• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1 นิสิตระดับปริญญาโท, 2*, 3ผูชวยศาสตราจารย ภาควิชาคณิตศาสตร คณะวิทยาศาสตร มหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม

1 Student faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, MahaSarakham, Thailand, 44150.

2*, 3Assistant professor, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand.

* Corresponding Author : [email protected]

เซต ในปริภูมิสองโครงสรางเล็กสุด -Sets in Biminimal Structure Spaces

ชนิกา กุลคอ

1

, จีระนันท คําภักดี

2*

, ดรุณี บุญชารี

3

Chanika Kulkhor

1

, Jeeranunt Khampakdee

2*

, Daruni Boonchari

3

Received: 20 December 2017; Accepted: 9 February 2018 บทคัดยอ

งานวิจัยนี้จะนําเสนอแนวคิดเกี่ยวกับเซต ในปริภูมิสองโครงสรางเล็กสุดและตรวจสอบคุณสมบัติบางประการของเซต รวมทั้งฟงกชันตอเนื่อง ในปริภูมิสองโครงสรางเล็กสุด

คําสําคัญ : เซต , ฟงกชันตอเนื่อง Abstract

In this article, we introduce the concepts of -sets in biminimal structure spaces and investigate some of their properties. Moreover, the notions of -sets and -continuous functions in biminimal structure spaces were studied.

Keywords : -set, -continuous function.

Introduction

In 1972, J. Dugundji7 introduced the concepts of regular closed sets in topological spaces. Let (X ) be a topological space and A X, then A is called regular closed if and only if A=Cl(Int(A)). In 1986, J.Tong21 introduced the concepts and properties of -sets in topological spaces. Let A be a subset of a topological space (X ) then A is an -set in (X ) if A=U B when U is open and B is regular closed in (X ). In addition, J.Tong21 introduced the concepts of -continuous functions from a topological space (X ) to a topological space (Y ). Letf be a function from X to Y, then f is -continuous function if and only if the inverse image of each open set in Y is an -set in X. In 1990, M. Ganster, and Reilly, I. L.10 improved J. Tong’s decomposition result and provided a decomposition of -continuous. In 2000, the concepts of minimal structure spaces were introduced by V. Popa and T. Noiri18. A pair (X, mX) is a minimal structure space if and only if X Ø and mX is family of

P(X) with Ø, XmX. Moreover, they also introduced the concepts of mX-open sets and mX-closed sets in minimal structure spaces. In 1963, J. C. Kelly9 introduced the concepts of bitopological spaces which consist of a nonempty set and two topological spaces. In 2010, C.

Boonpok2 introduced the concepts of biminimal structure spaces which consist of a nonempty set and two minimal structures. Furthermore, C. Boonpok2 defined mX1mX2- closed sets in biminimal structure spaces and the comple- ment of mX1mX2-closed sets is call mX1mX2-open sets. In 2010, C. Boonpok [4] defined (i, j) mX-regular open sets in biminimal structure spaces and he also defined (i, j) mX-regular closed sets as complement of (i,j) mX- regular open sets for i, j = 1, 2 and i j.

In this article we introduce the concepts of -sets in biminimal structure spaces and -continuous functions in biminimal structure spaces. Also, we study some properties of -sets and -continuous functions in biminimal structure spaces.

(2)

Preliminaries

In this section, we will give some definitions and notations, deal with some prelim inaries and some useful results that will be duplicated in later sections.

Definition 2.110 Let (X ) be a topological space and M X. Then M is called an -set if M = U B when U is open and B is regular closed in X.

The family of all -sets in a topological space (X ) is denoted by (X ).

Definition 2.217 Let X be a nonempty set and P(X) be the power set of X. A subfamily mX of P(X) is called a minimal structure (briefly an m-structure) on X if Ø mX and X

mX.

The pair (X, mX), we denote a nonempty set X with an m-structure mX on X and it is called a minimal structure space (briefly an m-space). Each member of mX is said to be mX-open and the complement of an mX-open set is said to be mX-closed.

