) – d) with various with long-ter m these obta
760°C/16 hours g at 900°C/200
Hrs.
00°C/16 hours g at 900°C/200
760 °C 7 Aging
Har
p between γ’
emperatures
es of specime eratures then h show the mi reheat treatm rm heating at
ained results
s 0
b) Aging at heating at
d) Aging at and heati Hrs.
780 °C 800 ° Temperature
rdness and γNIEM
area density
ns after aging heating at high
icrostructure ment conditi t 900°C for 2 s, it was fou
780°C/16 hour t900°C/200 Hrs
820°C/16 hour ng at 900°C/20
°C 820 °C es ( °C )
MKONG, C. ' Phase Stabi
and
g at her
s of ions 200 und
tha par tho agi pro are
Fig
Fig rs and
s.
rs 00
J.Met.Mate et al.
ility in Udim
at this heatin rticles and γ ose of figure
ing tempera ovided dram ea density of
gures 7. The and
900°
gures 8. The r vari 900°C
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
γ'‐Area Density
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Average Area of γ'Paticles 7
er.Miner.26 met-500
ng resulted γ'-phase area
s 3a) – 3d).
atures (800 matically incr
γ'-particles,
relationship various aging
°C/200 hours
relationship b ious agingtem C /200 hours
760 °C 78 Aging T 760 °C 780
Aging Tem
(1) 2016, DO
in the coar a density co
Furthermore and 820°C reasing in bo see figures 7
between γ’ p gtemperatures a
etween γ’ are mperatures afte
80 °C 800 ° Temperature
°C 800 °C mperatures (
OI:10.14456/
3
sening ofγ'- omparing to e, the higher C/16 hours) oth size and 7 and 8.
particles size after heating at
a density and er heating at
°C 820 °C es ( °C )
820 °C ( °C )
/jmmm.2016
r d
t
d t
6.1
4 NIEMKONG, C. et al.
Figure 9. Microstructures of specimens after aging at various temperatures then heating at higher temperature
at 1,000°C for 200 hours.
Figures 9 a) – d) show the microstructures of specimen with various reheat treatment conditions following with long-term heating at 1,000°C for 200 hours. The received results clearly show the much higher effect of higher heating temperature on γ'-particle coarsening than those of figures 6a) – 6d). There is also the same trend asit was found in long-term heating 900°C for 200 hours that the higher aging temperatures (800 and 820°C/16 hours)
resulted in rapidly increasing of both size and area density of γ'-particle, see also figures 10 and 11.
Figure 10. The relationship between γ’ particles size and various agingtemperatures and heating at 1000°C/200 hours.
Figure 11. The relationship between γ’ area density and various agingtemperatures and heating at 1000 °C/200 hours.
a) Aging at 760°C/16 hours and heating
b) at 1,000°C /200 Hrs.
b) Aging at 780°C/16 hours and heating at 1,000°C/200 Hrs.
c) Aging at 800°C/16 hours and heating at 1,000°C/200 Hrs.
d) Aging at 820° /16 hours and heating at 1,000°C/200 Hrs.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
760 °C 780 °C 800 °C 820 °C
Average Area of γ'Paticles
Aging Temperatures ( °C )
Aging Long term testing at 900 °C Long term testing at 1000 °C 0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
760 °C 780 °C 800 °C 820 °C
Average Area of γ'Paticles
Aging Temperatures ( °C )
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
760 °C 780 °C 800 °C 820 °C
γ'‐Area Density
Aging Temperatures ( °C )
Figure 12.The relationship between γ’-particles size and various agingtemperatures after heating at high temperatures
J.Met.Mater.Miner.26 (1) 2016, DOI:10.14456/jmmm.2016.1
5 NIEMKONG, C. et al.
Hardness and γ' Phase Stability in Udimet-500
Form overall results re-expressed in Figures 12 and 13, which show the effects of aging temperatures and long-term heating temperatures on size (average area of γ’-particle) and γ’-phase area density, respectively. It could be summarized that long-term heating at high temperatures provided
much more effect of both very rapid γ’-particle coarsening and increasing in γ’-phase area density.