Definition 2.317 Let X be a nonempty set and mX an m- structure on X. For a subset A of X the mX-interior of A and the mX-closure of A with respect to mX are defined as follows:

mXInt(A) ={ U:UA, U mX }, mXCl(A) ={ F:AF, X \ FmX }.

Lemma 2.414 Let X be a nonempty set and mX an m-structure on X. For any subsets A and B of X, the following properties hold:

(1) mXCl(X \ A) = X \ mXInt(A) and mXInt(X \ A) = X \ mXCl(A),

(2) If (X \ A) ∈ mX, then mXCl(A) = A and if A mX , then mXInt(A) = A,

(3) mXCl(Ø) = Ø, mXCl(X) = X, mXInt(Ø) = Ø and mXInt(X) = X, (4) If A B, then mXCl(A)mXCl(B) and mXInt(A) mXInt(B),

(5) A mXCl(A) and mXInt(A)A, (6) mXCl(mXCl(A)) = mXCl(A) and mXInt(mXInt(A)) = mXInt(A), (7) mXInt(AB) = mXInt(A)mXInt(B) and mXInt(A)mXInt(B)mXInt(AB),

(8) mXCl(AB) = mXCl(A)mXCl(B) and mXCl(AB)mXCl(A)mXCl(B).

Definition 2.513An m-structure mX on a nonempty set A is said to have property if the union of any family of subsets belonging to mX belongs to mX.

Lemma 2.617 Let X be a nonempty set and mX is an m- structure on X satisfying property .

For A X the following properties hold:

(1) A mX if and only if mXInt(A) = A, (2) A is mX-closed if and only if mXCl(A) = A, (3) mXInt(A) is mX-open and mXCl(A) is mX-closed.

Definition 2.73 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and R X.

Then R is called mX-regular closed if and only if R = mXCl(mXInt(R)).

The family of all mX-regular closed sets in an mX-space (X, mX) is denoted by RC(X, mX)

Definition 2.819 A subset A of an m-space (X, mX) is called an m-preopen set if A mXInt(mXCl(A)) and an mX-preclosed set if mXCl(mXInt(A))A.

The family of all mX-preopen sets in an m- space (X, mX) is denoted by PO(X, mX) and m-preclosed sets in an m-space (X, mX) is denoted by PC(X, mX)

Definition 2.919 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and A X, the mX-preclosure of A is denoted by mXpcl(A) is defined as the intersection of all mX-preclosed of (X, mX) containing A.

Proposition 2.1019 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and A, B

X. If A B then mXpcl(A) mXpcl(B).

Proposition 2.1119 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and A X. If mX satisfies the property . Then mXpcl(A) = A

mXCl(mXInt(A)).

Definition 2.122 Let A be a nonempty set and mX1mX2 be m-structures on X. A triple (X, mX1, mX2) is called a bi- minimal structure space (briefly bim- space).

Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. The mX-closure and mX-interior of A with respect to mXi are denoted by mXCl(A) and mXInt(A) respectively, for i, j = 1, 2.

Each member of mXi is said to be an mXi-open set and the complement of an open set is said to be mXi-closed, for i, j = 1, 2.

(3)

Definition 2.134 A subset A of biminimal structure spaces (X, mX1, mX2) is said to be

(1) (i, j)mX-regular open if A = mXiInt(mXjCl(A)), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j,

(2) (i, j)mX-semi-open if A mXiCl(mXjInt(A)) where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j,

(3) (i, j)mX-preopen if A mXiInt(mXjCl(A)), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

The complement of an (i, j)mX-regular open (resp.

((i, j)mX-semi-open, (i, j)mX-preopen) set is called (i, j) mX-regular closed (resp,((i, j)mX-semi-closed, (i, j)mX- preclosed).

Lemma 2.144 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A be a subset of X. Then

(1) A is (i, j)mX-regular closed if and only if A = mXiCl(mXjInt(A)),

(2) A is (i, j)mX-semi-closed if and only if mXiInt(mXjCl(A))A,

(3) A is (i, j)mX-preclosed if and only if mXiCl(mXjInt(A))A.

Definition 2.15 [4] Let (X, mX1, mX2) and

(Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure space. A function f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2) is said to be (i, j)-M-con- tinuous at a point x X and each VmYi containing f(X), there exists UmXj containing x such that f(U)V, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

A function f : (X, mX1, mX2)(Y, mY1, mY2) is said to be (i, j)-M-continuous if it has this property at each point x X.

Theorem 2.164 For a function f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2), the following prop erties are equivalent:

(1) f is (i, j)-M-continuous;

(2) f – 1(V) =mXjInt(f – 1(V))for every V mYi (3) f (mXiCl (A)) mYiCl(f(A)) for every subset A of X;

(4) mXjCl(f – 1(B)) f – 1(mYiCl (B)) for every subset B of Y;

(5) f – 1(mYiInt(B)) mXjInt(f – 1(B)) for every subset B of Y;

(6) mXjCl(f – 1(F)) = f – 1(F) for every mYi-closed set F of Y.

Results and Discussion

-sets in minimal structure space

In this section, we introduce the concept of -sets in minimal structure spaces.

Definition 3.1.1 Let (X, mX) be an m-space. A subset M of A is said to be an mX- -set if there exist G and R such that M = GR when G is mX-open and R is mX-regular closed.

The family of all mX- -set in an m-space (X, mX) is denoted by (X, mX).

Example 3.1.2 Let X = {1, 2, 3}. Define an m-structure mX on X as follows : mX = {Ø, {2}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, X}. Then RC(X, mX) = {Ø, {2}, {1, 3}, X} and (X, mX) = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, X}.

Definition 3.1.3 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and A X, then A is said to be an mX--set if mXInt(A) = mXInt(mXCl(A)).

The family of all mX- -set in an m-space (X, mX) is denoted by (X, mX).

Example 3.1.4 Let X = {1, 2, 3} and define mX = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, X} be an m-structure on X. It follows that (X, mX) = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, X}.

Proposition 3.1.5 Let (X, mX) be an m-space and R X. If R is mX-regular closed then R is an mX- -set.

Proof. Let R be an mX-regular closed. Then R = mXCl (mXInt(R)). Consequently, mXCl(R) = mXCl(mXCl(mXInt(R))).

Thus mXInt(mXCl(R)) = mXInt(mXCl(mXInt(R))). Hence mXInt(mXCl(R)) = mXInt(R). Therefore, R is an mX- -set.

-sets in biminimal structure space

In this section, we introduce the concept of -sets in biminimal structure spaces and study some fundamental properties of -sets in biminimal structure spaces and investigate some of their properties.

Definition 3.2.1 A subset A of a biminimal structure space (X, mX1, mX2) is said to be (i, j)mX-locally closed if there exist G and F such that A = GF when G is an mXi-open set G and F is an mXj-closed set, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

The family of all (i, j)mX-locally closed sets in biminimal structure spaces (X, mX1, mX2) is denoted by (i, j)mX- (X, mX1, mX2), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

(4)

Example 3.2.2 Let X = {a, b, c}. Define m-structures mX1 and mX2 on X as follows : mX1 = {Ø, {b, c}, X} and mX2 = {Ø, {c}, X}. Thus (1, 2)- (X, mX1, mX2) = {Ø, {b}, {b, c}, {a, b}, X}.

Lemma 3.2.3 Let S be a subset of a biminimal stucture space (X, mX1, mX2) and let i, j = 1 or 2 and i j. If S is an (i, j)mX-locally closed set then there exists an mXi-open set U such that S = UmXjCl(S)

Proof. Let S be an (i, j)mX-locally closed set. Then there exist U and F such that S = U F where U is mXi-open and F is mXj-closed. Since S = U F, S F. Thus mXjCl(S) mXjCl(F). Since F is mXj-closed, mXjCl(S) F. Then UmXjCl(S) U F = S. Since S U and S mXjCl(S). Then S U mXjCl(S). Therefore, there exists an mXi-open set U such that S = U mXjCl(S).