This result was much more pronounced when the specimens were performed with the higher precipitation aging temperatures of 800 and 820°C for 16 hours.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
760 °C 780 °C 800 °C 820 °C
γ'‐Area Density
Aging Temperatures ( °C )
Aging Long term testing at 900 °C Long term testing at 1000 °C
Figure 13. The relationship between γ’-area density and various agingtemperatures after heating at high temperatures
350360 370380 390400 410420 430
Hardness ( HV )
Heating conditions
Figure 14.The relationship between hardness and reheat treatment conditions
J.Met.Mater.Miner.26 (1) 2016, DOI:10.14456/jmmm.2016.1
6 NIEMKONG, C. et al.
Figures 14 and 15 show the obtained hardness results from specimens with various reheat treatment conditions and long-term heating tests. From these obtained results, it was found that the higher of precipitation aging temperatures resulted in lower hardness values. Furthermore, it was also found that
the higher heating temperature resulted in much lower hardness values.(6-10) From these, it could be concluded that the hardness ismore dependanton the size of γ’-particle much more than the γ’-phase area density, which usually provides higher hardness, see details in Figures 16 and 17.
350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430
760 °C 780 °C 800 °C 820 °C
Hardness ( HV )
Heating conditions
Aging Heating at 900 °C Heating at 1000 °C
Figure 15.The relationship between hardness and various agingtemperatures after heating at high temperatures
370 380 390 400 410 420 430
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Hardness ( HV )
Average Area of γ'Paticles
Figure 16. The relationship between hardness and γ' particles size
J.Met.Mater.Miner.26 (1) 2016, DOI:10.14456/jmmm.2016.1
7 NIEMKONG, C. et al.
Hardness and γ' Phase Stability in Udimet-500
Conclusions
1. Higher precipitation aging temperature provided higher results in size and area density of γ'-particles but lower in hardness.
2. Higher heating temperature provided also both increasing in size and area density of γ'- particles but decreasing in hardness.
3. The effect of size of γ'-particles on hardness was much more pronounced than that of γ'-phase area density.
4. The lowest precipitation aging (standard aging temperature) form temperature even provided the lowest area density and size of γ'- particles but
resulted in the highest hardness and the most γ'- phase stability after long-term heating tests.
References
1.Zrnik,J.,Wangyao,P.,Vrchovinsky, V., Hornak,P.
and Mamuzic,I.(1997). Metallurgija,36 : 225-228.
2. Zrnik,J., Semenak,J.,Vrchovinsky, V. and Wangyao, P.
(2001).Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 319 : 637- 642.
3. Kvackaj, T.,Zrnik,J.,Vrchovinský, V. and Wangyao, P.
(2002).High Temp. Mater. Process. 21(6) : 351-359.
4. Kvackaj, T., Zrnik, J., Vrchovinský, V. and Wangyao, P.
(2003). High Temp. Mater.Process. 22(1) : 57-62.
5. Lothongkum, G., Khuanleang, V., Hromkrajai, W.
and Wangyao, P. (2006). High Temp. Mater.
Process. 25(4) : 175-185.
6. Wangyao, P., Krongtong, V., Panich, N., Chuankrerkkul,, N.
and Lothongkum, G. (2007). High Temp.
Mater. Process. 26(2) : 151-160.
7. Wangyao, P., Zrnik, J., Mamuzic, I., Polsilapa, S.
and Klaijumrang, S.(2007). Metallurgija.
46 : 195-199.
8. Wangyao, P.,Kraus, L.,Zrnik,J. and Nemecek, S.
(2007). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 192 : 360- 366.
9. Wangyao, P., Polsilapa, S., Chaishom, P., Zrnik, J., Homkrajai, W. and Panich, N. (2008). High.
Temp. Mater.Process.27 : 41-50.
10. Wangyao, P., Suvanchai, P., Chuankrerkkul, N., Krongtong, V., Thueploy, A., Homkrajai, W.
(2010). High Temp. Mater. Process. 29(4) : 277-286.
360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hardness ( HV )
Figure 17.The relationship between hardness andγ' area density
J.Met.Mater.Miner.26 (1) 2016, DOI:10.14456/jmmm.2016.1