The converse of Lemma 3.2.3 is true if mXj has property as a following proposi tion.

Proposition 3.2.4. Let S be a subset of a biminimal stucture space (X, mX1, mX2) and let mXj has property , where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j. Then S is an (i, j)mX-locally closed set iff there exists an mXi-open set U such that S

= U mXjCl(S).

Proof. (⇒) By Lemma 3.2.3.

(⇐) Let S = U mXjCl(S), for some U mXi. Since mXj has property , mXjCl(S) is closed in (X, mXj). Thus S is an (i, j)mX-locally closed.

Definition 3.2.5. Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space. A subset M of X is said to be an (i, j)mX- -set if there exist G and R, such that M = GR when G mXi and R is mXj-regular closed, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

The family of all (i, j)mX- -sets in a biminimal structure space (X, mX1, mX2) is denoted by (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2) where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Example 3.2.6. Let X = {1, 2, 3}. Define m-structures mX1 and mX2 on X as follows : mX1 = {Ø, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, X} and mX2 = {Ø, {2}, {1, 2}, X} which are m-structures on X. It follows that RC(X, mX2) = {Ø, X}. Thus (1, 2) (X, mX1, mX2) = {Ø, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, X}.

Lemma 3.2.7. Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space mXj has property . If a subset M of X is an (i, j) mX- -set, then M is (i, j)mX-locally closed, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. Let M is an (i, j)mX- -set. Then there exist G and R such that M = GR where G mXi-open and R is mXj-regular closed. Since R is mXj-regular closed, R = mXjCl(mXjInt(R)). But mXj has property , then mXjCl(mXjInt(R)) is closed. Hence R is mXj-closed. It follows that M is an (i, j)mX-locally closed.

Proposition 3.2.8 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and mXjmXi has the property . If a subset M of X is both (i, j)mX-semi-open and (i, j)mX-locally closed, then M is an (i, j)mX- -sets, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. Let M be both (i, j)mX-semi-open and (i, j)mX-lo- cally closed. It follows that M mXjCl(mXjInt(M)) such that M = U mXjCl(M). Since mXjCl(M)mXjCl(mXjInt(M)).

But mXjCl(mXjInt(M))mXjCl(M), hence mXjCl(M) = mXjCl(mXjInt(M)) and mXjCl(mXjInt(M)) is mXj-regular closed.

Consequently mXjCl(M) is mXj-regular closed. Therefore, M is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Definition 3.2.9 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. Then A is said to be an (i, j)mX- -set if mXiInt(A)) = mXiInt(mXjCl(A)), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

The family of all (i, j)mX- -sets in a biminimal structure spaces (X, mX1, mX2) is denoted by (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2) for i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Example 3.2.10 Let X = {1, 2, 3}. Define m-structures mX1 and mX2 on X as follows : mX1 = {Ø, {1}, {3}, {2, 3}, X} and mX2 = {Ø, {1}, {1, 2}, X}.

Thus (1, 2)- (X, mX1, mX2) = {Ø, {3}, {2, 3}, X}.

Theorem 3.2.11 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. Then A is an (i, j)mX- -set if and only if A is an (i, j)mX-semi-closed, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. (⇒) Let A be an (i, j)mX- -set. Then mXiInt(A)) = mXiInt(mXjCl(A)). Thus mXiInt(mXjCl(A)) A. Hence A is an (i, j)mX-semi-closed.

(⇐) Let A be an (i, j)mX-semi-closed. Then mXiInt(mXjCl(A))

A. Thus mXiInt(mXiInt(mXjCl(A))) mXiInt(A). Hence mXiInt(mXjCl(A)) mXiInt(A). Since mXiInt(A) mXiInt(mXjCl(A)). Thus mXiInt(A) = mXiInt(mXjCl(A)). Hence A is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Definition 3.2.12 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. Then A is said to be an

(i, j)mX- -set if A = UT, when U is an mXi-open set and T is an mXj- -set, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

(5)

The family of all (i, j)mX- -sets in a biminimal structure space (X, mX1, mX2) is denoted by (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Example 3.2.13 Let X = {1, 2, 3}. Define m-structures mX1 and mX2 on X as follows : mX1 = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {2, 3}, X} and mX2 = {Ø, {1}, {3}, {2, 3}, X}. Then {Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, X} are mX2- -sets. Therefore, (1, 2)- (X, mX1, mX2) = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, X}.

Theorem 3.2.14 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. If A is an (i, j)mX- -set, then A is an (i, j)mX- -set for all i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. Let A be an (i, j)mX- -set. Then there exist G and R such that A =GR where G is mXi-open in (X, mXi) and R is an mXj-regular closed. By Proposition 3.1.5, R is an mXj- -set. Hence A is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Proposition 3.2.15 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and M be a subset of X. If M is an (i, j) mX-locally closed set, then it is also an (i, j)mX- -set, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. Let M be (i, j)mX-locally closed set. Then there exist U and B such that M =UB where U is mXi-open and B is mXj-closed. Since B is mXj- closed, B = mXjCl(B).

Thus mXjInt(B) = mXjInt(mXjCl(B)). Hence B is an mXj- -set.

Thus M is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Definition 3.2.16 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and A X. Then A is said to be an (i, j)mX- -set if A =UB, when U is an mXi-open and B is mXj-preclosed, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

The family of all (i, j)mX- -sets in a biminimal structure space (X, mX1, mX2) is denoted by (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2), where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Example 3.2.17 Let X = {1, 2, 3}. Define m-structures mX1 and mX2 on X as follows : mX1 = {Ø, {1}, {2}, {2, 3}, X} and mX2 = {Ø, {1}, {3}, {2, 3}, X}. Thus Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, X are preclosed in (X, mX2). Therefore, (1, 2)- (X, mX1, mX2) ={Ø, {1}, {2}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, X}.

Theorem 3.2.18. Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and AX. If A is an (i, j)mX- -set, then A is an (i, j)mX- -set for all i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof Let A be an (i, j)mX- -set. Then there exist G and R such that A =GR where G is mXi-open and R is an mXj- regular closed. Since R = mXjCl(mXjInt(R)), thus

mXjCl(mXjInt(R))R. Hence R is an mXj-preclosed.

Therefore, A is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Proposition 3.2.19 Let (X, mX1, mX2) be a biminimal structure space and M be a subset of X. If M is an (i, j) mX-locally closed set, then it is also an (i, j)mX- -set, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. Let M be an (i, j)mX-locally closed set. Then there exist U and B such that M = UB where U is mXi-open in (X, mXi) and B is mXj-closed.

It follows that mXjCl(mXjInt(B)) mXjCl(B) = B. Then B is an mXj-preclosed. Hence M is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Proposition 3.2.20 Let A be a subset of a biminimal stucture space (X, mX1, mX2) and mXj has the property . Then A is an (i, j)mX- -set iff A = UmXjpcl(A) for some U mXi, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. (⇒) Let A be (i, j)mX- -set. Then there exist U and B such that A =UB where U is mXi-open and B is mXj-preclosed. From A B, mXjpcl(A) mXjpcl(B) by Proposition 2.11, mXjpcl(B) = B mXjCl(mXjInt(B)). As B is mXj-preclosed, mXjCl(mXjInt(B))B. Hence mXjpcl(B)

= B. Thus mXjpcl(A) B. Therefore A = UmXjpcl(A).

(⇐) Let A = UmXjpcl(A) for some UmXi. Since mXjpcl(A) is an mXj-preclosed. Therefore, A is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Proposition 3.2.21 Let A be a subset of a biminimal stucture space (X, mX1, mX2) and mXj has the property . Then A = UmXjCl(mXjInt(A)) for some U mXi if and only if A is an mXj-semi-open and (i, j)mX- -set, where i, j = 1 or 2 and i j.

Proof. (⇒) Let A = UmXjCl(mXjInt(A)) for some UmXi. Then AmXjCl(mXjInt(A)). Thus A is an mXj-semi- open. By Lemma 2.6, mXjCl(mXjInt(A)) is mXj-closed. Since mXjInt(mXjCl(mXjInt(A))) mXjCl(mXjInt(A)), mXjCl (mXjInt(mXjCl(mXjInt(A)))) mXjCl(mXjInt(A)). Hence mXjCl(mXjInt(A)) is mXj-preclosed. Then A is an (i, j)mX- -set.

(⇐) Let A be an mXj-semi-open and

(i, j)mX- -set. By Proposition 3.2.20, A = UmXjpcl(A) for some U mXi. Since A is mXj-semi-open. Then AmXjCl(mXjInt(A)). Since mXj has the property and by Proposition 2.11, mXjpcl(A) = A mXjCl(mXjInt(A)). Thus mXjpcl(A) = mXjCl(mXjInt(A)). Hence A = UmXjCl(mXjInt(A))

(6)

-Sets in Biminimal Structure Spaces 509

Vol 37. No 4, July-August 2018

for some U mXi.

Theorem 3.2.22 Let A be a subset of a biminimal stucture space (X, mX1, mX2) and mXj has the property . If a subset M of X is an mXj-semi-open and (i, j)mX- -set, then it is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Proof. Let M be an mXj-semi-open and ((i, j)mX - -set. By Proposition 3.2.21, then M = U mXjCl(mXjInt(M)), for some U mXi. Since mXjCl(mXjInt(M)) is mXj-regular closed. Therefore, M is an (i, j)mX- -set.

Definition 3.2.23 Let (X, mX1, mX2) and (Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure spaces.

A function f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2) is said to be (1) (i, j)-semi-continuous if f – 1(V) (i, j)-SO(X, mX1, mX2) for all V mYi.

(1) (i, j)- -continuous if f – 1(V)(i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2) for all V mYi.

(1) (i, j)- -continuous if f – 1(V) (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2) for all V mYi.

(1) (i, j)- -continuous if f – 1(V)(i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2) for all V mYi. Proposition 3.2.24 Let (X, mX1, mX2) and

(Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure spaces. A function f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2) be a mapping. If f is (i, j)- -continuous then f is (i, j)- -continuous.

Proof. Let f be (i, j)- -continuous and V mYi. Then f

– 1(V) (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). By Lemma 3.2.7, we have f – 1(V)(i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). Hence f is (i, j)- -con- tinuous.

Theorem 3.2.25 Let (X, mX1, mX2) and (Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure spaces and mXj has the property . If a mapping f : (X, mX1, mX2)

(Y, mY1, mY2) is (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)- -con- tinuous then f is (i, j)- -continuous.

Proof. Let f be an (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)- -continuous and V mYi. Then f – 1(V) (i, j)-SO(X, mX1, mX2) and f – 1(V)(i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). By Proposition 3.2.8, thus f – 1(V) (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). Therefore, f is (i, j)- -continuous.

Theorem 3.2.26 Let (X, mX1, mX2) and (Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure spaces. If a mapping

f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2) is (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)- -continuous then f is (i, j)- -continuous.

Proof. Let f be an (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)- -con- tinuous and V mYi. Then f – 1(V) (i, j)-SO(X, mX1, mX2) and f – 1(V) (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). By Theorem 3.2.22, thus f – 1(V) (i, j)- (X, mX1, mX2). Therefore, f is (i, j)- -continuous.

Conclusion

In this paper, we introduced the concept of -sets in biminimal structure spaces. We also studied some properties of -sets and -continuous function on the space. The following implications hold for a biminimal structure spaces. These implications are not reversible.

Theorem 3.2.25. Let (X, mX, mX) and (Y, mY, mY) be biminimal structure spaces and mXj has the property 𝔅𝔅. If a mapping f : (X, mX1, mX2) (Y, mY1, mY2) is (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)-ℒ𝒞𝒞- continuous then f is (i, j)-𝒜𝒜-continuous.

Proof. Let f be an (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)-

ℒ𝒞𝒞-continuous and V mYi. Then f – 1(V) (i, j)- SO(X, mX1, mX2) and f – 1(V)(i, j)-ℒ𝒞𝒞(X, mX1, mX2).

By Proposition 3.2.8, thus f – 1(V) (i, j)-𝒜𝒜(X, mX1, mX2). Therefore, f is (i, j)-𝒜𝒜-continuous.

Theorem 3.2.26. Let (X, mX1, mX2) and (Y, mY1, mY2) be biminimal structure spaces. If a mapping f : (X, mX1, mX2)(Y, mY1, mY2) is (i, j)-semi- continuous and (i, j)-𝒞𝒞-continuous then f is (i, j)-𝒜𝒜- continuous.

Proof. Let f be an (i, j)-semi-continuous and (i, j)-𝒞𝒞- continuous and V mYi. Then f – 1(V) (i, j)-SO(X, mX1, mX2) and f – 1(V) (i, j)-𝒞𝒞(X, mX1, mX2). By Theorem 3.2.22, thus f – 1(V) (i, j)-𝒜𝒜(X, mX1, mX2).

Therefore, f is (i, j)-𝒜𝒜-continuous.

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we introduced the concept of

𝒜𝒜-sets in biminimal structure spaces. We also studied some properties of 𝒜𝒜-sets and 𝒜𝒜- continuous function on the space. The following implications hold for a biminimal structure spaces.

These implications are not reversible.

an (i, j)mX-𝒜𝒜-set an (i, j)mX--set

an (i, j)mX-ℒ𝒞𝒞-set an (i, j)mX-𝒞𝒞-set

5. Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the referees for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

6. References

[1] Andrijevic D. Semi-preopen sets. (1986), Math.

Vesnik., 38, 24-32.

[2] Boonpok C. Almost and weakly M-continuous functions in m-spaces. Far East J.

Math.Sci,43 (2010),29-40

[3] Boonpok C. Biminimal structure space. (2010), Int.Math.Forum,5(15),703-707

[4] Boonpok C. M-continuous functions on biminimal structure space. Far East J.

Math.Sci,43 (2010),41-58

[5] Bourbaki N. General Topology. Part 1. (1996), Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley.

[6] Császár Á. connected sets. Acta Math. Hungar.

(2003), 101(4): 273-279.

[7] Dugundji J. Topology. (1972), Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

[8] Erguang Y and Pengfei Y.On decomposition of A-continuity.(2006),Acta Math. Hungar.,

110, 309-313.

[9] Ganster M. and Reilly, I. L. A decomposition of continuity. (1990). Acta Math.Hungar., 56, 299- 301.

[10] Kelly J.C Bitopological space. (1969), Pro.London Math.Soc.,39130,71-79 [11] Keun Min W. m-open set and

M-continuous functions. (2010), Commun.

Korean. Math. Soc. 25, No.2, pp 251-256 [12] Levine N. Semi-open sets and semi-continuity

in topological spaces. (1963), Amer. Math.

Monthly, 70, 36-41.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the referees for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

References

1. Andrijevic D. Semi-preopen sets. (1986), Math. Vesnik., 38, 24-32.

2. Boonpok C. Almost and weakly M-continuous functions in m-spaces. Far East J.Math.Sci, 43 (2010), 29-40 3. Boonpok C. Biminimal structure space. (2010), Int.

Math. Forum, 5(15), 703-707

4. Boonpok C. M-continuous functions on biminimal structure space. Far East J.Math.Sci, 43 (2010), 41-58 5. Bourbaki N. General Topology. Part 1. (1996),

Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley.

6. Császár Á. connected sets. Acta Math. Hungar.

(2003), 101(4): 273-279.

7. Dugundji J. Topology. (1972), Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

8. Erguang Y and Pengfei Y.On decomposition of A-continuity. (2006), Acta Math. Hungar., 110, 309-313.

9. Ganster M. and Reilly, I. L. A decomposition of continuity. (1990). Acta Math.Hungar., 56, 299-301.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait